The Five Theories Of American Democracy

The Five Theories Of American Democracy
Issue Analysis Paper This paper will serve as a way of introducing the three competing theories of
American democracy, which are Pluralism, the Elite theory, and Hyper pluralism. The following
theories can all be applied as a lens to see American politics through, each serving as an essential
part of government. Among this paper, we will come across a bill (S 256), this bill was fighting to
overhaul the federal bankruptcy code, making it harder for people to file for bankruptcy. To file for
bankruptcy individuals would have to go through the means test first. This paper will also examine
what theory of American democracy is best portrayed within the bill. Pluralism is one of the three
theories of government, which is a condition or system in which two or more states, groups,
principles, sources of authority, etc., coexist. Pluralism is a combination of different sorts of people
among the many are like–minded people, unions, professional associates, and business lobbyists.
For pluralism to operate and to be successful in establishing the common ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The elite theory believes that a small group consisting of powerful people holds the most power, and
that this power is independent of a state's democratic elections process. Elite theory argues either
that democracy is in all unrealistic, or that democracy is not able to be achieved within capitalism.
Within the elite theory not everyone is going to have the power when making decisions only the
most powerful group. Overall meaning the elite theory can determine the trajectory of the society,
and therefore the conditions which the members of that society must exist and function. When
considering who's interest does the elite theory compromise it would be hard to find an answer
considering that all these groups work together to protect each other's
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

What Is Democracy In American Democracy
Democracies have been around for hundreds of years, dating back to before the word democracy
was created by the ancient Greeks. Democracies give the citizens of the nation power and let them
have a say so in politics. Also, the people have many freedoms guaranteed to them unlike other
types of government. The people elect local, state, and national government officials. The local
government deals with many different cases. State government shares most of its power with the
national government. Lastly, the national government oversees all the smaller forms of government
in the land. [Thesis] American Democracy fits the definition of democracy because the people are
represented fairly through local, state, and national government. To begin, local government acts on
behalf on specific areas known as counties, towns, or districts. We as the people vote on councilman
to represent our county. The councilman vote on and determine how much money our schools can
spend. They can also enact on our counties taxes. Local government can't pass or enforce laws that
might put judgment on a much bigger area other than its own. We have a choice in who we vote for
to make sure we are represented fairly. As a person who makes us a part of our county, district, or
town. We all want the best for the next generation for our sons and daughters. The people who we
vote on as our councilman decide that. What will our schools be like, if we will have technology for
our children to use in

American Democracy Essays
American Democracy
The American democracy is one of the most peaceful kinds of government in the world although it
is a long way from utopia. The democracy in which we live has many strengths and weaknesses.
Neither strengths or weaknesses out weigh one another, but it is necessary to have both due to the
varying definitions. A democracy is a government that is run by the people. The politicians that we
elect to run our government are human and they are susceptible to mistakes based on their own
strengths and weaknesses. The strengths and weaknesses they possess are reflected into our
government but at least "we the people" elect them and they are not chosen for us.
We live in a representative democracy that means "we the people" ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
It is kind of like a relationship, you tend to remember the bad more than the good. The same applies
to campaigning. When some of us go to the ballot box we remember certain commercials either on
the television or radio. And nine times out of ten, we remember the negative commercials over the
positive.
The campaigns are suppose to educate us and negative campaigns is not a good way to do that. The
positive campaigns are the ones that should educate us. Positive campaigns promote "the will of the
people." The "will of the people" want trust, security, someone they can relate to. But with positive
campaigns there is a drawback, it costs more money. Now you have those people who want to
reform campaign finance. They feel we already spend too much money on campaigning. If you have
the money supporting you, then you should be allowed to spend the money in whatever way it best
suits your campaigning. More money does not mean a victory, just ask Ross Perot. More money
could mean more positive campaigns and better education about the politicians for "we the people."
Some people feel we should let the newspapers and media inform us about candidates, but the media
is the worst critic of all. Journalists are paid big bucks to see who can find the dirtiest secret one
person has done. So, what positive influences could the media possibly provide to us? Our media in
this country is out of control and they inform us of issues we do not need to know about. While

Democracy: The American Democracy
The American Democracy is dramatically changing. In fact the government is not at its best place at
the very moment, but it takes the voice and actions of the citizens to make it better. Our republic is
built on laws, in which the American citizens have adapted to. Over the years, many things have
altered in America, so the Republic should also modify itself, to equalize with how the world is
today. There should be an adjustment to the ways of getting Americans involved. Social media is a
perfect way to get started. Research says that President Barack Obama earned most votes through
social media with online activity, to get the public to vote. Honestly, President Obama's campaign
showed the wonderful impact that social media can have on getting

Similarities Between Greek And American Democracy
The word democracy comes from two Greek words: demos, meaning "the people," and kratein,
meaning "to rule." These two words are joined together to form a democracy, literally meaning "rule
by the people". Nowadays democracy could be referred as a rule of the majority. It is a system of
government in which the citizens exercise power directly or choose delegates from among
themselves to form a governing body, such as a parliament. The Greek system of government was
maybe more like a true democracy or administered by the general population than any other ever.
On the other hand, most American politicians with mindfulness and knowledge have realized that
the U.S. is not a Democracy as a country, regardless of the way that most people declare it to be a
Democracy. Greek and American democracy have some similarities such as the amount of
nationalism and patriotism saw in the people when a lack of representation for a city–state or nation
as a whole is seen, and they both vote for their political leaders. First, Greek and American
democracy has almost the same amount of nationalism and patriotism saw in the people. For
instance, the Athenian individuals respected their energy and presence exceptionally. "Pericles says
in regard to his policy: Remember that the motivation behind why Athens has the best name in all
the world is on the grounds that she has never offered into affliction. However, has spent more life
and work in fighting than some other states. Like this

