Rajasthan housing shortage and conditions rural vs urban
•
4 likes•699 views
rajasthan census data is compiled and a comparision of rural vs urban is shown
Recommended
More Related Content
What's hot
What's hot (20)
Viewers also liked
More from Sandeep Kumar
More from Sandeep Kumar (10)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
Rajasthan housing shortage and conditions rural vs urban
- 1. RAJASTHAN A COMPARISION OF RURAL AND URBAN HOUSING STATISTICS SANDEEP KUMAR | 2140200168 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SCHOOL OF PLANNING AND ARCHITECTURE VIJAYAWADA
- 2. PAGE 1 Contents Introduction........................................................................................................................2 Number of Census Houses...............................................................................................3 Households by condition of census house....................................................................3 Distribution of occupied census houses by use ...........................................................4 Distribution of occupied census houses by Predominant material of roof..............6 Distribution of occupied census houses by Predominant material of wall..............7 Distribution of occupied census houses by Predominant material of floor.............9 Distribution of Households Having Number of Dwelling Rooms...............................10 Distribution of Households by ownership Status of the Census Houses Occupied by Them............................................................................................................................11 Distribution of Households by Source of Drinking Water...........................................12 Distribution of Households by Location of Drinking Water........................................13 Distribution of Households by availability of kitchen facility.....................................14 Distribution of Households by bathing facility.............................................................15 Distribution of Households by type of latrine facility..................................................16 Distribution of Households by type of drainage connectivity for waste water outlet.................................................................................................................................17 Distribution of Households by main source of lighting ..............................................18 Distribution of Households by fuel used for cooking..................................................19 Distribution of Households by Households availing banking services.....................20 Distribution of households by Houseless Population..................................................21 Distribution of households by Housing Shortage........................................................22 ...........................................................................................................................................22 Distribution of households by Type of housing unit....................................................23 Observations from the above given comparison of Urban and rural housing Statistics ............................................................................................................................24 Policies and Schemes for housing in Rajasthan .........................................................26
- 3. PAGE 2 Introduction Study Area Rajasthan Area 342,239 square kilometers Population 74,791,568 Number of housholds 12,581,303 Literacy 67% HDI 0.5768 State Agencies responsible for housing and other facilities Rajasthan housing board Rajasthan PHED
- 4. PAGE 3 Number of Census Houses Rural Urban Total Number of census houses 18,070,963 13,296,654 31,367,617 Number of vacant census houses 1,846,993 1,203,878 3,050,871 Number of occupied census house 16,223,970 12,092,776 28,316,746 Source: Census of India 2011(Series-H: Tables on Houses, Household Amenities and Assets) Households by condition of census house Households by condition of census house Rural Urban Total Good 4,282,448 2,129,718 6,412,166 Livable 4,774,582 905,312 5,679,894 Dilapidated 433,333 55,910 489,243 Total 9,490,363 3,090,940 12,581,303 Rural - Vacant 6% Rural - Occupie d 52% Urban - Vacant 4% Urban - Vacant 38% 58% 42% Rural census houses Urban census house vacant census houses 10% occupied census house 90%
