1 2Organization and StyleCriterionUnsatisfact.docx

•Download as DOCX, PDF•

0 likes•2 views

1 2 Organization and Style Criterion Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Major points are stated clearly, are supported by specific details, examples or analysis, and are organized logically Little organization for major points. Examples are not given, details are not provided, or analysis is missing. Paper is well-organized. Most points are well-supported with details and examples. Introduction provides sufficient background on the topic and previews major points No introduction, or no clear preview of major points, or no background along with major points. Provides background and previews major points well. The conclusion is logical, flows from the body of the paper, and reviews major points. No conclusion or conclusion introduces new materials instead of summarizing what has been presented. Conclusion summarizes major points and makes clear recommendations or takes a position. Paper meets assignment guidelines for length Assignment is considerably shorter or longer than required. Exceed max of 10% directly quoted material. Assignment is within guidelines. Paragraph transitions are present and logical and maintain the flow throughout the paper. Paper does not flow clearly, or is disorganized. Overuse of bullets or lists. Most paragraph transitions are well done. Section and subsection headings help define the flow. Tone is appropriate to the content and assignment. Uses inappropriate voice or presents information from a biased viewpoint. Does not distinguish between facts and opinions. Uses appropriate “voice” for the assignment, and presents information in a factual and professional manner. Sentences are complete, clear and concise. Frequent use of sentence fragments, run-on sentences, or awkward phrasing. No sentence fragments or run-on sentences. Sentences are well-constructed with consistently strong, varied sentences. Uses passive voice frequently, tends to have simple sentences and phrases. Good use of active voice, with well-written, interesting sentences. Sentence transitions are present and maintain the flow of thought. Sentences frequently unconnected with rough transitions. Over use of bulleted lists. Sentences flow well. Mechanics (APA, Spelling & Grammar) Criterion Unsatisfactory Satisfactory The paper, including the title page, reference page, tables and appendices follow APA guidelines for format Nothing follows APA format. References are missing information. Margins, title page, reference pages, etc. all follow APA format. Citations of original works within the body of the paper follow APA guidelines Incorrect or missing citations. Block quotes are not handled correctly. Required information is not all present. Text citations are correct. Block quotes are properly indented and formatted. All information is present. Paper is written in MS Word Paper is not compatible with MS Word Paper is compatible with MS Word and submitted in Word Format The paper is laid out with effective use of headings, font styles, and whit ...

Education

Paper does not flow clearly, or is disorganized.
Overuse of bullets or lists.
Most paragraph transitions are well done. Section and
subsection headings help define the flow.
Tone is appropriate to the content and assignment.
Uses inappropriate voice or presents information from a biased
viewpoint. Does not distinguish between facts and opinions.
Uses appropriate “voice” for the assignment, and presents
information in a factual and professional manner.
Sentences are complete, clear and concise.
Frequent use of sentence fragments, run-on sentences, or
awkward phrasing.
No sentence fragments or run-on sentences.
Sentences are well-constructed with consistently strong, varied
sentences.
Uses passive voice frequently, tends to have simple sentences
and phrases.
Good use of active voice, with well-written, interesting
sentences.
Sentence transitions are present and maintain the flow of
thought.
Sentences frequently unconnected with rough transitions.
Over use of bulleted lists.
Sentences flow well.
Mechanics (APA, Spelling & Grammar)
Criterion
Unsatisfactory
Satisfactory
The paper, including the title page, reference page, tables and
appendices follow APA guidelines for format
Nothing follows APA format. References are missing
information.
Margins, title page, reference pages, etc. all follow APA format.

Citations of original works within the body of the paper follow
APA guidelines
Incorrect or missing citations. Block quotes are not handled
correctly. Required information is not all present.
Text citations are correct. Block quotes are properly indented
and formatted. All information is present.
Paper is written in MS Word
Paper is not compatible with MS Word
Paper is compatible with MS Word and submitted in Word
Format
The paper is laid out with effective use of headings, font styles,
and white space.
No headings or headings not in APA format.
Inconsistant font styles or colors.
Headings, properly formatted, and fonts are appropriate to the
assignment.
Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed.
Frequent errors.
Uses first or second person in writing.
Paper is generally error-free.
Paper is written in academic style and in third person.
Spelling is correct.
Frequent spelling errors or misuse of homonyms, etc.
Spelling is generally error-free.

