SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 19
Download to read offline
Design and Conduct
              of
       BA/BE Studies
Central Drug Standard Control Organization’
Different Types of Studies :
 Pharmacokinetic Studies.

 Pharmacodynamic Studies.

 Comparative Clinical trials

 In-vitro studies.
Pharmacokinetic Studies.

  1.   Study design.
  2.   Study population.
  3.   Study condition.
  4.   Characteristics to be investigated.
  5.   Bioanalytical methodology.
  6.   Statistic evaluation
  7.   Sp. consideration for modified release drug product.
1.Study design.
     ? To be answered.
     Nature of I.P.
     Evaluation method.
     Benefits/risk.
     Design
       period, phases, sequences & washout period.
       other designs.
   Single dose studies demand steady state for:
       Dose or time dependency, modified release products,
        plasma concentration, intra-individual variability.
2.Study population.
       Selection of number of subjects
       •Error variance with 1o characteristics
       •Significance value should be 0.05.
       •Expected deviations.
       •Power
       •Number of subjects (min 16).
       •Sp. Cases     se in subjects.




                           Selection criteria of subjects.
                           •To minimize the intra and inter subject variability.
                           •Risk to women
                           •For elderly subjects (60 years or more)
                           •Sex ratio.
                           •Narrowing the subjects.
                           • Risk of toxicity.




         Genetic phenotyping.
         •Considered for exploratory bioavailability for crossover and II studies.
         •Genetic polymorphism.
3.Steady State Studies.
      Selection of Blood Sampling Points.
      •Single dose-immediate release product -3 ½ lifes.
      •Sampling Points-
       •3 During Absorption Phase
       •3-4 During Projected Tmax.
       •4 During Elimination Phase.
      •Interval Between two Sampling Points- not over ½ hour.
      •Urine analysis.



                 Fasting and Fed State Considerations.
                 •Fasting State:
                  •Single Dose -Fasting (10+4) hours
                  •Multiple dose- Fasting (2 ) hours before and after dose.
                 • Fed State: Drug Under Fed State/modified release product.
                 •Fed state is maintain by High fat breakfast (950-1000 Kcal.)
                  15 min before dose.



       Steady State Studies.
       •Long Elimination ½ life and single dose blood concentration is not maintained
       •Assay sensitivity.
       •Compulsion of Cytotoxic Drugs.
       •Modified release products to see dosage fluctuations in plasma.
       •Drugs with intrinsic capabilities like their own metabolism.
       •Enteric-coated preparations where coating is innovative.
       •Combination products.
       •Drugs with non-linear pharmacokinetics.
       •Drugs likely to accumulate in body.
4.Characteristics to be Investigated.
              BA/BE evaluation other than
                  Biological Matrix.
        • Concentration of drug/ metabolite is Low in Biological
          matrix.

        • Limitation of Analytical method.

        • Unstable or stable Drugs / metabolites.

        • Drugs with short half Life.

        • In Case of Prodrugs.

        • Intrinsic Characteristics of drug like spatial arrangement
          i.e. racemate mixtures ( where achirality assay should be
          performed).
5.Bioanalytical Methodology
            {A} Pre-Study Phase

            Stability of Drug/ Metabolites in BM.
            •Standard Condition for experiment.
            •Freezing and Thawing data.


                              Specificity/Selectivity.
                              •Integrity of assay


                              Sensitivity.
                              •Capacity of test procedure.


                    Steady State Studies.
                    •Elimination ½ life and single concentration is not maintained
                    •Assay sensitivity.



          Precision and Accuracy.
          •Precision by replicate assay at several concentrations.
          •Accuracy atleast 3 concentrations(low, medium, high).
5.Bioanalytical Methodology
          {A} Pre-Study Phase

           Recovery.
          •Documentation of concentration (High, medium, low).
          •If low recovery, alternative method of Investigation.



