SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 3
Download to read offline
Shailesh T. Patel, Sunil Garg, Ramakant Bhardwaj / International Journal of Engineering
             Research and Applications (IJERA) ISSN: 2248-9622 www.ijera.com
                          Vol. 2, Issue4, July-August 2012, pp.1459-1461

        Some Results Concerning Fixed Point In Hilbert Spaces
                  Shailesh T. Patel, Sunil Garg, Dr.Ramakant Bhardwaj
                                       The student of Singhania University
                                         Sinior Scientist,MPCST Bhopal
                    Truba Institute of Engineering & Information Technology,Bhopal(M.P.)



ABSTRACT
        In the present paper we will find some              min{
results concerning fixed point and common
                                                                                                   y  Tx
                                                                                                            2
fixed point theorems in Hilbert spaces for
                                                            x  Ty , y  Tx }  
                                                                    2               2
                                                                                                                        .........3.1.1
rational expression, which will satisfy the well                                              1  x  Tx x  Ty
known results.
                                                                             For all x,y in X where α,β,γ and δ
Key words: Common Fixed Point, Hilbert spaces              are non-negative real with
                                                                    α+β+γ+4δ<1.Then T has a unique fixed
                                                           point in X.
INTRODUCTION
         PaSndhare and Waghmode [3] proved the             Proof : Let x0єC and arbitrary we define a
following result in Hilbert space The study of             sequence {xn} as follows:
properties and application of fixed point of various
type of contractive mapping in Hilbert spaces were                         x1=Tx0, x2=Tx1= 𝑇 2 x0….xn=Txn-
obtained among others by Browder, F.E.,and                      𝑛             𝑛+1
                                                           1=𝑇 x0, xn+1=Txn=𝑇     x0
Petryshyn [1], Hicks,T.L. and Huffman,Ed.W’[2],
Huffman[3],Koparde and Waghmode[4], Smita                                   If for some n,xn+1=xn,then it
Nair and Shalu Shrivastava[5,6].In this paper we           immediately follows xn is a fixed
present a common fixed point theorem involingself                             point of T, i.e.Txn=xn
mapping.
         The study of properties and applications of                        We suppose that xn+1≠xn for
fixed point of various type of contractive mapping         every n=0,1,2…..,Then appling (3.1.1),
in also Banach spaces were obtained among others                            We have for all n≥1
by Browder, F.E.[7], Browder, F.E.,and Petryshyn,
W.V.[8].
                                                                        xn1  xn              Txn  Txn1
                                                                                          2                             2


         Theorem A Let C be a close subset of
                                                                                         a xn  Txn            
Hilbert spaceX and let T be a self                                                                          2

                 mapping on C satisfying.
                                                            xn1  Txn1   xn  xn1
                                                                                     2                          2
                                                                                                                    +


 Tx  Ty  a[ x  Tx  y  Ty ]  b x  y
          2               2            2               2



                                                                                                          xn1  Txn
                                                                                                                        2
                   For all x,yєC, x  y,0 < b, 0 <1         min{ xn  Txn1 , xn1  Txn }  
                                                                            2                  2
                                                                                                                                .........3.1.1
and 2a+b<1.                                                                                        1  xn  Txn xn  Txn1
                  Then T has a unique fixed point.
        In the present paper , we first extend
Theorem A as follows:
                                                                                         a xn  xn1           
                                                                                                            2
Theorem3.1Let C be a closed subset of Hilbert
space X and T be a mapping on
                                                            xn1  xn                xn  xn1
                                                                                2                       2
        X into it self satisfying                                                                           +



                    Tx  Ty        a x  Tx 
                              2             2



 y  Ty   x  y
              2           2




                                                                                                       1459 | P a g e
Shailesh T. Patel, Sunil Garg, Ramakant Bhardwaj / International Journal of Engineering
             Research and Applications (IJERA) ISSN: 2248-9622 www.ijera.com
                          Vol. 2, Issue4, July-August 2012, pp.1459-1461
                                                                                                           a xn1  xn 2             
                                                                                                                                   2
                                                                xn1  xn1
                                                                                 2

 min{ xn  xn , xn1  xn1 }  
                  2                          2

                                                        1  xn  xn1 xn  xn         xn  xn1   xn1  xn
                                                                                                      2                        2




