3. Our prelim was very limited with its camera
angles. We only had close ups, mid shots,
over the shoulder shots and long shots.
The reason for this is because we were
limited to what we knew.
We incorporated a pan, however it was not
as smooth as it was our first time
experiencing something like that.
4. Now, in our final film, we were exposed to
every possible camera angle such as extreme
close ups, pans, high angles, and we also
learnt how to use depth of field.
In addition to this we feel we have improved
drastically compared to our prelim. Not just
in terms of using a wider range of camera
angles, but mainly with our editing skills.
5. In our prelim, our sound was limited only to
the diegetic sound, such as the opening and
closing of the door, and the dialogue.
One of the downfalls in our prelim was the
loud slam the door had made when it had shut
and this had caused a distraction when the two
actors were talking, making the dialogue quiet.
6. In our film, compared to our prelim, sound was
most definitely much better because we had
used foley to create clearer sounds and when
editing we had ensured they all matched up to
the video.