                   Range and Linearity.
                   • Quantitative Relation between concentration and
                     response.
                   • Linear relation by standard curve with 5 concentrations



          Analytical System Stability.
          •Assay Precision should be monitored.
          •Analytical standard at start and end of assays.
5.Bioanalytical Methodology
          {B} Study Phase

           * Acceptable variability :
                       “Analysis of biological samples can
          be done by single determination without need of
          reanalysis.”

          * Duplicate analysis as per case to case.

          * Standard curve for each analyte & used for
          unknown sample analyte concentration.

          * No extrapolation of unknown sample.

          * Instead re-determine Std. Curve or re-analyze
          sample after dilution.

          * Quality control sample accept/reject.
5.Bioanalytical Methodology
           {C} Quality Control Samples

           * QCS:
                        “Samples with known concentration
           prepared by spiking biological fluid with drug.”

           * QCS and Standard Samples preparation at
           different concentrations..

           * QCS with stable analyte preparation in fluid of
           interest.

           * Less stable analyte preparation daily/weekly.

           * QCS concentration assays with study
           concentration and reference concentration to that
           days calibration standard.

           * Batch reanalysis if control sample are within
            ± 15 of expected concentration.
6.Statistical Evaluation.
                  :Data Analysis:
 * Primary concern in BE assessment is to limit consumer’s
 risk and minimize manufacturer’s risk.


          :Deviation from Study Plan:
         * Method of analysis should be defined in the
         protocol.

         * Method of handling drop-outs and for handling
         biologically implausible outlier should be
         mentioned.

         * Post hoc exclusion of outlier is not
         recommended.

         * Scientific explanation for volunteer exclusion is
         needed
6.Statistical Evaluation
                :Statistical Analysis:
 • SOP in protocol & BE should lead symmetry in two
   formulation.

 • It should account the source of variations.

 • 90% confidence interval for population means or 5%
   significance level for parameter under consideration.

 • Logarithmic transformation for Cmax and AUC before
   statistical analysis. But not recommended.

 • Tmax analysis if clinically relevant, using non-parametric
   methods.
6.Statistical Evaluation
        :Criteria for Bioequivalence:
 • BE range 80-125% to obtain 90% confidence interval, which
   is equivalent to rejection of two one sided t-test with null
   hypothesis of non-equivalence at 5% significance.

 • Permissible difference in bioavailability:
   • Narrow therapeutic index.
   • A serious dose related toxicity.
   • A steep dose/effect curve.
   • Non-linear pharmacokinetic within therapeutic range.

 • Suprabioavailability:
   • Need of reformulation with fresh BE study or
   • Clinical data supporting the application.
7.Sp.Considerations for Modified
        Release Product.
           General.

           • MRP Include delayed , sustained, immediate + sustained
             delayed + sustained, immediate + delayed.

           • The Product Should:
             • Act as Modified release & claim label.
             • Preclude dose dumping effect.
             • Provide therapeutic performance.
             • Produce plasma level for proposed dosing interval at steady
               state.
           • .




                 Study Parameters
                 • BA should be obtained.
                 • Factor consideration: First market entry and Extent of
                   accumulation.

             Study Design.
             • Single and Single + Multiple dose depending on accumulation,
               both in fasting and non-fasting state.
             • Effect of food on reference:
               • If known- two way crossover and
               • If not known –three way crossover which include:
                 • --Reference in fasting state.
                 • --test in fasting state.
                 • --test in fed state
Pharmacodynamic Studies.
     Healthy or patients may be used.
     Necessary if quantitative analysis of drug (s) or their metabolites in plasma
      or urine is not possible.
     Required if drug concentration is not surrogate endpoint for efficacy and
      safety demonstration.


        Requirements while Planning, Conducting and
             Assessing Pharmacodynamic Studies.
  •   Response should claim efficacy and or safety.
  •   Method validation for precision, accuracy and specificity.
  •   Investigation of Dose response: should not be maximal of test & reference.
  •   Quantitative measurement of response under double blind condition and
       recorded with instruments which act as substitute of plasma concentration.
  •   Non responder should be excluded prior to screening .
  •   Crossover or parallel design should be used.
  •   Statistical considerations for assessment.
Comparative Clinical Studies.

