The City Clerk of Emeryville filed a petition for a peremptory writ of mandate to order the Alameda County Board of Supervisors and Registrar of Voters to amend a candidate statement in the voter information pamphlet. Specifically, the petition seeks to remove the phrase "As the first Black woman in 34 years to seek a seat on Council" from the candidate statement of Courtney Welch because it was discovered to be factually inaccurate after submission. The petition argues this statement must be removed to comply with election laws requiring candidate statements to be true and not misleading to voters.
The Supreme Court of Hawaii dismissed Martin Han's election complaint challenging the results of the primary election for a seat on the Honolulu City Council. The Court found that Han failed to name the necessary and indispensable party, the city clerk of Honolulu. Additionally, Han did not provide evidence of mistakes or errors sufficient to change the election outcome, as is required. The Court concluded Joey Manahan was elected to the District 7 seat with 51% of the votes.
These petitions were filed in the High Court of Karnataka seeking to quash several FIRs registered in Tumkur district against various foreign nationals for alleged violations of the Foreigners Act. The FIRs were registered by the Thilak Park police station in Tumkur based on complaints filed against the petitioners for participating in religious activities while being in India on a tourist visa. The petitions argued that the FIRs should be quashed as no cognizable offense was made out in the complaints. The court heard petitions from over 15 foreign nationals seeking to quash the FIRs.
The document is an order from a United States Bankruptcy Court case dismissing an adversary proceeding with prejudice. The order approves a stipulation between the plaintiff Virgie Arthur and defendant Bonnie Gayle Stern to dismiss the adversary proceeding, with each party bearing their own costs and fees. The court retains jurisdiction over the interpretation and enforcement of the order.
Defendants dismas charities,inc.,ana gispert,derek thomas and adams leshota's...Cocoselul Inaripat
1) The document is a motion to dismiss a complaint filed by Traian Bujduveanu against Dismas Charities Inc., Ana Gispert, Derek Thomas, and Adams Leshota.
2) The motion argues that the complaint should be dismissed for failing to state any valid causes of action. It does not provide specific facts or legal elements to support the ten alleged legal violations or theories of recovery.
3) The complaint also fails to delineate which defendant is being sued for each specific cause of action. The motion asserts that the complaint does not give the defendants proper notice of the reasons they are being sued.
The Supreme Court of Hawaii dismissed Martin Han's election complaint challenging the results of the primary election for a seat on the Honolulu City Council. The Court found that Han failed to name the necessary and indispensable party, the city clerk of Honolulu. Additionally, Han did not provide evidence of mistakes or errors sufficient to change the election outcome, as is required. The Court concluded Joey Manahan was elected to the District 7 seat with 51% of the votes.
These petitions were filed in the High Court of Karnataka seeking to quash several FIRs registered in Tumkur district against various foreign nationals for alleged violations of the Foreigners Act. The FIRs were registered by the Thilak Park police station in Tumkur based on complaints filed against the petitioners for participating in religious activities while being in India on a tourist visa. The petitions argued that the FIRs should be quashed as no cognizable offense was made out in the complaints. The court heard petitions from over 15 foreign nationals seeking to quash the FIRs.
The document is an order from a United States Bankruptcy Court case dismissing an adversary proceeding with prejudice. The order approves a stipulation between the plaintiff Virgie Arthur and defendant Bonnie Gayle Stern to dismiss the adversary proceeding, with each party bearing their own costs and fees. The court retains jurisdiction over the interpretation and enforcement of the order.
Defendants dismas charities,inc.,ana gispert,derek thomas and adams leshota's...Cocoselul Inaripat
1) The document is a motion to dismiss a complaint filed by Traian Bujduveanu against Dismas Charities Inc., Ana Gispert, Derek Thomas, and Adams Leshota.
2) The motion argues that the complaint should be dismissed for failing to state any valid causes of action. It does not provide specific facts or legal elements to support the ten alleged legal violations or theories of recovery.
3) The complaint also fails to delineate which defendant is being sued for each specific cause of action. The motion asserts that the complaint does not give the defendants proper notice of the reasons they are being sued.
This Supreme Court of Pennsylvania order addresses a challenge to the state's Voter ID Law. The order summarizes that: (1) while the state has a legitimate interest in requiring voter ID, the law is not being implemented according to its terms and some voters will be disenfranchised; (2) state agencies acknowledge voters will be unable to obtain IDs and elections may be impaired; and (3) the Commonwealth Court denied a preliminary injunction based on predictions that education and remedial efforts will prevent disenfranchisement, but appellants argue more time is needed for implementation. The order reviews the Commonwealth Court's denial of a preliminary injunction for abuse of discretion.
Complaint Election Contest Statement - CUT v. WMFPDJoshuaSharf
This document is a complaint filed in district court contesting the results of a special district election held by the West Metro Fire Protection District on May 6, 2014. The complaint alleges that the election violated voters' constitutional right to a secret ballot. Specifically, it claims that election officials could observe how identified individuals voted, compromising the integrity and secrecy of the election. The complaint seeks to void the election results and requests the court take jurisdiction over the case. It names the fire district, the designated election official, and winning candidates as defendants.
Defendant's Reply to State's Objection to Motion to Dismiss (Speedy Trial)Rich Bergeron
Here I take the prosecutor from Grafton County to task for all her mistakes and lack of proper legal analysis. Judge O'Neill will still rule in her favor, no matter how lax in her duties she is. I do go overboard and keep insisting the state had no motion pending. There was actually a motion to amend before the court, so I screwed up myself there, but not nearly as badly as Deputy Grafton County Attorney Tara Heater did.
Motion to Reconsider Denial of Motion to Dismiss on Speedy Trial GroundsRich Bergeron
Judge James D. O'Neill III denied my motion to dismiss. He had to overlook a great deal of facts and precedent law to come to the conclusion he did. I lay it all out for him in this motion to reconsider. Can he admit he was wrong, or will he keep being an ignorant and unethical disgrace to the bench? See WWW.NHDRUGTASKFORCE.COM to find out.
Grievance Filing Against Belknap County (NH) Attorney Andrew Livernois and De...Rich Bergeron
This is a detailed complaint I filed recently regarding an attempt by the local prosecutor's office to eviscerate my First Amendment rights and deny me my rights to due process throughout the case.
Andrew Livernois and Keith Cormier of the Belknap County Attorney's Office Ta...Rich Bergeron
The ACLU of New Hampshire opposes the State's motion for a court order prohibiting pre-trial publicity in the case of State v. Richard E. Bergeron, III. The ACLU argues that: 1) the Rules of Professional Conduct do not apply to pro se criminal defendants like Bergeron and cannot be the basis for a gag order; 2) even if the rules did apply, the proposed gag order exceeds the scope of the relevant rule by restricting speech that occurs far before trial and by ignoring exceptions; and 3) the proposed gag order would be an unconstitutional prior restraint on Bergeron's freedom of expression under the US and NH Constitutions.
Motion For Sanctions Against Andrew Livernois, Keith Cormier,Tara Heater and ...Rich Bergeron
My motion for sanctions against a pair of attorneys from Belknap County and another two from Grafton County. Four attorneys handling my case all lied and misrepresented the law. This motion demonstrates what is fundamentally wrong about your local justice system in New Hampshire.
Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Indictments Filed by Belknap County Attorney An...Rich Bergeron
Belknap County Attorney Andrew Livernois is pressing a case against me that represents clear cut entrapment. This is my motion to dismiss the six felony indictments based on the subjective and objective approaches to entrapment law.
Brinda karat and anr. v. state and anr. (defects cleared)sabrangsabrang
The petitioners have challenged an order passed by the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate dismissing their application under Section 156(3) of the CrPC seeking investigation and registration of an FIR for alleged hate speech by two Members of Parliament. The Magistrate held that prior sanction under Section 196 CrPC was required at this initial stage, which was not obtained. The petitioners argue that sanction is only required at the stage of cognizance, not investigation under Section 156(3). They further argue that the cases relied upon by the Magistrate are distinguishable and that requiring sanction at this stage would hamper access to justice. The petitioners seek quashing of the impugned order and issuance of directions.
Reply to State's Objection to Request For Court-Ordered SanctionsRich Bergeron
This is my quick reply to the ridiculously deficient objection to my sanctions motion filed by Deputy Grafton County Attorney Tara Heater. The judge ended up not giving Heater an extension and set the hearing for March 5, 2021.
The trial court dismissed the plaintiff's first amended complaint against Washington County with prejudice. The plaintiff appealed, arguing the trial court erred in two ways: 1) in ruling the defendant did not have a duty to prevent the filing and maintenance of a false mental health report, and 2) in ruling the defendant did not have a duty to prevent foreseeable harm to deaf taxpayers caused by the lack of a deaf communication policy. The plaintiff asserts sufficient facts were presented to state claims and that the dismissal should be reversed to allow amendment of the complaint.
This document summarizes a Supreme Court of India judgment regarding an appeal challenging the dismissal of a petition seeking to quash a charge sheet and summoning order. The key details are:
1) The case involves a dispute over possession of land between the appellant and respondent, who belongs to a Scheduled Caste.
2) The respondent filed an FIR alleging the appellant abused and threatened her while preventing construction on the disputed land.
3) The appellant argued the charges did not disclose offenses under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Act.
4) The Supreme Court analyzed the case and prior judgments, finding the alleged acts did not occur in public view as required by the law, and there
Indiana House - motion to intervene , filed by intervenor defendant indiana ...Abdul-Hakim Shabazz
As Indiana lawmaker attempt to hire their own counsel to represent them in the sexual harassment case involving Attorney General Curtis Hill, they also spell out their own defenses as to why the state is not liable.
This document provides information about pending whistleblower applications in an ongoing judicial matter. It notes that the whistleblower/applicant has 10 pending applications in the case that have yet to be decided, dating back to 2011. These applications include requests for records, to add parties to the case, and to present evidence. The document calls for the applications to be decided in sequential order so that the whistleblower can properly present evidence in the matter involving alleged criminal conspiracy. It also discusses how a pending probate case could impact the whistleblower's ability to prosecute the case depending on the determination of his locus standi or legal standing.
Defendant's Motion to dismiss for violation of speedy trial rightsRich Bergeron
I prepared a very crisp and professional motion to dismiss just to watch Judge James D. O'Neill shoot it down with junk logic and misrepresentation of the law. He continues to show his blind loyalty to the bumbling prosecutors on my case. I had more than one lawyer tell me this was an excellent motion and hit on all the right points. This is where an appeal would expose how biased the judge really is.
Motion to Schedule Trial (Speedy Trial Rights)Rich Bergeron
1. Richard Bergeron III filed a motion to schedule his trial as soon as possible in his criminal case in Belknap County Superior Court, citing violations of his right to a speedy trial.
2. Bergeron was arrested in February 2019 and remains on bail conditions, but over two years later there is still no trial date set due to scheduling delays and a backlogged court docket.
3. Bergeron argues that further delays in scheduling his trial would continue to violate his constitutional right to a speedy trial and requests that his case be scheduled for trial immediately or dismissed.
