Looking for Snails in 
Four MELNHE Stands 
STEPHANIE SUTTENBERG 
SUNY ESF ‘17 
REU SHOESTRING CREW
Background 
 Snails are found in leaf litter (Oi layer) 
 Need to be damp -- desiccation 
 Snails need Ca (Skeldon et al 2007) 
 Watershed 1 
 Increase numbers 
 Not useable 
 Little research on N and P 
 Lower phosphorus, lower growth rate of individuals (Krist 2014) 
 Higher nitrogen, higher snail population (Stuart A. 2014) 
v
Hypotheses 
N 
P 
N&P 
Ca
Methods 
 Cardboards placed in C6, C8, JBO and JBM 
 Selected for Ca 
 Two 8.5x11in cardboard sheets are laid out in each outer point 
>0.25 inch rain event 
top layers of leaf litter are dry 
One plot
Collection Methods 
 Check underside of cardboard for snails 
 Snails collected in pre-labeled vials 
 Killed with 95% ethanol 
 Later transferred to storage vials 
 Collected four times
Collection Methods 
 Check underside of cardboard for snails 
 Snails collected in pre-labeled vials 
 Killed with 95% ethanol 
 Later transferred to storage vials 
 Collected four times
90 
80 
70 
60 
50 
40 
30 
20 
10 
0 
Average Snails Collected Summer 2014 
Co N P N&P Ca Co N P N&P Ca Co N P N&P Ca Co N P N&P Ca 
C6 C8 JBO JBM 
Average number of snails 
Stand and Plot
16 
14 
12 
10 
8 
6 
4 
2 
0 
Average Snails Collected Summer 2014 
Co N P N&P Ca Co N P N&P Ca Co N P N&P Ca Co N P N&P Ca 
C6 C8 JBO JBM 
Average number of snails 
Stand and Plot 
81.75
16 
14 
12 
10 
8 
6 
4 
2 
0 
Average Snails Collected Summer 2014 
Co N P N&P Ca Co N P N&P Ca Co N P N&P Ca Co N P N&P Ca 
C6 C8 JBO JBM 
Average number of snails 
Stand and Plot 
81.75 
Compared to Control 
N- only increase JBO
16 
14 
12 
10 
8 
6 
4 
2 
0 
Average Snails Collected Summer 2014 
Co N P N&P Ca Co N P N&P Ca Co N P N&P Ca Co N P N&P Ca 
C6 C8 JBO JBM 
Average number of snails 
Stand and Plot 
81.75 
Compared to Control 
N- only increase JBO 
P- Only increase JBO
16 
14 
12 
10 
8 
6 
4 
2 
0 
Average Snails Collected Summer 2014 
Co N P N&P Ca Co N P N&P Ca Co N P N&P Ca Co N P N&P Ca 
C6 C8 JBO JBM 
Average number of snails 
Stand and Plot 
81.75 
Compared to Control 
N- only increase JBO 
P- Only increase JBO 
N&P- No increase
16 
14 
12 
10 
8 
6 
4 
2 
0 
Average Snails Collected Summer 2014 
Co N P N&P Ca Co N P N&P Ca Co N P N&P Ca Co N P N&P Ca 
C6 C8 JBO JBM 
Average number of snails 
Stand and Plot 
81.75 
Compared to Control 
N- only increase JBO 
P- Only increase JBO 
N&P- No increase 
Ca- Increase except C8
y = 0.282x - 1.9893 
r=.50 
14 
12 
10 
8 
6 
4 
2 
0 
Soil Moisture vs. Average Snails Collected 
12 17 22 27 32 
Average Snails 
Soil Moisture
35 
30 
25 
20 
15 
10 
5 
0 
Least Squared Means 
Co N P NP Ca 
Treatment 
p= 0.3
8 
7 
6 
5 
4 
3 
2 
1 
0 
Least Squared Means (Without JBO) p = 0.09 
Co N P N&P Ca 
Treatment 
a 
b b b 
a b
Discussion 
Hypotheses Outcome 
N 
P 
N&P 
Ca
Discussion 
Average of 5.8 snails/m^2 
7.6 snails/m^2 (Skeldon et al 2014) 
 Leaf litter too damp? 
Edge effect? 
Dry out faster 
 Two phase model for N 
 Initial die off, but then favor snail reproduction and survival 
(Stuart 2014) 
 Recently fertilized (June). Die back stage?
Future Research 
 Taxa of individuals will be determined 
 Soil pH levels 
 Soil composition 
 Varying levels of leaf litter dryness 
 “Goldilocks zone”
Citations 
 Krist, Amy C., Adam D. Kay, Katelyn Larkin, Maurine Neiman. 2014. 
Response to Phosphorus Limitation Varies among Lake Populations 
of the Freshwater Snail Potamopyrgus antipodarum 
 Skeldon, M. et al 2007. Terrestrial gastropod response to an 
ecosystem-level calcium manipulation in a northern hardwood 
forest. 
 Stuart, A., & Palenzuela, N. 2014 Effects of fertilizer applications on 
survival and recruitment of the apple snail, Pomacea canaliculata 
(Lamarck). Crop Protection. 
