Successful startup pitches must align Customer, Investor and Acquirer needs into a compelling story. Accompanying the story, waypoints & milestones must be detailed to demonstrate milestones and valuation points.
Knowledge acquisition group capabilities 2014 q1 (concise)AnnettaColeman
The Knowledge Acquisition Group specializes in competitive intelligence and benchmarking for pharmaceutical and healthcare clients. They use a proprietary methodology called Forensic Benchmarking to gather detailed insights into clients' competitors and identify best practices. Their team of senior consultants have extensive experience in areas like competitive analysis, market research, and strategic consulting. They aim to provide actionable recommendations to help clients gain competitive advantages.
This document summarizes strategies for competing internationally. It discusses reasons why companies enter foreign markets, including gaining new customers and resources. Competing globally makes strategy more complex due to differences in government policies, currencies, and customer tastes across countries. The document outlines strategic approaches for entering international markets such as exporting, licensing, franchising, foreign subsidiaries, and alliances. It also discusses how to build competitive advantage abroad through location, sharing resources, and coordination across borders.
Contact Centre Auditing, Baselining & BenchmarkingC3Africa
Economic realities are forcing call centres to
Critically evaluate all aspects of their operations…
How do you know that YOU are making the right decisions ?
Only knowledge and fact-based decisions will have positive, developmental impact on the operational effectiveness and efficiency of YOUR contact centre. Fact and knowledge-based decisions are YOUR sure, fast-track to success. V7
Knowledge Acquisition Group BioPharm Capabilities (Q3.2015)Annetta Coleman
The Knowledge Acquisition Group has unique expertise in benchmarking competitors and implementing best practices. They use a proprietary methodology called Forensic Benchmarking to conduct in-depth analyses of competitors' strategies, processes, and organizational structures. This identifies competitive differentiators and best practices that clients can adopt. The Knowledge Acquisition Group also provides implementation roadmaps and guidance to help clients successfully apply benchmarked strategies and realize competitive advantages. Their multi-disciplinary team combines market research, competitive intelligence, and operations research to generate predictive, actionable insights.
Competitive Analysis remains an underleveraged - yet - powerful tool in the product strategist's arsenal. Most companies know who their competitors are. Yet competitive analysis is rarely done in an in-depth manner and usually only covers feature checklists of similar products. This presentation will cover how to examine every aspect of your competition so that winning strategic plans can be put in place. This includes a four-step process for developing competitive analysis for both internal and external audiences and topics such as SWOT analysis, Porter's five forces, channel, team/company, product features, funding and others.
The document discusses the FTE-based model for outsourcing analytical testing that is gaining popularity among pharmaceutical companies. It provides benefits like reduced costs, flexibility, and expertise. Under this model, a contract laboratory provides full-time employees (FTEs) on a monthly basis tailored to a client's needs. This allows variable staffing levels and outsourcing of non-core activities. Savings of up to 25% are possible compared to traditional fee-for-service models due to lower administrative costs. Case studies demonstrate how the FTE model has been successfully implemented across different services and geographies.
Knowledge acquisition group capabilities 2014 q1 (concise)AnnettaColeman
The Knowledge Acquisition Group specializes in competitive intelligence and benchmarking for pharmaceutical and healthcare clients. They use a proprietary methodology called Forensic Benchmarking to gather detailed insights into clients' competitors and identify best practices. Their team of senior consultants have extensive experience in areas like competitive analysis, market research, and strategic consulting. They aim to provide actionable recommendations to help clients gain competitive advantages.
This document summarizes strategies for competing internationally. It discusses reasons why companies enter foreign markets, including gaining new customers and resources. Competing globally makes strategy more complex due to differences in government policies, currencies, and customer tastes across countries. The document outlines strategic approaches for entering international markets such as exporting, licensing, franchising, foreign subsidiaries, and alliances. It also discusses how to build competitive advantage abroad through location, sharing resources, and coordination across borders.
Contact Centre Auditing, Baselining & BenchmarkingC3Africa
Economic realities are forcing call centres to
Critically evaluate all aspects of their operations…
How do you know that YOU are making the right decisions ?
Only knowledge and fact-based decisions will have positive, developmental impact on the operational effectiveness and efficiency of YOUR contact centre. Fact and knowledge-based decisions are YOUR sure, fast-track to success. V7
Knowledge Acquisition Group BioPharm Capabilities (Q3.2015)Annetta Coleman
The Knowledge Acquisition Group has unique expertise in benchmarking competitors and implementing best practices. They use a proprietary methodology called Forensic Benchmarking to conduct in-depth analyses of competitors' strategies, processes, and organizational structures. This identifies competitive differentiators and best practices that clients can adopt. The Knowledge Acquisition Group also provides implementation roadmaps and guidance to help clients successfully apply benchmarked strategies and realize competitive advantages. Their multi-disciplinary team combines market research, competitive intelligence, and operations research to generate predictive, actionable insights.
Competitive Analysis remains an underleveraged - yet - powerful tool in the product strategist's arsenal. Most companies know who their competitors are. Yet competitive analysis is rarely done in an in-depth manner and usually only covers feature checklists of similar products. This presentation will cover how to examine every aspect of your competition so that winning strategic plans can be put in place. This includes a four-step process for developing competitive analysis for both internal and external audiences and topics such as SWOT analysis, Porter's five forces, channel, team/company, product features, funding and others.
The document discusses the FTE-based model for outsourcing analytical testing that is gaining popularity among pharmaceutical companies. It provides benefits like reduced costs, flexibility, and expertise. Under this model, a contract laboratory provides full-time employees (FTEs) on a monthly basis tailored to a client's needs. This allows variable staffing levels and outsourcing of non-core activities. Savings of up to 25% are possible compared to traditional fee-for-service models due to lower administrative costs. Case studies demonstrate how the FTE model has been successfully implemented across different services and geographies.
This document discusses five generic competitive strategies: low-cost provider, broad differentiation, focused low-cost, focused differentiation, and best-cost provider. It provides details on each strategy, including when each works best, potential advantages and risks, and how to effectively implement the strategies. Key aspects covered include pursuing cost advantages through the value chain, differentiating products, focusing on market niches, and providing quality attributes at a lower cost to appeal to value-conscious customers. Success requires leveraging unique resources and capabilities that are difficult for competitors to copy.
This document discusses strategies for strengthening a company's competitive position, including offensive and defensive actions, timing of moves, and scope of operations. It covers topics like building competitive advantages, targeting vulnerable rivals, horizontal mergers, vertical integration, and strategic alliances. The key points are that choosing the right competitive strategies, timing them effectively, and optimizing a firm's scope of operations are crucial for maximizing competitive position. Strategic options include both offensive moves to improve market position and defensive actions to protect advantages.
Aagami Market Intelligence PresentationAagami, Inc.
Aagami, Inc., is a life sciences consulting firm offering,
· Market Intelligence
· Strategic Consulting
· Technology Licensing
For Global companies in
· Pharma
· Biotech
· Consumer Healthcare
· Technology Licensing Office of Universities
· Medical Devices & Technology
· CROs, CDMOs
In Brief, Aagami Brings:
· Deep Experience of overcoming business and socio-cultural differences of various countries
· Supplementing your bandwidth to save time, effort & cost
· Global Deal experience, honed for decades
· Partners having combined experience of 250+ years
· Extensive ‘C’ level network nurtured for over 15 years
75+ Bio Pharma clients globally across 125+ assignments have put their trust in Aagami since 2003.
Positioning Strategies is a management consulting firm that helps technology companies develop positioning strategies. They have experience working with both startups and established firms. Their methodology involves analyzing the four forces of positioning: differentiation, vision, competition, and risk. They deliver positioning strategies, market visions, and messaging architectures to clients.
This document provides information about conducting contact centre assessments and audits. C3Africa is an integrated business that provides consulting, training, research, media and marketing services to the contact centre industry. It outlines C3Africa's methodology for conducting comprehensive contact centre assessments based on over 1,500 audit checkpoints across key competencies. Areas like strategy, processes, people, technology and more are evaluated. Contact centres are scored on a scale from foundational to world class in each area. The audit provides benchmarks, identifies risks and gaps, and makes recommendations to help contact centres improve performance and maturity. The document includes examples of reports and models used in C3Africa's contact centre assessment and improvement process.
This document discusses different business level strategies:
1. Price-based strategies (routes 1 and 2) focus on low costs and prices to attract price-sensitive customers. Margins are reduced.
2. Broad differentiation strategies (route 4) focus on identifying strategic customers and competitors and creating difficult-to-imitate differences.
3. Hybrid strategies (route 3) aim to achieve greater volumes at lower margins than competitors by having both differentiated activities and lower costs in other areas.
4. Focused differentiation strategies (route 5) target specific customer segments but risks from market changes eroding differences or tensions with other organizational strategies.
Sustaining advantages requires either unique low costs, capabilities, or barriers
This document provides an overview of business-level strategy. It defines business-level strategy as an integrated set of commitments and actions a firm uses to gain a competitive advantage in specific product markets. The chapter discusses the relationship between customers and business-level strategies in terms of who the firm serves, what needs it satisfies, and how it satisfies those needs. It explains the differences between cost leadership, differentiation, and focused cost leadership/differentiation strategies. The risks and benefits of each strategy are also described.
