2017 09-12 roe's ustr submission exhibits index v2
•Download as DOCX, PDF•
0 likes•34 views
Ante el Comité de Personal de Política Comercial Subcomité sobre el Sistema de Preferencias Generalizadas Oficina del Representante de Comercio de los Estados Unidos
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
UNITED STATES' ABUSE OF THE 'SERIAL LITIGATOR' DEFENSE
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
This document has been prepared in support of DEPRIVATION OF JURY TRIAL(S) - i.e. as “For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury” – as set forth in the United States of America’s DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE. Furthermore, provides a copy of a Court Order FALSELY accusing Newsome of RACIAL and ANTI-SEMITIC SLURS for addressing for what are KNOWN to be Terrorist Acts, War Crimes, Apartheid Practices/Crimes Against Humanity, and other Criminal Acts launched against her by the United States of America’s NAZI’S and/or WHITE Jews/Zionists/Supremacists!
IMPORTANT TO NOTE: Are those WHO played ROLES in the FOUNDING of Israel as the Nazis and/or WHITE Jewish/Zionists/Supremacists Law Firms as Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz: https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/baker-donelson-founder-of-state-of-israel
The DENIAL of JURY TRIAL is also a defense that may be used in seeking INTERNATIONAL Judicial Review, INVESTIGATIONS and PROSECUTIONS, etc. – i.e. in taking matter(s) before INTERNATIONAL Tribunals!
Ex. 134
- The document is a letter from the Ecuadorian Attorney General's office responding to an order to attach $96 million that the Ecuadorian government allegedly owes to Chevron.
- The order was issued in relation to an arbitration award against Ecuador in favor of Chevron, but Ecuador is appealing the award. As such, there is no definitive debt owed to Chevron at this time.
- The Attorney General argues that the funds ordered for attachment are protected and not subject to attachment under Ecuadorian law. He asks that the order be revoked.
Ex. 133
This document is an award from the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal regarding claims brought by SEDCO, Inc. against the National Iranian Oil Company and Iran. SEDCO leased drilling rigs to NIOC through its subsidiary SISA. SEDCO alleges that after contract termination in 1979, NIOC appropriated the rigs by failing to assist with export as required and continuing to operate the rigs in Iran. NIOC argues it did not take possession of the rigs until 1980 and was only obligated to use best efforts to help with export. The tribunal must determine whether NIOC's actions around contract termination and after amounted to a taking of the rigs for which compensation is due.
Ex. 132
The Tribunal was seized with requests from both parties regarding interim measures and jurisdiction. Regarding interim measures, the Tribunal ordered an expert to commence inventorying goods stored by Claimant and transferred some goods to a more suitable warehouse. The Tribunal also ordered Respondents to deposit additional funds to cover expert costs. However, the Tribunal declined to fully grant Respondents' request to transfer all goods, reserving final jurisdiction determination. The Tribunal invited both parties to submit evidence on jurisdiction by a set deadline.
Ex. 131
Este documento presenta la declaración suplementaria de Fabián Andrade Narváez sobre la ley ecuatoriana en respuesta a los informes de los expertos de Chevron. Andrade concluye lo siguiente: 1) La ley ecuatoriana permite atravesar el velo corporativo en circunstancias excepcionales para prevenir fraude; 2) La ley ecuatoriana establece una presunción de responsabilidad para actividades peligrosas como las hidrocarburíferas; 3) La ley permite la acumulación de demandas civ
Ex. 130
1) El documento presenta la declaración de tres expertos en derecho ecuatoriano que buscan corregir errores en la interpretación de la ley ecuatoriana realizada por abogados de Texaco. 2) Explican que, según la ley ecuatoriana, el Estado solo puede adoptar obligaciones contractuales de forma expresa y por escrito. La doctrina del "estoppel" no se aplica. 3) Argumen que las actividades de CEPE relacionadas con hidrocarburos son de carácter público y sus actos y contratos se rigen por derecho público
Ex. 129
The Republic of Ecuador informs the Tribunal that on February 17, 2012, the Sole Division of the Provincial Court of Sucumbíos declared the judgment against Chevron in the Lago Agrio case to be enforceable under Ecuadorian law. The Court denied Chevron's request to suspend enforceability pending appeal or require Chevron to post a bond. The Court examined its obligations under the Tribunal's First Interim Award and international human rights treaties and found the treaties prevailed. The Republic provided the original Spanish decision and English translation.
