SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 11
101Tips-Automation.book Page 231 Sunday, September 9, 2012 11:04 PM




         Appendix F: First Principle Process
         Gains, Deadtimes, and Time
         Constants


         There are three types of processes; self-regulating, integrating, and runaway as shown in
         Figures F-1, F-2, and F-3, respectively. A self-regulating process will decelerate to a new
         steady state. An integrating process will continually ramp. A runaway process will accel-
         erate until hitting a relief or interlock setting.

         Over 90% of the processes are self-regulating. However, many of the continuous and fed-
         batch processes in the chemical industry with the greatest direct economic benefits behave
         and can be best treated as “near integrating” processes. The classic integrating process is a
         pure batch or level process. Less than 1% of the processes are runaway. When these exist,
         understanding the runaway response is critical in terms of safety and control because of
         the propensity to accelerate and reach a point of no return. Runaway responses are almost
         exclusively associated with highly exothermic reactors used in plastics and specialty
         chemical production.

         This note develops the equations for process dynamics for back mixed volumes and plug
         flow volumes. The back mixed volumes section applies to volumes whenever an agitator
         pumping rate, an eductor or recirculation liquid flow rate, or gas evolution or sparge rate
         produces enough turbulence and back mixing to make the mixture more uniform in the
         axial besides the radial direction of the volume. Gas volumes generally have enough tur-
         bulence and a fast enough gas dispersion rates to be treated as a back mixed volume. The
         equations therefore hold relatively well for an evaporator and a single distillation stage
         due to turbulence from the vapor flow. The plug volume section applies to static mixers,
         pipelines, coil inlets, and jacket inlets where the turbulence from pipe fittings or internal
         mixing elements creates enough radial mixing to make the mixture uniform over the
         cross-section of the pipe or nozzle inlet but little axial mixing.

         Back Mixed Volumes

         For a back mixed volume, the process gains and time constants can be readily identified if
         the ordinary differential equations for the rate of accumulation of energy or material in the
         volume are set up so that the process output of interest (Y) is on right side with a unity
         coefficient. From this simple generic form we can identify the process time constant (τp) as
         the coefficient of derivative of the process output (dY/dt) and the process gain (Kp) as the
         coefficient of the process input (X). The process output (Y) and input (X) can be viewed as
         the controlled and manipulated variables, respectively. Many other terms can exist but
         these are not shown in the following equations. These missing terms can be categorized as
         disturbances.

         If the sign of the unity coefficient of the process output on the right side is negative (Equa-
         tion F-1a), the process has negative feedback. As the process output changes, the negative


         231        101 Tips for a Successful Automation Career
101Tips-Automation.book Page 232 Sunday, September 9, 2012 11:04 PM




                       Process Output (Y)
                       & Process Input (X)
                                                                                                 New Steady State

                                                                                                              Y
                                                       Kp = ΔY / ΔX
                                                       (Self-Regulating Process Gain)



                                                                                X


                                                                                                                                           ΔY


                                                                                                                  0.63∗ΔY
                                                       ΔX



                            Noise Band




                                                                                                                                Time (t)
                                                                         θp              τp
                                                  Process                                                 Self-Regulating Process
                                                  Dead Time                                               Time Constant


                                             Figure F-1. Self-regulating (negative feedback) process




                         Process Output (Y)
                         & Process Input (X)
                                                                                                                                Y




                                                            Ki = { [ ΔY2 / Δt2 ] − [ ΔY1 / Δt1 ] } / ΔX
                                                            (Integrating Process Gain)

                                                                                X




                                                  ΔX



                            ramp rate is                                                   ramp rate is
                              ΔY1 / Δt1                                                      ΔY2 / Δt2



                                                                                                                                    Time (t)
                                                                θp

                                             Process
                                             Dead Time


                                                 Figure F-2. Integrating (zero feedback) process




                                         Appendix F: First Principle Process Gains, Deadtimes                                                   232
101Tips-Automation.book Page 233 Sunday, September 9, 2012 11:04 PM




               Process Output (Y)
               & Process Input (X)



                                                                                          Y
                                           Kp = ΔY / ΔX           Acceleration
                                           (Runaway Process Gain)



                                                              X                                                          1.72∗ΔY




                                                                                                         ΔY
                                           ΔX



                    Noise Band




                                                                                                              Time (t)
                                                         θp                         τp’
                                        Process                                               Runaway Process
                                        Dead Time                                             Time Constant


                                         Figure F-3. Runaway (positive feedback) process



         feedback slows down and eventually halts the excursion of the process output at its new
         steady state when it balances out the effect of the process input and the disturbances.

                                                 τ p ∗ dY / dt = K p ∗ X − Y                                                   (F-1a)

         The integration of this equation provides the time response of a change in the process out-
         put (ΔY) for a change in the process input (ΔX).

                                                                      −t / τ p
                                                 ΔY = K p ∗ (1 − e               ) ∗ ΔX                                        (F-1b)

         If the process output does not appear on the right side (Equation F-2a), there is no process
         feedback. As the process output changes, there is no feedback to slow it down or speed it
         up so it continues to ramp. There is no steady state. The ramping will only stop when X is
         zero or balances out the disturbances.

                                                      dY / dt = K i ∗ X                                                        (F-2a)

                                                     ΔY = K i ∗ Δt ∗ ΔX                                                        (F-2b)

         Often in the more important loops for concentration, pressure, and temperature control of
         large volumes, the time constant in Equation F-1a is so large that the time to reach steady
         state is beyond the time frame of interest. Since these loops with small deadtime to time
         constant ratios should be tuned with small Lambda factors (high controller gains) per
         Advanced Application Note 3, the controller only sees the first part of the excursion before


         233        101 Tips for a Successful Automation Career
101Tips-Automation.book Page 234 Sunday, September 9, 2012 11:04 PM




              the inflection point and deceleration by negative process feedback. In this case we have a
              “near Integrator” and Equation F-1a is best visualized as Equation F-2a with an integrator
              gain calculated per Equation F-2c.

                                                              K i = K p /τ p                           (F-2c)

              If the sign of the unity coefficient of the process output on the right side is positive (Equa-
              tion F-3a), the process has positive feedback. As the process output changes, the positive
              feedback speeds up the excursion unless disturbances counteract the effect of the process
              input and output.

                                                      τ p ∗ dY / dt = K p ∗ X + Y                     (F-3a)

                                                                        t /τ p
                                                       ΔY = K p ∗ ( e            − 1) ∗ ΔX            (F-3b)

              Consider a mixed volume with a jacket and vapor space as shown in Figure F-4. There
              are liquid reactant feeds, gas feeds (sparged through the liquid and added directly to the
              vapor space), an outlet liquid flow, a vent gas flow, and a jacket coolant flow. There is
              normally multiple components interest. For example, consider liquid or gas acid and
              base reagent or reactant components (a, b) to produce primary and secondary liquid or
              gas products (c, d, e). Consider also there are typically water and nitrogen gas compo-
              nents (w, n).

              The ordinary differential equation for the accumulation of liquid mass as shown in Equa-
              tion F-4a includes inlet flows added directly to the liquid volume (ΣFi), vapor flow rates
              from evaporation and vaporization (ΣFv), and an outlet liquid flow rate (Fo). The liquid
              level depends upon density and cross-section area of the liquid. Equation F-4a can then be
              reformulated to Equation F-4b to include the process variable of interest, liquid level (Ll),
              in the derivative.

                                                     dM o / dt =  F i −  F v − F o                  (F-4a)

                                              d ( ρ o ∗ Ao ∗ Lo ) / dt =  F i −  F v − F o          (F-4b)

              If we consider the density (ρo) to be a weak function of composition and therefore constant
              like the cross-sectional area (Ao) we can take these terms outside the derivative and divide
              through to get an equation for level (Lo) in the form of F-2a. Now it is clearly evident that
              the integrating process gain (Ki) for manipulation of flows in or flow out is simply the
              inverse of the product of the liquid density and cross-section area (Equation F-4d).

                                           dLo / dt = [1 /( ρ o ∗ Ao )]∗ [ F i −  F v − F o ]        (F-4c)

                                                           K i = 1 /( ρ o ∗ Ao )                      (F-4d)

              The ordinary differential equation for the accumulation of gas mass as shown in Equation
              F-5a includes inlet flows added directly to the gas volume (ΣFi), vapor flow rates from gas
              sparging, evolution, and vaporization (ΣFv), and an exit gas flow rate (Fg). Equations of
              state such as the ideal gas law can be used to express this relationship for a given composi-



                                       Appendix F: First Principle Process Gains, Deadtimes             234
101Tips-Automation.book Page 235 Sunday, September 9, 2012 11:04 PM




         tion. Equation F-5a can then be reformulated to Equation F-5b to include the process vari-
         able of interest, gas pressure (Pg), in the derivative.

