Latest developments at
                         EU level concerning
                         social security
                         coordination

trESS seminar Rome
30 May 2012

Rob Cornelissen
Magdalena Ciesielska
LATEST DEVELOMENTS IN EU
 LEGISLATION

• 2010 Commission proposal to modify Reg
883/2004 and 987/2009

• First importance of proposal: legal basis for
changing the rules. First time that coordination
rules are changed after entry into force of Lisbon
Treaty on 1 December 2009
Situation before Lisbon Treaty

• Two legal bases:
  • Art 42 EC for employed persons and their dependents
    (family members and survivors): co-decision Council
    and Parliament. Unanimity in Council required
  • Art 308 EC for all other persons covered by Reg (self-
    employed, students, non-active people). Council
    legislator. Unanimity in Council required
Situation under Lisbon Treaty

• Art 48 TFEU: legal basis for employed and self-
employed persons and their dependents. Co-
decision Council and Parliament. Qualified
majority in Council (with a brake system)
• Art 21 (3) TFEU: competence for all EU citizens
not covered by Art 48 TFEU. Council is legislator.
Unanimity in Council required.
2010 Commission proposal based on
 Art 48 TFEU only
• Court: dual legal basis is excluded if one Treaty
provision requires ordinary legislative procedure,
whereas the other requires Council to act
unanimously. In that case: determine appropriate
legal basis in light of general scope of Treaty
• Commission: Art 48 TFEU is adequate and
sufficient legal basis
Why is Art 48 TFEU adequate and
 sufficient legal basis?
• Overwhelming majority of EU citizens covered by
Art 48 TFEU:
  • Wide meaning of "employed" and "self-employed"
  • Art 48 TFEU covers also retired "employed" and "self-
    employed"
  • Art 48 TFEU covers also family members and
    survivors of "employed" and "self-employed"
• Khalil judgment: inclusion of refugees (a "very
restricted category of persons") in scope of Reg
based on Art 51 EC valid
Council and Parliament agree with
 Commission
• Commission proposal, based on Art 48 TFEU,
adopted on 23 May 2012 (entry into force: 20 days
after publication)
• Art 48 TFEU is adequate and sufficient legal basis
for future EU social security coordination legislation
Changes on content in BR
 (=Basic Regulation: Reg 883)

1. Posted workers
• Minor change in Art 12 BR
• One of conditions for posting under current Art
12 BR: "that he/she is not sent to replace another
person"
• New version of Art 12: "that he/she is not sent to
replace another posted person"
• New wording reflects better purpose of provision:
to prevent successive posting of employees
2. Aircrew members

• Current rules of Title II BR: no specific provisions
for specific categories of people
• New Art 11 (5) BR: "An activity as an aircrew
member performing air passenger or freight
services shall be deemed as an activity pursued in
the Member State where the home base as
defined in Annex III to Council Regulation (EEC) No
3922/91 is located"
Aircrew members

• Notion of "home base" for flying personnel is well
defined in existing EU law. Each aircraft has duty to
nominate a home base for each aircrew member
• Home base: place from which aircrew member
habitually carries out work in performance of
his/her contract
Aircrew members

• "Home base" is closely linked to actual place of
work of person concerned and the lex loci laboris
principle
• Constitutes a more suitable element for
determination of applicable legislation than
"registered office" or "place of business" of
employer
3. Change of rules for working in two
  or more MS
• Current Art 13 BR: if person normally works in
two or more MS for one employer, person is subject
to legislation of residence only if he/she pursues
"substantial part of activities" there.
• Current Art 13 BR: if person normally works in
two or more MS for two or more employers situated
in different MS, person is subject to MS of
residence, even when no "substantial part of
activities" there
Change of rules for working in two or
 more MS
• Art 13 BR as amended: person normally working
in two or more MS is subject to legislation of MS of
residence only if he/she pursues "substantial part of
activities" there, regardless if person has one or
various employers
Change of rules for working in two or
 more MS
• If no substantial activities in MS of residence:
   • MS in which registered office is situated if person is
     employed by one employer or by two or more employers
     who have registered office in a single MS only; or
   • MS in which registered office is situated outside MS
     of residence if he/she is employed by two or more
     employers which have registered office in two MS, one
     of them is MS of residence; or
   • MS of residence if he/she is employed by two or more
     employers and at least two of them have registered
     office in different MS other than MS of residence
Change of rules for working in two or
 more MS: marginal activities
• Current Art 14 (5) IR: a person pursuing
"activities of marginal extent" in one MS and also
working for same employer in another MS is NOT
covered by Art 13 BR. (Idea: prevent abuse). Such
person is, for purpose of determining applicable
legislation, treated as working in one MS
• Art 14(5) and 14(5a) IR amended: same principle
applies for person pursuing main activity in one MS
for one employer and another "activity of marginal
extent" in another MS for another employer
Marginal activities