Items to be defined in the protocol in advance:
   • Target parameters that represent the clinical
     endpoints from which intensity
     and onset of action can be derived.
   • Size of acceptance range.
   • Statistical method of analysis should be defined.
   • Whenever applicable placebo design should be
     defined.
   • Include safety endpoints.
In Vitro-Studies.

Dissolution Studies:
   • Carried out under mild condition at 370 ± 0.5 and
     at physiological pH.
   • More than 1 batch should be tested.
   • Comparative dissolution profile rather than single.
   • Design:
      • Individual testing of 12 dosage units of each batch where
          mean and individual results should be reported.
      • % of nominal content released at spaced time to achieve
          virtual complete dissolution.
      • Dissolution profile in 3 aq media (1-6.8 or upto 8 pH).
      • Same apparatus if possible on same or consecutive days.
By: Musale M.D. MSc. Clinical Research –Ist year.
  “School of Biomedicalsciences, Aurangabad”
   MGM’s University of Health Sciences,
   Navi Mumbai.
E. Mail : mgmmusale@gmail.com

More Related Content

What's hot

Bioequivalence and drug product assessment
Bioequivalence and drug product assessmentBioequivalence and drug product assessment
Bioequivalence and drug product assessment
Gauravchaudhary199
 
Track 9-1 Designing of bioequivalence studies of anticancer products Protocol...
Track 9-1 Designing of bioequivalence studies of anticancer products Protocol...Track 9-1 Designing of bioequivalence studies of anticancer products Protocol...
Track 9-1 Designing of bioequivalence studies of anticancer products Protocol...
Vikas Kumar, M. Pharm., M.B.A, PMP
 
Bioavailability and bioequivalance studies
Bioavailability and bioequivalance studiesBioavailability and bioequivalance studies
Bioavailability and bioequivalance studies
Rph Supriya Upadhyay
 
Regulatory aspect 112070804011
Regulatory aspect  112070804011Regulatory aspect  112070804011
Regulatory aspect 112070804011
Patel Parth
 
Bioavailability and bioequivalence new 11a
Bioavailability and bioequivalence new 11aBioavailability and bioequivalence new 11a
Bioavailability and bioequivalence new 11a
Shyam Mandal
 
Bioequivalence and drug product assessment
Bioequivalence and drug product assessmentBioequivalence and drug product assessment
Bioequivalence and drug product assessment
DipakKumarGupta3
 
Bioequivalence 112070804009
Bioequivalence  112070804009Bioequivalence  112070804009
Bioequivalence 112070804009
Patel Parth
 

What's hot (20)

BIOEQUIVALAENCE STUDIES
BIOEQUIVALAENCE STUDIESBIOEQUIVALAENCE STUDIES
BIOEQUIVALAENCE STUDIES
 
Parameters to evaluate Bioequivalence
Parameters to evaluate BioequivalenceParameters to evaluate Bioequivalence
Parameters to evaluate Bioequivalence
 
bioequivalence studies - advanced biopharmaceutics
bioequivalence studies - advanced biopharmaceuticsbioequivalence studies - advanced biopharmaceutics
bioequivalence studies - advanced biopharmaceutics
 
Bio-equivalence and Bio-similarity studies of Drugs
Bio-equivalence and Bio-similarity studies of DrugsBio-equivalence and Bio-similarity studies of Drugs
Bio-equivalence and Bio-similarity studies of Drugs
 
Bioavability and Bioequalance
Bioavability and BioequalanceBioavability and Bioequalance
Bioavability and Bioequalance
 
bioavailability and bioequivalence
bioavailability and bioequivalencebioavailability and bioequivalence
bioavailability and bioequivalence
 
Bioequivalence and drug product assessment
Bioequivalence and drug product assessmentBioequivalence and drug product assessment
Bioequivalence and drug product assessment
 
Bioavailability and Bioequivalence
Bioavailability and BioequivalenceBioavailability and Bioequivalence
Bioavailability and Bioequivalence
 
Bioequivalence Studies
Bioequivalence StudiesBioequivalence Studies
Bioequivalence Studies
 
Track 9-1 Designing of bioequivalence studies of anticancer products Protocol...
Track 9-1 Designing of bioequivalence studies of anticancer products Protocol...Track 9-1 Designing of bioequivalence studies of anticancer products Protocol...
Track 9-1 Designing of bioequivalence studies of anticancer products Protocol...
 