Ex. 128
The Respondent informs the Tribunal that it has taken measures to implement the Interim Award issued on January 25, 2011. Specifically, the Attorney General of Ecuador issued notices of the Award on January 26, 2011 to the President of Ecuador, Judiciary Council, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and appellate judges. Given the transition of judges at the National Court, notice was sent to its President on January 31. Through these official communications, the various branches of the Ecuadorian State were notified of the Interim Award and directed to suspend enforcement or recognition of any judgments against Chevron.
Recommended
UNITED STATES' ABUSE OF THE 'SERIAL LITIGATOR' DEFENSE
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
This document has been prepared in support of DEPRIVATION OF JURY TRIAL(S) - i.e. as “For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury” – as set forth in the United States of America’s DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE. Furthermore, provides a copy of a Court Order FALSELY accusing Newsome of RACIAL and ANTI-SEMITIC SLURS for addressing for what are KNOWN to be Terrorist Acts, War Crimes, Apartheid Practices/Crimes Against Humanity, and other Criminal Acts launched against her by the United States of America’s NAZI’S and/or WHITE Jews/Zionists/Supremacists!
IMPORTANT TO NOTE: Are those WHO played ROLES in the FOUNDING of Israel as the Nazis and/or WHITE Jewish/Zionists/Supremacists Law Firms as Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz: https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/baker-donelson-founder-of-state-of-israel
The DENIAL of JURY TRIAL is also a defense that may be used in seeking INTERNATIONAL Judicial Review, INVESTIGATIONS and PROSECUTIONS, etc. – i.e. in taking matter(s) before INTERNATIONAL Tribunals!
Ex. 134
- The document is a letter from the Ecuadorian Attorney General's office responding to an order to attach $96 million that the Ecuadorian government allegedly owes to Chevron.
- The order was issued in relation to an arbitration award against Ecuador in favor of Chevron, but Ecuador is appealing the award. As such, there is no definitive debt owed to Chevron at this time.
- The Attorney General argues that the funds ordered for attachment are protected and not subject to attachment under Ecuadorian law. He asks that the order be revoked.
Ex. 133
This document is an award from the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal regarding claims brought by SEDCO, Inc. against the National Iranian Oil Company and Iran. SEDCO leased drilling rigs to NIOC through its subsidiary SISA. SEDCO alleges that after contract termination in 1979, NIOC appropriated the rigs by failing to assist with export as required and continuing to operate the rigs in Iran. NIOC argues it did not take possession of the rigs until 1980 and was only obligated to use best efforts to help with export. The tribunal must determine whether NIOC's actions around contract termination and after amounted to a taking of the rigs for which compensation is due.
Ex. 132
The Tribunal was seized with requests from both parties regarding interim measures and jurisdiction. Regarding interim measures, the Tribunal ordered an expert to commence inventorying goods stored by Claimant and transferred some goods to a more suitable warehouse. The Tribunal also ordered Respondents to deposit additional funds to cover expert costs. However, the Tribunal declined to fully grant Respondents' request to transfer all goods, reserving final jurisdiction determination. The Tribunal invited both parties to submit evidence on jurisdiction by a set deadline.
Ex. 131
Este documento presenta la declaración suplementaria de Fabián Andrade Narváez sobre la ley ecuatoriana en respuesta a los informes de los expertos de Chevron. Andrade concluye lo siguiente: 1) La ley ecuatoriana permite atravesar el velo corporativo en circunstancias excepcionales para prevenir fraude; 2) La ley ecuatoriana establece una presunción de responsabilidad para actividades peligrosas como las hidrocarburíferas; 3) La ley permite la acumulación de demandas civ
Ex. 130
1) El documento presenta la declaración de tres expertos en derecho ecuatoriano que buscan corregir errores en la interpretación de la ley ecuatoriana realizada por abogados de Texaco. 2) Explican que, según la ley ecuatoriana, el Estado solo puede adoptar obligaciones contractuales de forma expresa y por escrito. La doctrina del "estoppel" no se aplica. 3) Argumen que las actividades de CEPE relacionadas con hidrocarburos son de carácter público y sus actos y contratos se rigen por derecho público
Ex. 129
The Republic of Ecuador informs the Tribunal that on February 17, 2012, the Sole Division of the Provincial Court of Sucumbíos declared the judgment against Chevron in the Lago Agrio case to be enforceable under Ecuadorian law. The Court denied Chevron's request to suspend enforceability pending appeal or require Chevron to post a bond. The Court examined its obligations under the Tribunal's First Interim Award and international human rights treaties and found the treaties prevailed. The Republic provided the original Spanish decision and English translation.