Similar to 1 2Organization and StyleCriterionUnsatisfact.docx

Collaborate Summary RubricCollaborate Summary RubricCriteria0 Points - Unacceptable1 Point - Needs Improvement2 Points - Satisfactory3 Points - ExemplaryContent of SummaryDid not provide summarySummary provided less than acceptable evidence that session recording was watched in its entirety. Summary provided satisfactory evidence that session recording was watched in its entirety. Summary proved the student watched and paid attention to the entire session recording. PresentationDid not provide summarySummary not presented in essay form (e.g. bullet lists)Summary provided in essay form, but did not meet 2 page, double spaced, in 11 or 12 point font requirement, or summary was not submitted through Blackboard or not composed in Microsoft Word.Summary met 2 page, double spaced, in 11 or 12 point font requirement. Submitted through the assignment link and composed in Microsoft Word.Clarity & MechanicsDid not provide summary Summary presented in an unorganized or somewhat unorganized manner, with some clarity and/or grammatical or spelling errors.Summary presented in an organized manner with minor clarity and grammatical or spelling errors.Summary presented in a clear, concise manner and formatted in an easy to read style with no grammatical or spelling errors. Total # of Possible Points: 9 Discussion Board RubricDiscussion Board RubricCriteria0 Points - Unacceptable1 Point - Needs Improvement2 Points - Satisfactory3 Points - ExcellentInitial Posting Timing & Relevance Zero posts or does not meet instructor timeline and requirements.Superficial thought. Adressed limited aspects relevant to the prompt and does not demonstrate understaning of key concepts. Met partial elements of instructor timeline and requirementsThoughts were well developed and addressed basic aspects relevant to the prompt and demonstrated base knowledge of concepts. Mostly met instructor timeline and requirements.Thoughts were well developed and fully addressed all aspects relevant to the prompt. Demonstrated excellent integration of key comcepts. Met or exceeded instructor timeline and requirements.Reply Postings Timeline & RelevanceZero replies, or replies not relevant to discussion topicsReplies were limited in relevance or did not enrich discussion (e.g. agrees or disagrees) or met partial elements of instructor timeline and requirements.Elaborated on posts with further comment or observation, relevant to topic. Mostly met instructor timeline and requirements.Demonstrated analysis of others' posts, included meaningful comments. Offered thoughtful insight. Met or exceeded instructor timeline and requirements.Clarity & Mechanics & ReferenceZero posts, or posted unorganized content that may contain multiple grammatical or spelling errors or may be inappropriate. Did not meet instructor requirements for references and citations.Communicated in a somewhat unorganized manner, with some errors in clarity and/or grammatical or spelling errors. Partically met instructor requ ...

