SEENET-MTP, profile picture
Uploaded bySEENET-MTP
228 views

Radoslav Rashkov "Integrable structures in low-dimensional holography and cosmologies"

This document outlines R.C. Rashkov's presentation on integrable structures in low-dimensional holography and cosmology. The presentation covers several topics: (1) the Möbius structure of entanglement entropy and its relation to dispersionless Toda hierarchies, (2) holographic entanglement entropy of excited states, (3) higher spin holography and higher projective invariants, and (4) bulk reconstruction and its consequences. The presentation also discusses conceptual issues regarding the duality between gravity/string theories and gauge theories, such as how information is encoded in the boundary theory and whether spacetime and gravity can emerge from a boundary theory.

Embed presentation

Download to read offline
1 / 111
2 / 111
3 / 111
4 / 111
5 / 111
6 / 111
7 / 111
8 / 111
9 / 111
10 / 111
11 / 111
12 / 111
13 / 111
14 / 111
15 / 111
16 / 111
17 / 111
18 / 111
19 / 111
20 / 111
21 / 111
22 / 111
23 / 111
24 / 111
25 / 111
26 / 111
27 / 111
28 / 111
29 / 111
30 / 111
31 / 111
32 / 111
33 / 111
34 / 111
35 / 111
36 / 111
37 / 111
38 / 111
39 / 111
40 / 111
41 / 111
42 / 111
43 / 111
44 / 111
45 / 111
46 / 111
47 / 111
48 / 111
49 / 111
50 / 111
51 / 111
52 / 111
53 / 111
54 / 111
55 / 111
56 / 111
57 / 111
58 / 111
59 / 111
60 / 111
61 / 111
62 / 111
63 / 111
64 / 111
65 / 111
66 / 111
67 / 111
68 / 111
69 / 111
70 / 111
71 / 111
72 / 111
73 / 111
74 / 111
75 / 111
76 / 111
77 / 111
78 / 111
79 / 111
80 / 111
81 / 111
82 / 111
83 / 111
84 / 111
85 / 111
86 / 111
87 / 111
88 / 111
89 / 111
90 / 111
91 / 111
92 / 111
93 / 111
94 / 111
95 / 111
96 / 111
97 / 111
98 / 111
99 / 111
100 / 111
101 / 111
102 / 111
103 / 111
104 / 111
105 / 111
106 / 111
107 / 111
108 / 111
109 / 111
110 / 111
111 / 111
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Department of Physics, Sofia University, † ITP, Vienna University of Technology Field Theory and the Early Universe – BW2018, Nis, Serbia, 10-14 June, 2018 ——————– This project was partially supported by BNSF grant DN 18/1, SU Research Fund grants 85/2018, ??/2018, NORDITA Program ”Correlation functions and solvable models” and SEENET-TMP.
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Content:
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Content: Motivation
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Content: Motivation Holographic Entanglement Entropy (EE) of excited states and theit representations
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Content: Motivation Holographic Entanglement Entropy (EE) of excited states and theit representations Integrable structures in Low-dimesional Holography
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Content: Motivation Holographic Entanglement Entropy (EE) of excited states and theit representations Integrable structures in Low-dimesional Holography Higher spin theories, higher projective invariants and W-geometry
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Content: Motivation Holographic Entanglement Entropy (EE) of excited states and theit representations Integrable structures in Low-dimesional Holography Higher spin theories, higher projective invariants and W-geometry Bulk reconstruction and consequences
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Content: Motivation Holographic Entanglement Entropy (EE) of excited states and theit representations Integrable structures in Low-dimesional Holography Higher spin theories, higher projective invariants and W-geometry Bulk reconstruction and consequences Conclusions
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final String(Gravity)/Gauge theory duality • Conceptual issues:
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final String(Gravity)/Gauge theory duality • Conceptual issues: If gravity(string) theory is dual to certain gauge theory, it should be possible to reconstruct any of them from the other!
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final String(Gravity)/Gauge theory duality • Conceptual issues: If gravity(string) theory is dual to certain gauge theory, it should be possible to reconstruct any of them from the other! If the above statement is true, the (quantum) gravity should be encoded in the boundary theory!
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final String(Gravity)/Gauge theory duality • Conceptual issues: If gravity(string) theory is dual to certain gauge theory, it should be possible to reconstruct any of them from the other! If the above statement is true, the (quantum) gravity should be encoded in the boundary theory! In view of the above, should we think of space-time, ergo gravity as an emergent phenomenon?
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final String(Gravity)/Gauge theory duality • Conceptual issues: If gravity(string) theory is dual to certain gauge theory, it should be possible to reconstruct any of them from the other! If the above statement is true, the (quantum) gravity should be encoded in the boundary theory! In view of the above, should we think of space-time, ergo gravity as an emergent phenomenon? continuing · · · ?????????????????????!
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final String(Gravity)/Gauge theory duality • Conceptual issues: If gravity(string) theory is dual to certain gauge theory, it should be possible to reconstruct any of them from the other! If the above statement is true, the (quantum) gravity should be encoded in the boundary theory! In view of the above, should we think of space-time, ergo gravity as an emergent phenomenon? continuing · · · ?????????????????????! The first questions to ask:
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final String(Gravity)/Gauge theory duality • Conceptual issues: If gravity(string) theory is dual to certain gauge theory, it should be possible to reconstruct any of them from the other! If the above statement is true, the (quantum) gravity should be encoded in the boundary theory! In view of the above, should we think of space-time, ergo gravity as an emergent phenomenon? continuing · · · ?????????????????????! The first questions to ask: • How to match the degrees of freedom on both sides of duality ?
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final String(Gravity)/Gauge theory duality • Conceptual issues: If gravity(string) theory is dual to certain gauge theory, it should be possible to reconstruct any of them from the other! If the above statement is true, the (quantum) gravity should be encoded in the boundary theory! In view of the above, should we think of space-time, ergo gravity as an emergent phenomenon? continuing · · · ?????????????????????! The first questions to ask: • How to match the degrees of freedom on both sides of duality ? • How exactly the information from the bulk is encoded in the boundary theory ?
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Ryu-Takayanagi holographic entanglement Let us have a CFTin a state |Ψ defined on a spacetime geometry B. Suppose the state |Ψ is associated with the geometry of a dual theory in a space MΨ whose boundary is B.
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Ryu-Takayanagi holographic entanglement Let us have a CFTin a state |Ψ defined on a spacetime geometry B. Suppose the state |Ψ is associated with the geometry of a dual theory in a space MΨ whose boundary is B. Let us consider a spacial subsystem A of the CFT and let SA is its entropy , i.e. it measures the entanglement of the fields in A with the rest of the system.
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Ryu-Takayanagi holographic entanglement Let us have a CFTin a state |Ψ defined on a spacetime geometry B. Suppose the state |Ψ is associated with the geometry of a dual theory in a space MΨ whose boundary is B. Let us consider a spacial subsystem A of the CFT and let SA is its entropy , i.e. it measures the entanglement of the fields in A with the rest of the system. Thus: S(A) = 1 4GN Area( ˜A), (1)
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Ryu-Takayanagi holographic entanglement Let us have a CFTin a state |Ψ defined on a spacetime geometry B. Suppose the state |Ψ is associated with the geometry of a dual theory in a space MΨ whose boundary is B. Let us consider a spacial subsystem A of the CFT and let SA is its entropy , i.e. it measures the entanglement of the fields in A with the rest of the system. Thus: S(A) = 1 4GN Area( ˜A), (1) • The surface ˜A is co-dimension 2 extremal surface with the same boundary as A!
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Ryu-Takayanagi holographic entanglement Let us have a CFTin a state |Ψ defined on a spacetime geometry B. Suppose the state |Ψ is associated with the geometry of a dual theory in a space MΨ whose boundary is B. Let us consider a spacial subsystem A of the CFT and let SA is its entropy , i.e. it measures the entanglement of the fields in A with the rest of the system. Thus: S(A) = 1 4GN Area( ˜A), (1) • The surface ˜A is co-dimension 2 extremal surface with the same boundary as A! • The surface ˜A is homologous to A, where ¯A ∪ A is a boundary of d-dimensional space-like region in MΨ!
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final When the Ryu-Takayanagi formula applies, in 2d S(u, v) is the entanglement entropy of the interval (u, v). u − dv v γ(u − du, v) γ(u, v + dv) u v + dv du dv Figure 1: The choice of intervals. 1
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final When the Ryu-Takayanagi formula applies, in 2d S(u, v) is the entanglement entropy of the interval (u, v). u − dv v γ(u − du, v) γ(u, v + dv) u v + dv du dv Figure 1: The choice of intervals. 1 For intervals A = (u − du, u) and B = (u, v) and C = (v, v + dv), strong subadditivity leads to: S(u − du, v) + S(u, v + dv) − S(u, v) − S(u − du, v + dv) ≈ ∂2 S(u, v) ∂u∂v ≥ 0. (2)
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final When the Ryu-Takayanagi formula applies, in 2d S(u, v) is the entanglement entropy of the interval (u, v). u − dv v γ(u − du, v) γ(u, v + dv) u v + dv du dv Figure 1: The choice of intervals. 1 For intervals A = (u − du, u) and B = (u, v) and C = (v, v + dv), strong subadditivity leads to: S(u − du, v) + S(u, v + dv) − S(u, v) − S(u − du, v + dv) ≈ ∂2 S(u, v) ∂u∂v ≥ 0. (2) • Here S(u, v) is the length of the geodesic connecting the boundary points (u, v) (on the cutoff surface).
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final One way to compute entanglement entropy
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final One way to compute entanglement entropy • The Renyi entropy: Using the replica trick method, the R´enyi entropy for the vacuum is given by exp((1−n)S(n) )= Φ+(z1)Φ−(z2) = 1 (z1−z2)2hn , where twist operators Φ±(z) have dimensions (hn, ¯hn) = c/24(n − 1/n, n − 1/n). The entanglement entropy: taking the limit n → 1 of S(n) Svac= lim n→1 S(n) = lim n→1 log(z1−z2)−2hn = c 12 log (z1−z2) δ2 .
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final One way to compute entanglement entropy • The Renyi entropy: Using the replica trick method, the R´enyi entropy for the vacuum is given by exp((1−n)S(n) )= Φ+(z1)Φ−(z2) = 1 (z1−z2)2hn , where twist operators Φ±(z) have dimensions (hn, ¯hn) = c/24(n − 1/n, n − 1/n). The entanglement entropy: taking the limit n → 1 of S(n) Svac= lim n→1 S(n) = lim n→1 log(z1−z2)−2hn = c 12 log (z1−z2) δ2 . • For excited states |f =Uf |0 the calculation of the R´enyi entropy goes analogously exp((1−n)S(n) ex )=( df dz ) −hn z1 ( df dz ) −hn z2 d ¯f d¯z −¯hn ¯z1 d ¯f d¯z −¯hn ¯z2 0|Φ+(f(z1))Φ−(f(z2))|0 ,
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final One way to compute entanglement entropy • The Renyi entropy: Using the replica trick method, the R´enyi entropy for the vacuum is given by exp((1−n)S(n) )= Φ+(z1)Φ−(z2) = 1 (z1−z2)2hn , where twist operators Φ±(z) have dimensions (hn, ¯hn) = c/24(n − 1/n, n − 1/n). The entanglement entropy: taking the limit n → 1 of S(n) Svac= lim n→1 S(n) = lim n→1 log(z1−z2)−2hn = c 12 log (z1−z2) δ2 . • For excited states |f =Uf |0 the calculation of the R´enyi entropy goes analogously exp((1−n)S(n) ex )=( df dz ) −hn z1 ( df dz ) −hn z2 d ¯f d¯z −¯hn ¯z1 d ¯f d¯z −¯hn ¯z2 0|Φ+(f(z1))Φ−(f(z2))|0 , Sex= lim n→1 S(n) ex = c 12 log f (z1)f (z2) δ2 (f(z1)−f(z2))2 . (3)
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final A second way: Wilson line anchored at the bdy The logic of the considerations: eSEE = G(geodesic length) = Wilson line = mat. element , where the geodesic and the Wilson line end at the boundary of AdS space.
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final A second way: Wilson line anchored at the bdy The logic of the considerations: eSEE = G(geodesic length) = Wilson line = mat. element , where the geodesic and the Wilson line end at the boundary of AdS space. The computations go as follows: Use CS formulation of 3d gravity ; Choose a convenient basis. In our case we choose L1 ∼= L−1 = ∂x; L0 ∼= L0 = x∂x+h; L−1 ∼= L1 = 1 2 x2 ∂x+hx, acting on holomorphic functions of the auxiliary variable x in representation of spin h with Az|y=0 = L1 + 12 c T(z)L−1.
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final A second way: Wilson line anchored at the bdy The logic of the considerations: eSEE = G(geodesic length) = Wilson line = mat. element , where the geodesic and the Wilson line end at the boundary of AdS space. The computations go as follows: Use CS formulation of 3d gravity ; Choose a convenient basis. In our case we choose L1 ∼= L−1 = ∂x; L0 ∼= L0 = x∂x+h; L−1 ∼= L1 = 1 2 x2 ∂x+hx, acting on holomorphic functions of the auxiliary variable x in representation of spin h with Az|y=0 = L1 + 12 c T(z)L−1. Define a generic Wilson line in this setup Wh(zf ; zi) = dx |h P e zf zi dzAa z (z)La x x|.
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Wilson lines, bOPE and OPE blocks: (see 1612.06385) Matrix elements of an open Wilson line with primary operators at the endpoints At general c, a Wilson line with primary endpoints can be written in the compact form h|W(zf ,zi)|h = e zf zi dz 12T (z) c xT (z) 1 xT (zi)2 h , subject to −xT (z) = 1 + 6T(z) c x2 T (z), xT (zf ) = 0, (4) where the function xT (z) is defined by this differential equation.
