Fabián Andrés Varela,
Commercial Office of Pro Ecuador in Korea
PUBLIC TRANSPORT IN
QUITO: toward
an efficient and citizen-
oriented
Public Transportation
July 1st
2014
CONTENTS
Background and Purpose
Current Status and Issues
Improvement Strategy
Specific Action Plan
Expected Results
Background and Purpose
 Quito formally San Francisco de Quito, is the capital city of Ecuador,
and at an elevation of 9,350 feet (2,800 meters above sea level), it
is the highest official capital city in the world.)
 Population:
 Capital city: 1,619,146
 Metropolitan District: 2,239,191
 Foundation: December 6, 1534
 Coordinates: 00°15′00″S 78°35′00″W
 Declared a World Heritage Site by UNESCO (1978).
Background
1. Private car ownership has increased.
2. The transportation sector has not
changed old practices toward an user-
oriented service
3. Bus drivers do not always stop at
defined bus stops. They partially held a
monopoly thinking the routes are
personal property
4. Bus operators compete for profitable
routes
5. Bus drivers put in risk citizens lives while
speeding up to take up more
passengers.
6. In Quito many of the traffic accidents are
caused by bus drivers.
Metropolitan District of Quito Population
225,600
354,746
599,828
866,472
1,094,318
2,239,191
1,464,970
0
200,000
400,000
600,000
800,000
1,000,000
1,200,000
1,400,000
1,600,000
1,800,000
2,000,000
2,200,000
2,400,000
1950
1962
1974
1982
1990
2000
2010
Quito has grown, transportation
has become perhaps its number
one problem. We have launched
an ambitious program of public
transportation that includes the
construction of the Metro.
The new metro is expected to be
operational by 2017.
Purpose
- Provide a passenger-oriented service.
- Ensure drivers service and passenger
safety.
- Decrease the number of traffic
accidents caused by bus operators.
- Provide accurate information for policy
and decision makers (reliable
information sources for future
improvements/planning).
Current Status and Issues
Implemented Strategies
The Integrate System includes:
1.Trolebus (three electric bus routes)
with an exclusive lane.
2. Some bus Lines "Feeders“ (but
most of the bus lines are still private).
3.Terminals and stops transfer of
backbone with prepaid system.
4.Centralized traffic light system.
Implemented Strategies
Challenges and Obstacles
• Passengers' dissatisfaction with the service quality.
• Bus operator’s overheated competition for profitable routes.
• Bus services not completely integrated within the transport
network.
• Buses and Trolebus getting more and more crowded.
• Buses do not have an preferential line contributing to the traffic
congestion which is a major problem in our capital.
• Limited access to outlying districts.
• Resistance from private operators.
• Lack of funding for public works transportation.
•There is no a unified distance-based face pricing system.
Improvement Strategy
Sustainable Transport Paradigm
Sustainable Transport
Human-
oriented
Public
transport
oriented
Social
inclusive
Energy
efficient
How it can be done?
All at once not incremental
Networking the municipal government, bus
operators, civil society and experts .
Target?
BUS REFORM
CITIZEN COMMITTEE
Semi-public operation (private don’t have to compete)
Reorganizing bus routes to reach rural and isolated
neighborhoods
Bus management System
Traffic Control System
Smart card
Specific Action Plan
Action plan
1. Define operational zones and bus companies/operators.
• Type of company and size.
• Bidding process for most profitable routes.
• Issuance of operating licenses.
2. Implementation of a dedicated bus lane system.
3. Establish an integrated transportation system.
(Trolley/Articulated bus + Metro + Common type of buses)
4. Apply a unified fare system based on distance. (use of
transport cards while discontinuing the use of cash).
• Provide discount rate for students, disable and elders.
5. Reach an agreement between actors for system’s operation
and management.
• Assessment of revenues and subsidies.
• Establishment of a committee for joint revenue
management.
Good initiatives to consider
1. No driving day program
• Tax incentives. Gas price. Insurance incentives.
2. Implementation of cameras on buses to identify plates of
illegally parked vehicles impeding traffic flow.
3. Consolidation of databases and information sharing
between government institutions (avoid unnecessary costs
and redundant data systems).
Expected Results
Expected results
Bus Management
System (CCTV, GPS, etc.)
Ensure drivers service and passenger
safety.
Decrease the number of traffic
accidents caused by bus operators.
Real time information to the public.
People can manage their time in a
better way.
Provide accurate information for policy
and decision makers (statistics for
future improvements).
ICTs in Public Transportation
Smart Card System:
Joint revenue management.
Transparent revenue
management.
Transfer discount (don’t have
to pay again if you change
bus within 30 minutes).
Application of distance-based
system.
Thank you !

