This does not have to be in a paper format but does have to include sites if used and quality references (no wikipedia types). Most people, most of the time, know their own national history better than they know that of other nations, even their neighboring nations. Even though we know our own history better than that of others, we often learned it during our secondary education through factual information about dates, places, and leading personalities.   The study of history is much more than memorizing sets of facts and inferences based on facts. The boundary of what constitutes history is a vague one, and it is driven by the broad or narrow viewpoint that is chosen by authors. Every author has a viewpoint, and the authors are motivated to research and write by considerations that are often not made known but which are operating nonetheless. The boundary also intersects a great many academic disciplines to establish the context in which the facts occur and the factors operate.  As viewpoints drive authors, so our own viewpoints drive our work as readers and discoverers. As people of "the West," our perspective is limited by our own experience of living in our own time and place  – limits known individually as persons, and collectively as citizens of nations. We discover just how foreign we are as Westerners when we venture across boundaries of time, distance, culture, and language to learn about what happened overseas. What a telling word "overseas" is!  So, let's go on a treasure hunt.  What do we need to know that we do not (yet!) know in order to make progress as we begin our study of Vietnam and the 20th-century experience? What do we need to know and discover in order to analyze the history in an expansive sense of that part of Southeast Asia that became known as French Indochina a half century ago?  DO include the URL (web address) that you took the information from. (Hit enter after pasting in the URL and it will become a hyperlink to the source for other students). DO include quotation marks or " " around quoted (i.e. copied and pasted) material. DO introduce the quoted material with YOUR OWN WORDS about why you are providing that quotation. DO limit the quoted material to a paragraph or less (a snippet ) to entice the reader into following the URL (link) you then provide. DO use an 80/20 rule of thumb for posting. That is, for every sentence of quoted material you should give us at least four sentences from you. Good practice is that you AT LEAST give us a few sentences to orient us to why this quote is appropriately contained in your post. Worst case: use a 50/50 rule but in no event should you simply copy and paste in paragraphs from a website with no orienting material from you. As the % of your words to quoted material decreases, so too will the value of the post decrease. .

1. This does not have to be in a paper format but does have to
include sites if used and quality references (no wikipedia
types).
Most people, most of the time, know their own national history
better than they know that of other nations, even their
neighboring nations. Even though we know our own history
better than that of others, we often learned it during our
secondary education through factual information about dates,
places, and leading personalities.
The study of history is much more than memorizing sets of facts
and inferences based on facts. The boundary of what constitutes
history is a vague one, and it is driven by the broad or narrow
viewpoint that is chosen by authors. Every author has a
viewpoint, and the authors are motivated to research and write
by considerations that are often not made known but which are
operating nonetheless. The boundary also intersects a great
many academic disciplines to establish the context in which the
facts occur and the factors operate.
As viewpoints drive authors, so our own viewpoints drive our
work as readers and discoverers. As people of "the West," our
perspective is limited by our own experience of living in our
own time and place
–
limits known individually as persons, and collectively as
citizens of nations. We discover just how foreign we are as
Westerners when we venture across boundaries of time,
distance, culture, and language to learn about what happened
overseas. What a telling word "overseas" is!
So, let's go on a treasure hunt.
What do we need to know that we do not (yet!) know in order to
make progress as we begin our study of Vietnam and the 20th-
century experience? What do we need to know and discover in
order to analyze the history in an expansive sense of that part of

2. Southeast Asia that became known as French Indochina a half
century ago?
DO include the URL (web address) that you took the
information from. (Hit enter after pasting in the URL and it will
become a hyperlink to the source for other students).
DO include quotation marks or " " around quoted (i.e. copied
and pasted) material.
DO introduce the quoted material with YOUR OWN WORDS
about why you are providing that quotation.
DO limit the quoted material to a paragraph or less (a snippet )
to entice the reader into following the URL (link) you then
provide.
DO use an 80/20 rule of thumb for posting. That is, for every
sentence of quoted material you should give us at least four
sentences from you. Good practice is that you AT LEAST give
us a few sentences to orient us to why this quote is
appropriately contained in your post. Worst case: use a 50/50
rule but in no event should you simply copy and paste in
paragraphs from a website with no orienting material from you.
As the % of your words to quoted material decreases, so too
will the value of the post decrease.