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final The uniformizing w-coordinates are connected to the Wilson line 1 xT (z) = w (z) 2w (z) − w (z) w(z) + C , with bdy condition C = −w(zf ). We therefore find Conformal block in the presence of heavy state using Wilson line) h|W(zf , zi)|h = limC→−w(zf ) e −2 zf zi dz x T (z)+1 xT (z) 1 xT (zi)2 h = w (zf )w (zi) (w(zf )−w(zi))2 h , exactly reproducing the vacuum Virasoro block for an arbitrary heavy background . - In the case of Higher spin theories an approach based on skew-tau functions has been used, see 1602.06233.
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final • The entanglement entropy is given by Sex = lim n→1 S(n) ex = c 12 log f (z1)f (z2) δ2 (f(z1) − f(z2))2 . (5)
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final • The entanglement entropy is given by Sex = lim n→1 S(n) ex = c 12 log f (z1)f (z2) δ2 (f(z1) − f(z2))2 . (5) • The difference between vacuum entanglement and that of excited states is Svac−Sex= c 12 log f (z1)f (z2) ¯f ( ¯z1) ¯f ( ¯z2)(z1−z2)2 (f(z1)−f(z2)2( ¯f(¯z1)− ¯f(¯z2))2
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final • The entanglement entropy is given by Sex = lim n→1 S(n) ex = c 12 log f (z1)f (z2) δ2 (f(z1) − f(z2))2 . (5) • The difference between vacuum entanglement and that of excited states is Svac−Sex= c 12 log f (z1)f (z2) ¯f ( ¯z1) ¯f ( ¯z2)(z1−z2)2 (f(z1)−f(z2)2( ¯f(¯z1)− ¯f(¯z2))2 • Direct calculations show that (f (z) = 0) the expansion about z is f (z)f (w) (f(z) − f(w))2 = 1 (z − w)2 + 1 6 S(f)(z)
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final • The entanglement entropy is given by Sex = lim n→1 S(n) ex = c 12 log f (z1)f (z2) δ2 (f(z1) − f(z2))2 . (5) • The difference between vacuum entanglement and that of excited states is Svac−Sex= c 12 log f (z1)f (z2) ¯f ( ¯z1) ¯f ( ¯z2)(z1−z2)2 (f(z1)−f(z2)2( ¯f(¯z1)− ¯f(¯z2))2 • Direct calculations show that (f (z) = 0) the expansion about z is f (z)f (w) (f(z) − f(w))2 = 1 (z − w)2 + 1 6 S(f)(z)+ 1 12 S (f)(z)(z − w) + · · · (6) where S(f) denotes the Schwarzian derivative. Some (very incomplete list of) references: hep-th/9403108, hep-th/0405152, 1604.05308,1604.03110, 1606.03307
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final • The entanglement entropy is given by Sex = lim n→1 S(n) ex = c 12 log f (z1)f (z2) δ2 (f(z1) − f(z2))2 . (5) • The difference between vacuum entanglement and that of excited states is Svac−Sex= c 12 log f (z1)f (z2) ¯f ( ¯z1) ¯f ( ¯z2)(z1−z2)2 (f(z1)−f(z2)2( ¯f(¯z1)− ¯f(¯z2))2 • Direct calculations show that (f (z) = 0) the expansion about z is f (z)f (w) (f(z) − f(w))2 = 1 (z − w)2 + 1 6 S(f)(z)+ 1 12 S (f)(z)(z − w) + · · · (6) where S(f) denotes the Schwarzian derivative. Some (very incomplete list of) references: hep-th/9403108, hep-th/0405152, 1604.05308,1604.03110, 1606.03307 ⇒ Next issue: study of the detailed structure of (5)
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final • A simple observation: the exact expression for entanglement entropy satisfies the Louville field equation: δ2 ∂2Sex(f) ∂u∂v = c 6 exp − 12 c Sex(f) . (7)
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final • A simple observation: the exact expression for entanglement entropy satisfies the Louville field equation: δ2 ∂2Sex(f) ∂u∂v = c 6 exp − 12 c Sex(f) . (7) • Let f be a nonconstant meromorphic function on a domain D in the complex plane. For z ∈ D with f(z) = ∞, f (z) = 0, we consider the quantity G(z + w, z) = f (z) f(z + w) − f(z) = 1 w − ∞ n=1 ψn[f](z)wn−1 . The quantities ψn[f](z) are called Aharonov invariants.
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final • A simple observation: the exact expression for entanglement entropy satisfies the Louville field equation: δ2 ∂2Sex(f) ∂u∂v = c 6 exp − 12 c Sex(f) . (7) • Let f be a nonconstant meromorphic function on a domain D in the complex plane. For z ∈ D with f(z) = ∞, f (z) = 0, we consider the quantity G(z + w, z) = f (z) f(z + w) − f(z) = 1 w − ∞ n=1 ψn[f](z)wn−1 . The quantities ψn[f](z) are called Aharonov invariants. • The Aharonov invariants are all invariant under global (M¨obius) transformations.
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Aharonov invariants and Sex(f) • {ψn} exhaust all the M¨obius invariants.
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Aharonov invariants and Sex(f) • {ψn} exhaust all the M¨obius invariants. • The quantity ∂G(ζ, z)/∂ζ ∂G(ζ, z) ∂ζ = − f (z)f (ζ) (f(ζ) − f(z))2 = − 1 (ζ − z)2 − ∞ n=1 (n − 1)ψn[f](z)(ζ − z)n−2 . (8) is invariant under M¨obius transformations ψn[M ◦f] = ψn[f], n ≥ 2.
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Aharonov invariants and Sex(f) • {ψn} exhaust all the M¨obius invariants. • The quantity ∂G(ζ, z)/∂ζ ∂G(ζ, z) ∂ζ = − f (z)f (ζ) (f(ζ) − f(z))2 = − 1 (ζ − z)2 − ∞ n=1 (n − 1)ψn[f](z)(ζ − z)n−2 . (8) is invariant under M¨obius transformations ψn[M ◦f] = ψn[f], n ≥ 2. The expression entering Sex has the expansion: f (z)f (ζ) (f(ζ)−f(z))2 = 1 (ζ−z)2 + ∞ n=1 (n−1)ψn[f](z)(ζ−z)n−2.
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Recursion relations for Aharonov invariants The first two ψn[f] are ψ2[f] = 1 6 f (z) f (z) − 3 2 f (z) f (z) 2 = 1 3! S(f). (9) Aharonov proved the recursion formula: (n+1)ψn[f]=ψn−1[f] + n−2 k=2 ψk[f]ψn−k[f], n≥3. (10) For instance, first few invariants are ψ3[f] = S(f) 4! ; ψ4 = 1 5! [S (f) + 2 S2(f) 3 ]; ψ5 = 1 6! [S (f) + 3 S(f)S (f)]. (11)
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Classes univalent functions and Grunsky coefficients
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Classes univalent functions and Grunsky coefficients • The classes univalent functions we use are ˜S= f(z)=a1z+a2z2+a3z3+···= ∞ n=1 anzn, a1=0 Σ= g(z)=z+b0+ b1 z +···=bz+ ∞ n=0 bnz−n
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Classes univalent functions and Grunsky coefficients • The classes univalent functions we use are ˜S= f(z)=a1z+a2z2+a3z3+···= ∞ n=1 anzn, a1=0 Σ= g(z)=z+b0+ b1 z +···=bz+ ∞ n=0 bnz−n • The functions analytic in (∞, ∞), (∞, 0) and (0, 0): log g(z)−g(ζ) z−ζ , log g(z)−f(ζ) z−ζ , log f(z)−f(ζ) z−ζ •Another definition ( Φ0(w) ≡ 1): g (z) g(z)−w = ∞ n=0 Φn(w)z−n−1, Φn(w)= n m=0 bn,mwm. bn,m are called Grunsky coefficients.
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final • Expansions: log g(z) − g(ζ) z − ζ = − ∞ m,n=1 bmnz−m ζ−n , log g(z) − f(ζ) z − ζ = − ∞ m=1,n=0 bm,−nz−m ζn , log f(z) − f(ζ) z − ζ = − ∞ m=0,n=0 b−m,−nzm ζn .
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final • Expansions: log g(z) − g(ζ) z − ζ = − ∞ m,n=1 bmnz−m ζ−n , log g(z) − f(ζ) z − ζ = − ∞ m=1,n=0 bm,−nz−m ζn , log f(z) − f(ζ) z − ζ = − ∞ m=0,n=0 b−m,−nzm ζn . • Entanglement entropy: f (z)f (w) (f(z) − f(w))2 − 1 (z − w)2 = ∂2 ∂z∂w log f(z) − f(w) z − w = − m,n≥1 mn bmnzm−1 wn−1 . (12)
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final ♦ dToda and Grunsky coefficients • Briefs on dToda hierarchy
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final ♦ dToda and Grunsky coefficients • Briefs on dToda hierarchy Sato approach to integrable hierarchies: introduce pseudodifferential operators Wm = 1 + w1∂−1 + w2∂−2 + · · · + +wm∂−m . (13) and consider W = lim m→∞ Wm = 1 + w1∂−1 + w2∂−2 + w3∂−3 + · · · , (14) where wj(j = 1, 2, . . . ) are functions of (x, t).
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final ♦ dToda and Grunsky coefficients • Briefs on dToda hierarchy Sato approach to integrable hierarchies: introduce pseudodifferential operators Wm = 1 + w1∂−1 + w2∂−2 + · · · + +wm∂−m . (13) and consider W = lim m→∞ Wm = 1 + w1∂−1 + w2∂−2 + w3∂−3 + · · · , (14) where wj(j = 1, 2, . . . ) are functions of (x, t). Define the Lax operator L = W∂W−1 = ∂ + ∞ i=1 ui∂−i+1 , Ln = W∂n W−1 , (15) Define Bn = Ln + B− n = W∂n W−1 + . (16) The Lax equation is ∂L ∂tn = [Bn, L] = BnL − LBn. (17)
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Dispersionless Toda hierarchy Definition The dispersionless Toda hierarchy ∂L ∂tn = {Bn, L}, ∂L ∂¯tn = { ¯Bn, L}, (18) ∂ ¯L ∂tn = {Bn, ¯L}, ∂ ¯L ∂¯tn = { ¯Bn, ¯L}, , (19) where L and ¯L are generating functions of unknowns ui = ui(t, ¯t), ¯ui = ¯ui(t, ¯t), L = p + u1 + u2p−1 + u3p−2 + · · · (20) ¯L = ¯u0p−1 + ¯u1 + ¯u2p + ¯u3p2 + · · · (21) and Bn, ¯Bn are defined by Bn = (Ln )≥0 , ¯Bn = ¯L−n ≤0 . (22)
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final • The equation (22) =⇒ map to n-th Faber polynomial (in certain basis)! The Grunsky coefficients can be identified as bnm = 1/nm(∂nvm) and can be represented in terms of tau-function ( F = log τdToda)!
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final • The equation (22) =⇒ map to n-th Faber polynomial (in certain basis)! The Grunsky coefficients can be identified as bnm = 1/nm(∂nvm) and can be represented in terms of tau-function ( F = log τdToda)! Tau-function and Grunsky coefficients The Grunsky coefficients bnm of the pair (g = w(L), f = w( ¯L)) are related to the tau function, or fee energy as follows: b00=−∂2F ∂t2 0 , bn,0= 1 n ∂2F ∂t0∂tn , b−n,0= 1 n ∂2F ∂t0∂t−n , n≥1 bm,n=− 1 mn ∂2F ∂tm∂tn b−m,−n=− 1 mn ∂2F ∂t−m∂t−n , n,m≥1 b−m,n=bn,−m=− 1 mn ∂2F ∂t−m∂tn , n,m≥1.
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final • The equation (22) =⇒ map to n-th Faber polynomial (in certain basis)! The Grunsky coefficients can be identified as bnm = 1/nm(∂nvm) and can be represented in terms of tau-function ( F = log τdToda)! Tau-function and Grunsky coefficients The Grunsky coefficients bnm of the pair (g = w(L), f = w( ¯L)) are related to the tau function, or fee energy as follows: b00=−∂2F ∂t2 0 , bn,0= 1 n ∂2F ∂t0∂tn , b−n,0= 1 n ∂2F ∂t0∂t−n , n≥1 bm,n=− 1 mn ∂2F ∂tm∂tn b−m,−n=− 1 mn ∂2F ∂t−m∂t−n , n,m≥1 b−m,n=bn,−m=− 1 mn ∂2F ∂t−m∂tn , n,m≥1. • The entanglement entropy takes the form Svac−Sex= c 12 log 1+(z−w)2 m,n ∂2F ∂tm∂tn zm−1wn−1 .
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final The tau-function The structures appeared so far - SL(2) projective invariants (Schwarzian, Aharonov invariants);
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final The tau-function The structures appeared so far - SL(2) projective invariants (Schwarzian, Aharonov invariants); • Next issue: generalization to higher invariants; - Starting point is again the expression: Wm∂m h (j) 0 (x; t) = (∂m + w1(x; t)∂m−1 + · · · + wm(x; t)) h (j) 0 (x; t) = 0, j = 1, 2, . . . , m. (23) One can find the expressions for wj(x; t) as wj(x; t) = h (1) m−1 · · · −h (1) m · · · h (1) 0 ... · · · ... · · · ... h (m) m−1 · · · −h (m) m · · · h (m) 0 h (1) m−1 · · · h (1) m−j · · · h (1) 0 ... · · · ... · · · ... h (m) m−1 · · · h (m) m−j · · · h (m) 0 . (24)
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final • As usually, the standard independent solutions f(i) to (23) have been generalized to include ”times” {t1, t2, . . . } ⇒ h (j) i (x; t).
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final • As usually, the standard independent solutions f(i) to (23) have been generalized to include ”times” {t1, t2, . . . } ⇒ h (j) i (x; t). • The latter solutions, h (j) i are used to fedine the τ-function, τ(x; t) = h (1) 0 · · · h (m) 0 h (1) 1 · · · h (m) 1 ... · · · ... h (1) m−1 · · · h (m) m−1. (25) where h (j) 0 (x; 0) = f(j) (x), (26) and one can think of h (j) n (x; t) as defined by h(j) n (x; t) = ∂h (j) 0 (x; t) ∂tn = ∂n h (j) 0 (x; t) ∂xn . (27)
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final • As usually, the standard independent solutions f(i) to (23) have been generalized to include ”times” {t1, t2, . . . } ⇒ h (j) i (x; t). • The latter solutions, h (j) i are used to fedine the τ-function, τ(x; t) = h (1) 0 · · · h (m) 0 h (1) 1 · · · h (m) 1 ... · · · ... h (1) m−1 · · · h (m) m−1. (25) where h (j) 0 (x; 0) = f(j) (x), (26) and one can think of h (j) n (x; t) as defined by h(j) n (x; t) = ∂h (j) 0 (x; t) ∂tn = ∂n h (j) 0 (x; t) ∂xn . (27) • Relations to wj wj = (−1)j 1 τ S (˜∂t)τ. (28)
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final The projective invariants associated to the ordinary differ- ential equation y(n) + pn−2(z)y(n−2) + · · · + p0(z)y = 0, (29) are given by pi ≡ qi = 1 Wn n √ Wn   n−1 j=0 (−1)2n−j (1 − δnj) n − j n − j − i .Wn−j n Wn (n−j−i) , (30) for i = 0, 1, . . . , n − 2.
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Here: ˜Wi = f1 f2 · · · fn−1 ... ... ... ... f (i−1) 1 f (i−1) 2 · · · f (i−1) n f (i+1) 1 f (i+1) 2 · · · f (i+1) n ... ... ... ... f (n) 1 f (n) 2 · · · f (n) n−1 , Wi = (−1)n+i ˜W. (31) Examle: Let us apply formula (21) to the n = 2 case - we have only one invariant, namely p0 which is given by p0 = 1 W2 √ W2 W2 W2 − W1 W2 = 1 2 f f − 2 3 f 2 f 2 ≡ 1 2 {f, z}. (32)
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final • For completeness, here are the invariants in the case of n = 3. This case corresponds to the third order equation y + p1(z)y + p0(z)y = 0. (33) The formula (21) gives p0 = − 1 3 2 9 f1f2 − f1 f2 f1f2 − f1 f2 3 − f1f2 − f1 f2 f1f2 − f1 f2 − f1f2 − f1 f2 f1f2 − f1 f2 f1 f2 − f1 f2 f1f2 − f1 f2 , (34) p1 = f1 f2 − f1 f2 f1f2 − f1 f2 + f1f2 − f1 f2 f1f2 − f1 f2 − 1 3 f1f2 − f1 f2 f1f2 − f1 f2 2 , or p0 = 1 3 ω1ω2 − ω2 − 2 9 ω3 2 , p1 = ω1 + ω2 − 1 3 ω2 2. where ω1 = W1 W3 = f1 f2 − f1 f2 f1f2 − f1 f2 , ω2 = W2 W3 = f1f2 − f1 f2 f1f2 − f1 f2
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Higher spin 3d gravity
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Higher spin 3d gravity • From SL(2) formulation to SL(n) - define the connections as A = (aa µTa + aa1...as µ Ta1...as )dxµ ¯A = (¯aa µTa + ¯aa1...as µ Ta1...as )dxµ . The zweibeins and spin connections eµ = 1 2 (Aµ − ¯Aµ), ωµ = 1 2 (Aµ + ¯Aµ).
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Higher spin 3d gravity • From SL(2) formulation to SL(n) - define the connections as A = (aa µTa + aa1...as µ Ta1...as )dxµ ¯A = (¯aa µTa + ¯aa1...as µ Ta1...as )dxµ . The zweibeins and spin connections eµ = 1 2 (Aµ − ¯Aµ), ωµ = 1 2 (Aµ + ¯Aµ). • The action Sgrav = SCS[A] − SCS[ ¯A]