                                                                                               { xn  xn1  xn1  xn 2 }
                                                                                                                      2                    2
                           a xn  xn1                     
                                                        2



 xn1  xn   xn  xn1
                 2                                  2


  xn1  xn  xn  xn1 
              2           2
                                                                                                           (     ) xn  xn1 
                                                                                                                                               2
                           
                                                                                     (   ) xn1  xn2
                                                                                                                  2


                           (     ) xn1  xn 
                                                                         2


                                                                                                  xn 2  xn1        
                                                                                                                  2
(   ) xn  xn1
                            2


                                                                                     (     )
                                                                                                  xn  xn 1
                                                                                                                      2

           (1    ) xn1  xn                                                     (1     )
                                                    2



 (     ) xn1  xn
                                         2

                                                                                                  xn 2  xn1         k 2 xn1  xn
                                                                                                                  2                        2


                                                                                                                                   (     )
            xn1  xn            
                             2

                                                                                                                          where k= (1     )
(     )
             xn1  xn
                                     2

(1     )                                                                                  Proceeding in this way, we obtain


            xn1  xn
                             2
                                  k xn1  xn
                                                                 2                                                         k n x0  x1
                                                                                              n=1,2,……..
                                   (     )
                          where k= (1     )                                                       Where α+β+γ+2η<1,
                                                                                              because k < 1
                                         →0 as n→∞
                                                                                                  xn  xn1        k n x0  x1
                                                                                                              2                        2

            xn 2  xn1              Txn1  Txn
                                 2                                   2
                                                                                              Hence for any positive integer p,

                                          a xn1  Txn1                        
                                                                             2

                                                                                      xn  xn1  xn  xn1  xn1  xn2  ......  xn p1  xn p
 xn  Txn              xn1  xn
                 2                                  2




                                                                xn  Txn1
                                                                             2        (k n  k n1  ........  k n p1 ) xn1  xn
 min{ xn1  Txn , xn  Txn1 }  
                      2                  2

                                                  1  xn1  Txn1 xn1  Txn
                                                                                                                 kn
                                                                                                                      x  xn
                                                                                                              = 1  k n 1
                                                                                                          in 0<k<1
                           a xn1  xn 2                      
                                                            2



 xn  xn1   xn1  xn
                 2                                  2
                                                                                                                          xn  xn p  0
                                                                                                          Thus                                     as
                                                                                     n
                                                                                              .

                                                            xn  xn2
                                                                         2
                                                                                              Therefore {xn} is a Cauchy sequence in
 min{ xn1  xn1 , xn  xn2 }  
                      2              2
                                                                                     C. Since C is a closed subset of a Hilbert space X
                                                 1  xn1  xn2 xn1  xn1         ,there exists an element u Є C which is the limit of
                                                                                     {xn}.


