CRJ 514 Entire Course NEW

ASH CRJ 514 Week 1 Assignment Classical School
of Criminology and Present Day Crime and Crime
Prevention NEW
To purchase this material click
http://www.uopassignments.com/crj-512-ash/crj-
512-week-1-assignment-classical-school-of-
criminology-and-present-day-crime-and-crime-
prevention-recent
For more classes visit
www.uopassignments.com
Classical School of Criminology and Present Day
Crime and Crime Prevention. Due by Day 7. The
primary argument of the classical school of
criminology is that offenders commit crimes due

to rational choice. As discussed in the Classical
School of Criminology video, rational choice theory
focuses on offenders weighing the risks versus
rewards prior to engaging in a criminal act
(Dorsey, 2013). If the risks are low and the
rewards are high, the offender will engage in the
crime. However, if the risks are high and the
reward is low, the offender generally will not
engage in the offense. In addition to the
aforementioned, the classical school of
criminology also contends that punishment is the
primary way to deter crime. In order for
punishment to be effective, it must be swift,
severe, and certain. In your paper,
Explain how crime can be prevented as it relates to
the beliefs of the classical school of criminology;
Assess the major components of the classical
school of crime causation;
Discuss specific and general deterrence as it
relates to the presence of punishment and the
challenges to create deterrence in today’s society;
and
Discuss how risk can be increased and rewards
decreased as it relates to conventional crimes and
the rational choice theory.

Your paper must Be three to five double-spaced
pages in length (not including title and references
pages) and formatted according to APA style as
outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
Include a separate title page with the following:
o Title of paper
o Student’s name
o Course name and number o Instructor’s name
o Date submitted
Use at least five scholarly sources in addition to
the course text and the article being evaluated.
Document all sources in APA style as outlined in
the Ashford Writing Center.
Include a separate references page that is
formatted according to APA style as outlined in the
Ashford Writing Center.

ASH CRJ 514 Week 1 DQ 2 Resource Reading - How
to Read a Case and Research Article - Wrongful
Conviction NEW
514-week-1-dq-2-resource-reading-how-to-read-
a-case-and-research-article-wrongful-conviction-
recent
Resource Reading - How to Read a Case and
Research Article
Carefully examine “How to Read a Research
Article” from Section II of your text (Spohn &
Hemmens, 2012, pp. 42-45). Using the 10 criteria

for review found in the text, prepare a critical
analysis of one of the four articles which
immediately follow the analyses techniques:
“The Process Is the Punishment: Handling Cases in
a Lower Criminal Court” (Feeley, 1971, as cited in
Spohn & Hemmens, 2012, pp. 46-55);
“The Honest Politician’s Guide to Juvenile Justice
in the Twenty-First Century” (Feld, 1994, as cited
in Spohn & Hemmens, 2012, pp. 55-67);
“The Rehnquist Court and Criminal Justice: An
Empirical Assessment” (Smith, 2003, as cited in
Spohn & Hemmens, 2012, pp. 67-83); or
“Wrongful Conviction: Perceptions of Criminal
Justice Professionals Regarding the Frequency of
Wrongful Conviction and the Extent of System
Errors” (Ramsey & Frank, 2007, as cited in Spohn
& Hemmens, 2012, pp. 83-107).

ASH CRJ 514 Week 2 Assignment U.S. Supreme
Court Bill of Rights Case Miranda v. Arizona NEW
514-week-2-assignment-us-supreme-court-bill-of-
rights-case-miranda-v-arizona-recent
U.S. Supreme Court Bill of Rights Case.
For this assignment, you will analyze one U.S.
Supreme Court criminal case decision dealing with
a Bill of Rights issue. You must include the facts of
the case (i.e., what happened), the holding of the
court (i.e., what the court decided), and the
reasoning for that decision. Additionally, explain
how the constitutional right is practically applied
to protect the individual and/or society as a whole.
Provide your personal opinion on the relative

strength and/or weakness of this constitutional
issue moving forward in the 21st century. Select
one of the following five options:
Gideon v. Wainwright
In re Gault
Mapp v. Ohio
Miranda v. Arizona
Terry v. Ohio
You may examine a different case, but you must
obtain instructor approval by Day 3 (Thursday) of
Week Two.
Your paper must
Be three to five double-spaced pages in length (not
including title and references pages) and
o Titleofpaper
o Student’sname

o Course name and number o Instructor’sname
o Datesubmitted
Use at least three scholarly sources in addition to
the course text.
Share Share on Facebook Tweet Tweet on
Twitter Pin it Pin on Pinterest

ASH CRJ 514 Week 2 DQ 1 Plea Bargaining NEW
514-week-2-dq-1-plea-bargaining-recent
As you learned in your readings this week, a vast
majority of criminal cases are resolved through
plea bargaining. Evaluate when plea bargaining
can occur, the ethics of plea bargaining, and how
plea bargaining affects the criminal justice
process. Speculate on what would happen to the
criminal justice system without plea bargaining,
and propose alternatives to the plea bargaining
process to enhance justice and efficiency to the
criminal justice process. It is recommended that
your post contain approximately 400 words.