- 5. PAGE 4 Distribution of occupied census houses by use Rural Urban Total Occupied Census Houses used as Res 9,173,665 2,966,028 12,139,693 Residence -cum- other use 259,689 103,044 362,733 Shop/ Office 491,247 633,681 1,124,928 School/ College etc. 109,798 21,636 131,434 Hotel/ Lodge/ Guest house etc. 24,353 13,262 37,615 Hospital/ Dispensary etc. 26,432 10,217 36,649 Factory/ Workshop/ Workshed etc. 52,721 58,761 111,482 Place of worship 187,799 36,470 224,269 Other non-residential use 1,738,128 245,903 1,984,031 No. of occupied locked census houses 28,944 42,192 71,136 Total number of occupied census houses 12,092,776 4,131,194 16,223,970 75% 25% Rural Urban Good 45% Livable 50% Dilapidated 5% Good 69% Livable 29% Dilapidated 2% Source: HH-1 Households By The Condition Of Census Houses Occupied By Them Distribution of census houses Rural Urban
- 6. PAGE 5 Occupied Census Houses used as Res 76% Residence -cum- other use 2% Shop/ Office 4% School/ College etc. 1% Hotel/ Lodge/ Guest house etc. 0% Hospital/ Dispensary etc. 0% Factory/ Workshop/ Workshed etc. 1% Place of worship 2% Other non-residential use 14% No. of occupied locked census houses 0% Rural Urban Occupied Census Houses used as Res 72% Residence -cum- other use 3% Shop/ Office 15% School/ College etc. 1% Hotel/ Lodge/ Guest house etc. 0% Hospital/ Dispensary etc. 0% Factory/ Workshop/ Workshed etc. 1% Place of worship 1% Other non- residential use 6% No. of occupied locked census houses 1% Source: census 2011 Number of occupied census houses by use Source: census 2011 Number of occupied census houses by use
- 7. PAGE 6 Distribution of occupied census houses by Predominant material of roof Rural Urban Total Grass/ Thatch/ Bamboo/ Wood/ Mud, etc 2060434 121763 2182197 Plastic/ Polythene 41748 15160 56908 Hand made Tiles 1677868 52647 1730515 Machine made Tiles 301277 28035 329312 Burnt Brick 502021 206073 708094 Stone/Slate 5918405 2259918 8178323 G.I./ Metal/ Asbestos sheets 782466 217173 999639 Concrete 715675 1168773 1884448 Any other material 63938 19460 83398 Total 12063832 4089002 16152834 Grass/ Thatch/ Bamboo/ Wood/ Mud, et 17% Plastic/ Polythene 0% Hand made Tiles 14% Machine made Tiles 3% Burnt Brick 4% Stone/Slate 49% G.I./ Metal/ Asbestos sheets 6% Concrete 6% Any other material 1% Rural Source: census 2011 Number of occupied census houses by by Predominant material of roof
- 8. PAGE 7 Distribution of occupied census houses by Predominant material of wall Rural Urban Total Grass/ Thatch/ Bamboo etc. 403385 20960 424345 Plastic/ Polythene 18405 6066 24471 Mud/ Unburnt brick 3089906 179109 3269015 Wood 70605 12678 83283 Stone not packed with mortar 875259 250669 1125928 Stone packed with mortar 4775445 1451075 6226520 G.I./ Metal/ Asbestos sheets 14789 10980 25769 Burnt brick 2746728 2095202 4841930 Concrete 26657 37713 64370 Any other material 42653 24550 67203 Total 12063832 4089002 16152834 Grass/ Thatch/ Bamboo/ Wood/ Mud, et 3% Plastic/ Polythene 0% Hand made Tiles 1% Machine made Tiles 1%Burnt Brick 5% Stone/Slate 55% G.I./ Metal/ Asbestos sheets 5% Concrete 29% Any other material 1% Urban Source: census 2011 Number of occupied census houses by by Predominant material of roof
- 9. PAGE 8 Grass/ Thatch/ Bamboo etc. 1% Plastic/ Polythene 0% Mud/ Unburnt brick 4% Wood 0% Stone not packed with mortar 6% Stone packed with mortar 36% G.I./ Metal/ Asbestos sheets 0% Burnt brick 51% Concrete 1% Any other material 1% Urban Grass/ Thatch/ Bamboo etc. 3% Plastic/ Polythene 0% Mud/ Unburnt brick 26% Wood 1%Stone not packed with mortar 7% Stone packed with mortar 40% G.I./ Metal/ Asbestos sheets 0% Burnt brick 23% Concrete 0% Any other material 0% Rural Source: census 2011 Number of occupied census houses by by Predominant material of wall Source: census 2011 Number of occupied census houses by by Predominant material of wall
