Fptp Voting System Essay

Fptp Voting System Essay
For more than 130 years, Canada's FPTP voting system has been a source of discussion and debates, however, it remain all the same with no changes.
In this section we will discuss few suggested reforms and referendums on the Canadian electoral system that took place over the past decades until most
recently in 2015. We aim from that section to understand what might be the reasons for not considering any changes on the electoral system inCanada.
For example in the 1920s, the emergence of a third party known by the Progressive Party helped to ignite the discussion about the possibility of
changing the federal electoral system in Canada. However, the submitted proposals to switch to a 'majority electoral system' like the Alternative Vote
system (which requires at least 50 per cent of the votes to win a seat) were unsuccessful. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Here we discuss only few of them. The 2005 Single Transferable Vote referendum in British Columbia (BC). British Columbia, in which 160 citizen
were chosen by random by the Citizens Assembly in 2004 to held meeting debating the changing the electoral system throughout the province. The
Assembly met in early 2004 to set out a series of public consultation meetings. The Assembly then decided to recommend that BC should adopt the
Single Transferable Vote (STV) system . Their recommendation to adopt a new electoral system was put in a referendum to question voters in 2005
provincial election. However, the government at that time raised the existing referendum legislation to require a successful vote to achieve at least 60
percent support across the whole province, must including 50% support in 60% of the number of ridings. The referendum results fell slightly short to
meet the above criteria. In 2009, a similar referendum for the Single Transferable Vote (STV) system was held in May 2009. However, the adoption of
STV was
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

The Electoral College Voting System
In the heavily political world we live in today, there are both upsides and downsides to our current system. And with every aspect of our system,
politicians can come up with loopholes to benefit themselves. We are provided free healthcare, but you must fit certain circumstances in order to
receive it. We have the right to a fair trial, but a "fair" trial can quickly become a matter of race, religion, or beliefs. In the same way, ourdemocracy
and how we elect our president must be dealt with a tablespoon of salt.
The Electoral College is our voting system based off of 538 votes dispersed over the span of all 50 states. It is based off of population rather than size;
a state with a massive population like New York gets twenty–nine votes while a more scarce state like Montana only gets three votes. If a majority of
the previously elected voters vote for a particular candidate, then all of the votes for that state is delegated to said candidate.
This has benefitted the United States for decades. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Gerrymandering, a tactic used by the federal government, separates people of an opposing party using county lines just enough so that their favored
party gets the majority of the votes. By this logic, the outcomes of the presidential election has already been decided before candidates begin the
campaign trail. Gerrymandering is the reason we can assume which states are swinging Republican or Democratic. The votes that don't coincide with
the state's previously chosen candidate are completely forgotten, and can only be valid in the popular vote race. While trying to come up with a plan to
participate everyone, the government has therefore silenced other voters. Voters who care about their country. Voters who believe in change. Voters
who don't want to be punished for an amendment they weren't even alive to see it take

Electoral College Voting System
It's interesting to notice that in those four disputed elections of 1800, 1824, 1876 and 1960, the winner of the popular vote didn't become President
because they weren't the winners of the Electoral College votes. The first two instances were mainly due to an unorganized system because of the early
establishment. However, there is a recurring pattern in the later elections.
In 1800, the problem was that the electors had two votes, one for President and one for the Vice President, which, based on the outcome, resulted in the
adoption of the 12th Amendment which ensured that a tied vote for President wouldn't happen again. In the 1824 election resulted in the creation of two
political parties which were the Democratic and the Whig parties.

Laws Of Voting And Its Effect On The Voting System
Measures To Establish Trust in Internet Voting
ABSTRACT
The short history of E–voting is that it is a term used to define the act of voting by means of electronic systems to cast and count votes. This article
discusses about the transparency and other measures to establish the trust in E–voting. E–voting can lead to success if the voters trust in it and have
full confidence on it. It also point out the voting systems how the system is designed technically and functionally and by which the voters can makes
choices between the options and enforces rules to ensure valid voting. It also address challenges of project which try to reach a high level of
transparency for others.
Keywords
Trust, Justified trust, E–voting, transparency, evaluation, verifiability, implementing, profound, testelection, standards, elections
INTRODUCTION
In past decade, the government has starts to discuss the system of E–voting and this modern technology. E–voting is spread in our communication
platform as well as in media and many countries. In United states different types of electronic systems has been establish to cast their votes and
experience it into two parliamentary elections. Germany, Russia and other countries also used internet voting at organizations, companies, homes and
universities.
Over the last 10 years this technology proved that it is most reliable and trustable technology. Some peoples see that this technology is flexible and can
save our precious time and money.

Pros And Cons Of Single Transferable Voting System
Every three years the Australian Senate is reelected using the single transferable voting system. In this system, voters rank the list of candidates by
order of preference to fill spots in a multi–member district. Then a quota is set based on the number of votes cast and the number of Senate seats to
fill. If any candidate receives more votes than the quota, they receive a seat. Any surplus votes are then transferred to second–choice candidates to see
if they reach the quota, and so on until all Senate seats are filled. In reality, single transferable voting is not a perfect election system. Because it does
not follow the independence of irrelevant alternatives criteria of Arrow's theorem, there is always a chance that the system could result

Electronic Voting System in Punp
Original Question:
What is the best way to manually count ballot papers in block vote (BV) systems?
With first–past–the–post systems, one can easily pile the ballots for each candidate, and then tally the totals. Where there is more than one vote
recorded on ballot papers, some kind of tallying system seems unavoidable. What techniques are used in counting block vote ballots elsewhere?
Introduction
"Vote counting is one of the most crucial stages in the election process. Failure to complete the count and transmit results in a quick, transparent and
accurate manner can jeopardize public confidence in the elections and will directly affect whether candidates and political parties accept the final
results." (The ACE Encyclopedia)
Block ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The set of resources available should also be taken in consideration, as they will greatly influence the count, balancing integrity, accuracy, and speed.
Most of the experts involved in this question believe that manually counting the ballots per a "call and tally" approach can be a time–consuming
process, but on the other hand that it also helps guaranteeing transparency, integrity and trust in the system. Basic training of the electoral officials, for
example, could be important because the effectiveness of any vote count process depends on the counting staff. Voter education is also important, as
every individual should be aware of how the votes will be translated into seats, and how the count will proceed. And finally, the transmission of results
should be structured and transparent in order to guarantee the acceptance of the general outcome of the election.
Block Vote Case study: 1989 elections in Jordan
The November 1989 general elections in Jordan were the first competitive ones for nearly thirty years. The country adopted the Block Vote electoral
system, where voters had as many votes as there were seats to be filled within the district, but results turned out to be very controversial. Although it is
difficult to make political analysis (political parties were banned), the University of Jordan has estimated that