The Pros And Cons Of American Democracy
American Democracy is an important thing in our society. Everybody knows how powerful it can
be. It is the most important thing in our Constitution that our Founding Fathers introduced. As
citizens in today's society, we all should know about it. We should know the history of it and how it
works to understand what our government is doing to us that affects our daily lives. The
Government decides what we can and can't do. The American Democracy is not powerful because
we as citizens control what we want, what is right in our country, and what represents us as whole
nation.
Do I think the American Democracy in peril as the system of checks and balances within the
American Government is disappearing? Yes, the American Democracy is in danger as the system of
checks and balances are disappearing. First, let me explain checks and balances. The system of
Checks and Balances is split up into 3 different branches. The three branches are Legislative,
Executive and Judicial. Each ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Supreme Court is very powerful in our Government. Their decisions impact our society. An
example of this is the Judicial Review. Judicial Review s a review that is done by the Supreme Court
to see if the legislative act is good or now. However, the Supreme Court not the final say in making
our decisions. Every branch have their part in making the final decision. It is given to each branch,
so if it doesn't pass in one branch, then the bill will stop immediately or go back and be revised. The
Supreme Court are powerful in several way though. For instance, Supreme Court have the power to
check the Congress and the President. It have the final say in laws that is with the Constitution and
Congress. However, it will always be check by other branches, so it can't be too powerful
whatsoever. Another thing is that the President also elects whoever can be on the Supreme Court,
but the nominees have to be approved by the

American Democracy Characteristics
The characteristics of American Democracy are individualism, political equality, popular consent,
majority rule with the preservation of minority rights, and personal liberty (South University Online,
2016). Individualism puts the individual at the forefront of decision making power (SUO, 2016).
Although we do not have specific power in the decision making process, we have a representative
form of democracy where elected officials speak for the people, however, the individual has a strong
voice in the American form of democracy (Borade, 2012). Political equality gives the same voice of
each individual citizen the same power as another person's voice (SUO, 2016). The government has
put into place laws that ensure every citizen has equal opportunity to vote, and have their voice
heard in the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The United States elects a president that is both head of state and head of government. In other
democracies, the leader of the government is not both head of state and head of government. In the
American form of democracy, there are only two major political parties, in other governments there
may be multiple parties represented (IIP Digital, 2008). Our president, and other government
officials are elected for a specific period of time, whereas other governments may call an election at
any time (IIP Digital, 2008). In the American form of democracy, representatives are chosen to
represent the citizens, and to make decisions for them (USHistory.org, 2016). This is unique to the
American democracy. In other democracies, citizens meet to discuss the policy issues and the
majority rule decide the issues (USHistory.org, 2016). However, a representative democracy makes
the government more manageable whereby only the elected representatives actually vote on the
issues (USHistory.org,

American Democracy 1900-1970
Between 1900 and 1970, a series of laws and Constitutional amendments strengthened American
democracy through the expansion of voting rights. At the beginning of the twentieth century, the
vote was largely restricted to white males over the age of 21. Seventy years later, women, African–
Americans, and college–age youth enjoyed unprecedented access to the ballot. These monumental
gains came through hard struggle and organized social movements. Interestingly, the causes that
initially animated these movements did not focus on voting. The early twentieth century women's
suffrage movement came on the heels of heightened women's activism in the area of Progressive
reform. Later in the century a Civil Rights movement focused on desegregation and an anti–war
crusade prompted their primary proponents to turn their attention to voting rights. These three cases
demonstrate that the expansion of American democracy in the twentieth century was driven by a ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
However, one of the most praised deals by the government in the early 1900's was the New Deal, as
Christopher Pyland had said in his Module 3 debate "there was some shady stuff going on, the
politician tried to stack the supreme court and basically rig everything" This isn't democracy when
the government is trying to get there way and not thinking about the people. America needed a
leader that saw the future of America, they got this with the election of Theodore Roosevelt. In his
letter "The right of the People to Rule" he discusses how he believes that America has many
obstacles to overcome including racial inequality. The main focus of the article is that he believed
the people were competent enough to be able to govern themselves if need be "Are the American
people fit to govern themselves, to rule themselves, to control themselves? I believe they are; my
opponents do not. I believe in the right of the people to rule" (Roosevelt,

Democracy In The American Democracy
From the early 1840s to the present day, a democracy can be described as a flawed establishment
which has been shaped by the power of wealth and control, complex social relations, and most
importantly the people's desire to live a fulfilling life. Throughout this time period the principles of
democracy, such as equality, protection of the people's interest, and promotion of human rights were
shifting in order to increase the democracy efficiency. Therefore the continued importance of the
Bill of Rights, the Declaration of Independence, and Constitution remain significant since, in
American today, democracy is a system that is continuously being shaped by the people within it.
Plato's impression of democracy which was intellectualized around 384 B.C.E is rather different
from the present day understanding of democracy and the power of wealth. As an aristocrat himself,
according to Plato "When the poor win, the result is a democracy." (Plato, p.58). In other words,
Plato believed that only kings were authorized to rule its society, whereas regular everyday people
were perceived as ferocious and unable to govern. Plato's awareness of democracy was established
when he realized ordinary people were not born to lead, that only the elite people had the utmost
respect, and right to rule over the lower class. Furthermore, the concept of power and wealth
continues to be a crucial stand point in society's then, and now since the exercise of democracy is
known to be a political affair.

Annotated Bibliography: American Democracy
Annotated Bibliography
马梓涵
1, Fish, Carl Russell. "American Democracy." Minnesota History Bulletin 3, no. 5 (1920): 251–72.
This essay provides a clear and well–organized understanding of American Democracy. It described
what the writer believes in the definition of American Democracy, which has three main elements.
The first element is personal liberty, which also refers to power of the majority, "kept in equipoise
by a system of checks and balances." The Second element is the equality of both "before the law"
and "making the law". The last element is the opportunity, which is equal in education and need to
be maintained by a great change in the character of American life.
This material provides me a clear understanding of the American democracy, ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
The interesting thing is the central party of China is the Communist Party, which means this
professor may have some bias. However, this article are mostly the objective analysis without much
comments on the anticommunism. So it is a very valuable material for me to understand the origin
of anticommunism of the U.S.
8, Jian Chen, "Redefinition of the Cold War in Strategic Level," International Politics Quarterly
March 2008
The material is mainly about the prejudice of the U.S. towards China during the Cold War, the
strategic adjustment of Nixon and Kissinger and the the origin of unfreezing of the relationship
between the U.S. and China, the problem of the Taiwan and Vietnam in the process of the alleviation
of US–China relationship, and the redefinition of the Cold War in strategic level.
The writer of this article is the professor of China–US relations in Cornell University. So this is a
relatively reliable source. I think the relationship between the U.S. and China can also reflect U.S.
Attitude towards communism after the cold war. I can use it in the extending of my term