Collaborate Summary RubricCollaborate Summary RubricCriteria0 Poin.docx

mccormicknadine86

hello, I need a report of 7 pages about the turbines. You can define basically what turbines is , you also can exaplain how it works. you can explain how useful it is.after you write the 7 pages, you should add some images in the report. if you are not comfortable writting about Turbines, you can write about the transmission and I have a sample report on that. the report should have that: Abstract Introduction System design Subsystem design Modeling and analysis Performance, predictions, prototype experiment Risk assessment Summary, recommendations and lessons learned Appendices. this is the rubric. Sample Technical Report Rubric Criteria Distinguished Proficient Basic Unacceptable Abstract Proper length, clear, concise summary of material that includes key details. Proper length and clarity, provides a clear summary of the material to follow. Word limit not exceeded, communicates some details but may be unclear. May not fall under word limit. Fails to communicate the important details. Introduction The relevance and importance of the report is made clear. Intended audience is clear from the content; organization of the report is conveyed in a readable manner. Some relevance and importance is conveyed, but this may be slightly unclear, or lacking in insight or originality Report organization is conveyed but in a somewhat rote manner. Relevance may be unclear due to vague terms. Not insightful or original Provides little on the report organization. Little or no reference to the topic or its relevance; audience unclear. Content (System Design) Robust content containing clear, referenced description of data acquisition methods, data sets and their analysis. Equations are clearly presented and necessary Results significant and (including discussion of uncertainty) insightful and referenced substantiated discussion. All elements of report content are present, but some are less developed. Equations are clearly presented and necessary Some aspects of the data and analysis may be less clear Some discussion is engaging some is not. All elements of report content are present, but one or more are poorly-developed. Some equations are either missing or not necessary; formatting has minor inconsistencies. Data, analysis, and results sections are reasonably complete but presented in less than insightful manner. One or more of the key report elements is/are missing. Data are incompletely presented and analytical techniques are unclear. Discussion is non-engaging and straightforward. Organization Ideas, methods, data and results are presented logically. Paragraphs have solid topic sentences. Transitions link paragraphs and sections. It is easy to follow the line reasoning. Subheadings are used throughout the paper allowing the reader to reader moves easily through the text. The ideas are arranged logically to support the central purpose. Transitions usually link paragraphs. For the most part, the reader can follow the line of reasoning. Subheadi.

hello, I need a report of 7 pages about the turbines. You can de.docx

CristieHolcomb793

Research Paper Grading Rubric Name: Course: Date: (The Psychology Department at San José State University is acknowledged for the basic structure of this form.) CATEGORY Unacceptable (Below Standards) Acceptable (Meets Standards) Good (Occasionally Exceeds) Excellent (Exceeds Standards) SCORE Introduction Does not adequately convey topic. Does not describe subtopics to be reviewed. Lacks adequate theses statement. Conveys topic, but not key question(s). Describes subtopics to be reviewed. General theses statement. Conveys topic and key question(s). Clearly delineates subtopics to be reviewed. General thesis statement. Strong introduction of topic’s key question(s), terms. Clearly delineates subtopics to be reviewed. Specific thesis statement. 5 points Focus & Sequencing Little evidence material is logically organized into topic, subtopics or related to topic. Many transitions are unclear or nonexistent. Most material clearly related to subtopic, main topic. Material may not be organized within subtopics. Attempts to provide variety of transitions All material clearly related to subtopic, main topic and logically organized within subtopics. Clear, varied transitions linking subtopics, and main topic. All material clearly related to subtopic, main topic. Strong organization and integration of material within subtopics. Strong transitions linking subtopics, and main topic. 15 points Support Few sources supporting thesis. Sources insignificant or unsubstantiated. Sources generally acceptable but not peer-reviewed research (evidence) based. Sources well selected to support thesis with some research in support of thesis. Strong peer- reviewed research based support for thesis. 15 points Conclusion Does not summarize evidence with respect to thesis statement. Does not discuss the impact of researched material on topic. Review of key conclusions. Some integration with thesis statement. Discusses impact of researched material on topic. Strong review of key conclusions. Strong integration with thesis statement. Discusses impact of researched material on topic. Strong review of key conclusions. Strong integration with thesis statement. Insightful discussion of impact of the researched material on topic. 5 points Grammar & Mechanics Grammatical errors or spelling & punctuation substantially detract from the paper. Very few grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors interfere with reading the paper. Grammatical errors or spelling & punctuation are rare and do not detract from the paper. The paper is free of grammatical errors and spelling & punctuation. 20 points APA Style & Communication Errors in APA style detract substantially from the paper. Word choice is informal in tone. Writing is choppy, with many awkward or unclear passages. .