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Higher spin 3d gravity • From SL(2) formulation to SL(n) - define the connections as A = (aa µTa + aa1...as µ Ta1...as )dxµ ¯A = (¯aa µTa + ¯aa1...as µ Ta1...as )dxµ . The zweibeins and spin connections eµ = 1 2 (Aµ − ¯Aµ), ωµ = 1 2 (Aµ + ¯Aµ). • The action Sgrav = SCS[A] − SCS[ ¯A] + Sbdy.
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Higher spin 3d gravity • From SL(2) formulation to SL(n) - define the connections as A = (aa µTa + aa1...as µ Ta1...as )dxµ ¯A = (¯aa µTa + ¯aa1...as µ Ta1...as )dxµ . The zweibeins and spin connections eµ = 1 2 (Aµ − ¯Aµ), ωµ = 1 2 (Aµ + ¯Aµ). • The action Sgrav = SCS[A] − SCS[ ¯A] + Sbdy. • One can apply all the technology we developed so far to this case!
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Higher spin 3d gravity • From SL(2) formulation to SL(n) - define the connections as A = (aa µTa + aa1...as µ Ta1...as )dxµ ¯A = (¯aa µTa + ¯aa1...as µ Ta1...as )dxµ . The zweibeins and spin connections eµ = 1 2 (Aµ − ¯Aµ), ωµ = 1 2 (Aµ + ¯Aµ). • The action Sgrav = SCS[A] − SCS[ ¯A] + Sbdy. • One can apply all the technology we developed so far to this case! • Go to the main goal - bulk reconstruction!
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final The setup: radial evolution • Consider Lorentzian d + 1 dimensionsl manifold (M, g) which is solution of the Einstein equation. Definition: The manifold (M, g) is called conformally compact if ∃ a defining function ρ−1 (0) = ∂M, ∂ρ = 0 on ∂M, (35) & the conf. equiv. metric 2 ¯g = ρ2 g extends smoothly on ∂M. • Let ∂M = Σ. At some ρ we have Σρ fro which we have n = ∂r = − ρ ∂ρ, Kν µ = γνα αnµ = 1 2 γνα Lvgαµ γµν = gµν − εnµnν, ε = n2 , n ⊥ Σρ. (36) • Radial evolution ∂rΨ(γρ) = Σρ ∂rγij δΨ δγij ∼ ρ=0 2 Σρ γij δΨ δγij , (37) where the last operator is just the operator of conformal scaling. This means that the radial evolution is intimately related to the conformal rescaling.
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Ward identities and Wheeler-deWitt equation
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Ward identities and Wheeler-deWitt equation • Gauge invariance (2d) HvΨ(A) ≡ Σ vAa + π k δ δA a ¯∂Aa − π k ∂ δ δA a Ψ(A) = 0.
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Ward identities and Wheeler-deWitt equation • Gauge invariance (2d) HvΨ(A) ≡ Σ vAa + π k δ δA a ¯∂Aa − π k ∂ δ δA a Ψ(A) = 0. • Diffeomorphisms with parameters (v, ¯v) (as a Hamiltonian constraint) are generated by (2d) HvΨ(A) ≡ Σρ vAa + π k δ δA a ¯∂Aa − π k ∂ δ δA a Ψ(A) = 0.
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Ward identities and Wheeler-deWitt equation • Gauge invariance (2d) HvΨ(A) ≡ Σ vAa + π k δ δA a ¯∂Aa − π k ∂ δ δA a Ψ(A) = 0. • Diffeomorphisms with parameters (v, ¯v) (as a Hamiltonian constraint) are generated by (2d) HvΨ(A) ≡ Σρ vAa + π k δ δA a ¯∂Aa − π k ∂ δ δA a Ψ(A) = 0. • Make Fourier-Laplace transformation: Ψ(µ) = DAΨ(A)χµ(A), χµ = e− k 2π µ tr A2 . (38)
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Ward identities and Wheeler-deWitt equation • Gauge invariance (2d) HvΨ(A) ≡ Σ vAa + π k δ δA a ¯∂Aa − π k ∂ δ δA a Ψ(A) = 0. • Diffeomorphisms with parameters (v, ¯v) (as a Hamiltonian constraint) are generated by (2d) HvΨ(A) ≡ Σρ vAa + π k δ δA a ¯∂Aa − π k ∂ δ δA a Ψ(A) = 0. • Make Fourier-Laplace transformation: Ψ(µ) = DAΨ(A)χµ(A), χµ = e− k 2π µ tr A2 . (38) • The Hv constraint in µ-representation =⇒ Ward Identity HvΨ(A) = 0 ⇒ Σρ (v + µ¯v) ¯∂ − µ∂ − 2∂µ δ δµ(z) Ψ(A) = − c 12π Σρ d2 z(v + µ¯v)∂3 µΨ(A),
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Wheeler-deWitt equation and Ward Identity • Define for 3d gravity case the conjugate Πab = 2 √ γ δ δγab , Π = πa a, • Diffeo’s Hb = aΠa b . • The Hamiltonian constraint (geometry idependence, AdS case) H = κ2 : Πab Πcd Gabcd − Π2 d − 1 : +R(γ) + d(d − 1) l2 ,
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Wheeler-deWitt equation and Ward Identity • Define for 3d gravity case the conjugate Πab = 2 √ γ δ δγab , Π = πa a, • Diffeo’s Hb = aΠa b . • The Hamiltonian constraint (geometry idependence, AdS case) H = κ2 : Πab Πcd Gabcd − Π2 d − 1 : +R(γ) + d(d − 1) l2 , implies ”Wheeler-deWitt equation! HΨ = 0.
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Wheeler-deWitt equation and Ward Identity
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Wheeler-deWitt equation and Ward Identity • On the other hand Ψ ≡ Ψ[A] = DµΨ(µ)χµ(−A). Therefore, 3d functionsl Ψ[A] satisfies Wheeler-deWitt equation providing µ fulfills 2d Ward Identity!
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Wheeler-deWitt equation and Ward Identity • On the other hand Ψ ≡ Ψ[A] = DµΨ(µ)χµ(−A). Therefore, 3d functionsl Ψ[A] satisfies Wheeler-deWitt equation providing µ fulfills 2d Ward Identity! • The last statement provides direct proof of the holography in this particular case!
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Wheeler-deWitt equation and Ward Identity • On the other hand Ψ ≡ Ψ[A] = DµΨ(µ)χµ(−A). Therefore, 3d functionsl Ψ[A] satisfies Wheeler-deWitt equation providing µ fulfills 2d Ward Identity! • The last statement provides direct proof of the holography in this particular case! • The projective invariants provide bases for W-geometries and higher spin theories!
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Wheeler-deWitt equation and Ward Identity • On the other hand Ψ ≡ Ψ[A] = DµΨ(µ)χµ(−A). Therefore, 3d functionsl Ψ[A] satisfies Wheeler-deWitt equation providing µ fulfills 2d Ward Identity! • The last statement provides direct proof of the holography in this particular case! • The projective invariants provide bases for W-geometries and higher spin theories! • For n = 3 (W3 case) the action in terms of invariants L ∼ q0 ¯q0 + q1 ¯q1.
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Wheeler-deWitt equation and Ward Identity • On the other hand Ψ ≡ Ψ[A] = DµΨ(µ)χµ(−A). Therefore, 3d functionsl Ψ[A] satisfies Wheeler-deWitt equation providing µ fulfills 2d Ward Identity! • The last statement provides direct proof of the holography in this particular case! • The projective invariants provide bases for W-geometries and higher spin theories! • For n = 3 (W3 case) the action in terms of invariants L ∼ q0 ¯q0 + q1 ¯q1. • For general n (Wn case) L ∼ i coeffi tr qi ¯qj + · · · .
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final A sketch of relation to SYK • The Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev (SYK) model describes interacting Majorana fermions with random (gaussian) coupling S = i 2 dt   N α=1 ψα ∂ψα − iq α1...αq Jα1...αq ψα1 . . . ψαq ,   where Jα1...αq Jβ1...βq = J2 (q − 1) Nq−1 q i δαiβi . • SYK model addresses many interesting issues as properties of non-Fermi liquid behavior, quantum chaos, emergent conformal symmetry and holographic duality. SYK model can be used to describe black holes (BHs) in 2d nearly-Anti-de-Sitter gravity. • The effective action is just the Schwarzian SSch = −C td{f, t}, {f, t} = f f − 3 2 f f 2 .
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final • 2d generalization suggested in 1701.00528 (G. Turiaci, H, Verlinde), leading to double Schwarzian theory in the UV (in light-cone) SUV ∼ du dv{x+, u}{x−, v}.
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final • 2d generalization suggested in 1701.00528 (G. Turiaci, H, Verlinde), leading to double Schwarzian theory in the UV (in light-cone) SUV ∼ du dv{x+, u}{x−, v}. • Using Lagrange multipliers ⇐⇒ SUV ∼ du dv e+ v {x+, u} + e+ u {x+, v} − µν e+ µ e− ν .
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final • 2d generalization suggested in 1701.00528 (G. Turiaci, H, Verlinde), leading to double Schwarzian theory in the UV (in light-cone) SUV ∼ du dv{x+, u}{x−, v}. • Using Lagrange multipliers ⇐⇒ SUV ∼ du dv e+ v {x+, u} + e+ u {x+, v} − µν e+ µ e− ν . • Relations between double Schwarzian & Polyakov-Liouville actions (L ∼ p0 ¯p0 in our case) - in 1701.00528 (G. Turiaci, H, Verlinde) Sgrav[E] = min e SL(E + e) − µν e+ µ e− ν .
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final • Using the same logic as in the SL(2) case, for n=3 we propose the higher spin SYK 2D theory by the lagrangian density L ∼ 1 3 ω1ω2 − ω2 − 2 9 ω3 2 . 1 3 ω1ω2 − ω2 − 2 9 ω3 2 + (ω1 + ω2 − 1 3 ω2 2)(ω1 + ω2 − 1 3 ω2 2). (39) - some other reductions of 2D → 1D are discussed in 1705.08408 (T. Mertens, G. Turiaci and H. Verlinde).
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final • Using the same logic as in the SL(2) case, for n=3 we propose the higher spin SYK 2D theory by the lagrangian density L ∼ 1 3 ω1ω2 − ω2 − 2 9 ω3 2 . 1 3 ω1ω2 − ω2 − 2 9 ω3 2 + (ω1 + ω2 − 1 3 ω2 2)(ω1 + ω2 − 1 3 ω2 2). (39) - some other reductions of 2D → 1D are discussed in 1705.08408 (T. Mertens, G. Turiaci and H. Verlinde). • We generalize the above picture to arbitrary higher spin theories by making use of W-geometry and jet bundles!
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Summary • Putting all these considerations together, one can draw the following conclusions:
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Summary • Putting all these considerations together, one can draw the following conclusions: We found that the following quantities are related by appropriate tau-functions: - entanglement entropy and Aharonov invariants; - Higher spin gravities; - higher projective invariants.
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Summary • Putting all these considerations together, one can draw the following conclusions: We found that the following quantities are related by appropriate tau-functions: - entanglement entropy and Aharonov invariants; - Higher spin gravities; - higher projective invariants. The basis for W-geometries are related to tau-functions
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Summary • Putting all these considerations together, one can draw the following conclusions: We found that the following quantities are related by appropriate tau-functions: - entanglement entropy and Aharonov invariants; - Higher spin gravities; - higher projective invariants. The basis for W-geometries are related to tau-functions We propose a generalization of the relations between SYK (Schwarzian) model, integrable 2d CFT and 3d Gravity
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Summary • Putting all these considerations together, one can draw the following conclusions: We found that the following quantities are related by appropriate tau-functions: - entanglement entropy and Aharonov invariants; - Higher spin gravities; - higher projective invariants. The basis for W-geometries are related to tau-functions We propose a generalization of the relations between SYK (Schwarzian) model, integrable 2d CFT and 3d Gravity We suggest that all these have geometric description in terms of W-geometries;
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Summary • Putting all these considerations together, one can draw the following conclusions: We found that the following quantities are related by appropriate tau-functions: - entanglement entropy and Aharonov invariants; - Higher spin gravities; - higher projective invariants. The basis for W-geometries are related to tau-functions We propose a generalization of the relations between SYK (Schwarzian) model, integrable 2d CFT and 3d Gravity We suggest that all these have geometric description in terms of W-geometries; We give arguments that entanglement entropies in low-dimensionnal holography is intimately related to Toda theory.
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final • Future directions
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final • Future directions Generalization of HS projective actions for 1d and 2d theories
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final • Future directions Generalization of HS projective actions for 1d and 2d theories Reconstruction of bulk theories
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final • Future directions Generalization of HS projective actions for 1d and 2d theories Reconstruction of bulk theories Localization for 1-loop exact partition function - Stanford-Witten, 1703.04612 Z = dµ[φ] SL(2, R) exp  − 1 2g2 2π 0 dτ φ 2 φ 2 − φ 2  
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final • Future directions Generalization of HS projective actions for 1d and 2d theories Reconstruction of bulk theories Localization for 1-loop exact partition function - Stanford-Witten, 1703.04612 Z = dµ[φ] SL(2, R) exp  − 1 2g2 2π 0 dτ φ 2 φ 2 − φ 2   Generalization for 4d/3d holography
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final • Future directions Generalization of HS projective actions for 1d and 2d theories Reconstruction of bulk theories Localization for 1-loop exact partition function - Stanford-Witten, 1703.04612 Z = dµ[φ] SL(2, R) exp  − 1 2g2 2π 0 dτ φ 2 φ 2 − φ 2   Generalization for 4d/3d holography Study wide variety of physical consequences
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final • Future directions Generalization of HS projective actions for 1d and 2d theories Reconstruction of bulk theories Localization for 1-loop exact partition function - Stanford-Witten, 1703.04612 Z = dµ[φ] SL(2, R) exp  − 1 2g2 2π 0 dτ φ 2 φ 2 − φ 2   Generalization for 4d/3d holography Study wide variety of physical consequences Generalizations of T ¯T deformations and Ban˜ados metric?
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final • Future directions Generalization of HS projective actions for 1d and 2d theories Reconstruction of bulk theories Localization for 1-loop exact partition function - Stanford-Witten, 1703.04612 Z = dµ[φ] SL(2, R) exp  − 1 2g2 2π 0 dτ φ 2 φ 2 − φ 2   Generalization for 4d/3d holography Study wide variety of physical consequences Generalizations of T ¯T deformations and Ban˜ados metric? . . . and much more . . .
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final 15 years SEENET - Congratulations!
Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final 15 years SEENET - Congratulations! T H A N K Y O U!