This document is a memorandum opinion from a federal district court case. The court is granting the defendant City of St. Paul's motion for summary judgment, dismissing the plaintiff Aaron Foster's lawsuit. Foster, an African American employee of the St. Paul Police Department, was suspended without pay after being indicted for a 1981 murder. Though later acquitted, Foster claimed this suspension constituted race discrimination. However, Foster admitted there was no evidence of race discrimination. The court also found Foster's other claims unsupported and granted the City's motion for summary judgment.
State's Objection to Motion For Sanctions Against Tara Heater, Martha Ann Hor...Rich Bergeron
Answering a pile of documented accusations with a couple pages of complete BS, Attorney Tara Heater still hasn't provided any affidavits to back up her lies. This is her objection to my latest motion, which basically says she'd like to rely on her objection to the last motion for sanctions. Total laziness and obviously now a matter of being afraid to dig herself deeper.
This document is a memorandum in support of a motion for a preliminary injunction filed by Daniel Sparaco, a plaintiff seeking ballot access as an unaffiliated candidate for Baltimore City Council. It summarizes that Maryland used to have a July 1 deadline for unaffiliated candidates to file declarations of intent to seek ballot access, but in 2015 changed it to February 3, the same deadline as major party candidates. It argues this new deadline is unconstitutional under Supreme Court and 4th Circuit precedent and asks the court to enjoin its enforcement and accept declarations by the previous July 1 deadline.
This document is a complaint filed in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland by Dan Sparaco against Linda Lamone and others in their official capacities with the Maryland State Board of Elections. The complaint challenges a 2015 change to Maryland law that moved the deadline for unaffiliated candidates to file a declaration of intent to seek ballot access by petition from July 1 to February 3, 83 days before the major party primaries. The complaint argues this change unconstitutionally benefits major parties and disadvantages independent candidates. It seeks to invalidate the law change and enjoin the defendants to accept declarations by the previous July 1 deadline.
This Supreme Court of Pennsylvania order addresses a challenge to the state's Voter ID Law. The order summarizes that: (1) while the state has a legitimate interest in requiring voter ID, the law is not being implemented according to its terms and some voters will be disenfranchised; (2) state agencies acknowledge voters will be unable to obtain IDs and elections may be impaired; and (3) the Commonwealth Court denied a preliminary injunction based on predictions that education and remedial efforts will prevent disenfranchisement, but appellants argue more time is needed for implementation. The order reviews the Commonwealth Court's denial of a preliminary injunction for abuse of discretion.
Complaint Election Contest Statement - CUT v. WMFPDJoshuaSharf
This document is a complaint filed in district court contesting the results of a special district election held by the West Metro Fire Protection District on May 6, 2014. The complaint alleges that the election violated voters' constitutional right to a secret ballot. Specifically, it claims that election officials could observe how identified individuals voted, compromising the integrity and secrecy of the election. The complaint seeks to void the election results and requests the court take jurisdiction over the case. It names the fire district, the designated election official, and winning candidates as defendants.
Defendant's Reply to State's Objection to Motion to Dismiss (Speedy Trial)Rich Bergeron
Here I take the prosecutor from Grafton County to task for all her mistakes and lack of proper legal analysis. Judge O'Neill will still rule in her favor, no matter how lax in her duties she is. I do go overboard and keep insisting the state had no motion pending. There was actually a motion to amend before the court, so I screwed up myself there, but not nearly as badly as Deputy Grafton County Attorney Tara Heater did.
Motion to Reconsider Denial of Motion to Dismiss on Speedy Trial GroundsRich Bergeron
Judge James D. O'Neill III denied my motion to dismiss. He had to overlook a great deal of facts and precedent law to come to the conclusion he did. I lay it all out for him in this motion to reconsider. Can he admit he was wrong, or will he keep being an ignorant and unethical disgrace to the bench? See WWW.NHDRUGTASKFORCE.COM to find out.
Grievance Filing Against Belknap County (NH) Attorney Andrew Livernois and De...Rich Bergeron
This is a detailed complaint I filed recently regarding an attempt by the local prosecutor's office to eviscerate my First Amendment rights and deny me my rights to due process throughout the case.
Andrew Livernois and Keith Cormier of the Belknap County Attorney's Office Ta...Rich Bergeron
The ACLU of New Hampshire opposes the State's motion for a court order prohibiting pre-trial publicity in the case of State v. Richard E. Bergeron, III. The ACLU argues that: 1) the Rules of Professional Conduct do not apply to pro se criminal defendants like Bergeron and cannot be the basis for a gag order; 2) even if the rules did apply, the proposed gag order exceeds the scope of the relevant rule by restricting speech that occurs far before trial and by ignoring exceptions; and 3) the proposed gag order would be an unconstitutional prior restraint on Bergeron's freedom of expression under the US and NH Constitutions.
Motion For Sanctions Against Andrew Livernois, Keith Cormier,Tara Heater and ...Rich Bergeron
My motion for sanctions against a pair of attorneys from Belknap County and another two from Grafton County. Four attorneys handling my case all lied and misrepresented the law. This motion demonstrates what is fundamentally wrong about your local justice system in New Hampshire.
Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Indictments Filed by Belknap County Attorney An...Rich Bergeron
Belknap County Attorney Andrew Livernois is pressing a case against me that represents clear cut entrapment. This is my motion to dismiss the six felony indictments based on the subjective and objective approaches to entrapment law.
Brinda karat and anr. v. state and anr. (defects cleared)sabrangsabrang
The petitioners have challenged an order passed by the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate dismissing their application under Section 156(3) of the CrPC seeking investigation and registration of an FIR for alleged hate speech by two Members of Parliament. The Magistrate held that prior sanction under Section 196 CrPC was required at this initial stage, which was not obtained. The petitioners argue that sanction is only required at the stage of cognizance, not investigation under Section 156(3). They further argue that the cases relied upon by the Magistrate are distinguishable and that requiring sanction at this stage would hamper access to justice. The petitioners seek quashing of the impugned order and issuance of directions.
Reply to State's Objection to Request For Court-Ordered SanctionsRich Bergeron
This is my quick reply to the ridiculously deficient objection to my sanctions motion filed by Deputy Grafton County Attorney Tara Heater. The judge ended up not giving Heater an extension and set the hearing for March 5, 2021.
The trial court dismissed the plaintiff's first amended complaint against Washington County with prejudice. The plaintiff appealed, arguing the trial court erred in two ways: 1) in ruling the defendant did not have a duty to prevent the filing and maintenance of a false mental health report, and 2) in ruling the defendant did not have a duty to prevent foreseeable harm to deaf taxpayers caused by the lack of a deaf communication policy. The plaintiff asserts sufficient facts were presented to state claims and that the dismissal should be reversed to allow amendment of the complaint.
This document summarizes a Supreme Court of India judgment regarding an appeal challenging the dismissal of a petition seeking to quash a charge sheet and summoning order. The key details are:
1) The case involves a dispute over possession of land between the appellant and respondent, who belongs to a Scheduled Caste.
2) The respondent filed an FIR alleging the appellant abused and threatened her while preventing construction on the disputed land.
3) The appellant argued the charges did not disclose offenses under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Act.
4) The Supreme Court analyzed the case and prior judgments, finding the alleged acts did not occur in public view as required by the law, and there
Indiana House - motion to intervene , filed by intervenor defendant indiana ...Abdul-Hakim Shabazz
As Indiana lawmaker attempt to hire their own counsel to represent them in the sexual harassment case involving Attorney General Curtis Hill, they also spell out their own defenses as to why the state is not liable.
This document provides information about pending whistleblower applications in an ongoing judicial matter. It notes that the whistleblower/applicant has 10 pending applications in the case that have yet to be decided, dating back to 2011. These applications include requests for records, to add parties to the case, and to present evidence. The document calls for the applications to be decided in sequential order so that the whistleblower can properly present evidence in the matter involving alleged criminal conspiracy. It also discusses how a pending probate case could impact the whistleblower's ability to prosecute the case depending on the determination of his locus standi or legal standing.
Defendant's Motion to dismiss for violation of speedy trial rightsRich Bergeron
I prepared a very crisp and professional motion to dismiss just to watch Judge James D. O'Neill shoot it down with junk logic and misrepresentation of the law. He continues to show his blind loyalty to the bumbling prosecutors on my case. I had more than one lawyer tell me this was an excellent motion and hit on all the right points. This is where an appeal would expose how biased the judge really is.
Motion to Schedule Trial (Speedy Trial Rights)Rich Bergeron
1. Richard Bergeron III filed a motion to schedule his trial as soon as possible in his criminal case in Belknap County Superior Court, citing violations of his right to a speedy trial.
2. Bergeron was arrested in February 2019 and remains on bail conditions, but over two years later there is still no trial date set due to scheduling delays and a backlogged court docket.
3. Bergeron argues that further delays in scheduling his trial would continue to violate his constitutional right to a speedy trial and requests that his case be scheduled for trial immediately or dismissed.
This document is a memorandum opinion from a federal district court case. The court is granting the defendant City of St. Paul's motion for summary judgment, dismissing the plaintiff Aaron Foster's lawsuit. Foster, an African American employee of the St. Paul Police Department, was suspended without pay after being indicted for a 1981 murder. Though later acquitted, Foster claimed this suspension constituted race discrimination. However, Foster admitted there was no evidence of race discrimination. The court also found Foster's other claims unsupported and granted the City's motion for summary judgment.
State's Objection to Motion For Sanctions Against Tara Heater, Martha Ann Hor...Rich Bergeron
Answering a pile of documented accusations with a couple pages of complete BS, Attorney Tara Heater still hasn't provided any affidavits to back up her lies. This is her objection to my latest motion, which basically says she'd like to rely on her objection to the last motion for sanctions. Total laziness and obviously now a matter of being afraid to dig herself deeper.
This document is a memorandum in support of a motion for a preliminary injunction filed by Daniel Sparaco, a plaintiff seeking ballot access as an unaffiliated candidate for Baltimore City Council. It summarizes that Maryland used to have a July 1 deadline for unaffiliated candidates to file declarations of intent to seek ballot access, but in 2015 changed it to February 3, the same deadline as major party candidates. It argues this new deadline is unconstitutional under Supreme Court and 4th Circuit precedent and asks the court to enjoin its enforcement and accept declarations by the previous July 1 deadline.
This document is a complaint filed in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland by Dan Sparaco against Linda Lamone and others in their official capacities with the Maryland State Board of Elections. The complaint challenges a 2015 change to Maryland law that moved the deadline for unaffiliated candidates to file a declaration of intent to seek ballot access by petition from July 1 to February 3, 83 days before the major party primaries. The complaint argues this change unconstitutionally benefits major parties and disadvantages independent candidates. It seeks to invalidate the law change and enjoin the defendants to accept declarations by the previous July 1 deadline.
Appeal - Bulfaro - Bucks County Court of Common Pleas - 4-2023Ax318960
The Bucks County Prothonotary denied Gregory Bulfaro's request for a copy of page 9 from a civil court document. After multiple attempts to obtain the record from various county offices, Bulfaro filed an appeal with the Pennsylvania Office of Open Records. The Office dismissed both of Bulfaro's appeals for lack of jurisdiction over the judicial agency. Bulfaro argues that as a custodian of public court records, the Prothonotary must facilitate access under the Public Access Policy of the Unified Judicial System of Pennsylvania.