                                                                                                                              1460 | P a g e
Shailesh T. Patel, Sunil Garg, Ramakant Bhardwaj / International Journal of Engineering
               Research and Applications (IJERA) ISSN: 2248-9622 www.ijera.com
                            Vol. 2, Issue4, July-August 2012, pp.1459-1461
                lim x n                                References:
                 i.e. u = n              Now, further we have,                          1.   Browder,        F.E.,and        Petryshyn,
                                                                                               W.V.,Construction of Fixed point of non-
                                                                                               linear mapping       in    Hilbert
 u  Tu  (u  xn )  ( xn  Tu )
                 2                                                  2
                                                                                               paces.J.Math.Nal.Appl.,20,197-228(1967).
                                                                                          2.   Hicks,T.L. and Huffman,Ed.W., Fixed
                                                                                               point theorems of generalized Hilbert
 u  xn  xn  Tu                                      2 Reu  xn, xn  Tu
                      2                        2
                                                                                               spaces.    J.Math.Nal.Appl.,64,381-
                                                                                               385(1978).
                                                                                          3.   Huffman,Ed.W.,Striet convexity in locally
                                                                                               convex spaces and Fixed point theorems
         u  xn   xn1  Txn1                                                   
                                       2                                        2
                                                                                               of       generalized       Hilbert
                                                                                               spaces,Ph.D.,Thesis,Univ.of      Missouri-
 u  Tu   xn1  u
                      2
         2
                                                                                               Rolla,Missouri(1977).
                                                                                          4.   Koparde,P.V.and Waghmode,D.B.,Kanan
                                                                                               type mappings in Hilbert spaces,Scientist
                                                                   Txn1  u
                                                                                2
                                                                                               of                  Physical
 min{ xn1  Tu , u  Txn1 }  
                              2                    2

                                                           1  Txn1  xn1 xn1  Tu          sciences,3(1),45-50(1991).
                                                                                          5.   Smita Nair and Shalu Shrivastava,
                                                                                               Common Fixed point theorems in Hilbert
                       2 Reu  xn, xn  Tu                                                  space of Acta Ciencia Indica,Vol.XXXII
                                                                                               M,No.3,997(2006).
Letting n→∞, so that xn-1,xn→u, we get                                                    6.   Smita Nair and Shalu Shrivastava,
                                                                                               Common Fixed point theorems in Hilbert
 u  Tu   u  Tu                                                                             spaces of Acta Ciencia Indica,Vol. XXXII
                  2                                2
                                                                                               M,No 3,995(2006).
                                                                                          7.   Browder, F.E., Fixed point theorems for
This implies u= Tu,                            since          β<1                              non-linear Semi-contractive mapping in
If follows that u is a fixed point of T. We now show that u is unique ,                        Banach aces.Arch.Rat.Nech.Anal.,21,259-
                                                                                               269 (1965-66)
For that let v є C another common fixed point T such that               v  u , then      8.   Browder, F.E.,and Petryshyn, W.V.,The
                                                                                               Folutio by Heration of non-linear
                                                                                               functional                   equations in
 v u                 Tv  Tu
             2                             2
                                                                                               Banach
                                                                                               spaces.Bull.Amel.Math.Soc.,72,571-
                                                                                               576(1966).
        v  Tv   u  Tu
                                       2                                2


 v u
        2




                                                                 u  Tv
                                                                            2

 min{ v  Tu , u  Tv }  
                              2                2

                                                           1  v  Tv v  Tu

                                      vu
                                                       2
                 ≤        (γ +δ+ η)


                 This                                                           implies
                     v  u  (     ) v  u
                                  2                                         2




                 Since          < 1
Remark:          On taking α=β=a, γ=b, and δ=0, η=0 in theorem 1, we get
theorem A.




                                                                                                                     1461 | P a g e

More Related Content

What's hot

Random Matrix Theory and Machine Learning - Part 1
Random Matrix Theory and Machine Learning - Part 1Random Matrix Theory and Machine Learning - Part 1
Random Matrix Theory and Machine Learning - Part 1Fabian Pedregosa
 
Random Matrix Theory and Machine Learning - Part 4
Random Matrix Theory and Machine Learning - Part 4Random Matrix Theory and Machine Learning - Part 4
Random Matrix Theory and Machine Learning - Part 4Fabian Pedregosa
 
Random Matrix Theory and Machine Learning - Part 3
Random Matrix Theory and Machine Learning - Part 3Random Matrix Theory and Machine Learning - Part 3
Random Matrix Theory and Machine Learning - Part 3Fabian Pedregosa
 
Lecture on solving1
Lecture on solving1Lecture on solving1
Lecture on solving1NBER
 
Random Matrix Theory and Machine Learning - Part 2
Random Matrix Theory and Machine Learning - Part 2Random Matrix Theory and Machine Learning - Part 2
Random Matrix Theory and Machine Learning - Part 2Fabian Pedregosa
 
