To Mine or Not to Mine


Published on

To Mine or Not to Mine
The Case of the Tampakan Copper-Gold Project: Mindanao, Philippines

Presented to the Department of National Defense. Conference Room , 3rd Floor, DND Building. Camp Aguinaldo.
Quezon City, Philippines
May 31, 2012

Esteban C. Godilano, Ph.D.
With contributions by Atty. Christian S. Monsod

Congress of the

Published in: Education, Business, Technology
1 Like
  • mining is just short term 'solution' to a problem.

    it does not provide lasting jobs or even infrastructure.

    it leaves environment which cleanup might cost many times more than mining gave. this is normally left to your children or their children.

    after mining operation you'd be left witout income meaning if you relied on mining income you'd left long minus because government works that way. if you start fund for long term investment end result in low democracy country would be predidential etc. ordering the fund to work in a way which has no long term livelyhood [Russia,Venezuela,etc.]

    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
  • AGRICULTURE & ECO TOURISM No to mining in Palawan AND other Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
  • Ang yaman ng Palawan ay yaman ng Pilipinas It is known as the Philippines’ Last Ecological Frontier. It has 40% of our country’s remaining mangrove areas, 30% of our coral reefs, at least 17 Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs), 2 UNESCO World Heritage Sites, and 8 declared Protected Areas (PAs). It is unmatched anywhere in the country.
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

