2. communication
“escalator” (Chapter 7).
• A new chapter, “The Effective Change Manager: What Does
It Take?” (Chapter
12), exploring competency frameworks, interpersonal
communication processes
and skills, issue-selling tactics, and the need for the change
manager to be
politically skilled.
• Improved visual appeal with more graphics and occasional
memorable cartoons.
Now available with
—the leading adaptive learning resource.
connect.mheducation.com
Providing the Skills to Successfully Manage Change
Managing Organizational Change: A Multiple Perspectives
Approach, 3e, by Palmer, Dunford,
and Buchanan, offers managers a multiple perspectives
approach to managing change that recognizes
the variety of ways to facilitate change and reinforces the need
for a tailored and creative approach to fit
different contexts.
The third edition offers timely updates to previous content,
while introducing new and emerging trends,
developments, themes, debates, and practices.
Highlights of the third edition include:
• New coverage of contemporary topics throughout, such as
3. “depth of change” (Chapters 1, 4, and 12),
change in a recession (Chapter 3), the built-to-change
organization (Chapter 4), and the impact of
social media and the communication “escalator” (Chapter 7).
• A new chapter, “The Effective Change Manager: What Does
It Take?” (Chapter 12), exploring
competency frameworks, interpersonal communication
processes and skills, issue-selling tactics,
and the need for the change manager to be politically skilled.
• Improved visual appeal with more graphics and occasional
memorable cartoons.
Now available with
—the leading adaptive learning resource.
connect.mheducation.com
VisionHaving a vision is often linked to why successful
organizational change is achievedConversely, lack of vision is
frequently associated with organizational declineThe concept of
vision is controversial because of the cynicism that can exists
around bland or too grandiose vision statementsVisions are
useful when they couple an engaging picture of the future with
sufficient detail to be meaningful to the ‘targets’ of the
visionOrganizational change is linked to the image one has of
managing change Vision is commonly thought of as a guide for
the organization in identifying the appropriateness of particular
changes that are proposed
Vision
12. third-party consulting firm can conduct the survey.
BENCHMARK SURVEYS The remainder of this chapter
focuses on benchmark surveys (surveys that describe what
companies pay for certain jobs). Other types of surveys not
covered are skills surveys, which measure what companies pay
for certain skills, or maturity surveys, which measure what
companies pay for experience and education in certain work
areas. Which Jobs to Survey Several criteria act in concert when
deciding which jobs in your organization to survey. The jobs
that should be surveyed: Span levels in the organization. Span
functions. Span families. Have a large number of incumbents.
Are mission-critical. A sufficient number of jobs with a
sufficient number of incumbents should be surveyed to make a
compensation practitioner feel comfortable that he or she has
surveyed enough to achieve the survey’s purpose. Specific
numbers are decided on an individual basis, but some rough
guidelines are: Number of jobs matched—one-third to two-
thirds of jobs. Number of employees in matched jobs—one-half
to three-quarters of employees. Of course, the more jobs, the
better but time and budget constraints often are limiting.
Further, some jobs may be so unique that there is no similar job
match in any other organization. Remember: The quality of job
matches is more important than the quantity of jobs surveyed.
Survey Job Descriptions Job descriptions for surveys vary from
short paragraphs to a full page and often include an
organization chart or description of reporting relationships. Jobs
that tend to be standard among organizations often can be
described briefly, such as an assembler or a file clerk. New jobs
or jobs that are similar but have a high degree of variation tend
to be described more fully, such as a marketing development
manager. Regardless, the survey job descriptions should have
the main thrust of the job, along with the principal functions or
key responsibilities, and the job title should be descriptive.
When reporting relationships (e.g., reports to the president) or
scope (e.g., revenue of the company or number of direct and
indirect reports) are important in valuing the job, these factors
13. should be included. If certain qualifications or certifications are
required (e.g., master electrician’s license), these criteria
should be included. Use caution when describing education and
experience requirements. With education, rather than stating,
for example, that a college degree is required, instead state what
that degree represents, such as “the theoretical knowledge of the
field or discipline is required,” because someone may have
gained the needed knowledge through experience. This is the
“or equivalent” notion of formal education. With experience,
remember that when a description says, for example, “10 years
of experience,” it usually means experience with increasing
levels of responsibility. However, you may have an incumbent
with one year of experience 10 times over, who is not really
doing the level of work in the description. When years of
experience are part of benchmark survey job descriptions, it
unfortunately directs too much attention on that one factor and
not enough on the work described. Which Companies to Survey
Part of a company’s compensation philosophy should include a
designation of the external reference for compensation program
purposes. The reference usually describes other companies
defined as competition. Examples include local major employers
to compare office and clerical nonexempt jobs or local
manufacturers for assemblers. For professional and supervisory
jobs, companies often look to employers in their industry and
national employers of similar size or revenue in their industry
for upper management and executive jobs. Criteria to define a
company’s competition include companies that: Do the same
thing. Are the same size. Are in the same locations. Hire and
lose employees to one another. It is important to ask managers
who they think is relevant competition. Figure 9.2 offers some
discussion starting points. There may be a situation in which the
reference point is not actual competition, but a realistic and
stable basis for the compensation program. For example, there
is a company near Dallas that draws its employees locally, not
competing with the suburbs around Dallas for nonmanagerial
jobs. But those suburbs are the only source of survey data, so
14. they are used as a reference point for compensation program
purposes. The company decided that not having to commute to
the Dallas suburbs was worth about 10 percent, so its average
pay is 10 percent below the reference point. FIGURE 9.2
Determining the competition. Data to Be Gathered The type of
data needed flows from the survey’s purpose and an
organization’s pay strategy. Choices include: Base salary. Total
cash (base plus bonus/commission). Equity (stock). Benefits.
Typical statistics include: Averages (weighted, unweighted).
Percentiles (10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, 90th). Raw data (after
decoding to preserve confidentiality). Various summaries of
scope data. General information often includes: Current salary
increase budget. Policy information. Design information.
Compensation practitioners need to decide what they want to
seek, or they need to create a survey that satisfies individual
needs. More Than Just Salaries The typical salary survey has
more than base pay reported on benchmark positions. Because
companies manage compensation using a total rewards strategy,
there usually is trend information, including general questions
about merit budgets, salary structure movement, and benefits
provided. For example, the WorldatWork annual Salary Budget
Survey includes questions on trends in variable pay, types of
incentives, and other popular innovations in compensation.
Review the Survey Database Companies often neglect to review
their survey database to determine if it is providing adequate
coverage of jobs and sampling the right companies and
industries. By reviewing the coverage of jobs and looking for
alternative data sources, a company ensures it has
comprehensive intelligence of the labor landscape. Figure 9.3
illustrates a survey job matrix, which is a useful tool for
ensuring the right coverage. Some additional rules of thumb
include: Have at least two sources of surveys for key jobs. This
provides validation of one survey against another. Review the
makeup of the companies included to ensure the competition is
represented.