Ex. 128
The Respondent informs the Tribunal that it has taken measures to implement the Interim Award issued on January 25, 2011. Specifically, the Attorney General of Ecuador issued notices of the Award on January 26, 2011 to the President of Ecuador, Judiciary Council, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and appellate judges. Given the transition of judges at the National Court, notice was sent to its President on January 31. Through these official communications, the various branches of the Ecuadorian State were notified of the Interim Award and directed to suspend enforcement or recognition of any judgments against Chevron.
Ex. 127
El juez Lilia Marlene Ortiz Vásquez emitió una orden en un caso judicial entre María Aguinada y otros contra Adolfo Callejas Rivadeneira. La orden aprueba el informe del liquidadora de costas y ordena a Chevron Corporation a pagar $19,041,414,529 dólares estadounidenses o entregar propiedad equivalente en un plazo de 24 horas para satisfacer la sentencia. El juez también rechazó varias mociones presentadas por la defensa.
Ex. 126
This letter from King & Spalding LLP to members of an arbitration tribunal requests interim measures in an ongoing arbitration between Chevron Corporation, Texaco Petroleum Company, and the Republic of Ecuador. It summarizes recent developments in related litigation in Ecuadorian courts, including the issuance of an order finalizing the evidence period and allowing for imminent judgment, as well as newly discovered evidence of plans by opposing parties to immediately attach assets and disrupt Chevron's global operations. The letter argues interim measures are urgently needed to protect the arbitration tribunal's jurisdiction and ability to provide meaningful relief by suspending enforceability of any imminent Ecuadorian court judgment.
Ex. 125
1) The Inter-American Convention on Letters Rogatory establishes procedures for transmitting and executing letters rogatory, or requests for judicial assistance, between member states of the Organization of American States for civil and commercial matters.
2) Letters rogatory must meet certain requirements like being properly legalized and translated before they can be executed. They can be transmitted through judicial, diplomatic, or central authority channels.
3) The convention provides rules for how letters rogatory will be executed according to the laws of the receiving state and allocates responsibility for costs. It also allows some flexibility if requested by the issuing state.
Ex. 124
This document outlines an international convention to abolish the requirement of legalization for foreign public documents. Key points:
1) It applies to public documents produced between contracting states, including documents from courts/tribunals, administrative documents, notarial acts, and official certificates.
2) Each state will exempt covered documents from legalization requirements. Legalization refers only to certifying authenticity of signatures and authority of those signing.
3) An apostille certificate placed on the document is the only formality required between contracting states to certify authenticity and authority. This simplifies legalization requirements.
Ex. 123
The document summarizes proceedings in the Provincial Court of Justice of Sucumbíos regarding enforcement of an environmental judgment against Chevron. It orders the expansion of trademarks attached to include additional Chevron and Texaco brands. It denies Chevron's request to revoke the enforcement order, finding the arguments on jurisdiction and alleged procedural flaws have already been rejected in prior rulings. It authorizes letters rogatory to be sent to foreign authorities to aid enforcement efforts against Chevron abroad.
Ex. 122
Case Concerning Avena and Other Mexican Nationals (Mexico v. United States of America), International Court of Justice, Order on Request for the Indication of Provisional Measures (Feb. 5, 2003)
Ex. 121
Supreme Court Decision, First Civil and Commercial Chamber, Cassation File No. 83, Official Registry Supplement 323, May 10, 2001
Ex. 120
Supreme Court of Justice, First Civil and Commercial Chamber, Cassation File No. 162, Official Register 664, Sept. 17, 2002
Ex. 119
Este documento presenta la Ley para el Juzgamiento de la Colusión de 1977. La ley establece procedimientos para procesar actos colusorios fraudulentos entre dos o más personas con el objetivo de causar daño a terceros. La ley otorga jurisdicción a los jueces civiles y comerciales para procesar casos de colusión y establece procedimientos de apelación. También invalida actos afectados por colusión y ordena restaurar la situación anterior.
Ex. 117
Navarrete v. Carbo, Supreme Court of Justice, First Civil and Commercial Chamber, Official Gazette No. 14, Nov. 10, 2003
Ex. 116
1) El documento presenta la declaración jurídica de Fabián Andrade Narváez, un experto ecuatoriano, sobre varias alegaciones de errores judiciales y violaciones al debido proceso en el litigio de Lago Agrio.