More Related Content

PPTX
Sci 116: Relativity
byprofbruckner
 
PPTX
Introduction to the General Theory of Relativity
byArpan Saha
 
PDF
破解人类智能之谜，统一爱因斯坦广义相对论，利用人工智能新突破，引领新高科技产业
byJeffrey Huang
 
PDF
Galaxy Rotation Problem
byJohn Huenefeld
 
PPTX
Gravity Duals of Nontrivial IR Behaviour in Field Theories
byArpan Saha
 
PPTX
Relativity by Albert einstein
byJohn Rovy LuCena
 
PDF
Geneva Emergence in Gauge/Gravity Dualities
bySebastian De Haro
 
PPTX
Relativity theory project & albert einsten
bySeergio Garcia
 
Sci 116: Relativity
byprofbruckner
 
Introduction to the General Theory of Relativity
byArpan Saha
 
破解人类智能之谜，统一爱因斯坦广义相对论，利用人工智能新突破，引领新高科技产业
byJeffrey Huang
 
Galaxy Rotation Problem
byJohn Huenefeld
 
Gravity Duals of Nontrivial IR Behaviour in Field Theories
byArpan Saha
 
Relativity by Albert einstein
byJohn Rovy LuCena
 
Geneva Emergence in Gauge/Gravity Dualities
bySebastian De Haro
 
Relativity theory project & albert einsten
bySeergio Garcia
 

What's hot

PDF
Motions for systems and structures in space, described by a set denoted Avd. ...
byPremier Publishers
 
PPTX
General theory of relativity
byAna Alvarez Roldan
 
PDF
Princeton conference Equivalent Theories in Physics and Metaphysics
bySebastian De Haro
 
PPT
Relativity in a nutshell
byakhandel
 
PPTX
B.Tech sem I Engineering Physics U-III Chapter 1-THE SPECIAL THEORY OF RELATI...
byAbhi Hirpara
 
PPT
Special Relativity
bypraveens
 
PDF
Relativity
byRajendra Singh
 
PPTX
B.tech sem i engineering physics u iii chapter 1-the special theory of relati...
byRai University
 
PDF
antigravity free energy
byJohn Hutchison
 
PPTX
M.gomu,e.esakki,m.dt
byrageshthedon
 
Motions for systems and structures in space, described by a set denoted Avd. ...
byPremier Publishers
 
General theory of relativity
byAna Alvarez Roldan
 
Princeton conference Equivalent Theories in Physics and Metaphysics
bySebastian De Haro
 
Relativity in a nutshell
byakhandel
 
B.Tech sem I Engineering Physics U-III Chapter 1-THE SPECIAL THEORY OF RELATI...
byAbhi Hirpara
 
Special Relativity
bypraveens
 
Relativity
byRajendra Singh
 
B.tech sem i engineering physics u iii chapter 1-the special theory of relati...
byRai University
 
antigravity free energy
byJohn Hutchison
 
M.gomu,e.esakki,m.dt
byrageshthedon
 

Similar to Radoslav Rashkov "Integrable structures in low-dimensional holography and cosmologies"

PDF
London A Holographic Universe?
bySebastian De Haro
 
PDF
Berlin Slides Dualities and Emergence of Space-Time and Gravity
bySebastian De Haro
 
PDF
Reduction and Emergence in Holographic Scenarios
bySebastian De Haro
 
PDF
Florence Duality Talk: Reduction and Emergence in Holographic Scenarios for G...
bySebastian De Haro
 
PPT
Quantum Black Holes at OSU. HOLOGRAPHY, DIFFEOMORHISMS, AND THE CMB
bymendelejew
 
PPTX
Quantum Gravity
byAdam Getchell
 
PDF
Oxford slides on Duality and Emergence
bySebastian De Haro
 
PDF
Ecl17
byBaurzhan Alzhanov
 
PDF
Berlin - Conceptual Aspects of Gauge-Gravity Duality
bySebastian De Haro
 
PDF
Dualitiy in Contemporary Mathematics Wuppertal
bySebastian De Haro
 
London A Holographic Universe?
bySebastian De Haro
 
Berlin Slides Dualities and Emergence of Space-Time and Gravity
bySebastian De Haro
 
Reduction and Emergence in Holographic Scenarios
bySebastian De Haro
 
Florence Duality Talk: Reduction and Emergence in Holographic Scenarios for G...
bySebastian De Haro
 
Quantum Black Holes at OSU. HOLOGRAPHY, DIFFEOMORHISMS, AND THE CMB
bymendelejew
 
Quantum Gravity
byAdam Getchell
 
Oxford slides on Duality and Emergence
bySebastian De Haro
 
Ecl17
byBaurzhan Alzhanov
 
Berlin - Conceptual Aspects of Gauge-Gravity Duality
bySebastian De Haro
 
Dualitiy in Contemporary Mathematics Wuppertal
bySebastian De Haro
 

More from SEENET-MTP

PDF
SEENET-MTP Booklet - 15 years
bySEENET-MTP
 
PDF
Milan Milošević "The shape of Fe Kα line emitted from relativistic accretion ...
bySEENET-MTP
 
PDF
Ivan Dimitrijević "Nonlocal cosmology"
bySEENET-MTP
 
PDF
Dragoljub Dimitrijević "Tachyon Inflation in the RSII Framework"
bySEENET-MTP
 
PDF
Vesna Borka Jovanović "Constraining Scalar-Tensor gravity models by S2 star o...
bySEENET-MTP
 
PDF
Elena Mirela Babalic "Generalized alpha-attractor models for hyperbolic surfa...
bySEENET-MTP
 
PDF
Dragan Huterer "Novi pogledi na svemir"
bySEENET-MTP
 
PDF
Mihai Visinescu "Action-angle variables for geodesic motion on resolved metri...
bySEENET-MTP
 
PDF
Sabin Stoica "Double beta decay and neutrino properties"
bySEENET-MTP
 
PDF
Yurri Sitenko "Boundary effects for magnetized quantum matter in particle and...
bySEENET-MTP
 
PDF
Predrag Milenović "Physics potential of HE/HL-LHC and future circular"
bySEENET-MTP
 
PDF
Marija Dimitrijević Ćirić "Matter Fields in SO(2,3)⋆ Model of Noncommutative ...
bySEENET-MTP
 
PDF
Zvonimir Vlah "Lagrangian perturbation theory for large scale structure forma...
bySEENET-MTP
 
PDF
Vitaly Vanchurin "General relativity from non-equilibrium thermodynamics of q...
bySEENET-MTP
 
PDF
Sergey Sibiryakov "Galactic rotation curves vs. ultra-light dark matter: Impl...
bySEENET-MTP
 