This document discusses commercialization of technologies developed at ICAR-IARI. It begins with an overview of ICAR's steps towards commercialization over the decades. A 3-tier IP management system is proposed to facilitate commercialization at the institute, zonal, and national levels. Different models for technology transfer are described, including licensing agreements. Key elements of licensing agreements and benefit sharing mechanisms are outlined. Promising technologies identified for commercialization include crop varieties, biopesticides, machinery, and more. Criteria to evaluate technologies for commercialization priority are also listed.
This document discusses evaluating a company's external environment through a PESTEL analysis and analyzing an industry's competitive forces using Porter's Five Forces model. It provides guidance on assessing factors like political/economic conditions, competitive rivalry, barriers to entry, supplier/buyer power, and substitutes. The document also covers evaluating industry drivers, competitors' positions, strategic profiles, key success factors, and the overall profit outlook. The goal is to understand external strategic factors and competitive dynamics affecting a company's performance.
This document discusses business-level strategy, defining it as an integrated set of actions a firm uses to gain a competitive advantage in a specific industry. It outlines the five main business-level strategies - cost leadership, differentiation, focused cost leadership, focused differentiation, and integrated cost leadership/differentiation - and discusses the competitive advantages, scope, value chain activities, risks, and relationship to Porter's Five Forces for each strategy. Choosing and implementing the right business-level strategy is important for a firm's success and depends on its internal resources and capabilities as well as external market conditions.
The Balanced Scorecard is a strategic assessment tool that evaluates a business from four perspectives: customer, internal business processes, innovation and learning, and financial. It aims to provide a more holistic view than only considering financial measures. Each perspective contains key metrics that allow businesses to track their progress, ensure customer satisfaction, improve internal processes, foster innovation, and ultimately achieve financial goals.
The Defense Logistics Agency is seeking an Inventory Management Specialist at the GS-07/09 level in Portsmouth, VA to manage inventory, analyze supply requirements, and ensure timely logistical support. Applicants must have at least 1 year of specialized experience at the GS-05 level for GS-07 or GS-07 level for GS-09, or an appropriate education level. Responsibilities include maintaining inventory records, developing supply plans, and resolving issues for commodity areas.
This document discusses different business-level strategies including cost leadership, differentiation, focus strategies, and integrated cost leadership/differentiation strategies. It provides details on how each strategy positions a firm to address the five forces of competition and explains the key activities involved in implementing each type of strategy. The document is from a PowerPoint presentation on strategic management concepts from a university textbook.
This document discusses operations strategy and its relationship to business strategy. It defines operations strategy as a plan for designing and managing operations functions to support the business strategy. Operations strategy focuses on specific capabilities, known as competitive priorities, that give a company a competitive edge such as low cost, quality, speed, or flexibility. The document provides examples of how companies can compete based on these different priorities and emphasizes that trade-offs are often required. It also discusses how to measure productivity and the challenges in measuring productivity in the service sector.
The document discusses strategic analysis and industry/competitive analysis. It provides an overview of the key components of strategic analysis including assessing the external environment, industry conditions, competitors, and a company's internal resources. It then discusses the 7 questions that should be answered when conducting industry and competitive analysis: 1) industry's economic traits, 2) competitive forces, 3) drivers of industry change, 4) competitive positions of rivals, 5) competitive moves of rivals, 6) key success factors, and 7) overall industry attractiveness.
October 2010 - CFO Roundtable - James Herman, Bob MooreAnnArborSPARK
This document discusses the benefits of hiring a CFO for a business. It notes that a CFO can help ensure a business has a realistic business plan, understands its market and competition, maximizes existing resources, controls costs and spending, and leverages technology properly. A CFO can also help a business access financing, increase profits and cash flow, clarify financial goals, and plan an exit strategy. The document provides two case studies that illustrate how a CFO helped transport company triple its revenue and increase profits to 20% and helped a biotech startup raise $20 million.
This document summarizes a presentation given by CARE Ratings on strategies for small and medium enterprises (SMEs) to expand globally and the benefits of credit ratings. The presentation discusses identifying opportunities in international markets, selecting appropriate entry strategies, and survival strategies for global competitiveness. It also outlines the role of banks in supporting SMEs and the various benefits of obtaining a credit rating from CARE Ratings, including improved access to funding. The document provides an overview of CARE Ratings' methodology for rating SMEs and assesses management, industry, operational, and financial risk factors.
The document discusses positioning life science companies for valuation and exit. It outlines the objectives and concerns of key constituencies like customers (payers/providers), investors, and acquirers. It emphasizes the importance of understanding standards and benchmarks in order to accurately value companies and plan milestones. Tools are presented to help uncover standards, including fact books on disease states and databases on acquisition triggers. An example valuation chart is shown to illustrate how standards define waypoints for fundraising and value increases over time based on developmental milestones. The overall objective is to provide tools that enable accurate valuation and a strong exit.
The document outlines the typical contents of a business plan, including an executive summary, analysis of the industry and company, market research, economics, management team, and financial plan. It provides detailed guidance on the information to include in each section, such as descriptions of customers, competitors, products, strategy, costs, risks, and financial projections. The goal is to present all relevant information to potential investors to obtain funding for the new business.
This document discusses five generic competitive strategies: low-cost provider, broad differentiation, focused low-cost, focused differentiation, and best-cost provider. It provides details on each strategy, including when each works best, potential advantages and risks, and how to effectively implement the strategies. Key aspects covered include pursuing cost advantages through the value chain, differentiating products, focusing on market niches, and providing quality attributes at a lower cost to appeal to value-conscious customers. Success requires leveraging unique resources and capabilities that are difficult for competitors to copy.
This document discusses strategies for strengthening a company's competitive position, including offensive and defensive actions, timing of moves, and scope of operations. It covers topics like building competitive advantages, targeting vulnerable rivals, horizontal mergers, vertical integration, and strategic alliances. The key points are that choosing the right competitive strategies, timing them effectively, and optimizing a firm's scope of operations are crucial for maximizing competitive position. Strategic options include both offensive moves to improve market position and defensive actions to protect advantages.
Aagami Market Intelligence PresentationAagami, Inc.
Aagami, Inc., is a life sciences consulting firm offering,
· Market Intelligence
· Strategic Consulting
· Technology Licensing
For Global companies in
· Pharma
· Biotech
· Consumer Healthcare
· Technology Licensing Office of Universities
· Medical Devices & Technology
· CROs, CDMOs
In Brief, Aagami Brings:
· Deep Experience of overcoming business and socio-cultural differences of various countries
· Supplementing your bandwidth to save time, effort & cost
· Global Deal experience, honed for decades
· Partners having combined experience of 250+ years
· Extensive ‘C’ level network nurtured for over 15 years
75+ Bio Pharma clients globally across 125+ assignments have put their trust in Aagami since 2003.
Positioning Strategies is a management consulting firm that helps technology companies develop positioning strategies. They have experience working with both startups and established firms. Their methodology involves analyzing the four forces of positioning: differentiation, vision, competition, and risk. They deliver positioning strategies, market visions, and messaging architectures to clients.
This document provides information about conducting contact centre assessments and audits. C3Africa is an integrated business that provides consulting, training, research, media and marketing services to the contact centre industry. It outlines C3Africa's methodology for conducting comprehensive contact centre assessments based on over 1,500 audit checkpoints across key competencies. Areas like strategy, processes, people, technology and more are evaluated. Contact centres are scored on a scale from foundational to world class in each area. The audit provides benchmarks, identifies risks and gaps, and makes recommendations to help contact centres improve performance and maturity. The document includes examples of reports and models used in C3Africa's contact centre assessment and improvement process.
This document discusses different business level strategies:
1. Price-based strategies (routes 1 and 2) focus on low costs and prices to attract price-sensitive customers. Margins are reduced.
2. Broad differentiation strategies (route 4) focus on identifying strategic customers and competitors and creating difficult-to-imitate differences.
3. Hybrid strategies (route 3) aim to achieve greater volumes at lower margins than competitors by having both differentiated activities and lower costs in other areas.
4. Focused differentiation strategies (route 5) target specific customer segments but risks from market changes eroding differences or tensions with other organizational strategies.
Sustaining advantages requires either unique low costs, capabilities, or barriers
This document provides an overview of business-level strategy. It defines business-level strategy as an integrated set of commitments and actions a firm uses to gain a competitive advantage in specific product markets. The chapter discusses the relationship between customers and business-level strategies in terms of who the firm serves, what needs it satisfies, and how it satisfies those needs. It explains the differences between cost leadership, differentiation, and focused cost leadership/differentiation strategies. The risks and benefits of each strategy are also described.
This document discusses commercialization of technologies developed at ICAR-IARI. It begins with an overview of ICAR's steps towards commercialization over the decades. A 3-tier IP management system is proposed to facilitate commercialization at the institute, zonal, and national levels. Different models for technology transfer are described, including licensing agreements. Key elements of licensing agreements and benefit sharing mechanisms are outlined. Promising technologies identified for commercialization include crop varieties, biopesticides, machinery, and more. Criteria to evaluate technologies for commercialization priority are also listed.
This document discusses evaluating a company's external environment through a PESTEL analysis and analyzing an industry's competitive forces using Porter's Five Forces model. It provides guidance on assessing factors like political/economic conditions, competitive rivalry, barriers to entry, supplier/buyer power, and substitutes. The document also covers evaluating industry drivers, competitors' positions, strategic profiles, key success factors, and the overall profit outlook. The goal is to understand external strategic factors and competitive dynamics affecting a company's performance.