Nonlinear Stochastic Optimization by the Monte-Carlo Method
Nonlinear Stochastic Optimization by the Monte-Carlo MethodNonlinear Stochastic Optimization by the Monte-Carlo Method
Nonlinear Stochastic Optimization by the Monte-Carlo MethodSSA KPI
 
Systems Of Differential Equations
Systems Of Differential EquationsSystems Of Differential Equations
Systems Of Differential EquationsJDagenais
 
NIPS2010: optimization algorithms in machine learning
NIPS2010: optimization algorithms in machine learningNIPS2010: optimization algorithms in machine learning
NIPS2010: optimization algorithms in machine learningzukun
 
On estimating the integrated co volatility using
On estimating the integrated co volatility usingOn estimating the integrated co volatility using
On estimating the integrated co volatility usingkkislas
 
Senior Seminar: Systems of Differential Equations
Senior Seminar:  Systems of Differential EquationsSenior Seminar:  Systems of Differential Equations
Senior Seminar: Systems of Differential EquationsJDagenais
 
Generalization of Tensor Factorization and Applications
Generalization of Tensor Factorization and ApplicationsGeneralization of Tensor Factorization and Applications
Generalization of Tensor Factorization and ApplicationsKohei Hayashi
 
А.Н. Ширяев "Обзор современных задач об оптимальной обстановке"
А.Н. Ширяев "Обзор современных задач об оптимальной обстановке"А.Н. Ширяев "Обзор современных задач об оптимальной обстановке"
А.Н. Ширяев "Обзор современных задач об оптимальной обстановке"Yandex
 
Nonlinear perturbed difference equations
Nonlinear perturbed difference equationsNonlinear perturbed difference equations
Nonlinear perturbed difference equationsTahia ZERIZER
 
Nature-Inspired Metaheuristic Algorithms for Optimization and Computational I...
Nature-Inspired Metaheuristic Algorithms for Optimization and Computational I...Nature-Inspired Metaheuristic Algorithms for Optimization and Computational I...
Nature-Inspired Metaheuristic Algorithms for Optimization and Computational I...Xin-She Yang
 
STUDIES ON INTUTIONISTIC FUZZY INFORMATION MEASURE
STUDIES ON INTUTIONISTIC FUZZY INFORMATION MEASURESTUDIES ON INTUTIONISTIC FUZZY INFORMATION MEASURE
STUDIES ON INTUTIONISTIC FUZZY INFORMATION MEASURESurender Singh
 

What's hot (20)

Random Matrix Theory and Machine Learning - Part 1
Random Matrix Theory and Machine Learning - Part 1Random Matrix Theory and Machine Learning - Part 1
Random Matrix Theory and Machine Learning - Part 1
 
Random Matrix Theory and Machine Learning - Part 4
Random Matrix Theory and Machine Learning - Part 4Random Matrix Theory and Machine Learning - Part 4
Random Matrix Theory and Machine Learning - Part 4
 
Random Matrix Theory and Machine Learning - Part 3
Random Matrix Theory and Machine Learning - Part 3Random Matrix Theory and Machine Learning - Part 3
Random Matrix Theory and Machine Learning - Part 3
 
Lecture on solving1
Lecture on solving1Lecture on solving1
Lecture on solving1
 
Random Matrix Theory and Machine Learning - Part 2
Random Matrix Theory and Machine Learning - Part 2Random Matrix Theory and Machine Learning - Part 2
Random Matrix Theory and Machine Learning - Part 2
 
Nonlinear Stochastic Optimization by the Monte-Carlo Method
Nonlinear Stochastic Optimization by the Monte-Carlo MethodNonlinear Stochastic Optimization by the Monte-Carlo Method
Nonlinear Stochastic Optimization by the Monte-Carlo Method
 
Systems Of Differential Equations
Systems Of Differential EquationsSystems Of Differential Equations
Systems Of Differential Equations
 