Pros And Cons Of A Compulsory Voting System
A compulsory voting system within the United States threatens America's founding ideals and ultimately causes more negatives than positives.
Preventing the United States from creating a compulsory voting system eliminates the demand for an unnecessary disciplinary system, guarantees the
reliability of the majority vote, and ensures that America continues to live up to its promise of Liberty.
Consequently, creating a new law comes with the responsibility for the government to construct a new disciplinary system to protect the law and to
make certain the law is obliged by. In this case, someone that fails to vote would be unreasonably disciplined. Creating a disciplinary system would
cause an added stress on those who must enforce this law. This... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Most people that do not vote today are those who do not take the time to fully evaluate the candidates to make a well thought out vote. Creating this
system will not make these people try harder to choose the best candidate, but instead make a "donkey vote" or a vote that is random without
background knowledge. Preventing a compulsory voting system will also prevent a major decision from being decided by many voters that randomly
selected a candidate. Compulsory voting lessens the value of the votes of people who choose the candidate that accurately stands for their views. If
individuals have no background knowledge of the candidates, their votes carry no meaning toward a true majority decision. Fundamentally making it
possible for a politician to become the president of the United States based on a vote made by an unmethodical whim. Votes should only made by those
who strongly believe in the people they vote for, not by individuals who vote because it is a legal issue. By preventing a compulsory voting system,
the United States would be able to ensure the United States of America makes the right decisions based upon a true

Pros And Cons Of The US Voting System
The US voting system is quite singular. Indeed, this system does not allow the direct vote for presidential candidate. Instead, constituency members in
the fifty states and the District of Columbia take part in an election for a slate of electors. They cast their vote for a specific presidential ticket
including a candidate president and his or her vice–president. The political parties in each state opt for a slate of electors. The constituents chosen by
the party of the candidate winning the good number popular votes in a state become the electors for that state. This means, adding together the full
amount number of votes transversely the US in presidential elections, the system impose the vote counting state–by–state. Then, the frontrunner

Voting System In America
Over seventy years ago, Joseph Stalin, leader of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, made a remark about the 'democratic' voting system in the
United States. He stated, "...it is completely unimportant who in the party will vote, or how; but what is extraordinarily important is this – who will
count the votes, and how." Joseph Stalin, who once was a totalitarian dictator, was able to see the loopholes in our democraticelection process that the
American people never addressed, or they simply ignored. An American's vote no longer matters in the way that it used to; In fact, this is no longer
an area of black and white, instead it has changed to an obscure gray field that shadows over all Americans. The prestigious land of the United States,
where democracy has been held up for over two centuries, is no longer upholding the belief of one man one vote. Instead, it has allowed the 528 votes
of the Electoral College to run rampant and impede on the founding beliefs that all Americans hold dear. Ourvoting process, with the Electoral College
in charge, no longer speaks for the majority of the people in the United States of America.... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Voters were extremely limited in ways to learn about their potential party candidates, and how their ideas related to those of their candidate. But today,
there are several ways for Americans to learn about the candidates. We have television, radio, the internet, newspapers, word–of–mouth, and several
other methods to get the word out. Because of the sources that we now hold, the vote for the presidency should be based completely off of the
popular vote, and the Electoral College should be abolished. The Electoral College has become useless in their job, and needs to relinquish their power
to that of the

Majoritarian And Effective American Voting System
Voting systems are the set of procedures that determine who will run our local, state, and federal governments. These procedures include how the ballot
is structured, how the vote is casted, how the votes are counted, and how the winners are selected. Although there are a variety of ways a voting system
can be structured to enable citizen authorization of authority there are two dominant voting systems in Western democracies: plurality system and
proportional representation. Douglas J. Amy in (2000) and G. Bingham Powell in (2000) present a list of criteria that can be used to determine which
voting system is preferential. In this paper I will consider Accountability, High Quality Campaigns, and Stable and EffectiveGovernment as the criteria
for evaluating voting systems, and evaluate the degree to which majoritarian and proportional representation systems fulfill these criteria. In the
majoritarian vision of citizen control, concentrated power is necessary. Majoritarian elections act as ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In a majoritarian system, voters are able to easily identify which representative they should be holding accountable when unacceptable actions are being
taken. This is possible because the majoritarian system uses single– member districts in which members of the legislature are elected one at a time in
small districts (Amy 29). It also important to note that candidates are elected based on who receives the most votes. This means that it is easy for
constituents to not only identify which representative was elected to serve them but to hold them accountable as well. The same can be said about
political parties, because of the two party system it is very likely that one party will win the majority of the seats in the legislature, which means that
voters will know who to blame for unacceptable actions (Amy

The British Voting System, Undemocratic
This essay will be dealing with the question how the British voting system tends to be undemocratic in comparison with two other European voting
systems – the French and German. The United Kingdom counts five distinct types of elections: UK general elections, elections to national/regional
parliaments and assemblies, elections to the European Parliament, local elections and mayoral elections.(wikipedia, 2008).According to the facts and in
comparison with the French and German systems, the British voting system might be undemocratic. Held generally each four years ( in the UK,
Ireland, Norway) or five years( in France), elections suppose a certain democracy. But what is a democracy? Since the late nineteenth and early
twentieth centuries, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Whoever comes in the government reflects the majority's desire. In this point, this system tends to be more democratic than the First Past the
Post–system in the UK and the voters are encouraged to "vote with their hearts" in the first round and then "vote with their heads". ( European
Politics, pp 134) There is in this system more place and chance for big and small parties.
The Federal Republic of Germany, a federal parliamentary republic of sixteen states uses a mixed system. In this system, voters are given two votes.
One to vote for a candidate in their local constituency or district; the other to vote for a list in a multimember constituency. (European Politics, pp 135).
The benefit or advantage of this system is that it ensures, whatever the results of the constituency, the overall result of the election in a more or less
proportionally way. For this reason this list, the list in a multimember constituency, is a compensatory one. As has been demonstrated, voters in
Germany even get 2 votes, which makes this system more democratic than any other. The voters really have the feeling that their voices are
important, that they can decide who they want in the government and there is no feeling of wasted voices. Besides, a chance is also given to all
parties and the fight for power is not only in the hands of a few groups. In this option, the mixed system seems also more democratic than the British
one.
Initially, one of the most widely used system, the

