Successfully reported this slideshow.
Your SlideShare is downloading. ×

Shoestring2014 5-decomp

Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Upcoming SlideShare
Shoestring2014 6-respiration
Shoestring2014 6-respiration
Loading in …3
×

Check these out next

1 of 18 Ad

Shoestring2014 5-decomp

Download to read offline

Litter Decomposition Experiments Involving Young Technicians, Rick Biche and Team 2 (2012-2014), A. Crosby Kennett Middle School. Hubbard Brook Annual Cooperator's Meeting, W. Thornton, NH, July 10, 2014.

Litter Decomposition Experiments Involving Young Technicians, Rick Biche and Team 2 (2012-2014), A. Crosby Kennett Middle School. Hubbard Brook Annual Cooperator's Meeting, W. Thornton, NH, July 10, 2014.

Advertisement
Advertisement

More Related Content

Slideshows for you (20)

Advertisement

Similar to Shoestring2014 5-decomp (20)

More from melnhe (20)

Advertisement

Recently uploaded (20)

Shoestring2014 5-decomp

  1. 1. Litter Decomposition Experiments Involving Young Technicians Rick Biche and Team 2 (2012-2014) A. Crosby Kennett Middle School
  2. 2. Context Nutrient and carbon cycles Students will… • develop a model to describe the cycling of matter and the flow of energy among the living and non-living parts of an ecosystem C. VanDyne
  3. 3. Mass Loss of Litter in the MELNHE Stands • Nutrient Addition (N, P, N+P) • Stand Age – Litter mix – Incubation stand • Litter Arthropods (via mesh size)
  4. 4. Young Stand Mix American Beech 1.0±.02g White Birch 0.75±.02g Pin Cherry 0.5±.02g Red Maple 0.5±.02g Mature Stand Mix American Beech 1.25±.02g Sugar Maple 1±.02g Yellow Birch 1±.02g Litter mixes based on data collected in 2009 and 2005 (C7) by Matt Vadabancouer, Marty Acker, Craig See, Corrie Blodgett, and the 2010 Field Crew
  5. 5. Building Litter Bags
  6. 6. Assignment • Simplified data set • Question – What was the effect of mesh size on the loss of mass from litter? – Did fertilization alter decomposition? – How decomposition different between young and old stands? • Use the data to support an answer to the question.
  7. 7. R. Steward Grade 8
  8. 8. R. Steward Grade 8
  9. 9. M. Jones Grade 7
  10. 10. M. Jones Grade 7
  11. 11. Student hypotheses • Young stand litter has more nutrients • There are dead bugs in the large mesh bags • Mature stands have a better environment for decomposition • Young stands have less good soil • The fertilizer is taken by the plants before it gets to the litter
  12. 12. P > Con p=0.03
  13. 13. P > Con p=0.03 P > Con p=0.04
  14. 14. Multiple R-squared: 0.8061, Adjusted R-squared: 0.6364 p = 0.022 Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F) PlotAvgPO4 1 0.0019015 0.00190153 6.8244 0.031017 * Treatment 3 0.0002064 0.00006881 0.2470 0.861309 Stand 3 0.0071567 0.00238557 8.5616 0.007044 ** Residuals 8 0.0022291 0.00027864 Resin strip data from Fisk, M. C., Ratliff, T. J., Goswami, S., & Yanai, R. D. (2014). Synergistic soil response to nitrogen plus phosphorus fertilization in hardwood forests. Biogeochemistry, 118(1-3), 195-204.
  15. 15. • Shoestring crews 2012-2013 – Field help and inspiration • Geoff Wilson and Jackie Wilson – Support and opportunity • Craig See, Adam Wild, Matt Vadabancoer - Reviews • Ruth Yanai, Melany Fisk, Christy Goodale – support and guidance • Sean Littlefield – field assistance • Kevin Richard - trust • Team 2 (155 student technicians) Acknowledgements

Editor's Notes

  • Sorting and Combining Litter
    Litter from the same age stands and nutrient treatment plot was combined and mixed.
  • Collection – 3 reps chosen randomly, returned to lab, litter is removed, dried and weighed.

×