PDF
Nikola Godinović "The very high energy gamma ray astronomy"
bySEENET-MTP
 
PDF
Miroljub Dugić "The concept of Local Time. Quantum-mechanical and cosmologica...
bySEENET-MTP
 
PDF
Cemsinan Deliduman "Astrophysics with Weyl Gravity"
bySEENET-MTP
 
PDF
Radu Constantinescu "Scientific research: Excellence in International context"
bySEENET-MTP
 
PDF
Loriano Bonora "HS theories from effective actions"
bySEENET-MTP
 
SEENET-MTP Booklet - 15 years
bySEENET-MTP
 
Milan Milošević "The shape of Fe Kα line emitted from relativistic accretion ...
bySEENET-MTP
 
Ivan Dimitrijević "Nonlocal cosmology"
bySEENET-MTP
 
Dragoljub Dimitrijević "Tachyon Inflation in the RSII Framework"
bySEENET-MTP
 
Vesna Borka Jovanović "Constraining Scalar-Tensor gravity models by S2 star o...
bySEENET-MTP
 
Elena Mirela Babalic "Generalized alpha-attractor models for hyperbolic surfa...
bySEENET-MTP
 
Dragan Huterer "Novi pogledi na svemir"
bySEENET-MTP
 
Mihai Visinescu "Action-angle variables for geodesic motion on resolved metri...
bySEENET-MTP
 
Sabin Stoica "Double beta decay and neutrino properties"
bySEENET-MTP
 
Yurri Sitenko "Boundary effects for magnetized quantum matter in particle and...
bySEENET-MTP
 
Predrag Milenović "Physics potential of HE/HL-LHC and future circular"
bySEENET-MTP
 
Marija Dimitrijević Ćirić "Matter Fields in SO(2,3)⋆ Model of Noncommutative ...
bySEENET-MTP
 
Zvonimir Vlah "Lagrangian perturbation theory for large scale structure forma...
bySEENET-MTP
 
Vitaly Vanchurin "General relativity from non-equilibrium thermodynamics of q...
bySEENET-MTP
 
Sergey Sibiryakov "Galactic rotation curves vs. ultra-light dark matter: Impl...
bySEENET-MTP
 
Nikola Godinović "The very high energy gamma ray astronomy"
bySEENET-MTP
 
Miroljub Dugić "The concept of Local Time. Quantum-mechanical and cosmologica...
bySEENET-MTP
 
Cemsinan Deliduman "Astrophysics with Weyl Gravity"
bySEENET-MTP
 
Radu Constantinescu "Scientific research: Excellence in International context"
bySEENET-MTP
 
Loriano Bonora "HS theories from effective actions"
bySEENET-MTP
 

Recently uploaded

PPTX
MOLECULAR BASIS OF INHERITANCE THIS ISAA
bybaltazarbalty032
 
PDF
TheFirstTripleRadioActiveGalacticNucleus inanOngoingGalaxyMerger
bySérgio Sacani
 
PDF
BARNARD’S MYSTERIOUS STAR NEAR VENUS: A STRANGE INTERLOPER NOTED DURING A SAT...
bySérgio Sacani
 
PPSX
New Drug Application NDA.pptx Bachelor of Pharmacy
byrajprasadsatapathy92
 
PPTX
Diseases of Cotton in India(Major disesaes).pptx
bydjarial06
 
PDF
Introduction to Bayesian methods and Bayesian Neural Networks
byTomasz Kusmierczyk
 
PDF
Primordial Black Holes as Seeds for Extremely Overmassive AGN Observed by JWST
bySérgio Sacani
 
PDF
Two views of a rogue planet - saturn size rogue planet
bySérgio Sacani
 
PDF
A free- floating- planet microlensing event caused by a Saturn- mass object
bySérgio Sacani
 
PPTX
BANCO DE PALABRAS 2 INGLES BASICO 2.pptx
byGeraldineVasquezarce
 
DOCX
biology investigatory project gene therapy
bymidhungani
 
PDF
Directional Searching for Light Dark Matter with Quantum Sensors
bySérgio Sacani
 
PPTX
lecture 2. classification of reptiles pptx
byAHMEDAZHARI8
 
PDF
Lake Stars as an Earth Analog for Europa’s Manannán Crater Spider Feature
bySérgio Sacani
 
PDF
The First Star-by-star 𝑁-body/Hydrodynamics Simulation of Our Galaxy Coupling...
bySérgio Sacani
 
PPTX
Dengue infection by Krutika Gulvi.pptx microbiology department Maharashtra
byKrutika Gulvi
 
PPTX
Cancer Biology (Introduction, features of cancer cells, properties of tumor c...
byRashmiMG2
 
PDF
HubbleRevealsComplexMultiscaleStructureintheEdge-onProtoplanetaryDisk IRAS230...
bySérgio Sacani
 
PDF
FormationoftheLittleRedDotsfromtheCoreCollapseofSelf-interactingDarkMatter Halos
bySérgio Sacani
 
PPTX
CHROMOSOME MUTATION: CHROMOSOME REARRANGEMENT, ANEUPLOIDY AND POLYPLOIDY
byBIOSPHERE OF KNOWLEDGE
 
MOLECULAR BASIS OF INHERITANCE THIS ISAA
bybaltazarbalty032
 
TheFirstTripleRadioActiveGalacticNucleus inanOngoingGalaxyMerger
bySérgio Sacani
 
BARNARD’S MYSTERIOUS STAR NEAR VENUS: A STRANGE INTERLOPER NOTED DURING A SAT...
bySérgio Sacani
 
New Drug Application NDA.pptx Bachelor of Pharmacy
byrajprasadsatapathy92
 
Diseases of Cotton in India(Major disesaes).pptx
bydjarial06
 
Introduction to Bayesian methods and Bayesian Neural Networks
byTomasz Kusmierczyk
 
Primordial Black Holes as Seeds for Extremely Overmassive AGN Observed by JWST
bySérgio Sacani
 
Two views of a rogue planet - saturn size rogue planet
bySérgio Sacani
 
A free- floating- planet microlensing event caused by a Saturn- mass object
bySérgio Sacani
 
BANCO DE PALABRAS 2 INGLES BASICO 2.pptx
byGeraldineVasquezarce
 
biology investigatory project gene therapy
bymidhungani
 
Directional Searching for Light Dark Matter with Quantum Sensors
bySérgio Sacani
 
lecture 2. classification of reptiles pptx
byAHMEDAZHARI8
 
Lake Stars as an Earth Analog for Europa’s Manannán Crater Spider Feature
bySérgio Sacani
 
The First Star-by-star 𝑁-body/Hydrodynamics Simulation of Our Galaxy Coupling...
bySérgio Sacani
 
Dengue infection by Krutika Gulvi.pptx microbiology department Maharashtra
byKrutika Gulvi
 
Cancer Biology (Introduction, features of cancer cells, properties of tumor c...
byRashmiMG2
 
HubbleRevealsComplexMultiscaleStructureintheEdge-onProtoplanetaryDisk IRAS230...
bySérgio Sacani
 
FormationoftheLittleRedDotsfromtheCoreCollapseofSelf-interactingDarkMatter Halos
bySérgio Sacani
 
CHROMOSOME MUTATION: CHROMOSOME REARRANGEMENT, ANEUPLOIDY AND POLYPLOIDY
byBIOSPHERE OF KNOWLEDGE
 

Radoslav Rashkov "Integrable structures in low-dimensional holography and cosmologies"

