Rapple "Scholarly Communications and the Sustainable Development Goals"
Nordforsk - meso-pedagogy and tools.ppt
1. Teaching with technologies - tools for empowering teachers - PBL as a meso-pedagogy Marianne Georgsen Thomas Ryberg E-Learning Lab – center for user driven innovation, learning and design Department of communication and psychology – Aalborg University
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11. DIVERSITY OF PRACTICE – ‘MODELS’ Adapted from Xiangyun Du Problem Process Team Assessment Role of teaching Aalborg One semester Problems(5 months) - open and narrow Project Management and process skills 4-7 Ss Self-form, Discussing, writing and together, Individual judgement in a team based exam Facilitation based – Consultancy (low level Of instruction) Maastricht One week - Case based Seven jumps 5-10 Ss Discussing together Individual exam progress Testing Facilitation based –tutoring (low level of instruction) Republic Polytechnic One day -structured 3 meetings a day – Problem Solving process 5 Ss Discussing together Quiz and Individual Written reflection Problem giver and instruction
12.
13.
14. Hands on-tool for teacher involvement in design processes Marianne Georgsen Nov. 26th 2010
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30. Awareness of the participants Low degree of domain knowledge High degree of domain knowledge Low degree of pedagogical/didactical knowledge Situation 1 : The CoED product should be reviewed and tested by domain specialists, future users and learning designers. Situation 2 : The CoED product should be reviewed by experienced learning designers. High degree of pedagogical/didactical knowledge Situation 3 : The CoED product should be reviewed by domain experts and/or tested by domain experts and end users. Situation 4 : The CoED product can be implemented without further research or test.
Editor's Notes
Tool developed to initiate reflection: In 2006 we were working in a development project with a lack of understanding of the complexity of designing for learning This tool was developed so we could find a way to introduce discussion and negotians into the process – the predominant understanding was that there was a give solution, a ”one size fit all”-product. As we didn’t agree with this, we needed a way of illustrating what is at stake when you design for learning – most importantly we were looking for a way of working with the assumptions educators have about what good learning and good teaching is.