The Fault In American Democracy
American Politics: The Fault In Our Democracy
From the birth of our nation, the United States' greatest attribute has been our democracy. A
democracy that throughout history we have fought and advocated for in foreign lands. A democracy
that has caused the division of our nation, through which we shed our brother's blood to unite once
more. A democracy so beautiful that it has became infamous and erects hatred and malice in the
hearts of our nation's enemies. This great democracy, however, has a great self–destructive
weakness. The chink in our democratic armor, is our desire of pristine politicians. Politicians of
today are bound to a black and white world. Where one must choose which of two sides their beliefs
fall or risk fighting an up–hill battle to be elected. Two of these sides have names that we all hear on
a daily occurrence, Republicans and Democrats. These political parties play such majors roles in the
politics of today, that there isn't much room for a another party. Should one choose to not affiliate
with one of the two major parties, they are casted to a third party. A third party is defined by Webster
dictionary as "a major political ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
let me elaborate on that. If a politician runs for a certain party, why do we expect them to have
always voted for that party? Americans have double standards. Double standards that limit who we
vote for. Are politicians not people too? I believe that politicians should not be expected to vote for
their respected party every time they step up to vote. whose to say that the person who is running in
their party isn't someone that is crazy? According to congressional quarterly, Senator John McCain
Has voted along the republican line eighty–six percent of the time since elected to congress in 1986.
That may sound bias, but in actuality, it's not. Senator McCain, actually has one of the more swaying
opinions in the

Pros And Cons Of Our American Democracy
Our America's Democracy America's democracy is an important part of our history and what has
made this country what it is today. There are many pros and cons in relation to how our country is
run when it concerns the U.S. Constitution. Something that is important is that America is how the
framers came up with the idea of what democracy is to help this nation to succeed and to help
provide a good model to be followed throughout the world. There are different parts of our
government which has powers yet they must consult with the other powers before following through
and executing their proposals. Another factor that has played an important role in the development
of our American democracy is where there is a big separation of government and religion. Our
American democracy has our U.S. Constitution which relies on the three branches of government
where the political parties have candidates which are voted into office. This paper will discuss how
federalism is incorporated into our Constitution and what the purpose is in having three branches of
government, the reason behind having the political parties and how this is incorporated into our
American Democracy.
US Constitution Our U.S. Constitution was put together by the Framers to help provide the
government the laws to help provide civil right and liberties to our American citizens. The Framers
came from England where they did not have the rights, liberties and freedoms we have today and
they wanted to make sure their

Health Of American Democracy Essay
This paper will evaluate the health of U.S. democracy by focusing on the on a key element that
makes for a healthy democracy: effective representation. By effective representation I refer to
communication between both representatives and constituents, through policy enactments and
elections, respectively, to serve the people and the interest of the country as a whole. Whether the
U.S. is living up to this standard can be evaluated through multiple avenues, in this paper I will only
evaluate the health of democratic representation in the U.S. by examining the competence of the
public (voters). Numerous scholars and researchers have cast doubt upon how well democracy in the
U.S. functions in the United States. Before examining the deficiencies of the public, it must be noted
that while no governmental system is perfect by any means, anarchism as an alternative to
government is not a practical solution (Dahl, Chapter 3, pp. 50–51). ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
297). This understanding of democracy has led to the belief in the normative "folk theory" of
democracy, whereby citizens (hereafter referred to as the people) are able to formulate policy
positions, assess where candidates fall on political issues, and vote for candidate(s) who best
exemplifies their policy preferences (Achen and Bartels).This theory additionally implies that voters
in turn get what they want because candidates and political parties are assumed to cater to the
preferences of the voters in order to maximize their chance of getting elected. However, this theory
amounts to little more than a fictional ideal in real–world

Essay On American Democracy
This nation's success lies in the hands of its people. America is extremely fortunate to live in a
democracy, a government in which the citizens elect the leaders and representatives. The idea of it
began in the Athens when an emperor wanted his people to be involved in creating rules and
choosing overseers for their society. This idea became highly popular in the Middle Ages, but
empires like the "Holy Roman Empire" overruled it for dictatorship, but people soon began to fight
back (Karen Carr). America's fight was to succeed from England in the revolutionary war in hopes
of having the basic rights that democracy promises. The citizens demanded a voice in their
government so they fought hard and though lives were lost, the United States won its independence
from England. The actions, dedication, and perseverance of the citizens were the main reasons why
this country gained its freedom. Citizens are the vital key to success so it is important for them to be
active in electing proper officials, recognizing past mistakes and correcting current ones in today's
society. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
For example, in the city of Warr Acres citizens have the opportunity to attend city council meetings,
consult with board members, and further their knowledge on current events. During the meetings
citizens are allowed to bring forward current issues and ideas to the board for consideration when it
pertains to the agenda. The board consists of highly respectable leaders that will hear the issues of
the people and make adjustments, if needed, to overall better the city. It takes initiation and courage
to express to the desire for change, but it is important for citizens to always seek room for
improvement in their community. Citizens have unlimited opportunities to voice their opinion and
make an impact, but they just have to have the desire to want to make a

The Framers: The Creation Of American Democracy
The Creation of the American Democracy
When the Framers of the Constitution met in Philadelphia, they came together with one common
purpose in mind. They needed to form a fair and solid system of government that would stand the
test of time; one that was both fair for the people and would not involve a monarchy. Each of these
men had their own ideas on what would constitute this system, however, so many compromises had
to be made. Together, the men gathered in Philadelphia created a federal system of government and
drafted a constitution outlining this government. They took care in developing three branches of
federal government with a system of checks and balances so that no one branch would gain too
much power, thus avoiding any ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
While the popular party was in favor of using paper money to pay off debts, such as was done in
Rhode Island, the upper–class patricians saw this as unacceptable. Since the Philadelphia
Convention consisted of the conservative aristocrats (there was no representative from Rhode
Island), paper money was outlawed and a national bank was set up. Although this may have been the
fairest and most logical set–up, it was not a democratic plan because it did not uphold the common
interests of the people.
The Electoral College is also an example of a plan implemented by the Framers that does not always
uphold the common interests of the people. While many reasons are cited as to why the Framers
chose this system, two stand out as being most prominent: They were concerned about
representation for small states, and they wanted a precautionary system to ensure that the official
who took the oath of President was indeed able to sufficiently perform these duties. Electors were
supposed to vote with the majority decision of their state, but there was no law saying they had to.
The latter of the two explanations is most undemocratic, although the Electoral College system is

