ROMAN
TOWN PLANNING
SUBMITTED TO:
AR.SHWETA BANSAL
SUBMITTED TO:
NITIN SHIVHARE
ROMAN TOWN PLANNING
EARLY TOWN PLANS
IN ITALY THE EARLIEST ETRUSCAN TOWNS GREW WITH LITTLE OR NO
PLANNING, AND MANY OF THE ITALIAN TOWNS AND CITIES, INCLUDING
ROME ITSELF, WERE ALSO UNPLANNED AND GREW WITHOUT
RESTRICTION
ESPECIALLY WHERE THE GROUND WAS UNEVEN, THEIR STREETS
HAD NO CLEAR PATTERN AND WERE OFTEN VERY NARROW, LINED BY
TALL BUILDINGS, WITH SCALAE (FLIGHTS OF STEPS) ON THE SLOPES.
 THE FOUNDATION CEREMONY OF NEW ROMAN TOWNS ORIGINATED
IN ETRUSCAN TIMES
GREEK & ETRUSCAN TOWN PLANS WERE INFLUENTIAL IN EVOLUTION
OF ROMAN TOWN PLANS.
THIS TYPE OF TOWN PLAN INFLUENCED THE DEVELOPMENT OF
ROMAN TOWN PLANNING, WHICH USED A SIMILAR GRID PATTERN OF
STREETS BUT HAD TWO MAJOR STREETS INTERSECTING AT RIGHT
ANGLES TO PROVIDE A CROSSROADS AS A FOCAL POINT IN THE TOWN
CENTER.
Plan of the Roman town c.
AD 75-150
EARLY TOWN PLANS
THE DEFENSIVE CIRCUIT OF THE FORTRESS
MARKED THE EDGES OF THE NEW TOWN
 A NEW FORUM WAS LAID OUT TO ONE SIDE
OF THE CENTRAL AXIS OF THE TOWN AND ITS
BASILICA WAS CONSTRUCTED ON TOP OF THE
REMAINS OF THE LEGIONARY BATHHOUSE.
THE TOWNS PUBLIC BATHS WERE PLACED
ON THE SLOPING GROUND.
 ON THE SURROUNDING INSULAE (ISLANDS
OF LAND) TIMBER BUILDINGS GREW UP, SOME
OF WHICH WERE EVIDENTLY SHOPS.
OUTSIDE THE FORTRESS DEFENCES WERE
SOME OF THE INDUSTRIES SET UP TO SUPPLY
THE FORTRESS CONTINUED INTO THE EARLY
CIVIL PERIOD
Plan of the Roman town c.
AD 150-400
BY THE LATE 2ND CENTURY THE
TOWN HAD GROWN BEYOND THE
AREA OF THE OLD FORTRESS
AROUND THE YEAR AD 180 A
CONSIDERABLY LARGER
DEFENSIVE CIRCUIT WAS LAID
OUT, FOLLOWING THE NATURAL
DEFENCES OF THE SITE AND
THEREFORE IRREGULAR IN PLAN.
WITHIN THIS AREA STONE
BUILDINGS REPLACED THE OLDER
TIMBER ONES
SOME OF THE STREETS WERE
EXTENDED OR CHANGED TO
SERVE THIS LARGER AREA, BUT IT
IS FAR FROM CERTAIN THAT A
REGULAR GRID OF STREETS
COVERED THE ENTIRE WALLED
AREA.
View of Roman town in the early 4th century
CHARACTERISTIC FEATURES OF A ROMAN TOWN
ROMAN COLONIAL OR CAMP
PLANS WERE ESPECIALLY
DEVELOPED FOR THE MILLITARY
ENGINEERS.
SUCH PLANS HAD NECESSARILY
TO BE SIMPLE TO SET OUT & THE
BUILDING BLOCKS EASY TO
MEASURE.
IN THIS CASE THE GRIDIRON
PLAN PROVED TO BE
SUCCESSFUL.
THE ROMAN DISPLAYED CRUDE
SYMMETRY & ARTISTIC RIGIDITY
IN PRACTISE OF LEVELLING A HILL
TO MAKE THE SITE CONFIRM TO
THE PLAN.
ROMAN PLANNING WAS LIKE THE
CHESS BOARD SYSTEM HAVING
THE PRINCIPAL STREETS
ROUNDING ACROSS THE LENGTH
THE FORUM:
•THE FOCAL POINT OF
THE CITY WAS ITS
FORUM.
•AN OPEN AREA
BORDERED BY
COLONNADES WITH
SHOPS.