Broken Voting System
The topic of the United States of America and the broken voting systems within is quite an extensive one, as well as one that deserves to be
covered in much more depth and detail than a simple essay/speech can give. Although, on that note, I shall attempt to consolidate and deliver some
of the many details on why this system is so broken, as well as why it should be fixed, and some proposed ways of doing so. First, I shall cover the
topic of why the system doesn't work and the many flaws that riddle the topic. Soon following, I shall describe to you some of the many proposed
methods to fixing the issues. The first of the many issues that I would like to bring attention to in our current voting system is how little our individuals
votes effect ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Gerrymandering comes in many forms, but does nothing except hurt the current voting system. The best way to explain this is through example, so
here goes. *In this image, the blue circles represent party A voters, and the red squares represent party B voters. The bold lines represent districts,
created by the redistricting that occurs during every census, which are defined by the state legislative system. These lines can be manipulated in many
ways, often creating a result that does not reflect the vast majority of citizen's views. In this example, there are a required three districts. They are
manipulated to cause a two–to–one victory, wasting all of the Party A votes and ensuring Party B a victory despite them having two thirds as many
supporters. This is just one of the many forms of Gerrymandering. These two parameters alone tell us this: The population's voting and choices can be
manipulated to the point that, in a four way election, over 70% of the population can prefer one winner, but another can still take the victory
themselves. Our individual votes are very easily wasted and abused to make our preferred winner lose. Our votes are combined and sent forward, and
that is the first problem. We vote within our states, not directly. If we voted directly to the final ballot, every single citizen's vote will count fully and
completely to the final result. Thus, this leads to the common propositions

A Secure Mobile Voting System Using Fingerprint
A SECURE MOBILE VOTING SYSTEM USING FINGERPRINT
U.Rajkumar, H.Karunakaran, B.karthikeyan, M.venkatesh, rajkuamrudhaya@gmail.com, karunakaranit17@gmail.com ,
G.Revathi M.E. , revugovind@gmail.com, Department of Information Technology, V.S.B Engineering College, Karur.
Abstract– The heart of the democracy is solely depending on the voting. The voting is the right for every citizen in the nation. The fingerprint shows the
most promising future in real–world applications. Because of their uniqueness and consistency over time, fingerprints have been used for identification
and authentication purpose. However, there are some challenges in using fingerprint in real–world application. We are interested in designing and
analyzing the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
That is why majority of secure systems are using fingerprint method alone or in combination with other biometric feature to make systems more secure
in this rapidly advancing technology era. That is why in this Mobile Voting systems are identification of voter is based on fingerprints. A database is
created containing the fingerprint of all the voters in the constituency. Illegal votes and repetition of votes is checked for in this system. Hence if this
system is employed the elections would be fair and free from rigging. Fingerprints are one of many forms of biometrics used to identify an individual
and verify their identity. Extensive research has been done on fingerprints in humans. Two of the fundamentally important conclusions that have risen
from research are: (i) a person 's fingerprint will not naturally change structure after about one year after birth and (ii) the fingerprints of individuals are
unique. Even the fingerprints in twins are not the same. In practice two humans with the same fingerprint have never been found. In this study, for the
fingerprint authentication the minutiae or texture based matching is considered for higher recognition accuracy. This paper is organized as follows:
The section II describes the issues of the present voting system, section III discusses the proposed mobile voting system, Section IV describes the gabor
filter based fingerprint matching, Section V describes the conclusion.
Privacy: (1) neither authorities nor anyone else

The Voting System Of Democracy
Elections give people a voice in order to choose their representatives in the government.
Democracy is a system of government in which the governed votes to elect people to represent them in the government. In a democracy, the people are
exercising their power directly to vote for propositions and measures that could create improvements for the country. Moreover, a democracy is
supposed to take into consideration the entire population and their opinion. However, not everyone in the country is eligible to vote. The founding
fathers established this kind of government in the U.S. in order to have the people in power instead of a monarchy. Although they used this system,
some of the founding fathers feared that the majority would take over. Due to this, America found it essential thatelections had to be free and fair. With
free and fair elections, the population's opinions are better represented. Also, no one is restricted from having a voice, which allows them to be part
of the democracy. Free elections have a great significance because poor individuals will also have a voice. Fair elections allow minorities to have an
equal voice as others. Due to the voting process, American elections are not free because people of color are spending too much time in long lines in
voting places who lack voting machines. The voting process also makes American elections less fair since the ballots are complicated, making it easy
for voters to make mistakes. The voting process makes American

Essay on Plurality Voting System in Canada
The current plurality voting system in Canada is regularly attacked for unfairly representing the popular vote and giving some parties a
disproportionate amount of legislative power while leaving others with none. Opponents contend that other electoral systems would be far superior and
provide a better democracy. Proportional representation (PR) is usually cited as the best alternative; the debate of proportional representation versus
plurality often hinges on the balance between fairness and efficiency. Without attempting the political calculus to determine the rate at which fairness
should be sacrificed for efficiency, this paper will address the very claim that PR is more fair than the plurality system. The proponents contend that PR
is ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Canada, and the majority of former British colonies, use the plurality voting system (Blais and Massicotte, 1997). The plurality, or first–past–the–post,
voting system is a system where the candidate with the most votes, though not necessarily a majority of votes, wins a constituency. This process is
repeated in 308 constituencies across Canada with the party winning the most ridings becoming the government. This system has substantial benefits:
notably that it is clear, easy, and efficient. The system is well understood and produces a very clear government after the election. Most importantly, it
produces a government that has a strong mandate to govern and one that usually hold the majority of seats. A majority government can execute its
policy without concern that other parties can stop it by collectively voting against the legislation in the House of Commons. This allows the
government to take action and implement its election promises with the knowledge that it will have several years of rule before having to answer to
the electorate for its actions.
Opponents challenge the system noting that it results in a significant amount of "wasted" votes because many voters, often a majority, vote for other
candidates during the election but do not receive the representation of their views by a Member of Parliament. Further, disillusionment is created from
the feeling that there are many ridings where there are "safe" party seats that one party or another is going to win

