Government Roles In Government

Government Roles In Government
Ramona Salvarez:
How is your role in government different from an elected official?
1. My role in government is to overlook cases and evaluate evidence. I make sure that the facts
giving are accurate and that everything is presented fairly and unbiased. Judges serve the people
while we are appointed by the president rather than the people.
I see the differences that you present, but what about their similarities, what makes them alike
(judges and elected officials)?
2. There are many things that make us the alike. We serve for the same purpose, to help the people.
Do you think judges should be elected or appointed by the government and president?
3. I do not think judges should be elected, simply because when people vote they tend to vote
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

The Importance Of Government
Government is something that every country needs. Without government there would complete
anarchy. Anarchy doesn't work because citizens can't be completely free to do whatever they want.
One of the main reasons that government is a necessity is because the government needs to set in
stone, laws that the citizens must abide to. We need rules and laws in a country, because without
them people would be free to use and take advantage of each other. We also need the government,
because we need to be able to communicate and organize sessions with other countries in order to
resolve conflicts, or talk economics/trading. We the people have always had some form of
government leading us in the United States, and without one we wouldn't know how to handle
situations. It's important for a country to have decently strict immigration laws. Accepting a bunch
of foreigners into the country can actually be risky due to not knowing their previous way of life or
beliefs. The Government must provide several required services to the people. The Government
must provide a well trained police force system to protect everyday citizens from crime. Related to
that subject the government must provide a good court, and jail system to handle possible convicts.
Every country also should have a good education system. The future of each and every country
depends on the younger generation. Another service that the government must provide is a fire
department. Without fire departments many people could lose

Purpose Of The Government
The purpose of the Government is to protect the rights of the citizens by making laws for the
citizens and also make them obey the laws. It is important for the Government to exist is because to
run the country and also maintain peace between the states and people. The government is there to
listen to its citizens and their needs. It gives the citizens freedom of speech, religion, assembly and
the right to petition. For example, Being a country with various types of religions or races the
government is there to give all of them equal rights and keeping them in one unity. It's also there to
give justice to its people by punishing the criminals and also there to treat the citizens fairly. If the
government didn't exist in the US it would have

Spartan Government Vs Athenian Government
The diversity of the structures and culture of the Greek society led to a great variation in the ways
and conditions of living from city to city. The citizens of Sparta and Athens, the two largest city–
states then differed in everything, except Each city has its specificity, which it adheres to and
distinguishes it from other city–states. Only government systems. Despite the commonalities and
differences between the systems of government in the Greek cities. the free citizens of these cities
were changing the regimes and their rulers. In an attempt to find a solution to the problem of
governance and to answer the puzzling questions. Who governs and how. The king or the people.
Does sovereignty derive from the rule of law and norms or the constitution? ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
Aristocratic families enjoyed considerable wealth, especially in the Attica area, where Athenians
discovered silver. In Athens, as in other Greek city–states, political power was in the hands of
several large aristocratic families which controlled large areas of Attica (Agathe, n.d). Political
office was linked to land property and military professionalism, and most of the Attica's people had
no role in the political life. ''Appointment to the supreme offices of state went by birth and wealth,
and they were held at first for life, and afterward for a term of ten years'' (Agathe, n.d, p. 2). While
Aristocratic families use their wealth and properties to get to the power and govern, there were other
Greek people who took the power unconstitutionally to

Canadian Government Vs Spartan Government
One of the main ways Spartans and Canadians were similar was in their form of government. Both
Spartans and Canadians had an assembly, whose members were elected by people. However, the
Spartan government was usually classified as an "oligarchy". It is a small group of people having
control of the country, organization, and institution. The ancient Spartan government was ruled by
two kings, who ruled until they died or were forced out of the office. Women did not participate in
the political life of Sparta. Canada is a constitutional monarchy which is a system of government by
the whole population typically through elected representatives. Unlike the Spartan government,
women have the rights to vote and are part of the governor. In addition,

Government Of Florida, A State Government Essay
This case study will assess the government of Florida, a state government. It will touch on several
important issues such as providing a general overview of how the government functions and what
resources it provides, as well as some current issues the State of Florida is facing in government
administration. Because the State of Florida is a state government, it tends to "resemble the national
government in composition and organization of their executive branch agencies" (Milakovich, 2013,
p. 21).
The work and services provided by the State of Florida include services for children and families,
such as services concerning adoption, child abuse, children with disabilities, food stamps, and
marriage/divorce. They also provide services involving colleges and universities, courts and
corrections, environmental and wildlife preservation/protection, healthcare administration, highway
patrol and safety, utility regulations, transportation, revenue (taxes), and a host of other areas. In
order to pay for all of the services which they provide, Governor Rick Scott has created a budget of
$78.4 billion for the state of Florida in the 2015–2016 fiscal year (Scott, 2016, p. 13). This budget
also includes the employment of 113,687 people who compromise the total state workforce (Scott,
2016, p. 14).
A crucial role in the State of Florida is the role of citizen participation. Citizen participation and
community engagement play an extremely important part in a democratic