[e-Government Program Action Plan : Quito, Ecuador]

  • 1.
    Fabián Andrés Varela, CommercialOffice of Pro Ecuador in Korea PUBLIC TRANSPORT IN QUITO: toward an efficient and citizen- oriented Public Transportation July 1st 2014
  • 2.
    CONTENTS Background and Purpose CurrentStatus and Issues Improvement Strategy Specific Action Plan Expected Results
  • 3.
  • 4.
     Quito formallySan Francisco de Quito, is the capital city of Ecuador, and at an elevation of 9,350 feet (2,800 meters above sea level), it is the highest official capital city in the world.)  Population:  Capital city: 1,619,146  Metropolitan District: 2,239,191  Foundation: December 6, 1534  Coordinates: 00°15′00″S 78°35′00″W  Declared a World Heritage Site by UNESCO (1978).
  • 5.
    Background 1. Private carownership has increased. 2. The transportation sector has not changed old practices toward an user- oriented service 3. Bus drivers do not always stop at defined bus stops. They partially held a monopoly thinking the routes are personal property 4. Bus operators compete for profitable routes 5. Bus drivers put in risk citizens lives while speeding up to take up more passengers. 6. In Quito many of the traffic accidents are caused by bus drivers.
  • 6.
    Metropolitan District ofQuito Population 225,600 354,746 599,828 866,472 1,094,318 2,239,191 1,464,970 0 200,000 400,000 600,000 800,000 1,000,000 1,200,000 1,400,000 1,600,000 1,800,000 2,000,000 2,200,000 2,400,000 1950 1962 1974 1982 1990 2000 2010 Quito has grown, transportation has become perhaps its number one problem. We have launched an ambitious program of public transportation that includes the construction of the Metro. The new metro is expected to be operational by 2017.
  • 7.
    Purpose - Provide apassenger-oriented service. - Ensure drivers service and passenger safety. - Decrease the number of traffic accidents caused by bus operators. - Provide accurate information for policy and decision makers (reliable information sources for future improvements/planning).
  • 8.
  • 9.
    Implemented Strategies The IntegrateSystem includes: 1.Trolebus (three electric bus routes) with an exclusive lane. 2. Some bus Lines "Feeders“ (but most of the bus lines are still private). 3.Terminals and stops transfer of backbone with prepaid system. 4.Centralized traffic light system.
  • 10.
  • 11.
    Challenges and Obstacles •Passengers' dissatisfaction with the service quality. • Bus operator’s overheated competition for profitable routes. • Bus services not completely integrated within the transport network. • Buses and Trolebus getting more and more crowded. • Buses do not have an preferential line contributing to the traffic congestion which is a major problem in our capital. • Limited access to outlying districts. • Resistance from private operators. • Lack of funding for public works transportation. •There is no a unified distance-based face pricing system.
  • 12.
  • 13.
    Sustainable Transport Paradigm SustainableTransport Human- oriented Public transport oriented Social inclusive Energy efficient
  • 14.
    How it canbe done? All at once not incremental Networking the municipal government, bus operators, civil society and experts . Target? BUS REFORM CITIZEN COMMITTEE Semi-public operation (private don’t have to compete) Reorganizing bus routes to reach rural and isolated neighborhoods Bus management System Traffic Control System Smart card
  • 15.
  • 16.
    Action plan 1. Defineoperational zones and bus companies/operators. • Type of company and size. • Bidding process for most profitable routes. • Issuance of operating licenses. 2. Implementation of a dedicated bus lane system. 3. Establish an integrated transportation system. (Trolley/Articulated bus + Metro + Common type of buses) 4. Apply a unified fare system based on distance. (use of transport cards while discontinuing the use of cash). • Provide discount rate for students, disable and elders. 5. Reach an agreement between actors for system’s operation and management. • Assessment of revenues and subsidies. • Establishment of a committee for joint revenue management.
  • 17.
    Good initiatives toconsider 1. No driving day program • Tax incentives. Gas price. Insurance incentives. 2. Implementation of cameras on buses to identify plates of illegally parked vehicles impeding traffic flow. 3. Consolidation of databases and information sharing between government institutions (avoid unnecessary costs and redundant data systems).
  • 18.
  • 19.
    Expected results Bus Management System(CCTV, GPS, etc.) Ensure drivers service and passenger safety. Decrease the number of traffic accidents caused by bus operators. Real time information to the public. People can manage their time in a better way. Provide accurate information for policy and decision makers (statistics for future improvements).
  • 20.
    ICTs in PublicTransportation Smart Card System: Joint revenue management. Transparent revenue management. Transfer discount (don’t have to pay again if you change bus within 30 minutes). Application of distance-based system.
  • 21.