Essays About Death Penalty

Abstract On The Death Penalty
Abstract
The issue of capital punishment is a difficult one and the opinions are as diverse as the people
giving them. The death penalty exists in 38 states and those that have it spend enormous amounts
of tax payer dollars to engage the justice system in what is a long and drawn out series of court
dates and appeals that are lasting years. In addition, the trials and appeals of those on Death Row
will have attorneys, prosecutors, experts and judges with more experience creating a major strain
on the budget and manpower of the state. Nationally there is no study identifying the cost
associated with the Death Penalty, but each state uses their state laws and pay scales in
determining the cost of the Death Penalty. Prior to the Death Penalty being abolished New York
has spent millions of dollars on Death Penalty cases and the result was there were no executions.
Those in favor of the death penalty believe that the cost associated with incarcerating an
individual for life will far outweigh those associated with the Death Penalty, due to old age,
medical issues, food and other essentials needed to keep one alive. This would be true if the Death
Penalty was a swift method of justice. The monies spent on Death Penalty cases could be far better
spent on local budgets and programs that are evidenced based and proven to provide needed
services, such as law enforcement, drug treatment and youth programs.
Beginning
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Argumentative Essay On The Death Penalty
The Death Penalty has a powerful meaning to it; it's not just a punishment for those criminals who
commit a horrific crime. The Death Penalty offers the execution, gas chamber, lethal injection,
hanging, and firing squad. The capital punishment is a topic that can cause arguments because some
say it helps and some say it cannot help in anyway. The death penalty has saved lives after an
execution, but it has caused many issues for families.
The Death Penalty was established "far back as the Eighteenth Century B.C. in the Code of King
Hammurabi of Babylon, which codified the death penalty for 25 different crimes" ("History"). It
was also apart of the "Fourteen Century B.C.'s Hittite Code, in the Seventh Century B.C.'s Draconian
Code of Athens, which made death the only punishment for all crimes; and in the Fifth Century
B.C.'s Roman Law of the Twelve Tablets" ("History"). The Death Penalty was carried out if it was
drowning, crucifixion, burning while being alive, impalement, and beating to death. As the time
went on by the Eighteen Century A.D. a man named William the Conqueror would not allow people
to be hung unless it was a murder case. As the years carried on in 1608 Caption George Kendall
was the first man who got executed while being record in his colony. Jane Champion was the first
woman who got executed in her colony in 1632. The Death Penalty all started and it did minimize
crimes stated in the early 1800.
Furthermore, the Death Penalty is only an execution for

Persuasive Essay Against Death Penalty
Some people think that self–defense is justified by trying to save your own life but if the murder is
committed on purpose, the murderer obviously does not value life; therefore, why should he/she
be allowed to live when they deprived another human being of this privilege, life? Other people
disagree and think that since the murderer does not value life and commits a crime, the law should
not be taking the same path and contradict itself by sentencing the murderer to death. Why kill
people who kill people to show killing is wrong. Putting people to death to prove that we are
against killing does not make any sense. That statement contradicts the country's belief method.
Thus, death penalty is wrong. The death penalty has been a controversial issue for a long time, and
has its pros as well as its cons. The way it is applied varies from state to state and depends on
different variables. Some may argue that death penalty punishment is inhumane, against most
common religious beliefs, does not reduce the crime, costs a lot more than life in prison, and worst of
all, executions of innocent people, while others are convinced that it is the most effective and
inexpensive way of eliminating dangerous people from the society. However, at the end of the
day, as a society we need to move away from the "eye for an eye" revenge simply because it will
not solve any problem and will not prove anything, the obvious is that by striking back at the enemy,
the only outcome is an endless cycle of violence. Death penalty sends the wrong message.
First, let's explain what death penalty is and go over its history. Death penalty is an act to put a
person to death by law and a legal system to punish and make sure the person does not commit any
future crimes. Death penalty is referred to as capital punishment because historically it meant losing
one's head. Back in the eighteenth century, people were put to death if they were stealing, did not
follow the religion from where they belonged, disobeyed their king or even were thought to be a
witch. They were publicly burned, hung or their head would be cut off to set an example. Nowadays,
types of executions have changed; the modern world uses mostly execution by lethal injection, which