Bioavailability and bioequivalance studies
Bioavailability and bioequivalance studiesBioavailability and bioequivalance studies
Bioavailability and bioequivalance studies
 
Regulatory aspect 112070804011
Regulatory aspect  112070804011Regulatory aspect  112070804011
Regulatory aspect 112070804011
 
FOOD EFFECTS In BA & BE STUDy dhara
FOOD EFFECTS In BA & BE STUDy dharaFOOD EFFECTS In BA & BE STUDy dhara
FOOD EFFECTS In BA & BE STUDy dhara
 
Bioavailability and bioequivalence new 11a
Bioavailability and bioequivalence new 11aBioavailability and bioequivalence new 11a
Bioavailability and bioequivalence new 11a
 
Bioequivalence studies
Bioequivalence studiesBioequivalence studies
Bioequivalence studies
 
Significance of BA/BE studies in drug research and evaluation of different as...
Significance of BA/BE studies in drug research and evaluation of different as...Significance of BA/BE studies in drug research and evaluation of different as...
Significance of BA/BE studies in drug research and evaluation of different as...
 
Bioequivalence and drug product assessment
Bioequivalence and drug product assessmentBioequivalence and drug product assessment
Bioequivalence and drug product assessment
 
Bioequivalence 112070804009
Bioequivalence  112070804009Bioequivalence  112070804009
Bioequivalence 112070804009
 
Biopharmacy
BiopharmacyBiopharmacy
Biopharmacy
 
Bioequivalence studies
Bioequivalence studiesBioequivalence studies
Bioequivalence studies
 

Viewers also liked

Investigational new drug application new
Investigational new drug application newInvestigational new drug application new
Investigational new drug application new
Aakrati Gupta
 
Bulk active post approval changes
Bulk active post approval changesBulk active post approval changes
Bulk active post approval changes
bdvfgbdhg
 
Central drug standard control organisation
Central drug standard control organisationCentral drug standard control organisation
Central drug standard control organisation
bdvfgbdhg
 
Scale up and post approval changes(supac)
Scale up and post approval changes(supac)Scale up and post approval changes(supac)
Scale up and post approval changes(supac)
bdvfgbdhg
 
Ind (investigational new drug application) and nda
Ind (investigational new drug application) and ndaInd (investigational new drug application) and nda
Ind (investigational new drug application) and nda
swati2084
 

Viewers also liked (6)

Investigational new drug application new
Investigational new drug application newInvestigational new drug application new
Investigational new drug application new
 
Indian gcp ppt cr by ann
Indian gcp ppt cr by annIndian gcp ppt cr by ann
Indian gcp ppt cr by ann
 
Bulk active post approval changes
Bulk active post approval changesBulk active post approval changes
Bulk active post approval changes
 
Central drug standard control organisation
Central drug standard control organisationCentral drug standard control organisation
Central drug standard control organisation
 
Scale up and post approval changes(supac)
Scale up and post approval changes(supac)Scale up and post approval changes(supac)
Scale up and post approval changes(supac)
 
Ind (investigational new drug application) and nda
Ind (investigational new drug application) and ndaInd (investigational new drug application) and nda
Ind (investigational new drug application) and nda
 

Similar to MM.Presentation of CDSCO

biopharmaceutics ohhhvcc vvcghhccgg.pptx
biopharmaceutics ohhhvcc vvcghhccgg.pptxbiopharmaceutics ohhhvcc vvcghhccgg.pptx
biopharmaceutics ohhhvcc vvcghhccgg.pptx
SuvojitBasak1
 