Difference Between American Democracy And Athenian Democracy
Amanda Milito
HI 101–OL3
Professor Brozyna
October 21, 2016
Essay #2
Athenian Democracy & American Democracy Differences
The differences between American Democracy and Athenian Democracy are very noticeable and
cannot be repudiated. Although American Democracy stems from Athenian Democracy, it has
branched out and become totally different from the way Athens was run and governed. From the
way each democracy's branches are set up to who votes and how it is counted both have very
unrelated systems.
Athenian Democracy vs. American Democracy:
Athenian Democracy was a direct democracy. This meant that all citizens voted and whatever the
majority rule was that was the final deciding factor. Majority rule decided votes and leaders. The
only ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Directly from the beginning there is a difference right off the bat. Athens was a direct democracy
while the United States is a republic democracy. Being the fact that these two are total different
ways of democracy each country was run differently. Automatically in Athens the people choose
everything they want from the way they govern right down to the laws and court systems. The
United States was tired of being under British rule before democracy was established. The
establishers of democracy in the US decided that democracy was best so the people can choose what
they want and who they want. Instead of having an all–out frenzy from a direct democracy which
allows citizens to do whatever they want and choose what they want the people still choose what
and who they want they just allow people to speak for them and their rights. Although the United
States has roots that stem from the Athenian democracy system they tweaked American democracy
to fit the needs of this

Essay On American Democracy
American democracy may be winning but, are both democratic and non–democratic elements
working for our good? Although, our government has become extremely corrupt, and inefficient, the
American people still have hope. Unfortunately, this has been demonstrated many times when it
comes to creating laws that benefit all citizens. Just as, the issues of our electoral process is also a
concern, along with the impact of the media and interest groups. Consequently, the question is raised
can government programs solve the issues we face?
Introduction
Is American democracy working? The fact is, we have failed to hold politicians accountable for their
failures in accurately and justly representing the American people. Besides, there is a complete ...
In general, the process that we have to hold elections is fair, in that, we let the people of the United
States decide who will take over an office, and this makes our electoral process better than most
other countries. However, the voting system in the United States can be improved greatly. Because,
we can only vote for one candidate we often are forced to choose who we think will win, opposed to
who we believe is best for the job. Besides, some may say that this type of voting is not healthy for
our democracy, but currently it is working. One controversial aspect of our electoral process is the
Electoral College. This process makes it possible for a candidate that comes in second in the popular
vote to become President (Bardes, Shelly, Schmidt, 47). Inadvertently, this may leave a loop hole
open for cheating in the electoral process, whereas, it may be easier to corrupt electors than to
corrupt a whole state of voters. The most concerning aspect of our electoral process may be the
influence of money. Because, we have an opportunity for both individuals and corporations to
donate unlimited amounts of money, this poses a threat to the electoral process. Aside from money
there is also voter suppression. As an African American I consider voting to be cherished and
celebrated. After all, many of my ancestors died for my right to do so. For this reason alone,
Americans would like to see change take form in our

The Greco-Christian Beliefs Of American Democracy
In the winter of December 7th, 1787, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, the U.S. Constitution was
ratified to establish the new country of the United States as a democracy. After their victory over the
British for American Independence, the United States government created the Constitution in an
effort to further establish themselves as an independent nation. With a new form of government that
would not allow the injustices caused by the British monarchy to occur again, the Constitution's
fundamental principles abided by many of the Greco–Roman and Judeo–Christian beliefs about
people and government. The Judeo–Christian and Greco–Roman seeds of democracy contributed to
the United States' democratic government by protecting the rights of the individual and by giving
the ability for the citizens to vote on its leaders and laws.
The American Constitution was influenced partly by Judeo–Christian ideas, mainly that the natural
rights of individual should be protected and unalienable. Followers of Judaism surmised that
humans were created in God's image, and as such each individual "has a divine spark that gives him
or her a dignity that cannot be taken away" (M.W.H. 12). In the American democracy, the Bill of
Rights gives all of the country's citizens certain rights that are unalienable, and cannot be taken
away. As opposed to other forms of government, where the social status of a citizen determined his
or her rights, the American Constitution gave all citizens the same rights

What Does It Mean To Be An American Democracy
"I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it
stands, one Nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."
To the "Republic." Yes, that's right. We Americans have a (partly) Republican democracy. Still,
when I ask others, most of them say: "We're a Democracy!"
For all those individuals who have been living in the United States, happily thinking that we're a
Democracy, well, you're wrong. According to the constitution, the United States is a Representative
Democracy. This means we're a republic and democracy. Because our founding fathers couldn't
choose between them, we Americans have the best of both worlds; but, not everyone does, or did.
Athens, Greece was a democracy. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This is because everyone's opinion counts towards it, and the election is reasonable. I think this is a
lot more sensible than Democracy, in which the people vote on everything, and leaders aren't chosen
through an election. Today, if we Americans had a democratic government, we would be going out
to vote every single day. Our busy lives do not have room for that! Also, if leaders are not chosen
through election, how do the citizens know that their leader is reliable? How do they know he's
trustworthy? The answer is: they don't. They didn't elect him!
Democracy doesn't protect the rights of each citizen and his or her property. Republic, on the other
hand, does. Why is this better? Protected rights are more beneficial to the citizens. A simple majority
vote can not change Citizens' rights. In a Democracy, rights of the majority can overwhelm the
rights of the minority. For example, if the citizens voted on taking someone's property, the
government wouldn't protect that person's rights. There would be nothing stopping the citizens from
taking away his or her rights. This isn't fair and isn't good for the

Summary: American-Style Of Democracy
Three Source Analysis Source one depicts a critical view on American–style of Democracy. The
newspaper that the elderly woman holds in the illustration shows the Iraqi people flooded to their
polling stations to vote for their next great leader while no people have appeared at the American
precinct to vote. The lady questions "So has Iraq achieved American–style Democracy?" which
clearly isn't working as effectively as the Iraqi system, making her assumption that they eventually
will convert silly. The elderly man replies "Not yet, but give 'em time..." having a comedic effect
due to the cobweb strung from the man's head implying he's been doing just that for an extended
period time with no success. Tall buildings seen through the window of the precinct show the local
area to be well populated and full of potential voters. The artist of this source conveys them
American–style democratic system as flawed and probably what most countries should use as their
political guideline. In source two, Hitler explains how general elections don't bring fourth leaders,
but rather mediocre leaders more often than not. A truly great leader, or as Hitler referred to them as,
a genius, only rises once in a while compared to other forms of selecting a leader. In general
elections it isn't the smart and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Many say the American democratic system which Canada emulates quite closely is the best for all of
the world's countries yet the countries that employ this ideological system can't get half their
population to vote according to the graph presented. At one point in history, governments thought
they had the best ideology for their societies much like modern day democratic governments seem
to think. With the statistics shown by the graph, it makes one think that maybe Democracy isn't the
way, maybe there is a better way for society to be run, or maybe