                                                dM g / dt =  F i +  F v − F g                                       (F-5a)

                                 d [ ( P g * V g ) ⁄ ( R g * T g ) ] ⁄ dt =    Fi +  Fv – Fg                        (F-5b)


         If we consider changes in the gas volume (Vg) and gas temperature (Tg) to be much slower
         than changes in the gas pressure (Pg) and therefore relatively constant during the integra-
         tion step we can take these terms outside the derivative and divide through to get an equa-
         tion for pressure in the form of Equation F-2a. Now it is clearly evident that the integrating
         process gain (Ki) for manipulation of flows in or flow out is simply the product of the uni-
         versal gas coefficient (Rg) and the absolute gas temperature divided by the gas volume
         (Equation F-5d). This assumes a change in pressure does not significantly change the gas
         glow out of the volume, which is normally the case for a pressure drop across the vent
         valve that is large or critical.

                                  dP ⁄ dt = [ ( R * T ) ⁄ V ] * [  F +  F – F ]                                     (F-5c)
                                    g            g   g     g         i     v   g

                                                  Ki = [ ( Rg * Tg ) ⁄ Vg ]                                           (F-5d)


         The ordinary differential equation for the accumulation of energy as shown in Equation F-
         6a includes the effects of feed temperature, heat of reaction as a function of temperature,
         heat of vaporization, and heat transfer to the jacket. If we consider the specific heat capac-
         ity relatively constant and use the multiplicative rule of integration, we can express the
         differential equation in the generic form of Equation F-2a in terms of temperature to show
         the process feedback. The relative magnitude of the terms in the denominator of Equation
         F-6g determines the feedback sign.

             dQo / dt = C p ∗ ( F i ∗T i) − C p ∗ F o ∗T o + ( ΔQr / ΔT o) ∗T o − H v ∗ F v − U ∗ A ∗ (T o − T j )
                                                                                                                      (F-6a)

                   dQo / dt = d (C p ∗ M o ∗T o) / dt = C p ∗ ( d M o / dt ) ∗T o + C p ∗ M o ∗( dT o / dt )
                                                                                                                      (F-6b)

                                                           Ff = F i
                                                                                                                      (F-6c)

                                                    T f = ( F i ∗T i) /  F i
                                                                                                                      (F-6d)

                                       C p ∗ (d M o / dt ) ∗T o = C p ∗ ( F f − F o ) ∗T o
                                                                                                                      (F-6e)

                       C p *M o * ( dT o ⁄ dt ) = C p *F f *T f + H x *R x – H v *F v + U*A*T j                       (F-6f)
                                        – [ C p *F f + ΔQ r ⁄ ΔT o + U*A ]*T o




         235        101 Tips for a Successful Automation Career
101Tips-Automation.book Page 236 Sunday, September 9, 2012 11:04 PM




              For the manipulation of jacket temperature to control outlet temperature, the main process
              time constant (τp) is (positive feedback if heat of feed and reaction exceeds product of heat
              transfer coefficient and area):

                                        τ p = ( C p *M o ) ⁄ [ C p *F f + ΔQ r ⁄ ΔT o + U*A ]       (F-6g)


              For the manipulation of jacket temperature to control outlet temperature, the process gain
              (Kp) is:

                                          K p = ( U*A ) ⁄ [ C p *F f + ΔQ r ⁄ ΔT o + U*A ]          (F-6h)


              For the manipulation of jacket temperature to control outlet temperature, the near integra-
              tor gain (Ki) is:

                                                       K i = (U ∗ A ) / (C p ∗ M o )                 (F-6i)

              For the manipulation of feed temperature to control outlet temperature, the process gain
              (Kp) is:

                                         K p = ( C p *F f ) ⁄ [ C p *F f + ΔQ r ⁄ ΔT o + U*A ]       (F-6j)


              For the manipulation of feed flow to control outlet temperature, the process gain (Kp) is:

                                         K p = ( C p *T f ) ⁄ [ C p *F f + ΔQ r ⁄ ΔT o + U*A ]      (F-6k)


              For manipulation of jacket temperature, the additional small secondary process time con-
              stant associated with the heat capacity and mass of the jacket wall is:

                                                      τ p = ( C w *M w ) ⁄ [ U*A ]                   (F-6l)


              Any change in the temperature at the heat transfer surfaces or the feed inlet must be dis-
              persed and back mixed into the volume. This process deadtime ( θ p ) is the turn over time
              that can be approximated as the liquid inventory divided by the summation of the feed
              flow rate (Ff), agitator pumping rate (Fa), recirculation flow rate (Fr), and vapor evolution
              rate or vapor bubble rate (Fv). Since this turn over time is computed in terms of volumetric
              flow rates, the liquid mass and the mass flow rates are divided by their respective densi-
              ties as shown in Equation F-6m.

                                        θp = ( Mo ⁄ ρo ) ⁄ [ ( Ff + Fa + Fr ) ⁄ ρo + Fv ⁄ ρv ]      (F-6m)


              If there is an injector (dip tube or sparger ring) volume, a change in composition at the
              nozzle must propagate by plug flow to the discharge points of the dip tube or sparger ring.
              The deadtime for a feed flow (F1) is the injector volume (V1) divided by the injection mass
              flow (F1) divided by its respective density (ρ1).

                                                           θ p = V1 / ( F1 / ρ 1 )                  (F-6n)




                                       Appendix F: First Principle Process Gains, Deadtimes           236
101Tips-Automation.book Page 237 Sunday, September 9, 2012 11:04 PM




         The ordinary differential equation for the accumulation of liquid reactant mass (MA) as
         shown in Equation F-7a includes the effects of feeds (Fi) with a reactant mass fraction
         (XAi), reaction rate (Rx), and outlet flow (Fo). The feeds can be from raw material, interme-
         diate products, recycle streams, or multi-stage reactors. If we use the multiplicative rule of
         integration, we can express the differential equation in the generic form of Equation F-2a
         in terms of concentration to show the process feedback.

                                        dM A / dt = ( F i ∗ X Ai) − ( R x + F o) ∗ X Ao                   (F-7a)

                          dM A / dt = d ( M o ∗ X Ao) / dt = ( d M o / dt ) ∗ X Ao + M o ∗( dX Ao / dt )   (F-7b)

                                                           Ff = F i                                       (F-7c)

                                                  X Af = ( F i ∗ X Ai) /  F i                            (F-7d)

                                            (d M o / dt ) ∗ X Ao = ( F f − F o) ∗ X Ao                     (F-7e)

                                    M o∗ ( dX Ao / dt ) = F f ∗ X Af − ( R x + F f ) ∗ X Ao                (F-7f)

         For the manipulation of feed flow to control reactant concentration (XAo), the main process
         time constant (τp) is:

                                                    τ p = M o / (Rx + F f )                                (F-7g)

         For the manipulation of feed flow to control reactant concentration (XAo), the process gain
         (Kp) is:

                                                   K p = X Af / ( R x + F f )                              (F-7h)

         For the manipulation of feed flow to control reactant concentration, the near integrator
         gain (Ki) is:

                                                        Ki = X Af / M o                                    (F-7i)

         For the manipulation of feed concentration to control reactant concentration, the process
         gain (Kp) is:

                                                     K p = F f /( R x + F f )                              (F-7j)

         The process deadtimes from turnover time and from feed injection are the same as com-
         puted in the section for temperature control (Equations F-6m and F-6n).

         Plug Flow Volumes

         For plug flow volumes where different streams are being combined, the process gain for
         controlling the temperature (Tf) or composition (XAf) of the mixture (often a feed to a
         downstream equipment) can be computed by taking the derivative of Equations F-6d and



         237        101 Tips for a Successful Automation Career
101Tips-Automation.book Page 238 Sunday, September 9, 2012 11:04 PM




              F-7d with respect to the manipulated flow stream 1 (F1) to give Equations F-8a and F-8b,
              respectively. In both cases, the process gain is inversely proportional to total flow (ΣFi).

                                                       K p = dT f / dF1 = T 1 /  F i                 (F-8a)

                                                     K p = dX Af / dF1 = X A1 /  F i                 (F-8b)

              The process deadtime for the manipulation of a flow for stream 1 (F1) is the summation of
              the injection delay for steam 1 and the piping delay from the point of injection to the point
              of temperature or composition measurement. For plug flow the residence time, which is
              the second expression in Equation F-8c completely becomes deadtime.

                                                 θ p = V1 / ( F1 / ρ 1 ) + V p / ( Fi / ρ i )         (F-8c)

              The process time constant is essentially zero for true plug flow. For a static mixer there is
              some back mixing, the residence time in Equation F-8c is split between a deadtime and
              time constant per Equations F-8d and F-8e.

                                              θ p = V1 / ( F1 / ρ 1 ) + x ∗ V p / ( Fi / ρ i )       (F-8d)

                                                    τ p = (1 − x ) ∗ V p / ( Fi / ρ i )              (F-8e)

              It is obvious from the above that both the process gain and deadtime are inversely propor-
              tional to total flow.