Essay Government
According to Hobbes the need to create a form of government arises from fulfilling the need of
security. In order for government to provide this security, it is necessary for government to be able to
use its authority in any way it pleases. Locke and Mill on the other hand believe that government
should be able to provide security for its citizens, but in order to do this government does not need
to be large rather it should be limited. Thus, the question arises of how limited government should
be in order to provide security. In this case, should government be able to use its authority in any
way it pleases as Hobbes argues or should there be a limit placed on governmental power as argued
by Locke and Mill? I believe that a powerful ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
However, Hobbes believes that in order for a form of government to be created we must assign a
single person to have authority (Hobbes 175). The sovereign, once assigned has total power –
absolute authority. It is only when we are willing to step out of the state of nature by giving
authority to an individual do we create a form of government. This constructs a trade off between
freedom and order. Hobbes says that in order for this trade off to be accomplished government needs
to be gigantic.
Mill, on the contrary, has a view of government that is similar to that of Locke's rather than that of
Hobbes. The difference between Mill and Locke or Hobbes is that for Mill the State of Nature does
not exist, that is to say that Mill assumes that authority has already and always existed (Mill 631).
The way government should operate and how it should be run is where Hobbes, Locke and Mill
differ. Hobbes believes that basically equal makes unequal meaning that, one person should be the
sovereign and run government. Locke on the other hand believes that not a single person should be
in charge of government but rather a group. The power should be located in an institution rather than
a single person (Locke 313). For Mill on the other hand, it does not really matter who governs just
how much governing is being carried out. Hobbes believes that the ruler, in

Authoritative Government
People do not much like being told what to do; however, people elect rulers to do just that and are
angered when things do not go their way. People do not much like making hard decisions, but do not
like to agree with people who make them instead. The ultimate debate when taking a position of
power then becomes whether to let the people have a voice in making a government or to build one
for them to follow. The best way to govern is to make a government for your public to follow, an
authoritative government. Authoritative governments benefit people more by creating equality
among for their populations, having a faster law making processes, and establishing a better
instilment of discipline and moral consciousness.
Authoritative

The Abolishment Of The Government : What Is Our Government?
What is government? What is our government? Our government the united states is a nation state
with a federal system in place. The government is a group of people who control the state and the
state is a collection of various institutions. Theres also liberalism which is belief in representation
that someone represents the will and or inherit the wants and the needs of society this garteners the
illusion that the world can only be this way only and prevents the people from coming together on
their own. The government doesn't serve the interest of the people but the those in power like
corporations people who own or control means of life whenever the people want something for
example some sort of change or reform the police and the military is always there to stop them
prevent the voice of the people from being heard robbing them of their power. I wanna abolish
nation states in favor of decentralized self governed communes.
Some benefits with the abolishment of these nation states and the reform that'd come after would be
freedom, autonomy and equality.The only way to truly be free is to get rid of the state and every
other form of domination with the abolishment, hierarchy would essentially be gone and in the self
governed communes these concepts would come into fruition. Without any hierarchy no one would
be above one another promoting equality however freedom are mutually dependent on each other.
Individual freedom grows with collective freedom. Autonomy is the

Government In The Giver
Our government is a big point of conversation for many people. Discussing and criticizing how it is
run and organized but how is our government different from the government in the book The Giver.
The government in The Giver is supposed be perfect utopia but our government is supposed allow
people to make their own utopias. But which government would be better to live in. In The Giver
babies are kept in nurturing centers until they are grown enough to be put into their school system. If
the babies don't grow fast enough then they are killed. Once the babies do grow enough then they
are initiated as ones. Then in a year they become twos and so on. When they do something wrong
they are hit with a stick. This goes on and each year they earn something new. When they earn a
bicycle they use this as transportation for the rest of their lives. There are no cars. When they
become Twelve's they get their jobs chosen for them. After that they train in their selected jobs for a
little while then they take over their respected jobs. Once they get old they go to the house of old
where all the old people live. After ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
And they definitely don't kill old people just because they are old. If our government did any other
those things many people would get very upset and angry at our government for doing that which is
one of the reasons that the people in The Giver don't have feelings so they can do things like that.
Another thing that is a big difference is that the government choses jobs for all the citizens based on
what the government thinks the chosen citizen likes. I think some people would be very upset about
that in our country because one of the main things we are supposed to have is freedom, but in the
book, again they don't really have feelings so they don't care as

Texas Government
Texas is the second most populous state as well as the second largest state in the United States of
America (Brown, Langenegger, Garcia, Lewis, & Biles, 2014). With a huge number of people
currently calling Texas their home, it would make sense to draw the conclusion that the Texas
government must make this state a great place to live by serving its citizens to the best of its
abilities. However, it is best not to make assumptions and in order to ascertain whether the local
government actually fulfills this role we must look at multiple aspects of the government. To assess
how well the government of Texas meets the needs of its citizens we first must look at the document
that delegates power to the state government and outlines the rules ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
This is an area where public opinion and public policy match in that they both heavily favor
regressive taxation (Brown et al., 2014). Tausanovitch and Warshaw (2013) have developed a means
of understanding political preference in comparison with public opinion and public policy to
determine whether a government is best serving the desires of its people. This type of tool would be
very useful for the state of Texas to use to determine whether the government is serving the desires
of its constituents. But, just because public opinion and public policy line up doesn't mean that the
interests of citizens are best served because some groups may still be left out and those groups may
have more needs than others. Texas' current operational stance of "pay–as–you–go" makes for a very
tight budget where the government cannot always afford to spend money on things the citizens of
Texas may need. For instance, Texas operates its roads with the same "pay–as–you–go" mentality by
opting for toll roads (Brown et al., 2014). Toll roads receive some government funding through state
issued bonds and the collection of tolls after completion. This system is hardly fair for the citizens
who do not use the toll roads but still must subsidize them through taxpayer dollars when the toll
revenue does not meet the projected earnings. There are also many more citizens in Texas who live
below the poverty line, 18.4% for Texas in comparison to 15.1% for the entire United States (Brown
et al., 2014). With a larger proportion of citizens in poverty the burden to the state becomes greater,
especially when funding remains low (Insert citation). Texas is just hurting its citizens by not being
able to provide as much support and assistance to them as possible. Texas was given the opportunity,
along with every other state in the union, to expand its offering of Medicaid under the Affordable
Care Act. A sample of public opinion was obtained