ASH CRJ 514 Week 3 Assignment Final Paper
Outline - Capital Punishment NEW
514-week-3-assignment-final-paper-outline-
capital-punishment-recent
For this assignment, you will construct a
comprehensive outline for the Final Paper, which
is due at the end of Week Six. For assistance with
creating and formatting your outline, please access
the sample outline handout from the Ashford
Writing Center.
Your outline must
including the title and references pages) and

Detail your chosen issue to be addressed in your
Final Paper.
Provide a brief history of the U.S. Supreme Court’s
philosophy of your chosen issue.
Detail your preliminary conclusion about the
future of this issue in light of the current makeup
of the U.S. Supreme Court.
o Titleofpaper
o Student’sname
o Datesubmitted
Use at least four scholarly sources in addition to
the course text, two of which must be from the
Ashford University Library.

ASH CRJ 514 Week 3 DQ 1 Analyze One U.S.
Supreme Court Justice NEW
514-week-3-dq-1-analyze-one-us-supreme-court-
justice-recent
Choose one, current Supreme Court justice, and
provide a biography of significant events in the
justice’s life, the political labels placed on the
justice, an examination of whether or not that
political label is accurate, and an analysis of the
judge’s philosophy on constitutional issues. It is
recommended that your post contain
approximately 400 words

ASH CRJ 514 Week 3 DQ 2 Constitutional Rights of
Defendants NEW
514-week-3-dq-2-constitutional-rights-of-
defendants-recent
The U.S. Constitution provides multiple rights for
someone accused of a crime—the defendant in a
criminal case filed by a prosecutor. Choose one
right for the accused, and explain why this is the
most significant safeguard for criminal
defendants. Discuss at least two U.S. Supreme
Court opinions which interpreted this right. Did
the Supreme Court limit or expand upon the plain
language from the U.S. Constitution? In what way?
Discuss the relevance of the right in modern
society. It is recommended that your post contain
approximately 400 words.

ASH CRJ 514 Week 4 Assignment Criminal Process
Arraignment to Pre-Trial NEW
514-week-4-assignment-criminal-process-
arraignment-to-pre-trial-recent
For this assignment, you will examine
constitutional protections for defendants prior to
trial by providing a detailed analysis of the
criminal justice process from arraignment to the
setting of a trial for a defendant. At a minimum,
your paper must detail how a criminal charge is
filed, the pre-trial process, the parties and players
of the criminal justice process, and the defendant’s
rights through pre-trial proceedings.
Your paper must

o Titleofpaper
o Student’sname
o Course name and number o Instructor’s name
o Datesubmitted
the course text.

ASH CRJ 514 Week 4 DQ 1 Modern Composition of
U.S. Supreme Court NEW
514-week-4-dq-1-modern-composition-of-us-
supreme-court-recent
Explore the ideological tendencies of the majority
and minority of the current U.S. Supreme Court.
What is meant by liberal or conservative judges?
Considering the process for selecting Supreme
Court justices, is it possible for politics to not play
a role in the process? Explain how these
ideological/political tendencies shape U.S.
Supreme Court opinions. It is recommended that
your post contain approximately 400 words.
Guided Response:

The vast majority of legal scholars who review
Supreme Court cases agree on the political
leanings of varying U.S. Supreme Court eras.
Explain the consensus of the current Supreme
Court, and evaluate how that political leaning will
shape pending U.S. Supreme Court issues. Review
your colleagues posts, and substantively respond
to at least two of your peers. Continue to monitor
the discussion forum until 5:00 p.m. (Mountain
Time) on Day 7 of the week, and respond with
robust dialogue to anyone who replies to your
initial post.

ASH CRJ 514 Week 4 DQ 2 Evaluate a Modern U.S.
Supreme Court Criminal Case, 2005 or Later NEW
514-week-4-dq-2-evaluate-a-modern-us-supreme-
court-criminal-case-2005-or-later-recent
Analyze a criminal case opinion issued by the U.S.
Supreme Court, 2005 or later; explain the issue(s)
in the case, the holding of the case, its basis, the
number of justices for and against the opinion, and
whether it set precedent (i.e., new law) or merely
reaffirmed long-standing constitutional values.
Identify the justice who authored the opinion, and
provide that justice’s ideology. You may choose
any case listed below, or locate a criminal U.S.
Supreme Court case, 2005 or later, to analyze. It is
recommended that your post contain
approximately 400 words.
Clark v. Arizona (2006) [Insanity Defense]
Davis v. United States (2011) [Illegal Search
Admissible]

Davis v. Washington (2006) [911 Call Admissible
at trial?]
Florida v. Powell (2009) [Miranda Warnings]
Giles v. California (2008) [Dead victim’s
statements not admissible at trial?]
Graham v. Florida (2010) [Life Sentence for
Juvenile Violate Eighth Amendment?]
Greenlaw v. United States (2008) [Can court
enhance sentence without prosecutor request?]
Herring v. United States (2009) [Erroneous Search
Warrant Require Suppression of Evidence?]
Holmes v. South Carolina (2006) [Exclude Defense
Evidence?]
Hudson v. Michigan (2006) [Fourth Amendment
“Knock and Announce” Rule]
J.D.B. v. North Carolina (2011) [Age Matter for
Miranda Warnings?]
Kennedy v. Louisana (2007) [Death penalty for
child rape?]