              Controller Tuning

              The implication of the results can be best seen if Lambda is set equal to the total loop dead-
              time ( θ o ) resulting in Equation F-9a for the controller gain. If the open loop time constant
              (τo) is large compared to the deadtime, the ratio of the open loop gain (Ko) to the time con-
              stant is the “near integrator” gain (Ki) shown in Equation F-9b which is the controller gain
              touted by the Simplified Internal Model Control (SIMC) as providing the best disturbance
              rejection. This controller gain is ½ of the gain from the Ziegler Nichols reaction curve
              method.

                                                                            τo                        (F-9a)
                                                            K c = 0.5 *
                                                                          Ko ∗θo

                                                                             1
                                                            K c = 0.5 *                               (F-9b)
                                                                          Ki ∗θo

              The time constant (τo) in the numerator of Equation F-9a is the largest time constant in the
              loop wherever it occurs. Hopefully, the process is mixed well enough and the
              instrumentation is fast enough that the largest time constant is in the process (τo = τp) and
              not the automation system. A large time constant in the process slows down the
              disturbance and is desirable. A large time constant in the measurement and final element
              is detrimental because it slows down the ability of the controller to see and react to
              disturbance, respectively.


                                       Appendix F: First Principle Process Gains, Deadtimes             238
101Tips-Automation.book Page 239 Sunday, September 9, 2012 11:04 PM




         The open loop gain (Ko) in the denominator is dimensionless. The process gain is actually
         the product of the manipulated variable gain, the process gain (KF), the gain of nonlinear
         process variables, and the controlled variable gain. For a loop that throttles a control valve,
         the manipulated variable gain is the slope of the valve’s installed characteristic. For the
         primary loop of a cascade control system, the manipulated variable gain is the secondary
         loop set point span divided by 100%. The controlled variable gain is 100% divided by the
         process variable span. Thus, changes in calibration span affect the computed controller
         gain.

         Finally, the deadtime ( θ o ) in the denominator is really the total loop deadtime, which is
         summation of the process deadtime ( θ p ) plus all the small time lags and delays in the
         loop. While the names open loop time constant (τo), open loop gain (Ko), and total loop
         deadtime ( θ o ) for the parameters in Equation F-10a are more definitive, nearly all of the
         control literature uses the terms process time constant, process gain, and process gain
         indiscriminately.

         Nomenclature

         Process Parameters:

               Ao =       cross-sectional area of liquid level (m2)
               A    =     heat transfer surface area (m2)
              Cp =        heat capacity of process (kJ/kg∗oC)
               Cw =       heat capacity of wall of heat transfer surface (kJ/kg∗oC)
               Fa =       agitator pumping rate (kg/sec)
              Ff    =     total feed flow (kg/sec)
              Fg =        gas flow (kg/sec)
              Fi    =     feed stream i flow (kg/sec)
              Fo =        vessel outlet flow (kg/sec)
              Fr =        recirculation flow (kg/sec)
              Fv =        vaporization rate (kg/sec)
              Hv =        heat of vaporization (kJ/kg)
              Hx =        heat of reaction (kJ/kg)
              Lo =        liquid level (m)
              MA =        component A mass (kg)
              Mg =        gas mass (kg)
              Mo =        liquid mass (kg)
              Mw =        mass of wall of heat transfer surface (kg)
              Pg =        gas pressure (kPa)
              Tf    =     total feed temperature (oC)
               Tg =       gas temperature (oC)


         239        101 Tips for a Successful Automation Career
101Tips-Automation.book Page 240 Sunday, September 9, 2012 11:04 PM




                    Ti    =    feed stream i temperature (oC)
                    To =       vessel outlet temperature (oC)
                    t     =    time (sec)
                    Qo =       total heat of liquid (kJ)
                    Qr =       heat from reaction (kJ)
                    Rx =       reaction rate (kg/sec)
                    Rg =       universal constant for ideal gas law (kPa∗m3/oC)
                    ρg =       gas density (kg/m3)
                    ρi    =    stream i density (kg/m3)
                    ρo =       liquid density (kg/m3)
                    ρv =       density of vapor (kg/m3)
                    U     =    overall heat transfer coefficient (kJ/m2∗oC)
                    Vg =       gas volume (m3)
                    Vi =       injection (e.g. dip tube or sparger ring) volume (m3)
                    Vp =       piping volume (m3)
                    x     =    fraction of volume that is plug flow
                    XAf =      total feed component A concentration (mass fraction)
                    XAi =      feed stream i component A concentration (mass fraction)
                    XAo =      vessel outlet component A concentration (mass fraction)

              Generic Terms:

                    X     =    process input (manipulated variable) (eu)
                    Y     =    process output (controlled variable) (eu)

              Dynamic Parameters:

                    Kc =       PID controller gain (dimensionless)
                    Ki =       integrating process gain (1/sec)
                    Ko =       open loop gain (dimensionless)
                    Kp =       process gain (eu/eu)
                    τp    =    process time constant (sec)
                    τo    =    open loop time constant (sec)
                    θp =       process deadtime (sec)
                    θo =       total loop deadtime (sec)




                                       Appendix F: First Principle Process Gains, Deadtimes   240
101Tips-Automation.book Page 241 Sunday, September 9, 2012 11:04 PM




         References

         1)    Boudreau, Michael, A., McMillan, Gregory K., and Wilson, Grant E., “Maximizing
               PAT Benefits from Bioprocess Modeling and Control”, Pharmaceutical technology IT
               Innovations Supplement, November, 2006.
         2.   Boudreau, Michael, A. and McMillan, Gregory K., New Directions in Bioprocess Model-
              ing and Control – Maximizing Process Analytical Technology Benefits, Instrumentation,
              Automation, and Systems (ISA), 2006.
         3.   McMillan, Gregory, Good Tuning – a Pocket Guide, 2nd edition, Instrumentation, Auto-
              mation, and Systems (ISA), 2005.
         4.    McMillan, Gregory and Cameron, Robert, Models Unleashed – Virtual Plant and Model
               Predictive Control Applications, Instrumentation, Automation, and Systems (ISA), 2004.
         5.   Blevins, Terrence L., McMillan, Gregory K., Wojsznis, Willy K., and Brown, Michael
              W., Advanced Control Unleashed – Plant Performance Management for Optimum Benefits,
              Instrumentation, Automation, and Systems (ISA), 2003.




         241        101 Tips for a Successful Automation Career

More Related Content

What's hot

Alternative Approach for Computing the Activation Factor of the PNLMS Algorithm
Alternative Approach for Computing the Activation Factor of the PNLMS AlgorithmAlternative Approach for Computing the Activation Factor of the PNLMS Algorithm
Alternative Approach for Computing the Activation Factor of the PNLMS AlgorithmFrancisco Souza
 
Computing Inner Eigenvalues of Matrices in Tensor Train Matrix Format
Computing Inner Eigenvalues of Matrices in Tensor Train Matrix FormatComputing Inner Eigenvalues of Matrices in Tensor Train Matrix Format
Computing Inner Eigenvalues of Matrices in Tensor Train Matrix FormatThomas Mach
 
Time Series Analysis
Time Series AnalysisTime Series Analysis
Time Series AnalysisAmit Ghosh
 
Ec8352 signals and systems 2 marks with answers
Ec8352 signals and systems   2 marks with answersEc8352 signals and systems   2 marks with answers
Ec8352 signals and systems 2 marks with answersGayathri Krishnamoorthy
 
Computation of the marginal likelihood
Computation of the marginal likelihoodComputation of the marginal likelihood
Computation of the marginal likelihoodBigMC
 
2008 : A Case Study: How to Speed Up the Simplex Algorithms on Problems Minim...
2008 : A Case Study: How to Speed Up the Simplex Algorithms on Problems Minim...2008 : A Case Study: How to Speed Up the Simplex Algorithms on Problems Minim...
2008 : A Case Study: How to Speed Up the Simplex Algorithms on Problems Minim...jensenbo
 
Paris2012 session1
Paris2012 session1Paris2012 session1
Paris2012 session1Cdiscount
 
Programming The Jesse Livermore Market Key
Programming The Jesse Livermore Market KeyProgramming The Jesse Livermore Market Key
Programming The Jesse Livermore Market Keyguest259106
 
Digital Signal Processing
Digital Signal ProcessingDigital Signal Processing
Digital Signal ProcessingSandip Ladi
 
Operations on Continuous Time Signals
Operations on Continuous Time SignalsOperations on Continuous Time Signals
Operations on Continuous Time SignalsAl-Amin Islam
 
Chapter 1 nonlinear
Chapter 1 nonlinearChapter 1 nonlinear
Chapter 1 nonlinearNBER
 
signals and systems
signals and systemssignals and systems
signals and systemsHoney jose
 