This document discusses business-level strategy, defining it as an integrated set of actions a firm uses to gain a competitive advantage in a specific industry. It outlines the five main business-level strategies - cost leadership, differentiation, focused cost leadership, focused differentiation, and integrated cost leadership/differentiation - and discusses the competitive advantages, scope, value chain activities, risks, and relationship to Porter's Five Forces for each strategy. Choosing and implementing the right business-level strategy is important for a firm's success and depends on its internal resources and capabilities as well as external market conditions.
The Balanced Scorecard is a strategic assessment tool that evaluates a business from four perspectives: customer, internal business processes, innovation and learning, and financial. It aims to provide a more holistic view than only considering financial measures. Each perspective contains key metrics that allow businesses to track their progress, ensure customer satisfaction, improve internal processes, foster innovation, and ultimately achieve financial goals.
The Defense Logistics Agency is seeking an Inventory Management Specialist at the GS-07/09 level in Portsmouth, VA to manage inventory, analyze supply requirements, and ensure timely logistical support. Applicants must have at least 1 year of specialized experience at the GS-05 level for GS-07 or GS-07 level for GS-09, or an appropriate education level. Responsibilities include maintaining inventory records, developing supply plans, and resolving issues for commodity areas.
This document discusses different business-level strategies including cost leadership, differentiation, focus strategies, and integrated cost leadership/differentiation strategies. It provides details on how each strategy positions a firm to address the five forces of competition and explains the key activities involved in implementing each type of strategy. The document is from a PowerPoint presentation on strategic management concepts from a university textbook.
This document discusses operations strategy and its relationship to business strategy. It defines operations strategy as a plan for designing and managing operations functions to support the business strategy. Operations strategy focuses on specific capabilities, known as competitive priorities, that give a company a competitive edge such as low cost, quality, speed, or flexibility. The document provides examples of how companies can compete based on these different priorities and emphasizes that trade-offs are often required. It also discusses how to measure productivity and the challenges in measuring productivity in the service sector.
The document discusses strategic analysis and industry/competitive analysis. It provides an overview of the key components of strategic analysis including assessing the external environment, industry conditions, competitors, and a company's internal resources. It then discusses the 7 questions that should be answered when conducting industry and competitive analysis: 1) industry's economic traits, 2) competitive forces, 3) drivers of industry change, 4) competitive positions of rivals, 5) competitive moves of rivals, 6) key success factors, and 7) overall industry attractiveness.
October 2010 - CFO Roundtable - James Herman, Bob MooreAnnArborSPARK
This document discusses the benefits of hiring a CFO for a business. It notes that a CFO can help ensure a business has a realistic business plan, understands its market and competition, maximizes existing resources, controls costs and spending, and leverages technology properly. A CFO can also help a business access financing, increase profits and cash flow, clarify financial goals, and plan an exit strategy. The document provides two case studies that illustrate how a CFO helped transport company triple its revenue and increase profits to 20% and helped a biotech startup raise $20 million.
This document summarizes a presentation given by CARE Ratings on strategies for small and medium enterprises (SMEs) to expand globally and the benefits of credit ratings. The presentation discusses identifying opportunities in international markets, selecting appropriate entry strategies, and survival strategies for global competitiveness. It also outlines the role of banks in supporting SMEs and the various benefits of obtaining a credit rating from CARE Ratings, including improved access to funding. The document provides an overview of CARE Ratings' methodology for rating SMEs and assesses management, industry, operational, and financial risk factors.
The document discusses positioning life science companies for valuation and exit. It outlines the objectives and concerns of key constituencies like customers (payers/providers), investors, and acquirers. It emphasizes the importance of understanding standards and benchmarks in order to accurately value companies and plan milestones. Tools are presented to help uncover standards, including fact books on disease states and databases on acquisition triggers. An example valuation chart is shown to illustrate how standards define waypoints for fundraising and value increases over time based on developmental milestones. The overall objective is to provide tools that enable accurate valuation and a strong exit.
The document outlines the typical contents of a business plan, including an executive summary, analysis of the industry and company, market research, economics, management team, and financial plan. It provides detailed guidance on the information to include in each section, such as descriptions of customers, competitors, products, strategy, costs, risks, and financial projections. The goal is to present all relevant information to potential investors to obtain funding for the new business.
This chapter discusses supply management and the strategic sourcing process. It begins by explaining why supply management is critical, noting the financial and operational impacts of procurement activities. The chapter then outlines the six steps of the strategic sourcing process: assessing opportunities, profiling categories, developing a sourcing strategy, screening suppliers, supplier selection, and negotiating agreements. It also describes the procure-to-pay cycle and important trends in supply management like sustainable sourcing and managing supply chain disruptions.
This document provides an overview of key concepts in strategic management including definitions of strategic planning, management control, and operational control. It also discusses mission and vision statements, goal setting, gap analysis, strategic choice, and performance measurement. Multinational strategies and issues are briefly covered along with benchmarking, the product lifecycle, and sources of risk and uncertainty.
The document discusses the concepts of feasibility and viability studies for business ventures. It explains that feasibility studies examine the strengths and weaknesses of a business idea, considering opportunities, resources and likelihood of success. Viability refers to a business's ability to survive and grow. The key aspects of feasibility and viability studies include analyzing the market, technical requirements, financials, economics, and strategies for ensuring sustainability. Feasibility studies aim to determine if a project is possible while viability studies focus on whether a business concept can last into the future.
The document provides an overview of procurement processes, including:
1) Procurement involves acquiring goods, services, or works from external sources through a tendering process to ensure the best price while promoting fair competition and minimizing risks.
2) Key stages of procurement include understanding requirements, engaging the market, packaging works, allocating risks through contracting models, selecting a route to market, and communicating benefits.
3) Evaluation criteria and scoring needs to be clearly defined and agreed upon to fairly assess companies during the pre-qualification and tender stages.
The document discusses strategies for transforming an industry through value innovation. It outlines strategies such as expanding industry boundaries, focusing on creating new customer value rather than competing on price, and growing demand by attracting new customer segments. Key elements of the strategy include focusing on a few compelling factors valued by customers, having a unique value proposition, and communicating a clear message of the value offered.
The document discusses creativity and innovation, providing frameworks and processes to build capability and drive growth. It outlines an innovation model and roadmap, highlighting data sources, relationships, and how to use the DMAIC process for idea generation. Metrics and measures for innovation are also presented, including financial, project performance, process performance, and market launch indicators. The overall goal is to establish innovation as a core competency and strategic imperative.
The document discusses a situation analysis for Climate Control Technologies, including a SWOT analysis, competitive profiles, customer profiles, profitability analysis, and industry dynamics. It identifies opportunities for growth through new products, markets, customers, and partnerships. Key recommendations include focusing on high-growth customer segments and platforms, pursuing strategic acquisitions and partnerships, and differentiating through technology leadership and customer value.
This document discusses various barriers to entry that give incumbent firms competitive advantages over new entrants. It describes several types of incumbency advantages, including scale advantages from large production volumes, cumulative investment advantages from past innovations and advertising, and consumer loyalty advantages. It also discusses network effects and demand-side increasing returns, where the value of a good or service increases as more users adopt it, creating "winner-take-all" markets and strong barriers to entry for new competitors.
Technical Training and Coaching Material on How to develop a feasibility studies within transitional economies, and how to assess project feasibility and investment climate in the West Bank and Gaza Strip
This document outlines a process for product development that includes market assessment, pro forma financial analysis, concept development and demonstration, stage gate processes, enabling technologies, bootstrapping, technology roadmaps, product planning, partnering, IP management strategies, and implementation roadmaps. It emphasizes the importance of clear metrics, understanding customer needs, estimating costs and revenues, and integrating internal and external stakeholders through integrated product teams.
The document discusses new product development and product life cycle strategies. It describes the 8 major steps in new product development: 1) idea generation, 2) idea screening, 3) concept development, 4) marketing strategy, 5) business analysis, 6) product development, 7) test marketing, and 8) commercialization. It also outlines the typical stages in a product's life cycle: introduction, growth, maturity, and decline. Strategies are discussed for each stage of the product life cycle.
The document provides information on challenges facing entrepreneurs and a formula for success. It discusses common causes of business failure and actions entrepreneurs can take to succeed during different business phases from start-up to established. It also discusses the role of business models, providing examples of good and bad models. The document offers business model innovation services that IIG provides to entrepreneurs.
This document discusses strategies for new market entry and exploitation. It defines new entry as offering a new product, an established product to a new market, or creating a new organization. An entrepreneurial strategy generates and exploits new entry opportunities over time. Generating opportunities involves creating a valuable, rare, and inimitable bundle of resources using market and technological knowledge. Exploiting opportunities considers being a first mover and managing risks through narrow or broad market scope strategies or imitation strategies like franchising. Managing newness involves addressing liabilities of inexperience while leveraging advantages of flexibility.
The document outlines problems with low sales, brand awareness, and an unoptimized website. It proposes integrating systems, developing a brand strategy, and launching a new website. Solutions included market research, developing assets to support the value proposition, implementing marketing automation, and developing plans for customer segments. Performance was improved through an integrated approach.