Similar to MM.Presentation of CDSCO (20)

Bioequivalence studies
Bioequivalence studiesBioequivalence studies
Bioequivalence studies
 
Bioequivalence study
Bioequivalence studyBioequivalence study
Bioequivalence study
 
Bioanalytical method validation usfda
Bioanalytical method validation usfdaBioanalytical method validation usfda
Bioanalytical method validation usfda
 
Special concerns in bioavaliblity and bioeqvivalence
Special concerns in bioavaliblity and bioeqvivalenceSpecial concerns in bioavaliblity and bioeqvivalence
Special concerns in bioavaliblity and bioeqvivalence
 
trial and protocol design
trial and protocol design trial and protocol design
trial and protocol design
 
Bioanalytical method validation emea
Bioanalytical method validation emeaBioanalytical method validation emea
Bioanalytical method validation emea
 
Bioavailability and bioequivalance studies and Regulatory aspects
Bioavailability and bioequivalance studies and Regulatory aspectsBioavailability and bioequivalance studies and Regulatory aspects
Bioavailability and bioequivalance studies and Regulatory aspects
 
Bioavailability And Bioequivalence
Bioavailability And BioequivalenceBioavailability And Bioequivalence
Bioavailability And Bioequivalence
 
toxicokinetics and saturation kinetics
toxicokinetics and saturation kineticstoxicokinetics and saturation kinetics
toxicokinetics and saturation kinetics
 
biopharmaceutics ohhhvcc vvcghhccgg.pptx
biopharmaceutics ohhhvcc vvcghhccgg.pptxbiopharmaceutics ohhhvcc vvcghhccgg.pptx
biopharmaceutics ohhhvcc vvcghhccgg.pptx
 
Bioavailability and bioeqivalance testing
Bioavailability and bioeqivalance testing Bioavailability and bioeqivalance testing
Bioavailability and bioeqivalance testing
 
10th VOF - 11.2 Bioequivalence..pptx
10th VOF - 11.2 Bioequivalence..pptx10th VOF - 11.2 Bioequivalence..pptx
10th VOF - 11.2 Bioequivalence..pptx
 
Biopharmaceutics Applications in drug studies
Biopharmaceutics Applications in drug studiesBiopharmaceutics Applications in drug studies
Biopharmaceutics Applications in drug studies
 
10th VOF - 11.2 Bioequivalence..pptx
10th VOF - 11.2 Bioequivalence..pptx10th VOF - 11.2 Bioequivalence..pptx
10th VOF - 11.2 Bioequivalence..pptx
 
Clinical Development of Biosimilars
Clinical Development of Biosimilars Clinical Development of Biosimilars
Clinical Development of Biosimilars
 
Clinical Research, A Basic Understanding...........
Clinical Research, A Basic Understanding...........Clinical Research, A Basic Understanding...........
Clinical Research, A Basic Understanding...........
 
1.BIOEQUIVALENCE AND DRUG PRODUCT ASSESSMENT.pptx
1.BIOEQUIVALENCE AND DRUG PRODUCT ASSESSMENT.pptx1.BIOEQUIVALENCE AND DRUG PRODUCT ASSESSMENT.pptx
1.BIOEQUIVALENCE AND DRUG PRODUCT ASSESSMENT.pptx
 
PreClinical Development_Final_clinical.pdf
PreClinical Development_Final_clinical.pdfPreClinical Development_Final_clinical.pdf
PreClinical Development_Final_clinical.pdf
 
Study Design in Bioequivalence Studies.pptx
Study Design in Bioequivalence Studies.pptxStudy Design in Bioequivalence Studies.pptx
Study Design in Bioequivalence Studies.pptx
 
Pharmacokinetic trials
Pharmacokinetic trialsPharmacokinetic trials
Pharmacokinetic trials
 