• FUNCTIONED AS THE
CHIEF MEETING PLACE
OF THE TOWN.
 USUALLY SITUATED IN
THE CENTRE OF THE
CITY AT THE
INTERSECTION OF THE
CARDOAND THE
DECUMANUS.
THE BASILICA:
•A ROOFED HALL WITH A WIDE CENTRAL AREA—THE NAVE—FLANKED
BY SIDE AISLES, AND IT OFTEN HAD TWO OR MORE STOREYS.
• IN ROMAN TIMES BUSINESS TRANSACTIONS AND LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS TOOK PLACE IN THE BASILICA, BUT THE BUILDING TYPE
WAS ADAPTED IN CHRISTIAN TIMES AS THE STANDARD FORM OF
WESTERN CHURCH.
•THE FIRST BASILICAS WERE ERECTED IN THE EARLY 2ND CENTURY BC
IN ROME'S OWN FORUM, BUT THE EARLIEST WELL-PRESERVED
EXAMPLE OF A BASILICA (C. 120 BC) IS FOUND AT POMPEII.
Pompeii, basilica
Pompeii, basilica
.
THE PUBLIC BATH OCCUPIED AN IMPORTANT PLACE IN SOCIAL LIFE
OF ROMANS.
SOME OF THE HOUSES WERE EQUIPPED WITH BATHING FACILITIES.
CONSTRUCTION WAS OF STONE, BRICK, WOOD & WINDOW GLASS.
Baths of Caracalla, Rome
ROMANS DEVELOPED WATER SUPPLY & DISTRIBUTION, DRAINAGE
SYSTEM & METHOD OF HEATING WHICH ARE DIRECTLY RELATED TO
MANS HEALTH.
THEY CONSTRUCTED GREAT AQUEDUCTS FOR TRANSPORTATION
THROUGH WATER & UNDERGROUND SEVERS.
Aqueduct: Pont du Gare
IF THE AREA IS GOING TO BE UNMANAGABLE THEN A NEW FORUM IS
DEVELOPED FOR A NEW STALITE TOWN.
AN AUGUR MARKED OUT THE AXES OF THE TOWN, THE CARDO
MAXIMUSAND THE DECUMANUSMAXIMUS, BASED ON ASTRONOMICAL
SIGHTINGS.
THE CARDOON A NORTH-SOUTH AXIS AND THE DECUMANUSON AN
EAST-WEST AXIS—AND A GRID OF SMALLER STREETS DIVIDING THE
TOWN INTO BLOCKS, AND WAS SURROUNDED BY A WALL WITH GATES.
STREETS PARALLEL TO THESE AXES FORMED A GRID PATTERN THAT
DIVIDED THE AREA INTO BLOCKS OF LAND (INSULAE) FOR BUILDING.
THE SHAPE OF THE INSULAE (SING. INSULA) WAS USUALLY SQUARE
OR RECTANGULAR AND OF EQUAL SIZE.
PLANNED TOWNS USUALLY HAD A UNIFIED COMPLEX OF FO RUMAND
BASILICA, AND EVENTUALLY ACQUIRED PUBLIC BUILDINGS SUCH AS A
THEATER, AMPHITHEATER, BATHS AND VARIOUS TEMPLES.
 MANY OF THE PUBLIC BUILDINGS AND THE FO RUMWERE OFTEN
SITED IN THE TOWN CENTER, ALTHOUGH AMPHITHEATERS AND
TYPICAL ROMAN CITY
Theater, Orange
Amphitheater Arles
ROMAN COLLONIES
COLONIAE: SETTLEMENTS OR COLONIES ESTABLISHED BY THE STATE
TO FORM A SELF-ADMINISTERING COMMUNITY, OFTEN WITH A
STRATEGIC DEFENSIVE FUNCTION.
THE CREATION OF CO LO NIAE ALLOWED ROME TO EXTEND ITS
PEOPLE, CULTURE AND CONTROL OVER THE HOSTILE, FOREIGN OR
DESIRED TERRITORIES.
ESSENTIALLY, A COLONY CAME INTO BEING WHEN A GROUP OF
ROMAN CITIZENS, BE THEY VETERANS OR CIVILIANS, RECEIVED FROM
THE STATE A GRANT OF LAND IN A PROVINCE (OR IN ITALY).
THE AMOUNT ALLOTTED TO EACH COLONIST FOLLOWED THE
REGULAR PLOTTING USED AS THE STANDARD THROUGHOUT THE
EMPIRE (CENTURIATION).