To Mine or Not to Mine

  1. 1. To Mine or Not to MineThe Case of the Tampakan Copper-GoldProject: Mindanao, PhilippinesPresented to the Department ofNational Defense. Conference Room, 3rd Floor, DND Building. CampAguinaldo.Quezon City, PhilippinesMay 31, 2012 Climate Change Congress of the PhilippinesRoom 1 Bonifacio Hall, UP SOLAIR Esteban C. Godilano, Ph.D. Diliman, Quezon City, Philippines With contributions by Atty. Christian S. MonsodPhone no. (632) 408-4203/Email address: email.;
  2. 2. Presentation Outline 1. Our mineral wealth 2. What others are saying about Tampakan 3. What has been done by SMI 4. CCCP scientific analysis on Tampakan 5. Moving forward
  3. 3. Our Mineral WealthThe mining industry is about $840 billion. Philippines goldresources can amount to 7.36 trillion pesos or about 76percent of the country GDP of 9.73 trillion pesos in 2011.(NSDB 2012).  This is equal to more than 65.1 times the income gap of 113.1 billion pesos, the amount needed a year to raise the poor above the threshold of poverty.The drawback: mining activities are usually located in ruraland mountainous areas and can affect farmlands, rivers andshorelines, where the poorest of the poor are located namely,the farmers, indigenous peoples and municipal fishermen.
  4. 4. THE QUESTION Should the Tampakan Copper-Gold project be allowed in the Philippines?• CCCP providing data and facts in geospatial format on the controversies that surround the Tampakan Copper- Gold project.• CCCP argue on the adaption of watershed as the planning domain in conducting impact studies on mining given the “new normal” brought about by climate change.impacts on food and water security, human rights and social justice,suggesting analytical tools in calculating the full cost of mining.
  5. 5. Impacts of Mining• Mining cannot be conducted without affecting the land, water, and air surrounding the site, as well as the various natural resources found in them.• Mining involves the extraction of minerals, but may also involve the use or destruction of non-mineral resources, such as freshwater, timber, and wildlife.  resulting in health problems, displacement of people, social divisiveness, even the need to provide PNP and AFP protection to mining companies.  disasters that can happen from the cutting of trees, from landslides, siltation and erosion, and accidents from mining structures.• All these translate into public costs which are borne mainly by the poor. This is the social justice issue of mining.
  6. 6. Who are the Owners of theTampakan project?Located on the southernPhilippine island of Mindanao,approximately 40 km. north ofGeneral Santos City. TheProject is situated on theboundaries of four provinces: The Tampakan Project is a 2.4 billionSouth Cotabato, Sarangani, metric ton deposit, containing 13.5Sultan Kudarat and Davao del million metric tons of copper andSur, and represents one of the 15.8 million ounces of gold at a 0.3 % cut-off grade. The Project isworld’s largest undeveloped operated by Philippine-basedcopper-gold deposits in the affiliate Sagittarius Mines, Inc. a jointSouth East Asia - Western venture between Xstrata CopperPacific Region. and Indophil Resources.
  7. 7. What will happen?• SMI will clear 3,935 hectares of forest and arable lands when it starts mining operations,• It will build its mine tailing facilities near one of the tributaries of Mal River, the biggest river system in the Tampakan-Columbio area.  The mine life is expected to reach 70 years with more than US$ 5.4B in needed investments.  SMI has allegedly spent more than P10 billion already for the exploration and other activities of the company since 2000.
  8. 8. Who will beaffected?• More than 1,000 families, majority of them belonging to the B’laan tribe, will be displaced and relocated once the company begins commercial operations.SMI promised to provide scholarships, livelihood programs and whatever it is that they need or would help in their development.The common perception of the Blaan community is that theywould not be affected by the operations. “As long as theirancestral lands would not be affected, they were willing tosupport the mining company as it provides incentives that thecommunities need.
  9. 9. Who will be affected?• Damage to critical watersheds would leave thousands of farmers and fishermen with no means to earn a living. The mine development would draw down the capacity of catchments that supply drinking water and irrigation water to NIA irrigation systems that sustain 200,000 hectares of agricultural land for 80,000 farmers in South Cotabato alone. The Tampakan project estimates a water requirement rate of 908 million liters per second. • The mining project proposes to store 1.65 billion tons of waste rock and 1.1 billion tons of tailings in areas of high seismic activity. The open pit will not be back filled and the billions of tons of acid generating waste rocks and wet tailings will require management in perpetuity. “The Tampakan mine has a high potential for loss of life and high environmental damage if a failure of Dams or Rock Storage facilities occurs”. (Goodland and Wick 2010)
  10. 10. What will be its impacts?• If SMI is allowed to operate, it would destroy the environment and contaminate the river systems. It would dry up the irrigation system in the lowlands and the aquifers in General Santos and nearby Koronadal City (The Catholic Church in South Cotabato).  The mine areas are found atop the headwaters of all the big rivers that drain into five provinces namely South Cotabato, Sarangani, Davao del Sur, Sultan Kudarat, and Maguindanao, and the cities of General Santos and Koronadal.  Any degradation in this region will potentially result in the increased siltation of the rivers, a decrease in the water level and a high risk of being contaminated by toxic materials coming from the mine operation upstream (Catherine Abon, Geologist, UP NIGS).
