1. Collection of Mathematics University of Correction<br />Legend 1.Kekeliruan DoomsdayA. Muqoddimah[79:42] (Unbelievers) ask you (Muhammad) about the day of resurrection, when will it happen?[79:44] To your Lord restored the end (of time).[79:45] You are only a warner for those who fear him (the Hour)Seutama-principal and leader of all human beings are Rasululloh shallallohu'alaihi wasallam, mentioned in a hadith shohih when the angel Gabriel asked about the Day of Resurrection, then the apostles answered simply signs end of the world alone, this is reinforced by the revelations of Allah that the case when the Hour is only Allah who knows, one verse that has been mentioned above.Then what about the legend that states the time of Resurrection? Erroneous, the formulation of the timing of the Hour by the French mathematician with a recursive sequence method is wrong in terms of mathematical formulation is clearly sendiri.Hal needs to be clarified, as studied by students in the world.Edouard B. Case Theory<br />In 1883 a French mathematician named Edouard trying to solve the Buddhist Temple of the following legend:quot;
According to legend there is a Buddhist temple in which there are 3 pole (A, B and C) made of small diameter permata.Pada time the world was created, God created the disc with 64 pieces of different sizes on the pole A. The overlap of the diameter discs the largest to the smallest at the top A.Biksu-monk monastery was trying to move a disk from pole A to C pillar entirely by the rules:1.Cakram may move directly to the mast of the C part and partly moved first to the new pole B to C, so that way the whole disc displacement of the pole A to C pillar diameter of the smallest disc on top of mast C sequence until the largest diameter at the base pole C.2.Pemindahan should only be done one at a time (not allowed to move more than one disc at once) and discs that have been moved should not be moved to the place of beginning.3.Biksu move from one pole to another pole in one second and the removal done as efficiently as possible.according to legend, after the transfer is completed then the pole, discs and broken world. quot;
In the break, Edouard argues that efficient stride sequence it is used sacara recursive formula as follows:Step 1: Move (k-1) fruit discs from pole to pole A B. If k> 2, the execution step that would require a process to move the discs one persatu.Akan but, thinking recursively do not have to worry about how the transfers were in detail .*Step 2: Move the discs are located at the bottom of the pole A to C.Step 3: Move (k-1) fruit discs from pole to pole B C. If k> 2, the execution step that would require a process to move the discs one persatu.Akan but, thinking recursively do not have to worry about how the transfers were in detail.Thus formulated:m (k) = 2m (k-1) +1 (recurrence relation)m (1) = 1so as to move:2 discs, m (2) = 2 (1) +1 = 3 steps3 discs, m (3) = 2 (3) +1 = 7 steps4 discs, m (4) = 2 (7) +1 = 15 steps5 discs, m (5) = 2 (15) +1 = 31 steps ...so as to move the disc 64 by Edouard takes takes 18,446,740,000,000,000,000 step or 18,446,740,000,000,000,000 seconds to move the entire disc so that he thought the time interval between the beginning of creation until the end of the world is 584.542 billion years.<br />C. Case Analysis* Note the word bold steps in formulating the above, it is this which makes the wrong perception in perumusan.Padahal to move the 64 discs only takes 127 steps.Let us prove:Efficient order to move:One disc is needed first step2 discs requires 3 steps3 discs requires a 5-step manner:-Move the discs are the smallest diameter to the pole BMoved next to the pole discs B-Move the last disc to the pole C direct-Move the discs from pole B to CThe smallest-diameter discs move to the top of the pole C.So with this step the sequence of discs on poles C sequence from the bottom to the top of the largest diameter to terkecil.Mari we look at this step there is a difference between formulated Edouard and that our analysis, the formulation of Edouard takes 7 steps while the analytical results prove that for move the three discs only takes five steps, of course, the results of the analysis more efficient.Thus, should the formulation of appropriate recurrence relation is:a (k) = a (k-1) +2 (recurrence relation)a (1) = 1To move:2 discs, a (2) = 1 +2 = 3 steps3 discs, a (3) = 3 +2 = 5 steps4 discs, a (4) = 5 +2 = 7 steps5 discs, a (5) = 7 +2 = 9 steps ...Thus to move 64 discs:a (64) = a (63) +2 = 125 +2 = 127 stepsor it takes 127 seconds to move all the discs.Scientifically, it is impossible God created the universe and within 2 minutes 7 seconds suddenly judgment day. Thus, the legend is wrong and also the theory of recursive Edouard is one fatal.<br />FIELD THEORY OF 2.KOREKSI cartesianIn the field of cartesian, ie x ^ 2 + y ^ 2 = 1 is expressed by a circle with center (0,0) and radius = 1.Is this really enough?Let us analyze this in the field of discrete mathematics in the science of relationships.it turned out after our analysis, it appropriate, because the relation to a member x ^ 2 + y ^ 2 = 1 is not only (1.0), (0,1), (-1.0) and (0, -1) , but there is a 'member' other very much even infinite (please verify with the requirements plus the value of x ^ 2 y ^ 2 equal to 1) one(1 / 2, 1/2akar 3) ...Thus it will produce an infinite aspect that has not until juga.Hal angle is clearly different from the circle that the angle is only 360 degrees in terms of x and y axisSo in the statement kertesian x ^ 2 + y ^ 2 = 1 with the imaging circle with center (0,0) and r = 1 is dhoif (weak) hujjahnya (proof).wallohu'alam<br />Algebra Boole CORRECTION(About 1 +1 not equal 2)BISMILLAHSTAGE 1In the formulationxvx = x (the theory of idempotent) (a quot;
vquot;
is quot;
+quot;
)with translationx v x = (x v x) 1 (identity theory)= (X v x) (x v x ') (the theory of negation)= Xv (xx ') (the theory of distributive)>>> this point that we need to consider= X v 0 (the theory of negation)= Xwith the explanation of the above then if x = 1 you will get 1 v 1 = 1 or 1 +1 = 1,,, STRANGE is not it?!turns out this is because the theory of distributive stage explanation of the above.whereas if we see the formulationx v (y z) = (x v y) (x y z)then at any time until we will not get kebenarannya.Walaupun value of y = 0.0000000000001 and z = oEVIDENCEeg x = 1, y = 0.0000000000001, z = 01 + (0.0000000000001 (0)) = (1 +0.0000000000001) (1 +0)1 = 1,0000000000001of course the above is wrong, although the difference is very small.Thus the theory of 1 +1 = 1 or 1 +1 not equal 2, should be corrected.wallohu'alam<br />