  • 1.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov † Department of Physics, Sofia University, † ITP, Vienna University of Technology Field Theory and the Early Universe – BW2018, Nis, Serbia, 10-14 June, 2018 ——————– This project was partially supported by BNSF grant DN 18/1, SU Research Fund grants 85/2018, ??/2018, NORDITA Program ”Correlation functions and solvable models” and SEENET-TMP.
  • 2.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Content:
  • 3.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Content: Motivation
  • 4.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Content: Motivation Holographic Entanglement Entropy (EE) of excited states and theit representations
  • 5.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Content: Motivation Holographic Entanglement Entropy (EE) of excited states and theit representations Integrable structures in Low-dimesional Holography
  • 6.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Content: Motivation Holographic Entanglement Entropy (EE) of excited states and theit representations Integrable structures in Low-dimesional Holography Higher spin theories, higher projective invariants and W-geometry
  • 7.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Content: Motivation Holographic Entanglement Entropy (EE) of excited states and theit representations Integrable structures in Low-dimesional Holography Higher spin theories, higher projective invariants and W-geometry Bulk reconstruction and consequences
  • 8.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Content: Motivation Holographic Entanglement Entropy (EE) of excited states and theit representations Integrable structures in Low-dimesional Holography Higher spin theories, higher projective invariants and W-geometry Bulk reconstruction and consequences Conclusions
  • 9.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final String(Gravity)/Gauge theory duality • Conceptual issues:
  • 10.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final String(Gravity)/Gauge theory duality • Conceptual issues: If gravity(string) theory is dual to certain gauge theory, it should be possible to reconstruct any of them from the other!
  • 11.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final String(Gravity)/Gauge theory duality • Conceptual issues: If gravity(string) theory is dual to certain gauge theory, it should be possible to reconstruct any of them from the other! If the above statement is true, the (quantum) gravity should be encoded in the boundary theory!
  • 12.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final String(Gravity)/Gauge theory duality • Conceptual issues: If gravity(string) theory is dual to certain gauge theory, it should be possible to reconstruct any of them from the other! If the above statement is true, the (quantum) gravity should be encoded in the boundary theory! In view of the above, should we think of space-time, ergo gravity as an emergent phenomenon?
  • 13.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final String(Gravity)/Gauge theory duality • Conceptual issues: If gravity(string) theory is dual to certain gauge theory, it should be possible to reconstruct any of them from the other! If the above statement is true, the (quantum) gravity should be encoded in the boundary theory! In view of the above, should we think of space-time, ergo gravity as an emergent phenomenon? continuing · · · ?????????????????????!
  • 14.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final String(Gravity)/Gauge theory duality • Conceptual issues: If gravity(string) theory is dual to certain gauge theory, it should be possible to reconstruct any of them from the other! If the above statement is true, the (quantum) gravity should be encoded in the boundary theory! In view of the above, should we think of space-time, ergo gravity as an emergent phenomenon? continuing · · · ?????????????????????! The first questions to ask:
  • 15.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final String(Gravity)/Gauge theory duality • Conceptual issues: If gravity(string) theory is dual to certain gauge theory, it should be possible to reconstruct any of them from the other! If the above statement is true, the (quantum) gravity should be encoded in the boundary theory! In view of the above, should we think of space-time, ergo gravity as an emergent phenomenon? continuing · · · ?????????????????????! The first questions to ask: • How to match the degrees of freedom on both sides of duality ?
  • 16.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final String(Gravity)/Gauge theory duality • Conceptual issues: If gravity(string) theory is dual to certain gauge theory, it should be possible to reconstruct any of them from the other! If the above statement is true, the (quantum) gravity should be encoded in the boundary theory! In view of the above, should we think of space-time, ergo gravity as an emergent phenomenon? continuing · · · ?????????????????????! The first questions to ask: • How to match the degrees of freedom on both sides of duality ? • How exactly the information from the bulk is encoded in the boundary theory ?
  • 17.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Ryu-Takayanagi holographic entanglement Let us have a CFTin a state |Ψ defined on a spacetime geometry B. Suppose the state |Ψ is associated with the geometry of a dual theory in a space MΨ whose boundary is B.
  • 18.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Ryu-Takayanagi holographic entanglement Let us have a CFTin a state |Ψ defined on a spacetime geometry B. Suppose the state |Ψ is associated with the geometry of a dual theory in a space MΨ whose boundary is B. Let us consider a spacial subsystem A of the CFT and let SA is its entropy , i.e. it measures the entanglement of the fields in A with the rest of the system.
  • 19.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Ryu-Takayanagi holographic entanglement Let us have a CFTin a state |Ψ defined on a spacetime geometry B. Suppose the state |Ψ is associated with the geometry of a dual theory in a space MΨ whose boundary is B. Let us consider a spacial subsystem A of the CFT and let SA is its entropy , i.e. it measures the entanglement of the fields in A with the rest of the system. Thus: S(A) = 1 4GN Area( ˜A), (1)
  • 20.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Ryu-Takayanagi holographic entanglement Let us have a CFTin a state |Ψ defined on a spacetime geometry B. Suppose the state |Ψ is associated with the geometry of a dual theory in a space MΨ whose boundary is B. Let us consider a spacial subsystem A of the CFT and let SA is its entropy , i.e. it measures the entanglement of the fields in A with the rest of the system. Thus: S(A) = 1 4GN Area( ˜A), (1) • The surface ˜A is co-dimension 2 extremal surface with the same boundary as A!
  • 21.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Ryu-Takayanagi holographic entanglement Let us have a CFTin a state |Ψ defined on a spacetime geometry B. Suppose the state |Ψ is associated with the geometry of a dual theory in a space MΨ whose boundary is B. Let us consider a spacial subsystem A of the CFT and let SA is its entropy , i.e. it measures the entanglement of the fields in A with the rest of the system. Thus: S(A) = 1 4GN Area( ˜A), (1) • The surface ˜A is co-dimension 2 extremal surface with the same boundary as A! • The surface ˜A is homologous to A, where ¯A ∪ A is a boundary of d-dimensional space-like region in MΨ!
  • 22.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final When the Ryu-Takayanagi formula applies, in 2d S(u, v) is the entanglement entropy of the interval (u, v). u − dv v γ(u − du, v) γ(u, v + dv) u v + dv du dv Figure 1: The choice of intervals. 1
  • 23.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final When the Ryu-Takayanagi formula applies, in 2d S(u, v) is the entanglement entropy of the interval (u, v). u − dv v γ(u − du, v) γ(u, v + dv) u v + dv du dv Figure 1: The choice of intervals. 1 For intervals A = (u − du, u) and B = (u, v) and C = (v, v + dv), strong subadditivity leads to: S(u − du, v) + S(u, v + dv) − S(u, v) − S(u − du, v + dv) ≈ ∂2 S(u, v) ∂u∂v ≥ 0. (2)
  • 24.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final When the Ryu-Takayanagi formula applies, in 2d S(u, v) is the entanglement entropy of the interval (u, v). u − dv v γ(u − du, v) γ(u, v + dv) u v + dv du dv Figure 1: The choice of intervals. 1 For intervals A = (u − du, u) and B = (u, v) and C = (v, v + dv), strong subadditivity leads to: S(u − du, v) + S(u, v + dv) − S(u, v) − S(u − du, v + dv) ≈ ∂2 S(u, v) ∂u∂v ≥ 0. (2) • Here S(u, v) is the length of the geodesic connecting the boundary points (u, v) (on the cutoff surface).
  • 25.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final One way to compute entanglement entropy
  • 26.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final One way to compute entanglement entropy • The Renyi entropy: Using the replica trick method, the R´enyi entropy for the vacuum is given by exp((1−n)S(n) )= Φ+(z1)Φ−(z2) = 1 (z1−z2)2hn , where twist operators Φ±(z) have dimensions (hn, ¯hn) = c/24(n − 1/n, n − 1/n). The entanglement entropy: taking the limit n → 1 of S(n) Svac= lim n→1 S(n) = lim n→1 log(z1−z2)−2hn = c 12 log (z1−z2) δ2 .
  • 27.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final One way to compute entanglement entropy • The Renyi entropy: Using the replica trick method, the R´enyi entropy for the vacuum is given by exp((1−n)S(n) )= Φ+(z1)Φ−(z2) = 1 (z1−z2)2hn , where twist operators Φ±(z) have dimensions (hn, ¯hn) = c/24(n − 1/n, n − 1/n). The entanglement entropy: taking the limit n → 1 of S(n) Svac= lim n→1 S(n) = lim n→1 log(z1−z2)−2hn = c 12 log (z1−z2) δ2 . • For excited states |f =Uf |0 the calculation of the R´enyi entropy goes analogously exp((1−n)S(n) ex )=( df dz ) −hn z1 ( df dz ) −hn z2 d ¯f d¯z −¯hn ¯z1 d ¯f d¯z −¯hn ¯z2 0|Φ+(f(z1))Φ−(f(z2))|0 ,
  • 28.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final One way to compute entanglement entropy • The Renyi entropy: Using the replica trick method, the R´enyi entropy for the vacuum is given by exp((1−n)S(n) )= Φ+(z1)Φ−(z2) = 1 (z1−z2)2hn , where twist operators Φ±(z) have dimensions (hn, ¯hn) = c/24(n − 1/n, n − 1/n). The entanglement entropy: taking the limit n → 1 of S(n) Svac= lim n→1 S(n) = lim n→1 log(z1−z2)−2hn = c 12 log (z1−z2) δ2 . • For excited states |f =Uf |0 the calculation of the R´enyi entropy goes analogously exp((1−n)S(n) ex )=( df dz ) −hn z1 ( df dz ) −hn z2 d ¯f d¯z −¯hn ¯z1 d ¯f d¯z −¯hn ¯z2 0|Φ+(f(z1))Φ−(f(z2))|0 , Sex= lim n→1 S(n) ex = c 12 log f (z1)f (z2) δ2 (f(z1)−f(z2))2 . (3)
  • 29.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final A second way: Wilson line anchored at the bdy The logic of the considerations: eSEE = G(geodesic length) = Wilson line = mat. element , where the geodesic and the Wilson line end at the boundary of AdS space.
  • 30.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final A second way: Wilson line anchored at the bdy The logic of the considerations: eSEE = G(geodesic length) = Wilson line = mat. element , where the geodesic and the Wilson line end at the boundary of AdS space. The computations go as follows: Use CS formulation of 3d gravity ; Choose a convenient basis. In our case we choose L1 ∼= L−1 = ∂x; L0 ∼= L0 = x∂x+h; L−1 ∼= L1 = 1 2 x2 ∂x+hx, acting on holomorphic functions of the auxiliary variable x in representation of spin h with Az|y=0 = L1 + 12 c T(z)L−1.
  • 31.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final A second way: Wilson line anchored at the bdy The logic of the considerations: eSEE = G(geodesic length) = Wilson line = mat. element , where the geodesic and the Wilson line end at the boundary of AdS space. The computations go as follows: Use CS formulation of 3d gravity ; Choose a convenient basis. In our case we choose L1 ∼= L−1 = ∂x; L0 ∼= L0 = x∂x+h; L−1 ∼= L1 = 1 2 x2 ∂x+hx, acting on holomorphic functions of the auxiliary variable x in representation of spin h with Az|y=0 = L1 + 12 c T(z)L−1. Define a generic Wilson line in this setup Wh(zf ; zi) = dx |h P e zf zi dzAa z (z)La x x|.
  • 32.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Wilson lines, bOPE and OPE blocks: (see 1612.06385) Matrix elements of an open Wilson line with primary operators at the endpoints At general c, a Wilson line with primary endpoints can be written in the compact form h|W(zf ,zi)|h = e zf zi dz 12T (z) c xT (z) 1 xT (zi)2 h , subject to −xT (z) = 1 + 6T(z) c x2 T (z), xT (zf ) = 0, (4) where the function xT (z) is defined by this differential equation.
  • 33.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final The uniformizing w-coordinates are connected to the Wilson line 1 xT (z) = w (z) 2w (z) − w (z) w(z) + C , with bdy condition C = −w(zf ). We therefore find Conformal block in the presence of heavy state using Wilson line) h|W(zf , zi)|h = limC→−w(zf ) e −2 zf zi dz x T (z)+1 xT (z) 1 xT (zi)2 h = w (zf )w (zi) (w(zf )−w(zi))2 h , exactly reproducing the vacuum Virasoro block for an arbitrary heavy background . - In the case of Higher spin theories an approach based on skew-tau functions has been used, see 1602.06233.
  • 34.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final • The entanglement entropy is given by Sex = lim n→1 S(n) ex = c 12 log f (z1)f (z2) δ2 (f(z1) − f(z2))2 . (5)
  • 35.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final • The entanglement entropy is given by Sex = lim n→1 S(n) ex = c 12 log f (z1)f (z2) δ2 (f(z1) − f(z2))2 . (5) • The difference between vacuum entanglement and that of excited states is Svac−Sex= c 12 log f (z1)f (z2) ¯f ( ¯z1) ¯f ( ¯z2)(z1−z2)2 (f(z1)−f(z2)2( ¯f(¯z1)− ¯f(¯z2))2