The petitioner, Ramesh Chennithala, MLA has filed a writ petition against the Election Commission of India and the Chief Electoral Officer of Kerala. The petitioner contends that there are multiple entries of voters in various places in the final electoral roll published for the upcoming Kerala state assembly elections. According to the petitioner, there are around 3.24 lakh double votes and 1.09 lakh bogus votes across 131 assembly constituencies. The petitioner had sent several letters to the respondents but no action was taken. The court noted discrepancies in the electoral roll based on documents submitted. It directed the Election Commission to ensure no double voting and adequate security at polling booths to ensure free and fair elections. The Commission was told to
Item # 11 -- May 2024 General Election Orderahcitycouncil
The document summarizes an ordinance ordering a general election in Alamo Heights, Texas to be held on May 4, 2024 to elect three city council members. It appoints Jacquelyn F. Callanen, the Bexar County Elections Administrator, to conduct the election. It also provides details on polling locations, early voting dates and times, candidate filing periods, and notices to be published.
20200512 guj hc order on chudasama election 2017sabrangsabrang
This document is a judgment from the High Court of Gujarat regarding an election petition challenging the results of the 2017 Gujarat state assembly election in the 58-Dholka constituency. It summarizes the key details of the case, including the allegations made by the petitioner (candidate who lost the election) against the returning officer and winning candidate. It records the evidence and arguments presented by both sides and provides answers to the issues framed by the court. In the end, it outlines the court's final order in the case.
This complaint contests the results of the November 4, 2014 election for a seat on the Honolulu City Council District 4. It alleges that 74 ballots that were counted as blank were actually votes for either candidate, and that miscounting these ballots could have changed the outcome of the election. It also alleges issues with the reporting of overvotes and undervotes in the district. The complaint seeks a recount of the ballots or a new election.
This Is Reno’s second public records lawsuit against the City of Reno and Ren...This Is Reno
Petitioner Robert Conrad, who operates the news website ThisIsReno.com, has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus against the City of Reno regarding numerous public records requests. The petition alleges that the City has improperly withheld, redacted, and delayed the disclosure of requested records on various police matters. It also claims the City has improperly closed some requests and demanded payment for records not listed in its fee schedule. The petition seeks an order requiring the City to comply with the Nevada Public Records Act and provide timely access to public records.
This document establishes procedures for Animal Control Officers to follow regarding the issuance, control, and transmittal of citations (Notices to Appear) for violations of laws. It outlines the required steps for properly filling out citations, including obtaining violator information, selecting the correct violation, and providing court appearance information. Supplemental reports are required for certain violation types. Strict controls are maintained over citation book issuance and records.
This document is a notice of appeal filed by Governor Eric Holcomb appealing a trial court decision regarding the constitutionality of HEA 1123, an Indiana statute addressing the General Assembly's ability to address future emergencies. It provides information about the parties, attorneys, trial court case, basis for jurisdiction, requests for records, and certifications. The governor is appealing the trial court's entry and orders granting summary judgment to the defendants on the governor's challenge to HEA 1123 under the Indiana Constitution.
The City Council of San Angelo, Texas held a special meeting on June 25, 2013 to canvass the results of the runoff election held on June 15, 2013. The council declared Dwain Morrison the winner of the mayoral race, Rodney Fleming the winner of the District 1 city council seat, and H.R. "Winkie" Wardlaw III the winner of the District 5 city council seat. The meeting also included administering oaths of office to the newly elected officials and presenting them with certificates of election.
This document discusses several cases related to elections in the Philippines that were decided by the Supreme Court:
1. Soller v. COMELEC - The Supreme Court ruled that the COMELEC sitting en banc does not have the authority to decide election cases in the first instance, only its divisions have this power.
2. Aquino vs. COMELEC - The Supreme Court defined "residency" in the context of election qualifications as meaning "domicile" or permanent home, in order to exclude newcomers unfamiliar with community needs.
3. Benwaren vs COMELEC - The Supreme Court upheld COMELEC's decision that the integrity of an election return
The writ petition concerns a case of alleged child sexual abuse, forced hidden prostitution of minor girls, human trafficking, and illicit sex trade reported by the petitioner whistleblower to authorities. The petitioner reported the incident to the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights on 12th April 2021. On 13th April 2021, an official from NCPCR responded requesting more details from the petitioner within 3 days to take immediate action. However, the petitioner alleges he was unlawfully detained by Delhi Police for blowing the whistle on the case and filing reports to rescue and rehabilitate the minor victims. He now seeks intervention from the Supreme Court under Article 32.
This document outlines Texas laws regarding volunteer deputy voter registrars and high school deputy registrars. It discusses the appointment process for volunteer deputy registrars, including eligibility, terms of service, and prohibited bases for refusal of appointment. It also describes the duties of deputy registrars, such as reviewing applications for completeness and delivering applications to the registrar within certain deadlines. Failure to perform duties, such as timely delivery of applications, is subject to criminal penalties. High school principals are automatically made deputy registrars and must distribute voter registration forms to eligible students twice per school year.
Similar to 2021 Emeryville Special Election Petition (20)
MAISY DOE, a minor by and through her Guardian ad Litem, KAREN DOE,
Plaintiff,
vs.
EMERY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, DANIEL PARHAM and ROES 1 through 30, inclusive,
Defendants
The document outlines 6 goals for the Superintendent over a 3-year period from 2021-2023. The goals are related to students, school culture, community, fiscal stability, board relationships, and equity. Each goal includes specific, measurable objectives and proposed data collection tools. The goals are aligned with the district's overall goals of providing equitable access to education, facilitating global awareness and collaboration, and engaging the community. The Superintendent will be evaluated annually based on progress towards these goals.
City of Emeryville 2023-2031 Housing Element [Public Draft]E'ville Eye
This document is a public review draft of Emeryville's 2023-2031 Housing Element. It includes an assessment of housing needs, constraints to housing development, an analysis of fair housing issues, an inventory of housing resources and sites, a review of accomplishments from the prior housing element period, and goals, policies and programs for the upcoming planning period. Key topics covered include housing characteristics, affordable housing need, the city's Regional Housing Needs Allocation, governmental and non-governmental constraints to development, patterns of segregation and access to opportunity, disproportionate housing needs, and a quantification of objectives for the new element.
Wood Street Engagement Sessions FAQ.pdfE'ville Eye
Caltrans published a Q&A from stakeholders regarding the top-priorities for addressing the conditions of the “Wood Street” homeless encampment in West Oakland.
Item 9.2 bay street emeryville grocery store staff reportE'ville Eye
This document discusses plans to expand and activate public spaces around a grocery store development project in Emeryville, California. It includes renderings and diagrams showing how outdoor areas, walkways, and green spaces around the store could be improved with new landscaping, seating, lighting, and other amenities to create a more vibrant and pedestrian-friendly environment for shoppers and the surrounding community. Details are provided on pages 14 through 67 regarding the proposed design changes, materials, and features of the renovated public areas to enhance the shopping experience and encourage community use of the shared spaces.
The document summarizes the history of innovation and redevelopment in Emeryville, California. It describes how Emeryville transformed from a "Butchertown" in the late 1800s to an industrial area with a steel mill and paint plant. It then discusses how the city used redevelopment agencies and tax increment financing to redevelop abandoned industrial sites into mixed-use centers beginning in the 1960s. Some examples of redeveloped sites mentioned include the Santa Fe Rail Yard, East BayBridge Center, and sites that became home to Pixar Animation Studios and Clif Bar. The document also shows population growth over time and the expansion of Emeryville's transit centers and Amtrak station.
This letter from the Community Development Director of Emeryville, California informs Onni Group that their application for the "Onni Christie Ave." project is being deemed withdrawn. The letter cites two reasons for this: 1) Onni is no longer under contract to purchase the project site and no longer has consent from the property owner to pursue entitlements, and 2) Onni has outstanding invoices totaling $55,670.91 for services related to the application that are past due. Onni has 15 days to appeal the decision and 10 days to pay the outstanding balance. Attachments provide background on the original application, a letter from the property owner rescinding consent, and an invoice for costs.
The document provides information about the proposed adaptive reuse of the former United Stamping building in Emeryville, California into an arts center. It will include renovating and rehabilitating the existing building structure, interior improvements, and landscaping. The project will add a new cafe addition, entrance, and rooftop dwelling unit. It provides details on the existing building features, proposed uses, code compliance, site and floor plans, and renderings of the proposed renovations.
This document provides project details for a proposed 90-unit affordable housing development located at 3600, 3610, and 3620 San Pablo Avenue in Emeryville, California. The project would consist of a 5-story building with ground floor retail and 90 affordable rental units above. It includes plans, elevations, sections, and renderings depicting the design. Project data tables compare the proposed development to the city's zoning regulations for metrics like density, parking, open space, and more.
This document provides an overview and proposed adjustments to Emeryville's mid-cycle budget review for fiscal years 2019-20 and 2020-21. It summarizes the significant negative impacts of COVID-19 on city revenues and outlines proposed budget balancing strategies, including use of one-time funds and reductions or delays in expenditures, to address a projected $15.2 million revenue shortfall over the two years. Key areas of revenue reduction include sales tax, hotel tax, business license tax, and cardroom tax. The document also reviews assumptions for various revenues, proposed adjustments to capital projects and other funds, and implications for pension and other future costs.
The document describes proposed developments at the Emeryville Center of Innovation in Emeryville, California. The project consists of two new buildings, B1 and B2/3 totaling 561,000 square feet, along with a parking structure, B13/14, with 2,018 parking spaces. Building B1 would be 11 stories and 300,000 square feet. Building B2/3 would be 7 stories and 261,000 square feet. The parking structure would be 9 levels. The buildings are intended to establish the Center of Innovation as a modern life science campus with research and office space.
The document proposes a $400,000 Emergency Rental Assistance Program for the City of Emeryville. Low-income renters who lost income due to COVID-19 could receive up to $3,000 per month in assistance to prevent homelessness. Applicants must prove residency in Emeryville and income loss. The City Manager would contract a nonprofit to administer applications, distribute funds, and refer recipients to other services. The program aims to help renters financially impacted by the pandemic health crisis.
Ac fr ogdxe1o77gyvrw6rruvtw7lusdahpeh-u_k0fz0g0qzdx80n9wtveg4_p2c17d1b-r2m4zv...E'ville Eye
Abraham David Martin is charged with assault with a deadly weapon and corporal injury to a relationship partner, Jane Doe, on January 25, 2020 in Alameda County, California. The complaint alleges that Martin assaulted Doe with a sword and inflicted great bodily injury in a domestic violence incident. Special allegations further charge that Martin personally used a deadly weapon and inflicted great bodily injury under circumstances involving domestic violence.
This document summarizes a study of congestion along the Bay Bridge corridor between Oakland and San Francisco. It finds that future traffic growth will significantly worsen congestion at the Bay Bridge toll plaza by 2035, blocking lanes used by Transbay buses and degrading transit operations. To address this, the study evaluates options like implementing a westbound contraflow lane on the Bay Bridge during morning commutes and improving access points. Microsimulation modeling shows that a contraflow lane, along with other improvements, could maintain transit reliability by keeping buses moving at acceptable speeds. However, the document notes further analysis is needed to study potential improvements to Bay Bridge on-ramps affecting afternoon traffic exiting San Francisco.