2) Andrade Narváez resume sus conclusiones sobre temas como el momento para adjudicar defensas preliminares, la supuesta unión inapropiada de demandas, los alegados desvíos del procedimiento aplicable en conexión con las inspecciones judiciales, la aplicación retroactiva alegada de la LMA
Ex. 115
Este documento presenta extractos del Código de Procedimiento Civil de 1987 de Ecuador. Establece reglas sobre diferentes aspectos del proceso judicial civil, incluyendo procedimientos ordinarios y especiales, presentación de pruebas y evidencia, nombramiento y rol de peritos, y emisión de sentencias.
Ex. 114
Petition for Precautionary Measures against Ecuador in the Inter-American Commission for Human Rights filed by Lago Agrio Plaintiffs (Feb. 9, 2012)
Ex. 113
Roy E. Hofer, Supreme Court Reversal Rates: Evaluating the Federal Courts of Appeals, LANDSLIDE, Jan. – Feb. 2010, available at https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/migrated/intelprop/magazine/LandslideJan2010_Hofer.authcheckdam.pdf
Ex. 112
Ms. María Gabriela Albuja
WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
1700 K Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20006
U.S.A.
Mr. Ricardo Ugarte
Mr. Bruno D. Leurent
WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
200 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10166
U.S.A.
Mr. Mark Clodfelter
FOLEY HOAG LLP
1875 K Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20006
U.S.A.
UNCITRAL Chevron-Texaco v. Ecuador Final Award 12
The Claimants
Ex. 111
This document is Claimants' Memorial on the Merits in an arbitration between Chevron Corporation, Texaco Petroleum Company, and the Republic of Ecuador. It summarizes that:
1) TexPet invested in Ecuador's oil industry in the 1960s under agreements requiring Ecuador to pay international prices for oil and limiting excess oil contributions. However, Ecuador violated the agreements and delayed related lawsuits by TexPet for over 14 years.
2) In 2004, Ecuador purged its judiciary of independent judges, destroying judicial independence. The new politicized judges further delayed rulings in TexPet's cases.
3) Having denied TexPet justice, Ecuador breached its obligations under customary international law, its treaty with
Ex. 110
This letter from the tribunal requests additional information from both parties regarding Ecuador's application to dissolve three interim arbitration awards in the dispute between Chevron and Ecuador. Specifically, the tribunal asks Chevron to provide more details on enforcement proceedings outside of Canada, Brazil and Argentina. It also asks Ecuador to comment on Chevron's description of the progress of enforcement proceedings in those three countries. Finally, both parties are requested to address a recent decision by The Hague Court of Appeal relevant to Ecuador's application and provide copies of that decision in Dutch and English if possible.
Ex. 109
This letter from Ecuador responds to the Tribunal's request for comments on Chevron's account of enforcement proceedings in Canada, Brazil, and Argentina related to the Lago Agrio judgment. Ecuador argues that the interim awards should be terminated because Chevron faces no imminent threat of irreparable harm, as Chevron claimed in 2012 to obtain the interim awards. Ecuador details the status and likely timelines of the pending enforcement actions, arguing that none will result in imminent asset seizures or irreparable harm to Chevron. Ecuador also notes that enforcement of the judgment is now legally impossible in the US, where Chevron apparently has direct assets. Therefore, Ecuador asserts, good cause exists to dissolve the interim awards.
Ex. 107
Benoit Le Bars & Tejas Shiroor, Provisional Measures in Investment Arbitration: Wading Through the Murky Waters of Enforcement, 6 INDIAN J. ARB. L. 1, 27 (2017)
CBO's Immigration Projections - Presentation
Presentation by Julie Topoleski, CBO’s Director of Labor, Income Security, and Long-Term Analysis, at the 16th Annual Meeting of the OECD Working Party of Parliamentary Budget Officials and Independent Fiscal Institutions.
More Related Content
More from Embajada del Ecuador en Washington
Ex. 127
El juez Lilia Marlene Ortiz Vásquez emitió una orden en un caso judicial entre María Aguinada y otros contra Adolfo Callejas Rivadeneira. La orden aprueba el informe del liquidadora de costas y ordena a Chevron Corporation a pagar $19,041,414,529 dólares estadounidenses o entregar propiedad equivalente en un plazo de 24 horas para satisfacer la sentencia. El juez también rechazó varias mociones presentadas por la defensa.