MM.Presentation of CDSCO

  • 1. Design and Conduct of BA/BE Studies Central Drug Standard Control Organization’
  • 2. Different Types of Studies :  Pharmacokinetic Studies.  Pharmacodynamic Studies.  Comparative Clinical trials  In-vitro studies.
  • 3. Pharmacokinetic Studies. 1. Study design. 2. Study population. 3. Study condition. 4. Characteristics to be investigated. 5. Bioanalytical methodology. 6. Statistic evaluation 7. Sp. consideration for modified release drug product.
  • 4. 1.Study design.  ? To be answered.  Nature of I.P.  Evaluation method.  Benefits/risk.  Design  period, phases, sequences & washout period.  other designs.  Single dose studies demand steady state for:  Dose or time dependency, modified release products, plasma concentration, intra-individual variability.
  • 5. 2.Study population. Selection of number of subjects •Error variance with 1o characteristics •Significance value should be 0.05. •Expected deviations. •Power •Number of subjects (min 16). •Sp. Cases se in subjects. Selection criteria of subjects. •To minimize the intra and inter subject variability. •Risk to women •For elderly subjects (60 years or more) •Sex ratio. •Narrowing the subjects. • Risk of toxicity. Genetic phenotyping. •Considered for exploratory bioavailability for crossover and II studies. •Genetic polymorphism.
  • 6. 3.Steady State Studies. Selection of Blood Sampling Points. •Single dose-immediate release product -3 ½ lifes. •Sampling Points- •3 During Absorption Phase •3-4 During Projected Tmax. •4 During Elimination Phase. •Interval Between two Sampling Points- not over ½ hour. •Urine analysis. Fasting and Fed State Considerations. •Fasting State: •Single Dose -Fasting (10+4) hours •Multiple dose- Fasting (2 ) hours before and after dose. • Fed State: Drug Under Fed State/modified release product. •Fed state is maintain by High fat breakfast (950-1000 Kcal.) 15 min before dose. Steady State Studies. •Long Elimination ½ life and single dose blood concentration is not maintained •Assay sensitivity. •Compulsion of Cytotoxic Drugs. •Modified release products to see dosage fluctuations in plasma. •Drugs with intrinsic capabilities like their own metabolism. •Enteric-coated preparations where coating is innovative. •Combination products. •Drugs with non-linear pharmacokinetics. •Drugs likely to accumulate in body.
  • 7. 4.Characteristics to be Investigated. BA/BE evaluation other than Biological Matrix. • Concentration of drug/ metabolite is Low in Biological matrix. • Limitation of Analytical method. • Unstable or stable Drugs / metabolites. • Drugs with short half Life. • In Case of Prodrugs. • Intrinsic Characteristics of drug like spatial arrangement i.e. racemate mixtures ( where achirality assay should be performed).
  • 8. 5.Bioanalytical Methodology {A} Pre-Study Phase Stability of Drug/ Metabolites in BM. •Standard Condition for experiment. •Freezing and Thawing data. Specificity/Selectivity. •Integrity of assay Sensitivity. •Capacity of test procedure. Steady State Studies. •Elimination ½ life and single concentration is not maintained •Assay sensitivity. Precision and Accuracy. •Precision by replicate assay at several concentrations. •Accuracy atleast 3 concentrations(low, medium, high).
  • 9. 5.Bioanalytical Methodology {A} Pre-Study Phase Recovery. •Documentation of concentration (High, medium, low). •If low recovery, alternative method of Investigation. Range and Linearity. • Quantitative Relation between concentration and response. • Linear relation by standard curve with 5 concentrations Analytical System Stability. •Assay Precision should be monitored. •Analytical standard at start and end of assays.
  • 10. 5.Bioanalytical Methodology {B} Study Phase * Acceptable variability : “Analysis of biological samples can be done by single determination without need of reanalysis.” * Duplicate analysis as per case to case. * Standard curve for each analyte & used for unknown sample analyte concentration. * No extrapolation of unknown sample. * Instead re-determine Std. Curve or re-analyze sample after dilution. * Quality control sample accept/reject.
