HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...
UCEA presentation by Neiderhouse (11-7-13)
1. Background
High School- Vocational Classes
Practical lessons
Leadership skills
Communication skills
College- Defiance, OH
Hands-on Learning
Service
Career- Teacher and Administrator
Character Development
Citizenship
2.
3. Purpose of the Study
Explore if a problem-based service-learning course would:
Reduce behavioral incidences
Impact behaviors reflecting positive character traits
Be applicable and beneficial to students who are considered behavioral
at-risk
Add to limited existing high school research conducted on:
Service-learning
Character development
4. My Interest in Problem-Based Service-Learning
Experiential Learning Approach:
Engaged learning processes
Hands-on experiences
Applying academic learning to the real world
Problem-Based Learning:
Holistic student learning
Increased relevance
Service-Learning:
Communication skills
Teambuilding
Civic engagement
Intrinsic rewards
6. Literature Review
Reduction or elimination of instructional time in life skills classes for
whole-child development (Cawelti, 2006).
Survey of 24,763 high school students reported:
2/3 of high school students cheated on exams
1/4 stole from a store within past 12 months
54% hit someone out of anger with past 12 months
(Britzman & Hanson, 2005)
Doubling of suspensions and expulsions since 1974 (Planty, Hussar,
& Snyder, 2009).
7. Research Questions
1. Does participation in a problem-based service-learning
course reduce behavior incidents requiring discipline
intervention of junior and senior high school students
considered at-risk?
2. Does participation in a problem-based service-learning
course improve behaviors reflective of positive character
traits of junior and senior high school students considered
at-risk?
3. What do high school juniors and seniors who are
considered at-risk report as the benefits and applications of
problem-based service-learning to their lives?
8. Research Methods
Mixed methods embedded design:
Quantitative embedded in qualitative study
Quantitative method:
School discipline data (detentions and suspensions)
Qualitative methods:
Course assignments
Observations
Interviews
9. Research Procedures
Experimental and control group (refer to page 70)
Partnering teacher (experimental):
3 interviews (pre-course, post service-learning, post-course)
Recording of students’ comments and actions in class
Teacher, researcher, and administrator:
Collection of student discipline data (experimental and control)
Collection of course assignments (experimental)
Recording of students’ comments and actions at service-learning
sites (experimental)
10. Class Activities
Guest Speakers
Role Playing Skits
Read about Role Models
Viewed Character Building Movies
Ethical Dilemma Discussions
Service-Learning Projects
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16. Research Findings
and 98)
Research Question #1 (refer to pages 97
:
Experimental Group:
50 less detentions than previous fall semester
Mean of 7.8 detentions per student before course intervention
Mean of 2.8 detentions per student during course intervention
10 less suspensions than previous fall semester
Mean of 1.2 suspensions per student before course intervention
Mean of .20 suspensions per student during course intervention
Control Group:
8 more detentions than previous fall semester
Mean of 1.9 detentions per student in the previous fall semester
Mean of 2.5 detentions per student during the study
11 less suspensions than previous fall semester
Mean of 1.6 suspensions per student in the previous fall semester
Mean of .40 suspensions per student during the study
17. Research Findings
Continued
Research Question #2:
Students reported and teacher recorded (partnering
teacher and myself) improved behaviors reflective of
positive character traits in:
Attitude
Respect
Empathy
Preparation
18. Research Findings
Continued
Research Question #3:
Students reported benefits and applications of the course
included:
Hands-on learning
Teamwork
Thinking before acting
Communication skills
College and career readiness
Academic learning
19. Implications on Education
Problem-based service-learning can provide:
Educators with an instructional method for students to meet
common core standards and 21st century learning objectives.
Students skills to become holistic learners and communicators
in and out-of-class.
20. Literature Contribution
Added to the limited existing high school research conducted on:
Service-learning
Character development
Proactive method for reducing disciplinary incidences.
Improvement of behaviors reflective of positive character traits
(attitude, respect, empathy, and preparation)
Additional method for students to apply learning in real world
setting.
21.
22. Conclusions
Enhancement of administrator and student relationships.
Devoted practice for positive character improvement.
Impacts of reducing behavioral incidences.
Hands-on and relevant learning to contribute to societal needs.
23. Contacts and Copy of Slide Show
Dr. Nick Neiderhouse
Wayne Trail Elementary Principal
Maumee City Schools
Email: nneiderhouse@maumeek12.org
Phone: (419) 893-2851
Twitter: @NickNeiderhouse
Slide Share:
Dissertation: Available on Ohio Link