Research Paper Grading Rubric Name Course Date.docx

eleanorg1

Term Paper: Each student should write a term paper on any topic in the general area of Supply Chain Management, or Operations Management. The research must include at least 3 original sources as references in the report. Internet sources are not acceptable as one of the three references, but may be added in addition to the three required sources. You may use any of the widely accepted citation format such as APA (American Psychology Association) format. The length of the paper should be about 5 pages, double spaced. The focus of the paper must be on original contribution on the part of the writer. You must refer to at least 3 sources (not counting the text book being used) and provide the references in the body of the text using the APA format. The term paper is due no later than Apr 28, 2016. Term Paper Evaluation: Term papers will be evaluated primarily based on the following criteria: 1. Format (no typos, no grammatical errors, good overall structure – includes table of contents, body of paper as described in term paper section, references, appendix – Appendix may include data charts or graph or any other relevant material to the topic); 2. Content (richness, it delivers a well-balanced and clearly yet concisely stated message, the use of graphs to illustrate data or ideas, etc.); 3. Originality (the entire paper must be a true expression of your own thoughts and perspective rather than copying and patching together a bunch of clauses or sentences from various resources). It’s absolutely required that you give credit to the sources of your references; 4. Relevance to and compliance to the requirements of the paper as stated in the Term Paper segment. Written Assignments Rubric A Paper (Exemplary): 1. Complies fully with the assignment. Information clearly and effectively supports a central purpose or thesis and displays a thoughtful, in-depth analysis of a sufficiently limited topic. The reader gains insights. 2. Is directed towards and meets the needs of a defined audience (is persuasive or argumentative). 3. Begins, flows, and ends effectively. The introduction, body and conclusion of the paper are sound. 4. Provides compelling supporting arguments, evidence, examples and details. The use of supporting detail is embedded in a context of discussion. 5. Is well-organized and unified with ideas and sentences that relate to the main topic. The ideas are arranged logically to support the thesis. 6. Uses appropriate, direct language: the writing is compelling; the sentences are well-phrased and varied in length and structure. Paragraphs are well-structured, use of headings is excellent, and the paper shows strong organization. 7. Correctly acknowledges and documents sources in APA style (e.g., in-text citations, works cited pages, etc.). 8. Is free of errors in grammar, punctuation, word choice, spelling, and format. 9. Maintains a level of excellence throughout, and shows originality and creativity in realizing 1- ...

Term Paper Each student should write a term paper on any topic in.docx

mehek4

Rubric For The Evaluation Of “Modern Challenges” Paper CRITERIA NEEDS IMPROVEMENT Minimum Points SATISFACTORY Medium Points EXCEPTIONAL Maximum Points CONTENT (9 Points) Choose one of the three major religions discussed in this course. Write a 1,050- to 1,400-word paper that addresses the following questions: · In what ways do the common characteristics of the three religions, including their ethics, contribute to their challenges in the modern world? · How is this religion responding to challenges in the modern world? · What has changed about the roles of women in the religion over time? The writer does not demonstrate cursory understanding of subject matter, and the purpose of the paper is not stated. The objective, therefore, is not addressed and supporting materials are not correctly referenced. 0 to 5 points The writer demonstrates limited understanding of the subject matter in that theories are not well connected to a practical experience or appropriate examples, though the attempt to research the topic is evident, and materials are correctly referenced. 5.1 to 7.6 points The writer demonstrates an understanding of the subject matter by clearly stating the objective of the paper and links theories to practical experience. The paper includes relevant material that is correctly referenced, and this material fulfills the objective of the paper. 7.7 to 10 points Comments on Content ? of 10 points You have fulfilled all/most/some/none of the objectives of the assignment with this ____ word paper. You had a section on… ORGANIZATION ( 3 Points) Paragraphs do not focus around a central point, and concepts are disjointedly introduced or poorly defended (i.e., stream of consciousness). The writer struggles with limited vocabulary and has difficulty conveying meaning such that only the broadest, most general messages are presented. There is no introduction or conclusion. 0 to .8 points Topics/content could be organized in a more logical manner. Transitions from one idea to the next are often disconnected and uneven. The introduction does not give clear direction and the conclusion does not communicate what was learned. Some words, transitional phrases, and conjunctions are overused. Ideas may be overstated, and sentences with limited contribution to the subject are included. .9 to 1.7 points The writer focuses on ideas and concepts within paragraphs, and sentences are well-connected and meaningful. Each topic logically follows the objective. The introduction clearly states the objective or ideas leading to the purpose of the paper, and a conclusion draws the ideas together. The reading audience is correctly identified, demonstrated by appropriate language usage (i.e., avoiding jargon and simplifying complex concepts appropriately). Writing is concise, in active voice, and avoids awkward transitions and overuse of conjunctions. 1.8 to 2.5 points Comments on Organization ? of 2.5 points You do/do not have a clear organizationa ...