ONCE MEASURED, ALL THE COLONISTS' LAND RECEIVED THE PRIZED
STATUS OF IUS ITALICUM, IN WHICH NO TRIBUTE WAS DEMANDED
BECAUSE THEY WERE ALL CITIZENS.
THE ADVANTAGES WERE OBVIOUS, AND IN AN EMPIRE WHERE
COMMERCIAL, SOCIAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE COMPETITION WAS
FIERCE, IT HELPED TO HAVE EVERY CONCEIVABLE EDGE.
TOWN FORTIFICATION
 THE FOUNDING OF COLONIES REACHED A PEAK IN THE REIGN OF
AUGUSTUS. MOST NEWLY FOUNDED COLONIES WERE PROVIDED WITH
DEFENSES, USUALLY CONSISTING OF A WALL WITH DEFENDABLE
GATEWAYS.
 ONE PURPOSE OF THESE COLONIES WAS TO DOMINATE THEIR
SURROUNDING AREAS AND IMPLANT THE ROMAN WAY OF LIFE, BUT
NOT ALL AREAS WERE HOSTILE AND SO TOWN WALLS MAY NOT
ALWAYS HAVE BEEN NEEDED FOR DEFENSES.
 HOWEVER, IMPRESSIVE MASONRY WALLS PROVIDED THE COLONY
WITH ENHANCED STATUS, REPRESENTING THE POWER OF ROME.
 WALLS VARIED IN PLAN AND CONSTRUCTION FROM TOWN TO TOWN
BUT WERE USUALLY BUILT AS FREE-STANDING MASONRY WALLS WITH
A CAREFULLY FINISHED FACING OF SMALL BLOCKWORK.
 GATEWAYS WERE KEPT TO A MINIMUM (USUALLY ONE PER SIDE IF THE
TOWN WAS PLANNED AS A RECTANGLE), AND WERE USUALLY
FLANKED BY TOWERS RISING HIGHER THAN THE WALLS.
 THERE MIGHT ALSO BE INTERVAL TOWERS ON THE PERIMETER WALL
ITSELF.
 GATEWAYS USUALLY HAD SINGLE OR DOUBLE PASSAGEWAYS FOR
VEHICLES, FLANKED BY NARROWER PASSAGEWAYS FOR
PEDESTRIANS.
THANK YOU

Roman town planning

  • 1.
    ROMAN TOWN PLANNING SUBMITTED TO: AR.SHWETABANSAL SUBMITTED TO: NITIN SHIVHARE
  • 2.
    ROMAN TOWN PLANNING EARLYTOWN PLANS IN ITALY THE EARLIEST ETRUSCAN TOWNS GREW WITH LITTLE OR NO PLANNING, AND MANY OF THE ITALIAN TOWNS AND CITIES, INCLUDING ROME ITSELF, WERE ALSO UNPLANNED AND GREW WITHOUT RESTRICTION ESPECIALLY WHERE THE GROUND WAS UNEVEN, THEIR STREETS HAD NO CLEAR PATTERN AND WERE OFTEN VERY NARROW, LINED BY TALL BUILDINGS, WITH SCALAE (FLIGHTS OF STEPS) ON THE SLOPES.  THE FOUNDATION CEREMONY OF NEW ROMAN TOWNS ORIGINATED IN ETRUSCAN TIMES GREEK & ETRUSCAN TOWN PLANS WERE INFLUENTIAL IN EVOLUTION OF ROMAN TOWN PLANS. THIS TYPE OF TOWN PLAN INFLUENCED THE DEVELOPMENT OF ROMAN TOWN PLANNING, WHICH USED A SIMILAR GRID PATTERN OF STREETS BUT HAD TWO MAJOR STREETS INTERSECTING AT RIGHT ANGLES TO PROVIDE A CROSSROADS AS A FOCAL POINT IN THE TOWN CENTER.
  • 3.
    Plan of theRoman town c. AD 75-150 EARLY TOWN PLANS THE DEFENSIVE CIRCUIT OF THE FORTRESS MARKED THE EDGES OF THE NEW TOWN  A NEW FORUM WAS LAID OUT TO ONE SIDE OF THE CENTRAL AXIS OF THE TOWN AND ITS BASILICA WAS CONSTRUCTED ON TOP OF THE REMAINS OF THE LEGIONARY BATHHOUSE. THE TOWNS PUBLIC BATHS WERE PLACED ON THE SLOPING GROUND.  ON THE SURROUNDING INSULAE (ISLANDS OF LAND) TIMBER BUILDINGS GREW UP, SOME OF WHICH WERE EVIDENTLY SHOPS. OUTSIDE THE FORTRESS DEFENCES WERE SOME OF THE INDUSTRIES SET UP TO SUPPLY THE FORTRESS CONTINUED INTO THE EARLY CIVIL PERIOD
  • 4.