Generation and Screening of Project Ideas Vivek Goyal
It is contain all about Generation of ideas, How to monitoring the environment, corporate appraisal, Profit potential of industries, Porter Models, Scouting of projects ideas, preliminary Screening, Project rating Index, sources of Positive Net present Value, On being an Entrepreneur
The document discusses entrepreneurial workshops and the process of innovation commercialization. It provides an overview of entrepreneurial workshops co-sponsored by Oklahoma State University that teach students about business plans and venture capital. It then outlines the typical stages of commercializing an innovation from initial investigation and product development through growth and maturity. It discusses common risks at each stage and recommends actions to mitigate those risks.
1. Positioning Life Science Companies
for Accurate Valuation & Strong Exit
Angel Capital Association Summit 2015
April 14 - 16, San Diego, CA
James F. Jordan
7. Find BENCHMARK
- Evaluate by comparison
To uncover the STANDARD
- A measure, norm or model in
comparative evaluation
Through use of TOOLS
- An implement to carry out a
particular function
To obtain KNOWLEDGE
- Acquired understanding through
facts, information or experience
1
3
2
4
Objective: Provide Tools for Accurate
Valuation & Strong Exit
7
8. Find BENCHMARK
- Evaluate by comparison
To uncover the STANDARD
- A measure, norm or model in
comparative evaluation
Through use of TOOLS
- An implement to carry out a
particular function
To obtain KNOWLEDGE
- Acquired understanding through
facts, information or experience
1
3
2
4
Objective: Provide Tools for Accurate
Valuation & Strong Exit
8
9. Find BENCHMARK
- Evaluate by comparison
To uncover the STANDARD
- A measure, norm or model in
comparative evaluation
Through use of TOOLS
- An implement to carry out a
particular function
To obtain KNOWLEDGE
- Acquired understanding through
facts, information or experience
1
3
2
4
Objective: Provide Tools for Accurate
Valuation & Strong Exit
9
10. Find BENCHMARK
- Evaluate by comparison
To uncover the STANDARD
- A measure, norm or model in
comparative evaluation
Through use of TOOLS
- An implement to carry out a
particular function
To obtain KNOWLEDGE
- Acquired understanding through
facts, information or experience
1
3
2
4
Objective: Provide Tools for Accurate
Valuation & Strong Exit
10
11. Find BENCHMARK
- Evaluate by comparison
To uncover the STANDARD
- A measure, norm or model in
comparative evaluation
Through use of TOOLS
- An implement to carry out a
particular function
To obtain KNOWLEDGE
- Acquired understanding through
facts, information or experience
1
3
2
4
Objective: Provide Tools for Accurate
Valuation & Strong Exit
11
12. Uncover the standards by addressing
constituency objectives & concerns
12
Objectives Ÿ Outcomes = éAccess + éQuality + êCost Ÿ IRR, ROI, Multiples Ÿ Price/Earning Ratio
Ÿ Placement amount Ÿ Revenue/margin accretion
Ÿ Market share
Concerns Ÿ Produce multi-year, accretive revenue stream Ÿ Portfolio balance & timing Ÿ Aligned business models
- Clinical trial participation Ÿ Validation of business model Ÿ Defend/expand existing categories
- New procedures (aka robotics) Ÿ Validation of product category Ÿ Enter new categories/markets
Ÿ Attain top-tier operating margins Ÿ Venture capital requirements Ÿ Formulary competitiveness
- Multi-year agreements (formulary) Ÿ Inability to participate in later rounds Ÿ Maintain/improve financial ratios
- Reimbursement category PPV Ÿ Implications of public financing Ÿ Salesforce leverage
- Predictable horizontal/longitudinal costs
- Sustainability of NewCo
Ÿ Capture regional market-share
- Technology guarantee
- Clinical trial access
Customer Investor Acquirer
13. Uncover the standards by addressing
constituency objectives & concerns
13
Objectives Ÿ Outcomes = éAccess + éQuality + êCost Ÿ IRR, ROI, Multiples Ÿ Price/Earning Ratio
Ÿ Placement amount Ÿ Revenue/margin accretion
Ÿ Market share
Concerns Ÿ Produce multi-year, accretive revenue stream Ÿ Portfolio balance & timing Ÿ Aligned business models
- Clinical trial participation Ÿ Validation of business model Ÿ Defend/expand existing categories
- New procedures (aka robotics) Ÿ Validation of product category Ÿ Enter new categories/markets
Ÿ Attain top-tier operating margins Ÿ Venture capital requirements Ÿ Formulary competitiveness
- Multi-year agreements (formulary) Ÿ Inability to participate in later rounds Ÿ Maintain/improve financial ratios
- Reimbursement category PPV Ÿ Implications of public financing Ÿ Salesforce leverage
- Predictable horizontal/longitudinal costs
- Sustainability of NewCo
Ÿ Capture regional market-share
- Technology guarantee
- Clinical trial access
Customer Investor Acquirer
14. Objectives Ÿ Outcomes = éAccess + éQuality + êCost Ÿ IRR, ROI, Multiples Ÿ Price/Earning Ratio
Ÿ Placement amount Ÿ Revenue/margin accretion
Ÿ Market share
Concerns Ÿ Produce multi-year, accretive revenue stream Ÿ Portfolio balance & timing Ÿ Aligned business models
- Clinical trial participation Ÿ Validation of business model Ÿ Defend/expand existing categories
- New procedures (aka robotics) Ÿ Validation of product category Ÿ Enter new categories/markets
Ÿ Attain top-tier operating margins Ÿ Venture capital requirements Ÿ Formulary competitiveness
- Multi-year agreements (formulary) Ÿ Inability to participate in later rounds Ÿ Maintain/improve financial ratios
- Reimbursement category PPV Ÿ Implications of public financing Ÿ Salesforce leverage
- Predictable horizontal/longitudinal costs
- Sustainability of NewCo
Ÿ Capture regional market-share
- Technology guarantee
- Clinical trial access
Customer Investor Acquirer
Uncover the standards by addressing
constituency objectives & concerns
14
15. Objectives Ÿ Outcomes = éAccess + éQuality + êCost Ÿ IRR, ROI, Multiples Ÿ Price/Earning Ratio
Ÿ Placement amount Ÿ Revenue/margin accretion
Ÿ Market share
Concerns Ÿ Produce multi-year, accretive revenue stream Ÿ Portfolio balance & timing Ÿ Aligned business models
- Clinical trial participation Ÿ Validation of business model Ÿ Defend/expand existing categories
- New procedures (aka robotics) Ÿ Validation of product category Ÿ Enter new categories/markets
Ÿ Attain top-tier operating margins Ÿ Venture capital requirements Ÿ Formulary competitiveness
- Multi-year agreements (formulary) Ÿ Inability to participate in later rounds Ÿ Maintain/improve financial ratios
- Reimbursement category PPV Ÿ Implications of public financing Ÿ Salesforce leverage
- Predictable horizontal/longitudinal costs
- Sustainability of NewCo
Ÿ Capture regional market-share
- Technology guarantee
- Clinical trial access
Customer Investor Acquirer
Uncover the standards by addressing
constituency objectives & concerns
15
21. The investor
Objectives Concerns
21
Ÿ IRR, ROI, Multiples
Ÿ Placement amount
Ÿ Portfolio balance & timing
Ÿ Validation of business model
Ÿ Validation of product category
Ÿ Venture capital requirements
Ÿ Inability to participate in later rounds
Ÿ Implications of public financing
22. The investor
Objectives Concerns
22
Ÿ IRR, ROI, Multiples
Ÿ Placement amount
Ÿ Portfolio balance & timing
Ÿ Validation of business model
Ÿ Validation of product category
Ÿ Venture capital requirements
Ÿ Inability to participate in later rounds
Ÿ Implications of public financing
23. The investor
Objectives Concerns
23
Ÿ IRR, ROI, Multiples
Ÿ Placement amount
Ÿ Portfolio balance & timing
Ÿ Validation of business model
Ÿ Validation of product category
Ÿ Venture capital requirements
Ÿ Inability to participate in later rounds
Ÿ Implications of public financing
24. The investor
Objectives Concerns
24
Ÿ IRR, ROI, Multiples
Ÿ Placement amount
Ÿ Portfolio balance & timing
Ÿ Validation of business model
Ÿ Validation of product category
Ÿ Venture capital requirements
Ÿ Inability to participate in later rounds
Ÿ Implications of public financing
25. The investor
Objectives Concerns
25
Ÿ IRR, ROI, Multiples
Ÿ Placement amount
Ÿ Portfolio balance & timing
Ÿ Validation of business model
Ÿ Validation of product category
Ÿ Venture capital requirements
Ÿ Inability to participate in later rounds
Ÿ Implications of public financing
26. The acquirer
Objectives Concerns
26
Ÿ Price/Earning Ratio
Ÿ Revenue/margin accretion
Ÿ Market share
Ÿ Aligned business models
Ÿ Defend/expand existing categories
Ÿ Enter new categories/markets
Ÿ Formulary competitiveness
Ÿ Maintain/improve financial ratios
Ÿ Salesforce leverage
27. The acquirer
Objectives Concerns
27
Ÿ Price/Earning Ratio
Ÿ Revenue/margin accretion
Ÿ Market share
Ÿ Aligned business models
Ÿ Defend/expand existing categories
Ÿ Enter new categories/markets
Ÿ Formulary competitiveness
Ÿ Maintain/improve financial ratios
Ÿ Salesforce leverage
28. The acquirer
Objectives Concerns
28
Ÿ Price/Earning Ratio
Ÿ Revenue/margin accretion