Essay on Death Penalty
The death penalty is the ultimate cruel, inhuman and degrading punishment, and violates the right
to life. It's hard for me as a Swede to understand that a country such as USA still have that kind of
punishment. For many people and nations the USA serves as a model, so it is to me very difficult
to imagine how you can persuade nations like Burma and China to respect basic human rights when
you don't do it yourself.
Body
A. Concerning the Death Penalty
Capital punishment –– the death penalty –– is supposed to select the worst criminals who committed
the worst murders and punish them and protect society by taking their lives.
In numbers far beyond our greatest fears, innocent people are being convicted of murder and
sentenced to death....show more content...
In Florida, it costs S3.2 million per death case, six times the cost of a life sentence; in Texas, $2.3
million, three times the cost of sentencing a defendant to 40 years in a single cell in that state's high
security prison.
Wouldn't it really be better to spend those millions of dollars on programs that might actually do
something to reduce or prevent crime? Hire more police officers, improve education, provide better
prenatal care, take your pick!
D. The death penalty hasn't been shown to be a deterrent to committing murders.
Since 1976, the number of executions and the size of death row have steadily increased. Yet there
has been virtually no change in the national murder rate. And the murder rate remains higher in death
penalty states than in non–death penalty states. According to the FBI's Uniform Crime Report, states
with the death penalty have homicide rates of 7.4 to 100,000; states without the death penalty have a
homicide rate of 4.9 to 100,000
Conclusion
It's natural to feel the need for revenge when a loved one is murdered. But what society needs is a
system of criminal justice, not a system of criminal vengeance. Many places in this country get along
fine without it: here in the Midwest, Michigan, Minnesota, Iowa and Wisconsin all seem to be
relatively civilized and peaceful places, even without the death penalty.
In addition to the United States, the countries with the most documented executions in 1997 include

Essay On Should The Us Use The Death Penalty
Should the United States stop using the death penalty?
The use of the capital punishment or the "death" penalty should not stop being used in the U.S. or
declared as cruel or unusual punishment.
In many cases people slaughter multiple people without flinching and go on with their day should
these people be allowed to live anymore ask the families of those murdered people. What do you
think they would tell you? Some people say that we are getting fewer and fewer use of the death
penalty so it should be abolished. If it is being used so little these days doesn't it mean that it's
working punishment isn't only used to punish those guilty but to set an example for those thinking
of committing a similar crime. "Last year the U.S. executed 39 people fewer than the year
before."(What it means if the death penalty is dying,Richard Dieter) Crimes such as rape, torture,
treason,kidnapping, murder, larceny, and perjury would have anarchy throughout the community if
not acted on...show more content...
In saying this it costs less money than to house feed and possibly treat medical conditions of
criminals i'm not saying that it's a scapegoat for saving money to not let them live. Ask the
families of those lost of the Boston Marathon incident do those who did this horrible act be
allowed to be fed better than children at our own public schools and a roof over their head when
thousands of people in the U.S. are homeless. There are cases in which using the death penalty is
deemed unconstitutional which supports people arguments against it but it does not apply for all
cases. On the other hand other cases in which it is not used when it should be only exposes the
corruption of our seemingly perfect just system. The death penalty should not be taken away and
permanently stated as cruel and unusual