  11. 11. What will be its impacts?• Tampakan project will affect agricultural production and infrastructure projects as the watershed serving the Mal River will be threatened. The Mal River, supplies two major irrigation systems and 22 communal irrigation systems covering 13,968 has. and involving 7,421 farmers. SMI is planning to establish a tailing storage facility in Matanao straddling 1,018 has. that will serve as dumping site of mining wastes (Mindanews: 16 September 2010).• Tampakan mining project is estimated to produce 2.7 billion tons of mine wastes. Marinduque Mine Tailings Storage The mine wastes will be stacked up to 300 meters high and will cover about 500 has., thus the Tampakan Copper Gold Project is said to be “one of the most dangerous mining projects in the world”. (Clive Montgomery Wicks, conservation and development consultant).
  12. 12. Response from SMI• "We have completed our SMI Technical Studies Environmental Impact Assessment • Mine closure and (EIA) studies in accordance with rehabilitation relevant local and international • Water resources standards”. • Mine waste• These robust, evidence-based management studies involved both Filipino and • Terrestrial and aquatic international experts and have ecology taken a number of years to • Noise and vibration • Social impact complete as part of our integrated assessment mine planning process. • Visual amenity• The EIA identified the proposed • Climate and measures to mitigate and manage meteorology the potential environmental and • Economic benefits social risks,” (SMI 2010). • Social benefits
  13. 13. Response from SMIThe tailings generated from the mine processingactivities will be managed and stored in the TailingStorage Facility (TSF) which will cover animpounding area of approximately 1,000 has.A total of 1.35 B tons of material including approximately 250 M tons of high potential acid forming waste rocks will be stored in the TSF. SMI Environmental Awards
  14. 14. Response from SMI• SMI is claiming that they are welcomed by the communities in the mining site because of the economic and social benefits the project will bring.  SMI has sponsored thousands of scholars in all school levels, conducted medical missions, and employed tribesmen in their labor force.  “Our commitment to ethical behavior underpins all our actions and making this Project a reality requires us to work in partnership with our stakeholders in a responsible way” (
  15. 15. A picture is worth a thousand wordsWatershed mappingand impact studiesshould be based ona wholistic approachof “ridge-rivers-reef”. The miningarea straddles threemajor watershedsthat will be affectedby SMI miningoperations andcoveringapproximately (1) Catisan Allah Watershed : 742,858 has. (2) Marbel Watershed: 122,659 has.985,730 has. (3) Padada River Watershed: 120,213 has.
  16. 16. Impact areas in the watershed Direct ImpactDirect impact areawithin the watershedtotaled 271,175 has.These are low lyingareas that are prone tocontamination includingthe Liguasan Marsh.The Catisan AllahWatershed comprisesthe largest areacovering 162,623 has.or 60 percent of the A total of 696 km of rivers/stream length that could betotal impacted areas affected.  Padada River watershed: 259 km.  Marbel watershed: 95 km.  Catisan Allah River watershed: 342 km.
  17. 17. Land Use Impact Within the mining claim area, 32 and 75 percent of the agriculture lands and forested areas will be affected. Original Impact Mining Land Uses Areas Claim (ha)1. Forest 20,064 15,0772. Agriculture 48,119 15,4923. Mangrove 217 04. Fishponds 1,884 05. Marshland and 84,858 0 swamps6. Lakes 9,417 07. Non Agriculture 5,707 6 (Grass land)8. Built-up 1,097 14Total 171,363 30,589
  18. 18. PopulationProvince/City/Municipality (NSO 2010) ImpactedDavao Sur 1) Hagonoy 232,201 48,166 Municipalities plus Cotabato Approximately 16 Municipalities, 2) Matanao 50,928 City, are in direct influence of the Tampakan 3) Kiblawan 43,057 4) Padada 25,127 mines. As of NSO 2010 data, impacted 5) Sulop 29,082 population is approximately 1 million people. 6) Malalag 35,841South Cotabato 1) Tampakan 47,159 2) Columbio No Data 3) Lutayan No DataNorth Cotabato 163,231 1) Tulunan 49,865 2) Mlang 113,366Maguidanao 148,312 1) Buluan 32,310 2) Datu Paglas 29,979 3) Datu Pinag 49,971 4) Pagalungan 36,052Shariff Kabungsuan 1) Kabuntalan 23,143Cotabato City 301,264 Total 915,310
  19. 19. Climate Change Impact and Fault lines SMI technical studies on “climate and meteorology” did not include the impact of climate change in the analysis as this is not included in the EIA guidelines. Original Impact Mining CC Impact Watershed Areas Claim In the case of flooding caused by climate1. Landslide 161,542 39,207 12,515 change and a breach of the controlled structure2. Soil Erosion 159,961 16,156 3,912 in the mine area for affluent, the total flooded3. Drought 68,206 37,234 04. Flooding 491,642 185,330 131 area of 491,642 has. will be contaminated by5. Not Affected 158,822 27,411 14,031 1.35 Bt of toxic material including 250 Mt of high Total 1,040,173 305,338 30,589 potential acid forming waste rocks.
  20. 20. DENR does not support mining over 1,000 meters, yet the Tampakan miningclaim area covers approximately 11,517 hectares of lands (38%) 1,000 metersabove sea level (masl). Worse, underneath the mining area are series of faultlines numbering 14 with a total length of 83 km.
  21. 21. Why watershed planning approach? and supply “Protection of the quality of freshwater resources. Application of integrated approaches to the development, management and use of water resources”. (Chapter 18 of the Agenda 21) We all live in a watershed and we believe that a watershed planning approach is the most effective framework to address the complex issues of the mining industry and above all food and water security in the context of looming climate change impacts.With Climate Change as the “new normal” a watershed approach to adaptation,mitigation, anticipation and disaster management where the forests and mineralsare mostly located. A concerted and integrated effort using the watershed as theplanning domain is necessary. Landslide and flooding do not respectadministrative boundaries or local jurisdictions.