Ÿ Market share
Ÿ Aligned business models
Ÿ Defend/expand existing categories
Ÿ Enter new categories/markets
Ÿ Formulary competitiveness
Ÿ Maintain/improve financial ratios
Ÿ Salesforce leverage
29. The acquirer
Objectives Concerns
29
Ÿ Price/Earning Ratio
Ÿ Revenue/margin accretion
Ÿ Market share
Ÿ Aligned business models
Ÿ Defend/expand existing categories
Ÿ Enter new categories/markets
Ÿ Formulary competitiveness
Ÿ Maintain/improve financial ratios
Ÿ Salesforce leverage
30. The acquirer
Objectives Concerns
30
Ÿ Price/Earning Ratio
Ÿ Revenue/margin accretion
Ÿ Market share
Ÿ Aligned business models
Ÿ Defend/expand existing categories
Ÿ Enter new categories/markets
Ÿ Formulary competitiveness
Ÿ Maintain/improve financial ratios
Ÿ Salesforce leverage
31. The acquirer
Objectives Concerns
31
Ÿ Price/Earning Ratio
Ÿ Revenue/margin accretion
Ÿ Market share
Ÿ Aligned business models
Ÿ Defend/expand existing categories
Ÿ Enter new categories/markets
Ÿ Formulary competitiveness
Ÿ Maintain/improve financial ratios
Ÿ Salesforce leverage
32. Find BENCHMARK
- Evaluate by comparison
To uncover the STANDARD
- A measure, norm or model in
comparative evaluation
Through use of TOOLS
- An implement to carry out a
particular function
To obtain KNOWLEDGE
- Acquired understanding through
facts, information or experience
1
3
2
4
Objective: Provide Tools for Accurate
Valuation & Strong Exit
32
33. Find BENCHMARK
- Evaluate by comparison
To uncover the STANDARD
- A measure, norm or model in
comparative evaluation
Through use of TOOLS
- An implement to carry out a
particular function
To obtain KNOWLEDGE
- Acquired understanding through
facts, information or experience
1
3
2
4
Objective: Provide Tools for Accurate
Valuation & Strong Exit
33
34. Tools reveal standards so you
can plot a winning strategy
• Valuation Milestones: A review of standard, not
comparatives, avails and aligns valuation and fundable
milestones with those of investors and acquirers
• Disease State Fact Book: Distinguish the difference
between an incremental market improvement and a
monumental innovation
• Industry Life Cycle: Incumbent’s resist acquiring until
their existing investment is threatened or expiring
• Purchase Trigger Database: Reliance on an early exit is
misplaced if uninformed, know your acquirer’s habits
34
35. Tools reveal standards so you
can plot a winning strategy
• Valuation Milestones: A review of standard, not
comparatives, avails and aligns valuation and fundable
milestones with those of investors and acquirers
• Disease State Fact Book: Distinguish the difference
between an incremental market improvement and a
monumental innovation
• Industry Life Cycle: Incumbent’s resist acquiring until
their existing investment is threatened or expiring
• Purchase Trigger Database: Reliance on an early exit is
misplaced if uninformed, know your acquirer’s habits
35
36. • Each life sciences vertical differs
• Each product category may differ
• Each regulatory category may differ
Valuation standards define
your waypoints
Note:
• 2011 Venture Data Set for regional companies
• F = Fundable milestone – move to next class
• V = Value milestone – company value increases
36
- Pharmaceutical
- Medical Devices
- Diagnostics
- Healthcare IT
- Cardiovascular - Cancer
- 510k - PMA
Let’s look at an example
37. Data points from Venture
Source & Pitchbook
Note:
• 2011 Venture Data Set for regional companies
• F = Fundable milestone – move to next class
• V = Value milestone – company value increases
37
38. Valuation standards define
your waypoints
Note:
• 2011 Venture Data Set for regional companies
• F = Fundable milestone – move to next class
• V = Value milestone – company value increases
38
Pre-Money Capital Raise Post-Money Pre-Money Capital Raise Post-Money Pre-Money Capital Raise Post-Money
2.7 1.3 +/- 1 4 +/-2 8.0 4 +/- 1.9 12 +/- 4.3 15.9 8.9 +/- 3.5 24.8 +/- 7.6
Ÿ Creat proof of concept (F/V) Ÿ Attain regulatory pathway (V) Ÿ Commercial approval - OUS (V)
Ÿ Commercialization plan vaibility (F/V) Ÿ 1st in-human data/ start clinical trial (F/V) Ÿ Regulatory trial approval - US (F/V)
Ÿ Buildout technical team (V) Ÿ Design System Audit (V) Ÿ Launch US trial (V)
Ÿ Hire sales & marketing team (V)
Pre-Money Capital Raise Post-Money Pre-Money Capital Raise Post-Money Capital Raise Exit Value Months
32.1 11.6+/- 5.9 43.7 +/- 15 62.0 16. +/- 5.9 78.3 +/- 24 54 +/- 15 107 +/- 43 72 +/-21.6
Multiples CAGR %
2.2 +/- 0.7 14.8 +/- 7.6
Ÿ Regulatory approval - US (F/V) Ÿ Demonstrate hockey-stick revenue growth (F/V)
Ÿ Launch US product (V) Ÿ Pass cash-flow BE Point (F/V)
Ÿ US Revenue in excess of $xxM run-rate (F/V) Ÿ Regulatory trial path 2nd product - US (V)
Ÿ Demonstrate viability of 2nd product (V)
Series D - in millions Series E - in millions Exit Details
|------------------ 20 months +/- 8.7 -------------------|
Series A - in millions
|------------------- 11 months +/- 2.4 -------------------|
Series B - in millions Series C - in millions
|------------------- 14 months +/- 2.5 --------------------| |-------------------- 15 months +/- 3.4 -------------------|
39. Valuation standards define
your waypoints
Note:
• 2011 Venture Data Set for regional companies
• F = Fundable milestone – move to next class
• V = Value milestone – company value increases
39
Pre-Money Capital Raise Post-Money Pre-Money Capital Raise Post-Money Pre-Money Capital Raise Post-Money
2.7 1.3 +/- 1 4 +/-2 8.0 4 +/- 1.9 12 +/- 4.3 15.9 8.9 +/- 3.5 24.8 +/- 7.6
Ÿ Creat proof of concept (F/V) Ÿ Attain regulatory pathway (V) Ÿ Commercial approval - OUS (V)
Ÿ Commercialization plan vaibility (F/V) Ÿ 1st in-human data/ start clinical trial (F/V) Ÿ Regulatory trial approval - US (F/V)
Ÿ Buildout technical team (V) Ÿ Design System Audit (V) Ÿ Launch US trial (V)
Ÿ Hire sales & marketing team (V)
Pre-Money Capital Raise Post-Money Pre-Money Capital Raise Post-Money Capital Raise Exit Value Months
32.1 11.6+/- 5.9 43.7 +/- 15 62.0 16. +/- 5.9 78.3 +/- 24 54 +/- 15 107 +/- 43 72 +/-21.6
Multiples CAGR %
2.2 +/- 0.7 14.8 +/- 7.6
Ÿ Regulatory approval - US (F/V) Ÿ Demonstrate hockey-stick revenue growth (F/V)
Ÿ Launch US product (V) Ÿ Pass cash-flow BE Point (F/V)
Ÿ US Revenue in excess of $xxM run-rate (F/V) Ÿ Regulatory trial path 2nd product - US (V)
Ÿ Demonstrate viability of 2nd product (V)
Series D - in millions Series E - in millions Exit Details
|------------------ 20 months +/- 8.7 -------------------|
Series A - in millions
|------------------- 11 months +/- 2.4 -------------------|
Series B - in millions Series C - in millions
|------------------- 14 months +/- 2.5 --------------------| |-------------------- 15 months +/- 3.4 -------------------|
40. Valuation standards define
your waypoints
Note:
• 2011 Venture Data Set for regional companies
• F = Fundable milestone – move to next class
• V = Value milestone – company value increases
40
Pre-Money Capital Raise Post-Money Pre-Money Capital Raise Post-Money Pre-Money Capital Raise Post-Money
2.7 1.3 +/- 1 4 +/-2 8.0 4 +/- 1.9 12 +/- 4.3 15.9 8.9 +/- 3.5 24.8 +/- 7.6
Ÿ Creat proof of concept (F/V) Ÿ Attain regulatory pathway (V) Ÿ Commercial approval - OUS (V)
Ÿ Commercialization plan vaibility (F/V) Ÿ 1st in-human data/ start clinical trial (F/V) Ÿ Regulatory trial approval - US (F/V)
Ÿ Buildout technical team (V) Ÿ Design System Audit (V) Ÿ Launch US trial (V)
Ÿ Hire sales & marketing team (V)
Pre-Money Capital Raise Post-Money Pre-Money Capital Raise Post-Money Capital Raise Exit Value Months
32.1 11.6+/- 5.9 43.7 +/- 15 62.0 16. +/- 5.9 78.3 +/- 24 54 +/- 15 107 +/- 43 72 +/-21.6
Multiples CAGR %
2.2 +/- 0.7 14.8 +/- 7.6
Ÿ Regulatory approval - US (F/V) Ÿ Demonstrate hockey-stick revenue growth (F/V)
Ÿ Launch US product (V) Ÿ Pass cash-flow BE Point (F/V)
Ÿ US Revenue in excess of $xxM run-rate (F/V) Ÿ Regulatory trial path 2nd product - US (V)
Ÿ Demonstrate viability of 2nd product (V)
Series D - in millions Series E - in millions Exit Details
|------------------ 20 months +/- 8.7 -------------------|
Series A - in millions
|------------------- 11 months +/- 2.4 -------------------|
Series B - in millions Series C - in millions
|------------------- 14 months +/- 2.5 --------------------| |-------------------- 15 months +/- 3.4 -------------------|
41. Valuation standards define
your waypoints
Note:
• 2011 Venture Data Set for regional companies
• F = Fundable milestone – move to next class
• V = Value milestone – company value increases
41
Pre-Money Capital Raise Post-Money Pre-Money Capital Raise Post-Money Pre-Money Capital Raise Post-Money
2.7 1.3 +/- 1 4 +/-2 8.0 4 +/- 1.9 12 +/- 4.3 15.9 8.9 +/- 3.5 24.8 +/- 7.6
Ÿ Creat proof of concept (F/V) Ÿ Attain regulatory pathway (V) Ÿ Commercial approval - OUS (V)
Ÿ Commercialization plan vaibility (F/V) Ÿ 1st in-human data/ start clinical trial (F/V) Ÿ Regulatory trial approval - US (F/V)