- 10. PAGE 9 Distribution of occupied census houses by Predominant material of floor Rural Urban Total Mud 42185 310782 352967 Wood/ Bamboo 24589 7123 31712 Burnt Brick 247157 85981 333138 Stone 1087608 1122000 2209608 Cement 4344876 1990052 6334928 Mosaic/ Floor tiles 287696 546360 834056 Any other material 41891 26704 68595 Total 6076002 4089002 10165004 Mud 8% Wood/ Bamboo 0% Burnt Brick 2% Stone 27% Cement 49% Mosaic/ Floor tiles 13% Any other material 1% Rural Urban Mud 1% Wood/ Bamboo 0% Burnt Brick 4% Stone 18% Cement 71% Mosaic/ Floor tiles 5% Any other material 1% Source: census 2011 Number of occupied census houses by by Predominant material of floor Source: census 2011 Number of occupied census houses by by Predominant material of floor
- 11. PAGE 10 Distribution of Households Having Number of Dwelling Rooms No exclusive room One room Two rooms Three rooms Four rooms Five rooms Six rooms and above Total Rural 342090 3623447 2938721 1216380 732513 300703 336509 9490363 Urban 50864 799602 898278 584320 408119 164824 184933 3090940 Total 392954 4423049 3836999 1800700 1140632 465527 521442 12581303 Source: census 2011 Number of Households Having Number of Dwelling Rooms No exclusive room 4% One room 38% Two rooms 31% Three rooms 13% Four rooms 8% Five rooms 3% Six rooms and above 3% Rural Urban Source: census 2011 Number of Households Having Number of Dwelling Rooms No exclusive room 2% One room 26% Two rooms 29% Three rooms 19% Four rooms 13% Five rooms 5% Six rooms and above 6%
- 12. PAGE 11 Distribution of Households by ownership Status of the Census Houses Occupied by Them Owned Rented Total Rural 9228745 150628 9379373 Urban 2499269 523159 3022428 Total 11728014 673787 12401801 Source: census 2011 Number of Households Having Number of Dwelling Rooms Source: census 2011 Number of Households Having Number of Dwelling Rooms Owned 98% Rented 2% Rural Urban Owned 83% Rented 17%
- 13. PAGE 12 Distribution of Households by Source of Drinking Water Tap water from treated source Tap water from un- treated source Total Covered well Un- covered well Total Hand pump Tubewell/ Borehole Spring River/ Canal Tank/ Pond/ Lake Other sources Total Rural 4031112 1074765 5105877 151778 1209912 1361690 3178087 1537886 9213 1E+05 737588 545324 19048870 Urban 1700602 853493 2554095 135360 1179355 1314715 2988588 1365468 7982 1E+05 687267 470222 13359173 Total 5731714 1928258 7659972 287138 2389267 2676405 6166675 2903354 17195 2E+05 1424855 1015546 32408043 Source: census 2011 Number of Households by Source of Drinking Water Tap water from treated source 18% Tap water from un-treated source 9% Covered well 1%Un-covered well 13%Hand pump 32% Tubewell/ Borehole 14% Spring 0% River/ Canal 1% Tank/ Pond/ Lake 7% Other sources 5% Tap water from treated source 32% Tap water from un- treated source 9%Covered well 1%Un-covered well 10% Hand pump 25% Tubewell/ Borehole 12% Spring 0% River/ Canal 1% Tank/ Pond/ Lake 6% Other sources 4% Source: census 2011 Number of Households by Source of Drinking Water Urban Rural
- 14. PAGE 13 Distribution of Households by Location of Drinking Water Within premises Near premises Away Total Rural 21 47.1 31.9 100 Urban 78.2 14.1 7.7 100 Source: census 2011 Number of Households by Location of Drinking Water Source: census 2011 Number of Households by Location of Drinking Water Within premises 21% Near premises 47% Away 32% Within premises 78% Near premises 14% Away 8% Urban Rural
- 15. PAGE 14 Distribution of Households by availability of kitchen facility Cooking inside house Cooking outside house No cooking Total Has Kitchen Does not have kitchen Total Has Kitchen Does not have kitchen Total Rural 3526112 4379233 7905345 529626 1040459 1570085 14933 9490363 Urban 2303209 654322 2957531 35361 85541 120902 12507 3090940 Total 5829321 5033555 10862876 564987 1126000 1690987 27440 12581303 Source: census 2011 Number of Households by availability of kitchen facility Source: census 2011 Number of Households by availability of kitchen facility Has Kitchen 39% Does not have kitchen 49% Does not have kitchen 12% No cooking 0% Has Kitchen 75% Does not have kitchen 22% Does not have kitchen 3% No cooking 0% Urban Rural