Regents Physics Pacing Map
Regents Physics Pacing MapRegents Physics Pacing Map
Regents Physics Pacing Mapjsawyer3434
 
Chapter 5 heterogeneous
Chapter 5 heterogeneousChapter 5 heterogeneous
Chapter 5 heterogeneousNBER
 

What's hot (19)

Alternative Approach for Computing the Activation Factor of the PNLMS Algorithm
Alternative Approach for Computing the Activation Factor of the PNLMS AlgorithmAlternative Approach for Computing the Activation Factor of the PNLMS Algorithm
Alternative Approach for Computing the Activation Factor of the PNLMS Algorithm
 
Computing Inner Eigenvalues of Matrices in Tensor Train Matrix Format
Computing Inner Eigenvalues of Matrices in Tensor Train Matrix FormatComputing Inner Eigenvalues of Matrices in Tensor Train Matrix Format
Computing Inner Eigenvalues of Matrices in Tensor Train Matrix Format
 
Time Series Analysis
Time Series AnalysisTime Series Analysis
Time Series Analysis
 
Ec8352 signals and systems 2 marks with answers
Ec8352 signals and systems   2 marks with answersEc8352 signals and systems   2 marks with answers
Ec8352 signals and systems 2 marks with answers
 
quantization
quantizationquantization
quantization
 
Computation of the marginal likelihood
Computation of the marginal likelihoodComputation of the marginal likelihood
Computation of the marginal likelihood
 
2008 : A Case Study: How to Speed Up the Simplex Algorithms on Problems Minim...
2008 : A Case Study: How to Speed Up the Simplex Algorithms on Problems Minim...2008 : A Case Study: How to Speed Up the Simplex Algorithms on Problems Minim...
2008 : A Case Study: How to Speed Up the Simplex Algorithms on Problems Minim...
 
Ch1
Ch1Ch1
Ch1
 
Paris2012 session1
Paris2012 session1Paris2012 session1
Paris2012 session1
 
OPERATIONS ON SIGNALS
OPERATIONS ON SIGNALSOPERATIONS ON SIGNALS
OPERATIONS ON SIGNALS
 
Programming The Jesse Livermore Market Key
Programming The Jesse Livermore Market KeyProgramming The Jesse Livermore Market Key
Programming The Jesse Livermore Market Key
 
Digital Signal Processing
Digital Signal ProcessingDigital Signal Processing
Digital Signal Processing
 
Operations on Continuous Time Signals
Operations on Continuous Time SignalsOperations on Continuous Time Signals
Operations on Continuous Time Signals
 
Chapter 1 nonlinear
Chapter 1 nonlinearChapter 1 nonlinear
Chapter 1 nonlinear
 
signals and systems
signals and systemssignals and systems
signals and systems
 
Regents Physics Pacing Map
Regents Physics Pacing MapRegents Physics Pacing Map
Regents Physics Pacing Map
 
Lecture123
Lecture123Lecture123
Lecture123
 
Calisto 2016a 251116
Calisto 2016a 251116Calisto 2016a 251116
Calisto 2016a 251116
 
Chapter 5 heterogeneous
Chapter 5 heterogeneousChapter 5 heterogeneous
Chapter 5 heterogeneous
 

Similar to 101 Tips for a Successful Automation Career Appendix F

The convenience yield implied by quadratic volatility smiles presentation [...
The convenience yield implied by quadratic volatility smiles   presentation [...The convenience yield implied by quadratic volatility smiles   presentation [...
The convenience yield implied by quadratic volatility smiles presentation [...yigalbt
 
MATHEON Center Days: Index determination and structural analysis using Algori...
MATHEON Center Days: Index determination and structural analysis using Algori...MATHEON Center Days: Index determination and structural analysis using Algori...
MATHEON Center Days: Index determination and structural analysis using Algori...Dagmar Monett
 
TR tabling presentation_2010_09
TR tabling presentation_2010_09TR tabling presentation_2010_09
TR tabling presentation_2010_09Paul Fodor
 
On estimating the integrated co volatility using
On estimating the integrated co volatility usingOn estimating the integrated co volatility using
On estimating the integrated co volatility usingkkislas
 
Andreas Eberle
Andreas EberleAndreas Eberle
Andreas EberleBigMC
 
Presentation cm2011
Presentation cm2011Presentation cm2011
Presentation cm2011antigonon
 
Presentation cm2011
Presentation cm2011Presentation cm2011
Presentation cm2011antigonon
 
Tele3113 wk9wed
Tele3113 wk9wedTele3113 wk9wed
Tele3113 wk9wedVin Voro
 
Lesson 27: Integration by Substitution (slides)
Lesson 27: Integration by Substitution (slides)Lesson 27: Integration by Substitution (slides)
Lesson 27: Integration by Substitution (slides)Mel Anthony Pepito
 
Lesson 27: Integration by Substitution (slides)
Lesson 27: Integration by Substitution (slides)Lesson 27: Integration by Substitution (slides)
Lesson 27: Integration by Substitution (slides)Matthew Leingang
 
On probability distributions
On probability distributionsOn probability distributions
On probability distributionsEric Xihui Lin
 
Bachelor_Defense
Bachelor_DefenseBachelor_Defense
Bachelor_DefenseTeja Turk
 
Unconditionally stable fdtd methods
Unconditionally stable fdtd methodsUnconditionally stable fdtd methods
Unconditionally stable fdtd methodsphysics Imposible
 
Dynamic Compression Transmission for Energy Harvesting Networks
Dynamic Compression Transmission for Energy Harvesting NetworksDynamic Compression Transmission for Energy Harvesting Networks
Dynamic Compression Transmission for Energy Harvesting NetworksCristiano Tapparello
 
Kernelization algorithms for graph and other structure modification problems
Kernelization algorithms for graph and other structure modification problemsKernelization algorithms for graph and other structure modification problems
Kernelization algorithms for graph and other structure modification problemsAnthony Perez
 

Similar to 101 Tips for a Successful Automation Career Appendix F (20)

Pll Basic Linkedin2
Pll Basic Linkedin2Pll Basic Linkedin2
Pll Basic Linkedin2
 
Ben Gal
Ben Gal Ben Gal
Ben Gal
 
The convenience yield implied by quadratic volatility smiles presentation [...
The convenience yield implied by quadratic volatility smiles   presentation [...The convenience yield implied by quadratic volatility smiles   presentation [...
The convenience yield implied by quadratic volatility smiles presentation [...
 
MATHEON Center Days: Index determination and structural analysis using Algori...
MATHEON Center Days: Index determination and structural analysis using Algori...MATHEON Center Days: Index determination and structural analysis using Algori...
MATHEON Center Days: Index determination and structural analysis using Algori...
 
TR tabling presentation_2010_09
TR tabling presentation_2010_09TR tabling presentation_2010_09
TR tabling presentation_2010_09
 
On estimating the integrated co volatility using
On estimating the integrated co volatility usingOn estimating the integrated co volatility using
On estimating the integrated co volatility using
 
Andreas Eberle
Andreas EberleAndreas Eberle
Andreas Eberle
 
Presentation cm2011
Presentation cm2011Presentation cm2011
Presentation cm2011
 
Presentation cm2011
Presentation cm2011Presentation cm2011
Presentation cm2011
 
Tele3113 wk9wed
Tele3113 wk9wedTele3113 wk9wed
Tele3113 wk9wed
 
03 lect5randomproc
03 lect5randomproc03 lect5randomproc
03 lect5randomproc
 
Lesson 27: Integration by Substitution (slides)
Lesson 27: Integration by Substitution (slides)Lesson 27: Integration by Substitution (slides)
Lesson 27: Integration by Substitution (slides)
 
Lesson 27: Integration by Substitution (slides)
Lesson 27: Integration by Substitution (slides)Lesson 27: Integration by Substitution (slides)
Lesson 27: Integration by Substitution (slides)
 
On probability distributions
On probability distributionsOn probability distributions
On probability distributions
 
Bachelor_Defense
Bachelor_DefenseBachelor_Defense
Bachelor_Defense
 
Fdtd
FdtdFdtd
Fdtd
 
Fdtd
FdtdFdtd
Fdtd
 
Unconditionally stable fdtd methods
Unconditionally stable fdtd methodsUnconditionally stable fdtd methods
Unconditionally stable fdtd methods
 
Dynamic Compression Transmission for Energy Harvesting Networks
Dynamic Compression Transmission for Energy Harvesting NetworksDynamic Compression Transmission for Energy Harvesting Networks
Dynamic Compression Transmission for Energy Harvesting Networks
 
Kernelization algorithms for graph and other structure modification problems
Kernelization algorithms for graph and other structure modification problemsKernelization algorithms for graph and other structure modification problems
Kernelization algorithms for graph and other structure modification problems
 