A Thesis Statement For Death Penalty
I.Introduction
A.Startling Statement
B.Some information and recent data with regards to the implementation of death penalty globally
will be briefly discussed.
C.Historical Background of the Death Penalty in the Philippines
D.Thesis Statement
II.Body
A.Counterarguments
1.The death penalty deters individuals from committing crimes; therefore, the crime rates decrease.
2.As a respond to society's demands for justice, the death penalty as a form of retribution is justified
because the criminal deserves the punishment fitted to the severity of the crime he or she committed.
3.The death penalty provides a more precise legal and constitutional due process that extrajudicial
killings lack.
B.Own Arguments
1.Economically, the death penalty will not benefit the country in the long run.
2.The death penalty is proven to have no deterrent effect on crimes
3.The death penalty is disadvantageous and biased towards the lower class of the society.
4.The criminal justice and judicial systems in the Philippines are proven to be flawed and
susceptible to mistakes.
III.Conclusion
A.Quotation "history will just repeat itself"
B.Summary
C.Restate the stand of the research paper
D.Challenge the readers to think rationally and...show more content...
Moreover, 2015 has the highest number of executions recorded since 1989 that accounts to 1,634
criminals executed in the span of only a year; in fact, the data do not include China that keeps the
number of executions a secret of the state. The 58 countries that continue to implement the death
penalty include Japan, North Korea, Singapore, United States of America, China, and Iraq. On the
other hand, the abolitionists in law and practice include Myanmar, Australia, Germany, United

Kingdom, Mexico, and Philippines. ("Death

Is the Death Penalty Ethical? Essay examples
"More than 4,500 people have been executed in the United States since 1930. There is no way of
knowing how many have been executed in U.S. history because executions were often local
affairs, with no central agency keeping track of them (Maloney, 1999)." Over 4,500 people were
executed and this doesn't even include the unreported deaths. Decades ago, death penalty cases
were not even to be reported in many times. For many years, people have been rationalize
themselves for death penalty as " an eye for an eye"(2010).This "eye for an eye" statement is no
longer giving any excuses for killing humans. The controversial idea of whether humans are rational
enough to decide someone's life or death has been questioned. Humans absolutely don't have...show
more content...
People who commit the crime should get imprisoned for what they did for how long ever it is
given. Murderer who took away other's lives should be imprisoned for what they did for the rest
of their lives. Death penalty is absolutely not necessary because imprison itself will take away the
whole lives; they will not be allowed to have any life as human in society. We kill him, because he
killed is simply how death penalty works. Death penalty is only to take away people's life, not
reasonable punishment for their sin. Of course, people think death penalty is not just about the
punishment. People who believe in death penalty show the reason why they do is that death penalty
for sure is a deterrent to homicide. They also take this as a justification of supporting death penalty
system (2010). So people actually expect something out of this system other than just killing the
murderers simply for what they did. This is supposed to be a great solution to make better society by
lessoning the potential crime. In theory, the fact that society has a death penalty system should
somewhat scares the potential murderer and prevents them from committing murder. But the
percentage of murder crime shows the otherwise. Do potential murderers consider the death penalty
before they the murder? The answers are likely to be No. "Most deterrence research has found that

Should the Death Penalty Be Legal? Essay
There is a lot of controversy about whether the death penalty should be legal or not. It is widely
used, with only 18 out of the 50 states having abolished it, but should it be permitted, regardless of
the popularity of it? The answer is no. It should be abolished because it demeans life, is cruel, prison
is a better punishment, and it is not effective.
Steve Earle once said "My objection to the death penalty is based on the idea that this is a
democracy, and in a democracy the government is me, and if the government kills somebody then
I'm killing somebody." The death penalty demeans life. It makes life seem like something that can
just be thrown away if you do something wrong, when in reality, it is something that should be
carefully...show more content...
"There is no man so bad that he cannot be made good for something." says Jean–Jacques Rousseau
in his book, The Social Contract. Everyone can become a better person in some way or another.
People make very bad decisions sometimes and there is nothing anyone can do to prevent that, but
once this happens, then, we can work it out with the person so that they realize that what they did
is wrong and that they can do so much better. If they are simply put to death, then there is no way
for them to improve. Even if they live, and they do not improve in who they are, then we can all be
calm in knowing that they had the opportunity to. "The death penalty is the number one killer of
killers." said Mokokoma Mokhonoana.
A prisoner's life consists of twenty–three hours per day in a tiny, empty concrete cell, with one hour
of daily exercise in a small concrete swimming pool; they have no access to other inmates, and only
rare contact with guards, who say nothing to them; they can see nothing of the outside world except
a tiny sliver of sky. The death penalty as punishment is an unnecessary threat compared to the
dullness of what prison life is like.
Finally, the death penalty is not effective. If it really and truly worked, there would be no more crime
deservant of the death penalty. All of it would have stopped when the death penalty was first
legalized. If criminals feared death, they wouldn't commit the crime in the first