- 16. PAGE 15 Distribution of Households by bathing facility Bathroom Enclosure without roof No Bathroom Total Rural 2180418 2048688 5261257 9490363 Urban 2450425 306019 334496 3090940 Total 4630843 2354707 5595753 12581303 Bathroom 23% Enclosure without roof 22% No Bathroom 55% Source: census 2011 Number of Households by bathing facility Rural Source: census 2011 Number of Households by bathing facility Bathroom 79% Enclosure without roof 10% No Bathroom 11% Urban
- 17. PAGE 16 Distribution of Households by type of latrine facility Piped sewer system Septic tank Other system Total With slab/ ventilat ed improv ed pit Without slab/ open pit Total Night soil dispose d into open drain Night soil remove d by human Night soil service d by animals Total Public latrine Open Total Rural 1864447 112488 930673 157322 1200483 374054 274406 648460 10069 772 4663 15504 46062 7579854 7625916 Urban 2535241 792252 1409975 74845 2277072 131941 36318 168259 83992 1800 4118 89910 40479 515220 555699 No Latrine within the premisesLatrine facility within the premise s Water Closet Pit Latrine Other Latrine Source: census 2011 Number of Households by type of latrine facility Source: census 2011 Number of Households by type of latrine facility Latrine facility within the premises 17% Piped sewer system 1% Septic tank 8% Other system 1% With slab/ ventilated improved pit 3% Without slab/ open pit 3% Night soil disposed into open drain 0% L3Night soil removed by human 0% Night soil serviced by animals 0%Public latrine 0% Open 67% Rural Latrine facility within the premises 45% Piped sewer system 14% Septic tank 25% Other system 1% With slab/ ventilated improved pit 2% Without slab/ open pit 1% Night soil disposed into open drain 2% L3Night soil removed by human 0% Night soil serviced by animals 0% Public latrine 1% Open 9% Urban
- 18. PAGE 17 Distribution of Households by type of drainage connectivity for waste water outlet Closed drainage Open drainage No drainage Total Rural 282046 2284240 6924077 9490363 Urban 1064468 1594931 431541 3090940 Total 1346514 3879171 7355618 12581303 Source: census 2011 Number of Households by type of drainage connectivity for waste water outlet Rural Source: census 2011 Number of Households by type of drainage connectivity for waste water outlet Closed drainage 34% Open drainage 52% No drainage 14% Urban
- 19. PAGE 18 Distribution of Households by main source of lighting Electricity Kerosene Solar Other oil Any other No lighting Total Rural 5528360 3729431 75583 36127 29467 91395 9490363 Urban 2901680 159274 2629 4712 8655 13990 3090940 Total 8430040 3888705 78212 40839 38122 105385 12581303 Source: census 2011 Number of Households by main source of lighting Source: census 2011 Number of Households by main source of lighting Electricity 58% Kerosene 39% Solar 1% Other oil 1% Any other 0% No lighting 1% Rural Electricity 94% Kerosene 5% Solar 0% Other oil 0% Any other 0% No lighting 1% Urban
- 20. PAGE 19 Distribution of Households by fuel used for cooking Fire- wood Crop residue Cow- dung cake Coal, Lignite, Charcoal Kerosene LPG/ PNG Electricity Bio- gas Any other No cooking Total Rural 7056759 1323176 322150 5461 23567 728987 2972 6928 5430 14933 9490363 Urban 719926 58591 50570 8278 88533 2144327 822 5217 2169 12507 3090940 Total 7776685 1381767 372720 13739 112100 2873314 3794 12145 7599 27440 12581303 Source: census 2011 Number of Households by fuel used for cooking Fire-wood 74% Crop residue 14% Cowdung cake 4% Coal, Lignite, Charcoal 0% Kerosene 0% LPG/ PNG 8% Electicity 0% Bio-gas 0% Any other 0% No cooking 0% Source: census 2011 Number of Households by fuel used for cooking Fire-wood 23% Crop residue 2% Cowdung cake 2% Coal, Lignite, Charcoal 0% Kerosene 3% LPG/ PNG 69% Electicity 0% Bio-gas 0% Any other 0% No cooking 1% Rural Urban
- 21. PAGE 20 Distribution of Households by Households availing banking services Availing Not Availing Total Rural 6473837 3016526 9490363 Urban 2083985 1006955 3090940 Total 8557822 4023481 12581303 Source: census 2011 Number of Households by Households availing banking services Source: census 2011 Number of Households by Households availing banking services Availing 68% Not Availing 32% Rural Urban Availing 67% Not Availing 33%