More from ISA Interchange

An optimal general type-2 fuzzy controller for Urban Traffic Network
An optimal general type-2 fuzzy controller for Urban Traffic NetworkAn optimal general type-2 fuzzy controller for Urban Traffic Network
An optimal general type-2 fuzzy controller for Urban Traffic NetworkISA Interchange
 
Embedded intelligent adaptive PI controller for an electromechanical system
Embedded intelligent adaptive PI controller for an electromechanical  systemEmbedded intelligent adaptive PI controller for an electromechanical  system
Embedded intelligent adaptive PI controller for an electromechanical systemISA Interchange
 
State of charge estimation of lithium-ion batteries using fractional order sl...
State of charge estimation of lithium-ion batteries using fractional order sl...State of charge estimation of lithium-ion batteries using fractional order sl...
State of charge estimation of lithium-ion batteries using fractional order sl...ISA Interchange
 
Fractional order PID for tracking control of a parallel robotic manipulator t...
Fractional order PID for tracking control of a parallel robotic manipulator t...Fractional order PID for tracking control of a parallel robotic manipulator t...
Fractional order PID for tracking control of a parallel robotic manipulator t...ISA Interchange
 
Fuzzy logic for plant-wide control of biological wastewater treatment process...
Fuzzy logic for plant-wide control of biological wastewater treatment process...Fuzzy logic for plant-wide control of biological wastewater treatment process...
Fuzzy logic for plant-wide control of biological wastewater treatment process...ISA Interchange
 
Design and implementation of a control structure for quality products in a cr...
Design and implementation of a control structure for quality products in a cr...Design and implementation of a control structure for quality products in a cr...
Design and implementation of a control structure for quality products in a cr...ISA Interchange
 
Model based PI power system stabilizer design for damping low frequency oscil...
Model based PI power system stabilizer design for damping low frequency oscil...Model based PI power system stabilizer design for damping low frequency oscil...
Model based PI power system stabilizer design for damping low frequency oscil...ISA Interchange
 
A comparison of a novel robust decentralized control strategy and MPC for ind...
A comparison of a novel robust decentralized control strategy and MPC for ind...A comparison of a novel robust decentralized control strategy and MPC for ind...
A comparison of a novel robust decentralized control strategy and MPC for ind...ISA Interchange
 
Fault detection of feed water treatment process using PCA-WD with parameter o...
Fault detection of feed water treatment process using PCA-WD with parameter o...Fault detection of feed water treatment process using PCA-WD with parameter o...
Fault detection of feed water treatment process using PCA-WD with parameter o...ISA Interchange
 
Model-based adaptive sliding mode control of the subcritical boiler-turbine s...
Model-based adaptive sliding mode control of the subcritical boiler-turbine s...Model-based adaptive sliding mode control of the subcritical boiler-turbine s...
Model-based adaptive sliding mode control of the subcritical boiler-turbine s...ISA Interchange
 
A Proportional Integral Estimator-Based Clock Synchronization Protocol for Wi...
A Proportional Integral Estimator-Based Clock Synchronization Protocol for Wi...A Proportional Integral Estimator-Based Clock Synchronization Protocol for Wi...
A Proportional Integral Estimator-Based Clock Synchronization Protocol for Wi...ISA Interchange
 
An artificial intelligence based improved classification of two-phase flow patte...
An artificial intelligence based improved classification of two-phase flow patte...An artificial intelligence based improved classification of two-phase flow patte...
An artificial intelligence based improved classification of two-phase flow patte...ISA Interchange
 
New Method for Tuning PID Controllers Using a Symmetric Send-On-Delta Samplin...
New Method for Tuning PID Controllers Using a Symmetric Send-On-Delta Samplin...New Method for Tuning PID Controllers Using a Symmetric Send-On-Delta Samplin...
New Method for Tuning PID Controllers Using a Symmetric Send-On-Delta Samplin...ISA Interchange
 
Load estimator-based hybrid controller design for two-interleaved boost conve...
Load estimator-based hybrid controller design for two-interleaved boost conve...Load estimator-based hybrid controller design for two-interleaved boost conve...
Load estimator-based hybrid controller design for two-interleaved boost conve...ISA Interchange
 
Effects of Wireless Packet Loss in Industrial Process Control Systems
Effects of Wireless Packet Loss in Industrial Process Control SystemsEffects of Wireless Packet Loss in Industrial Process Control Systems
Effects of Wireless Packet Loss in Industrial Process Control SystemsISA Interchange
 
Fault Detection in the Distillation Column Process
Fault Detection in the Distillation Column ProcessFault Detection in the Distillation Column Process
Fault Detection in the Distillation Column ProcessISA Interchange
 
Neural Network-Based Actuator Fault Diagnosis for a Non-Linear Multi-Tank System
Neural Network-Based Actuator Fault Diagnosis for a Non-Linear Multi-Tank SystemNeural Network-Based Actuator Fault Diagnosis for a Non-Linear Multi-Tank System
Neural Network-Based Actuator Fault Diagnosis for a Non-Linear Multi-Tank SystemISA Interchange
 
A KPI-based process monitoring and fault detection framework for large-scale ...
A KPI-based process monitoring and fault detection framework for large-scale ...A KPI-based process monitoring and fault detection framework for large-scale ...
A KPI-based process monitoring and fault detection framework for large-scale ...ISA Interchange
 
An adaptive PID like controller using mix locally recurrent neural network fo...
An adaptive PID like controller using mix locally recurrent neural network fo...An adaptive PID like controller using mix locally recurrent neural network fo...
An adaptive PID like controller using mix locally recurrent neural network fo...ISA Interchange
 
A method to remove chattering alarms using median filters
A method to remove chattering alarms using median filtersA method to remove chattering alarms using median filters
A method to remove chattering alarms using median filtersISA Interchange
 

More from ISA Interchange (20)

An optimal general type-2 fuzzy controller for Urban Traffic Network
An optimal general type-2 fuzzy controller for Urban Traffic NetworkAn optimal general type-2 fuzzy controller for Urban Traffic Network
An optimal general type-2 fuzzy controller for Urban Traffic Network
 
Embedded intelligent adaptive PI controller for an electromechanical system
Embedded intelligent adaptive PI controller for an electromechanical  systemEmbedded intelligent adaptive PI controller for an electromechanical  system
Embedded intelligent adaptive PI controller for an electromechanical system
 
State of charge estimation of lithium-ion batteries using fractional order sl...
State of charge estimation of lithium-ion batteries using fractional order sl...State of charge estimation of lithium-ion batteries using fractional order sl...
State of charge estimation of lithium-ion batteries using fractional order sl...
 
Fractional order PID for tracking control of a parallel robotic manipulator t...
Fractional order PID for tracking control of a parallel robotic manipulator t...Fractional order PID for tracking control of a parallel robotic manipulator t...
Fractional order PID for tracking control of a parallel robotic manipulator t...
 
Fuzzy logic for plant-wide control of biological wastewater treatment process...
Fuzzy logic for plant-wide control of biological wastewater treatment process...Fuzzy logic for plant-wide control of biological wastewater treatment process...
Fuzzy logic for plant-wide control of biological wastewater treatment process...
 
Design and implementation of a control structure for quality products in a cr...
Design and implementation of a control structure for quality products in a cr...Design and implementation of a control structure for quality products in a cr...
Design and implementation of a control structure for quality products in a cr...
 
Model based PI power system stabilizer design for damping low frequency oscil...
Model based PI power system stabilizer design for damping low frequency oscil...Model based PI power system stabilizer design for damping low frequency oscil...
Model based PI power system stabilizer design for damping low frequency oscil...
 
A comparison of a novel robust decentralized control strategy and MPC for ind...
A comparison of a novel robust decentralized control strategy and MPC for ind...A comparison of a novel robust decentralized control strategy and MPC for ind...
A comparison of a novel robust decentralized control strategy and MPC for ind...
 
Fault detection of feed water treatment process using PCA-WD with parameter o...
Fault detection of feed water treatment process using PCA-WD with parameter o...Fault detection of feed water treatment process using PCA-WD with parameter o...
Fault detection of feed water treatment process using PCA-WD with parameter o...
 
Model-based adaptive sliding mode control of the subcritical boiler-turbine s...
Model-based adaptive sliding mode control of the subcritical boiler-turbine s...Model-based adaptive sliding mode control of the subcritical boiler-turbine s...
Model-based adaptive sliding mode control of the subcritical boiler-turbine s...
 
A Proportional Integral Estimator-Based Clock Synchronization Protocol for Wi...
A Proportional Integral Estimator-Based Clock Synchronization Protocol for Wi...A Proportional Integral Estimator-Based Clock Synchronization Protocol for Wi...
A Proportional Integral Estimator-Based Clock Synchronization Protocol for Wi...
 
An artificial intelligence based improved classification of two-phase flow patte...
An artificial intelligence based improved classification of two-phase flow patte...An artificial intelligence based improved classification of two-phase flow patte...
An artificial intelligence based improved classification of two-phase flow patte...
 