The Purpose Of Government
What is the Purpose of Government?
Government, the thing that makes our lives function everyday has countless roles they play in
running a country. Some of these roles consist of listening to the citizens, providing safety and
controlling the money aspect of the country. The purpose of government is to provide safety, control
the money of the country and listen to the citizens because throughout history it has been proven
that they have been the most crucial and effective parts of a government.
Throughout history the way of government has been perceived very differently, from John Locke to
Adolf Hitler everyone has their own opinion of how government should work. John Locke said that
government needs to provide services and offer protections which has been known as the social
contract. (Why Government 1). Another philosopher, Thomas Hobbes also stated that he thought
that one of the government's main purposes was to provide protection for the citizens' rights. (Why
Government 2). Adolf Hitler's idea of government on the other hand was way more diverse than any
other philosopher. His idea was to eliminate all Jews and communists from his country (Germany),
then build up a military to try and restore Germany which required him to basically turn Germany
into a dictatorship. (Nazi Germany).
From having a Military to having laws, one of the government's main purposes is to protect and
ultimately keep the country safe. One way the

Compare And Contrast The Government Of The People And...
The people of America and their government each owe their commitment to obey certain obligations
to each other. Since each component of the nation must work together in order for it to function
properly, the people and those governing them each have essential duties they must obey to sustain
an efficiently operating country. The "government of the people, by the people, for the people."
(Lincoln) both serves the people and is served by the people.
The government is responsible for serving and representing its people. Because the people of today
generally understand that no human being is born superior or inferior to any other, the government
must promote equal opportunity and rights for all. It is commonly agreed that "all men and women

Government Corporations: Agency Of The Federal Government
Government Corporations
A government corporation is an agency of the federal government, established by Congress to
perform a public purpose, which provides a market–oriented product or service and is intended to
produce revenue that meets or approximates its expenditures. Government corporations receive most
of, but not all of, their funds from the users. (cite) They are also exempt from many budgetary
regulations so consumers of the products the corporation provides, rather than taxpayers become the
main source of income.(cite)
Amtrak was created by Congress in 1970 to take over the passenger rail services previously required
to be operated by private railroad companies in the United States and is a prime example of a
government corporation.

Government systems
An authoritarian Monarchy is a form of government in which the leader has absolute power. Under
Sui Huangdi China had an authoritative monarchy. He was hated by scholars for his book burning
and by peasants because he forced them to work on the Great Wall of China (Beck, pg. 109). He also
set standards on weights, currency, writing, and law (Beck, pg. 109). He also built roads, and started
irrigation projects (Beck, pg. 109). An advantage of his government is that he got things done to
help the country economically.
A benevolent monarchy/tyrant is a government where the leader has absolute power. Persia had a
benevolent monarchy under Cyrus the great. When he conquered a place he treated the people living
there with kindness (Beck, pg. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
157). They had 1 year terms and could only be elected once every ten years (Beck, pg. 157). Also
one consul could veto the others decisions (Beck, pg. 157). The senate was composed of 300
patrician members (Beck, pg. 157). The senate had influence over domestic and foreign policies
(Beck, pg. 157). The Tribal assembly organized by the plebeians elected the tribunes and made laws
for common people (Beck, pg. 157). In times of crisis a dictator would be elected and he had
absolute power over laws and the army (Beck, pg. 157). Their rule lasted only six months (Beck, pg.
157). Dictators where chosen by the consuls and elected by the senate (Beck, pg. 157). An
advantage of an authoritarian monarchy is that it unified china. A disadvantage is that it took away
the people?s freedom. An advantage of a benevolent monarchy/tyrant is that the people would not
rebel because they were treated fairly. An advantage of theocracy in Israel was that people did not
commit crimes a lot because doing so would violate their religion. One of the problems with this
government is that the leader could have too much power. That could lead to revolts like it did with
King Solomon. An advantage of a confederacy was that it allowed small city–states to defend
themselves against big empires. A disadvantage is that one state may gain too much power. (Athens)
Sparta?s mob rule was disadvantageous because the majority of the people could be

Government In 1984
Different governments throughout the world can seem scary, depending upon the person who views
it. Some have an elected president, while others have kings and queens who acquire the position
their parents once had. The less control of people of the country have, the more terrifying it may
appear. In the novel 1984, the people of Oceania have barely any freedom and they do not get to
elect the people above them. This may seem like the extreme opposite of America's government
today, but a lot of Americans do not realize and closely related these two governments actually are.
In a lot of ways, the people and the government of the country Oceania, in 1984, is very similar to
the people and government of our country, the United States of America.
The people in 1984 ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This is loosely related to the government in 1984 because they have one person in charge of their
country, Big Brother. The president of America is elected by the citizens in the country and do not
have complete power over everything. Everything still has to get passed by Congress. In the novel,
Big Brother is in control of everything and everyone in Oceania. He was not elected to be in charge
and does not serve terms. The biggest difference between America's government and the
government in 1984 is that Big Brother is never seen in person by anyone ever. The president of the
United States always someone who is shown publicly and is never hidden away from the country.
Ross Gianfortune stated, "A lot of attention on social media was paid to Michelle Obama's reactions
to the events at the inauguration" (Gianfortune). From this quote we learn that social media
publicizes the inauguration of a president. This makes him a known part of the country and he is
easy to find out about. He is not hidden away like Big Brother is. Other than that, they are still alike
because they are in control of the

Government In 1984
The novel 1984 is a political story with the purpose to warn the readers about the dangers of a
totalitarian government. It really shows everyone that if there is a bad appearance, it will lead us to
poor language. Then, when inadequate language comes, we think faulty thoughts. In the novel 1984
by George Orwell, there is no expression of freedom. The government in 1984 has control over
people by controlling the information. People have no access or memory of history from the past,
which allows the Party to control their understanding about the past which would influence their
thoughts in the present and the future.
This problem has to do with the fact that the government (The Inner Party) controls every source of
information. The Party can