- 22. PAGE 21 Distribution of households by Houseless Population Houseless Having House Total Rural 108308 9382055 9490363 Urban 73236 3017704 3090940 Total 181544 12399759 12581303 Source: census 2011 Number of Households by Houseless Population Source: census 2011 Number of Households by Houseless Population Houseless 1% Having House 99% Rural Urban Houseless 2% Having House 98%
- 23. PAGE 22 Distribution of households by Housing Shortage People living in Non Serviceable kutcha house Obsolescent houses Congested houses Homeless condition Total Rural 1258236 1949998 1768293 108308 3826599 Urban 54018 251595 19903720 73236 20228551 Total 1312254 2201593 21672013 181544 25367404 Non Servicable katcha house 25% Obsolecent houses 38% Congested houses 35% Homeless condition 2% Non Servicable katcha house 0% Obsolecent houses 1% Congested houses 98% Homeless condition 1% Source: census 2011 Number of Households by Housing Shortage Source: census 2011 Number of Households by Housing Shortage Rural Urban
- 24. PAGE 23 Distribution of households by Type of housing unit Permanent Semi- Permanent Temporary TotalServiceable Non-Serviceable Total Rural 6,146,700 1,873,913 1,116,964 279,608 1,396,572 9,417,185 Urban 2,844,418 150,014 54,817 12,004 66,821 3,061,253 Total 8,991,118 2,023,927 1,171,781 291,612 1,463,393 12,478,438 Source: census 2011 Number of Households by Type of housing unit Source: census 2011 Number of Households by Type of housing unit Rural Urban Permanent 65% Semi Permanent 20% Temporary Serviceable 12% Temporary Non- Serviceable 3% Permanent 93% Semi Permanent 5% Temporary Serviceable 2% Temporary Non- Serviceable 0%
- 25. PAGE 24 Observations from the above given comparison of Urban and rural housing Statistics Wide disparity can be seen in the housing conditions of Rural and Urban Areas In rural areas there is a large share of Obsolescent and Non serviceable kutcha houses whereas in urban areas congestion is a big contributor to the housing shortage. Further the Share of Non-Permanent houses in Rural areas is high as compared to urban areas it is because of prevalence of Traditional housing in rural areas also people prefer to build houses of mud and thatch housing owing to the extreme climatic condition in Rajasthan. Whereas in urban areas the share of concrete as a building material is high. The main source of Fuel used for cooking is Fire-wood in rural areas and lighting it is electricity followed by kerosene whereas in urban areas the major fuel used in kitchen is LPG and in lighting it is Majorly Electricity. Open defecation is still a big problem in rural areas due to lack of both in premise latrine facility and public latrines also, the existing Latrines have to depend majorly on Septic tanks no piped sewer Drainage Facility is available, the drainage is either not available or there are majorly it is open leading to health related problems. Whereas in urban areas there is high availability of in premise larine facility and public toilets still open defecation is not completely eradicated further the Piped sewer system still is not able to fully cater and people have to build septic tanks, the Drainage availability is high as compared to rural areas is very high but still the share of open drainage is more than half of the total drainage. Bathrooms in rural areas are still a luxury as less than half of the total households are having bathroom, Available bathrooms are structure majorly without a roof , Whereas in Urban areas bathrooms are accessible to nearly 90% population, out of which 10% are without roof. These figures are comparatively better than rural figures. In rural areas kitchen availability is very low in most of the areas and more cooking is also done out of the house whereas in urban areas kitchen is more available as compared to the rural areas.
- 26. PAGE 25 Availability of Drinking Water is very having very Shocking Disparities between urban and rural areas. Sources of water are similar in urban and rural areas, but people in rural areas have to travel more in order to get it, as compared to urban areas where availability of drinking water within permises is very high. The share of non-residential use of houses such as shops and offices is high in urban areas. The Share of rented housing is high in urban areas as compared to Rural areas Due to the migration and Floating population in the Urban areas.
