Marcella Maher Keogh outlines community efforts by Duet and the Tipperary Energy Agency focusing on energy conservation and efficiency, revealing a significant potential for cost savings. Initiatives from 2012 to 2014 led to the upgrade of numerous homes and community buildings, securing substantial grants to promote energy efficiency. The document highlights challenges such as funding and contractor compliance, while also showcasing the positive impact on local economies, community involvement, and sustainability.

1. By Marcella Maher Keogh

2. Marcella Maher Keogh
PM for DUET & ECT
 Architectural Technician
 Building Energy Assessor
 Project Manager
 Internship with DUET in 2012
 DUET are a group of Volunteers looking to generate
activity in their community
 Role facilitated by NTLP

3. DUET
 A meeting with
Tipperary Energy
Agency to discuss
options.
It was decided that conservation rather than
generation would provide better outcomes to
the community.
A survey of homes in the community was
required to establish Insulation levels, types of
fuels being used by house holders, cost of
Energy per household in the community.

4. Survey Report
Oct 2011
Community
-Core
Economy
Econom
y
Culture
and
Tourism

5. Survey Results
 €1,000,000 per year spent on energy
◦ €1000 per person
◦ €2,500 per household
 A 25% reduction in energy usage could save the parish
€250,000
 60% (200 out of 349) cited financial savings as their
most important reason for investing in energy
efficiency

6. BETTER ENERGY COMMUNITIES
 SEAI launched a Grant under the Better Energy
Communities Pilot scheme -2012
 Drombane Upperchurch Energy Team were successful

7. Energy Team Achievements in
2012 & 2013
 A total of 50 houses upgraded and 2 community
buildings
 Total cost of project €400,000
 Grant from SEAI €300,000

8. Energy Communities Tipperary -2014
 Other Communities to replicate Drombane Project
 Kilcommon / Rearcross
 Lorrha / Rathcabbin
 Birdhill

9. Energy Team Achievements in 2014
 A total of 110 houses and 2 community buildings
 Total cost of project €1,078,000
 Grant from SEAI €840,000
 Approx 1.5 GWh/ year saved

10. Challenges
 Project Timeline – Often tight
 Admin seemed heavy and time consuming
 Contractors letting go good tradesmen – work starts in
June / July till November
 Possibility of rolling grants – 2/3 year program – with
yearly targets – or overlap on projects

11. Challenges
 Funding / Bridging Finance for Community groups
 Banks and Credit unions not interested
 Clan Credo – interest @ 6% - max lending is €500,000 to
one group
 Cost of application to new communities – professional
required to do the application for communities

12. Challenges
 Non SEAI registered contractors allowed
 Contractors have a learning curve to comply with SEAI
regulations for the BEC scheme – meet standards
 KSN inspectors – varying opinions on the standards –
this needs to be the same across the board

13. Challenges
 Recruiting houses – 1st year was the hardest – now
there is a waiting list in the parishes
 Convincing “Can Pay” homes to invest more money –
30% grant could be increased – bonus money for 3 or
more items upgraded
 Community Committees – dealing with people from
all different backgrounds – decision making slow

14. Positives
 Application stage has improved – better cross checks
 Milestone payments – keep interest rates down
 SEAI Staff very helpful
 Local contractors – homeowners happier because they
know and trust contractors
 160 houses retrofitted over 3 years – a lot of these
houses would never have been touched

15. Positives
 Excellent program – bringing life back into our
communities
 People have more comfort in their homes
 Provide local employment
 Significant cost saving in the community
 Significant reductions in carbon emissions
 A win win for the individuals, the community and the
country.
 First project of its kind in the country.

16. Government input
 More money available to the BEC program – reduced
by half this year – with 75 applications received
 Energy Credit unit costs could be increased -more
finance from Energy Providers
 Tax breaks for contractors willing to provide bridging
finance to communities to run projects instead of
lending from banks / Clan credo.

17. The Future
 People are willing to get involved – stimulating work
and energy efficiency savings for the country
 Doing it from the bottom up – communities feel
ownership of the projects – more involvement.
 2015 project included 8 communities
 Project is going from strength to strength – and can be
replicated throughout the country.

18. By Marcella Maher Keogh