The Power of Community Newsletters: A Case Study from Wolverton and Greenleys...Scribe
YOU WILL DISCOVER:
The engaging history and evolution of Wolverton and Greenleys Town Council's newsletter
Strategies for producing a successful community newsletter and generating income through advertising
The decision-making process behind moving newsletter design from in-house to outsourcing and its impacts
Dive into the success story of Wolverton and Greenleys Town Council's newsletter in this insightful webinar. Hear from Mandy Shipp and Jemma English about the newsletter's journey from its inception to becoming a vital part of their community's communication, including its history, production process, and revenue generation through advertising. Discover the reasons behind outsourcing its design and the benefits this brought. Ideal for anyone involved in community engagement or interested in starting their own newsletter.
How To Cultivate Community Affinity Throughout The Generosity JourneyAggregage
This session will dive into how to create rich generosity experiences that foster long-lasting relationships. You’ll walk away with actionable insights to redefine how you engage with your supporters — emphasizing trust, engagement, and community!
karnataka housing board schemes . all schemesnarinav14
The Karnataka government, along with the central government’s Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (PMAY), offers various housing schemes to cater to the diverse needs of citizens across the state. This article provides a comprehensive overview of the major housing schemes available in the Karnataka housing board for both urban and rural areas in 2024.
Jennifer Schaus and Associates hosts a complimentary webinar series on The FAR in 2024. Join the webinars on Wednesdays and Fridays at noon, eastern.
Recordings are on YouTube and the company website.
https://www.youtube.com/@jenniferschaus/videos
Bharat Mata - History of Indian culture.pdfBharat Mata
Bharat Mata Channel is an initiative towards keeping the culture of this country alive. Our effort is to spread the knowledge of Indian history, culture, religion and Vedas to the masses.
Presentation by Rebecca Sachs and Joshua Varcie, analysts in CBO’s Health Analysis Division, at the 13th Annual Conference of the American Society of Health Economists.
Spending in the 340B Drug Pricing Program, 2010 to 2021
2021 Emeryville Special Election Petition
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9. 83578.0011334269158.4 PETITION FOR PEREMPTORY WRIT OF MANDATE
PURSUANT TO ELECTIONS CODE SECTION 13313 SUBDIVISION (B)(2)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
B
EST
B
EST
&
K
RIEGER
LLP
A
TTORNEYS
AT
L
AW
2001
N.
M
AIN
S
TREET
,
S
UITE
390
W
ALNUT
C
REEK
,
C
ALIFORNIA
94596
Petitioner SHERI HARTZ, in her capacity as City Clerk for the City of Emeryville and
the Elections Official for the City of Emeryville (“Petitioner”), alleges as follows:
INTRODUCTION
1. Petitioner seeks a peremptory writ of mandate pursuant to California Elections
Code section 133131
subdivision (b)(2) ordering Respondents ALAMEDA COUNTY BOARD
OF SUPERVISORS and ALAMEDA COUNTY REGISTRAR OF VOTERS (“Respondents”) to
amend the candidate statement of Real Party in Interest COURTNEY WELCH (“Ms. Welch”), a
candidate for the November 2, 2021 Emeryville City Council special election. Specifically,
Petitioner requests that the Court order Respondents to delete the portion of Ms. Welch’s
candidate statement that states “[a]s the first Black woman in 34 years to seek a seat on Council”
because after submission, it was discovered that this portion of the candidate statement is false. A
true and correct copy of Ms. Welch’s candidate statement is attached as Exhibit 1 to the
concurrently-filed Declaration of Sheri Hartz (“Hartz Decl.”) and incorporated herein by this
reference.
PRIORITY MATTER
2. Pursuant to Elections Code section 13314, subdivision (a)(3), as an election law
writ petition, this matter shall have priority over all other civil matters. Time is of the essence in
this proceeding because of Respondents’ impending August 27, 2021 deadline to finalize the
voter information pamphlet and related election materials and forward them to the printer. This
matter is timely brought because the factual error in the statement was discovered for the first
time on Wednesday, August 4, 2021, the nominations period closed on August 6, 2021, and this
petition is being filed within Respondents’ 10-calendar day public examination/statute of
limitations period. (See Elec. Code Elec. Code § 13313(b).) A true and correct copy of the email
notifying Petitioner of the factual error dated August 4, 2021 is attached as Exhibit 2 to the
concurrently-filed Declaration of Sheri Hartz and incorporated herein by this reference.
1
All further statutory references are to the Elections Code unless otherwise noted.
10. 83578.0011334269158.4
- 3 -
PETITION FOR PEREMPTORY WRIT OF MANDATE
PURSUANT TO ELECTIONS CODE SECTION 13313 SUBDIVISION (B)(2)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
B
EST
B
EST
&
K
RIEGER
LLP
A
TTORNEYS
AT
L
AW
2001
N.
M
AIN
S
TREET
,
S
UITE
390
W
ALNUT
C
REEK
,
C
ALIFORNIA
94596
PARTIES
3. Petitioner is, and at all relevant times was, the City Clerk for the City of
Emeryville, a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of
California. As City Clerk, Petitioner is the “election official” for purposes of Elections Code
sections 13313 and 13314. She is charged with responsibility for preparing the candidates’
statements for the election for City Council.
4. Upon information and belief, Respondents are charged by law with printing the
voter information pamphlet and other election materials in compliance with the law, and are
required to be named as Respondents herein.
5. Ms. Welch, Real Party in Interest, is a candidate for City Council of the City of
Emeryville in the November 2, 2021 special election to fill a vacancy created by a Council
Member’s resignation. Ms. Welch submitted a candidate statement that contains a factually
inaccurate representation that Ms. Welch is “the first Black woman in 34 years to seek a seat on
Council.” In fact, a Black woman sought a seat on City Council in Emeryville in 2016.
JURISDICTION & APPLICABLE LAW
6. This Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to Elections Code sections
13313 and 13314.
7. This Petition is brought pursuant to section 13313, subdivision (b):
(1) During the 10-calendary-day public examination period provided
by this section, any voter of the jurisdiction in which the election is
being held, or the elections official, himself or herself, may seek a
writ of mandate or an injunction requiring any or all of the material
in the candidates statements to be amended or deleted. The writ of
mandate or injunction request shall be filed no later than the end of
the 10-calendar-day public examination period.
(2) A peremptory writ of mandate or an injunction shall issue
only upon clear and convincing proof that the material in question
is false, misleading, or inconsistent with the requirements of this
chapter, and that issuance of the writ or injunction will not
substantially interfere with the printing or distribution of official
election materials as provided by law. (Emphasis added.)
(3) The elections official shall be named as respondent and the
candidate who authored the material in question shall be named as
the real party in interest. In the case of the elections official bringing
the mandamus or injunctive action pursuant to this subdivision, the
11. 83578.0011334269158.4
- 4 -
PETITION FOR PEREMPTORY WRIT OF MANDATE
PURSUANT TO ELECTIONS CODE SECTION 13313 SUBDIVISION (B)(2)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
B
EST
B
EST
&
K
RIEGER
LLP
A
TTORNEYS
AT
L
AW
2001
N.
M
AIN
S
TREET
,
S
UITE
390
W
ALNUT
C
REEK
,
C
ALIFORNIA
94596
board of supervisors of the county shall be named as the respondent
and the candidate who authored the material in question shall be
named as the real party in interest.
(Elec. Code § 13313(b).)
8. Section 13307, subdivision (a)(1) permits each candidate for nonpartisan elective
office in any city to prepare a candidate’s statement that includes the “name, age, and occupation
of the candidate and a brief description…of the candidate’s education and qualifications
expressed by the candidate himself or herself.” Subdivision (a)(3) provides that the statement
may be withdrawn, but not changed, during the period for filing nomination papers and until 5:00
p.m. the next working day after the close of the nomination period.
FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
9. On August 4, 2021, Ms. Welch submitted her papers and candidate statement for
her candidacy for member of City Council for the City of Emeryville in Alameda County,
California in the November 2, 2021 election. (Hartz Decl., ¶ 2.) As part of that submission, Ms.
Welch signed a statement and took an oath affirming everything submitted was true and correct.
(Hartz Decl., ¶ 2; Declaration of Courtney Welch (“Welch Decl.”), ¶ 2.)
10. Shortly after submission, Ms. Welch’s campaign discovered that the candidate
statement contained a factual error because it contained the statement: “[a]s the first Black
woman in 34 years to seek a seat on Council,” however, another Black woman, Brynnda Collins,
ran for a City Council seat in Emeryville in 2016. (See Welch Decl., ¶ 3, Exs. 1 & 2.)
11. Immediately upon learning of the factual inaccuracy, Ms. Welch’s campaign
contacted Petitioner to advise of the error and request that the language be stricken from the
statement. (Welch Decl., ¶ 4, Hartz Decl., ¶ 3, Ex. 1.)
12. When Ms. Welch’s campaign brought the error to Petitioner’s attention, Petitioner
confirmed the factual inaccuracy of the statement at issue. (Hartz Decl., ¶ 4.)
13. The nominations period for the November 2, 2021 election closed on
August 6, 2021 at 5 p.m. (Hartz Decl., ¶ 5.)
14. On information and belief, the voter information pamphlet printing deadline for
the November 2, 2021 special election August 27, 2021. (Hartz Decl., ¶ 6.)
12. 83578.0011334269158.4
- 5 -
PETITION FOR PEREMPTORY WRIT OF MANDATE
PURSUANT TO ELECTIONS CODE SECTION 13313 SUBDIVISION (B)(2)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
B
EST
B
EST
&
K
RIEGER
LLP
A
TTORNEYS
AT
L
AW
2001
N.
M
AIN
S
TREET
,
S
UITE
390
W
ALNUT
C
REEK
,
C
ALIFORNIA
94596
EQUITABLE RELIEF IS APPROPRIATE AND JUSTIFIED
15. The issuance of the requested writ of mandate will not substantially interfere with
the conduct of the election insofar as there is sufficient time for the parties to brief the matter and
for oral argument to be held and a trial court decision rendered prior to the August 27, 2021 voter
information pamphlet printing deadline.
16. Should the requested writ not issue, irreparable harm will occur in that the false
information in Ms. Welch’s candidate statement will appear in the voter information pamphlet
and on the ballot, which is likely to mislead and/or confuse voters.
17. Petitioner is entitled to prompt judicial review of this matter, and this procedure
for a writ of mandate is the appropriate procedure for obtaining that judicial review.
FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION
(Petition for Writ of Mandate – Elections Code, §§ 13313(b)(2) & 13314)
Against Respondents
18. Petitioner realleges and incorporates herein by reference the allegations of
paragraphs 1 through 17, inclusive.
19. The statement, “[a]s the first Black woman in 34 years to seek a seat on Council”
is false in light of the fact that a Black woman ran for a Council seat in Emeryville in 2016.
20. Based on the foregoing, Petitioner is entitled to a writ of mandate pursuant to
Elections Code section 13313, subdivision (b)(2), striking the following language from the
candidate statement submitted by Ms. Welch: “As the first Black woman in 34 years to seek a
seat on Council.”