    Plan of theRoman town c. AD 150-400 BY THE LATE 2ND CENTURY THE TOWN HAD GROWN BEYOND THE AREA OF THE OLD FORTRESS AROUND THE YEAR AD 180 A CONSIDERABLY LARGER DEFENSIVE CIRCUIT WAS LAID OUT, FOLLOWING THE NATURAL DEFENCES OF THE SITE AND THEREFORE IRREGULAR IN PLAN. WITHIN THIS AREA STONE BUILDINGS REPLACED THE OLDER TIMBER ONES SOME OF THE STREETS WERE EXTENDED OR CHANGED TO SERVE THIS LARGER AREA, BUT IT IS FAR FROM CERTAIN THAT A REGULAR GRID OF STREETS COVERED THE ENTIRE WALLED AREA.
  • 5.
    View of Romantown in the early 4th century
  • 6.
    CHARACTERISTIC FEATURES OFA ROMAN TOWN ROMAN COLONIAL OR CAMP PLANS WERE ESPECIALLY DEVELOPED FOR THE MILLITARY ENGINEERS. SUCH PLANS HAD NECESSARILY TO BE SIMPLE TO SET OUT & THE BUILDING BLOCKS EASY TO MEASURE. IN THIS CASE THE GRIDIRON PLAN PROVED TO BE SUCCESSFUL. THE ROMAN DISPLAYED CRUDE SYMMETRY & ARTISTIC RIGIDITY IN PRACTISE OF LEVELLING A HILL TO MAKE THE SITE CONFIRM TO THE PLAN. ROMAN PLANNING WAS LIKE THE CHESS BOARD SYSTEM HAVING THE PRINCIPAL STREETS ROUNDING ACROSS THE LENGTH
  • 7.
    THE FORUM: •THE FOCALPOINT OF THE CITY WAS ITS FORUM. •AN OPEN AREA BORDERED BY COLONNADES WITH SHOPS. • FUNCTIONED AS THE CHIEF MEETING PLACE OF THE TOWN.  USUALLY SITUATED IN THE CENTRE OF THE CITY AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE CARDOAND THE DECUMANUS.
  • 9.
    THE BASILICA: •A ROOFEDHALL WITH A WIDE CENTRAL AREA—THE NAVE—FLANKED BY SIDE AISLES, AND IT OFTEN HAD TWO OR MORE STOREYS. • IN ROMAN TIMES BUSINESS TRANSACTIONS AND LEGAL PROCEEDINGS TOOK PLACE IN THE BASILICA, BUT THE BUILDING TYPE WAS ADAPTED IN CHRISTIAN TIMES AS THE STANDARD FORM OF WESTERN CHURCH. •THE FIRST BASILICAS WERE ERECTED IN THE EARLY 2ND CENTURY BC IN ROME'S OWN FORUM, BUT THE EARLIEST WELL-PRESERVED EXAMPLE OF A BASILICA (C. 120 BC) IS FOUND AT POMPEII. Pompeii, basilica
  • 10.
  • 11.
    . THE PUBLIC BATHOCCUPIED AN IMPORTANT PLACE IN SOCIAL LIFE OF ROMANS. SOME OF THE HOUSES WERE EQUIPPED WITH BATHING FACILITIES. CONSTRUCTION WAS OF STONE, BRICK, WOOD & WINDOW GLASS. Baths of Caracalla, Rome
  • 12.
    ROMANS DEVELOPED WATERSUPPLY & DISTRIBUTION, DRAINAGE SYSTEM & METHOD OF HEATING WHICH ARE DIRECTLY RELATED TO MANS HEALTH. THEY CONSTRUCTED GREAT AQUEDUCTS FOR TRANSPORTATION THROUGH WATER & UNDERGROUND SEVERS. Aqueduct: Pont du Gare
  • 13.