Athenian Democracy Vs American Democracy Essay
"Riot is the language of the of the unheard."Back around the time 430B.C. democracy was
beginning to be developed. Surprisingly, like all great things it took time and is still taking time to
perfect to this day. Democracy is not a system of government that is unchanging it is, matter of fact,
constantly up for change and perfection. In comparing Athenian and American democracy, they are
very different however some aspects are the same. The similarities include citizens were allowed to
vote for their leader(s). However, the definition of a citizen is completely different now that it was
then. A citizen back then was a male landowner in Athens, on the other hand, citizens now days are
people that are born within the country or have parents ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This also lessens the power of the people within the current democracy and its makes it where if
your elected official does not agree with the law he will not submit the law for debate and passage.
Making the elected official in more of a power position than the people. When democracy was
officially built on the power of the people not the power of high ranking officials, therefore, ruining
the whole point of having a democracy in the first place. Another difference between the two
democracies is that in the Athenian democracy, the people who were able to vote were taught and
given a proper education, unlike today where everyone can vote, whether they are educated or not.
In Athenian time you had to be a boy who was most likely to become a landowner. This eliminated
the chances for advancement in technology significantly and made the process of evolution slow
down even more. Likewise, now days everyone is given an education. Rich, poor, white or black
everyone is given equal opportunity to pursue an education. If they choose to is all up to them. In
conclusion when comparing and contrasting American Democracy today and Athenian Democracy
in 430B.C. there are many similarities and many differences. The effects and outcomes of each
democracy are almost the same. Overall democracy is democracy in the end and deep down it is all
the

Reflection On American Democracy
One of the more complex and broad, in scope, pieces of our studies this semester has been the
research of Gerrymandering. While the essence and defining traits of Gerrymandering are simple in
nature, the complexities of the effects on American democracy and the everyday lives of the citizens
the nation holds are of the most intricate I have personally come across. The astonishing aspect is
not in the act of gerrymandering, no, if that was the case it would be illegal or constantly trying to be
debunked by the majority of the populace. The astonishing facet of this systematic disruptor is the
lack of knowledge and care by the common citizen. The mere acceptance of what they think is
normal is quite bewildering and gives more reason to me why our state of the union is limping at the
knees like it is. I cherish the ways of a republican ran nation, I love the adrenaline of capitalism
alongside economic and social mobility. Yet at my most humane self, I am a liberal at heart who
cherishes the ideals of direct democracy like that of the Athenians in Greece BCE. Growing up and
having a somewhat tangible aspect of voting and outcomes, I had honestly thought that we lived in a
direct democracy where everyone votes and is equal, where nothing was skewed. As I have reached
past years of a pubescent psyche and study into the realities of American democracy the truth is ever
so troubling, not because of the actions but because of hopeful ideas that everything is not skewed
and

Latin American Democracy Essay
Democracy as a form of government is usually exposed to different understanding, interpretations
and even definitions. For some it is the solution and for others it is a problem. It is a term that is a
fundamentally disputed concept–a concept that is at the heart of endless debates that although are
not settled by any kind of argument, are nevertheless continued by all sorts of scholarly evidence.
Democracy is a disputed concept because nearly everyone values the "ideal", yet there are different
legitimate but also incompatible criteria for judging whether the ideal is actually one to strive
towards. In a perfect world, we as comparative thinkers would use concepts that reflect the
uniqueness of each country and yet are simple enough to be relevant and measurable in every
country. In reality and practice, the difficulty of gathering political information usually prevents
scholars from achieving these goals so we tend to settle on concepts that focus on characteristics of
democracy like Robert Dahl in his book, On Democracy, and Sheldon Wolin in his articles "Fugitive
Democracy" and "Norm and Form". These scholars lead us to question why ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
Freedom House ranks on average larger developed countries as less democratic than smaller ones.
Also, a lot of their rankings for flawed democracies are concentrated in Latin America. However,
there has been so much progress in Latin American democratization in recent decades but according
to the source many countries in the area still remain "fragile democracies". We have also noticed
that many rankings don't take into account the relationships and history between western colonizers
and their colonies and the effect that has on modern democratization. Wolin says that we, in the
present have taken many components of democracy for granted and I think there needs to be a call
to restore them or make them more

Pros And Cons Of American Democracy
America is synonymous with the word freedom, even being dubbed "the land of the free" by its own
national anthem. But, what makes America so much more "free" than other countries? Some would
argue that it's America's system of democracy, despite the fact that democratic governments are now
the most common form of rule found in countries around the world. American democracy, although
effective, is not the best democracy style for all nations; because, like many other countries, its
government contains many flaws, including: its low voter turnout, two–party political parties
creating division and deadlock in congress, and government positions of power being bankrolled
and controlled by the rich. As stated previously, there is quite a low number of U.S. voters showing
up to the polls, which damages the efficiency of the American democracy. United States was ranked
31st out 35 countries for number of voter turnout this last August. The last several decades of data
shows only 53 percent of eligible voters showing up for U.S. presidential elections, compared to
Belgium's 87 percent or Turkey's 84 percent voter turnout. The problem with small voter turnout is
summed up by this quote "our legislature is a reflection of our voters, but our voters are not a
reflection of our citizens." As stated by the above quote, the people who are in office are being
chosen by voters, but the people who are voting aren't an accurate representation of the American
population. Most