- 27. PAGE 26 Policies and Schemes for housing in Rajasthan - Policies o Affordable Housing on PPP model – Policy 2009 (Focus on EWS and LIG Housing) o Project of Mass Housing o Mukhyamantri Shahri BPL Awas Yojana AFFORDABLE HOUSING POLICY ‐ 2009 Rajasthan Avas Vikas & Infrastructure Limited was appointed as Nodal Agency for implementation of the projects under Affordable Housing Policy-2009 . Phase 1 S.No Location No. of Schemes Project Cost EWS LIG MIG Total 1 Jaipur 8 19797.6 3344 1616 816 5776 2 Chaksu 1 5975.6 1104 648 128 1880 3 Ajmer 1 2024 240 192 104 536 4 Dausa 1 1465.6 224 128 64 416 5 Kuchaman City 1 2822.4 496 256 96 848 6 Bhiwadi 2 2728.8 432 272 96 800 Total 14 34814 5840 3112 1304 10256 Phase 2
- 28. PAGE 27 SAHBHAGITA AWAS YOJANA (UNDER AFFORDABLE HOUSING POLICY 2009) - launched to promote EWS/LIG housing through private participation. - Initial target of over 1,25,000 houses for EWS, LIG and MIG category to be constructed. - Target revised upwards to 5.0 lakhs houses looking to over whelming response from private developers. Mega Housing Scheme (Affordable Housing) For allotment of houses to the urban poor in various towns of Rajasthan, Govt. of Rajasthan launched Mega Housing Scheme. Under this scheme, the land for construction shall be made available by the local bodies (Nagar Palika, Nagar Nigam, UIT, Jodhpur Development Authority). Rajasthan Avas Vikas & Infrastructure has been appointed as Nodal Agency for implementation of this scheme by State Government. The process for implementation of this scheme has been started for Jodhpur, Udaipur, Balotra and Sardarshahar . DEDICATED HOUSING FINANCE COMPANY FOR RAJASTHAN Joint venture of IFCI, NHB AND STATE GOVT. To provide easy housing loan to persons with income group of 8000 – 20,000 per month.Micro financing companies to be involved for housing loan to persons with lesser income.
- 29. PAGE 28 Models - Model No. 1: Mandatory Provisions o Schemes of Rajasthan Housing Board – Minimum 50% plots / houses / flats of EWS / LIG category & 20% of the plots/ houses / flats in MIG‐ A category. o Schemes of Urban Local Bodies – Minimum 25% plots / houses / flats of EWS / LIG & 20% of the plots/ houses / flats in MIG‐A category. o Schemes of Private developers‐ 15% of no of plots in case of a township & 5% of the FAR in case of group housing for EWS / LIG. Incentive of 0.50 Additional FAR for EWS / LIG housing o Split locations is allowed with proportionate increase in number of houses / flats in ratio of DLC rates of the two areas to max. 3 times. o Developers reluctant to build EWS/LIG flats in core area schemes and split location resulting in more numbers of flats for EWS / LIG categories. - Model No. 2: Private Developers on Private Land o Selected developers to take up construction of EWS/LIG/MIG‐A flats (G+2/G+3 format) on minimum 40% of the total land for EWS/LIG & 12% for MIG A. o Built up EWS/LIG/MIG‐A flats to be handed over to the nodal agency (Rajasthan Avas Vikas & Infrastructure Limited) at pre‐ determined prices, to be allotted to the eligible beneficiaries. o Developer free to construct MIG‐B/HIG flats on remaining land. o Several incentives offered to developers. - Model No. 3: Private Developers on Land Under Acquisition . o ULBs to identify private lands for acquisition and set apart for construction of houses to the developer cost of acquisition +10% shall be payable by the selected developer o Land owners whose lands already under acquisition for residential schemes of Development Authorities / UITs /ULBs. may be used for creation of stock under Affordable Housing Policy like in Model No.2. o 52% of the land will be used for EWS/LIG/ MIG‐A as per Model No: 2 of the policy remaining 48% land allowed to be used for HIG and other category of flats.