PRAYER
WHEREFORE, Petitioner prays:
1. That this Court issue a peremptory writ of mandate directing Respondents to
amend the candidate statement of Real Party in Interest Welch to delete the language : “As the
first Black woman in 34 years to seek a seat on Council” before the candidate statement is
included in the official election materials for the November 2, 2021 special election; and
13. 83578.0011334269158.4
- 6 -
PETITION FOR PEREMPTORY WRIT OF MANDATE
PURSUANT TO ELECTIONS CODE SECTION 13313 SUBDIVISION (B)(2)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
B
EST
B
EST
&
K
RIEGER
LLP
A
TTORNEYS
AT
L
AW
2001
N.
M
AIN
S
TREET
,
S
UITE
390
W
ALNUT
C
REEK
,
C
ALIFORNIA
94596
2. That this Court grant such other and further relief as may be just and proper.
Dated: August 11, 2021 BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP
By:
MALATHY SUBRAMANIAN
A. PATRICIA URSEA
EMILY CHAIDEZ
Attorneys for Petitioner
Sheri Hartz, City of Emeryville Elections
Official
14. 83578.0011334269158.4
- 7 -
PETITION FOR PEREMPTORY WRIT OF MANDATE
PURSUANT TO ELECTIONS CODE SECTION 13313 SUBDIVISION (B)(2)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
B
EST
B
EST
&
K
RIEGER
LLP
A
TTORNEYS
AT
L
AW
2001
N.
M
AIN
S
TREET
,
S
UITE
390
W
ALNUT
C
REEK
,
C
ALIFORNIA
94596
PROOF OF SERVICE
At the time of service I was over 18 years of age and not a party to this action. My
business address is 300 South Grand Avenue, 25th
Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90071. I am a resident
and/or employed in the county where the service occurred.
On August 11, 2021, I served the following document(s):
PETITION FOR PEREMPTORY WRIT OF MANDATE PURSUANT TO
ELECTIONS CODE SECTION 13313 SUBDIVISION (b)(2)
By United States mail. I caused the document(s) listed above to be placed in a
sealed envelope or package addressed to the persons at the addresses listed below..
I am a resident and/or employed in the county where the mailing occurred. The
envelope or package was placed in the mail at Los Angeles County, California.
Deposited the sealed envelope with the United States Postal Service, with
the postage fully prepaid.
Placed the envelope for collection and mailing, following our ordinary
business practices. I am readily familiar with this business's practice for
collecting and processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that
correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the
ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service, in a
sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid.
By Federal Express Overnight delivery. I caused the documents to be placed in
an envelope or package provided by Federal Express an overnight delivery carrier
and addressed to the persons at the addresses listed below. The envelope or
package were placed for collection and overnight delivery at an office or a
regularly utilized drop box of the overnight delivery carrier.
By e-mail or electronic transmission. Based on a court order or an agreement of
the parties to accept service by e-mail or electronic transmission, I caused the
documents to be sent to the persons at the e-mail addresses listed below. I did not
receive, within a reasonable time after the transmission, any electronic message or
other indication that the transmission was unsuccessful.
Raymond Lara
Office of the County Counsel
1221 Oak Street, Ste. 450
Oakland, CA 94612
Telephone: 510-272-6700
Email: raymond.lara@acgov.org
Counsel for Respondents
Courtney Welch
courtneyforemeryville@gmail.com
Real Party in Interest
15. 83578.0011334269158.4
- 8 -
PETITION FOR PEREMPTORY WRIT OF MANDATE
PURSUANT TO ELECTIONS CODE SECTION 13313 SUBDIVISION (B)(2)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
B
EST
B
EST
&
K
RIEGER
LLP
A
TTORNEYS
AT
L
AW
2001
N.
M
AIN
S
TREET
,
S
UITE
390
W
ALNUT
C
REEK
,
C
ALIFORNIA
94596
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above
is true and correct.
Executed on August 11, 2021, at Los Angeles, California.
_____________________________________
Joy Oates
16.
17. 83578.0011334269267.4
DECLARATION OF SHERI HARTZ
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
B
EST
B
EST
&
K
RIEGER
LLP
A
TTORNEYS
AT
L
AW
2001
N.
M
AIN
S
TREET
,
S
UITE
390
W
ALNUT
C
REEK
,
C
ALIFORNIA
94596
Declaration of Sheri Hartz
I, Sheri Hartz, declare as follows:
1. I am the City Clerk for the City of Emeryville, a municipal corporation organized
and existing under the laws of the State of California. As City Clerk, I am charged with
responsibility for preparing the candidates’ statements for inclusion with the voter information
pamphlet for the November 2, 2021 City Council special election for the City of Emeryville. I
have personal knowledge of the facts set forth in this declaration and could and would
competently testify thereto.
2. On August 4, 2021, Real Party in Interest Courtney Welch, a candidate for the
November 2, 2021 special election, submitted her papers and candidate statement. As part of that
submission, Ms. Welch signed a statement and took an oath affirming everything submitted was
true and correct. A true and correct copy of Ms. Welch’s candidate statement may be found
online at: https://www.ci.emeryville.ca.us/1094/Candidates, and a true and correct copy of a clip
of the City’s website bearing Ms. Welch’s statement is attached hereto as Exhibit 1.
3. Later that same day, Welch’s campaign contacted my office to advise that the
statement “[a]s the first Black woman in 34 years to seek a seat on Council” in Welch’s candidate
statement was false because another Black woman, Brynnda Collins, ran for a City Council seat
in Emeryville in 2016. A true and correct copy of the email from Welch’s campaign alerting my
office of the inaccuracy is attached hereto as Exhibit 2.
4. Upon being alerted of the error in the candidate statement, I confirmed that the
representation at issue is false.
5. The nominations period for the November 2, 2021 election closed on
August 6, 2021 at 5:00 p.m.
6. It is my understanding that the deadline for Respondents Alameda County Board
of Supervisors and Alameda County Registrar of Voters to finalize the voter information
pamphlet and related election materials and forward them for printing is August 27, 2021.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22. 1
From: Dyana Marie Delfin Polk <campaignmanagerdyana@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 4, 2021 4:37 PM
To: Sheri Hartz <shartz@emeryville.org>; Courtney Welch <courtneyforemeryville@gmail.com>; Andrea Visveshwara
<avisveshwara@emeryville.org>; Lorrayne Leong <lleong@emeryville.org>; Michael Guina <mguina@emeryville.org>;
Sheri Hartz <shartz@emeryville.org>
Subject: Re: [External] Error in Candidate Statement for Courtney Welch
Hi Sheri, upon further research, the candidate statement draft that was submitted contained a factual error. According
to Elections Code 13107, we cannot replace the statement, we can only withdraw. However, we interpret the Elections
Code to give the City Clerk the ability to allow changes only if a statement is known to be untrue. The portion of the
candidate statement that is factually incorrect is "As the first Black woman in 34 years to seek a seat on Council,.." This is
not true. Brynnda Collins ran for a city council seat in 2016, she is now President of the Emery USD School Board.
The candidate, Courtney Welch, signed a statement and took an oath that stated everything that was submitted was
true and correct. The campaign found out that the language provided in that sentence is in fact, factually incorrect and is
advising the City Clerk's office of this error as soon as it was made available to the campaign. We are recommending that
the language that is incorrect be stricken from the candidate statement. We understand that the candidate statements
are published for 10 days after the filing period and there is potential for someone to file a writ of mandamus against
the Clerk and name Courtney Welch as an interested party. The matter gets court priority, and if the facts are
determined to be inappropriate or untrue, the court could strike some or all of the statement itself. With the hopes of
avoiding that situation and to avoid offending a current elected official in Emeryville, we are requesting that the City
Clerk strike "As the first Black woman in 34 years to seek a seat on Council,.." from Courtney Welch's candidate
statement, as the Elections Code interpretation we are providing allows the City Clerk to do so.
We are copying the Emeryville City Attorney to get an opinion on this matter as well. We hope to resolve this matter
expeditiously.
Thank you,
On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 2:51 PM Dyana Marie Delfin Polk <campaignmanagerdyana@gmail.com> wrote:
Sheri, can we use the following language for Courtney's candidate statement? We submitted the wrong version in
error.
Courtney Welch
Policy Director
As a community advocate, a mom and housing champion, I am honored to run for Emeryville City Council. I am an
East Bay native and moved to Emeryville’s Christie Core neighborhood to raise my two sons. In a professional
capacity, I work on affordable housing policy and currently serve on Emeryville’s Housing Committee, working with
city and community partners to develop solutions to our housing crisis. In addition to my housing background, I am
also a former small business owner and prioritize economic and small business development while balancing public
health concerns during the COVID-19 pandemic. Additional priorities include increased public transit accessibility,
addressing public safety concerns, keeping our budget financially solvent and ensuring that Emeryville’s working
families are represented in government. I hope to earn your support.
24. 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
B
EST
B
EST
&
K
RIEGER
LLP
A
TTORNEYS
AT
L
AW
300
S
OUTH
G
RAND
A
VENUE
,
25
TH
F
LOOR
L
OS
A
NGELES
,
C
ALIFORNIA
90071
PROOF OF SERVICE
At the time of service I was over 18 years of age and not a party to this action. My
business address is 300 South Grand Avenue, 25th
Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90071. I am a resident
and/or employed in the county where the service occurred.
On August 11, 2021, I served the following document(s):
DECLARATION OF SHERI HARTZ
By United States mail. I caused the document(s) listed above to be placed in a
sealed envelope or package addressed to the persons at the addresses listed below..
I am a resident and/or employed in the county where the mailing occurred. The
envelope or package was placed in the mail at Los Angeles County, California.
Deposited the sealed envelope with the United States Postal Service, with
the postage fully prepaid.
Placed the envelope for collection and mailing, following our ordinary
business practices. I am readily familiar with this business's practice for
collecting and processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that
correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the
ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service, in a
sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid.
By Federal Express Overnight delivery. I caused the documents to be placed in
an envelope or package provided by Federal Express an overnight delivery carrier
and addressed to the persons at the addresses listed below. The envelope or
package were placed for collection and overnight delivery at an office or a
regularly utilized drop box of the overnight delivery carrier.
By e-mail or electronic transmission. Based on a court order or an agreement of
the parties to accept service by e-mail or electronic transmission, I caused the
documents to be sent to the persons at the e-mail addresses listed below. I did not
receive, within a reasonable time after the transmission, any electronic message or
other indication that the transmission was unsuccessful.
Raymond Lara
Office of the County Counsel
1221 Oak Street, Ste. 450
Oakland, CA 94612
Telephone: 510-272-6700
Email: raymond.lara@acgov.org
Counsel for Respondents
Courtney Welch
courtneyforemeryville@gmail.com
Real Party in Interest
27. 83578.0011334269395.5 - 2 -
DECLARATION OF COURTNEY WELCH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
B
EST
B
EST
&
K
RIEGER
LLP
A
TTORNEYS
AT
L
AW
2001
N.
M
AIN
S
TREET
,
S
UITE
390
W
ALNUT
C
REEK
,
C
ALIFORNIA
94596
Declaration of Courtney Welch
I, Courtney Welch, declare as follows:
1. I am a candidate for Emeryville City Council in the November 2, 2021 special
election. I have personal knowledge of the facts set forth in this declaration and could and would
competently testify thereto.