Ÿ Buildout technical team (V) Ÿ Design System Audit (V) Ÿ Launch US trial (V)
Ÿ Hire sales & marketing team (V)
Pre-Money Capital Raise Post-Money Pre-Money Capital Raise Post-Money Capital Raise Exit Value Months
32.1 11.6+/- 5.9 43.7 +/- 15 62.0 16. +/- 5.9 78.3 +/- 24 54 +/- 15 107 +/- 43 72 +/-21.6
Multiples CAGR %
2.2 +/- 0.7 14.8 +/- 7.6
Ÿ Regulatory approval - US (F/V) Ÿ Demonstrate hockey-stick revenue growth (F/V)
Ÿ Launch US product (V) Ÿ Pass cash-flow BE Point (F/V)
Ÿ US Revenue in excess of $xxM run-rate (F/V) Ÿ Regulatory trial path 2nd product - US (V)
Ÿ Demonstrate viability of 2nd product (V)
Series D - in millions Series E - in millions Exit Details
|------------------ 20 months +/- 8.7 -------------------|
Series A - in millions
|------------------- 11 months +/- 2.4 -------------------|
Series B - in millions Series C - in millions
|------------------- 14 months +/- 2.5 --------------------| |-------------------- 15 months +/- 3.4 -------------------|
42. Valuation standards define
your waypoints
Note:
• 2011 Venture Data Set for regional companies
• F = Fundable milestone – move to next class
• V = Value milestone – company value increases
42
Pre-Money Capital Raise Post-Money
2.7 1.3 +/- 1 4 +/-2
Ÿ Creat proof of concept (F/V)
Ÿ Commercialization plan vaibility (F/V)
Ÿ Buildout technical team (V)
Series A - in millions
|------------------- 11 months +/- 2.4 -------------------|
Pre-Money Capital Raise Post-Money
8.0 4 +/- 1.9 12 +/- 4.3
Ÿ Attain regulatory pathway (V)
Ÿ 1st in-human data/ start clinical trial (F/V)
Ÿ Design System Audit (V)
Series B - in millions
|------------------- 14 months +/- 2.5 --------------------|
43.
44. Valuation standards define
your waypoints
Note:
• 2011 Venture Data Set for regional companies
• F = Fundable milestone – move to next class
• V = Value milestone – company value increases
44
Pre-Money Capital Raise Post-Money
2.7 1.3 +/- 1 4 +/-2
Ÿ Creat proof of concept (F/V)
Ÿ Commercialization plan vaibility (F/V)
Ÿ Buildout technical team (V)
Series A - in millions
|------------------- 11 months +/- 2.4 -------------------|
Pre-Money Capital Raise Post-Money
8.0 4 +/- 1.9 12 +/- 4.3
Ÿ Attain regulatory pathway (V)
Ÿ 1st in-human data/ start clinical trial (F/V)
Ÿ Design System Audit (V)
Series B - in millions
|------------------- 14 months +/- 2.5 --------------------|
45. Valuation standards define
your waypoints
Note:
• 2011 Venture Data Set for regional companies
• F = Fundable milestone – move to next class
• V = Value milestone – company value increases
45
Pre-Money Capital Raise Post-Money
2.7 1.3 +/- 1 4 +/-2
Ÿ Creat proof of concept (F/V)
Ÿ Commercialization plan vaibility (F/V)
Ÿ Buildout technical team (V)
Series A - in millions
|------------------- 11 months +/- 2.4 -------------------|
Pre-Money Capital Raise Post-Money
8.0 4 +/- 1.9 12 +/- 4.3
Ÿ Attain regulatory pathway (V)
Ÿ 1st in-human data/ start clinical trial (F/V)
Ÿ Design System Audit (V)
Series B - in millions
|------------------- 14 months +/- 2.5 --------------------|
A value milestone
increases company value
A fundable milestone
allows movement to next
investor class
46.
47. Pre-Money Capital Raise Post-Money
32.1 11.6+/- 5.9 43.7 +/- 15
Ÿ Regulatory approval - US (F/V)
Ÿ Launch US product (V)
Ÿ US Revenue in excess of $xxM run-rate (F/V)
Ÿ Demonstrate viability of 2nd product (V)
Series D - in millions
|------------------ 20 months +/- 8.7 -------------------|
Valuation standards define
your waypoints
Note:
• 2011 Venture Data Set for regional companies
• F = Fundable milestone – move to next class
• V = Value milestone – company value increases
47
Pre-Money Capital Raise Post-Money
15.9 8.9 +/- 3.5 24.8 +/- 7.6
Ÿ Commercial approval - OUS (V)
Ÿ Regulatory trial approval - US (F/V)
Ÿ Launch US trial (V)
Ÿ Hire sales & marketing team (V)
Series C - in millions
|-------------------- 15 months +/- 3.4 -------------------|
Pre-Money Capital Raise Post-Money
32.1 11.6+/- 5.9 43.7 +/- 15
Ÿ Regulatory approval - US (F/V)
Ÿ Launch US product (V)
Ÿ US Revenue in excess of $xxM run-rate (F/V)
Ÿ Demonstrate viability of 2nd product (V)
Series D - in millions
|------------------ 20 months +/- 8.7 -------------------|
48. Pre-Money Capital Raise Post-Money Capital Raise Exit Value Months
62.0 16. +/- 5.9 78.3 +/- 24 54 +/- 15 107 +/- 43 72 +/-21.6
Multiples CAGR %
2.2 +/- 0.7 14.8 +/- 7.6
Ÿ Demonstrate hockey-stick revenue growth (F/V)
Ÿ Pass cash-flow BE Point (F/V)
Ÿ Regulatory trial path 2nd product - US (V)
Series E - in millions Exit Details
Early exits are not
always practical
Note:
• 2011 Venture Data Set for regional companies
• F = Fundable milestone – move to next class
• V = Value milestone – company value increases
48
49. Pre-Money Capital Raise Post-Money Capital Raise Exit Value Months
62.0 16. +/- 5.9 78.3 +/- 24 54 +/- 15 107 +/- 43 72 +/-21.6
Multiples CAGR %
2.2 +/- 0.7 14.8 +/- 7.6
Ÿ Demonstrate hockey-stick revenue growth (F/V)
Ÿ Pass cash-flow BE Point (F/V)
Ÿ Regulatory trial path 2nd product - US (V)
Series E - in millions Exit Details
Valuation standards define
your waypoints
Note:
• 2011 Venture Data Set for regional companies
• F = Fundable milestone – move to next class
• V = Value milestone – company value increases
49
50. Pre-Money Capital Raise Post-Money Capital Raise Exit Value Months
62.0 16. +/- 5.9 78.3 +/- 24 54 +/- 15 107 +/- 43 72 +/-21.6
Multiples CAGR %
2.2 +/- 0.7 14.8 +/- 7.6
Ÿ Demonstrate hockey-stick revenue growth (F/V)
Ÿ Pass cash-flow BE Point (F/V)
Ÿ Regulatory trial path 2nd product - US (V)
Series E - in millions Exit Details
Valuation standards define
your waypoints
Note:
• 2011 Venture Data Set for regional companies
• F = Fundable milestone – move to next class
• V = Value milestone – company value increases
50
51. Pre-Money Capital Raise Post-Money Capital Raise Exit Value Months
62.0 16. +/- 5.9 78.3 +/- 24 54 +/- 15 107 +/- 43 72 +/-21.6
Multiples CAGR %
2.2 +/- 0.7 14.8 +/- 7.6
Ÿ Demonstrate hockey-stick revenue growth (F/V)
Ÿ Pass cash-flow BE Point (F/V)
Ÿ Regulatory trial path 2nd product - US (V)
Series E - in millions Exit Details
Valuation standards define
your waypoints
Note:
• 2011 Venture Data Set for regional companies
• F = Fundable milestone – move to next class
• V = Value milestone – company value increases
51
52. Pre-Money Capital Raise Post-Money Capital Raise Exit Value Months
62.0 16. +/- 5.9 78.3 +/- 24 54 +/- 15 107 +/- 43 72 +/-21.6
Multiples CAGR %
2.2 +/- 0.7 14.8 +/- 7.6
Ÿ Demonstrate hockey-stick revenue growth (F/V)
Ÿ Pass cash-flow BE Point (F/V)
Ÿ Regulatory trial path 2nd product - US (V)
Series E - in millions Exit Details
Valuation standards define
your waypoints
Note:
• 2011 Venture Data Set for regional companies
• F = Fundable milestone – move to next class
• V = Value milestone – company value increases
52
53. Pre-Money Capital Raise Post-Money Capital Raise Exit Value Months
62.0 16. +/- 5.9 78.3 +/- 24 54 +/- 15 107 +/- 43 72 +/-21.6
Multiples CAGR %
2.2 +/- 0.7 14.8 +/- 7.6
Ÿ Demonstrate hockey-stick revenue growth (F/V)
Ÿ Pass cash-flow BE Point (F/V)
Ÿ Regulatory trial path 2nd product - US (V)
Series E - in millions Exit Details
Valuation standards define
your waypoints
Note:
• 2011 Venture Data Set for regional companies
• F = Fundable milestone – move to next class
• V = Value milestone – company value increases
53
54. Tools reveal industry standards so you
can plot a winning strategy
• Valuation Milestones: A review of standard, not
comparatives, avails and aligns valuation and fundable
milestones with those of investors and acquirers
• Disease State Fact Book: Distinguish the difference
between an incremental market improvement and a
monumental innovation
• Industry Life Cycle: Incumbent’s resist acquiring until
their existing investment is threatened or expiring
• Purchase Trigger Database: Reliance on an early exit is
misplaced if uninformed, know your acquirer’s habits
54
55. Determine if a technology is an
innovation or a modification
DISEASE STATE FACT BOOK
Row # Base Year Year 2
1 Disease Prevalence Portion of the population found to have the condition (1 in 1000) 24,652,555 25,268,869
2 Incidence % Percentage of new cases (generally a year) 20%
3 Incidence
Occurrence of new cases since last time periodlater year or in a period
of time (generally a year)
5,053,774
4 Percentage Recurring Percentage of population with a reoccurring event in a given year 20%
5 Prevelance Population [Disease prevalence less incidence] x percentage recurring 4,043,019
6 Number Diagnosed Number diagnosed patients (the act of identifying trateable disease) 9,096,793
7 Diagnosis Rate %
Number diagnosed/disease prevalence (this included incident
patients)
36.0%
8 Procedural Approaches
Diagnostic, Medical Devices, Pharmaceutical, Long-term Care,
Rehabilitation, etc.