"I don't think you should support the death penalty to seek revenge. I don't think that's right. I think
the reason to support the death penalty is because it saves other people's lives." –– President George
Bush
Many who disagree with the death penalty believe it is immoral, discriminates, is very expensive,
increases crime, and is only a way to carry out revenge. This, however, is not true. Capital
punishment should be legal because it is moral, by not allowing criminals to roam the streets once
again. It does not discriminate against those of color or the poor, and is actually less expensive than
life imprisonment. The most important reason why the death penalty should be legal is because it
deters crime.
In past centuries, the...show more content...
The way we carry out these executions is by lethal injection, which is much more humane than any
ways we have carried it out in historical times (McCuen 27). A prison official had claimed, "The guy
will just go to sleep forever. It will be easy–real easy" (49). He says said this when referring to a
man who was on death row. By using lethal injection, the United States is ridding itself of
criminals, and is carrying it out in the most humane way possible (Kurtz). Professor John
McAdams of Marquette University said, "If we execute murderers and there is in fact no
deterrent effect, we have killed a bunch of murderers. If we fail to execute murderers, and doing so
would in fact have deterred other murderers, we have allowed the killing of a bunch of innocent
victims. I would much rather risk the former. This, to me, is not a tough call" (Marzilli 21).
An opposition to the death penalty is the fact that it discriminates. Almost fifty percent of people on
death row between in 2014 were African American (Markoff). This might just mean that African
Americans and other minorities commit crimes disproportionate to their numbers (Kurtz). It is also
true that more men than women die from capital punishment, yet no one is shocked by this statistic.
It's not surprising that most on death row are around the age of twenty one, compared to seventy
(Kurtz). Many who oppose the death penalty claim that with

A Debate of the Death Penalty Essay
The death penalty raises important questions about the right to life, who has a right to life, and
under what circumstances a right to life can be taken away. I believe there are no circumstances
under which capital punishment is justified. I will proceed to defend my claim that capital
punishment is unjustified by arguing a position that killing is wrong because it deprives individuals
of valuable futures. To support my thesis that capital punishment is not justified, I will expand upon
an argument made my Don Marquis in his essay "Why Abortion is Immoral" in which he argues that
killing is immoral on the grounds that it deprives human beings of a valuable future. My argument
is as follows:
1.Killing is wrong because it deprives the...show more content...
The outside factors and conditions are irrelevant. Rather, the value is determined by how that
person perceives his or her own life and these future experiences. Thus, when someone is killed, he
or she is deprived of all the things that were of value and will be of value to him or her in the
future. Causing this loss of a valuable future is ultimately what makes killing wrong and immoral
because that individual has permanently lost the opportunity to enjoy his or her future experiences
which are valuable to him or her. My second premise states that death row criminals are in the same
moral category as other human beings with respect to the moral value of their lives. The only factor
which differentiates a criminal from a non–criminal is the fact that the criminal, usually irrefutably,
violated community standards and the law to commit a crime. In the case of a criminal on death row,
he or she would have had to have committed a serious capital crime to receive the death sentence.
Since committing a capital offense is the only reason death row criminals are different from other
human beings, death row criminals are the same as other human beings in every other respect,
including with respect to the value of their futures. Furthermore, the future of a criminal on death
row is just as valuable as the future of a human being not on death row. Any form of capital
punishment is a form of killing. It does not matter who is actually doing the