 Wu, J. et al 2014. Identification of optimum scopes of environmental 
factors for snails using spatial analysis techniques in Dongting Lake 
Region, China. Parasites & Vectors.
Acknowledgements 
 I’d like to thank Eli, Jerome, Nora and Abby for setting out 
cardboards 
 Adam and Ruth for much needed advice in layouts, stats and 
methods 
 Eli, Lisa, Adam, Sophie and Justin for collecting snails 
 Matt Vadeboncoeur and Cheryl Bondi for helping with methods

Stephanie snail REUcon

  • 1.
    Looking for Snailsin Four MELNHE Stands STEPHANIE SUTTENBERG SUNY ESF ‘17 REU SHOESTRING CREW
  • 2.
    Background  Snailsare found in leaf litter (Oi layer)  Need to be damp -- desiccation  Snails need Ca (Skeldon et al 2007)  Watershed 1  Increase numbers  Not useable  Little research on N and P  Lower phosphorus, lower growth rate of individuals (Krist 2014)  Higher nitrogen, higher snail population (Stuart A. 2014) v
  • 3.
  • 4.
    Methods  Cardboardsplaced in C6, C8, JBO and JBM  Selected for Ca  Two 8.5x11in cardboard sheets are laid out in each outer point >0.25 inch rain event top layers of leaf litter are dry One plot
  • 5.
    Collection Methods Check underside of cardboard for snails  Snails collected in pre-labeled vials  Killed with 95% ethanol  Later transferred to storage vials  Collected four times
  • 6.
    Collection Methods Check underside of cardboard for snails  Snails collected in pre-labeled vials  Killed with 95% ethanol  Later transferred to storage vials  Collected four times
  • 7.
    90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Average Snails Collected Summer 2014 Co N P N&P Ca Co N P N&P Ca Co N P N&P Ca Co N P N&P Ca C6 C8 JBO JBM Average number of snails Stand and Plot
  • 8.
    16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Average Snails Collected Summer 2014 Co N P N&P Ca Co N P N&P Ca Co N P N&P Ca Co N P N&P Ca C6 C8 JBO JBM Average number of snails Stand and Plot 81.75
  • 9.
    16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Average Snails Collected Summer 2014 Co N P N&P Ca Co N P N&P Ca Co N P N&P Ca Co N P N&P Ca C6 C8 JBO JBM Average number of snails Stand and Plot 81.75 Compared to Control N- only increase JBO
  • 10.
    16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Average Snails Collected Summer 2014 Co N P N&P Ca Co N P N&P Ca Co N P N&P Ca Co N P N&P Ca C6 C8 JBO JBM Average number of snails Stand and Plot 81.75 Compared to Control N- only increase JBO P- Only increase JBO
  • 11.
    16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Average Snails Collected Summer 2014 Co N P N&P Ca Co N P N&P Ca Co N P N&P Ca Co N P N&P Ca C6 C8 JBO JBM Average number of snails Stand and Plot 81.75 Compared to Control N- only increase JBO P- Only increase JBO N&P- No increase
  • 12.
    16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Average Snails Collected Summer 2014 Co N P N&P Ca Co N P N&P Ca Co N P N&P Ca Co N P N&P Ca C6 C8 JBO JBM Average number of snails Stand and Plot 81.75 Compared to Control N- only increase JBO P- Only increase JBO N&P- No increase Ca- Increase except C8
  • 13.
    y = 0.282x- 1.9893 r=.50 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Soil Moisture vs. Average Snails Collected 12 17 22 27 32 Average Snails Soil Moisture
  • 14.
    35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Least Squared Means Co N P NP Ca Treatment p= 0.3
  • 15.
    8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Least Squared Means (Without JBO) p = 0.09 Co N P N&P Ca Treatment a b b b a b
  • 16.
  • 17.
    Discussion Average of5.8 snails/m^2 7.6 snails/m^2 (Skeldon et al 2014)  Leaf litter too damp? Edge effect? Dry out faster  Two phase model for N  Initial die off, but then favor snail reproduction and survival (Stuart 2014)  Recently fertilized (June). Die back stage?
  • 18.
    Future Research Taxa of individuals will be determined  Soil pH levels  Soil composition  Varying levels of leaf litter dryness  “Goldilocks zone”
  • 19.
    Citations  Krist,Amy C., Adam D. Kay, Katelyn Larkin, Maurine Neiman. 2014. Response to Phosphorus Limitation Varies among Lake Populations of the Freshwater Snail Potamopyrgus antipodarum  Skeldon, M. et al 2007. Terrestrial gastropod response to an ecosystem-level calcium manipulation in a northern hardwood forest.  Stuart, A., & Palenzuela, N. 2014 Effects of fertilizer applications on survival and recruitment of the apple snail, Pomacea canaliculata (Lamarck). Crop Protection.  Wu, J. et al 2014. Identification of optimum scopes of environmental factors for snails using spatial analysis techniques in Dongting Lake Region, China. Parasites & Vectors.
  • 20.
    Acknowledgements  I’dlike to thank Eli, Jerome, Nora and Abby for setting out cardboards  Adam and Ruth for much needed advice in layouts, stats and methods  Eli, Lisa, Adam, Sophie and Justin for collecting snails  Matt Vadeboncoeur and Cheryl Bondi for helping with methods