    IF THE AREAIS GOING TO BE UNMANAGABLE THEN A NEW FORUM IS DEVELOPED FOR A NEW STALITE TOWN. AN AUGUR MARKED OUT THE AXES OF THE TOWN, THE CARDO MAXIMUSAND THE DECUMANUSMAXIMUS, BASED ON ASTRONOMICAL SIGHTINGS. THE CARDOON A NORTH-SOUTH AXIS AND THE DECUMANUSON AN EAST-WEST AXIS—AND A GRID OF SMALLER STREETS DIVIDING THE TOWN INTO BLOCKS, AND WAS SURROUNDED BY A WALL WITH GATES. STREETS PARALLEL TO THESE AXES FORMED A GRID PATTERN THAT DIVIDED THE AREA INTO BLOCKS OF LAND (INSULAE) FOR BUILDING. THE SHAPE OF THE INSULAE (SING. INSULA) WAS USUALLY SQUARE OR RECTANGULAR AND OF EQUAL SIZE. PLANNED TOWNS USUALLY HAD A UNIFIED COMPLEX OF FO RUMAND BASILICA, AND EVENTUALLY ACQUIRED PUBLIC BUILDINGS SUCH AS A THEATER, AMPHITHEATER, BATHS AND VARIOUS TEMPLES.  MANY OF THE PUBLIC BUILDINGS AND THE FO RUMWERE OFTEN SITED IN THE TOWN CENTER, ALTHOUGH AMPHITHEATERS AND
  • 14.
  • 15.
  • 16.
    ROMAN COLLONIES COLONIAE: SETTLEMENTSOR COLONIES ESTABLISHED BY THE STATE TO FORM A SELF-ADMINISTERING COMMUNITY, OFTEN WITH A STRATEGIC DEFENSIVE FUNCTION. THE CREATION OF CO LO NIAE ALLOWED ROME TO EXTEND ITS PEOPLE, CULTURE AND CONTROL OVER THE HOSTILE, FOREIGN OR DESIRED TERRITORIES. ESSENTIALLY, A COLONY CAME INTO BEING WHEN A GROUP OF ROMAN CITIZENS, BE THEY VETERANS OR CIVILIANS, RECEIVED FROM THE STATE A GRANT OF LAND IN A PROVINCE (OR IN ITALY). THE AMOUNT ALLOTTED TO EACH COLONIST FOLLOWED THE REGULAR PLOTTING USED AS THE STANDARD THROUGHOUT THE EMPIRE (CENTURIATION). ONCE MEASURED, ALL THE COLONISTS' LAND RECEIVED THE PRIZED STATUS OF IUS ITALICUM, IN WHICH NO TRIBUTE WAS DEMANDED BECAUSE THEY WERE ALL CITIZENS. THE ADVANTAGES WERE OBVIOUS, AND IN AN EMPIRE WHERE COMMERCIAL, SOCIAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE COMPETITION WAS FIERCE, IT HELPED TO HAVE EVERY CONCEIVABLE EDGE.
  • 17.
    TOWN FORTIFICATION  THEFOUNDING OF COLONIES REACHED A PEAK IN THE REIGN OF AUGUSTUS. MOST NEWLY FOUNDED COLONIES WERE PROVIDED WITH DEFENSES, USUALLY CONSISTING OF A WALL WITH DEFENDABLE GATEWAYS.  ONE PURPOSE OF THESE COLONIES WAS TO DOMINATE THEIR SURROUNDING AREAS AND IMPLANT THE ROMAN WAY OF LIFE, BUT NOT ALL AREAS WERE HOSTILE AND SO TOWN WALLS MAY NOT ALWAYS HAVE BEEN NEEDED FOR DEFENSES.  HOWEVER, IMPRESSIVE MASONRY WALLS PROVIDED THE COLONY WITH ENHANCED STATUS, REPRESENTING THE POWER OF ROME.  WALLS VARIED IN PLAN AND CONSTRUCTION FROM TOWN TO TOWN BUT WERE USUALLY BUILT AS FREE-STANDING MASONRY WALLS WITH A CAREFULLY FINISHED FACING OF SMALL BLOCKWORK.  GATEWAYS WERE KEPT TO A MINIMUM (USUALLY ONE PER SIDE IF THE TOWN WAS PLANNED AS A RECTANGLE), AND WERE USUALLY FLANKED BY TOWERS RISING HIGHER THAN THE WALLS.  THERE MIGHT ALSO BE INTERVAL TOWERS ON THE PERIMETER WALL ITSELF.  GATEWAYS USUALLY HAD SINGLE OR DOUBLE PASSAGEWAYS FOR VEHICLES, FLANKED BY NARROWER PASSAGEWAYS FOR PEDESTRIANS.
  • 18.