Why the Death Penalty Should Be Abolished Essay
Why the Death Penalty Should Be Abolished
Why should the death penalty be abolished? The death penalty should be abolished because of
many reasons. Many people believe the saying, 'an eye for an eye'. But when will people realize
that just because someone may have killed a loved one that the best thing for that person is to die
also. People don't realize that they are putting the blood of another person life on their hands. This
makes them just as guilty as the person who committed the crime: the only difference is that they
didn't use weapon except their mouth to kill them. The death penalty should be abolished because it
is racist, punishes the poor, condemns those who are innocent to death, and is a cruel punishment.
...show more content...
A Georgia study found that killers of whites are 4.3 times more likely to receive a death sentence
than killers of blacks. More than 75 percent of those on federal death row are non–white. Of the 156
federal death penalty prosecutions approved by the Attorney General since 1988, 74 percent of the
defendants were non–white (governmentguide.com) . This shows that there is something definitely
wrong with the judicial system. If this isn?t enough to convince you that the death penalty is wrong.
Then people may need to look at other reasons.
The death penalty, does not only show unequal rights, but it also punishes the poor. It shows in
recent studies that if an inmate can afford good legal representation, they might can get a lesser
charge than death row. It also shows that ninety percent of defendants cannot afford to hire an
experienced criminal defense lawyer. Since they cannot afford to hire one, they are forced to use
inexperienced court–appointed attorneys that are being underpaid for their services. The less the
court–appointed attorneys make, the less they want to make their defense so that they can get rid of
this case, and start back making their usual amount of money.
There has been many inmates sentenced to death row that innocent. Since 1973, more than 99
people have been released from prison after being sentenced to death despite their innocence, The
Social Psychology of Police Interrogation: The

Pro Death Penalty Essay
Capital punishment and the practice of the death penalty is an issue that is passionately debated in
the United States. Opponents of the death penalty claim that capital punishment is unnecessary
since a life sentence accomplishes the same objective. What death penalty opponents neglect to tell
you is that convicted murders and child rapists escape from prison every year(List of prison
escapes, 2015). As I write this essay, police are searching for two convicted murders who escaped
from the Clinton Correctional Facility in Dannemora, New York on June 6th, 2015. The ONLY
punishment from which one cannot escape is the death penalty.
Opponents of the death penalty believe capital punishment is unnecessary and inappropriate in our
modern...show more content...
A fifth rationale in opposition is that the death penalty is too expensive or too costly to taxpayers
to justify its use. According to those who oppose the death penalty and certain studies, it costs
more to execute a person than to keep him or her in prison for life (Death Penalty Focus, 2015).
Finally, it is believed by some that the killing at the hands of the state is not a righteous act but
instead is on the same moral level as the murderers themselves.
According to capital punishment supporters, many of these reasons of the anti–death penalty
movement are false and are now wrongly accepted as fact. The argument that the death penalty does
not deter crime is debatable. By executing murderers you prevent them from murdering again. If
these people no longer exist then they obviously cannot commit more crimes. In addition, criminals
have admitted, in thousands of fully documented cases, that the death penalty was the specific threat
which deterred them from committing murder (Pro–Death Penalty, 2014). The opponents of capital
punishment claim that the death penalty has caused and can cause the execution of innocent people.
However, according to the supporters, no evidence indicates that innocent people have been
executed. Upon reviewing 23 years of capital sentences, a Wall Street Journal study indicated that
they were unable to find a single case in which an innocent person was executed (Eddlem, 2002).
Furthermore, advocates note that the

Essay on Death Penalty
Death Penalty
The death penalty is a controversial topic in the United States today and has been for a number of
years. The death penalty was overturned and then reinstated in the United States during the 1970's
due to questions concerning its fairness. The death penalty began to be reinstated slowly, but the rate
of executions has increased during the 1990's. There are a number of arguments for and against the
death penalty. Many death penalty supporters feel that the death penalty reduces crime because it
deters people from committing murder if they know that they will receive the death penalty if they
are caught. Others in favor of the death penalty feel that even if it doesn't deter others from
committing crimes, it will eliminate...show more content...
People opposed to the death penalty also point to the fact that over half of the countries in the world
have abolished the death penalty, including all other major industrialized, democratic nations. In the
five countries with the highest homicide rates that do not impose the death penalty, the murder rate
is 21.6 murders per 100,000 people. In the five countries with the highest homicide rates that do
impose the death penalty, the murder rate is 41.6 murders per 100,000 people ("Deterrence").
Furthermore, the United States has the highest crime and murder rates of any of the other major
democratic nations, all of which have abandoned the death penalty. In 1965, Great Britain called for
a five–year suspension on executions following a recent decline in the imposition of the death
penalty and growing anti–death penalty sentiments in the country. In 1969, the government
abolished the death penalty altogether because there had been no surge in homicides or crime
(Flanders 45). Death penalty opponents feel that these statistics lend credibility to the argument that
the death penalty does not cause a decrease in homicides and in some instances may even lead to an
increase in murders. Another valid point that death penalty opponents use is that the judicial system
is not flawless, and that in the United

The Cons of the Death Penalty Essay
The Cons of the Death Penalty
"...Over 600 people were falsely convicted and 35 faced death for crimes that they did not
commit..."(Johnson). The death penalty is an ineffective and expensive way of dealing justice to
the American people. It is easier and cheaper to send someone to prison for life than to have them
face the death penalty and be executed. Capital punishment is an unnecessary punishment because
criminals are already managed at prisons.
69
The death penalty can lead to the death of innocent people. For example, "...According to a new
study, serious errors occur in almost 70% of all trials leading to the death penalty..."(Leibman). This
shows that if 100 people were put on death row, 70 would have serious mistakes in their...show more
content...
The lack of proper resources during a trial can make the difference between the innocence and
guilt of a person. The death penalty does not always show the innocence or guilt of a person. It
shows how much he or she is willing to spend to help the trial go his or her way. The death penalty
is an unfair system to those who cannot afford the "evidence" they need to help free them.
224
The death penalty is a corrupt form of legal justice. For example, "...Defendants in about one–third of
the Texas cases were represented at trial by an attorney who had been or later was suspended or
otherwise sanctioned..."(Leibman). This use of fraudulent attorneys in a case can lead to enough
inaccuracies in the evidence to wrongfully execute a person. This action is against the
constitutional right given to us of equal justice for all. In addition, "...One of you two is gonna
hang for this. Since you're the nigger, you're elected..."(Texas Police Officer). A Texas police
officer said this to 2 men, one black and one white that were connected to the murder of a
17–year–old girl. Race plays a big part in the sentence of guilty or innocent. However, supporters of
the death penalty claim "...that it enforces the laws by issuing strict punishment to the
offenders..."(President George Bush). The death

Synthesis Essay On The Death Penalty
For most of human civilisation, death sentences have been in common use. Most of the time, death
sentences have been issued to people who break the law. However, the use of death is controversial
in its effects and morality. Today, the death penalty is constantly debated about on whether it should
be used or not. The death penalty is usually issued to those commit "terrorism, treason, hijacking
resulting in the death of a hostage, or the killing of a police[officer] or prison guard acting in the line
of duty" (Source D). As source B indicates, opinions on the death penalty are mixed as the
percentages of those in favour and of those opposed fluctuate. The death penalty is unjust as a form
of punishment for committing a major felony. The death penalty is permanent and is morally
wrong. The penalty of death is a permanent solution as a punishment. Often times in court cases,
there is a "likelihood of a miscarriage of justice"(Source C). There is often a miscarriage of justice
in cases. In court cases, there are doubts that are voiced. If they are ordered the death penalty, they
may be found out to be innocent. However, they...show more content...
The mother of a murder victim has stated "Responding to one killing with another killing does
not [honour] my daughter"(Source F). The killing of another person doesn't mean we should kill
another for justice. In reality, the death sentences is based on emotional reactions as we try to
sympathise with the victims. This should not be the way cases should be run, since they should
be based off factual evidence. Society needs to realise that "The standard for depriving one of life
should be higher than any other legal action"(Source C). The loss of a life is a difficult choice to
make as a society, even if it's the judgement of a criminal. However, we are no better than the
criminal if we kill them as well. People need to learn from its mistakes, as well as help others learn
from their