Ex. 126
This letter from King & Spalding LLP to members of an arbitration tribunal requests interim measures in an ongoing arbitration between Chevron Corporation, Texaco Petroleum Company, and the Republic of Ecuador. It summarizes recent developments in related litigation in Ecuadorian courts, including the issuance of an order finalizing the evidence period and allowing for imminent judgment, as well as newly discovered evidence of plans by opposing parties to immediately attach assets and disrupt Chevron's global operations. The letter argues interim measures are urgently needed to protect the arbitration tribunal's jurisdiction and ability to provide meaningful relief by suspending enforceability of any imminent Ecuadorian court judgment.
Ex. 125
1) The Inter-American Convention on Letters Rogatory establishes procedures for transmitting and executing letters rogatory, or requests for judicial assistance, between member states of the Organization of American States for civil and commercial matters.
2) Letters rogatory must meet certain requirements like being properly legalized and translated before they can be executed. They can be transmitted through judicial, diplomatic, or central authority channels.
3) The convention provides rules for how letters rogatory will be executed according to the laws of the receiving state and allocates responsibility for costs. It also allows some flexibility if requested by the issuing state.
Ex. 124
This document outlines an international convention to abolish the requirement of legalization for foreign public documents. Key points:
1) It applies to public documents produced between contracting states, including documents from courts/tribunals, administrative documents, notarial acts, and official certificates.
2) Each state will exempt covered documents from legalization requirements. Legalization refers only to certifying authenticity of signatures and authority of those signing.
3) An apostille certificate placed on the document is the only formality required between contracting states to certify authenticity and authority. This simplifies legalization requirements.
Ex. 123
The document summarizes proceedings in the Provincial Court of Justice of Sucumbíos regarding enforcement of an environmental judgment against Chevron. It orders the expansion of trademarks attached to include additional Chevron and Texaco brands. It denies Chevron's request to revoke the enforcement order, finding the arguments on jurisdiction and alleged procedural flaws have already been rejected in prior rulings. It authorizes letters rogatory to be sent to foreign authorities to aid enforcement efforts against Chevron abroad.
Ex. 122
Case Concerning Avena and Other Mexican Nationals (Mexico v. United States of America), International Court of Justice, Order on Request for the Indication of Provisional Measures (Feb. 5, 2003)
Ex. 121
Supreme Court Decision, First Civil and Commercial Chamber, Cassation File No. 83, Official Registry Supplement 323, May 10, 2001
Ex. 120
Supreme Court of Justice, First Civil and Commercial Chamber, Cassation File No. 162, Official Register 664, Sept. 17, 2002
Ex. 119
Este documento presenta la Ley para el Juzgamiento de la Colusión de 1977. La ley establece procedimientos para procesar actos colusorios fraudulentos entre dos o más personas con el objetivo de causar daño a terceros. La ley otorga jurisdicción a los jueces civiles y comerciales para procesar casos de colusión y establece procedimientos de apelación. También invalida actos afectados por colusión y ordena restaurar la situación anterior.
Ex. 117
Navarrete v. Carbo, Supreme Court of Justice, First Civil and Commercial Chamber, Official Gazette No. 14, Nov. 10, 2003
Ex. 116
1) El documento presenta la declaración jurídica de Fabián Andrade Narváez, un experto ecuatoriano, sobre varias alegaciones de errores judiciales y violaciones al debido proceso en el litigio de Lago Agrio.
2) Andrade Narváez resume sus conclusiones sobre temas como el momento para adjudicar defensas preliminares, la supuesta unión inapropiada de demandas, los alegados desvíos del procedimiento aplicable en conexión con las inspecciones judiciales, la aplicación retroactiva alegada de la LMA
Ex. 115
Este documento presenta extractos del Código de Procedimiento Civil de 1987 de Ecuador. Establece reglas sobre diferentes aspectos del proceso judicial civil, incluyendo procedimientos ordinarios y especiales, presentación de pruebas y evidencia, nombramiento y rol de peritos, y emisión de sentencias.