  22. 22. Should mining be allowed in the Philippines?Mining should only be allowed whenfour minimum conditions are met: (1) the environmental, social and economic costs are accounted for in evaluating mining projects; (2) the country gets a full and fair share of the value of the extracted resources, (3) the institutional capabilities of the government to evaluate and regulate mining activities are put in place; and (4) since mining uses up non-renewable natural capital, the money from mining are specifically used to create new capital such as more developed human resources and infrastructure, particularly in the rural areas.
  23. 23. TEV and WAVESEcosystems are especially importantfor developing countries, where the Tributaries in the Tampakan Watershedlivelihoods of many people dependdirectly on healthy ecosystems. Adopt Total Economic Valuation (TEV) and Wealth Accounting and Valuation of Ecosystem Services (WAVES) which is an integration of TEV and natural capital accounting. WAVES is an initiative of the World Bank which is supportive of “responsible mining”. WAVES is a comprehensive wealth management approach to long-term sustainable development that includes all assets – manufactured capital, natural capital, human and social capital. The methodological framework is the UN’s System of Environmental and Economic Accounting (SEEA) developed over the past 20 years.
  24. 24. How will WAVES contribute to poverty reduction?• Valuation of ecosystem services will enable better management of ecosystems.  Natural resources are an important asset for the poor  Improving the productivity of natural assets can lead to poverty reduction by allowing the poor to accumulate assets of their own if economic activities based on natural resources are not “employment of the last resort”.• Ecosystem accounting will also enable the measurement of who benefits and who bears the costs of ecosystem changes.  Essential for careful policy design so that the poor (who lack complementary private assets) also benefit from improved productivity.
  25. 25. Impacts on Human RightsThe Right to Life andSecurity • Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person. (Universal Declaration of Human Rights [UDHR]: Article 3)The Right to Food • The State Parties to the present Covenant, recognise the fundamental right of everyone to be free from hunger. (International Covenant on SMI Seminar on Human Rights Economic, Social and Cultural Rights [ICESCR], Article 11)
  26. 26. Impacts on Human RightsThe Right to Subsistence•Everyone has the right to a standardof living adequate for the health andwell-being of himself and of his family,including food, clothing, housing…(UDHR, Article 25) .‘In no case may a people be deprived of its ownmeans of subsistence.’ (International Covenant on Civiland Political Rights [ICCPR], Article 1.2 and ICESCR, Article1.2) The Right to Health •The State Parties to the present Covenant recognise the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health.’ (ICESCR, Article 12)
  27. 27. Impacts and Footprints Sharing the Pie, Dividing Responsibilities Agricultural Sector LAND USE DENR Grassland Agriculture , Lakes 5,707 ha 32,627 ha 4,987 ha (4%) 9,417 ha (24%) (3%) SMI (7%) Mangrove DILG 30,538 ha 217 ha1,083 ha (18%) (0.16%) (1%) Marshland and swamps Fishponds 84,858 ha 1,884 ha (63%) (2%) DA 134,704 ha (78%) 72 % is under fisheries - 96,376 ha without CC - 491,642 with CC
  28. 28. Impacts and Footprints Sharing the Pie, Dividing Responsibilities LAND USE DENR POPULATION 3% SMI 90,216 SMI (10%)DILG 18% 1% DILG DA 825,094 134,704 (90%) ha (78%)
  29. 29. In Cases of Doubt• Until the new policies and institutional safeguards are fully in place, the government should strictly apply the precautionary principle. The principle is public policy under RA 9729 (Climate Change Act of 2009), and was enunciated by the Supreme Court in issuing the Writ of Kalikasan.  Part V. Rule 20, “Sec. 1: When there is a lack of full scientific certainty in establishing a causal link between human activity and environmental effect, the court shall apply the precautionary principle in resolving the case before it. The constitutional right of the people to a balanced and healthful ecology shall be given the benefit of the doubt.” The Writ of Kalikasan means a legal remedy available to any natural or juridical person, entity authorized by law, people’s organization, non-government organization, or any public interest group accredited by or registered with any government agency, on behalf of persons whose constitutional right to a balance and healthful ecology is violated, or threatened with violation by an unlawful act or omission of a public official or employee, or private individual or entity, involving environmental damage of such magnitude as to prejudice the life, health or property of inhabitants in two or more cities or provinces. (Rules of Procedure for Environmental Cases A.M. No. 09-6-8-SC Rule 7, Sec. 1).
  30. 30. CONCLUSION Doing nothing and a Marinduque Mine Tailings at Boac River business as usual approach (the river is dead until now) to mining coupled with the uncertainty of climate change will be an indictment of our generation that our children will never forgive.“Without social change, climatechange will just worsen thesituation especially for thevulnerable and themarginalized”. Archbishop of Cagayan deOro Most Rev. Antonio J. Ledesma, J.J., D.D., CCCPLead Convener
  31. 31. RECOMMENDATIONS1. Science-based vulnerability mapping to include the New Normal (climate change) in Marinduque Mine Tailings at Boac River the analysis.2. DENR with CCCP to revisit the EIA and EIS guidelines to include WS analysis and reporting systems not only in mining but all projects that requires ECC.3. DENR, NEDA and CCCP should provide the protocol and guidelines for TEV and WAVES analysis in the mining industry.4. Inclusion of Agriculture and Fisheries in the mining industry study and analysis.5. Food and water security should never be compromised, our survival as a nation is at Thank You stake.