How digital volunteers and VOSTs can assist official government agencies and emergency management organizations. A brief overview of the experience so far.
2. Engineering Risk Management Solutions
Overview
2
Digital volunteers and emergency management … an ongoing experiment
Types of missions/deployments
Examples … case studies … a global phenomenon … rise of the VTCs
The Volunteer Operations Support Team concept
Integrating digital volunteers in the emergency operations centre
Challenges and opportunities
Questions
Conclusion
3. Engineering Risk Management Solutions
Types of missions and deployments
3
Take on all forms … organic, spontaneous, organized, sponsored
Key characteristics:
Crowdsourced … issues identification … solutions … applications
Most often … distributed task assignments … no hierarchy
Cloud based tools … socially-convergent tools … open source
Incident-specific … core group of coordinators or liaisons with agencies
Some issues:
Coordination challenges … duplication of efforts
Information validation … trusted agents
Mistrust from institutions … misunderstanding of SMEM
4. Engineering Risk Management Solutions
Types of missions and deployments
4
Also vary by type of work being conducted
Social media monitoring, analysis and reporting
Monitoring + crisis mapping
Message amplification
Public information supplementation
Response and recovery coordination
Logistics coordination
Missing persons, family reunification
Imagery/GIS analysis
Others
5. Engineering Risk Management Solutions
Examples … a global phenomenon
5
From strategic, large-scale deployments … to tactical implementation
Haiti earthquake:
– Open Street Maps
– Fletcher School/Tufts + Ushahidi > HUSAR/USAR teams,
– crisis mapping,
– donations apps
Lybia Crisis Maps: official request/activation … SBTF
Christchurch earthquake:
– recovery map,
– Student Volunteer Army FB coordination
Joplin tornado: recovery page on FB
Four-mile Canyon Fire in Boulder: tactical implementation mapping + SM
monitoring
Typhoon Haiyan
Next ? Drones and more
6. Engineering Risk Management Solutions
Virtual Operations Support Teams (VOST)
6
Born in the USA … growing everywhere … different models
VOST origins: Jeff Phillips and others … NEMA barcamp 2011
First activations: Pacific northwest forest fires
Hurricanes Irene and Sandy
International growth: NZVost, CanVOST, VOSTespana, more
Coordination: loose, VOST leadership coalition, http://vosg.us/
Cross-team membership … outside area of ops
Mix of volunteer and professional EM
7. Engineering Risk Management Solutions
Virtual Operations Support Teams (VOST)
7
Use of open source tools: Skype, Google Docs, SMS group text, others
Roles vary for different VOSTs
– Some directly support PIOs and manage SM accounts during crises
– Message amplification: retweets of official posts, engage
– SM monitoring:
• Identify rumours = threats to public health/safety
• Calls for help: route through appropriate channels (Sandy, Moore)
• Detect reputation threats = jeopardize ability of agency to respond
• Validate official messaging
• Situational Awareness
Geo-fenced and keywords/hashtag searches
Best when given specific tasks/requests
8. Engineering Risk Management Solutions
Virtual Operations Support Teams (VOST)
8
Common VOST operational requirements:
Leadership and liaison
Recruiting and training members … and keeping them engaged
IT pros and SM enthusiasts, community volunteers, EM/1st
responders
Basic IMS, basic SM tools (hootsuite, tweetdeck) + online collaborative
tools
What skills are needed? Leadership cadre?
Procedures and references
Need for regular exercises or activation (including support of other teams)
Clear accountability/expectations
When/how to activate … for what types of incidents
Internal work flows and reporting back to agency/EOC
Key: maintain balance between volunteer
enthusiasm and structure
9. Engineering Risk Management Solutions
Integrating digital volunteers in the EOC
9
First, the need to integrate SMEM into EM … from the incident command post
to the EOC at all levels
Looking at the IMS structure … some examples:
Command: up-to-date situational awareness … digi vols can support in
real-time, coordinated with GIS specialists
PIO: VOST team can supplement SM monitoring and message
distribution
Planning: Sit Unit can be augmented by digi vols doing analysis
(imagery, GIS requirements, etc)
Logistics: SM monitoring by volunteers to help match offers of
assistance/supplies with needs in the field
10. Engineering Risk Management Solutions
Challenges … and opportunities
10
Obstacles: not technology but policy/mindset … growing need for acceptance
Common issues:
Digital volunteers: trusted agents? Or wannabees?
SM intel validation? Why should I believe Twitter?
Where to put SM (and liaison with digital vols/VOSTs) in the EOC
Lack of understanding of the benefits of SMEM and digital volunteers
11. Engineering Risk Management Solutions
Challenges … and opportunities
11
Benefits: not agency-based but community-based situational awareness
What can work for agencies:
Used of enthusiastic, trained, tech-savvy volunteers in tight fiscal
environment ( Angus drone video)
Integrated real-time social intelligence to support effective decision-
making and engagement with audiences
Use resources that are available through different time zones and
outside the area of operations …
Build community resilience and speed up recovery
13. Engineering Risk Management Solutions
Conclusion
13
EM agencies trail the public they serve in the adoption of new technology
Move at the speed of your audiences (speed of social networks) or be
irrelevant … Use the tools they use (mobile tech) or don't get heard …
Use the power of the crowd and the cloud
Fantastic pool of volunteers available … eager, dedicated, serious
It's cost efficient !
Editor's Notes
Delete this version tracking and authorization table after receiving corporate approval to release this presentation. Ensure that email records are preserved throughout the entire review process.
Version no.:
Developer(s):
Reviewer(s):
Approver:
Corporate Release: