Raman spectroscopy.pptx M Pharm, M Sc, Advanced Spectral Analysis
A goal-directed spatial navigation model using forward trajectory planning based on grid cells
1. A goal-directed spatial navigation
model using forward trajectory
planning based on grid cells
Erdem and Hasselmo
2012
European Journal of
Neuroscience
2. People can navigate to specific place using compass and the
map under the grid
Navigation Task
3. Navigation Cells
Rat has the navigation cells that represent the place, grid,
border and direction in the environment
4. Morris Water Maze Test
The Morris water maze shows a spatial learning task of a rat [1]
Rats show impairments in finding the spatial location of a hidden platform in the Morris water-
maze after lesions of the hippocampus [2], postsubiculum [3] or entorhinal cortex [4]
[1] Kipnis et al., 2012, Nature Reviews [2] Steele and Morris, 1999 [3] Taube at al., 1992 [4] Steffenach et al., 2005
Hippocampal lesion Postsubicular lesion Entorhinal cortex lesion
5. Goal-directed choice
Prefrontal cortex to represent task space (i.e. goals and values of cues and
action options)
[5] Verschure et al., 2014
[5]
6. Spatial Information Processing Cells’ Network
Medial entorhinal cortex (mEC) layer II grid cells receive the
input from postsubiculum and mEC layer V
PoS
[6] Witter et al., 2013, Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Bil Sci. [7] Fransen et al., 2006, Neuron
[6]
Hippocampal networkmEC neuronal circuitsEC layer V pyramidal cell
2 s
[7]
7. Persistent Spiking Cell
Persistent spiking cells receive depolarizing input from head
direction cells with preferred direction
Persistent spiking cells generate grid pattern of grid cell
[8] Hasselmo, 2008
[8]
8. Method
Simulation environment
▫ All simulations are coded ad performed using MATLAB
▫ Persistent spiking cells’ frequency: 7 Hz
▫ Three head direction cells with preferred directions 0, 120 and 240°
9. Method
Head direction cell persistent spiking cell grid cell place cell
<Head direction cell’s tuning kernel>
<Head direction cell signal>
Error term (noise)
Main orientation
<Phase interference model>
Output of persistent spiking cells
Head direction cell activity
Spiking output of grid cell
10. Method
Different scaling factors
and identical initial phase
cause grid cell firing
The firing field is
formatted by summation
of amplitude
14. Method
When the virtual rat is introduced to a never-before experienced environment, a
new place cell is recruited receiving its synaptic inputs from a new population of
grid cells
The virtual rat recruits new place cells either deterministically or in a pseudo-
random fashion
15. Method
Forward linear look-ahead trajectory probes
▫ This model does not require storage of fixed
route vector between place cells and goal
location
▫ Instead, the virtual rat can pick any place cells
as a goal location, and decide on its next
movement direction based on the topology of
the place cell map
16. Aims
How grid cells emerge using head direction cell inputs, and
place cells emerge using grid cell inputs.
How the place cell map can abstractly represent an
environment’s topology using PFC cortical columns as its main
components.
How a temporal recency effect can be used to connect PFC
cortical columns by Hebbian updates.
19. Result
Quantitative analysis of noisy head direction cell and grid cell
signal effects on the navigation performance
Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (K-S test) is
nonparametric test that based on parameterized
families
22. Conclusion
Grid firing pattern of grid cell could be formed by persistent
spiking neurons
Phase resetting will be one of factor that process the spatial
information
Navigation task is influenced by noise fraction
23. Discussion
Another new model concerns the interaction of trajectory
planning with barriers in the environment
Unrealistic method
▫ Recruited pseudo-random place cell