New Method for Tuning PID Controllers Using a Symmetric Send-On-Delta Samplin...
New Method for Tuning PID Controllers Using a Symmetric Send-On-Delta Samplin...New Method for Tuning PID Controllers Using a Symmetric Send-On-Delta Samplin...
New Method for Tuning PID Controllers Using a Symmetric Send-On-Delta Samplin...
 
Load estimator-based hybrid controller design for two-interleaved boost conve...
Load estimator-based hybrid controller design for two-interleaved boost conve...Load estimator-based hybrid controller design for two-interleaved boost conve...
Load estimator-based hybrid controller design for two-interleaved boost conve...
 
Effects of Wireless Packet Loss in Industrial Process Control Systems
Effects of Wireless Packet Loss in Industrial Process Control SystemsEffects of Wireless Packet Loss in Industrial Process Control Systems
Effects of Wireless Packet Loss in Industrial Process Control Systems
 
Fault Detection in the Distillation Column Process
Fault Detection in the Distillation Column ProcessFault Detection in the Distillation Column Process
Fault Detection in the Distillation Column Process
 
Neural Network-Based Actuator Fault Diagnosis for a Non-Linear Multi-Tank System
Neural Network-Based Actuator Fault Diagnosis for a Non-Linear Multi-Tank SystemNeural Network-Based Actuator Fault Diagnosis for a Non-Linear Multi-Tank System
Neural Network-Based Actuator Fault Diagnosis for a Non-Linear Multi-Tank System
 
A KPI-based process monitoring and fault detection framework for large-scale ...
A KPI-based process monitoring and fault detection framework for large-scale ...A KPI-based process monitoring and fault detection framework for large-scale ...
A KPI-based process monitoring and fault detection framework for large-scale ...
 
An adaptive PID like controller using mix locally recurrent neural network fo...
An adaptive PID like controller using mix locally recurrent neural network fo...An adaptive PID like controller using mix locally recurrent neural network fo...
An adaptive PID like controller using mix locally recurrent neural network fo...
 
A method to remove chattering alarms using median filters
A method to remove chattering alarms using median filtersA method to remove chattering alarms using median filters
A method to remove chattering alarms using median filters
 

Recently uploaded

Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3
Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3
Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3JemimahLaneBuaron
 
Sports & Fitness Value Added Course FY..
Sports & Fitness Value Added Course FY..Sports & Fitness Value Added Course FY..
Sports & Fitness Value Added Course FY..Disha Kariya
 
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activityParis 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activityGeoBlogs
 
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104misteraugie
 
BAG TECHNIQUE Bag technique-a tool making use of public health bag through wh...
BAG TECHNIQUE Bag technique-a tool making use of public health bag through wh...BAG TECHNIQUE Bag technique-a tool making use of public health bag through wh...
BAG TECHNIQUE Bag technique-a tool making use of public health bag through wh...Sapna Thakur
 
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptxThe basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptxheathfieldcps1
 
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across Sectors
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across SectorsAPM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across Sectors
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across SectorsAssociation for Project Management
 
Interactive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communication
Interactive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communicationInteractive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communication
Interactive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communicationnomboosow
 
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in DelhiRussian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhikauryashika82
 
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptxUnit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptxVishalSingh1417
 
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdfKey note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdfAdmir Softic
 
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The BasicsIntroduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The BasicsTechSoup
 
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot GraphZ Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot GraphThiyagu K
 
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdfActivity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdfciinovamais
 
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...christianmathematics
 
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy ReformA Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy ReformChameera Dedduwage
 
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi 6.pdf
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi  6.pdf1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi  6.pdf
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi 6.pdfQucHHunhnh
 
Measures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SD
Measures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SDMeasures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SD
Measures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SDThiyagu K
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3
Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3
Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3
 
Sports & Fitness Value Added Course FY..
Sports & Fitness Value Added Course FY..Sports & Fitness Value Added Course FY..
Sports & Fitness Value Added Course FY..
 
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activityParis 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
 
Advance Mobile Application Development class 07
Advance Mobile Application Development class 07Advance Mobile Application Development class 07
Advance Mobile Application Development class 07
 
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104
 
BAG TECHNIQUE Bag technique-a tool making use of public health bag through wh...
BAG TECHNIQUE Bag technique-a tool making use of public health bag through wh...BAG TECHNIQUE Bag technique-a tool making use of public health bag through wh...
BAG TECHNIQUE Bag technique-a tool making use of public health bag through wh...
 
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptxThe basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
 
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across Sectors
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across SectorsAPM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across Sectors
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across Sectors
 
Interactive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communication
Interactive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communicationInteractive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communication
Interactive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communication
 
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in DelhiRussian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
 
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptxUnit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
 
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdfKey note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
 
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The BasicsIntroduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
 
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot GraphZ Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
 
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdfActivity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
 
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
 
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Structured Data, Assistants, & RAG"
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Structured Data, Assistants, & RAG"Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Structured Data, Assistants, & RAG"
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Structured Data, Assistants, & RAG"
 
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy ReformA Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
 
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi 6.pdf
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi  6.pdf1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi  6.pdf
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi 6.pdf
 
Measures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SD
Measures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SDMeasures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SD
Measures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SD
 