The Electoral System Of Elections And Voting
Democracy has existed since ancient Greece, serving as an inspiration for others and the foundation of many governments of today. Nevertheless, with
time democracy has evolved and numerous forms have been produced. Though these forms are all democratic, they all have their benefits and
shortcomings. The differing electoral systems of countries highlight their levels of democracy and the effectiveness of their government. A common
subject matter in the debate of electoral systems is whether to create an effective government or represent the views of all. The many differing
electoral systems have their own pros and cons, each showing what a country values most in its government. Conceivably the most significant feature
of a democracy is the electoral system. In the scholarly article "Comparing Democracies: New Challenges in the Study of Elections and Voting",
Lawrence Leduc writes, "the electoral system... defines how votes are cast and seats allocated". The electoral system itself determines which candidate
emerges victorious from an election. However, these systems are not simple. Though electoral systems can be qualified as majoritarian, proportional, or
mixed, the systems of different countries all differ; especially in complexity and degree of representation. A webpage published by Georgetown
University with author Charles King states, "There are many different types of electoral systems in use around the world, and even within individual
countries, different electoral

Voluntary And Compulsory Voting Systems
Voluntary and Compulsory Voting Systems: The Affect on Democracy
Across the globe day after day, nations have been progressively attempting to improve the political systems in which they inhabit, the most prominent
political system currently standing as democracy. But what exactly constitutes as democracy? Democracy is a term holding a spectrum of meanings,
many frequently overlapping. In its simplest, most basic form, democracy is referred to "rule of the people." Being the broad term it is, democracy
tends to be represented in various ways around the world. Despite these differences in representation, the endgame is all the same, a rule in the interest
of the people. Using specific countries as models, I strategize to discuss the differences between compulsory voting in Australia and voluntary voting in
Canada to determine whether compulsory voting augments the quality of democracy. In this essay, I argue compulsory voting enhances the quality of
democracy. Through the lens of different voting systems, I plan to defend my claim by discussing the effect thatvoter turnout, civic duty and accurate
representation has on the quality of democracy. While voting is only one of the countless elements involved in politics, it continues to be the very
foundation of our democracy, affecting every aspect of our lives. Whether compulsory or voluntary, voting exists as a link between ourselves and those
who have the authority to implement our interests. The ability to vote is a

Voting System Of A Democratic Government
One of the most significant parts of a democratic government is how the population of the country selects the people that will represent them in the
government. The voting system that a country uses has a substantial impact on how the government of that country is run, and how well the concerns
of the electorate are addressed. There are many important factors to weigh when selecting a voting system, but an efficient voting system needs to
consistently address a few key issues. These include producing a government that represents the electorate's political views as closely as possible,
preventing gerrymandering, and preventing two party rule. What voting system best accomplishes all of these conditions, and could be implemented
for use in the United States? There are three voting systems that this essay will cover; these are first–past–the–post (FPTP), the instant–runoff, and
mixed–member proportional representation (MMP). First–past–the–post (FPTP) is the voting system that is currently used in the United States. This
voting system works by giving each citizen in the electorate one vote to choose the candidate that they feel is the best option. FPTP has many
disadvantages when compared to the instant–runoff and MMP voting systems. For instance, FPTP does not meet any of the above criteria for an
efficient voting system. FPTP does not always produce a government that best represents the political views of the electorate. In some cases FPTP has
produced results where the

Electronic Voting And Voting System Essay
E–Voting
Introduction :
Electronic voting in polling stations is in place of the world's largest E–Democracies, and I–voting is used in some, initially small and E–Historically
conflict–free, countries. Many countries were currently considering Introducing E–Voting systems with the goal of improving various aspects of the
Electoral process. E–voting is often seen as a tool for advance democracy, building faith in electoral management, adding credibility to election results
and increasing the exhaustive efficiency of the electoral process. The technology is evolving fast and election managers, observers, IO (international
organizations), vendors and standardization bodies are consecutively updating their methodologies and approaches. The main reason why E–Voting
have gained such success in these country is just because of convenience in this voting system as comparison to other traditional voting system. To
increasing participation of more and more people in the polls we required Hi–Tech. voting techniques which will enhance and strength this democracy
process. E–Voting technology can speed the counting of ballots & can extend improved the advantage for incapacitate(disable) voters The one most
important benefit using E–voting is that it will increase overall turnout because the voters can vote from any place either he/she is in the state or out of
the state. 'Kenya' is a country who has already implemented the E–voting system and gained very much

United States Voting System
(a) The political cartoon depicts Ralph Nader, a third–party candidate who ran in the 2000 election, addressing America's "throw–away mentality."
Meanwhile, a woman in the background is ironically casting her vote into a trash can labeled "Green Party Votes." Since the Unites States has a
two–party system, the vast majority of our country votes for major party candidates. Therefore, the point of view being expressed about minor parties
is that voting for a third party is throwing away a vote. For example, when Ralph Nader ran in the 2000 election, he had nowhere near the number of
votes needed to even compete with the major party candidates. So, he ultimately took votes away from the major party candidates, which could have
possibly changed the outcome of that presidential election.
(b) Two rules of the United States electoral system that act as obstacles for minor party candidates winningelections is the ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Because they have an unlikely chance of winning a presidential election, minor parties can take chances and promote an idea to a larger degree than
major parties would. Therefore, they can introduce different ideas or issues that may not be mirrored by the platforms of the two major parties. An
example of this is when The Socialist Party introduced the notion of a 40–hour work week in regards to child labor laws in the early 1900s, which led
to the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938. They can also shift national attention to particular issues by pushing major parties to include underrepresented
concerns or groups. In other words, they often push major parties to adapt their policies to include third–party stances. So, when one of the two major
parties win, third–party voters may still get what they want if issues that fit many peoples' ideologies are

North Carolina's Voting System
Living in a nation based on democracy, where a citizen's voice is the equivalent of casting a vote in political elections, the majority of American
citizens eligible to vote do not participate in elections. The rationale behind voter non–participation varies among individuals and demographic groups;
however, they all share a connection regarding their feelings towards their treatment by the country's political system. Minority voters such as blacks
and hispanics are a demographic group highly faced with disenfranchisement in regards to political elections due to oppression. North Carolina's Voter
ID laws are a prime example of how minority voters are being shut out.
Among non–voting Americans, many categorize into demographic groups that are being pushed out by the political system in the form of
misrepresentation and corruption among government officials. According to voter trends in "Who Votes? Congressional Elections and the American
Electorate: 1978–2014 " by Thom File, Americans with low incomes, lower levels of education, younger Americans, and minorities are among some of
the demographic groups experiencing the lowest voter rates. On the other hand, the wealthy, higher educated, older, and non minority white... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Voter ID laws would further enforce the agenda of the republican party by lessening the strength of democratic voters. "Studies have already shown a
significant link between support for voter ID and racial discrimination, among both lawmakers and white voters in general."(Ingraham, 7 Aug. 2016)
Politicians catering to only select demographic groups creates and reinforces a hierarchy apparent to the suppressed demographic groups, causing them
to have the outlook that they are repudiated by the

