Option 2: The SMART System
Submit a paper that examines the SMART system for setting goals. Be sure to consider the following:
1. Assess the challenges in establishing quality and risk management goals in complex organizations.
2. Infer the linkages between improvement goal statements and actions to achieve desired results.
3. Evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of different types of goal statements.
Your paper should be well-written and meet the following requirements:
· 4-5 pages in length (excluding title and reference pages)
· Formatted according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements.
· Include at least six references from the peer-reviewed articles. The CSU-Global Library is a good place to find peer-reviewed articles.
Option 2: The SMART System
Submit a paper that examines the SMART system for setting goals. Be sure to consider the following:
1.
Assess the challenges in establishing quality and risk management goals in complex organizations.
2.
Infer the linkages between improvement goal statements and actions to achieve desired results.
3.
Evaluate the advantages and
disadvantages of different types of goal statements.
Your paper should be well
-
written and meet the following requirements:
·
4
-
5 pages in length (excluding title and reference pages)
·
Formatted according to the
CSU
-
Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements
.
·
Include at least six references from the peer
-
reviewed articles. The CSU
-
Global Library is a good
place to
find peer
-
reviewed articles.
Option 2: The SMART System
Submit a paper that examines the SMART system for setting goals. Be sure to consider the following:
1. Assess the challenges in establishing quality and risk management goals in complex organizations.
2. Infer the linkages between improvement goal statements and actions to achieve desired results.
3. Evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of different types of goal statements.
Your paper should be well-written and meet the following requirements:
4-5 pages in length (excluding title and reference pages)
Formatted according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements.
Include at least six references from the peer-reviewed articles. The CSU-Global Library is a good
place to find peer-reviewed articles.
HCM370
Critical Thinking Rubric – Module 5
Meets Expectation Approaches
Expectation
Below Expectation Limited Evidence
Content, Research, and Analysis
9-10 Points 7-8 Points 5-6 Points 3-4 Points
Requirements The paper includes
all of the required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
The paper includes
most of the
required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
The paper includes
some of the
required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
The paper includes
few of the required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
13-15 Points 10-12 Points 7-9 Points 4-6 Points
Content Demonstrates
strong or adequa.
Option 2 The SMART SystemSubmit a paper that examines the SMART.docx
1. Option 2: The SMART System
Submit a paper that examines the SMART system for setting
goals. Be sure to consider the following:
1. Assess the challenges in establishing quality and risk
management goals in complex organizations.
2. Infer the linkages between improvement goal statements and
actions to achieve desired results.
3. Evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of different types
of goal statements.
Your paper should be well-written and meet the following
requirements:
· 4-5 pages in length (excluding title and reference pages)
· Formatted according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and
APA Requirements.
· Include at least six references from the peer-reviewed articles.
The CSU-Global Library is a good place to find peer-reviewed
articles.
Option 2: The SMART System
Submit a paper that examines the SMART system for setting
goals. Be sure to consider the following:
1.
Assess the challenges in establishing quality and risk
management goals in complex organizations.
2.
Infer the linkages between improvement goal statements and
actions to achieve desired results.
2. 3.
Evaluate the advantages and
disadvantages of different types of goal statements.
Your paper should be well
-
written and meet the following requirements:
·
4
-
5 pages in length (excluding title and reference pages)
·
Formatted according to the
CSU
-
Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements
.
·
Include at least six references from the peer
-
reviewed articles. The CSU
-
Global Library is a good
place to
find peer
-
reviewed articles.
3. Option 2: The SMART System
Submit a paper that examines the SMART system for setting
goals. Be sure to consider the following:
1. Assess the challenges in establishing quality and risk
management goals in complex organizations.
2. Infer the linkages between improvement goal statements and
actions to achieve desired results.
3. Evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of different types
of goal statements.
Your paper should be well-written and meet the following
requirements:
-5 pages in length (excluding title and reference pages)
-Global Guide to Writing and
APA Requirements.
-reviewed
articles. The CSU-Global Library is a good
place to find peer-reviewed articles.
HCM370
Critical Thinking Rubric – Module 5
Meets Expectation Approaches
Expectation
Below Expectation Limited Evidence
Content, Research, and Analysis
9-10 Points 7-8 Points 5-6 Points 3-4 Points
4. Requirements The paper includes
all of the required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
The paper includes
most of the
required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
The paper includes
some of the
required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
The paper includes
few of the required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
13-15 Points 10-12 Points 7-9 Points 4-6 Points
Content Demonstrates
strong or adequate
knowledge of the
materials;
correctly
represents
knowledge from
the readings and
5. sources.
Some significant
but not major
errors or omissions
in demonstration
of knowledge.
Major errors or
omissions in
demonstration of
knowledge.
Fails to
demonstrate
knowledge of the
materials.
17-20 Points 13-16 Points 9-12 Points 5-8 Points
Critical Analysis Provides a strong
critical analysis
and interpretation
of the information
given.
Some significant
but not major
errors or omissions
in analysis and
interpretation.
Major errors or
omissions in
analysis and
interpretation.
6. Fails to provide
critical analysis and
interpretation of
the information
given.
13-15 Points 10-12 Points 7-9 Points 4-6 Points
Application of
Source Material
Sources well or
adequately chosen
to provide
substance and
perspectives on
the issue;
knowledge from
the course linked
properly to source
material.
Some significant
but not major
problems with
selection and
linkage of sources.
Major problems
with selection and
linkage of sources.
Source selection is
seriously flawed;
no linkage to
7. knowledge from
the course.
9-10 Points 7-8 Points 5-6 Points 3-4 Points
Sources Cites and
integrates at least
3 credible sources
as specified in
description.
Cites and
integrates 2
credible sources as
specified in
description.
Cites and
integrates 1
credible source as
specified in
description.
Cites and
integrates no
credible sources.
Mechanics and Writing
9-10 Points 7-8 Points 5-6 Points 3-4 Points
Demonstrates
college-level
Project is clearly
organized, well
8. Project is fairly well
organized and
Project is poorly
organized; does
Project is not
organized or well
HCM370
Critical Thinking Rubric – Module 5
proficiency in
organization,
grammar, and
style.
written, and in
proper format as
outlined in the
assignment. Strong
sentence and
paragraph
structure; few
errors in grammar,
spelling, or APA
style.
written, and is in
proper format as
outlined in the
assignment.
9. Reasonably good
sentence and
paragraph
structure;
significant number
of errors in
grammar, spelling,
or APA style.
not follow proper
paper format.
Inconsistent to
inadequate
sentence and
paragraph
development;
numerous errors in
grammar, spelling,
or APA style.
written, and is not
in proper paper
format. Poor
quality work;
unacceptable in
terms of grammar,
spelling, and/or
APA style.
9-10 Points 7-8 Points 5-6 Points 3-4 Points
Demonstrates
proper use of
APA style
Project contains
10. proper APA
formatting,
according to the
CSU-Global Guide
to Writing and APA
Requirements,
with no more than
one significant
error.
Few errors in APA
formatting,
according to the
CSU-Global Guide
to Writing and APA
Requirements, with
no more than two
to three significant
errors.
Significant errors in
APA formatting,
according to the
CSU-Global Guide
to Writing and APA
Requirements, with
four to five
significant errors.
Numerous errors in
APA formatting,
according to the
CSU-Global Guide
to Writing and APA
Requirements, with
more than five