ASH CRJ 514 Week 5 Assignment Criminal Process
Post-Trial NEW
514-week-5-assignment-criminal-process-post-
trial-recent
For this assignment, prepare a three to five page
paper (excluding the APA title and references
pages) in which you detail the process after a
criminal trial. In your paper, explain what happens
with the defendant and the case after an acquittal.
Detail the sentencing process after conviction, and
evaluate the defendant’s right of allocution.
Discuss victims’ rights at sentencing. Explain when
an appeal is available for either the defense or
prosecution, and provide a “road map” for a court
to reach the U.S. Supreme Court from a trial court.
Your paper must

o Titleofpaper
o Student’sname
o Datesubmitted
the course text.

ASH CRJ 514 Week 5 Discussion 2 DQ 2 Supreme
Court Review NEW
514-week-5-discussion-2-dq-2-supreme-court-
review-recent
Analyze the ways in which a criminal case can get
to the U.S. Supreme Court. Which cases must the
Supreme Court review, and which cases do they
have discretion on whether or not to render an
opinion? What is the court’s discretionary
jurisdiction called? It is recommended that your
post contain approximately 400 words.
Guided Response:
Very few cases must be reviewed by the U.S.
Supreme Court. Provide your opinion of whether
or not more cases should be mandatorily reviewed

by the nation’s higher court. One option the Court
has is to let lower court cases stand. In essence, the
Court may ignore reviewing a case because the
Court either agrees with the lower court, or
believes that the case is not important enough for
review. Analyze whether or not this is the best
legal standard for review. Review your colleagues
posts, and substantively respond to at least two of
your peers. Continue to monitor the discussion
forum until 5:00 p.m. (Mountain Time) on Day 7 of
the week, and respond with robust dialogue to
anyone who replies to your initial post.

ASH CRJ 514 Week 6 Assignment Supreme Court
Philosophies and Rulings NEW
514-week-6-assignment-supreme-court-
philosophies-and-rulings-recent
Garnering all of the information about
constitutional rights and the justice process you
have received from this course and your
understanding of the “personalities” of the U.S.
Supreme Court, prepare a six to eight page paper
(not including the APA title and references pages)
in which you detail the history of the Supreme
Court from 1953 to the present day as it relates to
one of the specific issues listed below. Evaluate the
terms of the Warren Court (1953-1969), the
Burger Court (1969-1986), the Rehnquist Court
(1986-2005), and the current Roberts Court
(2005-present) to your chosen issue, listed below.
Examine the political philosophies of each court,

and indicate significant changes in the law
concerning your chosen issue that was witnessed
through each court’s era. Then, examine the
current makeup of the U.S. Supreme Court and
modern trends in constitutional law and criminal
procedure. Based on current trends, discuss
whether or not you believe the criminal justice
process will fundamentally change or remain the
same in the foreseeable future for your chosen
issue.
Your paper will focus on the court process, judicial
process, and constitutional issues for one of the
following issues:
The right against self-incrimination and the right
to remain silent (U.S. Const. amend. V)
The right to privacy for computer, Internet, and
cell phone property and communications (U.S.
Const. amend. IV)
Search and seizure laws as applied to computer,
Internet, and cell phone property and
communications (U.S. Const. amend. IV)

Right to counsel (U.S. Const. amend. VI)
Capital punishment and cruel and unusual
punishment (U.S. Const. amend. VIII)
Right to trial in criminal proceedings (U.S. Const.
amend. VI)
National security considerations
You may choose a different issue, but you must
obtain instructor approval by the end of Week
Two.
The Final Paper must
Be six to eight double-spaced pages in length (not
including title and references pages) and be
Title of paper

Student’s name
Course name and number
Instructor’s name
Date submitted
Use at least eight scholarly sources in addition to
the course text.
Carefully review the Grading Rubric for the
criteria that will be used to evaluate your
assignment.

ASH CRJ 514 Week 6 Final Paper Capital
Punishment NEW
514-week-6-final-paper-capital-punishment-
recent
CRJ 514 Week 6 Final Paper Capital Punishment
NEW

CRJ 514 Entire Course NEW

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to CRJ 514 Entire Course NEW

Similar to CRJ 514 Entire Course NEW (9)

More from shyamuopseven

More from shyamuopseven (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

CRJ 514 Entire Course NEW