Mobile Voting System
STUDY OF SMS SECURITY AS PART OF AN ELECTRONIC VOTING SYSTEM
A thesis
Submitted to the Department of Computer Science & Engineering Of BRAC University By
Chowdhury Mushfiqur Rahman ID: 02101108 Shah Md. Adnan Khan ID: 01201055
In Partial Fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree
Of
Bachelor of Computer Science & Engineering May 2006
BRAC University, Dhaka, Bangladesh
DECLARATION
I, Chowdhury Mushfiqur Rahman, University ID: – 02101108 have completed some modules of our proposed Thesis, Secured SMS Service in
Electronic Voting System, Under CSE 400 course based on the result found by me.
I therefore declare that this project has been published previously neither in whole nor in part of any degree except this publication. I ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
Parliament consists of three hundred members elected in accordance with law from single–member territorial constituencies. Besides this there was a
provision of thirty seats reserved exclusively for woman members up to the year 2000 who were elected according to law by the members of the
parliament. Parliament has tenure of 5 years unless dissolved earlier.
1.2

Criteria for

How To Improve Uk Voting System
I believe that we need to make major adjustments to UK elections for them to be fairer. This must include changes to our voting system which is First
Past The Post, a system where electors vote for their first choice candidate and those with the most votes win the election in that constituency. I think
this because the current voting system isn't fair, in the 2015 elections the Conservatives won but just because they got more seats than any party needed
to win they didn't get 50% of the vote BBC news*1 stated that they only got 36.9% which means to me they shouldn't have actually won. Also with
FPTP many votes are wasted because people disagree with the system and don't think there's any purpose in voting. I think that an alternative voting
system would be a much fairer way to choose who is elected. From a school worksheet it stated that in 2005 66% of all MP's elected did not get
over 50% no party has won a majority since 1935 *2. An alternative voting system is where the system asks voters to rank candidates in order of
preference. People can nominate as many preferences as they like. Only first preference votes are counted. Anyone getting more than 50% of these
votes is elected automatically of the votes in their constituency. This should be our new voting system because it gives people a chance to vote for who
they actually want and may make them become more encouraged to vote. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Also people may not be well educated in elections and don't feel comfortable in voting. Another reason why people may not vote is because they do
not like any of the parties and what they pledge for so decide that they might as well not vote. However, in countries such as Brazil non–voters may be
barred from receiving wages or taking professional exams. To me I think this is determination for Brazil for them wanting to have a good

Film Review: Gore's Voting System
Based on what the film lays out for me. I think Gore outright won the election, but got cheated out of the chance, as the film shows many problems
within the voting system. For example, the ballots being too ambiguous for people to know who they're voting for, and Bush's voting party not
analyzing all the rules, as they attempt to sue Gore's voting party for calling forth a hand recount. During the Supreme Court arguments, Gore's lawyer
brought up the fact Governor G.W. Bush himself has passed a law in Texas, arguing in favor of hand recounts when a electoral count has been found
to be mistabulated in such a way as to negatively affect the outcome, which this was considered when it was found to have cost Gore, roughly, 6,000
votes. Not to ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Once they were able to get officials voting, it was found that Gore had won one Florida county by 327 votes. When more votes were found for
Gore, Harris tried to not have them be counted on account of being "late" which the party claimed was faulty reasoning, leading to them getting an
extension on their recount. It was later found that almost 12,000 votes were rejected for felonies despite only a fraction of them having actually
broken any laws. After some time, there was ultimately one last recount to determine whether Gore or Bush had more votes, only for Harris to
suddenly ended it when Gore's party still had about a thousand votes left to count, leaving Bush to win by 537 votes, leading Gore to argue in the
Supreme Court of the United States that his party still deserved some recount time; despite them disagreeing, they did allow the 215 votes from
Volusia, 168 from Miami–Dane, and 40,000 undervotes to be recounted by December

Electoral College: The American Voting System
The Electoral College is a very important process to the American voting system however deciding who gets to be a part of the Electoral College is a
two–step process. First, the political parties in each state choose slates of potential Electors sometime before the general election. Second, on Election
Day, the voters in each state select their state's Electors by casting their ballots for President.
Who makes The Electoral College? The American voting system is very confusing. Many Americans think that their vote goes directly towards
whatever election they are voting towards however it does not. Once a person votes their vote goes toward the Electoral College. The Electoral College
is a process that the founding fathers put in place to

Plurality Voting And Voting System
"We often hear people saying that they're going to vote for someone they don't really like, because he/she is the 'lesser–of–two–evils'." (Ossipoff)
Many take the United States' voting system with an "it is what it is" attitude, assuming it could be no better. This is certainly not the case. The United
States uses what is known as plurality voting, meaning the candidate with the largest percentage of votes wins. This is also a "winner–takes–all"
system, where losers of the election receive no representation. This leads voters to compromise, not selecting their favorite because they believe him
/her to be unviable, and ultimately selecting somebody they don't like (Ossipoff). Plurality voting results in high amounts of wasted votes, making ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Suppose that two districts of equal population are voting to elect 1 representative each. Suppose further that in District A, the winning candidate
receives 90% of the votes, while in District B, the winner receives only 51%. In District A, 39% of the votes for the winner (all excess after reaching
51%) had no effect on the outcome, as that candidate would have won either way. In District B, no winning votes are wasted. However, in both cases,
the same amount of representation is awarded. In essence, 39% of the winning voters in District A are not being represented. Similarly, all votes to the
losing candidate are wasted – their desires are in no way reflected in the result of the election. In any two person race, 49% of voters do not receive
any representation for their vote. With more candidates, often more than 50% of votes are wasted. Voters do not fail to see this, and it affects their
desire to vote (Amy). If natural wasting of votes isn't bad enough, politicians currently holding office grossly manipulate the voting districts to
artificially create wasted votes in a strategy known as gerrymandering. Two types of gerrymandering are most common; cracking and packing. In
cracking, politicians redraw voting boundaries to spread out the votes that oppose them such that in all districts, they hold a minority, effectively
forcing all their votes to be wasted. Similarly, in packing, boundaries are redrawn

