1. Energy-Efficient Reliable Routing
Considering Residual Energy in
Wireless Ad-hoc Networks
Guided by,
Mrs.M.JEYA SUNDARI,
Asst Prof/CSE DEPT,
VPMMECW.
Presented by,
G.ANANTHI,
K.ILLAKIYA.

2. ENERGY SAVING
 Energy saving is the
meaning of energy
conservation.
 Conserving is a
critical concern in
the design of routing
protocols for ad hoc
networks.

3.  Energy conservation refers to reducing energy
consumption through using less of an energy
service.
 Because most of nodes operate with limited
battery capacity and energy.
• For example :
driving less is an example of energy
conservation.

4.  Energy conservation and efficiency are both
energy reduction techniques.
 Even though energy conservation reduces
energy services.
 It can result to increase the reliability

5. ABSTRACT
• The two novel energy-aware routing
algorithms for wireless ad hoc networks, called
RMECR and RMER.
• RMECR is able to find energy-efficient and
reliable routes.
• These algorithms used to increase the lifetime
of the node .

6. Analysis
1.Existing system
2.Proposed system

7. EXISTING SYSTEM
 It should not result in
finding less reliable
routes or overusing a
specific set of nodes
in the network.
 It does not consider
the remaining
battery energy.

8. Disadvantages
 It has less reliable.
 It can’t increase the operational life time of the
network.
 Overusing the specific node.

9. PROPOSED SYSTEM
 We proposed a new
routing algorithm for
wireless ad hoc
networks namely
RMECR.
 It increase the
battery life time.

10.  We proposed
networks for
retransmission:
 Hop-by-hop
(or)
 End-to-end

11. ALGORITHM
 RMECR
It finds routes which require least amount
of energy for reliable packet transfer.
The remaining battery energy which is
consumed by a node to forward a packet.
Include the energy consumed for
retransmission of the packets as well,
When the packet (or) its acknowledgement is
lost.

12. Advantages
 We used a detailed energy consumption model
for packet transfer.
 It extends the network lifetime.
 It also having more amount of battery energy.
 It ensure the reliablity and retransmission.

13. LITERATURE SURVEY
MINIMUM ENERGY PATHS FOR
RELIABLE COMMUNICATION IN
MULTI-HOP WIRELESS NETWORK
 Minimum-energy routing in wireless network a
typically select minimum-cost multi-hop paths.
 The transmission power is fixed.

14.  We are using the energy aware routing
algorithm.
 These algorithm select a path with a large
number of small distance hops.
 A formulation based on solely on the energy
spent in a single transmission is misleading.

15. Characteristics
 The battery power available on the constituent
lightweight mobile nodes.
 Communication costs are often much higher
than computing costs.
 To ensure the reliable packet delivery.

16. Advantage
 It reliably delivering the packet to final
destination.
 That have identical error rates.
 It will frequently used to forward packets.

17. Disadvantage
 Less number of retransmission.
 Nodes along this method will fail quickly.
 The life time of the battery is to low.
 Do not considered the remaining battery
energy.
 Overusing of nodes.

18. REFERENCE
 [1] D.S.J. De Couto, D. Aguayo, J. Bicket, and R.
Morris, “A HighThroughput Path Metric for Multi-
Hop Wireless Routing,” Proc. ACM MobiCom, pp.
134-146, 2003.
 [2] S. Singh and C. Raghavendra, “PAMAS—
Power Aware MultiAccess Protocol with Signalling
for Ad Hoc Networks,” ACM Computer Comm.
Rev., vol. 28, pp. 5-26, 1999.
 [3] S. Banerjee and A. Misra, “Minimum Energy
Paths for Reliable
Communication in Multi-Hop Wireless Networks,”
Proc. ACM in 2012.

19.  [4] J. Gomez, A.T. Campbell, M. Naghshineh, and C.
Bisdikian,
“PARO: Supporting Dynamic Power Controlled Routing
in
Wireless Ad Hoc Networks,” Wireless Networks, vol. 9,
no.5,
pp. 443-460, 2003.
 [5] S. Banerjee and A. Misra, “Minimum Energy Paths
for Reliable
Communication in Multi-Hop Wireless Networks,”
Proc. ACM
MobiHoc, pp. 146-156, June 2002.

20. Thank
You