2. On August 4, 2021, my campaign submitted my candidacy papers, including my
candidate statement, to the City Clerk for the City of Emeryville (“Petitioner”), including an oath
signed by me that the materials submitted were true and correct. At the time, I believed the
contents of my candidate statement to be true.
3. Later the same day, my campaign discovered that the candidate statement I had
submitted contained a factual error. The portion of the candidate statement that is factually
incorrect is "As the first Black woman in 34 years to seek a seat on Council". In fact, Brynnda
Collins, who is also a Black woman, ran for an Emeryville City Council seat in 2016. Ms.
Collins is currently President of the Emery Unified School District School Board. A true and
correct clip of Ms. Collins’ biographical information from the Emery Unified School District
website is attached hereto as Exhibit 1. A true and correct copy of an election-related article
dated September 15, 2016, entitled “2016 Emeryville City Council Candidate Questionnaire:
Brynnda Collins,” is attached hereto as Exhibit 2.
4. Immediately upon discovering that the campaign statement contained this factual
error, my campaign contacted Petitioner to advise of the error. I understand that a candidate is
permitted by law only to withdraw, but not change, a candidate statement once it has been
submitted. My campaign therefore requested Petitioner bring this petition to seek a writ directing
that the factually inaccurate language be stricken from my candidate statement.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32. 8/9/2021 2016 Emeryville City Council Candidate Questionnaire: Brynnda Collins - The E'ville Eye Community News
https://evilleeye.com/news-commentary/politics/2016-emeryville-city-council-candidate-questionnaire-brynnda-collins/ 1/7
Search Here SEARCH
2016 EMERYVILLE CITY COUNCIL CANDIDATE QUESTIONNAIRE:
BRYNNDA COLLINS
Published On September 15, 2016 | By Rob Arias | 2016-Candidate Questionnaires, Election Coverage, Local
Government, News & Commentary, Politics
This 2016 Emeryville City Council election will see six candidates vying for three available seats in
what could see a shift in city priorities. The E’ville Eye distributed twenty questions covering a gamut
of relevant topics in our city to each candidate. Our hope is to help our readers better understand the
priorities of each candidate and see where they align with your own. Candidate Questionnaires will
be published daily over the next week in the order they will appear on the ballot which is determined
randomly by our Secretary of State (John Van Geffen, Louise Engel, Christian Patz, Brynnda
Collins, Ally Medina & John Bauters). Candidates have been instructed to provide answers no
longer than 250 words.
Next up is former EUSD employee Brynnda Collins. Collins is mother to recently appointed Emery
School Board Trustee Brittany Collins-Rogers. In addition to traffic, public safety, schools, small
businesses and tenant rights, Brynnda vows to make community building one of her top priorities.
“Using a proven track record for building networks and effective personal relationships, I intend to
accomplish creating a sense of family and bridging the gaps throughout our wonderful city”. If
elected, Brynnda would be the first female African-American Councilmember since Nellie Hannon
who served from 1983-87.
Brynnda Collins: Youth Development Coordinator
1). Please state your party affiliation (i.e. Democratic, Green Party, Republican, Independent,
Libertarian, etc.) and please list any campaign donations you’ve received or have been
pledged by PACs.
Democratic Party / Funding for my campaign has been raised by The Committee to Elect Brynnda
Collins in addition to donations from friends and family. Former Emeryville Mayor Kurt Brinkman has
been a great supporter.
SUPPORT LOCAL JOURNALISM
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
TIPS, IDEAS OR GUEST POSTS?
Submit your email to receive new post alerts, our
weekly digest and occasional special offers: *
SUBSCRIBE
SEND US A MESSAGE →
ABOUT NEWS & COMMENTARY CORONAVIRUS FOOD & DRINK HISTORY CALENDAR ADVERTISE SUPPORT US
If hyperlocal news is “essential” to
you, please consider making a one-
time or recurring contribution.
Support Hyperlocal News
33. 8/9/2021 2016 Emeryville City Council Candidate Questionnaire: Brynnda Collins - The E'ville Eye Community News
https://evilleeye.com/news-commentary/politics/2016-emeryville-city-council-candidate-questionnaire-brynnda-collins/ 2/7
2). How long have you lived in Emeryville, what has your involvement been with the city thus
far and what compelled you to run for council?
While living in Emeryville for the past 13 Years. I am deeply engaged in outreach with the Alameda
County Fire Dept., Emeryville Police Dept. and Emeryville’s Community Action Program as well as
spending many hours working with the city and schools. While sitting on the Traffic Planning
Committee, helping to form the COC (which is the body that oversees the expenses of the Center for
Community Life project) sitting on several city art committees and completing Emeryville’s Citizens
Police Academy I have received a deeper understanding of our community. I have been called to
action for council knowing that I have the ability to address issues within our community with positive
outcome.
3). What is your professional background and explain how this is applicable to local
government.
As a programs and project coordinator, I have demonstrated outstanding leadership skills by
participating on several committees throughout the city and for the school district. Including but not
limited to the Wellness Team, Instructional Leadership Team, the Response to Intervention and
Instruction Team, the School Site Council (chair), and the Parent-Teacher Organization (President).
As a participant of these teams, I was instrumental in making the decisions, planning, and facilitation
of the school redesign work for Emery Secondary and the Emery Unified School District. I have a
combined strong sense of character and leadership skills to make a positive impact on our city,
schools and community.
4). List your top-5 priorities in order, explain why and list one specific thing you intend to
accomplish in your four year term should you be elected.
Addressing our issues in regards to traffic, public safety, schools, small businesses, as well as
respecting the renters of Emeryville are some of my top priorities. These are some of our ongoing
issues in Emeryville in addition to creating greener space and bike safety. Using a proven track
record for building networks and effective personal relationships, I intend to accomplish creating a
sense of family and bridging the gaps throughout our wonderful city.
5). You hear people’s desires for a “vibrant community” thrown out a lot in political
discussions. What does a vibrant community mean to you?
A Vibrant community has many looks, they stem from the exterior of what we see on the outside to
how we feel on the inside. A vibrant community should also include love and kindness. Personal
connection and meeting the needs of our community is also a huge part of creating a vibrant
community.
6). Will you gather community input outside of the dais and if so, how (social media, your own
blog, guest posts on The E’ville Eye)? Would you be supportive of a neighborhood council to
better understand the perspectives of the different neighborhoods and demographics of our
city that don’t always have time to attend council meetings?
This question targets a huge area in which I intend to focus on. I feel a need to deepen our
community outreach, engagement and input. Yes, I most certainly will gather input targeting the
means in which it will take to reach our community. We must have a line of communicating in no less
than five areas of communications, in order to be inclusive of our community members. Social media
is a must now days to keep our communications progressive with today’s tech world. However, we
must always remember the community members that may not be tech savvy and resort to phone
calls, our postal service and good old word of mouth. I would be in full support of neighborhood
council and have recently been engaged in conversation in regards to needing transparency for
community to understand what’s taking place in our city if not able to attend meeting or study
sessions.
7). What do you think the most important outcome of the Sherwin Williams project is for our
city (i.e., the inclusion of ownership housing, maximizing the percentage of “affordable” units,
Parking & Traffic Mitigation, etc.)?
I firmly believe the project itself need to have an important outcome overall. Include i.e ownership
housing, affordable housing without segregation, green space, bike safety, safe hiking and walking
trails while offering safe connections and calm traffic.
8). The ECCL finally opened its doors after being in the works for more than a decade. Would
you (theoretically) have any reservations sending your children to a K-12 school? Will you
fight to retain Anna Yates Elementary as part of the EUSD?
My daughter was a student at a K-12 school from grade K-6, however, private and with much smaller
enrollment than offered through EUSD, I did have concerns with the high school students on the
OUR LOCAL SUPPORTERS
Community powered news made possible through the
generous contributions of:
34. 8/9/2021 2016 Emeryville City Council Candidate Questionnaire: Brynnda Collins - The E'ville Eye Community News
https://evilleeye.com/news-commentary/politics/2016-emeryville-city-council-candidate-questionnaire-brynnda-collins/ 3/7
same campus with the elementary age students. We relocated to Emeryville where she than moved
forward attending Emery Secondary. Again, I had reservations with the middle school being housed
on a high school campus. Seeking employment with the district offered me the opportunity in
assuring the health and welfare of not just my own student but of the overall student population. As a
member of the ECCL redesigning committee, I fought hard to retain Anna Yates Elementary as part
of EUSD strongly thinking that the large concerns and reservations expressed by the parents and
staff consolidating both schools should have been considered in the decision making process.
9). Can you reference any conversations you’ve had with the owners of any non-publicly
subsidized businesses in our city and do you get the sense that they’re thriving or struggling
and what their sentiment toward operating in our city is?
I have had several conversations in regards to the struggles some of the small business owners are
facing in Emeryville. One reference in particular has mentioned that in will not be feasible for her to
continue running her business in Emeryville much long with our minimum wage trajectory and Fair
Work Week. Her feeling expressed there has been a war waged on small businesses in Emeryville.
10). Is retaining and in fact growing our base of small businesses important to you and what
will you commit to doing to help small businesses thrive in our city if elected?
Retaining and growing small business help to create the strong sense of community that can be
offered throughout our city which will become more attractive to families. If elected I will commit and
keep our city from turning into large commercial space by reaching out to the small business
community, address their concerns and moving forward with action to make sure small business
owners know they too are part of community helping to create a vibrant city.
11). Governor Jerry Brown recently signed a $15 minimum wage into state law that includes
gradual increases and “off-ramps” in the event of economic consequences. If the impacts of
our local MWO are proven to have the negative impacts that were predicted by business,
would you be willing to “pause” ours and defer to the state model? Do you see the advantage
of a regional approach to passing economic policies?
If the impacts of our local MWO are proven to have the negative impacts predicted, I would be willing
to revisit ours and possibly deferring to the state model. I see advantages as well as disadvantages
and would like to see a study on regional competitiveness.
12). Our current council is looking to implement a scheduling & employment ordinance being
referred to as “Fair Work Week”. Do you support this ordinance? Do you foresee any
unintended consequences that could come from this?
Data from the “Fair Work Week” study session are reflecting no changes are needed. However,
several employees throughout the city have no idea the survey existed. After hearing story after story,
opinions and deep hearted feeling of both employers and employees we must focus on what will
work and what won’t. I realize some of the expressed issues need to be addressed on a case by
case basis. Employers are always going to need to make last minute changes needed to
accommodate real life events happening with employees as well as the stability of running their
business. On the other note employees have the right to fair working respectable hours with and
affordable wages. I foresee unintended consequences and hear talk of businesses leaving Emeryville
with the current ordinance. Our council should offer support that comforts employer and employee
fairness.
13). Do you feel being the “model city” for new legislation by labor groups puts our
businesses at a competitive disadvantage? Do you have any concerns that businesses will
choose neighboring cities instead of settling in Emeryville or of our city developing the
stigma of being labeled “Anti-Business”?
As stated in a previous question small businesses are starting to feel as if a war has been waged
against them in Emeryville. I have great concerns that businesses will choose neighboring cities.
14). I think a lot of us would like some form of “Rent Control” but achieving this in actuality is
complicated and limited. How can we maintain affordability in our city and protect existing
residents from getting priced out?