Government Vs. Voting In The Court System
How much money a person pays for taxes, how public schools work, why individuals protest are small ways the government impact and change
Americans lives. Learning about the government is beyond crucial because the government affects every angle of Americans lives on a daily basis.
Learning about the government and the nation in general assists citizens in getting involved and acknowledging their Constitutional rights. Additionally,
it makes citizens appreciative and more inspired. Just like the government have the power to change the nation, citizens do as well by getting involved.
However, in order to use any power beneficially citizens need to acknowledge the governmental system. For instance, when citizens realize that their
votes matter they will for sure get involved. Furthermore, when citizens learn about the government they realize there are variety of ways to voice their
opinions. For example, voting in the presidency election, joining a work union, or becoming a poll worker. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Simply from getting pulled over for texting to a court case it is important to recognize the rights an American citizen has. For example, if there is a
civilian in a court case, it is an advantage to know how to use the bill of rights or the constitution in the civilian favors. Otherwise, losing the case is a
great possibility. Learning about the government makes individuals realize how hard others work so the rest can maintain all these freedoms. From
polices officers to veterans of wars it is important to learn about their actions and how they shaped our legislation system. Moreover, appreciating those
who dedicated their lives to serve the rest is important because it sparks nationalism among citizens. Nationalism will inspire citizens to get involved
with the government. This can range from volunteering to help veterans or even becoming the

Essay Voting Systems
Voting systems all around the world serve more functions than to only elect representatives for the people. Elections create a sense of a democratic
environment inside a country; they give accountability and legitimacy to the government in power, assuming it is the people's voice that is being
heard. In a world where most countries enjoy democratic governments and freedom and equality are encouraged, Canada's current voting system is a
nothing but disrespectful to these democratic values. Like in many post–colonial countries, the legacy of imperial regimes has made its way to the
modern political system in Canada, still attacking central democratic principles . Canada has been using a single–member–plurality (SMP) electoral
system, also ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The number of seats a province is given in Parliament is established based on the population of the province. Voters are then divided into
constituencies, also known as electoral boundaries, ridings, or districts. In order to win, candidates must get a highest amount of votes than any other
competitor within the same electoral boundary. This means that if candidate A receives 41% of the votes, while candidate B gets 39% and candidate C
20%, candidate A becomes the winner of the election and gains a seat in Parliament. Note that 59% of the electorate opposed candidate A.
FPP is a simple system that for the average citizen is easy to understand and it provides electorates with fast results. However, simplicity and fast
results are being enjoyed at the expense of democracy. The system's ability to generate phony majority governments represents a major blow to
Canadian democracy. In Canada's case, it is the lack of proportionality that allows this to happen . Canada's current voting system "has been producing
majority governments with less than 50% of the popular vote" since the 1940's. . Only in the Canadian voting system "parties can turn minority of
votes into majority of seats." When parties rule against the will of the majority of the population, democratic values are clearly undermined; therefore,
Canada must

American Voting System Essay
Leading us in circles
Trust is something to be earned not given. The leaders of our governments around the world have earned the trust of their countries. proven from
gaining their votes during elections. but the trust they have is more than they deserve. Their not so transparent voting system ....
their voting system isn't as fair as people would assume them to be. higher powered businesses have the ability to pay for people to vote for someone
in an election. This means People of the public who truly believes a certain candidate could fix their country. their vote becomes basically null and void
because higher power can out vote them
New Zealand's government is built up of many different positions of power, with their spokesperson John Key on top. America, although being on the
complete other side of the world they too are a big influence on us. Our government and Americas government are intertwined through the Wellington
declaration and the T.P.P.A. These documents connect New Zealand and American governments together as... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
but this voting scandal leads back to the trust levels of our governmental system. If this scandal of a president being paid to win could just slip by
without anything drastic happening what else could be going on behind the scenes. The future elections and document signings could become so
corrupt that even the president looses power to do anything about them. All these American problems lead right back to New Zealand. Like the
document signings of the T.P.P.A that although talk about being beneficial. But are secretly about giving Foreign corporations the rights to take the
New Zealand government to an unaccountable international tribunal and claim compensation. With this document on the verge of being ratified makes
you wonder what else has New Zealand gotten into internationally. Why do we still trust our government if they are capable of doing so much damage
to the

First Past The Post-Voting System
This essay explains four potential concerns about the American electoral system. First, this essay provides a summary of our current voting system.
Next, this essay explains four problems with First Past the Post Voting System. Finally, this essay explains the most democracy
–distorting concern, the
electoral college.
Summary of the Current VotingSystem: First Past the Post
The current voting system that is used in America, is the First Past the Post Voting (FPTP) System. There are two basic rules that ensure a winner in
this voting system. This first rule is that there is only one vote per citizen and the second rule is that who ever gets the most votes during the election,
wins or is elected president.
Concern One: Minority Rules The ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Concern Three: Gerrymandering The third concern with the FPTP Voting System is that creates gerrymandering. Gerrymandering is the redrawing
of electoral boundaries in order to increase a candidate's chance of winning an election (The Problems with FPTP Voting Explained Video). When
the population has moved and grown, to better represent the largest population, there is a redrawing of electoral boundaries. However, for a price
one can "turn a land slide victory by the way boundaries are set up" (Gerrymandering Explained Video). By packing a majority of one group together,
and spreading the rest out, it guarantees a win for one party.
Concern Four: The Spoiler Effect The fourth concern with FPTP Voting is the "Spoiler Effect". After a candidate has been in office for multiple years,
it is difficult for other candidates to enter the race. "The better a third–party candidate does, the more it hurts its own voters by guaranteeing loss for the
party they most agree with and a win for the party they most disagree with" (The Problems with First Past the Post Voting Explained Video). The First
Past the Post Voting (FPTP) System is not susceptible to new candidates (The Problems with FPTP Voting Explained