Opinion on the Death Penalty Essay
Opinion on the Death Penalty
The death penalty, also referred to as capital punishment, has been abolished in Canada since 1976,
but still exist in a few American States. The last execution in Canada took place in 1962.
I disagree with the death penalty for several reasons. My first reason is that I find it extremely
inhumane to take someone's life in order to demonstrate the power of the law. Another reason for
my disapproval of the death penalty, is the amount of money that it takes to put someone to death,
as it would cost the same to keep an inmate in jail for life, as it would to put that same inmate to
death. My third and final reason, is the guilty conscience that is placed on everyone involved: the
jury who convicted...show more content...
Therefore, I do not feel that Canada should permit such a deplorable undertaking of a human life. I
know they must be punished, but there is a better way.
Prior to putting someone to death, the accused's lawyer will attempt several appeals to the courts in
order to lengthen the amount of time he has to live; and dependent on a technicality, or a
sympathetic jury, the accused may be sentenced to life imprisonment. These appeals take up an
abundance of court time and cost the public millions of dollars. With the cost of these appeals, it
would cost the same amount to keep the same inmate in jail for a life term.
Would it not be better for the inmate to perhaps obtain an education or be given the chance to
rehabilitate, rather than strapped to a chair and killed ??? I personally would rather see the inmate
suffer in prison and have nothing to look forward to rather than letting the government put him out
of his misery by killing him. To sentence someone to death takes one trial but to actually get some
one in the chair to kill them could take a dozen of trials. The question must be asked why do we
bother with this lengthy and costly process when we could sentence people to life in prison, at the
same cost.
The killing of a human being is very traumatizing to all. Whenever the courts issue someone to death,
the innocent everyday people who are involved must be affected. Just imagine how these normal
human beings, like you and I,

Against The Death Penalty Essay
Against the Death Penalty "Murder is wrong" ("Capital Punishment"). We've been taught this
indisputable truth since childhood. The death penalty is defined as one human taking the life of
another. Coincidentally, that is a classification of murder. There are as many as thirty
–six states with
the death penalty, and it's essential that they change it. The United States needs the death penalty
abolished because it is filled with flaws, cruel and immoral, and is an ineffective means of deterrent
for crime. I understand why you would want to have the death penalty in effect. You probably think
that it will be cheaper to execute people instead of paying taxes for them in jail. There is also a
probability that you think that you will...show more content...
Another flaw is it is morally wrong. No matter how people sugar–coat it, murder is murder, in the
name of justice or in vengeance it is morally wrong. Everyone deserves to live, no matter their
circumstances are. Federal states should not be allowed to decide who lives and who dies,
especially in a country such as the United States, which prides its self on freedom ("Top Ten").
Moreover, the death penalty is applied at random ("Facts"). "The death penalty is a lethal lottery: of
the 15,000 to 17,000 homicides committed every year in the United States, approximately 120
people are sentenced to death, less than 1%" ("Facts"). Many criminals have committed the same
crimes, but few have been sentenced to death for their crimes. In Addition, there is a chance
mentally ill citizens could be convicted to death ("Facts"). According to Amnesty International and
the National Association on Mental Illness, One out of every ten persons who has been executed in
the United States since 1977 is mentally ill. "Many mentally ill defendants are unable to participate
in their trials in any meaningful way and appear unengaged, cold, and unfeeling before the jury"
("Facts"). Many mentally ill defendants have been drugged against their will in order for them to be
competent enough to be executed ("Facts"). Some states still haven't put a ban on executing
mentally ill people such as Organ, although the United States Supreme Court has declared that