Government Control
The current state and future of our planet is a widely discussed topic with numerous viewpoints,
possibilities, and problems that have been discussed. Often times, these hypothesized futures are
discussed with analogies in an attempt to warn against the outcome of a certain event or certain
ideals. Famously, this has been done in Brave New World by Aldous Huxley as well as 1984 by
George Orwell. While both books independently explore differing alternate realities, they have one
common theme among them, government control. Both novels differ from one another wildly, yet
have that singular theme in common, and end in the same way, with the government winning in the
end. Clearly, both authors intended their books to act as warnings against this outcome, and, as such,
are effective in doing so. For ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This is perhaps due to the fact that World War II had ended only a couple of years prior. No matter
the influence, it too contains an all–powerful government in which the populous has no control over
anything, but using a very different method. Rather than chemically induced happiness, it uses fear
and supervision as primary means of control. It implements things like telescreens and thought
crime to observe people in an attempt to catch anyone who may attempt to overthrow what they
have built. In addition to this, they destroy all traces of the past to keep people from learning. If you
control the way the past is perceived, you control the way people think, and, as such, the people
themselves. The government lies to people constantly to get them to keep following along with what
the government wants them to believe. In fact, they even went so far as to alter the language people
speak to eliminate the possibility of people even being able to conceive of rebellion. The
government looms over everything that happens, and nothing happens without them knowing. This
is a severe form of government

Democracy and Government
Democracy is defined as "the belief in freedom and equality between people, or a system of
government based on this belief, in which power is either held by elected representatives or directly
by the people themselves." So by the very definition, these governments are enlisted to advocate for
the interest of its citizens regardless of gender, race or age. All democracies are government by a
specific document which outline the method in which they are run and what rights they protect. A
common facet in all these documents is a clause that states that the government runs solely on the
will of the people, wand when will differs, the majority will prevail. However the purpose of
democracy is that it allows the ideals of minorities to be expressed. This balanced system allows for
all to have a voice. Unfortunately many times Lobbyists and political parties can generalize the will
of the people, serving industries more than citizens. However this is often checked up on, and with
recent emergence of third parties, the voice of people can be heard.
Democracies are set to address the issues which adolescents believe are important, and many have
infrastructure to deal with adolescent issues. One of the popular examples of this is the United
States' 'We the People' online petitions, an interactive way that allows the White House keep a pulse
on important issues. Any petition that is signed by more than one hundred thousand people, will be
officially and publicly addressed by the

Government Listening
In an ideal world, your governments driving purpose would be to serve and protect its populace and
would do so flawlessly and efficiently. In this ideal system, I do believe that if this government were
listening to the personal telephone calls of its residents it would be able to better protect its people
from threats that would have otherwise gone unnoticed. Dreadfully, this is not the case and never
will be the case, as human nature is not that pure. There is a plethora of other factors that become
problematic and cloud the perspective of government officials, preventing them from doing whats
right. Because of this, I realistic circumstances, I believe that government listening in on our phone
calls should be prohibited. There are a near ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
(cosmopolitan.com). Not only that, but the officer over reacted when she attempted to start her car to
roll down the windows by telling her not to move her can and then attempting to break her windows.
Granted my interpretation of this is up to debate but I firmly believe this problem stems from an
increasing number police officers who allow the power of their position to get into their head and
think that they are above the law, and I do think this relates back to the initial question because if a
police officer will let the relatively small amount of power he has go to his head, You can only
imagine how it effects politicians. This isn't the only instance of this either, as a while back, some of
the most popular online games were plagued by a spree of false FBI tips in which someone would
report a player who streams these games (or sometimes simply a player whose address they had
access to) and the FBI would raid the house as if the innocent gamer was a criminal.
Theguardian.com reports on one of these instances, where an air force veteran got raided by a swat
team during his stream. The article

A Report On A Government
A government should always be open to criticism, be held accountable for their actions, and be
honest when notifying the public of any events. This creates government transparency and allows its
citizens to hold their leaders accountable for their actions. In order to create this transparency in
today's society, a technical system must be set in place. This technical system needs to contain
government documents which are easily accessible to the public. But, not all documents should be
housed in this accessible database. Some government knowledge should be kept secret and
inaccessible, because it could fall into the wrong hands. Documents containing economic
information, such as budgets and spending should be readily available on a database for the public
to access. Without a transparent government, citizens can become unruly and no longer trust their
government due to the high volume of secrets or hidden documentation.
Solution I My first solution to this issue is to open a cloud database which would house any
documents containing government budgets, spending, and/or salaries. This database would be
accessible to everyone with the means to access a cloud database. The database could be accessed
via an application downloaded onto a computer or mobile phone. There is already an app with these
specifications available for Montgomery County in Maryland. The app was built by Socrata, a
Seattle–based cloud software company, in order to encourage citizen engagement within their

Comparing Colonial Government And Government Today
There are many similarities and differences between the colonial government and government today.
When comparing them, you will find that not a lot has changed. From then to now, there has been
advances and new ideas. Despite the changes or advances, certain things never advanced or got
changed , some ideas were left behind. What has not changed? What has changed and what makes
them different rather than similar? What was colonial government even like? The colonial
government had governors. Governors had the final decision and could persuade assemblies to do
what they wanted by disobeying a not paying their salaries. Colonial Governors had an advisory
council, colonial assemblies, colonial courts, and town meetings. The advisory council would get
together with Virginia Assembly (or VA) to create or select VA's houses. One house was called
Council of State and the other, House of Burgesses. This was a bicameral legislature which was the
lawmaking group or body with two houses. Colonial assemblies would do the same. The lower
house in bicameral legislature could raise taxes. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
What is it like? Government today is a lot like England's Parliament. A Parliament is the England's
legislature. There are two houses in government today called the House of Representatives and the
Senate. The American "Parliament" is called Congress. Congress is the lawmaking body just like the
Parliament is. Congress has the authority to create a law from a bill. Members can discuss problems
and/or solutions that may help society. If they form a bill to attempt to find a solution, they can
present it to all of the Congress members in efforts to make it a law. If they don't approve, the law
can die. Once a bill dies, members can rewrite the bill until Congress approves. If and when
Congress approves, it then has to complete the final steps to become an official law.These final steps
may include, getting ratified and getting