- 30. PAGE 29 - Model No. 4: Private developers on Government Land (For Rental housing or outright sale basis) o The ULBs to offer Government Land for construction of EWS/LIG flats through open bidding process. o Land is offered free of cost but the bidding parameter is the maximum number of flats offered by the bidder o The developer offering the maximum Flats is awarded the project. - Model No. 5: Slum Housing on PPP Model o To encourage PPP Model for Slum Redevelopment. o Slum Development Policy issued by the State Government on 22.08.2012. o Slums situated on Govt. land as well as on private lands can be taken up for Redevelopment. o Swiss Challenge model also allowed – developer who makes the project and gives his offer to Govt will have the first right of refusal after bids have been invited o Several incentives – FAR 4.0 (TDR Facility also available), Commercial 10%, High rise permitted on developers segment o FAR – DOUBLE OF THE PERMISSIBLE FAR, FACILITY OF TDR AS PER TDR POLICY, 0.5 ADDITIONAL FAR FOR TIMELY COMPLETION OF PROJECT o COMPLETE WAIVER OF ‐ o EXTERNAL DEVELOPMENT CHARGES, o BUILDING PLAN APPROVAL FEES, o CONVERSION CHARGES o COMMERCIAL USE UPTO 10% OF PLOT AREA o FAST TRACK APPROVAL OF THE PROJECT – WITHIN 30 DAYS o BUY BACK OF THE FLATS BY THE NODAL AGENCY OF THE STATE GOVT. AT PRE‐DETERMINED PRICE i.e. Rs 750/‐ per sq ft ON SUPER o BUILT UP AREA for EWS/LIG & Rs 1000/‐ per sq ft for MIG‐A (Price revised to Rs 850.00 per sq ft looking to extra ordinary rise in construction cost) o (Indirect benefit of Value appreciation of remaining 48% land and also of land falling in the close proximity of the projects)
- 31. PAGE 30 - FINANCING MODEL IN THE POLICY o RAJASTHAN AVAS VIKAS & INFRASTRUCTURE o LIMITED – Nodal agency for implementation of the policy o HFC’s/Banksinvolved for loan to the beneficiaries. o Escrow account between Local body ‐ Developer ‐ Beneficiary ‐ To ensure Stagewise o Payment to developer o VAT exemption – Reimbursement approved o Allotment/lease deed of the flat‐directly mortgaged to the bank. o Extra comfort to the banks by ULBs in case of default ‐ possession of the flat to be taken & re‐allotted to next beneficiary. ROLE OF NGO’s - Identification of beneficiary (footpath dwellers, taxi & rikshaw dwellers, etc.) - Information to the beneficiary about government’s Affordable Housing Initiatives. - Helping him/her in filing of application form for allotment and in all after procedures like giving information about dues, registry and procurement of housing loans from Bank. House loan under ISHUP being sanctioned by the Banks - Providing information about Self Employment Schemes.
- 32. PAGE 31 BENEFITS TO THE ALLOTTEES • Land Cost ‐ nil • Ceiling cost of EWS flats ‐ Rs. 2.40 lacs (Revised 2.75 lacs) • Ceiling cost of LIG flats ‐ Rs. 3.75 lacs (Revised 4.25 lacs) • Super Builtup area of EWS ‐ 325 Sqft (2 rooms, kitchen, WC, bath) • Super Builtup area of LIG ‐ 500 Sqft (3 rooms, kitchen, WC, bath) • Super Builtup area of MIG‐A ‐ 700 Sqft (2 BHK Flat) • Bank loan to be made available to Beneficiaries • Stamp Duty for EWS flat ‐ Rs. 10.00 per flat (8% earlier) • Stamp Duty for LIG flat ‐ Rs.25.00 per flat. • SUBSIDY OF Rs 12,500/ FLAT APPROVED BY GOI FOR JAIPUR CITY PROJECTS UNDER “AFFORDABLE HOUSING IN PARTNERSHIP” OF GOI, TO BE TRANSFERRED TO BENEFICIARIES. • Scheme of Swarn Jayanti Rojgar Yojana for Women.