The Death Penalty Essay
Is the death penalty really a rational and effective way to respond to the crimes of certain prisoners?
Thirty one percent of society believes we should not keep the death penalty, while others believe that
the death penalty doesn't really keep crime from happening. Of the thirty one percent, many believe
that executing offenders of the law only runs away from the issue at hand. Also, if society thinks
about it, ending the penalty would cost less both physically and mentally. Lastly, abolishment of the
penalty would help rid any of the negative and humane issues at hand: this involves the biblical
verse; thou shalt not kill, and the national human rights law; article 3, and 5 of the Declaration of
Independence. Is the death penalty going...show more content...
Since 1983, 60 mentally ill people have been executed. Also, it is estimated that around five to ten
percent of the death row inmates are diagnosed with some form of mental illness.
Second, ending the death penalty would cost less, when involving the physical and emotional costs
of the punishment. Within the physical aspects of the death penalty, it costs around 90,000 a year
per inmate to stay on death row. The average estimated amount for each inmate, in total, is two
million dollars. Death row costs almost four times as much as life imprisonment without parole.
Since the death penalty costs such a great amount of money, this leads tax payers to pay thousands
of unnecessary money towards the cause. If society realized that they were spending a bunch of
their money on killing inmates, they may rethink allowing the penalty in the first place. When
involving the emotional costs of the punishment, ending the death penalty would also cost less.
Not only do people have to give up some of their annual salary, they also have to give up their
mercy, compassion, and the family of the inmate's heartache. There is rarely any family who wants
to see their loved one executed. The family is always trying to get the court to change their mind
and allow the inmate to live. If a young child had a mother on death row, wouldn't that be cruel to
take the mother away

A Persuasive Speech On The Death Penalty
Persuasive Speech:
Why I Believe the Death Penalty Should Be Abolished Hello, everyone. My name is Devlin
O'Connell and I am going to be speaking to you today about why I believe the death penalty should
be abolished. There are three factors that I base this argument off which surround ethics, efficiency,
and expenditure. In relationship to ethics, I would like to begin with a quote by human rights
activist, Desmond Tutu, "To take a life when a life has been lost is revenge, not justice."Capital
Punishment, also known as the Death Penalty, is described as a government practice where a person
is put to death by the state as a punishment for crimes such as murder, treason, espionage, and
genocide. While it may seem unlikely that many people would be convicted of a few of the latter
crimes, there were nearly 3,000 people on death row in the last year. Of those 3,000 people, 117
were found to be innocent. It is predicted that at least 3% more of those sentenced would have been
exonerated with enough time and resources. Let that sink in. An untold number of innocent people
have been executed. As it is, many relatives of victims have said that they do not wish for their
relative's killer to be put to death. Circling back to Tutu's quote, the government is not providing
these families with justice – but with revenge.
We are "perpetuating a cycle of violence unworthy of a civilized society," to quote Bernice King,
"retribution cannot light the way to the genuine healing that

The Death Penalty Discussion Essay
The Death Penalty Discussion
In today's world terrible crimes are being committed daily. Many people believe that these criminals
deserve one fate; death. Death penalty is the maximum sentence used in punishing people who kill
another human being and is a very controversial method of punishment. Capital punishment is a legal
infliction of death penalty and since ancient times it has bee used to punish a large variety of
offences. Criminals convicted of murder or rape need to be executed because they are danger to
society and the human race. Other people still argue that one method of execution is just as brutal as
the next.
The common sense argument that death is the best deterrent of crime...show more content...
Society and its mixed feelings towards the death penalty; capital punishment is such a harsh and
uncivilised way of treating criminals, but do they look at how the criminals are acting towards
ending other human beings life. They do not care about the lives they have destroyed, or, the
families of their victims. The death penalty can never bring back loved ones back to their families.
It seems rationally to think that if potential killers are aware that if they commit serious crimes they
would be put to death for it, they are less likely to commit these crimes again.
The concept of retribution and justice should bestow to society. This is imperative for peace to be
maintained and that justice is served. If criminals were allowed to get away with such a serious
crime as taking a humans life fear and chaos would rule. Sentence for life in prison will not be
substantial enough. The government must be trusted to protect its innocent citizens from further
crimes. A vast conception concerning death penalty is that it saves society the costs of keeping
inmates imprisoned for long periods. In the act of preserving due process of justice, the court
appeals involved with the death penalty becomes a long, drawn out and a long expensive process.
Does it save its purpose? Does executing someone for crimes such as rape, murder, adultery,
homosexual behaviour, and prostitution actually prevent

Essays About Death Penalty

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from College Paper Writing Service Reviews

More from College Paper Writing Service Reviews (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Essays About Death Penalty