The Importance Of The Government
Throughout history, government has been criticized and called out for it's inability to do it's job of
protecting its people properly. People see the government as power hungry, cold, and corrupt. This is
evident throughout time when the people are discontent with their government. Henry David
Thoreau once said, "That government is best which governs least." Henry David Thoreau lived two
hundred years ago, but his statement is still relevant today. I neither disagree or agree with his
statement. Both forms of government has it's flaws and benefits and I feel it's dangerous to only
agree with one side. The government should not be intertwined with the lives of the citizens but the
government should not have a hands off approach either. I believe the government should be a
balance of the hands off approach and the government that utilizes it's power. I believe that a
government that does not use it's power is wrong because it would slow down humanity and leave
the country's citizens vulnerable. Without a strong government, advances in science and medicine
would slow down completely (Figurative language, hyperbole). NASA would cease to exist and
many government backed science programs would be lost. This would mean a considerable loss in
human advancement. A government where it uses it's power can be strong because it unites many to
solve one problem. A government has the power to make changes that a private company may not
have the funds or authority to do. Another reason

The Impact Of Local Government On Local Government
Local government is an administrative body for a small area such as a city,town county or state.The
local government will typically only have control over their specific area.
The main aim of local government is to provide a system under which councils perform the
functions and exercise the powers conferred by or under this Act and any other Act for the peace,
order and good government of their municipal districts.
The impacts of this on HG Walter will be that employees will have to pay to park.
This will impact HG Walter in a bad way this is because the staff will have to pay to park. Which
would affect them because their employees may not want to work in a place where there will have
pay to park.
By the government implementing that HG Walters have to have parking meters will impact the
public in managing their parking times.
Regional government is a government entity that only has control on their specific small area.
National government is the government or political authority that controls a nation.
The main aim of the national government is to have a stable security they also aim to enforce laws
for the nation.
European government makes laws that affect all the countries in the EU.The EU government are
concerned about the environmental issues as well as other areas.
The main aim of the European government is to establish European citizenship they also aim to
ensure the free movement of people , goods and services.
The impacts of this on HG Walter will be that

Spartan Government Vs Athenian Government
Spartan's government was far superior to the government of Athens. Sparta had elements of an
oligarchy. The two kings were part of the government for tradition were the Council of Elders, or
Gerousia, a group of twenty–eight Spartiate men and the two kings that who create bills, that the
Assembly, or common man, vote on. . There were extensive checks and balances to make sure that
no part, or branch, became too powerful. The Assembly was composed of every adult male in
Sparta, but theoretically anybody could participate. They voted whether to pass bills into law, and
against common belief, they could vote more than yes or no. These members of the Assembly were
chosen, by the impartial evaluators, who sat in a different room and listened for the loudest cheer for
each ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
One of Sparta's main achievements was the equal distribution of land. All citizens had a roughly
equal portion of land to the next1. Women actually were more wealthy than men. They could inherit
and own land, combined with their naturally longer lifespan, gave them time for wealth to
accumulate (113). In contrast, Athenian government was not as balanced or equal. In the Athenian
democracy, every citizen was required to participate or suffer punishment. This practice stands in
stark contrast to modern democratic governments in which citizens can choose whether or not they
wish to participate. In Athenian democracy, all citizens pulled their weight. Not everyone in Athens
was considered a citizen. Only free, adult men enjoyed the rights and responsibility of citizenship.
Only about 20 percent of the population of Athens were citizens. Women were not citizens and
therefore could not vote or have any say in the political process. They were rarely permitted out in
public and were even restricted as to where they could be within their own homes. Slaves and
foreigners were not citizens and also could not participate in the

The Role Of Government In An Autocratic Government
In an autocracy government, power is ruled by one person and the leader has an absolute authority
over politics and business sectors. If businessmen invest their money in any business, the head of the
government must be satisfied, who is the autocratic leader, otherwise it would be no way to survive.
Unfortunately, today some parts of the world still struggling having autocratic leaders and their
people are in turmoil in terms of investing because there is not a stable government. However, some
argue that autocratic governments are stable environments for business because since one person has
the control and the leader might not get involved for levying mass taxes on businesses or
monopolizing business sector. On the contrary, business has grown up in democratic nations for the
last decades since, businessmen are stable in democratic nations. In this essay, I talk about different
points of views of scholarly writers whom they believe which government system is a better
environment for business. Facts and analysis will determine the betterment of business in democracy
or autocratic?
Review
Since three and half decades, the democratic nations are moving forward in terms of business
environment, and autocratic nations are declining, that is based on Center for System Peace a non–
profit organization which surveys wars and business around the globe. This indicates that uprising
which had happened in some parts of the world, especially countries who were under Soviet Union