Ex. 114
Petition for Precautionary Measures against Ecuador in the Inter-American Commission for Human Rights filed by Lago Agrio Plaintiffs (Feb. 9, 2012)
Ex. 113
Roy E. Hofer, Supreme Court Reversal Rates: Evaluating the Federal Courts of Appeals, LANDSLIDE, Jan. – Feb. 2010, available at https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/migrated/intelprop/magazine/LandslideJan2010_Hofer.authcheckdam.pdf
Ex. 112
Ms. María Gabriela Albuja
WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
1700 K Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20006
U.S.A.
Mr. Ricardo Ugarte
Mr. Bruno D. Leurent
WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
200 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10166
U.S.A.
Mr. Mark Clodfelter
FOLEY HOAG LLP
1875 K Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20006
U.S.A.
UNCITRAL Chevron-Texaco v. Ecuador Final Award 12
The Claimants
Ex. 111
This document is Claimants' Memorial on the Merits in an arbitration between Chevron Corporation, Texaco Petroleum Company, and the Republic of Ecuador. It summarizes that:
1) TexPet invested in Ecuador's oil industry in the 1960s under agreements requiring Ecuador to pay international prices for oil and limiting excess oil contributions. However, Ecuador violated the agreements and delayed related lawsuits by TexPet for over 14 years.
2) In 2004, Ecuador purged its judiciary of independent judges, destroying judicial independence. The new politicized judges further delayed rulings in TexPet's cases.
3) Having denied TexPet justice, Ecuador breached its obligations under customary international law, its treaty with
Ex. 110
This letter from the tribunal requests additional information from both parties regarding Ecuador's application to dissolve three interim arbitration awards in the dispute between Chevron and Ecuador. Specifically, the tribunal asks Chevron to provide more details on enforcement proceedings outside of Canada, Brazil and Argentina. It also asks Ecuador to comment on Chevron's description of the progress of enforcement proceedings in those three countries. Finally, both parties are requested to address a recent decision by The Hague Court of Appeal relevant to Ecuador's application and provide copies of that decision in Dutch and English if possible.
Ex. 109
This letter from Ecuador responds to the Tribunal's request for comments on Chevron's account of enforcement proceedings in Canada, Brazil, and Argentina related to the Lago Agrio judgment. Ecuador argues that the interim awards should be terminated because Chevron faces no imminent threat of irreparable harm, as Chevron claimed in 2012 to obtain the interim awards. Ecuador details the status and likely timelines of the pending enforcement actions, arguing that none will result in imminent asset seizures or irreparable harm to Chevron. Ecuador also notes that enforcement of the judgment is now legally impossible in the US, where Chevron apparently has direct assets. Therefore, Ecuador asserts, good cause exists to dissolve the interim awards.
Ex. 107
Benoit Le Bars & Tejas Shiroor, Provisional Measures in Investment Arbitration: Wading Through the Murky Waters of Enforcement, 6 INDIAN J. ARB. L. 1, 27 (2017)
More from Embajada del Ecuador en Washington (20)
Recently uploaded
CBO's Immigration Projections - Presentation
Presentation by Julie Topoleski, CBO’s Director of Labor, Income Security, and Long-Term Analysis, at the 16th Annual Meeting of the OECD Working Party of Parliamentary Budget Officials and Independent Fiscal Institutions.
G7 Apulia Leaders Communique, June 2024 (1).pdf
G7 Apulia Leaders Communique, 14th June 2024
"The present Canon of the West"