Voting System Flaws
Although I believe that the voting system has its flaws, I still consider voting as a very important privilege and a responsibility that citizens of every
democratic society should embrace. It is one of the ways people could influence a change in the country through electing the leaders who share similar
interests and views with them. Also, voting helps people express their stand on certain divisive issues, not just on electing new officials but also the
laws that are tackled in their own states.
Elections are not perfect but it has certain characteristics that I think is essential in preserving democracy. For instance, term limits serve as a
prevention for an elected leader to hold power longer than necessary. However, voting is not in favor of every citizen. In chapter 7 of We The People,
it talks about how participation in the government ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
I agree with the statement to some extent, but I believe that this election also showed the how every vote could affect the results. If the people who
voted for third parties voted differently, the outcome might not be the same considering how many states have had such small gaps in the votes.
Compared to other forms of participation, I believe that voting is easier than lobbying, protesting or volunteering. Voting costs less time than other
forms because the majority of the time spent on voting is just during the election or poll day, unlike the other forms that take days or even weeks of
constant commitment. It also produces instant results–most of the time, we know who won or lost the race at the end of the day. The other forms do
not guarantee change, whether for the better or for the worse, as fast as voting does. Regardless of its downsides, voting is still an important factor in
determining the next step a country will take and therefore I believe that every vote

Australia Compulsory Voting System
For the last few years of democratic history in Australia there has been much debate. One main focus of political debate has been the voting system
Australia currently uses. The majority of the country like the way we currently vote by using a however there is one major difference that sets us aside
from most democracy's. This is compulsory voting. The majority of major democracies around the world (United States of America and England) do
not enforce their citizens to vote. Although a democratic result will be achieved regardless of the voting system, people still argue that certain ways are
un democratic and un affective. So of course there are strengths and weaknesses of each system.
To help gain a better knowledge of the strengths and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The biggest 'western' country that enforces compulsory voting is Australia. The major strength of this particular voting method is of course the
numbers. As mentioned earlier 92% of Australia's voting population came and voted compared to Americas 41%. This obviously makes the result
more fair and democratic as it shows what the majority of the population want. On numerous occasions in recent history there have been numerous
attempts to accept voluntary voting and ditch compulsory, however every time the idea was ditched, mainly due to how successful it was working
but also because of the popularity and the social backing behind it. Another strength for compulsory voting is that it educates people on politics and
the policies each party applies. This comes in the sense that citizens, knowing they have to vote, will do research on each party gaining a better
understanding. For the people who are very uneducated on politics the possible idea of research can help them select the major or minor party they
want to back. A weakness of compulsory voting goes against the previous 'strength' this is that people who are uneducated in politics may just select
a random party that they know nothing about only so they don't get fined. This could be a party that the majority of the country's population dislike,
for Australia's example Pauline Hanson's one nation party. If every politically uneducated person in Australia was to do this it could pose an issue to
the people who actually know what they are doing and their votes. Some people believe that compulsory voting is wrong as it forces the citizens to do
something they don't want to do, which many people believe is

Voting System and U.s. Senator Essay
test From a newspaper editorial: [The recent use of mail ballots in Oregon's election of a U.S. senator has led some people to hail this as the wave
of the future in our democratic republic]. *[We do not share that enthusiasm].* *[The primary advantage of the mail ballot is that it requires little
time]* and [effort on the part of the voter]. [We think that also is a primary shortcoming of this process]. It is worth a little of both our time and our
energy to exercise the right to vote, and that personal investment should serve to make us a bit more conscious of the value of that opportunity. From
a newspaper editorial: [The recent use of mail ballots in Oregon's election of a U.S. senator has led some people to hail this as the wave... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
[We think that also is a primary shortcoming of this process]. It is worth a little of both our time and our energy to exercise the right to vote, and
that personal investment should serve to make us a bit more conscious of the value of that opportunity. From a newspaper editorial: [The recent
use of mail ballots in Oregon's election of a U.S. senator has led some people to hail this as the wave of the future in our democratic republic].
*[We do not share that enthusiasm].* *[The primary advantage of the mail ballot is that it requires little time]* and [effort on the part of the
voter]. [We think that also is a primary shortcoming of this process]. It is worth a little of both our time and our energy to exercise the right to
vote, and that personal investment should serve to make us a bit more conscious of the value of that opportunity. From a newspaper editorial: [The
recent use of mail ballots in Oregon's election of a U.S. senator has led some people to hail this as the wave of the future in our democratic republic].
*[We do not share that enthusiasm].* *[The primary advantage of the mail ballot is that it requires little time]* and [effort on the part of the
voter]. [We think that also is a primary shortcoming of this process]. It is worth a little of both our time and our energy to exercise the right to
vote, and that personal investment should serve to make us a bit more conscious of the value of that

Capstone Experience : The Traditional Voting System
Capstone Experience: Essay
The traditional voting system has cost a lot of money and resources and the process of applying modern technologies has created the voting system
easy and inexpensive method. The voters can cast their vote in an automated voting machine and there is no need of the service of clerks and certain
officials to manage the process of voting (Byrne, 2015).This move has created several changes in the society. The voters can cast their vote in a fast
and accurate manner. They can use their finger print or any other selected feature to prove their identity and cast the vote. This situation has created
more people to vote, so there will be total democracy in the election. As the voters have the opportunity to vote as they ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The user has to consider whether the available information is usable or not, because the collected data should be legal and accurate for the
application of the project. It is illegal and unethical to use data and information which do not qualify above requirements. The cost that has to be
allocated must be considered. The cost must be able to mage by the project manager and it should be a manageable one. The ownership of the data
should not be violated and the process of gathering data should not violate the rights of the employees. There are some other ethical considerations too.
The project manager must be aware of this and he should take all the measures to protect the ethical considerations of the people and the society
(Relkin, 2006). By considering the ethical standards of the society the manager can gain maximum advantage of the process of controlling the
employees and marinating the business in the perfect manner.
The project has given lot of experiences and skills to me and they have become very important to the future career. As one of the IT expert it has
become very important for me to get a significant amount of ideas in the project. The technological sides of the voting system are closely linked with the
information technology, so the experience in such a system can be considered as one of the great chances for the future opportunities.
I was able to gain lots of knowledge and experiences