Branches Of Government
The government has many purposes,the sole purpose being to regulate the economy and provide a
stable foundation for the country.Also the purposes is to serve and protect the people it governs
without infringing on individuals God give rights.Absolute is all about a type of national monarchy
in which the monarch has a great power and it refer to philosophical stances which promote notions
of absolute truth,involving contentions that in particular realms of thought.The enlightenment period
took place in 18th century basically people started thinking out side the rights also right to rebel.The
hook is about government and enlightenment. The enlightenment philosophers is john Locke and
Thomas Hobbes and the absolute king is monarch they believe in christian God they go to church to
worship God they believe that God came to die because of us and clear our sin away also God is the
only one who can save you and protect you ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
i Will have a dictator and exercising absolute power and control in a government cause i need to
make sure the country too is moving forward to the next level also bring peace in the country and
protected the people also use the tax money to hire security so that they can protect the country
cause if there is no security people will be doing bad things and doing what ever they wont also
bullying others and will be killing so the security will take control so that it will bring peace in the

Government Differences In The Government Of Rome And Rome
Rome had a government that was often in flux, as different challenges were faced throughout the
reign of their empire. Carthage too had many ways that the government was organized and built
upon. Rome and Carthage, however, had vast differences in their style of governance as well. In the
following short paragraphs, Rome and Carthage's government differences will be discussed. First,
the Roman government shared some similarities to the Carthaginian government, however, there
were also many differences. The Roman government, on a very basic level was different then the
Carthaginian government. The Romans had a temporary dictator that could be called on if needed
when there was a crisis in terms of warfare. This dictator could only be ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The voting system was along tribal lines. There were also tribal assemblies that decided on localized
matters within the tribe. These had both rich and poor in them. In this way, although not quite a
democracy, more citizens were being heard than in other countries or cities (Wasson 2017, Para. 10–
12). This was how the Roman government was set up. Second, the Carthaginian government had
some different practices from the Roman government. One of these practices was that they did not
have a temporary dictator like Rome had. Also, the Senate in Carthage does seem to have had
legislative power. They also had to agree with their two magistrates running the country about a
certain decision or they had to pass the vote on to the popular assembly. Many of the responsibilities
of the Senate also focused heavily on war (Cartwright, 2016, Para. 2–4). There were also special
Senate members who were the magistrates or the ones making and analyzing the laws. Almost all
positions were only available in terms of ruling for a short time. This was an attempt to curb
corruption, although, it did not help as much as had been hoped (Cartwright, 2016, Para. 5–7). In
terms of the Assembly, all that is known about it is that people had to be citizens and male to join,
and their main responsibilities were to vote on laws among other items that were passed down to
them from the senate and the magistrates. They also helped elect some of the positions in the
government. Carthage

Government Surveillance
Reflecting on the current state of privacy, it's an accurate assertion to say that most nations no longer
have absolute anonymity from the government. If something is done in public, it can always be
traced back to an individual. Of course, the domain of public is no longer limited the mall or the bar,
but rather simply online on one's device, through the Internet. And throughout recent history,
consumers have traded their anonymity for benefits that services like Google offer. In the status quo,
privacy is growing more remote day by day, and there is no established baseline to limit the extent
of information the government can collect on an individual. Since there are also conflicting
viewpoints on government surveillance, it's important that ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
In the aftermath of 9/11, the government came to the conclusion that their security efforts had not
kept pace with technology. Consequently, they created what was formerly known as the Terrorist
Surveillance Program. Government officials even made a confident assertion that if the program had
been in effect before 9/11, the hijackers could have been identified and the attacks thwarted (CBS
News). Out of fear and hysteria, the public demanded more security and in turn, the government
brought forth an era of mass surveillance. But has it stacked up to its expectations? Till this day,
research shows that no potent acts of terrorism have been prevented by the program (Elliott).
Instead, the program had given birth to the most hawkish ethnic profiling campaign since the second
world war, similar to the Thought Police in 1984 which Winston describes as follows, "how often, or
on what system, the Thought Police plugged in on any individual wire was guesswork. It was even
conceivable that they watched everybody all the time. But at any rate, they could plug in your wire
whenever they wanted to. You had to live–did live, from habit that became instinct–in the
assumption that every sound you made was overheard, and, except in darkness, every movement
scrutinized" (Orwell 5). In addition to this, he brings up mass surveillance into focus as well, which
has, in reality, been unsuccessful thus far identifying criminals (Elliott). To make this simpler,
consider this common analogy to finding a needle in a haystack. The needle in this scenario is any
potential threat, and the haystack is the entire population. It's a logically supported inference that
one will be able to find the needle quicker and more easily if the haystack were smaller. But with
mass surveillance, more and more people

Elitism In Government
The ability to compel another person to comply with one's intentions is known as power. Authority
is a form of power that takes its force from legitimacy, political authority that is assigned by the law
or the state through legal documents. The government is an institution that is based upon authority.
There are various ways in which authority can be conferred upon a governmental institution and
many opinions on how it should be used. Thomas Jefferson states that a good government should be
considerate of the people's needs, and should concern itself with protecting its citizens without
interfering with citizens' personal affairs. According to this interpretation, the government must be
restricted in its authority, should act in the interests ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In a government such as Jefferson describes, majoritarian politics is most fitting. Majoritarian
politics generally occurs when the government considers issues important to the people. The people
have more power because pressure from the majority opinion is exerted on the leader. Meanwhile,
elitism occurs when public opinion is largely absent, giving leaders greater freedom to act in self–
interest. There are several theories of elitism: Marxism, which describes power as being in the hands
of business leaders, a view exemplified by the influence held by American capitalists; the power
elite theory, in which key leaders in society control and are served by the government, can be seen in
the influence held by the media and wealthy members of society; the bureaucratic view, which holds
the official as the vessel of power and hand behind administrative action, and may be exemplified by
members of Congress, who deliberate amongst themselves on matters that may concern the public;
and the pluralist view, which describes various powerful groups in government and politics as
cooperating with each other while being aware of the public opinion in order to maintain popularity.
This is observed in the cooperation between various branches of government and powerful
organizations. Elitism allows for more self–interest. Although a self–interested government does not
necessarily dictate that policies will be unbeneficial for the people, it is on the whole detrimental
and less restricted than the ideal Jefferson held for government. A majoritarian government is best
suited to Jefferson's idea of