Rubric For The Evaluation Of Modern Challenges” PaperCRITERIA.docx

SUBHI7

PSYC 221 Article Critique Grading Rubric Student: _______________________________ 5 4 3 2 1 0 Structure and Organization Clear introduction and strong subject evidence; clear and appropriate transitions; appropriate paragraphing; logical, strong conclusion rising from content. Critique includes three outside sources to support evaluation. Generally clear introduction and focused; generally clear and appropriate transitions; mostly appropriate paragraphing; adequate conclusion – relates to content but lacks objectivity or is vague. Critique includes two outside sources to support evaluation. Adequate introduction; unclear; adequate transitions; reader can follow what is being said, but the paper’s overall organization is choppy; adequate paragraphs; conclusion is simplistic. Critique includes one outside source to support evaluation. Weak introduction; weak transitions; main points can be ascertained, but difficult to follow what is being said; weak and long paragraphing; conclusion repeats introduction. Critique does not include outside sources to support evaluation. Weak introduction and does not draw reader’s interest; little or no transitions; organization is disjointed and haphazard; paragraphs are weak; lacks conclusion. Critique is missing. No assignment was turned in. Content Assignment parameters (length, subject, objectives) are observed; focus is clear and coherent (good sense of audience); obvious understanding of subject; orderly development; assertions are clearly supported and/or illustrated Assignment parameters (length, subject, objectives) are observed; focus is generally clear and coherent (general sense of audience); good understanding of subject; adequate development; orderly, but stiff, choppy progression of evidence Assignment parameters (length, subject, objectives) not clearly observed; mostly focused (some sense of audience); thoughts randomly organized and presented; assertions weakly supported and/or illustrated Inadequate or minimal observance of assignment length, subject and objectives; weakly focused (little sense of audience); unclear progression of ideas; assertions weakly supported and/or illustrated Inadequate length; objectives of assignment not met; unfocused; little or no sense of audience; serious and persistent errors in organization and structure; lacks understanding of subject; disorganized; does not prove point, if one can be discerned No assignment was turned in. Grammar and Mechanics Sentence fluency coherent, unified, varied; sentence structure complete; correct spelling, punctuation, capitalization; varied diction, word choices Sentence fluency correct, varied; Minor errors in structure (fragments, run-ons); correct spelling, punctuation, capitalization; limited diction, word choices Relatively few errors in sentence fluency; multiple fragments/run-ons, poor spelling, punctuation, and capitalization; limited diction, uses trite words, slang, and contractions Significant errors ...