The American Revolution: Democracy And Monarchy
Since the dawn of the American revolution to the beheading of King Louis XVI, freedom has been
used to describe the transition from control by a monarchy to that of a republic. The connotation of
the suppressive nature of a monarchy by using powerful, positive terms to describe democracy often
results in a lack of belief in the merits of the monarchy. Thus, there arises a desire to ascertain the
unbiased history of democracy and monarchy, and how they truly affect a nation and its citizenry as
well as the parallels these forms of government have to current society. The first monarchs from
Egypt and Mesopotamia to the Roman Empire were considered living gods who held the sacral
power of their subjects, and these rulers, from all corners of the world, created dynasties that lasted
centuries. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
These more parliamentary governments declined in prevalence during the European Middle Ages
but arose once again in 1649 when the Parliament of England overthrow the English monarchy,
which catalyzed the American and French Revolutions. During the nineteenth century a debate
ensued between anti–monarchists and monarchists that has left the world as it is today with a variety
of monarchies, democracies, dictatorships, and autocracies. Empires have flourished under
monarchies but also failed, and the United States was born under a flag of democratic liberty but
experienced both prosperity and defeat, and therefore the process of discerning whether monarchies
or democracies are moralistic, economically, and politically superior is complex and

Definition Of American Democracy
American Democracy
It's hard to define something big as democracy in few short words, but president Abraham Lincoln
does it best by defining democracy as a "Government of the people, by the people, for the people"
(Bleicherstrasse). The Merriam Webster Dictionary barely scratches the surface of what democracy
really means. It tries to define democracy as "a form of government in which people choose leaders
by voting, a country ruled by democracy, an organization or situation in which everyone is treated
equally and has equal rights", but democracy is so much more than that. For a government to be
considered true democracy it must support these four key elements "A political system for choosing
and replacing the government through free and fair elections, the active participation of the people,
as citizens, in politics and civic life, protection of the human rights of all citizens, a rule of law, in
which the laws and procedures apply equally to all citizens" (Diamond, 2004). If we go by this
definition of democracy than America is not consider to be true democracy.
When we look at Merriam Webster Dictionary definition of Democracy, it's far from perfect. It tries
to define democracy as "a form of government in which people choose leaders by voting, a country
ruled by democracy, and an organization or situation in which everyone is treated equally and has
equal rights". By going with this definition it's hard to say the American political system is
democratic when so many

American Democracy Ideal Democracy
American democracy is not ideal democracy. Low voter turnout, excessive sums of money that is
poured into elections, and the increasingly unpopular Electoral College leaves American democracy
from being an ideal, well–functioning democratic electoral system. American democracy, however,
has never been closer to an ideal democracy than it is now. The endless information voters have due
to the Internet allows voters to cast their ballots with more confidence and information than ever
before. More information available to voters means more accountability for elected officials. Voting
has become much easier and accessible than ever before. Absentee ballots and early voting allows
voters to cast their ballots without hassle and on their own time.

Democracy Vs American Democracy
The idea of democracy is the power of the people that they have democratic rights such as the
doctrine of democracy and the freedom of expression. In a complete democratic society, everyone is
born equal. People not only have power in democracy but also have a responsibility to the society.
In addition, democracy relates with Constitutions and election. There are a lot of democracy
societies except the United States. As a democratic country, the United States and Canada have
similar political and rules, but still have differences. Thomas Paine, who was an English–born
American political activist, considered that human beings have two rights which are in–born rights
and civil rights. In–born rights are the foundation of civil rights. And ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The judicial branch is one of the three branches that are independent of the other two branches of the
federal government. For this reason, the independent federal justice system is seen as the key to
ensuring justice and equality for all citizens. The law of America insists on jury system because it is
believed that the constitutional system and the goal of rule of law can be guaranteed by exercising
the jurisdiction of the people. However, sometimes the law put undue emphasis on the procedural
justice that makes a beneficial judgment to the defendant and damage benefit of victims. In an
instance, the case of American football player Simpson in 1994 showed that in the case of sufficient
evidence, due to procedural evidence not being adopted, the two first–degree murder charges were
acquitted. The goal of law should prevent citizens from being infracted their rights. To compare with
the United States, Canada is one of the Commonwealth countries. The queen of British is a nominal
national leader of Canada and the viceroy is a representative of nominal leaders who are appointed
by the Queen. The responsibility of the viceroy includes convene or dissolve parliament, and take
charge of the inauguration ceremony of the prime minister, Supreme Chancellor, cabinet, and Privy
Council. However, in fact, the power of the viceroy is greatly constrained by the

Democracy In American Democracy
American Democracy
Democracies have been around for hundreds of years, dating back before the word democracy was
created by the ancient Greeks. Democracies give the citizens of the nation power and let them have
a say in politics. Also, the people have many freedoms guaranteed to them, unlike other types of
government. The people elect local, state, and national government officials. The local government
deals with many different issues. State government shares most of its power with the national
government. Lastly, the national government oversees all the smaller forms of government in the
land. [Thesis] American Democracy fits the definition of democracy because the people are
represented fairly through local, state, and national government. To begin, local government acts on
behalf on specific areas known as counties, towns, or districts (local government).The people vote
on councilmen to represent our county, town, or city. For example, the councilmen vote on and
determine how much money our school can spend. They can also enact on our county taxes. Local
government cannot pass or enforce laws that might put judgment on a much bigger area other than
its own(local government). For example, if the city tax for Opp is nine cents, they cannot impose
that same tax on a nearby city like Kinston. The citizens have a choice in who they vote for to make
sure we are represented fairly. As a person who makes up a part of the county, district, or town, the
people all

African American Democracy
In 1950, the U.S. census registered approximately 15 million African Americans in the U.S. and
none of them were allowed to vote and barely any of them were treated equally. This caused
activists for African American rights everywhere, such as Langston Hughes, to fight for a proper
democracy and equal rights for all in America. In Langston Hughes's poem from 1949 Democracy,
he says that even though democracy wouldn't come anytime soon, he still knows that it was
inevitable for African Americans to have their voices heard and America will be much closer to
being truly democratic. Ever since the rise of activists in 1950s America, democracy has advanced
significantly. Ever since Hughes's Democracy was written and published there has been dozens of
laws and social changes that further developed America's democracy. Some of the most important
events that caused these changes would include Brown vs. the Board of Education, the Civil Rights
Act of 1964, and the Voting Rights Act of 1965.
Brown vs. the Board of Education changed the way education for colored people was done forever.
Before the court case, almost every school was segregated between whites and blacks; the parents
would get mad if the black kids would use the same bathroom, water fountain, and even the same
school as their white kid. This was made socially acceptable at the time thanks to Jim Crow Laws.
The Jim Crow Laws were a set of rules a majority of the south used to segregate colored people
from white people