Government Vs Government Essay
How does learning about government and our America help you become a future guardian of the
liberties of our country. In our world we talk about our government and America being better. Yet,
there is more to it than just the government itself. We as citizens hold up the responsibility of being
the guardians of our country's liberties. It's not about just being a citizen alone but, being able to
realize the opportunities that we have in laws themselves. Court of law, immigrants earning their
citizenship, and our military system are all topics that will be covered in this essay. First, we have
our court of law. This is meaning that you have many rights in the court room itself such as, the right
to remain silent. In our case we the people are given these right to give us our chances to prove
ourselves innocent. If we choose we can have a lawyer given to us to help. In a court room it's also
know to be open–minded to show that the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
So many kids now look up to the people that run our country and want to become war heroes. What
I understand about this is that people think it's a masculine thing to join the military but, the way I
see it as men can do what women can and vice versa. Women are usually seen in the medical portion
of the military because we have that motherly instinct that men don't have. There has been a lot of
controversy about this but women are equally as strong men and I'm going to prove that as being a
future guardian in protecting our liberties. In conclusion, each and everyone of us have the rights of
everybody else. We just need to realize that even though it may seem unfair in cases, we are the
future of America. We will determine the faith and with this we need to protect what is right. Our
liberties are the most important part that. Being in the court of law, being an immigrant earning their
citizenship, or even being apart of our military systems. You are protecting our liberties, as a United
States

Government Drones
"The thought of government drones buzzing overhead and constantly monitoring the activities of
law –abiding citizens runs contrary to the notion of what it means to live in a free society" says
senator Charles Grassley on a topic that is in very high controversy (Quattlebaum1).Having the
sanctity of our own privacy in households and backyards is an entitlement that we all are gifted
with, but many people are having that privacy tarnished with a new creation sweeping the country–
Drones. Domestic use of drones is raising concerns about privacy and fourth amendment violations
in many states and cities. Privacy is only one of the concerns of these drones.Many drones are found
crashing into buildings and trees and are considered a huge safety hazard ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
In fact it was a drone, hired by a real estate agent to take photos of the property next door to her
house . Lingard was later horrified to discover a picture the drone had taken showing her mostly
naked body in billboard real estate ads"(Smith16). Many people are wondering if overhead drones
controlled by a police officer or even a neighbor violates privacy and especially our Fourth
Amendment right of unreasonable searches and seizures. Jay Stanley of the A.C.L.U has found his
place on these battery powered invaders when he states "We don't want the government hovering
over our cities and towns 24/7 and tracking everywhere that everyone goes"(17). Stanley is
definitely not the only concerned citizen on the issue.The drones can be the size of birds to nearly
three ton monsters. Senator Patrick Leahy of Vermont makes the same point when he states "This
fast emerging technology is cheap and could pose a threat to the privacy and civil liberties of
millions of Americans...it is another example of a fast–changing policy area on which we need to
focus to make sure that modern technology is not used to erode Americans rights to

Government Vs Government
The Need for Government In Lord of the Flies, William Golding demonstrates the deterioration of
society in an island where there is no functioning government. The boys at the secluded island
slowly becoming savages due to the lack of laws and regulations to guide their actions. Even though
some people may argue that a government limits freedom within a society, it guarantees the safety of
citizens in exchange for the limited freedom. First of all, a government protects the rights of the
people. Secondly, it establishes consequences for crimes and misdeeds, and lastly, government
maintains peace and order within a society. Therefore, a strong, functioning government is necessary
for the survival of society. Firstly, a strong government ensures ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Firstly, it protects the rights of humans; secondly, it provides consequences for the malicious actions
of citizens, and finally, it is mandatory for the preservation of order and peace in society. Lord of the
Flies presents an accurate representation of what would happen without an active government in
society; people would not consider the community as a whole and humans would slowly become
savages. Without a systematic way to regulate the actions of citizens, humans would be living in a
dystopia where the behavior of the individuals would lead to the deterioration of society while also
eliminating peace, justice, harmony, and

Greek Government Vs Athenian Government
Ancient Government "Government should be by those people with enough time on their hands to
pursue virtue." Aristotle, one of the greatest philosophers of all time, spoke these words.
Researchers believe that the Athenian Constitution is supposedly a copy of Aristotle's book, Politics,
which was made for research for his students. Aristotle defines the constitution as "a certain
ordering of the inhabitants of the city–state."(1) The ancient Athenian government was a democracy.
Ancient Rome on the other hand, had a "mixed constitution" (2). Polybius writes the analysis of
Constitution of the Roman Republic where he outlines the distinct branches of the Roman
government and he explains why it worked. Rome was the most successful society prior to 300
BCE, because of the improvements they made in government, engineering, and the army, which still
affects society today. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It was developed in the city–state of Athens and included the nearby city–state of Attica, in 508
BCE. Athens had the most powerful democracy around at that time. Several other city–states
followed the same type of democracy because of the way it worked. The Athenian democracy had
three branches of government: the Ekklesia, the Boule, and the Dikasteria. It is truly amazing how
the Athenian democracy achieved the concept of equal rights and created a system where no person
or group can be more powerful than the other. The Athenian constitution is an interpretation on the
development of constitutional in ancient Greece. The text of the constitution is written history of
from a political standpoint. It outlines the progression of Greek rulers, and their rights and
privileges. The constitution traces rulers along with their constitutional reforms all the way back to
403 BCE. Aristotle touches on topics of earlier Greek history where democracy first started.
Depicting from Aristotle's analysis, Solon was the creator of the Greek

