This document provides evidence of assessment criteria for multiple units and students. It summarizes the performance of a group who created an advertising pitch for a product called "Mist." They met all criteria with distinction, clearly communicating their ideas, using appropriate software, confidently presenting to the audience, presenting written information clearly, and checking for errors. The student signed acknowledging the assessment and plan to improve.

1. Providing Evidence for Unit 1: P4, M4, D4. Unit 2: P1, M1, D1, P2, M2, D2, P3, M3, D3, P4, M4, D4,
P5, M5, D5. Unit 4: P3, M3, D3.
The Advertising Pitch Teacher Assessment
Their Product:
Mist
Grading Criteria Comments Grade
P1, M1, D1
Have they communicated
information and ideas in
discussions about media
production with sufficient
clarity to be understood
All ideas, plans, design
process clearly
communicated
Distinction
P2, M2, D2
Have they used software to
create their presentation?
Prezi, Photoshop, Word
Distinction
P3, M3, D3
Have they addressed and
interacted with the
audience appropriately
Good confident
communication, held eye
contact, answered
questions positively
Distinction
P4, M4, D4
Have they presented
information and ideas for
media production
appropriately in written
formats with sufficient clarity
to be understood
Info and ideas
communicated confidently,
good clear layout
Distinction
P5, M5, D5
Have they checked their
presentation for spelling,
grammar etc
Yes, good text and script
Distinction
Action Plan (to improve grade):
I understand the contents of this action plan and realise that it is up to me to act on the advice
given
Student Signature: Date:
Assessor name:
Date:
Assessor signature:
Members of the group:
Josh Nicolaou
Distinction