• No definition in Regulations of notion "marginal
activities"
• Pratical Guide on applicable legislation: activities
that are permanent but insignificant in terms of
time and economic return. As an indicator,activities
less than 5% of worker's regular working time
and/or less than 5% of overall remuneration are
marginal activities. Also nature of activities can be
indicator.
• Not always easy to implement
Working in two or more MS.
 Clarification of notion"registered
 office" or "place of business"

• New Art 14 (5a) IR (= Implementing
Regulation= Regulation 987/2009): for purpose of
application of Title II BR the notion "registered
office or place of business" refers to place where
the essential decisions of the undertaking are
adopted and where the functions of its central
administration are carried out
4. Unemployment benefits for cross
  border self-employed
• New Art 65a BR: solution for formerly self-
employed frontier workers who were covered in MS
of last activity, but whose MS of residence does not
have any unemployment benefit scheme for self-
employed
5. Transitional provision concerning
  applicable legislation
• If, as a result of the new Regulation, a person is
subject to the legislation of a MS other than the one
determined in accordance with the old rules, the old
rules continue to apply (for a maximum of 10
years) as long as relevant situation remains
unchanged, unless person concerned requests the
immediate application of the new rules
EEA and Switzerland

• EEA Joint Committee Decision No 76/2011
  • adopted on 1 July 2011 (OJ L 262, 6.10.2011, p.
    33)
  • not yet entered into force (pending approval by IS
    parliament) – possibly on 1 June 2012
  • Regulations (EEC) Nos 1408/71 and 574/72 still
    apply in relation to IS, LI and NO
• EC-CH Joint Committee Decision No 1/2012
  • OJ L 103, 13.4.2012, p. 51
  • Regulations (EC) Nos 883/2004 and 987/2009
    apply in relation to Switzerland since 1 April 2012
CASE-LAW

• Opinion of the AG of 3 May 2012 in case
 C- 115/11 Format
 (pending before the     Court)

The concept of a "person normally employed in the
territory of two and more Member States"
ADMINISTRATIVE COMMISSION

 1. Practical Guide on applicable legislation
 • Replaces the "Posting Guide" (chapter on applicable
   legislation when working in two or more Member States)
 • Working instrument to assist institutions, employers and
   citizens in the area of determining the applicable social
   security legislation
 • An update is scheduled for the 2nd half of 2012
 • Available on the Commission's website:
   http://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=851&l
   angId=it
ADMINISTRATIVE COMMISSION
2. Current discussions:

•    Interpretation of the term "posted person sent to
    replace another posted person" (Art 12(1) BR)

    Practical examples:
    • slaughter house
    • Alpes resorts

•   Applicable legislation in case of parental leave
EXTERNAL DIMENSION

 Communication on the External Dimension of EU
 Social Security Coordination (COM(2012)
 • sets out ways in which the EU rules currently impact on
   social security coordination with third countries
 • describes existing components of common EU approach
   to social security coordination with third countries
 • calls for strengthening cooperation between Member
   States to achieve a more coherent approach to social
   security coordination with third countries
REVISION OF COORDINATION
 REGULATIONS
 • Scope:
    - coordination of long-term care benefits (LTC)
    - coordination of unemployment benefits

 • Planning
    - 2009-2011 Evaluation
    - 2012-2013 Impact assessment
    - 2014 Proposal from the Commission
Thank you very much for your attention!