101 Tips for a Successful Automation Career Appendix F

  • 1. 101Tips-Automation.book Page 231 Sunday, September 9, 2012 11:04 PM Appendix F: First Principle Process Gains, Deadtimes, and Time Constants There are three types of processes; self-regulating, integrating, and runaway as shown in Figures F-1, F-2, and F-3, respectively. A self-regulating process will decelerate to a new steady state. An integrating process will continually ramp. A runaway process will accel- erate until hitting a relief or interlock setting. Over 90% of the processes are self-regulating. However, many of the continuous and fed- batch processes in the chemical industry with the greatest direct economic benefits behave and can be best treated as “near integrating” processes. The classic integrating process is a pure batch or level process. Less than 1% of the processes are runaway. When these exist, understanding the runaway response is critical in terms of safety and control because of the propensity to accelerate and reach a point of no return. Runaway responses are almost exclusively associated with highly exothermic reactors used in plastics and specialty chemical production. This note develops the equations for process dynamics for back mixed volumes and plug flow volumes. The back mixed volumes section applies to volumes whenever an agitator pumping rate, an eductor or recirculation liquid flow rate, or gas evolution or sparge rate produces enough turbulence and back mixing to make the mixture more uniform in the axial besides the radial direction of the volume. Gas volumes generally have enough tur- bulence and a fast enough gas dispersion rates to be treated as a back mixed volume. The equations therefore hold relatively well for an evaporator and a single distillation stage due to turbulence from the vapor flow. The plug volume section applies to static mixers, pipelines, coil inlets, and jacket inlets where the turbulence from pipe fittings or internal mixing elements creates enough radial mixing to make the mixture uniform over the cross-section of the pipe or nozzle inlet but little axial mixing. Back Mixed Volumes For a back mixed volume, the process gains and time constants can be readily identified if the ordinary differential equations for the rate of accumulation of energy or material in the volume are set up so that the process output of interest (Y) is on right side with a unity coefficient. From this simple generic form we can identify the process time constant (τp) as the coefficient of derivative of the process output (dY/dt) and the process gain (Kp) as the coefficient of the process input (X). The process output (Y) and input (X) can be viewed as the controlled and manipulated variables, respectively. Many other terms can exist but these are not shown in the following equations. These missing terms can be categorized as disturbances. If the sign of the unity coefficient of the process output on the right side is negative (Equa- tion F-1a), the process has negative feedback. As the process output changes, the negative 231 101 Tips for a Successful Automation Career
  • 2. 101Tips-Automation.book Page 232 Sunday, September 9, 2012 11:04 PM Process Output (Y) & Process Input (X) New Steady State Y Kp = ΔY / ΔX (Self-Regulating Process Gain) X ΔY 0.63∗ΔY ΔX Noise Band Time (t) θp τp Process Self-Regulating Process Dead Time Time Constant Figure F-1. Self-regulating (negative feedback) process Process Output (Y) & Process Input (X) Y Ki = { [ ΔY2 / Δt2 ] − [ ΔY1 / Δt1 ] } / ΔX (Integrating Process Gain) X ΔX ramp rate is ramp rate is ΔY1 / Δt1 ΔY2 / Δt2 Time (t) θp Process Dead Time Figure F-2. Integrating (zero feedback) process Appendix F: First Principle Process Gains, Deadtimes 232
  • 3. 101Tips-Automation.book Page 233 Sunday, September 9, 2012 11:04 PM Process Output (Y) & Process Input (X) Y Kp = ΔY / ΔX Acceleration (Runaway Process Gain) X 1.72∗ΔY ΔY ΔX Noise Band Time (t) θp τp’ Process Runaway Process Dead Time Time Constant Figure F-3. Runaway (positive feedback) process feedback slows down and eventually halts the excursion of the process output at its new steady state when it balances out the effect of the process input and the disturbances. τ p ∗ dY / dt = K p ∗ X − Y (F-1a) The integration of this equation provides the time response of a change in the process out- put (ΔY) for a change in the process input (ΔX). −t / τ p ΔY = K p ∗ (1 − e ) ∗ ΔX (F-1b) If the process output does not appear on the right side (Equation F-2a), there is no process feedback. As the process output changes, there is no feedback to slow it down or speed it up so it continues to ramp. There is no steady state. The ramping will only stop when X is zero or balances out the disturbances. dY / dt = K i ∗ X (F-2a) ΔY = K i ∗ Δt ∗ ΔX (F-2b) Often in the more important loops for concentration, pressure, and temperature control of large volumes, the time constant in Equation F-1a is so large that the time to reach steady state is beyond the time frame of interest. Since these loops with small deadtime to time constant ratios should be tuned with small Lambda factors (high controller gains) per Advanced Application Note 3, the controller only sees the first part of the excursion before 233 101 Tips for a Successful Automation Career
  • 4. 101Tips-Automation.book Page 234 Sunday, September 9, 2012 11:04 PM the inflection point and deceleration by negative process feedback. In this case we have a “near Integrator” and Equation F-1a is best visualized as Equation F-2a with an integrator gain calculated per Equation F-2c. K i = K p /τ p (F-2c) If the sign of the unity coefficient of the process output on the right side is positive (Equa- tion F-3a), the process has positive feedback. As the process output changes, the positive feedback speeds up the excursion unless disturbances counteract the effect of the process input and output. τ p ∗ dY / dt = K p ∗ X + Y (F-3a) t /τ p ΔY = K p ∗ ( e − 1) ∗ ΔX (F-3b) Consider a mixed volume with a jacket and vapor space as shown in Figure F-4. There are liquid reactant feeds, gas feeds (sparged through the liquid and added directly to the vapor space), an outlet liquid flow, a vent gas flow, and a jacket coolant flow. There is normally multiple components interest. For example, consider liquid or gas acid and base reagent or reactant components (a, b) to produce primary and secondary liquid or gas products (c, d, e). Consider also there are typically water and nitrogen gas compo- nents (w, n). The ordinary differential equation for the accumulation of liquid mass as shown in Equa- tion F-4a includes inlet flows added directly to the liquid volume (ΣFi), vapor flow rates from evaporation and vaporization (ΣFv), and an outlet liquid flow rate (Fo). The liquid level depends upon density and cross-section area of the liquid. Equation F-4a can then be reformulated to Equation F-4b to include the process variable of interest, liquid level (Ll), in the derivative. dM o / dt =  F i −  F v − F o (F-4a) d ( ρ o ∗ Ao ∗ Lo ) / dt =  F i −  F v − F o (F-4b) If we consider the density (ρo) to be a weak function of composition and therefore constant like the cross-sectional area (Ao) we can take these terms outside the derivative and divide through to get an equation for level (Lo) in the form of F-2a. Now it is clearly evident that the integrating process gain (Ki) for manipulation of flows in or flow out is simply the inverse of the product of the liquid density and cross-section area (Equation F-4d). dLo / dt = [1 /( ρ o ∗ Ao )]∗ [ F i −  F v − F o ] (F-4c) K i = 1 /( ρ o ∗ Ao ) (F-4d) The ordinary differential equation for the accumulation of gas mass as shown in Equation F-5a includes inlet flows added directly to the gas volume (ΣFi), vapor flow rates from gas sparging, evolution, and vaporization (ΣFv), and an exit gas flow rate (Fg). Equations of state such as the ideal gas law can be used to express this relationship for a given composi- Appendix F: First Principle Process Gains, Deadtimes 234
  • 5. 101Tips-Automation.book Page 235 Sunday, September 9, 2012 11:04 PM tion. Equation F-5a can then be reformulated to Equation F-5b to include the process vari- able of interest, gas pressure (Pg), in the derivative. dM g / dt =  F i +  F v − F g (F-5a) d [ ( P g * V g ) ⁄ ( R g * T g ) ] ⁄ dt =  Fi +  Fv – Fg (F-5b) If we consider changes in the gas volume (Vg) and gas temperature (Tg) to be much slower than changes in the gas pressure (Pg) and therefore relatively constant during the integra- tion step we can take these terms outside the derivative and divide through to get an equa- tion for pressure in the form of Equation F-2a. Now it is clearly evident that the integrating process gain (Ki) for manipulation of flows in or flow out is simply the product of the uni- versal gas coefficient (Rg) and the absolute gas temperature divided by the gas volume (Equation F-5d). This assumes a change in pressure does not significantly change the gas glow out of the volume, which is normally the case for a pressure drop across the vent valve that is large or critical. dP ⁄ dt = [ ( R * T ) ⁄ V ] * [  F +  F – F ] (F-5c) g g g g i v g Ki = [ ( Rg * Tg ) ⁄ Vg ] (F-5d) The ordinary differential equation for the accumulation of energy as shown in Equation F- 6a includes the effects of feed temperature, heat of reaction as a function of temperature, heat of vaporization, and heat transfer to the jacket. If we consider the specific heat capac- ity relatively constant and use the multiplicative rule of integration, we can express the differential equation in the generic form of Equation F-2a in terms of temperature to show the process feedback. The relative magnitude of the terms in the denominator of Equation F-6g determines the feedback sign. dQo / dt = C p ∗ ( F i ∗T i) − C p ∗ F o ∗T o + ( ΔQr / ΔT o) ∗T o − H v ∗ F v − U ∗ A ∗ (T o − T j ) (F-6a) dQo / dt = d (C p ∗ M o ∗T o) / dt = C p ∗ ( d M o / dt ) ∗T o + C p ∗ M o ∗( dT o / dt ) (F-6b) Ff = F i (F-6c) T f = ( F i ∗T i) /  F i (F-6d) C p ∗ (d M o / dt ) ∗T o = C p ∗ ( F f − F o ) ∗T o (F-6e) C p *M o * ( dT o ⁄ dt ) = C p *F f *T f + H x *R x – H v *F v + U*A*T j (F-6f) – [ C p *F f + ΔQ r ⁄ ΔT o + U*A ]*T o 235 101 Tips for a Successful Automation Career