在线办理美国乔治华盛顿大学毕业证（gwu毕业证书）学历学位证书原版一模一样
原版一模一样【微信：741003700 】【美国乔治华盛顿大学毕业证（gwu毕业证书）学历学位证书】【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原海外各大学 Bachelor Diploma degree, Master Degree Diploma
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
一比一原版英国阿伯丁大学毕业证(AU毕业证书)学历如何办理
退学办理文凭【微信号:176555708】【(AU毕业证书)】【微信号:176555708】《成绩单、外壳、offer、真实留信官方学历认证（永久存档/真实可查）》采用学校原版纸张、特殊工艺完全按照原版一比一制作（包括：隐形水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠，文字图案浮雕，激光镭射，紫外荧光，温感，复印防伪）行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备，十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，业务范围有加拿大、英国、澳洲、韩国、美国、新加坡，新西兰等学历材料，包您满意。
【我们承诺采用的是学校原版纸张（纸质、底色、纹路）我们拥有全套进口原装设备，特殊工艺都是采用不同机器制作，仿真度基本可以达到100%，所有工艺效果都可提前给客户展示，不满意可以根据客户要求进行调整，直到满意为止！】
【业务选择办理准则】
一、工作未确定，回国需先给父母、亲戚朋友看下文凭的情况，办理一份就读学校的毕业证【微信号:176555708】文凭即可
二、回国进私企、外企、自己做生意的情况，这些单位是不查询毕业证真伪的，而且国内没有渠道去查询国外文凭的真假，也不需要提供真实教育部认证。鉴于此，办理一份毕业证【微信号:176555708】即可
三、进国企，银行，事业单位，考公务员等等，这些单位是必需要提供真实教育部认证的，办理教育部认证所需资料众多且烦琐，所有材料您都必须提供原件，我们凭借丰富的经验，快捷的绿色通道帮您快速整合材料，让您少走弯路。
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
留信网服务项目：
1、留学生专业人才库服务（留信分析）
2、国（境）学习人员提供就业推荐信服务
3、留学人员区块链存储服务
【关于价格问题（保证一手价格）】
我们所定的价格是非常合理的，而且我们现在做得单子大多数都是代理和回头客户介绍的所以一般现在有新的单子 我给客户的都是第一手的代理价格，因为我想坦诚对待大家 不想跟大家在价格方面浪费时间
对于老客户或者被老客户介绍过来的朋友，我们都会适当给一些优惠。
选择实体注册公司办理，更放心，更安全！我们的承诺：客户在留信官方认证查询网站查询到认证通过结果后付款，不成功不收费！
AHMR volume 10 number 1 January-April 2024
AHMR is an interdisciplinary peer-reviewed online journal created to encourage and facilitate the study of all aspects (socio-economic, political, legislative and developmental) of Human Mobility in Africa. Through the publication of original research, policy discussions and evidence research papers AHMR provides a comprehensive forum devoted exclusively to the analysis of contemporaneous trends, migration patterns and some of the most important migration-related issues.
How To Cultivate Community Affinity Throughout The Generosity Journey
This session will dive into how to create rich generosity experiences that foster long-lasting relationships. You’ll walk away with actionable insights to redefine how you engage with your supporters — emphasizing trust, engagement, and community!
G7 Apulia Leaders Communique, 14th June 2024
G7 Apulia Leaders Communique, June 2024
" The present Canon of the West"
2024: The FAR - Federal Acquisition Regulations, Part 42
Jennifer Schaus and Associates hosts a complimentary webinar series on The FAR in 2024. Join the webinars on Wednesdays and Fridays at noon, eastern.
Recordings are on YouTube and the company website.
https://www.youtube.com/@jenniferschaus/videos
一比一原版(theauckland毕业证书)新西兰奥克兰大学毕业证成绩单如何办理
原版定制【微信:741003700】《(theauckland毕业证书)新西兰奥克兰大学毕业证学位证成绩单》【微信:741003700】成绩单 、雅思、外壳、留信学历认证永久存档查询，采用学校原版纸张、特殊工艺完全按照原版一比一制作（包括：隐形水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠，文字图案浮雕，激光镭射，紫外荧光，温感，复印防伪）行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备，十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，业务范围有加拿大、英国、澳洲、韩国、美国、新加坡，新西兰等学历材料，包您满意。
【业务选择办理准则】
一、工作未确定，回国需先给父母、亲戚朋友看下文凭的情况，办理一份毕业证【Q微信741003700】文凭即可
二、回国进私企、外企、自己做生意的情况，这些单位是不查询毕业证真伪的，而且国内没有渠道去查询国外文凭的真假，也不需要提供真实教育部认证。鉴于此，办理一份毕业证【Q微信741003700】即可
三、进国企，银行，事业单位，考公务员等等，这些单位是必需要提供真实教育部认证的，办理教育部认证所需资料众多且烦琐，所有材料您都必须提供原件，我们凭借丰富的经验，快捷的绿色通道帮您快速整合材料，让您少走弯路。
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
【关于价格问题（保证一手价格）】
我们所定的价格是非常合理的，而且我们现在做得单子大多数都是代理和回头客户介绍的所以一般现在有新的单子 我给客户的都是第一手的代理价格，因为我想坦诚对待大家 不想跟大家在价格方面浪费时间
对于老客户或者被老客户介绍过来的朋友，我们都会适当给一些优惠。
Indira awas yojana housing scheme renamed as PMAY
Indira Awas Yojana (IAY) played a significant role in addressing rural housing needs in India. It emerged as a comprehensive program for affordable housing solutions in rural areas, predating the government’s broader focus on mass housing initiatives.