Medical
Therapy
CABG
Inteventional
Procedure
9 Procedure/Service Approach % The percent of diagnosed cases that would use this product/service 84.5% 3.5% 12.3%
10 Number of Procedures/Services Number of diagnosed x procedure/service approach % 7,687,700 318,388 1,119,815
11 Type of Products/Sub-services List the individual products or services performed Stent Guide Catheter Guide Wire
12 Units per Procedure/Service
Example: 2 Stents per Procedure, 30 pills per cycle, 30 days in long-
term care
2.2 1.75 1.1
13 Market Units/Services Number of Procedures x Units per Procedure/Service 2,463,593 1,959,677 1,231,797
14 Average Revenue per Event
Revenue value per event or service - note revenue by manufacturer
would be different than at the hospital level
550.00$ 9.87$ 6.93$
15 Market Dollars or Cost Maket Units x Average Price 1,354,976,390$ 19,342,008$ 8,536,351$
1,382,854,750
55
56. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Factors that increase market value
6
Disease Prevalence Portion of the population found to have the condition (1 in 1000)
Incidence % Percentage of new cases (generally a year)
Incidence
Occurrence of new cases since last time period — later year or in a period of time
(generally a year)
Percentage Recurring Percentage of population with a recurring event in a given year.
Prevalence Population [Disease prevalence less incidence] x percentage recurring
Number Diagnosed Number diagnosed patients (the act of identifying treatable disease)
Diagnosis Rate % Number diagnosed/disease prevalence (includes incident patients)
Procedural Approaches Diagnostic, Medical Devices, Pharmaceutical, Long-Term Care, Rehabilitation, etc.
Procedure/Service Approach % The percentage of diagnosed cases that would use this product/service
Number of Procedures/Services Number of diagnosed x procedure/service approach %
Type of products/Sub-services List the individual products or services performed
Units per Procedure/Service Example: 2 stents per procedure, 30 pills per cycle, 30 days in long-term care
Market Units/Services Number of Procedures x Units per Procedure/Service
Average Revenue per Event
Revenue value per event or service – note revenue by manufacturer would be
different than at the hospital level
Market Dollars or Cost Market Units x Average Price
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
57. DISEASE STATE FACT BOOK
Row # Base Year Year 2
1 Disease Prevalence Portion of the population found to have the condition (1 in 1000) 24,652,555 25,268,869
2 Incidence % Percentage of new cases (generally a year) 20%
3 Incidence
Occurrence of new cases since last time periodlater year or in a period
of time (generally a year)
5,053,774
4 Percentage Recurring Percentage of population with a reoccurring event in a given year 20%
5 Prevelance Population [Disease prevalence less incidence] x percentage recurring 4,043,019
6 Number Diagnosed Number diagnosed patients (the act of identifying trateable disease) 9,096,793
7 Diagnosis Rate %
Number diagnosed/disease prevalence (this included incident
patients)
36.0%
8 Procedural Approaches
Diagnostic, Medical Devices, Pharmaceutical, Long-term Care,
Rehabilitation, etc.
Medical
Therapy
CABG
Inteventional
Procedure
9 Procedure/Service Approach % The percent of diagnosed cases that would use this product/service 84.5% 3.5% 12.3%
10 Number of Procedures/Services Number of diagnosed x procedure/service approach % 7,687,700 318,388 1,119,815
11 Type of Products/Sub-services List the individual products or services performed Stent Guide Catheter Guide Wire
12 Units per Procedure/Service
Example: 2 Stents per Procedure, 30 pills per cycle, 30 days in long-
term care
2.2 1.75 1.1
13 Market Units/Services Number of Procedures x Units per Procedure/Service 2,463,593 1,959,677 1,231,797
14 Average Revenue per Event
Revenue value per event or service - note revenue by manufacturer
would be different than at the hospital level
550.00$ 9.87$ 6.93$
15 Market Dollars or Cost Maket Units x Average Price 1,354,976,390$ 19,342,008$ 8,536,351$
1,382,854,750
The factors that increase market value
57
58. DISEASE STATE FACT BOOK
Row #
1 Disease Prevalence
2 Incidence %
3 Incidence
4 Percentage Recurring
5 Prevelance Population
6 Number Diagnosed
7 Diagnosis Rate %
8 Procedural Approaches
9 Procedure/Service Approach %
10 Number of Procedures/Services
11 Type of Products/Sub-services
12 Units per Procedure/Service
13 Market Units/Services
14 Average Revenue per Event
15 Market Dollars or Cost
Year 2 Year 2
25,268,869 25,268,869
20% 20%
5,053,774 5,053,774
20% 25%
4,043,019 5,053,774
9,096,793 10,107,548
36.0% 40.0%
Medical
Therapy
CABG
Inteventional
Procedure
Medical
Therapy
CABG
Inteventional
Procedure
84.5% 3.5% 12.3% 84.5% 3.5% 12.3%
7,687,700 318,388 1,119,815 8,541,888 353,764 1,244,239
Stent Guide Catheter Guide Wire Stent Guide Catheter Guide Wire
2.2 1.75 1.1 2.2 1.75 1.1
2,463,593 1,959,677 1,231,797 2,737,326 2,177,418 1,368,663
550.00$ 9.87$ 6.93$ 550.00$ 9.87$ 6.93$
1,354,976,390$ 19,342,008$ 8,536,351$ 1,505,529,323$ 21,491,120$ 9,484,835$
1,536,505,2771,382,854,750
153,650,528
5%
4%
A 4% change in diagnosis rate can
increase the market by 11%
58
59. DISEASE STATE FACT BOOK
Row #
1 Disease Prevalence
2 Incidence %
3 Incidence
4 Percentage Recurring
5 Prevelance Population
6 Number Diagnosed
7 Diagnosis Rate %
8 Procedural Approaches
9 Procedure/Service Approach %
10 Number of Procedures/Services
11 Type of Products/Sub-services
12 Units per Procedure/Service
13 Market Units/Services
14 Average Revenue per Event
15 Market Dollars or Cost
Year 2 Year 2
25,268,869 25,268,869
20% 20%
5,053,774 5,053,774
20% 20%
4,043,019 4,043,019
9,096,793 9,096,793
36.0% 36.0%
Medical
Therapy
CABG
Inteventional
Procedure
Medical
Therapy
CABG
Inteventional
Procedure
84.5% 3.5% 12.3% 84.5% 2.0% 13.5%
7,687,700 318,388 1,119,815 7,687,700 181,936 1,227,157
Stent Guide Catheter Guide Wire Stent Guide Catheter Guide Wire
2.2 1.75 1.1 2.2 1.75 1.1
2,463,593 1,959,677 1,231,797 2,699,746 2,147,525 1,349,873
550.00$ 9.87$ 6.93$ 550.00$ 9.87$ 6.93$
1,354,976,390$ 19,342,008$ 8,536,351$ 1,484,860,398$ 21,196,075$ 9,354,621$
1,382,854,750 1,515,411,094
132,556,345
A 1.2% procedural shift can change
the market dollars by 10%
59
60. Market factors that attract acquirers
Factors that increase
market value: (all tides rise boats)
• Diagnosis rate
• Procedure rate
• Units p/ procedure
Factors that require taking
share: (fighting incumbents)
• Type of products
– Category transitions
• Market units
• Average selling price
• Market dollars
60
61. Tools reveal industry standards so you
can plot a winning strategy
• Valuation Milestones: A review of standard, not
comparatives, avails and aligns valuation and fundable
milestones with those of investors and acquirers
• Disease State Fact Book: Distinguish the difference
between an incremental market improvement and a
monumental innovation
• Industry Life Cycle: Incumbents resist acquiring until
their existing investment is threatened or expiring
• Purchase Trigger Database: Reliance on an early exit is
misplaced if uninformed, know your acquirer’s habits
61
67. Abbott
Atrium
B Braun
Baxter
Boston Scientific
CR Bard
Cook
Covidien
Drager
Gambro
GE Health care
Gore Medical
J&J
Kinetic concepts Inc.