NIPS2010: optimization algorithms in machine learning
NIPS2010: optimization algorithms in machine learningNIPS2010: optimization algorithms in machine learning
NIPS2010: optimization algorithms in machine learning
 
On estimating the integrated co volatility using
On estimating the integrated co volatility usingOn estimating the integrated co volatility using
On estimating the integrated co volatility using
 
Lecture 8
Lecture 8Lecture 8
Lecture 8
 
Senior Seminar: Systems of Differential Equations
Senior Seminar:  Systems of Differential EquationsSenior Seminar:  Systems of Differential Equations
Senior Seminar: Systems of Differential Equations
 
Bp31457463
Bp31457463Bp31457463
Bp31457463
 
Generalization of Tensor Factorization and Applications
Generalization of Tensor Factorization and ApplicationsGeneralization of Tensor Factorization and Applications
Generalization of Tensor Factorization and Applications
 
Midsem sol 2013
Midsem sol 2013Midsem sol 2013
Midsem sol 2013
 
YSC 2013
YSC 2013YSC 2013
YSC 2013
 
А.Н. Ширяев "Обзор современных задач об оптимальной обстановке"
А.Н. Ширяев "Обзор современных задач об оптимальной обстановке"А.Н. Ширяев "Обзор современных задач об оптимальной обстановке"
А.Н. Ширяев "Обзор современных задач об оптимальной обстановке"
 
Test
TestTest
Test
 
Nonlinear perturbed difference equations
Nonlinear perturbed difference equationsNonlinear perturbed difference equations
Nonlinear perturbed difference equations
 
Nature-Inspired Metaheuristic Algorithms for Optimization and Computational I...
Nature-Inspired Metaheuristic Algorithms for Optimization and Computational I...Nature-Inspired Metaheuristic Algorithms for Optimization and Computational I...
Nature-Inspired Metaheuristic Algorithms for Optimization and Computational I...
 
STUDIES ON INTUTIONISTIC FUZZY INFORMATION MEASURE
STUDIES ON INTUTIONISTIC FUZZY INFORMATION MEASURESTUDIES ON INTUTIONISTIC FUZZY INFORMATION MEASURE
STUDIES ON INTUTIONISTIC FUZZY INFORMATION MEASURE
 

Viewers also liked (20)

Kt2418201822
Kt2418201822Kt2418201822
Kt2418201822
 
Le2418811888
Le2418811888Le2418811888
Le2418811888
 
Kv2418301838
Kv2418301838Kv2418301838
Kv2418301838
 
Iv2415471554
Iv2415471554Iv2415471554
Iv2415471554
 
Kp2417961805
Kp2417961805Kp2417961805
Kp2417961805
 
Lt2419681970
Lt2419681970Lt2419681970
Lt2419681970
 
Ik2414801485
Ik2414801485Ik2414801485
Ik2414801485
 
Jo2416561659
Jo2416561659Jo2416561659
Jo2416561659
 
Km2417821785
Km2417821785Km2417821785
Km2417821785
 
Iz2415721576
Iz2415721576Iz2415721576
Iz2415721576
 
Kk2417701773
Kk2417701773Kk2417701773
Kk2417701773
 
Mm2420662068
Mm2420662068Mm2420662068
Mm2420662068
 
It2415351540
It2415351540It2415351540
It2415351540
 
Jk2416381644
Jk2416381644Jk2416381644
Jk2416381644
 
Mh2420342042
Mh2420342042Mh2420342042
Mh2420342042
 
Jg2416171620
Jg2416171620Jg2416171620
Jg2416171620
 
Ki2417591763
Ki2417591763Ki2417591763
Ki2417591763
 
Jz2417141717
Jz2417141717Jz2417141717
Jz2417141717
 
Kg2417521755
Kg2417521755Kg2417521755
Kg2417521755
 
TCE multa Ricardo Teobaldo
TCE multa Ricardo TeobaldoTCE multa Ricardo Teobaldo
TCE multa Ricardo Teobaldo
 

