34. @alahmadim2010
الدراسات اختيار
Select Studies
الدراسات تضمين معايير تحقق التي الدراسات تحديد
Identification of studies meeting inclusion criteria
ومستخلصاتها الدراسات عناوين مراجعة
Review Title and Abstracts
المعايير مع توافقت التي للدراسات كاملة النصوص مراجعة
Review full text of studies which are found to meet the inclusion criteria
االستبعاد أو التضمين ألسباب بسجل احتفظ
Keep a record of reasons for inclusion or exclusion
األولية الدراسات بنك
الدراسات تضمين معايير تحقق التي الدراسات تحديد
Identification of studies meeting inclusion criteria
ومستخلصاتها الدراسات عناوين مراجعة
Review Title and Abstracts
المعايير مع توافقت التي للدراسات كاملة النصوص مراجعة
Review full text of studies which are found to meet the inclusion criteria
االستبعاد أو التضمين ألسباب بسجل احتفظ
Keep a record of reasons for inclusion or exclusion
53. Antman, E. M. et al. (1992). A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of
clinical experts. JAMA, 268, 240-248.
Boland, A., Cherry, M., & Dickson, R. (2017). Doing systematic review: A student's guide. London: Sage Publications.
Booth, A., & Brice, A. (Eds.). (2004). Evidence-based practice for information professionals: A handbook. London: Facet.
Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods. Oxford university press.
CASP Critical appraisal tools http://www.casp-uk.net/checklists
Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (2009) Systematic Reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking systematic reviews in
health care. www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd/pdf/Systematic_Reviews.pdf.
Chalmers, I., Hedges, L. V., & Cooper, H. (2002). A brief history of research synthesis. Evaluation & the health
professions, 25(1), 12-37.
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011], (2011) Higgins, J.P.T. and
Green, S. (eds.) The Cochrane Collaboration. http://handbook.cochrane.org/
Cooke A, Smith D, & Booth A. (2012). Beyond PICO: the SPIDER tool for qualitative evidence synthesis. Qualitative Health
Research, 22(10),1435-1443.
References
54. Creswell, J. W. (2005). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice
Hall.
Equator network (reporting guidelines) https://www.equator-network.org/reporting-guidelines/
Glasziou P & Del Mar C. (2003). Evidence-based medicine workbook: finding and applying the best evidence to improve patient
care. University of Queensland, Australia.
Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (2017). Introducing systematic reviews. In D. Gough, S. Oliver, & J. Thomas., An introduction
to systematic reviews (pp. 1–18). London: Sage.
Grant, M., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health
Information and Libraries Journal, 26, 91–108.
Hart, C. (2018). Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Research Imagination. London: Sage Publications.
Higgins, J. P., Sterne, J. A., Savovic, J., Page, M. J., Hróbjartsson, A., Boutron, I., ... & Eldridge, S. (2016). A revised tool for
assessing risk of bias in randomized trials. Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 10(Suppl 1), 29-31.
Klassen, T. P., Jadad, A. R., & Moher, D. (1998). Guides for reading and interpreting systematic reviews: I. Getting
started. Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine, 152(7), 700-704.
Machi, L. A., & McEvoy, B. T. (2016). The literature review: Six steps to success. California: Corwin Press.
Moher, D. et al. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement, Annals
of Internal Medicine, 151(4), 264-269.
55. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, G., & Group, P. (2009). Reprint- preferred reporting items for systematic reviews
and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Physical therapy, 89(9), 873-880.
Nielsen, M. B., Pallesen, S., Harris, A., & Einarsen, S. V. (2018). Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of research
on the associations between workplace bullying and sleep. Systematic reviews, 7(1), 1-7.
Oxman A, Guyatt G. (1993). The science of reviewing research. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences ,703 , 125–133.
Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A practical guide. New Jersey: Blackwell
Publishing.
Prospero https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/
Purssell, E., & McCrae, N. (2020). How to Perform a Systematic Literature Review: a guide for healthcare researchers,
practitioners and students. Springer Nature.
Walliman, N. (2011). Social Research Methods. London: Sage.
Whiting, P., Savović, J., Higgins, J. P., Caldwell, D. M., Reeves, B. C., Shea, B., ... & Churchill, R. (2016). ROBIS: a new tool
to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 69, 225-234.
Whiting, P. F., Weswood, M. E., Rutjes, A. W., Reitsma, J. B., Bossuyt, P. N., & Kleijnen, J. (2006). Evaluation of QUADAS, a
tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. BMC medical research methodology, 6(1), 1-8.
،الزهراني
محمد
بن
عبدهللا
.
(
2020
)
.
معايير
تقييم
جودة
البحوث
النوعية
في
العلوم
اإلنسانية
.
المجلة
الدولية
للدراسات
التربوية
،والنفسية
8
(
3
)
،
605
-
622
.