The Campaign For A Better Voting System
Just a few weeks ago, if you were to turn on the TV, you 'd be bombarded with political advertising campaigns. During the height of a midterm election
season, campaign ads are just one demonstration of candidates pouring funds into their race with the hopes of creating name recognition and getting
our votes. Not all tactics of gaining votes are as transparent as witnessing a negative ad campaign; some unethical ways of gaining votes are rather
questionable, such as Gerrymandering. I wanted explore the basis behind gerrymandering and understand not only how it affects elections here in New
York, but nationwide as well; what has come from the races as we announce the winners of these elections and possible reform for a better voting
system in our country.
The term Gerrymandering is an interesting one to begin with. It is simply the practice of redrawing district lines in the attempts to establish a political
advantage for a particular party or group. This happens when the district lines are manipulated to create a partisan advantage. The term however, has a
negative connotation attached to it for the advantage that those in power benefit from the process and the consequential disadvantage that the minority
parties, the poor population, and the generally uninformed voters are put into with their muted votes. Our text book gives a funny anecdotal
entomology of Gerrymandering by telling us that the word was created in reaction to a redrawing of Massachusetts Congressional

Online Voting System
Resources Required:–
Development Tool:– PHP
Database– My Sql
Server– WAMP Server
INTRODUCTION–:
"ONLINE VOTING SYSTEM" is an online voting technique. It is based on the other online services like "ONLINE RESERVATION SYSTEM" .In
this system people who have citizenship of INDIA and whose age is above 18 years of any [censored] can give hisher vote online without going to
any polling booth. There is a DATABASE which is maintained by theELECTION COMMISION OF INDIA in which all the names of voter with
complete information is stored.
SCOPE–:
– This system will increase the voting percentage in India. – If high security is applied then it may reduce false vote.
WORKING–:
In "ONLINE VOTING SYSTEM" a voter can use hisher voting right online ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Voter's vote in a database.
Calculation of total number of votes.
Various operational works that are done in the system are:–
Recording information of the Voter in Voter database.
Checking of information filled by voter.
Discard the false information.
cach information is sent to ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA.
2.3 Project Requirements
Hardware Requirements (Processor RAM Disk Space)
Pentium II, Pentium III, Pentium IV, Higher 128 Mb or Higher 130 Mb
Software Requirements (Operating System Database)
Win–98, Win–XP, Linux, My SQL
2.4 User Characteristics

Every user should be: Comfortable with Internet Browser. He must have brief knowledge of voting system. He must also have basic knowledge of
English too.
2.5 Constraints gUI is only in English. Login and password is used for identification of Voter.
2.6 Definitions of problems
Not User Friendly: The existing system is not user friendly because the retrieval of data is very slow and data is not maintained efficiently.
Difficulty in report generating: We require more calculations to generate the final result so it is generated at the end of the session. And the voter not
get a single chance to change hisher vote.
Time consuming: Every work is done manually so we cannot generate report in the middle of the session or as per the requirement because it is very
time consuming.
CHAPTER–3
FEASIBILITY STUDY
Depending on the results of the initial investigation the survey is now expanded to a more

Changing Voting System In Canada
At this time, the Majority Liberal Government is looking into changing the voting system in Canada, moving away from a system that has led to their
victory many times in Canadian history. Canada utilizes the plurality election system, colloquially known as "First Past the Post" (FPtP) which is
named after a term used in English racing. The term FptP is quite literal in its name as the first party to reach the set amount of seats wins the right to
be the party to run Canada. There have been (get exact number) a few attempts at changing the system since democratic votes started in Canada.
However, it has never really became all that close to changing. Many believe that the voting process should be as representative to the people's votes as
possible, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It can vary between models, just as a plurality model may, however most models have voters cast two votes, one vote for the party and one for the
riding representative. The focus of this essay will be more on the New Zealand variation of the Mixed Member Proportional System, which works as
such:
It is a proportional system, which means that the proportion of votes a party gets will largely reflect the number of seats it has in parliament.
Each voter gets two votes.
The first vote is for the political party the voter chooses. This is called the party vote and largely decides the total number of seats each political party
gets in Parliament.
The second vote is to choose the MP the voter wants to represent the electorate they live in. This is called the electorate vote. The candidate who gets
the most votes wins. They do not have to get more than half the

The Current Plurality Voting System Essay
The current plurality voting system in Canada is regularly attacked for unfairly representing the popular vote and giving some parties a disproportionate
amount of legislative power while leaving others with none. Opponents contend that other electoral systems would be far superior and provide a better
democracy. Proportional representation (PR) is usually cited as the best alternative; the debate of proportional representation versus plurality often
hinges on the balance between fairness and efficiency. Without attempting the political calculus to determine the rate at which fairness should be
sacrificed for efficiency, this paper will address the very claim that PR is more fair than the plurality system. The proponents contend that PR is a more
accurate representation of the electorate 's vote, that no votes are wasted, and that the will of the people translates into government better than the
plurality system; however, the experience of New Zealand challenges that assertion. This paper will establish that the current plurality system produces
a government that is more effective, better represents the people, and is more transparent than the proposed alternatives, namely proportional
representation. The founding principles of democracy are the will of the people and the rule of law. The former meaning that the citizens ' beliefs,
desires, etc. are translated into the government. The latter meaning that all individuals have equality under the law and that each individual

What Are The Pros And Cons Of Voting System
In the United States, the bastion of democracy, all is not right with its voting system. Election after election voters are left dissatisfied. Voters feel like
they are stuck choosing between the lesser of two evils, instead of who they want to govern. This is not because of some giant collusion between the
rich or the illuminati to put who they want in power. It is the result of our voting methods that create a two–party system. Elections in America are
marked by polarization, gerrymandering, unfair representation, negative campaigns, and limited choice. There has to be a way to make American
elections better. Some believe that this way is ranked–choice voting.
The process of ranked choice voting is simple. On election day, voters put the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Simply put, gerrymandering is the act of politicians meddling in the redrawing of legislative districts to help their party and friends, and hurt the other
party and their enemies (FairVote). Our current, winner take all,voting system allows the gerrymandering we see today. In 2013, Republican
candidates for the New Jersey assembly won 51% of the vote, but only 32 (40%) of 80 seats. In 2014, Democratic U.S. House candidates won 57%
of votes in California's 53 U.S. House races, but 74% of seats (FairVote). The two most common methods used to gerrymander districts are cracking
and packing. Cracking is reducing the chance of an opponent winning by splitting up their voters into several districts, ensuring that they never reach a
plurality in any district. Packing buts all of the opposing party's voters into one district, ensuring that they will win a maximum of one district (Portland
Press). Ranked choice voting has two ways it attacks

Fptp Voting System Essay

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Melissa Daehn

More from Melissa Daehn (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Fptp Voting System Essay