Similar to Ih2414591461

Special function of mathematical (geo )physics
Special function of mathematical (geo )physicsSpecial function of mathematical (geo )physics
Special function of mathematical (geo )physicsSpringer
 
Nonlinear Stochastic Programming by the Monte-Carlo method
Nonlinear Stochastic Programming by the Monte-Carlo methodNonlinear Stochastic Programming by the Monte-Carlo method
Nonlinear Stochastic Programming by the Monte-Carlo methodSSA KPI
 
On the Stick and Rope Problem - Draft 1
On the Stick and Rope Problem - Draft 1On the Stick and Rope Problem - Draft 1
On the Stick and Rope Problem - Draft 1Iwan Pranoto
 
Local Volatility 1
Local Volatility 1Local Volatility 1
Local Volatility 1Ilya Gikhman
 
Parameter Estimation in Stochastic Differential Equations by Continuous Optim...
Parameter Estimation in Stochastic Differential Equations by Continuous Optim...Parameter Estimation in Stochastic Differential Equations by Continuous Optim...
Parameter Estimation in Stochastic Differential Equations by Continuous Optim...SSA KPI
 
Case Study (All)
Case Study (All)Case Study (All)
Case Study (All)gudeyi
 
Exchange confirm
Exchange confirmExchange confirm
Exchange confirmNBER
 
Supplement to local voatility
Supplement to local voatilitySupplement to local voatility
Supplement to local voatilityIlya Gikhman
 

Similar to Ih2414591461 (20)

Solved problems
Solved problemsSolved problems
Solved problems
 
Gz3113501354
Gz3113501354Gz3113501354
Gz3113501354
 
Gz3113501354
Gz3113501354Gz3113501354
Gz3113501354
 
Gz3113501354
Gz3113501354Gz3113501354
Gz3113501354
 
Special function of mathematical (geo )physics
Special function of mathematical (geo )physicsSpecial function of mathematical (geo )physics
Special function of mathematical (geo )physics
 
Nonlinear Stochastic Programming by the Monte-Carlo method
Nonlinear Stochastic Programming by the Monte-Carlo methodNonlinear Stochastic Programming by the Monte-Carlo method
Nonlinear Stochastic Programming by the Monte-Carlo method
 
Chapter 3 (maths 3)
Chapter 3 (maths 3)Chapter 3 (maths 3)
Chapter 3 (maths 3)
 
Figures
FiguresFigures
Figures
 
Figures
FiguresFigures
Figures
 
1 d wave equation
1 d wave equation1 d wave equation
1 d wave equation
 
On the Stick and Rope Problem - Draft 1
On the Stick and Rope Problem - Draft 1On the Stick and Rope Problem - Draft 1
On the Stick and Rope Problem - Draft 1
 
Local Volatility 1
Local Volatility 1Local Volatility 1
Local Volatility 1
 
Hilbert
HilbertHilbert
Hilbert
 
Parameter Estimation in Stochastic Differential Equations by Continuous Optim...
Parameter Estimation in Stochastic Differential Equations by Continuous Optim...Parameter Estimation in Stochastic Differential Equations by Continuous Optim...
Parameter Estimation in Stochastic Differential Equations by Continuous Optim...
 
AJMS_384_22.pdf
AJMS_384_22.pdfAJMS_384_22.pdf
AJMS_384_22.pdf
 
Case Study (All)
Case Study (All)Case Study (All)
Case Study (All)
 
Exchange confirm
Exchange confirmExchange confirm
Exchange confirm
 
Supplement to local voatility
Supplement to local voatilitySupplement to local voatility
Supplement to local voatility
 