I have been looking into the affordable housing issue in Emeryville. It will take intensive work but
most certainly can take place in Emeryville as it does in joining cities. If elected I intend to form a
Rental/ Landlord Accountability Task Force for starters.
15). Which intersections do you think deserve the most attention in regards to Traffic
Mitigation and Bike/Ped safety?
After seeing someone on his bike get hit by a car just a few weeks ago I would say the area entering
and leaving Target need immediate mitigation.
RECENT COMMENTS
»
Rob, I know the pain you’re going
through. My beautiful......
Dan Craver »
I think you are correct, who
rescued who? So very......
Benay »
Your story is testimony that the
joy Fiona brought you......
35. 8/9/2021 2016 Emeryville City Council Candidate Questionnaire: Brynnda Collins - The E'ville Eye Community News
https://evilleeye.com/news-commentary/politics/2016-emeryville-city-council-candidate-questionnaire-brynnda-collins/ 4/7
16). Emeryville is consistently listed as one of the statistically most violent cities in the Bay
Area and crime in our city is on the rise (Much of this crime is petty theft attributed to our
shopping centers and auto burglaries because of this and our base of hotels). In terms of
public safety, what resources or legislation will you be supportive of to allow the EPD to do
their best job keeping our residents safe?
There has to be conversations with the EPD as to what supportive measures they feel should be
taken and the role they would need the council to play in assisting with public safety. I would
however, like to establish crime busters in every neighborhood where citizens are educated and
aware of suspicious behavior while learning how to safely reporting their observations without fear.
17). Homelessness is a regional and very complex issue. Encampments continue to pit
neighbors against the unhoused and create quality of life issues for residents. We know
“kicking them out” doesn’t solve anything … but neither does the status quo. What solutions
are you most supportive of and can you commit to working regionally with neighboring cities
to help alleviate this humanitarian crisis?
Homeless need to be addressed and quickly. I would like to work on using vacant space for housing
offering a work study program that will lead to self sufficiency.
18). We’ve often advocated for a “resident first” approach to policymaking meaning resident
considerations should come before outside special interest groups (such as Oakland-based
labor organizations) or at least negative impacts on residents should be divulged and
communicated. Do you agree or disagree with this and why?
I agree on resident first approach, although the views of special interest groups are valuable the
voice of the residence is what should count. We are the people who are the face of community and
have to live here while the special interest groups give their input they can’t call Emeryville home.
19). Civic participation and community spirit in Emeryville is sadly lacking. Do you have any
ideas to further community building in our town? Do you think resident retention and
ownership opportunities are important components to this equation?
Civic participation and community spirit most certainly needs attentions in Emeryville. By electing me
to council you will help to bridge the gaps and improve spirit in our city. I have many great ideas and I
am passionate about serving our children and elders and building the capacity of others to create
positive change. I am confident that my personal strength along with my strong background makes
me an excellent candidate to build community. Resident retention and ownership opportunities are
most certainly essential to community spirit.
20). A huge focus of our site is civic transparency and oversight. We’re in a unique position to
facilitate communication with our residents as Emeryville’s largest media outlet with an
estimated quarter of the population visiting our site regularly (and growing every year). Can
we get your guarantee that you’ll be responsive to our inquiries even in the event we disagree
on something?
I can guarantee that I will be responsive to your inquiries and firmly believe in transparency. In times
of agreement or disagreement the community has a right to know what’s going on throughout our city.
Follow Brynnda on her Facebook Page →
E’ville Eye Preliminary Readers Poll:
Based on what you know thus far, which three candidates will you vote for on November 8th?
John Van Geffen (Attorney / Father / Volunteer)
Louise Engel (Businesswoman / Urban Planner)
Christian Patz (Education Administrator)
Brynnda Collins (Youth Development Coordinator)
Ally Medina (Healthcare Worker Organizer)
John Bauters (Nonprofit Policy Director)
Vote
View Results
SUBMIT A COMMUNITY EVENT
ENTER EVENT INFO →
36. 8/9/2021 2016 Emeryville City Council Candidate Questionnaire: Brynnda Collins - The E'ville Eye Community News
https://evilleeye.com/news-commentary/politics/2016-emeryville-city-council-candidate-questionnaire-brynnda-collins/ 5/7
Share this:
Tweet
Share 36 Email
Share More
Like this:
Loading...
Related Stories:
Emeryville City Council 2016
Election Voter Guide
November 8, 2016
In "2016-Candidate
Questionnaires"
Emeryville Police Officers
Union endorses Louise Engel,
Brynnda Collins and John
Bauters for City Council
October 13, 2016
In "Election Coverage"
School Board Member
Christian Patz latest to declare
Council Bid as Election Period
officially begins
July 18, 2016
In "News & Commentary"
37. 8/9/2021 2016 Emeryville City Council Candidate Questionnaire: Brynnda Collins - The E'ville Eye Community News
https://evilleeye.com/news-commentary/politics/2016-emeryville-city-council-candidate-questionnaire-brynnda-collins/ 6/7
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
← Previous post Next post →
2 RESPONSES TO 2016 EMERYVILLE CITY COUNCIL CANDIDATE QUESTIONNAIRE: BRYNNDA
COLLINS
Rob Arias
is a third generation Californian and East Bay native who moved to Emeryville in
2003. A new parent in the community, he can often be seen walking his French Bulldog rescue
"Fiona" around his Park Avenue District neighborhood, traversing the greenway on his bike or
enjoying his favorite Emeryville small businesses. Rob's "day job" is as a creative
professional.
Richard Ambro, Ph.D. says:
September 27, 2016 at 3:54 pm
Brenda, It is critical that you get better known… beginning with plastering your smiling face all over.. do you
have campaign posters? A Black, renter CC candidate with an agenda should be welcome among renter
Emeryvilleans and Progressives. We need protection of Rent Control, Renter Justice, Diversity, and Working
Class Ethics. Our Emeryville City Council and City Government has been too Lilly-White. We desperately
need Blacks, Asians and Latinos/ Latinas in City Government.
Reply
Loading...
LEAVE A REPLY
Is Local News “Essential” to you?
If so, consider a one-time or recurring contribution to help support our local
journalists.
Support Hyperlocal News →
39. 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
B
EST
B
EST
&
K
RIEGER
LLP
A
TTORNEYS
AT
L
AW
300
S
OUTH
G
RAND
A
VENUE
,
25
TH
F
LOOR
L
OS
A
NGELES
,
C
ALIFORNIA
90071
PROOF OF SERVICE
At the time of service I was over 18 years of age and not a party to this action. My
business address is 300 South Grand Avenue, 25th
Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90071. I am a resident
and/or employed in the county where the service occurred.
On August 11, 2021, I served the following document(s):
DECLARATION OF COURTNEY WELCH
By United States mail. I caused the document(s) listed above to be placed in a
sealed envelope or package addressed to the persons at the addresses listed below..
I am a resident and/or employed in the county where the mailing occurred. The
envelope or package was placed in the mail at Los Angeles County, California.
Deposited the sealed envelope with the United States Postal Service, with
the postage fully prepaid.
Placed the envelope for collection and mailing, following our ordinary
business practices. I am readily familiar with this business's practice for
collecting and processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that
correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the
ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service, in a
sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid.
By Federal Express Overnight delivery. I caused the documents to be placed in
an envelope or package provided by Federal Express an overnight delivery carrier
and addressed to the persons at the addresses listed below. The envelope or
package were placed for collection and overnight delivery at an office or a
regularly utilized drop box of the overnight delivery carrier.
By e-mail or electronic transmission. Based on a court order or an agreement of
the parties to accept service by e-mail or electronic transmission, I caused the
documents to be sent to the persons at the e-mail addresses listed below. I did not
receive, within a reasonable time after the transmission, any electronic message or
other indication that the transmission was unsuccessful.
Raymond Lara
Office of the County Counsel
1221 Oak Street, Ste. 450
Oakland, CA 94612
Telephone: 510-272-6700
Email: raymond.lara@acgov.org
Counsel for Respondents
Courtney Welch
courtneyforemeryville@gmail.com
Real Party in Interest
43. 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
B
EST
B
EST
&
K
RIEGER
LLP
A
TTORNEYS
AT
L
AW
300
S
OUTH
G
RAND
A
VENUE
,
25
TH
F
LOOR
L
OS
A
NGELES
,
C
ALIFORNIA
90071
PROOF OF SERVICE
At the time of service I was over 18 years of age and not a party to this action. My
business address is 300 South Grand Avenue, 25th
Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90071. I am a resident
and/or employed in the county where the service occurred.
On August 11, 2021, I served the following document(s):
[PROPOSED] ORDER
By United States mail. I caused the document(s) listed above to be placed in a
sealed envelope or package addressed to the persons at the addresses listed below..
I am a resident and/or employed in the county where the mailing occurred. The
envelope or package was placed in the mail at Los Angeles County, California.
Deposited the sealed envelope with the United States Postal Service, with
the postage fully prepaid.
Placed the envelope for collection and mailing, following our ordinary
business practices. I am readily familiar with this business's practice for
collecting and processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that
correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the
ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service, in a
sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid.
By Federal Express Overnight delivery. I caused the documents to be placed in
an envelope or package provided by Federal Express an overnight delivery carrier
and addressed to the persons at the addresses listed below. The envelope or
package were placed for collection and overnight delivery at an office or a
regularly utilized drop box of the overnight delivery carrier.
By e-mail or electronic transmission. Based on a court order or an agreement of
the parties to accept service by e-mail or electronic transmission, I caused the
documents to be sent to the persons at the e-mail addresses listed below. I did not
receive, within a reasonable time after the transmission, any electronic message or
other indication that the transmission was unsuccessful.
Raymond Lara
Office of the County Counsel
1221 Oak Street, Ste. 450
Oakland, CA 94612
Telephone: 510-272-6700
Email: raymond.lara@acgov.org
Counsel for Respondents
Courtney Welch
courtneyforemeryville@gmail.com
Real Party in Interest
46. 83578.0011334269367.4 - 2 -
NOTICE AND EX PARTE APPLICATION
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
B
EST
B
EST
&
K
RIEGER
LLP
A
TTORNEYS
AT
L
AW
2001
N.
M
AIN
S
TREET
,
S
UITE
390
W
ALNUT
C
REEK
,
C
ALIFORNIA
94596
TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT, pursuant to California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1200 et
seq., Petitioner Sheri Hartz (“Petitioner”) hereby applies ex parte for issuance of a peremptory
writ of mandate requested in her Petition, filed concurrently, seeking that Respondents Alameda
County Board of Supervisors and Alameda County Registrar of Voters (“Respondents”) be
ordered to amend the candidate statement of Real Party in Interest Courtney Welch (“Ms.
Welch”) to delete a portion of the candidate statement that was discovered to be false.
Alternatively, Petitioner requests issuance of an alternative writ of mandate ordering Respondents
to show cause as to why the Court should not order the above-described amendment and setting a
briefing schedule and hearing date for a writ of mandate as soon as possible so as not to
substantially interfere with the printing and distribution of official election materials.
Per Emergency Local Rule 1.8(a)(h)(3), this ex-parte application may be set for a remote
hearing, if at all, on a date and time set by the Court.