Bharat Mata - History of Indian culture.pdf
Bharat Mata Channel is an initiative towards keeping the culture of this country alive. Our effort is to spread the knowledge of Indian history, culture, religion and Vedas to the masses.
karnataka housing board schemes . all schemes
The Karnataka government, along with the central government’s Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (PMAY), offers various housing schemes to cater to the diverse needs of citizens across the state. This article provides a comprehensive overview of the major housing schemes available in the Karnataka housing board for both urban and rural areas in 2024.
Border towns and spaces of (in)visibility.pdf
This report explores the significance of border towns and spaces for strengthening responses to young people on the move. In particular it explores the linkages of young people to local service centres with the aim of further developing service, protection, and support strategies for migrant children in border areas across the region. The report is based on a small-scale fieldwork study in the border towns of Chipata and Katete in Zambia conducted in July 2023. Border towns and spaces provide a rich source of information about issues related to the informal or irregular movement of young people across borders, including smuggling and trafficking. They can help build a picture of the nature and scope of the type of movement young migrants undertake and also the forms of protection available to them. Border towns and spaces also provide a lens through which we can better understand the vulnerabilities of young people on the move and, critically, the strategies they use to navigate challenges and access support.
The findings in this report highlight some of the key factors shaping the experiences and vulnerabilities of young people on the move – particularly their proximity to border spaces and how this affects the risks that they face. The report describes strategies that young people on the move employ to remain below the radar of visibility to state and non-state actors due to fear of arrest, detention, and deportation while also trying to keep themselves safe and access support in border towns. These strategies of (in)visibility provide a way to protect themselves yet at the same time also heighten some of the risks young people face as their vulnerabilities are not always recognised by those who could offer support.
In this report we show that the realities and challenges of life and migration in this region and in Zambia need to be better understood for support to be strengthened and tuned to meet the specific needs of young people on the move. This includes understanding the role of state and non-state stakeholders, the impact of laws and policies and, critically, the experiences of the young people themselves. We provide recommendations for immediate action, recommendations for programming to support young people on the move in the two towns that would reduce risk for young people in this area, and recommendations for longer term policy advocacy.
2024: The FAR - Federal Acquisition Regulations, Part 41
Jennifer Schaus and Associates hosts a complimentary webinar series on The FAR in 2024. Join the webinars on Wednesdays and Fridays at noon, eastern.
Recordings are on YouTube and the company website.
https://www.youtube.com/@jenniferschaus/videos
Recently uploaded (20)
How To Cultivate Community Affinity Throughout The Generosity Journey
How To Cultivate Community Affinity Throughout The Generosity Journey
2024: The FAR - Federal Acquisition Regulations, Part 42
2024: The FAR - Federal Acquisition Regulations, Part 42
2024: The FAR - Federal Acquisition Regulations, Part 41
2024: The FAR - Federal Acquisition Regulations, Part 41
2017 09-12 roe's ustr submission exhibits index v2
- 1. PUBLIC DOCUMENT Before the Trade Policy Staff Committee Subcommittee on the Generalized System of Preferences Office of the United States Trade Representative 2017 Annual GSP Country Practices Review Brief of the Republic of Ecuador in Response to Chevron Corp.’s Petition to Withdraw or Suspend the Republic of Ecuador’s Designation as a Beneficiary Developing Country Under the Generalized System of Preferences Docket No. USTR-2013-0013 INDEX OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS September 12, 2017
- 2. 2 EXHIBIT NO. DESCRIPTION 92. Appellate Decision issued by the Appellate Court of the Hague, Civil Law Sector (Jul. 18, 2017) 93. Order by the U.S. Supreme Court declining to hear Steven Donziger’s petition for certiorari (Jun. 19, 2017) 94. Procedural Order No 45 (Aug. 29, 2016) 95. Hearing Transcript of Jurisdictional Hearing (November 23, 2010) 96. Procedural Order No. 16 (Mar. 19, 2013) 97. Procedural Order No 23 (Feb. 10, 2014) 98. Transcript of Procedural Meeting (Jan. 20, 2014) 99. Regulations for the Internal Regimen of the National Court, Resolution of Dec. 15, 2010, R.O.S 360 100. Ecuadorian Code of Civil Procedure, Codificación 11, Registro Oficial Suplemento 58 (Jul. 12, 2005)