PSYC 221Article Critique Grading RubricStudent ________.docx

amrit47

Final Project HR Plan: Week 8 DUE: Wednesday July 27, 2017 BEFORE 11:55 PM CST Assignment Instructions: Guidelines for HR Plan Overview: You have acquired a vast knowledge about multiple topics relevant to managers and HR employees. You will apply your learning by presenting an overall HR plan for an organization that you have chosen to work on throughout the course (fictitious or real). This is your opportunity to demonstrate your ability to consider and recommend actions to management on how the organization can be most competitive in the global environment by utilizing the organizations best asset; its human resources. Development of the Plan You will come up with a fictitious organization or you can use a real organization that is familiar throughout the course. The end product is a paper that presents a comprehensive HR plan for the organization that includes the concepts that you have learned from the text and outside resources. Parameters for the organization: You are free to describe the organization with which you will be associated. You will need to provide some level of detail of your organization. Use your general knowledge, coursework, and research to accomplish this. ⦁ Even though you are required to provide general organizational details, your primary function is human resources. Analyze based on this premise. ⦁ Assume that a core group of managers and employees (approximately 250) are already in place.. ⦁ Your organization can produce a product or perform a service. ⦁ Requirements for the Overview of the organization Description of what the organization does and organizational structure. Be specific. You may include an organizational chart. ⦁ How does the organization operate? How are tasks/work projects accomplished? ⦁ Is the organization domestic or international? Locations? ⦁ Who are the competitors? ⦁ What are the factors that you believe are critical to success in this organization? ⦁ What is the culture like? ⦁ How is information communicated? ⦁ Why would people want to work for this organization? HR Topics that MUST be addressed in the paper ⦁ Recruitment and Selection: Include the job description and interview questions . A discussion and analysis of why and how you developed these tools must be included in the paper. Best practices based on the research and your text should be discussed. ⦁ Compensation and Benefits: Include the compensation package for each position. A discussion and analysis of why and how you developed these tools must be included in the paper. Best practices based on the research and your text should be discussed. ⦁ Performance Management: Include a performance appraisal and management system.A discussion and analysis of why and how you developed these tools must be included in the paper. Best practices based on the research and your text should be discussed. ⦁ Training Program: Include a training program overview. A discussion and analysis of why and how you devel ...

Final Project HR Plan Week 8DUE Wednesday July 27, 2017 BE.docx

RAJU852744

PSYC 221 Book Report Grading Rubric Student: _______________________________ 20 17.8 15.8 13.8 11.8 0 Structure and Organization Clear introduction and strong subject evidence; clear and appropriate transitions; appropriate paragraphing; logical, strong conclusion rising from content. Generally clear introduction and focused; generally clear and appropriate transitions; mostly appropriate paragraphing; adequate conclusion – relates to content but lacks objectivity or is vague. Adequate introduction; unclear; adequate transitions; reader can follow what is being said, but the paper’s overall organization is choppy; adequate paragraphs; conclusion is simplistic. Weak introduction; weak transitions; main points can be ascertained, but difficult to follow what is being said; weak and long paragraphing; conclusion repeats introduction . Weak introduction and does not draw reader’s interest; little or no transitions; organization is disjointed and haphazard; paragraphs are weak; lacks conclusion. No assignment was turned in. Content Assignment parameters (length 6–7 pages, subject, objectives) are observed; focus is clear and coherent (good sense of audience); obvious understanding of subject; orderly development; conclusion/reflection are clearly supported and/or illustrated Assignment parameters (length 4–5 pages, subject, objectives) are observed; focus is generally clear and coherent (general sense of audience); good understanding of subject; adequate development; orderly, but stiff, choppy progression of evidence Assignment parameters (length 2–3 pages, subject, objectives) not clearly observed; mostly focused (some sense of audience); thoughts randomly organized and presented; conclusions/reflection weakly supported and/or illustrated Inadequate or minimal observance of assignment length, subject and objectives; weakly focused (little sense of audience); unclear progression of ideas; conclusions/reflection weakly supported and/or illustrated Inadequate length; objectives of assignment not met; unfocused; little or no sense of audience; serious and persistent errors in organization and structure; lacks understanding of subject; disorganized; does not prove point, if one can be discerned No assignment was turned in. Grammar and Mechanics Sentence fluency coherent, unified, varied; sentence structure complete; correct spelling, punctuation, capitalization; varied diction, word choices Sentence fluency correct, varied; Minor errors in structure (fragments, run-ons); correct spelling, punctuation, capitalization; limited diction, word choices Relatively few errors in sentence fluency; multiple fragments/run-ons, poor spelling, punctuation, and capitalization; limited diction, uses trite words, slang, and contractions Significant errors in sentence fluency and structure, spelling, punctuation and capitalization; diction weak or inappropriate Serious and persistent errors in: sentence fluency, sentence structure, spelling, ...