  • 11. 5.Bioanalytical Methodology {C} Quality Control Samples * QCS: “Samples with known concentration prepared by spiking biological fluid with drug.” * QCS and Standard Samples preparation at different concentrations.. * QCS with stable analyte preparation in fluid of interest. * Less stable analyte preparation daily/weekly. * QCS concentration assays with study concentration and reference concentration to that days calibration standard. * Batch reanalysis if control sample are within ± 15 of expected concentration.
  • 12. 6.Statistical Evaluation. :Data Analysis: * Primary concern in BE assessment is to limit consumer’s risk and minimize manufacturer’s risk. :Deviation from Study Plan: * Method of analysis should be defined in the protocol. * Method of handling drop-outs and for handling biologically implausible outlier should be mentioned. * Post hoc exclusion of outlier is not recommended. * Scientific explanation for volunteer exclusion is needed
  • 13. 6.Statistical Evaluation :Statistical Analysis: • SOP in protocol & BE should lead symmetry in two formulation. • It should account the source of variations. • 90% confidence interval for population means or 5% significance level for parameter under consideration. • Logarithmic transformation for Cmax and AUC before statistical analysis. But not recommended. • Tmax analysis if clinically relevant, using non-parametric methods.
  • 14. 6.Statistical Evaluation :Criteria for Bioequivalence: • BE range 80-125% to obtain 90% confidence interval, which is equivalent to rejection of two one sided t-test with null hypothesis of non-equivalence at 5% significance. • Permissible difference in bioavailability: • Narrow therapeutic index. • A serious dose related toxicity. • A steep dose/effect curve. • Non-linear pharmacokinetic within therapeutic range. • Suprabioavailability: • Need of reformulation with fresh BE study or • Clinical data supporting the application.
  • 15. 7.Sp.Considerations for Modified Release Product. General. • MRP Include delayed , sustained, immediate + sustained delayed + sustained, immediate + delayed. • The Product Should: • Act as Modified release & claim label. • Preclude dose dumping effect. • Provide therapeutic performance. • Produce plasma level for proposed dosing interval at steady state. • . Study Parameters • BA should be obtained. • Factor consideration: First market entry and Extent of accumulation. Study Design. • Single and Single + Multiple dose depending on accumulation, both in fasting and non-fasting state. • Effect of food on reference: • If known- two way crossover and • If not known –three way crossover which include: • --Reference in fasting state. • --test in fasting state. • --test in fed state
  • 16. Pharmacodynamic Studies.  Healthy or patients may be used.  Necessary if quantitative analysis of drug (s) or their metabolites in plasma or urine is not possible.  Required if drug concentration is not surrogate endpoint for efficacy and safety demonstration. Requirements while Planning, Conducting and Assessing Pharmacodynamic Studies. • Response should claim efficacy and or safety. • Method validation for precision, accuracy and specificity. • Investigation of Dose response: should not be maximal of test & reference. • Quantitative measurement of response under double blind condition and recorded with instruments which act as substitute of plasma concentration. • Non responder should be excluded prior to screening . • Crossover or parallel design should be used. • Statistical considerations for assessment.
  • 17. Comparative Clinical Studies. Items to be defined in the protocol in advance: • Target parameters that represent the clinical endpoints from which intensity and onset of action can be derived. • Size of acceptance range. • Statistical method of analysis should be defined. • Whenever applicable placebo design should be defined. • Include safety endpoints.
  • 18. In Vitro-Studies. Dissolution Studies: • Carried out under mild condition at 370 ± 0.5 and at physiological pH. • More than 1 batch should be tested. • Comparative dissolution profile rather than single. • Design: • Individual testing of 12 dosage units of each batch where mean and individual results should be reported. • % of nominal content released at spaced time to achieve virtual complete dissolution. • Dissolution profile in 3 aq media (1-6.8 or upto 8 pH). • Same apparatus if possible on same or consecutive days.
  • 19. By: Musale M.D. MSc. Clinical Research –Ist year. “School of Biomedicalsciences, Aurangabad” MGM’s University of Health Sciences, Navi Mumbai. E. Mail : mgmmusale@gmail.com