  • 6. 101Tips-Automation.book Page 236 Sunday, September 9, 2012 11:04 PM For the manipulation of jacket temperature to control outlet temperature, the main process time constant (τp) is (positive feedback if heat of feed and reaction exceeds product of heat transfer coefficient and area): τ p = ( C p *M o ) ⁄ [ C p *F f + ΔQ r ⁄ ΔT o + U*A ] (F-6g) For the manipulation of jacket temperature to control outlet temperature, the process gain (Kp) is: K p = ( U*A ) ⁄ [ C p *F f + ΔQ r ⁄ ΔT o + U*A ] (F-6h) For the manipulation of jacket temperature to control outlet temperature, the near integra- tor gain (Ki) is: K i = (U ∗ A ) / (C p ∗ M o ) (F-6i) For the manipulation of feed temperature to control outlet temperature, the process gain (Kp) is: K p = ( C p *F f ) ⁄ [ C p *F f + ΔQ r ⁄ ΔT o + U*A ] (F-6j) For the manipulation of feed flow to control outlet temperature, the process gain (Kp) is: K p = ( C p *T f ) ⁄ [ C p *F f + ΔQ r ⁄ ΔT o + U*A ] (F-6k) For manipulation of jacket temperature, the additional small secondary process time con- stant associated with the heat capacity and mass of the jacket wall is: τ p = ( C w *M w ) ⁄ [ U*A ] (F-6l) Any change in the temperature at the heat transfer surfaces or the feed inlet must be dis- persed and back mixed into the volume. This process deadtime ( θ p ) is the turn over time that can be approximated as the liquid inventory divided by the summation of the feed flow rate (Ff), agitator pumping rate (Fa), recirculation flow rate (Fr), and vapor evolution rate or vapor bubble rate (Fv). Since this turn over time is computed in terms of volumetric flow rates, the liquid mass and the mass flow rates are divided by their respective densi- ties as shown in Equation F-6m. θp = ( Mo ⁄ ρo ) ⁄ [ ( Ff + Fa + Fr ) ⁄ ρo + Fv ⁄ ρv ] (F-6m) If there is an injector (dip tube or sparger ring) volume, a change in composition at the nozzle must propagate by plug flow to the discharge points of the dip tube or sparger ring. The deadtime for a feed flow (F1) is the injector volume (V1) divided by the injection mass flow (F1) divided by its respective density (ρ1). θ p = V1 / ( F1 / ρ 1 ) (F-6n) Appendix F: First Principle Process Gains, Deadtimes 236
  • 7. 101Tips-Automation.book Page 237 Sunday, September 9, 2012 11:04 PM The ordinary differential equation for the accumulation of liquid reactant mass (MA) as shown in Equation F-7a includes the effects of feeds (Fi) with a reactant mass fraction (XAi), reaction rate (Rx), and outlet flow (Fo). The feeds can be from raw material, interme- diate products, recycle streams, or multi-stage reactors. If we use the multiplicative rule of integration, we can express the differential equation in the generic form of Equation F-2a in terms of concentration to show the process feedback. dM A / dt = ( F i ∗ X Ai) − ( R x + F o) ∗ X Ao (F-7a) dM A / dt = d ( M o ∗ X Ao) / dt = ( d M o / dt ) ∗ X Ao + M o ∗( dX Ao / dt ) (F-7b) Ff = F i (F-7c) X Af = ( F i ∗ X Ai) /  F i (F-7d) (d M o / dt ) ∗ X Ao = ( F f − F o) ∗ X Ao (F-7e) M o∗ ( dX Ao / dt ) = F f ∗ X Af − ( R x + F f ) ∗ X Ao (F-7f) For the manipulation of feed flow to control reactant concentration (XAo), the main process time constant (τp) is: τ p = M o / (Rx + F f ) (F-7g) For the manipulation of feed flow to control reactant concentration (XAo), the process gain (Kp) is: K p = X Af / ( R x + F f ) (F-7h) For the manipulation of feed flow to control reactant concentration, the near integrator gain (Ki) is: Ki = X Af / M o (F-7i) For the manipulation of feed concentration to control reactant concentration, the process gain (Kp) is: K p = F f /( R x + F f ) (F-7j) The process deadtimes from turnover time and from feed injection are the same as com- puted in the section for temperature control (Equations F-6m and F-6n). Plug Flow Volumes For plug flow volumes where different streams are being combined, the process gain for controlling the temperature (Tf) or composition (XAf) of the mixture (often a feed to a downstream equipment) can be computed by taking the derivative of Equations F-6d and 237 101 Tips for a Successful Automation Career
  • 8. 101Tips-Automation.book Page 238 Sunday, September 9, 2012 11:04 PM F-7d with respect to the manipulated flow stream 1 (F1) to give Equations F-8a and F-8b, respectively. In both cases, the process gain is inversely proportional to total flow (ΣFi). K p = dT f / dF1 = T 1 /  F i (F-8a) K p = dX Af / dF1 = X A1 /  F i (F-8b) The process deadtime for the manipulation of a flow for stream 1 (F1) is the summation of the injection delay for steam 1 and the piping delay from the point of injection to the point of temperature or composition measurement. For plug flow the residence time, which is the second expression in Equation F-8c completely becomes deadtime. θ p = V1 / ( F1 / ρ 1 ) + V p / ( Fi / ρ i ) (F-8c) The process time constant is essentially zero for true plug flow. For a static mixer there is some back mixing, the residence time in Equation F-8c is split between a deadtime and time constant per Equations F-8d and F-8e. θ p = V1 / ( F1 / ρ 1 ) + x ∗ V p / ( Fi / ρ i ) (F-8d) τ p = (1 − x ) ∗ V p / ( Fi / ρ i ) (F-8e) It is obvious from the above that both the process gain and deadtime are inversely propor- tional to total flow. Controller Tuning The implication of the results can be best seen if Lambda is set equal to the total loop dead- time ( θ o ) resulting in Equation F-9a for the controller gain. If the open loop time constant (τo) is large compared to the deadtime, the ratio of the open loop gain (Ko) to the time con- stant is the “near integrator” gain (Ki) shown in Equation F-9b which is the controller gain touted by the Simplified Internal Model Control (SIMC) as providing the best disturbance rejection. This controller gain is ½ of the gain from the Ziegler Nichols reaction curve method. τo (F-9a) K c = 0.5 * Ko ∗θo 1 K c = 0.5 * (F-9b) Ki ∗θo The time constant (τo) in the numerator of Equation F-9a is the largest time constant in the loop wherever it occurs. Hopefully, the process is mixed well enough and the instrumentation is fast enough that the largest time constant is in the process (τo = τp) and not the automation system. A large time constant in the process slows down the disturbance and is desirable. A large time constant in the measurement and final element is detrimental because it slows down the ability of the controller to see and react to disturbance, respectively. Appendix F: First Principle Process Gains, Deadtimes 238
  • 9. 101Tips-Automation.book Page 239 Sunday, September 9, 2012 11:04 PM The open loop gain (Ko) in the denominator is dimensionless. The process gain is actually the product of the manipulated variable gain, the process gain (KF), the gain of nonlinear process variables, and the controlled variable gain. For a loop that throttles a control valve, the manipulated variable gain is the slope of the valve’s installed characteristic. For the primary loop of a cascade control system, the manipulated variable gain is the secondary loop set point span divided by 100%. The controlled variable gain is 100% divided by the process variable span. Thus, changes in calibration span affect the computed controller gain. Finally, the deadtime ( θ o ) in the denominator is really the total loop deadtime, which is summation of the process deadtime ( θ p ) plus all the small time lags and delays in the loop. While the names open loop time constant (τo), open loop gain (Ko), and total loop deadtime ( θ o ) for the parameters in Equation F-10a are more definitive, nearly all of the control literature uses the terms process time constant, process gain, and process gain indiscriminately. Nomenclature Process Parameters: Ao = cross-sectional area of liquid level (m2) A = heat transfer surface area (m2) Cp = heat capacity of process (kJ/kg∗oC) Cw = heat capacity of wall of heat transfer surface (kJ/kg∗oC) Fa = agitator pumping rate (kg/sec) Ff = total feed flow (kg/sec) Fg = gas flow (kg/sec) Fi = feed stream i flow (kg/sec) Fo = vessel outlet flow (kg/sec) Fr = recirculation flow (kg/sec) Fv = vaporization rate (kg/sec) Hv = heat of vaporization (kJ/kg) Hx = heat of reaction (kJ/kg) Lo = liquid level (m) MA = component A mass (kg) Mg = gas mass (kg) Mo = liquid mass (kg) Mw = mass of wall of heat transfer surface (kg) Pg = gas pressure (kPa) Tf = total feed temperature (oC) Tg = gas temperature (oC) 239 101 Tips for a Successful Automation Career
  • 10. 101Tips-Automation.book Page 240 Sunday, September 9, 2012 11:04 PM Ti = feed stream i temperature (oC) To = vessel outlet temperature (oC) t = time (sec) Qo = total heat of liquid (kJ) Qr = heat from reaction (kJ) Rx = reaction rate (kg/sec) Rg = universal constant for ideal gas law (kPa∗m3/oC) ρg = gas density (kg/m3) ρi = stream i density (kg/m3) ρo = liquid density (kg/m3) ρv = density of vapor (kg/m3) U = overall heat transfer coefficient (kJ/m2∗oC) Vg = gas volume (m3) Vi = injection (e.g. dip tube or sparger ring) volume (m3) Vp = piping volume (m3) x = fraction of volume that is plug flow XAf = total feed component A concentration (mass fraction) XAi = feed stream i component A concentration (mass fraction) XAo = vessel outlet component A concentration (mass fraction) Generic Terms: X = process input (manipulated variable) (eu) Y = process output (controlled variable) (eu) Dynamic Parameters: Kc = PID controller gain (dimensionless) Ki = integrating process gain (1/sec) Ko = open loop gain (dimensionless) Kp = process gain (eu/eu) τp = process time constant (sec) τo = open loop time constant (sec) θp = process deadtime (sec) θo = total loop deadtime (sec) Appendix F: First Principle Process Gains, Deadtimes 240
  • 11. 101Tips-Automation.book Page 241 Sunday, September 9, 2012 11:04 PM References 1) Boudreau, Michael, A., McMillan, Gregory K., and Wilson, Grant E., “Maximizing PAT Benefits from Bioprocess Modeling and Control”, Pharmaceutical technology IT Innovations Supplement, November, 2006. 2. Boudreau, Michael, A. and McMillan, Gregory K., New Directions in Bioprocess Model- ing and Control – Maximizing Process Analytical Technology Benefits, Instrumentation, Automation, and Systems (ISA), 2006. 3. McMillan, Gregory, Good Tuning – a Pocket Guide, 2nd edition, Instrumentation, Auto- mation, and Systems (ISA), 2005. 4. McMillan, Gregory and Cameron, Robert, Models Unleashed – Virtual Plant and Model Predictive Control Applications, Instrumentation, Automation, and Systems (ISA), 2004. 5. Blevins, Terrence L., McMillan, Gregory K., Wojsznis, Willy K., and Brown, Michael W., Advanced Control Unleashed – Plant Performance Management for Optimum Benefits, Instrumentation, Automation, and Systems (ISA), 2003. 241 101 Tips for a Successful Automation Career