  • 36.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final • The entanglement entropy is given by Sex = lim n→1 S(n) ex = c 12 log f (z1)f (z2) δ2 (f(z1) − f(z2))2 . (5) • The difference between vacuum entanglement and that of excited states is Svac−Sex= c 12 log f (z1)f (z2) ¯f ( ¯z1) ¯f ( ¯z2)(z1−z2)2 (f(z1)−f(z2)2( ¯f(¯z1)− ¯f(¯z2))2 • Direct calculations show that (f (z) = 0) the expansion about z is f (z)f (w) (f(z) − f(w))2 = 1 (z − w)2 + 1 6 S(f)(z)
  • 37.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final • The entanglement entropy is given by Sex = lim n→1 S(n) ex = c 12 log f (z1)f (z2) δ2 (f(z1) − f(z2))2 . (5) • The difference between vacuum entanglement and that of excited states is Svac−Sex= c 12 log f (z1)f (z2) ¯f ( ¯z1) ¯f ( ¯z2)(z1−z2)2 (f(z1)−f(z2)2( ¯f(¯z1)− ¯f(¯z2))2 • Direct calculations show that (f (z) = 0) the expansion about z is f (z)f (w) (f(z) − f(w))2 = 1 (z − w)2 + 1 6 S(f)(z)+ 1 12 S (f)(z)(z − w) + · · · (6) where S(f) denotes the Schwarzian derivative. Some (very incomplete list of) references: hep-th/9403108, hep-th/0405152, 1604.05308,1604.03110, 1606.03307
  • 38.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final • The entanglement entropy is given by Sex = lim n→1 S(n) ex = c 12 log f (z1)f (z2) δ2 (f(z1) − f(z2))2 . (5) • The difference between vacuum entanglement and that of excited states is Svac−Sex= c 12 log f (z1)f (z2) ¯f ( ¯z1) ¯f ( ¯z2)(z1−z2)2 (f(z1)−f(z2)2( ¯f(¯z1)− ¯f(¯z2))2 • Direct calculations show that (f (z) = 0) the expansion about z is f (z)f (w) (f(z) − f(w))2 = 1 (z − w)2 + 1 6 S(f)(z)+ 1 12 S (f)(z)(z − w) + · · · (6) where S(f) denotes the Schwarzian derivative. Some (very incomplete list of) references: hep-th/9403108, hep-th/0405152, 1604.05308,1604.03110, 1606.03307 ⇒ Next issue: study of the detailed structure of (5)
  • 39.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final • A simple observation: the exact expression for entanglement entropy satisfies the Louville field equation: δ2 ∂2Sex(f) ∂u∂v = c 6 exp − 12 c Sex(f) . (7)
  • 40.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final • A simple observation: the exact expression for entanglement entropy satisfies the Louville field equation: δ2 ∂2Sex(f) ∂u∂v = c 6 exp − 12 c Sex(f) . (7) • Let f be a nonconstant meromorphic function on a domain D in the complex plane. For z ∈ D with f(z) = ∞, f (z) = 0, we consider the quantity G(z + w, z) = f (z) f(z + w) − f(z) = 1 w − ∞ n=1 ψn[f](z)wn−1 . The quantities ψn[f](z) are called Aharonov invariants.
  • 41.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final • A simple observation: the exact expression for entanglement entropy satisfies the Louville field equation: δ2 ∂2Sex(f) ∂u∂v = c 6 exp − 12 c Sex(f) . (7) • Let f be a nonconstant meromorphic function on a domain D in the complex plane. For z ∈ D with f(z) = ∞, f (z) = 0, we consider the quantity G(z + w, z) = f (z) f(z + w) − f(z) = 1 w − ∞ n=1 ψn[f](z)wn−1 . The quantities ψn[f](z) are called Aharonov invariants. • The Aharonov invariants are all invariant under global (M¨obius) transformations.
  • 42.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Aharonov invariants and Sex(f) • {ψn} exhaust all the M¨obius invariants.
  • 43.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Aharonov invariants and Sex(f) • {ψn} exhaust all the M¨obius invariants. • The quantity ∂G(ζ, z)/∂ζ ∂G(ζ, z) ∂ζ = − f (z)f (ζ) (f(ζ) − f(z))2 = − 1 (ζ − z)2 − ∞ n=1 (n − 1)ψn[f](z)(ζ − z)n−2 . (8) is invariant under M¨obius transformations ψn[M ◦f] = ψn[f], n ≥ 2.
  • 44.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Aharonov invariants and Sex(f) • {ψn} exhaust all the M¨obius invariants. • The quantity ∂G(ζ, z)/∂ζ ∂G(ζ, z) ∂ζ = − f (z)f (ζ) (f(ζ) − f(z))2 = − 1 (ζ − z)2 − ∞ n=1 (n − 1)ψn[f](z)(ζ − z)n−2 . (8) is invariant under M¨obius transformations ψn[M ◦f] = ψn[f], n ≥ 2. The expression entering Sex has the expansion: f (z)f (ζ) (f(ζ)−f(z))2 = 1 (ζ−z)2 + ∞ n=1 (n−1)ψn[f](z)(ζ−z)n−2.
  • 45.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Recursion relations for Aharonov invariants The first two ψn[f] are ψ2[f] = 1 6 f (z) f (z) − 3 2 f (z) f (z) 2 = 1 3! S(f). (9) Aharonov proved the recursion formula: (n+1)ψn[f]=ψn−1[f] + n−2 k=2 ψk[f]ψn−k[f], n≥3. (10) For instance, first few invariants are ψ3[f] = S(f) 4! ; ψ4 = 1 5! [S (f) + 2 S2(f) 3 ]; ψ5 = 1 6! [S (f) + 3 S(f)S (f)]. (11)
  • 46.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Classes univalent functions and Grunsky coefficients
  • 47.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Classes univalent functions and Grunsky coefficients • The classes univalent functions we use are ˜S= f(z)=a1z+a2z2+a3z3+···= ∞ n=1 anzn, a1=0 Σ= g(z)=z+b0+ b1 z +···=bz+ ∞ n=0 bnz−n
  • 48.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Classes univalent functions and Grunsky coefficients • The classes univalent functions we use are ˜S= f(z)=a1z+a2z2+a3z3+···= ∞ n=1 anzn, a1=0 Σ= g(z)=z+b0+ b1 z +···=bz+ ∞ n=0 bnz−n • The functions analytic in (∞, ∞), (∞, 0) and (0, 0): log g(z)−g(ζ) z−ζ , log g(z)−f(ζ) z−ζ , log f(z)−f(ζ) z−ζ •Another definition ( Φ0(w) ≡ 1): g (z) g(z)−w = ∞ n=0 Φn(w)z−n−1, Φn(w)= n m=0 bn,mwm. bn,m are called Grunsky coefficients.
  • 49.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final
  • 50.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final • Expansions: log g(z) − g(ζ) z − ζ = − ∞ m,n=1 bmnz−m ζ−n , log g(z) − f(ζ) z − ζ = − ∞ m=1,n=0 bm,−nz−m ζn , log f(z) − f(ζ) z − ζ = − ∞ m=0,n=0 b−m,−nzm ζn .
  • 51.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final • Expansions: log g(z) − g(ζ) z − ζ = − ∞ m,n=1 bmnz−m ζ−n , log g(z) − f(ζ) z − ζ = − ∞ m=1,n=0 bm,−nz−m ζn , log f(z) − f(ζ) z − ζ = − ∞ m=0,n=0 b−m,−nzm ζn . • Entanglement entropy: f (z)f (w) (f(z) − f(w))2 − 1 (z − w)2 = ∂2 ∂z∂w log f(z) − f(w) z − w = − m,n≥1 mn bmnzm−1 wn−1 . (12)
  • 52.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final ♦ dToda and Grunsky coefficients • Briefs on dToda hierarchy
  • 53.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final ♦ dToda and Grunsky coefficients • Briefs on dToda hierarchy Sato approach to integrable hierarchies: introduce pseudodifferential operators Wm = 1 + w1∂−1 + w2∂−2 + · · · + +wm∂−m . (13) and consider W = lim m→∞ Wm = 1 + w1∂−1 + w2∂−2 + w3∂−3 + · · · , (14) where wj(j = 1, 2, . . . ) are functions of (x, t).
  • 54.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final ♦ dToda and Grunsky coefficients • Briefs on dToda hierarchy Sato approach to integrable hierarchies: introduce pseudodifferential operators Wm = 1 + w1∂−1 + w2∂−2 + · · · + +wm∂−m . (13) and consider W = lim m→∞ Wm = 1 + w1∂−1 + w2∂−2 + w3∂−3 + · · · , (14) where wj(j = 1, 2, . . . ) are functions of (x, t). Define the Lax operator L = W∂W−1 = ∂ + ∞ i=1 ui∂−i+1 , Ln = W∂n W−1 , (15) Define Bn = Ln + B− n = W∂n W−1 + . (16) The Lax equation is ∂L ∂tn = [Bn, L] = BnL − LBn. (17)
  • 55.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Dispersionless Toda hierarchy Definition The dispersionless Toda hierarchy ∂L ∂tn = {Bn, L}, ∂L ∂¯tn = { ¯Bn, L}, (18) ∂ ¯L ∂tn = {Bn, ¯L}, ∂ ¯L ∂¯tn = { ¯Bn, ¯L}, , (19) where L and ¯L are generating functions of unknowns ui = ui(t, ¯t), ¯ui = ¯ui(t, ¯t), L = p + u1 + u2p−1 + u3p−2 + · · · (20) ¯L = ¯u0p−1 + ¯u1 + ¯u2p + ¯u3p2 + · · · (21) and Bn, ¯Bn are defined by Bn = (Ln )≥0 , ¯Bn = ¯L−n ≤0 . (22)
  • 56.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final • The equation (22) =⇒ map to n-th Faber polynomial (in certain basis)! The Grunsky coefficients can be identified as bnm = 1/nm(∂nvm) and can be represented in terms of tau-function ( F = log τdToda)!
  • 57.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final • The equation (22) =⇒ map to n-th Faber polynomial (in certain basis)! The Grunsky coefficients can be identified as bnm = 1/nm(∂nvm) and can be represented in terms of tau-function ( F = log τdToda)! Tau-function and Grunsky coefficients The Grunsky coefficients bnm of the pair (g = w(L), f = w( ¯L)) are related to the tau function, or fee energy as follows: b00=−∂2F ∂t2 0 , bn,0= 1 n ∂2F ∂t0∂tn , b−n,0= 1 n ∂2F ∂t0∂t−n , n≥1 bm,n=− 1 mn ∂2F ∂tm∂tn b−m,−n=− 1 mn ∂2F ∂t−m∂t−n , n,m≥1 b−m,n=bn,−m=− 1 mn ∂2F ∂t−m∂tn , n,m≥1.
  • 58.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final • The equation (22) =⇒ map to n-th Faber polynomial (in certain basis)! The Grunsky coefficients can be identified as bnm = 1/nm(∂nvm) and can be represented in terms of tau-function ( F = log τdToda)! Tau-function and Grunsky coefficients The Grunsky coefficients bnm of the pair (g = w(L), f = w( ¯L)) are related to the tau function, or fee energy as follows: b00=−∂2F ∂t2 0 , bn,0= 1 n ∂2F ∂t0∂tn , b−n,0= 1 n ∂2F ∂t0∂t−n , n≥1 bm,n=− 1 mn ∂2F ∂tm∂tn b−m,−n=− 1 mn ∂2F ∂t−m∂t−n , n,m≥1 b−m,n=bn,−m=− 1 mn ∂2F ∂t−m∂tn , n,m≥1. • The entanglement entropy takes the form Svac−Sex= c 12 log 1+(z−w)2 m,n ∂2F ∂tm∂tn zm−1wn−1 .
  • 59.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final The tau-function The structures appeared so far - SL(2) projective invariants (Schwarzian, Aharonov invariants);
  • 60.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final The tau-function The structures appeared so far - SL(2) projective invariants (Schwarzian, Aharonov invariants); • Next issue: generalization to higher invariants; - Starting point is again the expression: Wm∂m h (j) 0 (x; t) = (∂m + w1(x; t)∂m−1 + · · · + wm(x; t)) h (j) 0 (x; t) = 0, j = 1, 2, . . . , m. (23) One can find the expressions for wj(x; t) as wj(x; t) = h (1) m−1 · · · −h (1) m · · · h (1) 0 ... · · · ... · · · ... h (m) m−1 · · · −h (m) m · · · h (m) 0 h (1) m−1 · · · h (1) m−j · · · h (1) 0 ... · · · ... · · · ... h (m) m−1 · · · h (m) m−j · · · h (m) 0 . (24)
  • 61.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final • As usually, the standard independent solutions f(i) to (23) have been generalized to include ”times” {t1, t2, . . . } ⇒ h (j) i (x; t).
  • 62.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final • As usually, the standard independent solutions f(i) to (23) have been generalized to include ”times” {t1, t2, . . . } ⇒ h (j) i (x; t). • The latter solutions, h (j) i are used to fedine the τ-function, τ(x; t) = h (1) 0 · · · h (m) 0 h (1) 1 · · · h (m) 1 ... · · · ... h (1) m−1 · · · h (m) m−1. (25) where h (j) 0 (x; 0) = f(j) (x), (26) and one can think of h (j) n (x; t) as defined by h(j) n (x; t) = ∂h (j) 0 (x; t) ∂tn = ∂n h (j) 0 (x; t) ∂xn . (27)
  • 63.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final • As usually, the standard independent solutions f(i) to (23) have been generalized to include ”times” {t1, t2, . . . } ⇒ h (j) i (x; t). • The latter solutions, h (j) i are used to fedine the τ-function, τ(x; t) = h (1) 0 · · · h (m) 0 h (1) 1 · · · h (m) 1 ... · · · ... h (1) m−1 · · · h (m) m−1. (25) where h (j) 0 (x; 0) = f(j) (x), (26) and one can think of h (j) n (x; t) as defined by h(j) n (x; t) = ∂h (j) 0 (x; t) ∂tn = ∂n h (j) 0 (x; t) ∂xn . (27) • Relations to wj wj = (−1)j 1 τ S (˜∂t)τ. (28)
  • 64.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final The projective invariants associated to the ordinary differ- ential equation y(n) + pn−2(z)y(n−2) + · · · + p0(z)y = 0, (29) are given by pi ≡ qi = 1 Wn n √ Wn   n−1 j=0 (−1)2n−j (1 − δnj) n − j n − j − i .Wn−j n Wn (n−j−i) , (30) for i = 0, 1, . . . , n − 2.
  • 65.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Here: ˜Wi = f1 f2 · · · fn−1 ... ... ... ... f (i−1) 1 f (i−1) 2 · · · f (i−1) n f (i+1) 1 f (i+1) 2 · · · f (i+1) n ... ... ... ... f (n) 1 f (n) 2 · · · f (n) n−1 , Wi = (−1)n+i ˜W. (31) Examle: Let us apply formula (21) to the n = 2 case - we have only one invariant, namely p0 which is given by p0 = 1 W2 √ W2 W2 W2 − W1 W2 = 1 2 f f − 2 3 f 2 f 2 ≡ 1 2 {f, z}. (32)
  • 66.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final • For completeness, here are the invariants in the case of n = 3. This case corresponds to the third order equation y + p1(z)y + p0(z)y = 0. (33) The formula (21) gives p0 = − 1 3 2 9 f1f2 − f1 f2 f1f2 − f1 f2 3 − f1f2 − f1 f2 f1f2 − f1 f2 − f1f2 − f1 f2 f1f2 − f1 f2 f1 f2 − f1 f2 f1f2 − f1 f2 , (34) p1 = f1 f2 − f1 f2 f1f2 − f1 f2 + f1f2 − f1 f2 f1f2 − f1 f2 − 1 3 f1f2 − f1 f2 f1f2 − f1 f2 2 , or p0 = 1 3 ω1ω2 − ω2 − 2 9 ω3 2 , p1 = ω1 + ω2 − 1 3 ω2 2. where ω1 = W1 W3 = f1 f2 − f1 f2 f1f2 − f1 f2 , ω2 = W2 W3 = f1f2 − f1 f2 f1f2 − f1 f2
  • 67.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Higher spin 3d gravity
  • 68.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Higher spin 3d gravity • From SL(2) formulation to SL(n) - define the connections as A = (aa µTa + aa1...as µ Ta1...as )dxµ ¯A = (¯aa µTa + ¯aa1...as µ Ta1...as )dxµ . The zweibeins and spin connections eµ = 1 2 (Aµ − ¯Aµ), ωµ = 1 2 (Aµ + ¯Aµ).
  • 69.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Higher spin 3d gravity • From SL(2) formulation to SL(n) - define the connections as A = (aa µTa + aa1...as µ Ta1...as )dxµ ¯A = (¯aa µTa + ¯aa1...as µ Ta1...as )dxµ . The zweibeins and spin connections eµ = 1 2 (Aµ − ¯Aµ), ωµ = 1 2 (Aµ + ¯Aµ). • The action Sgrav = SCS[A] − SCS[ ¯A]
  • 70.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Higher spin 3d gravity • From SL(2) formulation to SL(n) - define the connections as A = (aa µTa + aa1...as µ Ta1...as )dxµ ¯A = (¯aa µTa + ¯aa1...as µ Ta1...as )dxµ . The zweibeins and spin connections eµ = 1 2 (Aµ − ¯Aµ), ωµ = 1 2 (Aµ + ¯Aµ). • The action Sgrav = SCS[A] − SCS[ ¯A] + Sbdy.
  • 71.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Higher spin 3d gravity • From SL(2) formulation to SL(n) - define the connections as A = (aa µTa + aa1...as µ Ta1...as )dxµ ¯A = (¯aa µTa + ¯aa1...as µ Ta1...as )dxµ . The zweibeins and spin connections eµ = 1 2 (Aµ − ¯Aµ), ωµ = 1 2 (Aµ + ¯Aµ). • The action Sgrav = SCS[A] − SCS[ ¯A] + Sbdy. • One can apply all the technology we developed so far to this case!