Pros And Cons Of Greek Democracy Vs American Democracy
Personally, I think that Greek Democracy was better than American democracy today. There were
problems though. Not everyone could vote in Greece, like women and slaves. But, there was a large
variety of men, and in vote this meant not as many biases because of people of different
backgrounds. In democracy today, we vote for representatives who vote on the problems for us. So,
there isn't as many people, and most of the time, they stay in the same position. Compared to
modern democracy on this level, Greece was good. Our modern democracy also has variety, but in
different ways. We don't have slaves, and women can be representatives. This can help the bias issue
that the Greek's democracy had. Greece had a direct democracy, which meant literally

American Democracy : Is It Unhealthy And Who Is Blame?
American Democracy: Is it Unhealthy and Who is to Blame?
Despite being one of the oldest and most consistently stable democracies in the Western world, the
American government, and American democracy as a whole, has frequently come under fire in
recent years. Whether it is political parties, pundits, bloggers or citizens, Americans and non–
Americans are all lining up to take shots at what they diagnose as a storied democracy crumbling
before their eyes. Two of Robert Dahl's criteria for a healthy democracy are enlightened
understanding: are citizens able to acquire the political information necessary to participate in their
own democracy, and control of the agenda: do the American senators and members of congress have
exclusive and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In terms of how informed American citizens are about their government, it has been well
documented that the majority of the American populace are not well informed about political
goings–on, and have not been for a lengthy period of time. In a 2012 survey issued to 1010
American adults, Pew Research Center found that out of a 12 question survey covering the
American presidential election of that year, American voters were only able to answer 58.2% of the
questions. Only 85% could correctly identify Joe Biden as the current vice president, and only 40%
knew that the Republicans had a majority in Congress (Pew Research Center, 2012, p 1). Even more
alarming was that among the citizens surveyed who were not registered voters, the percentages of
people able to correctly answer these questions fell to 60%, and 22% respectively. While
unregistered voters being unable to vote would certainly mean a drop off between the two groups
ability to answer the question, drop off as large as a quarter of respondents being unable to identify
the vice president is still cause for alarm. In another study conducted by Pew Research Center
comparing American citizens' ability to answer political questions in 1989 and 2007, they concluded
that American ignorance of current events is a systemic problem rather than an emerging one. When
asked to identify the vice president, only 74% of

2000 Dbq African American Democracy
Democracy is the idea government of present day. Many nations are converting to a democratic
image to improve and better their society and make the people have a "fair" government. Today, it
may seem easy to do things such as voting and our own freedom, but the expansion of democracy
back then was a struggle. During 1776– 1920, many attempts were made to expand/ create
democracy to increase citizen participation in the government. Acts for rights for suffrage, equal
rights for the "lower class", women, and African Americans, and balanced government where no one
directly controls the government like the monopolists did, helped form the way democratic
governments are run today. Events such as the Civil War, protests that created amendments and ...
During the late 1700s, women were not seen as being equal to men. They were imaged as one who
stayed at home and took care of the kids. No one ever imagined a woman voting. Some women
actually supported the fight in allowing blacks to vote. During the time the 15th amendment passed,
many women who supported Women's Suffrage were disappointed in which they were excluded in
the idea of allowing "everyone" to vote. Before the Civil War, the movement for Women's Suffrage
started to pick up steam, but had become lost due to the interruption of the Civil War. One of the
acts that stood out the most for Women's Suffrage was the Seneca Falls Conference in 1848. This
was organized by two American activists, Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Lucretia Mott. They were the
first to organize a conference to address Women's rights and issues, and with sixty– eight women
and thirty two men, they signed "The Declaration of Sentiments", a document that was similar to the
Declaration of Independence, but directed towards women's rights. Getting suffrage for women was
not an easy campaign. During 1890– 1919, many states were in a mix on their decision on suffrage
for women. Some agreed with equal suffrage, others partial, and the rest wanted no suffrage at all
for females as displayed in Document 6. Women's Suffrage finally became a reality when it was
ratified as an amendment (19th) in

Theories Of American Democracy
Theories of American Democracy
I believe the pluralism theory best explains the American political process because, it speaks on the
existence of classes, it emphasizes how the larger the group the bigger the influence it will have, and
it is based on power being dispersed. These facts coincide with America's current political process.
To begin analyzing the pluralism theory we have to first take note that it states, most decision
making happens in the framework of the government, but groups will use their resources to
influence these choices.
The existence of political parties and interest groups also adds to the idea of power being
distributed. Having these different classes prevents one group or person from making decisions that
affect all of society. This is primarily how the United States government works, there are different
groups, each one pushing for their own preferences. "...leaders influence the decisions of
constituents, but the decisions of leaders are also determined in part by what they think they are, will
be, or have been the preferences of their constituents." (Dahl, 90) The political parties will state
what they will change, if we were to vote for them, this is how they influence our decisions. We all
want whoever is in charge to have the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Therefore if the majority of the population sides with one party, it dramatically influences the votes.
"In the apolitical strata, people are notably less calculating; their political choices are more strongly
influenced by inertia, habit, unexamined loyalties, personal attachments, emotions, transient
impulses." (Dahl, 90) There are many citizens that will continuously vote for the same party out of
commitment. In America many do not notice that when election time comes around, the candidate's
preferences differ. The person whom they were rooting for way back when, does not share the exact
same priorities as the current runner

Citizens Role In American Democracy
In an American democracy, every citizen in the United States plays a role.
Without citizens playing a role, society would become dysfunctional and unfair. For example, public
decisions would be solely decided by government officials and without any input or viewpoints
from the citizens. Therefore, it is crucial that every citizen executes due diligence in pursuing their
roles. The role of a citizen in an American democracy is to express their civic duties, respect the
rights given by the government, be involved with intermediaries, and be open–minded to the media
because citizen participation allows the country to develop economically and socially in the future.
As an American citizen, one is responsible for many tasks and duties for everyday ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
For example, interest groups, "a group of people who share common goals and organize to influence
the government", can bring about this change. (503, Interest Group Organization). In addition,
interest groups, "try to influence government officials to support certain policies" (504, Defining
Interest Groups). Therefore, the interest groups' purpose is to support policies citizens are concerned
about. Citizens should engage with interest groups because they connect the gap between the people
and the government. Groups, who are made of citizens, spend countless hours and money to bring
change to the public by influencing government officials and bringing attention to them. Similar to
our Generation Citizen, where together as a class, reached out to city council and our citizen targets
to educate the public about the effects of addiction of e–cigs. Interest groups are effective at building
relationships with government officials and using funding to draft bills for approval by the
government. Engagement is an important role for a citizen because within interest groups, citizens
are able to communicate their desires to government officials and protect the well–being of the
citizens of America. Furthermore citizens join interest groups to, "protect or promote their economic
self–interest... get their beliefs translated into policy" (505, Leadership and Membership). Thus, by
joining an interest group, citizens are more likely to get what they desire. For example, union
workers are part of interest groups that include labor unions and together, by gathering workers
together, they are able to stride for higher wages or better benefits. Another intermediary that
engages with citizens are lobbyists. In the textbook it states that, "lobbyists are representatives of
interest groups who make direct contact with lawmakers" (508, The Work of