The American Government
All individuals within the United States do not receive the proper benefits they desire which results
on the Government not fully benefiting their needs. The American government supports all citizens,
but does not grant individuals their total human rights that they fully deserve. Individuals have the
right to be supported by the government especially the one with a low income,troubled families, and
struggling individuals. Although the government satisfies the needs of its people to certain extent, it
only occurs when the government is involved due to self–interest. The legislative process, interest
groups, and congressional powers tend to stop the American individuals from being fully satisfied
by the government of the United States. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Gridlocks stop copious bills from being passed, this results and leads to benefit the political system.
There are various bills that are constantly being introduced to the legislative system but most of
them do not proceed to get passed. Copious bills are being introduced each year but unfortunately
due to gridlocks only about 4–5% of bills get passed due to the high amount of gridlocks occurring
within the government. The copious bills that are not being pass could have been utilized to help
individuals in order to grant their desires. Instead of being passed they are just stuck waiting for the
ratification that would unfortunately take various of years. Although there are laws that are
constantly being published, there are also copious bills that stay behind waiting for their approval
because they are stuck within gridlocks. If gridlocks did not occur so frequently many bills would
have the ability to get passed rapidly, which could be utilized to grant more right to the American
citizens.
Furthermore, one highly important part of the government is represented within the congressional
powers. Congressional powers portrays the ability to lay and collect taxes, provide for the common
defenses and general welfare, and most importantly its ability to

Cons Of Government
First to start off, what is government? Don't worry I will explain it all to you. There are three
definitions. The first definition is: A group of people who control and makes decisions for a country,
state, etc. The second definition is: A particular system used for controlling a country, state, etc. The
last definition is: the process or manner of controlling a country, state, etc. Basically a government is
a system or institutions in an operation, the group of people in charge, or the process in use, is the
authority that sets rules for a society or helps people relate to one another.
http://study.com/academy/lesson/what–is–government–definition–role–functions.html
So what is the purpose and role of our national government? Basically, ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Basically, people don't think that the government does not know how the people work at all. Or even
them. People want the government to think about them too. https://www.quora.com/what–are–the–
pros–and–cons–of–the–US–system–of–government
The last con is that the government is almost close to not being able to respond to horrible crises or
event important or dangerous events. This makes things even worse. What if someone starts
communism again? What if Germany wants to attack or start a war again? No good at all. People
can perish. The U.S is most likely able to collapse just because of this.
https://www.quora.com/what–are–the–pros–and–cons–of–the–US–system–of–government
Many people say these good's and bad's about government. Just to be honest I don't know which
side to choose. Statistics say that even cops are dangerous also. They attack mostly blacks which
isn't even fair. People think that the government might turn into a dictatorship. I bet no one wants
that. No one wants to be back in slavery. I sure don't want to be a slave. Everyone wants to be a free
citizen. I believe that the government is doing whatever they can to keep us safe. But they are
definitely slowing down. It's like they are forgetting us. But we have to stand up for

American Government Vs Us Government
When we think about our government we think that it is fair and that since we get to choose who we
want to represent us, our government is of the people, by the people, for the people. Some of us are
too ignorant, like me, to see that the very way that our government is set up benefits those who are
the wealthiest. Instead the American government is of the wealthy, by the wealthy and for the
wealthy. I think that our government does benefit wealthy people and other powerful organizations.
The reason that I say this is because there are so many policies and things in our government that
mostly benefits those who are the top 1%. Lobbyist mostly stays in the legislative branch but the
branches of our government can lobby each other as a way the ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Voters do not know whether or not the candidates are qualified. How can we chose who we want as
our judges if we don't even know how to decide on who to pick? And finally money has further
corrupted the process. Can you imagine a lawyer or a litigant walking up to a judge in the middle of
a trial and handing the judge a check for his or her campaign? Would it make any difference if the
check was delivered a week before? And isn't it even worse now that the big boys are coming in
with even bigger checks? One report says, and the money involved has created "a grave and
growing challenge to the impartiality of our nation's courts. "Another reason why the judicial branch
benefits those in power is because in many cases were the lawyers and the judges are corrupt. One
example would be when a District Attorney and other officials help a convicted criminal escape.
Why would they do such a thing? It is because money is involved and they pay each other off and
they lie and commit

Government Censorship
Should governments be allowed to censor information?
Censorship has always been a controversial topic. People will always want to know the truth. The
more democratic a nation is the more information is available. In these cases governments will
usually try to moderate what information is being circulated. By definition censorship is legally
defined in Australia as "the official inspection of books, journals, theatre, film, music and popular
media of many forms before release (prepublication) to ensure that they do not offend against legal
proscriptions instituted by governments" (Moore, 2013). In this essay censorship will take a broader
term in which it will also encompass instances of when governments try to provide incentives of
getting rid of information, omitting or restricting access to it through other means. Many people
experience censorship whether they know it or not and it is always debated if governments should
be able to censor information. There are a lot of cases where censorship should be allowed and cases
where it should not be. This essay will highlight instances and circumstances of when a government
should be able to censor information.
Censorship should be allowed in cases that involve instances where it is to protect the public or the
nation. Information that harms the security of a country should be protected and not made available
to the public. Under this circumstance though the government should be ethical about the
information they censor and the

The Purpose Of Government
What is the purpose of government?
Government is theoretically the driving force of a community of people. The government's purpose
is to maintain order, justice and security to their citizens. The Government is responsible for creating
and enforcing laws that are for the well being of the general public.
2) What would your ideal government look like (structure), and what would it do?
My ideal government would be both efficient and fair to it's people. Structurally, I would choose to
remain a democracy. In order to prevent extortion, elections would be held in blind fashion.
Neglecting to reveal the person's identity would allow one's thoughts and propositions to take the
forefront of the campaign's basis rather than one's physical

Government Roles In Government

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Jennifer Baker

More from Jennifer Baker (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Government Roles In Government