  • 72.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Higher spin 3d gravity • From SL(2) formulation to SL(n) - define the connections as A = (aa µTa + aa1...as µ Ta1...as )dxµ ¯A = (¯aa µTa + ¯aa1...as µ Ta1...as )dxµ . The zweibeins and spin connections eµ = 1 2 (Aµ − ¯Aµ), ωµ = 1 2 (Aµ + ¯Aµ). • The action Sgrav = SCS[A] − SCS[ ¯A] + Sbdy. • One can apply all the technology we developed so far to this case! • Go to the main goal - bulk reconstruction!
  • 73.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final The setup: radial evolution • Consider Lorentzian d + 1 dimensionsl manifold (M, g) which is solution of the Einstein equation. Definition: The manifold (M, g) is called conformally compact if ∃ a defining function ρ−1 (0) = ∂M, ∂ρ = 0 on ∂M, (35) & the conf. equiv. metric 2 ¯g = ρ2 g extends smoothly on ∂M. • Let ∂M = Σ. At some ρ we have Σρ fro which we have n = ∂r = − ρ ∂ρ, Kν µ = γνα αnµ = 1 2 γνα Lvgαµ γµν = gµν − εnµnν, ε = n2 , n ⊥ Σρ. (36) • Radial evolution ∂rΨ(γρ) = Σρ ∂rγij δΨ δγij ∼ ρ=0 2 Σρ γij δΨ δγij , (37) where the last operator is just the operator of conformal scaling. This means that the radial evolution is intimately related to the conformal rescaling.
  • 74.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Ward identities and Wheeler-deWitt equation
  • 75.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Ward identities and Wheeler-deWitt equation • Gauge invariance (2d) HvΨ(A) ≡ Σ vAa + π k δ δA a ¯∂Aa − π k ∂ δ δA a Ψ(A) = 0.
  • 76.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Ward identities and Wheeler-deWitt equation • Gauge invariance (2d) HvΨ(A) ≡ Σ vAa + π k δ δA a ¯∂Aa − π k ∂ δ δA a Ψ(A) = 0. • Diffeomorphisms with parameters (v, ¯v) (as a Hamiltonian constraint) are generated by (2d) HvΨ(A) ≡ Σρ vAa + π k δ δA a ¯∂Aa − π k ∂ δ δA a Ψ(A) = 0.
  • 77.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Ward identities and Wheeler-deWitt equation • Gauge invariance (2d) HvΨ(A) ≡ Σ vAa + π k δ δA a ¯∂Aa − π k ∂ δ δA a Ψ(A) = 0. • Diffeomorphisms with parameters (v, ¯v) (as a Hamiltonian constraint) are generated by (2d) HvΨ(A) ≡ Σρ vAa + π k δ δA a ¯∂Aa − π k ∂ δ δA a Ψ(A) = 0. • Make Fourier-Laplace transformation: Ψ(µ) = DAΨ(A)χµ(A), χµ = e− k 2π µ tr A2 . (38)
  • 78.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Ward identities and Wheeler-deWitt equation • Gauge invariance (2d) HvΨ(A) ≡ Σ vAa + π k δ δA a ¯∂Aa − π k ∂ δ δA a Ψ(A) = 0. • Diffeomorphisms with parameters (v, ¯v) (as a Hamiltonian constraint) are generated by (2d) HvΨ(A) ≡ Σρ vAa + π k δ δA a ¯∂Aa − π k ∂ δ δA a Ψ(A) = 0. • Make Fourier-Laplace transformation: Ψ(µ) = DAΨ(A)χµ(A), χµ = e− k 2π µ tr A2 . (38) • The Hv constraint in µ-representation =⇒ Ward Identity HvΨ(A) = 0 ⇒ Σρ (v + µ¯v) ¯∂ − µ∂ − 2∂µ δ δµ(z) Ψ(A) = − c 12π Σρ d2 z(v + µ¯v)∂3 µΨ(A),
  • 79.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Wheeler-deWitt equation and Ward Identity • Define for 3d gravity case the conjugate Πab = 2 √ γ δ δγab , Π = πa a, • Diffeo’s Hb = aΠa b . • The Hamiltonian constraint (geometry idependence, AdS case) H = κ2 : Πab Πcd Gabcd − Π2 d − 1 : +R(γ) + d(d − 1) l2 ,
  • 80.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Wheeler-deWitt equation and Ward Identity • Define for 3d gravity case the conjugate Πab = 2 √ γ δ δγab , Π = πa a, • Diffeo’s Hb = aΠa b . • The Hamiltonian constraint (geometry idependence, AdS case) H = κ2 : Πab Πcd Gabcd − Π2 d − 1 : +R(γ) + d(d − 1) l2 , implies ”Wheeler-deWitt equation! HΨ = 0.
  • 81.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Wheeler-deWitt equation and Ward Identity
  • 82.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Wheeler-deWitt equation and Ward Identity • On the other hand Ψ ≡ Ψ[A] = DµΨ(µ)χµ(−A). Therefore, 3d functionsl Ψ[A] satisfies Wheeler-deWitt equation providing µ fulfills 2d Ward Identity!
  • 83.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Wheeler-deWitt equation and Ward Identity • On the other hand Ψ ≡ Ψ[A] = DµΨ(µ)χµ(−A). Therefore, 3d functionsl Ψ[A] satisfies Wheeler-deWitt equation providing µ fulfills 2d Ward Identity! • The last statement provides direct proof of the holography in this particular case!
  • 84.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Wheeler-deWitt equation and Ward Identity • On the other hand Ψ ≡ Ψ[A] = DµΨ(µ)χµ(−A). Therefore, 3d functionsl Ψ[A] satisfies Wheeler-deWitt equation providing µ fulfills 2d Ward Identity! • The last statement provides direct proof of the holography in this particular case! • The projective invariants provide bases for W-geometries and higher spin theories!
  • 85.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Wheeler-deWitt equation and Ward Identity • On the other hand Ψ ≡ Ψ[A] = DµΨ(µ)χµ(−A). Therefore, 3d functionsl Ψ[A] satisfies Wheeler-deWitt equation providing µ fulfills 2d Ward Identity! • The last statement provides direct proof of the holography in this particular case! • The projective invariants provide bases for W-geometries and higher spin theories! • For n = 3 (W3 case) the action in terms of invariants L ∼ q0 ¯q0 + q1 ¯q1.
  • 86.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Wheeler-deWitt equation and Ward Identity • On the other hand Ψ ≡ Ψ[A] = DµΨ(µ)χµ(−A). Therefore, 3d functionsl Ψ[A] satisfies Wheeler-deWitt equation providing µ fulfills 2d Ward Identity! • The last statement provides direct proof of the holography in this particular case! • The projective invariants provide bases for W-geometries and higher spin theories! • For n = 3 (W3 case) the action in terms of invariants L ∼ q0 ¯q0 + q1 ¯q1. • For general n (Wn case) L ∼ i coeffi tr qi ¯qj + · · · .
  • 87.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final A sketch of relation to SYK • The Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev (SYK) model describes interacting Majorana fermions with random (gaussian) coupling S = i 2 dt   N α=1 ψα ∂ψα − iq α1...αq Jα1...αq ψα1 . . . ψαq ,   where Jα1...αq Jβ1...βq = J2 (q − 1) Nq−1 q i δαiβi . • SYK model addresses many interesting issues as properties of non-Fermi liquid behavior, quantum chaos, emergent conformal symmetry and holographic duality. SYK model can be used to describe black holes (BHs) in 2d nearly-Anti-de-Sitter gravity. • The effective action is just the Schwarzian SSch = −C td{f, t}, {f, t} = f f − 3 2 f f 2 .
  • 88.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final
  • 89.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final • 2d generalization suggested in 1701.00528 (G. Turiaci, H, Verlinde), leading to double Schwarzian theory in the UV (in light-cone) SUV ∼ du dv{x+, u}{x−, v}.
  • 90.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final • 2d generalization suggested in 1701.00528 (G. Turiaci, H, Verlinde), leading to double Schwarzian theory in the UV (in light-cone) SUV ∼ du dv{x+, u}{x−, v}. • Using Lagrange multipliers ⇐⇒ SUV ∼ du dv e+ v {x+, u} + e+ u {x+, v} − µν e+ µ e− ν .
  • 91.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final • 2d generalization suggested in 1701.00528 (G. Turiaci, H, Verlinde), leading to double Schwarzian theory in the UV (in light-cone) SUV ∼ du dv{x+, u}{x−, v}. • Using Lagrange multipliers ⇐⇒ SUV ∼ du dv e+ v {x+, u} + e+ u {x+, v} − µν e+ µ e− ν . • Relations between double Schwarzian & Polyakov-Liouville actions (L ∼ p0 ¯p0 in our case) - in 1701.00528 (G. Turiaci, H, Verlinde) Sgrav[E] = min e SL(E + e) − µν e+ µ e− ν .
  • 92.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final
  • 93.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final • Using the same logic as in the SL(2) case, for n=3 we propose the higher spin SYK 2D theory by the lagrangian density L ∼ 1 3 ω1ω2 − ω2 − 2 9 ω3 2 . 1 3 ω1ω2 − ω2 − 2 9 ω3 2 + (ω1 + ω2 − 1 3 ω2 2)(ω1 + ω2 − 1 3 ω2 2). (39) - some other reductions of 2D → 1D are discussed in 1705.08408 (T. Mertens, G. Turiaci and H. Verlinde).
  • 94.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final • Using the same logic as in the SL(2) case, for n=3 we propose the higher spin SYK 2D theory by the lagrangian density L ∼ 1 3 ω1ω2 − ω2 − 2 9 ω3 2 . 1 3 ω1ω2 − ω2 − 2 9 ω3 2 + (ω1 + ω2 − 1 3 ω2 2)(ω1 + ω2 − 1 3 ω2 2). (39) - some other reductions of 2D → 1D are discussed in 1705.08408 (T. Mertens, G. Turiaci and H. Verlinde). • We generalize the above picture to arbitrary higher spin theories by making use of W-geometry and jet bundles!
  • 95.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Summary • Putting all these considerations together, one can draw the following conclusions:
  • 96.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Summary • Putting all these considerations together, one can draw the following conclusions: We found that the following quantities are related by appropriate tau-functions: - entanglement entropy and Aharonov invariants; - Higher spin gravities; - higher projective invariants.
  • 97.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Summary • Putting all these considerations together, one can draw the following conclusions: We found that the following quantities are related by appropriate tau-functions: - entanglement entropy and Aharonov invariants; - Higher spin gravities; - higher projective invariants. The basis for W-geometries are related to tau-functions
  • 98.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Summary • Putting all these considerations together, one can draw the following conclusions: We found that the following quantities are related by appropriate tau-functions: - entanglement entropy and Aharonov invariants; - Higher spin gravities; - higher projective invariants. The basis for W-geometries are related to tau-functions We propose a generalization of the relations between SYK (Schwarzian) model, integrable 2d CFT and 3d Gravity
  • 99.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Summary • Putting all these considerations together, one can draw the following conclusions: We found that the following quantities are related by appropriate tau-functions: - entanglement entropy and Aharonov invariants; - Higher spin gravities; - higher projective invariants. The basis for W-geometries are related to tau-functions We propose a generalization of the relations between SYK (Schwarzian) model, integrable 2d CFT and 3d Gravity We suggest that all these have geometric description in terms of W-geometries;
  • 100.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final Summary • Putting all these considerations together, one can draw the following conclusions: We found that the following quantities are related by appropriate tau-functions: - entanglement entropy and Aharonov invariants; - Higher spin gravities; - higher projective invariants. The basis for W-geometries are related to tau-functions We propose a generalization of the relations between SYK (Schwarzian) model, integrable 2d CFT and 3d Gravity We suggest that all these have geometric description in terms of W-geometries; We give arguments that entanglement entropies in low-dimensionnal holography is intimately related to Toda theory.
  • 101.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final • Future directions
  • 102.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final • Future directions Generalization of HS projective actions for 1d and 2d theories
  • 103.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final • Future directions Generalization of HS projective actions for 1d and 2d theories Reconstruction of bulk theories
  • 104.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final • Future directions Generalization of HS projective actions for 1d and 2d theories Reconstruction of bulk theories Localization for 1-loop exact partition function - Stanford-Witten, 1703.04612 Z = dµ[φ] SL(2, R) exp  − 1 2g2 2π 0 dτ φ 2 φ 2 − φ 2  
  • 105.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final • Future directions Generalization of HS projective actions for 1d and 2d theories Reconstruction of bulk theories Localization for 1-loop exact partition function - Stanford-Witten, 1703.04612 Z = dµ[φ] SL(2, R) exp  − 1 2g2 2π 0 dτ φ 2 φ 2 − φ 2   Generalization for 4d/3d holography
  • 106.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final • Future directions Generalization of HS projective actions for 1d and 2d theories Reconstruction of bulk theories Localization for 1-loop exact partition function - Stanford-Witten, 1703.04612 Z = dµ[φ] SL(2, R) exp  − 1 2g2 2π 0 dτ φ 2 φ 2 − φ 2   Generalization for 4d/3d holography Study wide variety of physical consequences
  • 107.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final • Future directions Generalization of HS projective actions for 1d and 2d theories Reconstruction of bulk theories Localization for 1-loop exact partition function - Stanford-Witten, 1703.04612 Z = dµ[φ] SL(2, R) exp  − 1 2g2 2π 0 dτ φ 2 φ 2 − φ 2   Generalization for 4d/3d holography Study wide variety of physical consequences Generalizations of T ¯T deformations and Ban˜ados metric?
  • 108.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final • Future directions Generalization of HS projective actions for 1d and 2d theories Reconstruction of bulk theories Localization for 1-loop exact partition function - Stanford-Witten, 1703.04612 Z = dµ[φ] SL(2, R) exp  − 1 2g2 2π 0 dτ φ 2 φ 2 − φ 2   Generalization for 4d/3d holography Study wide variety of physical consequences Generalizations of T ¯T deformations and Ban˜ados metric? . . . and much more . . .
  • 109.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final
  • 110.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final 15 years SEENET - Congratulations!
  • 111.
    Integrable Structures in Low-dimensional Holography and Cosmology R.C.Rashkov† Outline M¨obius structure of entanlement entropy: Aharonov invariants and dToda tau-function Dispesionless Toda and entanglement entropy of excited states Higher projective invariants and W-geometry Higher spin holography and more Final 15 years SEENET - Congratulations! T H A N K Y O U!