This writ is sought under Elections Code sections 13313 and 13314 on the grounds that
Ms. Welch’s candidate statement contains false material and that a neglect of duty or an error or
omission will occur in the printing of the voters’ information pamphlet for the November 2, 2021
election without the requested deletion. If this ex parte relief is not granted, the public will be
irreparably harmed in that false material will be included in Ms. Welch’s candidate statement in
the voters’ information pamphlet.
This ex parte application is made pursuant to California Rule of Court (“CRC”) 3.1200 et
seq. Ex parte relief will ensure that the November 2, 2021 election and printing of related
materials may proceed according to schedule. As set forth in the attached Declarations of A.
Patricia Ursea and Andrea Visveshwara, notice of this ex parte application was provided to
counsel for Respondents and Ms. Welch as required by law and CRC 3.1203 and 3.1204. (See
attached Declarations of A. Patricia Ursea, ¶ 3 and Andrea Visveshwara, ¶ 2.)
Pursuant to CRC 3.1202(a), the parties or attorneys for the parties can be reached at the
following addresses, e-mail addresses, and phone numbers:
47. 83578.0011334269367.4 - 3 -
NOTICE AND EX PARTE APPLICATION
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
B
EST
B
EST
&
K
RIEGER
LLP
A
TTORNEYS
AT
L
AW
2001
N.
M
AIN
S
TREET
,
S
UITE
390
W
ALNUT
C
REEK
,
C
ALIFORNIA
94596
Respondents
Raymond Lara
Office of the County Counsel
1221 Oak ,St Ste 450, Oakland, CA 94612
510-272-6700
raymond.lara@acgov.org
Real Party in Interest
Courtney Welch
courtneyforemeryville@gmail.com
This ex parte application is made pursuant to CRC 3.1200 through 3.1207 on the grounds
that good cause exists for the requested relief as discussed above. It is based on this application,
the attached memorandum of points and authorities, the attached Declarations of A. Patricia
Ursea and Andrea Visveshwara, the pleadings and records on file with the Court in this matter,
and such further evidence and argument as the Court may choose to consider.
Dated: August 11, 2021 BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP
By:
MALATHY SUBRAMANIAN
A. PATRICIA URSEA
EMILY CHAIDEZ
Attorneys for Petitioner
Sheri Hartz, City of Emeryville Elections
Official
48. 83578.0011334269367.4 - 4 -
NOTICE AND EX PARTE APPLICATION
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
B
EST
B
EST
&
K
RIEGER
LLP
A
TTORNEYS
AT
L
AW
2001
N.
M
AIN
S
TREET
,
S
UITE
390
W
ALNUT
C
REEK
,
C
ALIFORNIA
94596
MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES
I. INTRODUCTION
Petitioner Sheri Hartz, in her capacity as City Clerk for the City of Emeryville and the
Elections Official for the City of Emeryville (“Petitioner”), submits this memorandum of points
and authorities in support of her ex parte application as follows:
After submission of her candidate statement in support of her candidacy for City Council
in the November 2, 2021 special election, Real Party in Interest Courtney Welch (“Ms. Welch”)
notified Petitioner that the submitted candidate statement contained false information.
Specifically, the statement included a representation that Ms. Welch was the first Black woman to
seek a seat on City Council in the last 34 years; in fact, another Black woman sought a seat on
City Council in 2016. California Elections Code permits a candidate to withdraw, but not change,
a candidate statement once it has been submitted. (Elec. Code § 13107.) The Elections Code also
provides for injunctive relief or the issuance of a peremptory writ of mandate striking false
information from a candidate statement upon clear and convincing proof that the material in
question is false. (Elec. Code § 13313, subd. (b).)
For the reasons set forth below, the Court should issue a writ of mandate directing
Respondents to delete the false statement in Ms. Welch’s candidate statement.
II. STATEMENT OF FACTS
As a candidate for Emeryville City Council in the November 2, 2021 special election to
fill a vacancy left a Council Member resignation, Ms. Welch submitted a candidate statement to
Petitioner on August 4, 2021 containing the following statement: “As the first Black woman in 34
years to seek a seat on Council,…”. (See Petition, ¶ 9.) Shortly after submitting the statement,
Ms. Welch’s campaign discovered the error and immediately contacted Petitioner to advise of the
error and request that the language be stricken from the statement. (Petition, ¶¶ 10-11.) On
August 6, 2021 at 5 p.m., the nominations period for the November 2, 2021 election closed.
(Petition, ¶ 13.) The deadline for Respondents Alameda County Board of Supervisors and
Alameda County Registrar of Voters (“Respondents”) to finalize the election materials and voter
information pamphlet for submission to the printers is August 27, 2021. (Petition, ¶ 14)
49. 83578.0011334269367.4 - 5 -
NOTICE AND EX PARTE APPLICATION
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
B
EST
B
EST
&
K
RIEGER
LLP
A
TTORNEYS
AT
L
AW
2001
N.
M
AIN
S
TREET
,
S
UITE
390
W
ALNUT
C
REEK
,
C
ALIFORNIA
94596
III. ARGUMENT
Elections Code section 13313, subdivision (b)(1) provides that during the 10-calendar-day
public examination period following the close of the nominations period, the elections official
“may seek a writ of mandate or an injunction requiring any or all of the material in the candidates
statements to be amended or deleted.” That section also provides that a “peremptory writ of
mandate or an injunction shall issue only upon clear and convincing proof that the material in
question is false…and that issuance of the writ or injunction will not substantially interfere with
the printing or distribution of official election materials.” (Elec. Code § 13313 (b)(2).)
Elections Code section 13307 sets forth the information to be included in a candidate’s
statement. In construing that section in light of an opposing candidate’s petition for a writ
seeking to delete certain paragraphs from another candidate’s statement, one court explained:
The language of section 13307 is unambiguous. “The statement may
include the name, age and occupation of the candidate and a brief
description...of the candidate's education and qualifications....” As
noted by the Supreme Court in Clark v. Burleigh (1992) 4 Cal.4th
474, 14 Cal.Rptr.2d 455, [t]he negative implication of this specific
list, of course, is that the Legislature did not intend the statutory
candidate’s statement to contain any other material: expressio unius
est exclusio alterius.
(Dean v. Superior Court of Orange County (1998) 62 Cal.App.4th 638, 641 [citations omitted].)
The court in Dean granted the petition, directing that the first three paragraphs of the
statement, which were dedicated to attacking his opponent’s qualifications, be stricken. (Id. at p.
642.) Similarly, a candidate statement containing false information must also be stricken where it
is challenged by petition and clear and convincing proof indicates the information is false. (Elec.
Code § 13313(b)(2).)
As shown below and in the Petition, the statement that Ms. Welch is the first Black
woman in 34 years to seek a seat on City Council is false and must be deleted. The same day Ms.
Welch submitted her candidate statement, her campaign contacted Petitioner to advise of the false
information. (Petition, ¶¶ 10-11.) In addition, Ms. Welch signed a declaration, filed with the
Petition, stating unequivocally that the information is false and attaching an article referencing the
candidacy of another Black woman in the 2016 election. (See Welch Decl., ¶ 3, Exs. 1 & 2.)
50. 83578.0011334269367.4 - 6 -
NOTICE AND EX PARTE APPLICATION
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
B
EST
B
EST
&
K
RIEGER
LLP
A
TTORNEYS
AT
L
AW
2001
N.
M
AIN
S
TREET
,
S
UITE
390
W
ALNUT
C
REEK
,
C
ALIFORNIA
94596
The portion of Ms. Welch’s candidate statement that is false should be deleted by order of
the Court. (Elec. Code § 13313(b)(2); see Dean, supra, 62 Cal.App.4th at 641.)
IV. CONCLUSION
For the foregoing reasons, Petitioner respectfully requests the Court order Respondents to
delete the aforementioned statement in the candidate statement of Ms. Welch.
Dated: August 11, 2021 BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP
By:
MALATHY SUBRAMANIAN
A. PATRICIA URSEA
EMILY CHAIDEZ
Attorneys for Petitioner
Sheri Hartz, City of Emeryville Elections
Official
51. 83578.0011334269367.4
- 7 -
NOTICE AND EX PARTE APPLICATION
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
B
EST
B
EST
&
K
RIEGER
LLP
A
TTORNEYS
AT
L
AW
2001
N.
M
AIN
S
TREET
,
S
UITE
390
W
ALNUT
C
REEK
,
C
ALIFORNIA
94596
DECLARATION OF A. PATRICIA URSEA
I, A. Patricia Ursea, declare as follows:
1. I am an attorney with the law firm of Best Best & Krieger, LLP, counsel of record
for Petitioner Sheri Hartz. I make this declaration in support of Petitioner’s ex parte application,
and I have personal knowledge of the facts set forth herein and could and would competently
testify thereto.
2. Petitioner filed this action on August 11, 2021. On that same day, Petitioner filed
this ex parte application.
3. Prior to filing the petition and this ex parte application, on August 10, 2021, I
notified counsel for Respondents Alameda County Board of Supervisors and Alameda County
Registrars of Voters via telephone that Petitioner was planning to file this ex parte application. I
left a voicemail. I sent e-mail notice on August 10, 2021 as well and counsel for Respondents
acknowledged receipt of that email on the same day.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the
foregoing is true and correct.
Executed this 11th day of August, 2021 at Los Angeles, California.
A. Patricia Ursea
52.
53. 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
B
EST
B
EST
&
K
RIEGER
LLP
A
TTORNEYS
AT
L
AW
300
S
OUTH
G
RAND
A
VENUE
,
25
TH
F
LOOR
L
OS
A
NGELES
,
C
ALIFORNIA
90071
PROOF OF SERVICE
At the time of service I was over 18 years of age and not a party to this action. My
business address is 300 South Grand Avenue, 25th
Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90071. I am a resident
and/or employed in the county where the service occurred.
On August 11, 2021, I served the following document(s):
NOTICE AND EX PARTE APPLICATION
By United States mail. I caused the document(s) listed above to be placed in a
sealed envelope or package addressed to the persons at the addresses listed below..
I am a resident and/or employed in the county where the mailing occurred. The
envelope or package was placed in the mail at Los Angeles County, California.
Deposited the sealed envelope with the United States Postal Service, with
the postage fully prepaid.
Placed the envelope for collection and mailing, following our ordinary
business practices. I am readily familiar with this business's practice for
collecting and processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that
correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the
ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service, in a
sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid.
By Federal Express Overnight delivery. I caused the documents to be placed in
an envelope or package provided by Federal Express an overnight delivery carrier
and addressed to the persons at the addresses listed below. The envelope or
package were placed for collection and overnight delivery at an office or a
regularly utilized drop box of the overnight delivery carrier.
By e-mail or electronic transmission. Based on a court order or an agreement of
the parties to accept service by e-mail or electronic transmission, I caused the
documents to be sent to the persons at the e-mail addresses listed below. I did not
receive, within a reasonable time after the transmission, any electronic message or
other indication that the transmission was unsuccessful.
Raymond Lara
Office of the County Counsel
1221 Oak Street, Ste. 450
Oakland, CA 94612
Telephone: 510-272-6700
Email: raymond.lara@acgov.org
Counsel for Respondents
Courtney Welch
courtneyforemeryville@gmail.com
Real Party in Interest