Demo
DemoDemo
Demo
 
Demo
DemoDemo
Demo
 

Ih2414591461

  • 1. Shailesh T. Patel, Sunil Garg, Ramakant Bhardwaj / International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA) ISSN: 2248-9622 www.ijera.com Vol. 2, Issue4, July-August 2012, pp.1459-1461 Some Results Concerning Fixed Point In Hilbert Spaces Shailesh T. Patel, Sunil Garg, Dr.Ramakant Bhardwaj The student of Singhania University Sinior Scientist,MPCST Bhopal Truba Institute of Engineering & Information Technology,Bhopal(M.P.) ABSTRACT In the present paper we will find some  min{ results concerning fixed point and common y  Tx 2 fixed point theorems in Hilbert spaces for x  Ty , y  Tx }   2 2 .........3.1.1 rational expression, which will satisfy the well 1  x  Tx x  Ty known results. For all x,y in X where α,β,γ and δ Key words: Common Fixed Point, Hilbert spaces are non-negative real with α+β+γ+4δ<1.Then T has a unique fixed point in X. INTRODUCTION PaSndhare and Waghmode [3] proved the Proof : Let x0єC and arbitrary we define a following result in Hilbert space The study of sequence {xn} as follows: properties and application of fixed point of various type of contractive mapping in Hilbert spaces were x1=Tx0, x2=Tx1= 𝑇 2 x0….xn=Txn- obtained among others by Browder, F.E.,and 𝑛 𝑛+1 1=𝑇 x0, xn+1=Txn=𝑇 x0 Petryshyn [1], Hicks,T.L. and Huffman,Ed.W’[2], Huffman[3],Koparde and Waghmode[4], Smita If for some n,xn+1=xn,then it Nair and Shalu Shrivastava[5,6].In this paper we immediately follows xn is a fixed present a common fixed point theorem involingself point of T, i.e.Txn=xn mapping. The study of properties and applications of We suppose that xn+1≠xn for fixed point of various type of contractive mapping every n=0,1,2…..,Then appling (3.1.1), in also Banach spaces were obtained among others We have for all n≥1 by Browder, F.E.[7], Browder, F.E.,and Petryshyn, W.V.[8]. xn1  xn  Txn  Txn1 2 2 Theorem A Let C be a close subset of  a xn  Txn  Hilbert spaceX and let T be a self 2 mapping on C satisfying.  xn1  Txn1   xn  xn1 2 2 + Tx  Ty  a[ x  Tx  y  Ty ]  b x  y 2 2 2 2 xn1  Txn 2 For all x,yєC, x  y,0 < b, 0 <1  min{ xn  Txn1 , xn1  Txn }   2 2 .........3.1.1 and 2a+b<1. 1  xn  Txn xn  Txn1 Then T has a unique fixed point. In the present paper , we first extend Theorem A as follows:  a xn  xn1  2 Theorem3.1Let C be a closed subset of Hilbert space X and T be a mapping on  xn1  xn   xn  xn1 2 2 X into it self satisfying + Tx  Ty  a x  Tx  2 2  y  Ty   x  y 2 2 1459 | P a g e
  • 2. Shailesh T. Patel, Sunil Garg, Ramakant Bhardwaj / International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA) ISSN: 2248-9622 www.ijera.com Vol. 2, Issue4, July-August 2012, pp.1459-1461  a xn1  xn 2  2 xn1  xn1 2  min{ xn  xn , xn1  xn1 }   2 2 1  xn  xn1 xn  xn  xn  xn1   xn1  xn 2 2 { xn  xn1  xn1  xn 2 } 2 2  a xn  xn1  2  xn1  xn   xn  xn1 2 2   xn1  xn  xn  xn1  2 2  (     ) xn  xn1  2   (   ) xn1  xn2 2  (     ) xn1  xn  2 xn 2  xn1  2 (   ) xn  xn1 2 (     ) xn  xn 1 2 (1    ) xn1  xn (1     ) 2  (     ) xn1  xn 2 xn 2  xn1  k 2 xn1  xn 2 2 (     ) xn1  xn  2 where k= (1     ) (     ) xn1  xn 2 (1     ) Proceeding in this way, we obtain xn1  xn 2  k xn1  xn 2  k n x0  x1 n=1,2,…….. (     ) where k= (1     ) Where α+β+γ+2η<1, because k < 1 →0 as n→∞ xn  xn1  k n x0  x1 2 2 xn 2  xn1  Txn1  Txn 2 2 Hence for any positive integer p,  a xn1  Txn1  2 xn  xn1  xn  xn1  xn1  xn2  ......  xn p1  xn p  xn  Txn   xn1  xn 2 2 xn  Txn1 2  (k n  k n1  ........  k n p1 ) xn1  xn  min{ xn1  Txn , xn  Txn1 }   2 2 1  xn1  Txn1 xn1  Txn kn x  xn = 1  k n 1 in 0<k<1  a xn1  xn 2  2  xn  xn1   xn1  xn 2 2 xn  xn p  0 Thus as n . xn  xn2 2 Therefore {xn} is a Cauchy sequence in  min{ xn1  xn1 , xn  xn2 }   2 2 C. Since C is a closed subset of a Hilbert space X 1  xn1  xn2 xn1  xn1 ,there exists an element u Є C which is the limit of {xn}. 1460 | P a g e
  • 3. Shailesh T. Patel, Sunil Garg, Ramakant Bhardwaj / International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA) ISSN: 2248-9622 www.ijera.com Vol. 2, Issue4, July-August 2012, pp.1459-1461 lim x n References: i.e. u = n Now, further we have, 1. Browder, F.E.,and Petryshyn, W.V.,Construction of Fixed point of non- linear mapping in Hilbert u  Tu  (u  xn )  ( xn  Tu ) 2 2 paces.J.Math.Nal.Appl.,20,197-228(1967). 2. Hicks,T.L. and Huffman,Ed.W., Fixed point theorems of generalized Hilbert  u  xn  xn  Tu  2 Reu  xn, xn  Tu 2 2 spaces. J.Math.Nal.Appl.,64,381- 385(1978). 3. Huffman,Ed.W.,Striet convexity in locally convex spaces and Fixed point theorems  u  xn   xn1  Txn1  2 2 of generalized Hilbert spaces,Ph.D.,Thesis,Univ.of Missouri-  u  Tu   xn1  u 2 2 Rolla,Missouri(1977). 4. Koparde,P.V.and Waghmode,D.B.,Kanan type mappings in Hilbert spaces,Scientist Txn1  u 2 of Physical  min{ xn1  Tu , u  Txn1 }   2 2 1  Txn1  xn1 xn1  Tu sciences,3(1),45-50(1991). 5. Smita Nair and Shalu Shrivastava, Common Fixed point theorems in Hilbert  2 Reu  xn, xn  Tu space of Acta Ciencia Indica,Vol.XXXII M,No.3,997(2006). Letting n→∞, so that xn-1,xn→u, we get 6. Smita Nair and Shalu Shrivastava, Common Fixed point theorems in Hilbert u  Tu   u  Tu spaces of Acta Ciencia Indica,Vol. XXXII 2 2 M,No 3,995(2006). 7. Browder, F.E., Fixed point theorems for This implies u= Tu, since β<1 non-linear Semi-contractive mapping in If follows that u is a fixed point of T. We now show that u is unique , Banach aces.Arch.Rat.Nech.Anal.,21,259- 269 (1965-66) For that let v є C another common fixed point T such that v  u , then 8. Browder, F.E.,and Petryshyn, W.V.,The Folutio by Heration of non-linear functional equations in v u  Tv  Tu 2 2 Banach spaces.Bull.Amel.Math.Soc.,72,571- 576(1966).   v  Tv   u  Tu 2 2  v u 2 u  Tv 2  min{ v  Tu , u  Tv }   2 2 1  v  Tv v  Tu vu 2 ≤ (γ +δ+ η) This implies v  u  (     ) v  u 2 2 Since     < 1 Remark: On taking α=β=a, γ=b, and δ=0, η=0 in theorem 1, we get theorem A. 1461 | P a g e