                    Questions??

2012 - Latest developments at EU level concerning social security coordination

  • 1.
    Latest developments at EU level concerning social security coordination trESS seminar Rome 30 May 2012 Rob Cornelissen Magdalena Ciesielska
  • 2.
    LATEST DEVELOMENTS INEU LEGISLATION • 2010 Commission proposal to modify Reg 883/2004 and 987/2009 • First importance of proposal: legal basis for changing the rules. First time that coordination rules are changed after entry into force of Lisbon Treaty on 1 December 2009
  • 3.
    Situation before LisbonTreaty • Two legal bases: • Art 42 EC for employed persons and their dependents (family members and survivors): co-decision Council and Parliament. Unanimity in Council required • Art 308 EC for all other persons covered by Reg (self- employed, students, non-active people). Council legislator. Unanimity in Council required
  • 4.
    Situation under LisbonTreaty • Art 48 TFEU: legal basis for employed and self- employed persons and their dependents. Co- decision Council and Parliament. Qualified majority in Council (with a brake system) • Art 21 (3) TFEU: competence for all EU citizens not covered by Art 48 TFEU. Council is legislator. Unanimity in Council required.
  • 5.
    2010 Commission proposalbased on Art 48 TFEU only • Court: dual legal basis is excluded if one Treaty provision requires ordinary legislative procedure, whereas the other requires Council to act unanimously. In that case: determine appropriate legal basis in light of general scope of Treaty • Commission: Art 48 TFEU is adequate and sufficient legal basis
  • 6.
    Why is Art48 TFEU adequate and sufficient legal basis? • Overwhelming majority of EU citizens covered by Art 48 TFEU: • Wide meaning of "employed" and "self-employed" • Art 48 TFEU covers also retired "employed" and "self- employed" • Art 48 TFEU covers also family members and survivors of "employed" and "self-employed" • Khalil judgment: inclusion of refugees (a "very restricted category of persons") in scope of Reg based on Art 51 EC valid
  • 7.
    Council and Parliamentagree with Commission • Commission proposal, based on Art 48 TFEU, adopted on 23 May 2012 (entry into force: 20 days after publication) • Art 48 TFEU is adequate and sufficient legal basis for future EU social security coordination legislation
  • 8.
    Changes on contentin BR (=Basic Regulation: Reg 883) 1. Posted workers • Minor change in Art 12 BR • One of conditions for posting under current Art 12 BR: "that he/she is not sent to replace another person" • New version of Art 12: "that he/she is not sent to replace another posted person" • New wording reflects better purpose of provision: to prevent successive posting of employees
  • 9.
    2. Aircrew members •Current rules of Title II BR: no specific provisions for specific categories of people • New Art 11 (5) BR: "An activity as an aircrew member performing air passenger or freight services shall be deemed as an activity pursued in the Member State where the home base as defined in Annex III to Council Regulation (EEC) No 3922/91 is located"
  • 10.
    Aircrew members • Notionof "home base" for flying personnel is well defined in existing EU law. Each aircraft has duty to nominate a home base for each aircrew member • Home base: place from which aircrew member habitually carries out work in performance of his/her contract
  • 11.
    Aircrew members • "Homebase" is closely linked to actual place of work of person concerned and the lex loci laboris principle • Constitutes a more suitable element for determination of applicable legislation than "registered office" or "place of business" of employer
  • 12.
    3. Change ofrules for working in two or more MS • Current Art 13 BR: if person normally works in two or more MS for one employer, person is subject to legislation of residence only if he/she pursues "substantial part of activities" there. • Current Art 13 BR: if person normally works in two or more MS for two or more employers situated in different MS, person is subject to MS of residence, even when no "substantial part of activities" there
  • 13.
    Change of rulesfor working in two or more MS • Art 13 BR as amended: person normally working in two or more MS is subject to legislation of MS of residence only if he/she pursues "substantial part of activities" there, regardless if person has one or various employers
  • 14.