Medtronic
Philips Health Care
Siemens Helath care
Smith and Nephew
Srtyker
St.Jude
Synergetics
Synovis
Unomedical/Convotech
Zimmer
MEDICAL DEVICE INDUSTRY MACRO MAP
HOSPITALS
ICU/CCU
cardiothoracicgeneral
colonrectal
otolaryngiology
orthopedic
plasticsurgery
ophthalmology
ob-gyn
generallaproscopy
general-other
Vascular
urology
endoscopy
neurology
Robotassisted/imageguided
anasthetics
respiratorydevices
hemostats
tissuesealants
adhesionprevention
monitoringsystems
Interventionalcardiology
Interventionalradiology
Electrophysiology
Interventionalneurology
CRM
Radiology(imaging)
Renal
Neurology
Infusionsystems
woundcareandmanagement
ü ü ü ü ü ü ü
ü ü ü ü
ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü
ü ü ü ü ü ü ü
ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü
ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü
ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü
ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü
ü ü ü
ü
ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü
ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü
ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü
ü ü ü
ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü
ü ü ü
ü ü ü ü ü ü
ü ü ü
ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü
ü ü ü ü ü ü ü
ü
ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü
ü ü ü ü ü
ü ü
MEDICAL DEVICE INDUSTRY MACRO MAP
Multi speciality Laboratory basedOperating Room Specialty
HOSPITALS
Macro Map
67
68. Micro Map
angiography IVUS vascular closure atherectomy thrombectomy cardiac catheter
angioplasty balloon
catheters
baremetal
drug
eluting
perpheral
stents
peripheral
stentgrafts
Abbott ü ü ü ü ü ü
Abiomed ü ü
Arrow Medical ü ü ü ü
Arterial Remodeling Technologies ü
Ashahi Intecc Co. ü ü ü
Atrium ü ü ü ü ü ü
B Braun ü ü
Biosensors International ü ü ü ü
Biotronik ü ü ü
Boston Scientific ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü
CR Bard ü ü ü ü ü
Cardiovascular Systems Inc. ü
Cardiac output technologies ü ü ü ü ü
Cardima ü
Clear stream technologies ü ü ü ü ü
Cook ü ü ü ü ü ü
Concentric Medical ü
Covidien ü ü ü
Edwards Life Sciences ü ü ü
Gore Medical ü ü
Great batch medical ü
Interventional Cardiology Micromap
stents
angioplasty
68
70. Tools reveal industry standards so you
can plot a winning strategy
• Valuation Milestones: A review of standard, not
comparatives, avails and aligns valuation and fundable
milestones with those of investors and acquirers
• Disease State Fact Book: Distinguish the difference
between an incremental market improvement and a
monumental innovation
• Industry Life Cycle: Incumbent’s resist acquiring until
their existing investment is threatened or expiring
• Purchase Trigger Database: Reliance on an early exit is
misplaced if uninformed, know your acquirer’s habits
70
71. 62% of PMA’s are acquired
after FDA approval
Pre-Money Capital Raise Post-Money Pre-Money Capital Raise Post-Money Pre-Money Capital Raise Post-Money
2.7 1.3 +/- 1 4 +/-2 8.0 4 +/- 1.9 12 +/- 4.3 15.9 8.9 +/- 3.5 24.8 +/- 7.6
Pre-Money Capital Raise Post-Money Pre-Money Capital Raise Post-Money Capital Raise Exit Value Months
32.1 11.6+/- 5.9 43.7 +/- 15 62.0 16. +/- 5.9 78.3 +/- 24 54 +/- 15 107 +/- 43 72 +/-21.6
Multiples CAGR %
2.2 +/- 0.7 14.8 +/- 7.6
Ÿ Regulatory approval - US (F/V)
Series D - in millions Series E - in millions Exit Details
|---------------- 20 months +/- 8.7 ---------------|
Series A - in millions Series B - in millions Series C - in millions
|---------------- 11 months +/- 2.4 ----------------| |--------------- 14 months +/- 2.5 ---------------| |--------------- 15 months +/- 3.4 --------------|
Pre-Money Capital Raise Post-Money Pre-Money Capital Raise Post-Money Pre-Money Capital Raise Post-Money
2.7 1.3 +/- 1 4 +/-2 8.0 4 +/- 1.9 12 +/- 4.3 15.9 8.9 +/- 3.5 24.8 +/- 7.6
Pre-Money Capital Raise Post-Money Pre-Money Capital Raise Post-Money Capital Raise Exit Value Months
32.1 11.6+/- 5.9 43.7 +/- 15 62.0 16. +/- 5.9 78.3 +/- 24 54 +/- 15 107 +/- 43 72 +/-21.6
Multiples CAGR %
2.2 +/- 0.7 14.8 +/- 7.6
Ÿ Regulatory approval - US (F/V)
Series D - in millions Series E - in millions Exit Details
|---------------- 20 months +/- 8.7 ---------------|
Series A - in millions Series B - in millions Series C - in millions
|---------------- 11 months +/- 2.4 ----------------| |--------------- 14 months +/- 2.5 ---------------| |--------------- 15 months +/- 3.4 --------------|
Note:
• 2011 Venture Data Set
• Sample size = 18
• Most likely less today before PMA
7 (38%) acquired before regulatory approval
11 (62%) acquired after regulatory approval
71
72. 62% of PMA’s are acquired
after FDA approval
Pre-Money Capital Raise Post-Money Pre-Money Capital Raise Post-Money Pre-Money Capital Raise Post-Money
2.7 1.3 +/- 1 4 +/-2 8.0 4 +/- 1.9 12 +/- 4.3 15.9 8.9 +/- 3.5 24.8 +/- 7.6
Pre-Money Capital Raise Post-Money Pre-Money Capital Raise Post-Money Capital Raise Exit Value Months
32.1 11.6+/- 5.9 43.7 +/- 15 62.0 16. +/- 5.9 78.3 +/- 24 54 +/- 15 107 +/- 43 72 +/-21.6
Multiples CAGR %
2.2 +/- 0.7 14.8 +/- 7.6
Ÿ Regulatory approval - US (F/V)
Series D - in millions Series E - in millions Exit Details
|---------------- 20 months +/- 8.7 ---------------|
Series A - in millions Series B - in millions Series C - in millions
|---------------- 11 months +/- 2.4 ----------------| |--------------- 14 months +/- 2.5 ---------------| |--------------- 15 months +/- 3.4 --------------|
Pre-Money Capital Raise Post-Money Pre-Money Capital Raise Post-Money Pre-Money Capital Raise Post-Money
2.7 1.3 +/- 1 4 +/-2 8.0 4 +/- 1.9 12 +/- 4.3 15.9 8.9 +/- 3.5 24.8 +/- 7.6
Pre-Money Capital Raise Post-Money Pre-Money Capital Raise Post-Money Capital Raise Exit Value Months
32.1 11.6+/- 5.9 43.7 +/- 15 62.0 16. +/- 5.9 78.3 +/- 24 54 +/- 15 107 +/- 43 72 +/-21.6
Multiples CAGR %
2.2 +/- 0.7 14.8 +/- 7.6
Ÿ Regulatory approval - US (F/V)
Series D - in millions Series E - in millions Exit Details
|---------------- 20 months +/- 8.7 ---------------|
Series A - in millions Series B - in millions Series C - in millions
|---------------- 11 months +/- 2.4 ----------------| |--------------- 14 months +/- 2.5 ---------------| |--------------- 15 months +/- 3.4 --------------|
Note:
• 2011 Venture Data Set
• Sample size = 18
• Most likely less today before PMA
7 (38%) acquired before regulatory approval
11 (62%) acquired after regulatory approval
72
73. A value proposition must address
constituency objectives & concerns
• Identify constituency measures of success
• Valuation standards define your waypoints
• Distinguish innovation from improvement
• Determine an industry’s readiness to change
• M&A history defines triggers (timing)
73
74. A copy of this presentation maybe found at
www.plsg.com or www.jfjordan.com
Angel Capital Association Summit 2015
April 14 - 16, San Diego, CA
James F. Jordan