American Democracy: The Great Deceit
American Democracy: The Great Deceit
James A. Byrnes
Colorado Springs Early Colleges
Political Science
Ashish Vaidya
Due: May 15, 2017
In recent years, and especially in the time following the recent election, many Americans –
especially Bernie Sanders and the like – have furthered the ideology that America is becoming an
oligarchy. Founding father Thomas Jefferson once said, "The end of democracy and the defeat of the
American Revolution will occur when government falls into the hands of lending institutions and
moneyed incorporations." Because American politics are so heavily influenced by money, social
status and media attention, I believe that we are closer to a complete oligarchical political system
than ever before. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Unfortunately, no matter how good the intent of those running for positions of leadership, whether
in their community or in the national government, politics have a way of corrupting or
inconveniencing even the most upstanding of citizens. For instance, when Congress is presented
with a bill to vote upon, each senator and representative must not only vote based upon their
personal ideology in regards to the bill, but must also consider other factors such as support from
their constituents and even support of the president. It slowly gravitates from a decision based upon
what they believe, to a decision based upon how badly they want to risk their position of power in
the government. This is the very essence of a flawed democracy! This is the very reason why
rhetoric and deceit and empty promises enter politics. Members of the government lose their
ideological convictions and give into the mindset of megalomaniacs. Elected officials get so caught
up in the "politics", that they ignore any idea of compromise and solution, and stubbornly hold to
their party's stance on issues, doing anything to keep their seat. The willingness to compromise –
something critical to the success of democratic government – has collapsed; the most likely
explanation being the growing confidence, arrogance even, of the defenders of inequality and
oligarchy. They believe they are winning and see no need for compromise. And that view, which
may be tactically accurate, destabilizes the unending cooperation between conservatives and liberals
that democracy

American Democracy
Democracy is a "system of government in which political authority vested in the people" (Ch. 1, Pg.
4). Democracy is by far the most challenging form of government, for perhaps both politicians and
the people. The term democracy comes from a Greek term which in short means "rule by the
people". The antique democracies in ancient cities, such as Rome and Athens, represent precursors
of modern democracies. Like modern democracy, the need for organized rule arose in the midst of
power abuse. The democracy we abide by today was created in the 17th century during the Age of
Enlightenment, by philosophers such as John Locke, Voltaire... These philosophers created the
foundation for our modern democracy. These essential elements such as the separation ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Elitism is a stress on material power. Those who have resources must be successful and rightful
rulers, or else that resource would not have gotten into their possession. Superiority in the elites is
the premise for the Elite Theory. Whoever has achieved must be of a higher mental capacity, and
therefore are the only ones who are worthy of a position of power. To Elitists, the common people
are common due to a lack of superiority. Elitism recognizes the need for people to be governed, and
decides that elitists should rule because of all the material power around, they have the most, and
therefore have the most to be lost in the event of an unsuccessful social contract. By making those
with the most possession the ones in power, it is theorized that there will be order due to the elites
keeping it together in order to sustain their foothold in

Essay On Latin American Democracy
Democracy has been struggling to make an appearance in several places in the world. The Latin
American countries in particular, have all been led by some form of a military–run government. In
all three countries including Brazil, Argentina, and Mexico, democracy has taken a long time to
catch on. Although even today, their democracies aren't perfect, they all have made an effort to make
the switch. There are many similarities and differences that the roles of the military in the
governments of Brazil, Mexico, and Argentina played. One of the first differences was how they
came to power. Brazil's president had been driven out of power, Mexico's military government was
simply elected at first, while Argentina's military forced their leader into exile. In Brazil, they had
three popularly voted presidents in a row. The last president they had prior to the seizure of the
government was named Juscelino Kubitschek. His goal for Brazil was to increase and develop the
economy. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Free elections need to take place, citizens need to take part in working towards the well–being of
their nation, and all people need to be seen as equals. Democracy also takes a lot of time to develop
and catch on in many countries. Latin America faced many obstacles that democracy faced in this
region of the world. The first biggest obstacle was the powerful militaries. They were so powerful
that it didn't take them much to gain power and then keep control of it. In many countries including
Brazil and Argentina, the military harshly took control, driving the previous leaders out of office and
into exile. People and citizens weren't initially strong enough to oppose the military because of their
great strength. Not to mention, if you opposed them you would most likely be jailed, tortured, and
even possibly executed. People weren't given the freedoms they needed for a democracy to be

The Natural Rights Of American Democracy
American democracy is a government which whom the power is vested by the people.
The United States government has fulfilled the American democracy however, there has been major
fulfilments that have not been completed. The start to our democracy begin with our Enlightenment
ideas which influenced our founding fathers. These ideas dealt with Natural Rights, Social Contract,
and Revolution. The Natural Rights idea comes from a famous philosopher named John Locke. He
basically states that every human has certain rights that are not given to them by the government and
those rights that aren 't mentioned are called Natural Rights. This idea was put into effect with the
9th Amendment, this Amendment means there are other rights that may exist aside from the ones
directly mentioned in the constitution, and even though they are not mention it doesn 't mean that
they cannot be violated. Another Enlightenment idea is the social contract. The idea is brought upon
a mixture of both John Locke and Jean – Jacques Rousseau. This idea states that the government and
the people of the country are in a contract with one another, the government protects the people and
the people obey and allow the government to govern. This is a give and take Enlightenment idea
which was thought to be on of the basic ideas for having a democracy. Another very important
Enlightenment idea is the Revolution idea also inspired by John Locke. This idea argued that if the
government failed to protect our natural

The Five Theories Of American Democracy

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Sandy Harwell

More from Sandy Harwell (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

The Five Theories Of American Democracy