    Change of rulesfor working in two or more MS • If no substantial activities in MS of residence: • MS in which registered office is situated if person is employed by one employer or by two or more employers who have registered office in a single MS only; or • MS in which registered office is situated outside MS of residence if he/she is employed by two or more employers which have registered office in two MS, one of them is MS of residence; or • MS of residence if he/she is employed by two or more employers and at least two of them have registered office in different MS other than MS of residence
  • 15.
    Change of rulesfor working in two or more MS: marginal activities • Current Art 14 (5) IR: a person pursuing "activities of marginal extent" in one MS and also working for same employer in another MS is NOT covered by Art 13 BR. (Idea: prevent abuse). Such person is, for purpose of determining applicable legislation, treated as working in one MS • Art 14(5) and 14(5a) IR amended: same principle applies for person pursuing main activity in one MS for one employer and another "activity of marginal extent" in another MS for another employer
  • 16.
    Marginal activities • Nodefinition in Regulations of notion "marginal activities" • Pratical Guide on applicable legislation: activities that are permanent but insignificant in terms of time and economic return. As an indicator,activities less than 5% of worker's regular working time and/or less than 5% of overall remuneration are marginal activities. Also nature of activities can be indicator. • Not always easy to implement
  • 17.
    Working in twoor more MS. Clarification of notion"registered office" or "place of business" • New Art 14 (5a) IR (= Implementing Regulation= Regulation 987/2009): for purpose of application of Title II BR the notion "registered office or place of business" refers to place where the essential decisions of the undertaking are adopted and where the functions of its central administration are carried out
  • 18.
    4. Unemployment benefitsfor cross border self-employed • New Art 65a BR: solution for formerly self- employed frontier workers who were covered in MS of last activity, but whose MS of residence does not have any unemployment benefit scheme for self- employed
  • 19.
    5. Transitional provisionconcerning applicable legislation • If, as a result of the new Regulation, a person is subject to the legislation of a MS other than the one determined in accordance with the old rules, the old rules continue to apply (for a maximum of 10 years) as long as relevant situation remains unchanged, unless person concerned requests the immediate application of the new rules
  • 20.
    EEA and Switzerland •EEA Joint Committee Decision No 76/2011 • adopted on 1 July 2011 (OJ L 262, 6.10.2011, p. 33) • not yet entered into force (pending approval by IS parliament) – possibly on 1 June 2012 • Regulations (EEC) Nos 1408/71 and 574/72 still apply in relation to IS, LI and NO • EC-CH Joint Committee Decision No 1/2012 • OJ L 103, 13.4.2012, p. 51 • Regulations (EC) Nos 883/2004 and 987/2009 apply in relation to Switzerland since 1 April 2012
  • 21.
    CASE-LAW • Opinion ofthe AG of 3 May 2012 in case C- 115/11 Format (pending before the Court) The concept of a "person normally employed in the territory of two and more Member States"
  • 22.
    ADMINISTRATIVE COMMISSION 1.Practical Guide on applicable legislation • Replaces the "Posting Guide" (chapter on applicable legislation when working in two or more Member States) • Working instrument to assist institutions, employers and citizens in the area of determining the applicable social security legislation • An update is scheduled for the 2nd half of 2012 • Available on the Commission's website: http://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=851&l angId=it
  • 23.
    ADMINISTRATIVE COMMISSION 2. Currentdiscussions: • Interpretation of the term "posted person sent to replace another posted person" (Art 12(1) BR) Practical examples: • slaughter house • Alpes resorts • Applicable legislation in case of parental leave
  • 24.
    EXTERNAL DIMENSION Communicationon the External Dimension of EU Social Security Coordination (COM(2012) • sets out ways in which the EU rules currently impact on social security coordination with third countries • describes existing components of common EU approach to social security coordination with third countries • calls for strengthening cooperation between Member States to achieve a more coherent approach to social security coordination with third countries
  • 25.
    REVISION OF COORDINATION REGULATIONS • Scope: - coordination of long-term care benefits (LTC) - coordination of unemployment benefits • Planning - 2009-2011 Evaluation - 2012-2013 Impact assessment - 2014 Proposal from the Commission
  • 26.
    Thank you verymuch for your attention! Questions??