PSYC 221Book Report Grading RubricStudent _____________.docx

amrit47

Masters Level Grading Rubric For Assessment of Report 1-4 Scale Weight Student Score 1 2 3 4 Percentage Score 0 to 59 59-68 69-71 72-75 76-79 80-84 85-89 90-100 Grades F C B- B B+ A- A A+ Mastery Level Beginning Developing Competent Mastery Standard Level Below Standard Approaching Standard At Standard Exceeds Standard Subject Matter 50 Problem, Background Problem statement is poorly crafted or missing or is misstated Problem statement is not well-crafted but is acceptable Problem statement is reasonably well-crafted and is specific to the issue Problem statement is well-crafted, specific and represents a novel outlook on the issue Discussion of Findings Discussion is incorrect correct, missing many of the pros with little or no discussion of negatives Discussion is inadequately correct, missing some of the pros and most or all of the cons Discussion is correct, taking into account most of the pros and cons and represents a solid level of research Discussion is complete and correct, taking into account pros and cons and represents a full level of research with novel conclusions Managerial Recommendation Recommendations are not supported and demonstrat little or no understanding of problem or the consequences of implementation Recommendations are inadequately supported and do not represent reasonable understanding of problem or the consequences of implementation, with alternate solution available Recommendations are adequately supported and represents reasonable understanding of problem, some of the consequences of implementation and may have and alternate solution available Recommendations are fully supported and represents superior understanding of problem, consequences of implementation and has alternate solutions available Professionalism Student unable or nearly unable to work independently and did not successfully meet project deadlines needing constant feedback/help, unresponsive to written/verbal feedback Student had problems working independently and had problems successfully meeting project deadlines needing significant feedback/help, not fully responsive to written/verbal feedback Student worked mostly independently and met most project deadlines needing some feedback/help, mostly responsive to written/verbal feedback Student worked independently and met all project deadlines striking an exceptional balance between working independently but asking for necessary feedback/help while exceptionally responsive to written/verbal feedback References References are not appropriate to the subject matter or are missing References are not fully appropriate to the subject matter References are timely and appropriate to the subject matter References represent a complete literature survey are timely and appropriate to the subject matter Tables/Charts Tables, charts and other media poorly support the presentation of the material of the report or are not present when they would be of value Tables, charts and o ...

Masters Level Grading Rubric For Assessment of Report1-4 Scal

AbramMartino96

Masters Level Grading Rubric For Assessment of Report1-4 Scal

AbramMartino96

Term Paper Rubric – 50 point maximum Traits10 points8 po.docx

mehek4

Assignment RubricUnit 6 assignment grading rubric. Instructors: Enter total available points in cell H2, and values between 0 and 4 in the yellow cells in the Score column. Total available points =100Content RubricIntroductoryEmergentPracticedProficient/MasteredScoreWeightFinal Score0 - 1.92 - 2.93 - 3.94Content QualitySubmission does not address most of the assignment requirements and/or indicates no understanding of critical concepts.Includes some of the assignment requirements. Opinions and ideas may indicate misconceptions or little understanding of some critical concepts.Includes all assignment requirements with minor errors/omissions, supports opinions and ideas creatively, clearly, and correctly. Displays understanding of most critical concepts.Includes all assignment requirements, supports opinions and ideas creatively, clearly, and correctly with details and examples where appropriate. Displays complete understanding of critical concepts.90%0.00ResourcesDoes not include any resources (0) or sources utilized are not relevant and credible sources of information(1).Not all sources utilized are relevant and/or credible and/or does not meet the required number of sources.Supports many opinions and ideas with relevant and credible sources of information; meets the required number and types of resources.Supports opinions and ideas with relevant and credible sources of information; meets or exceeds the required number and types of resources.10%0.00Content Score0Writing Deduction RubricIntroductoryEmergentPracticedProficient/MasteredScoreWeightFinal Score0-1234Grammar & PunctuationThe overall meaning of the paper is difficult to understand. Sentence structure, subject verb agreement errors, missing prepositions, and missing punctuation make finding meaning difficult.Several confusing sentences or 1 to 2 confusing paragraphs make understanding parts of the paper difficult, but the overall paper meaning is clear. Many subject verb agreement errors, run-on sentences, etc. cause confusion.A few confusing sentences make it difficult to understand a small portion of the paper. However, the overall meaning of a paragraph and the paper are intact. There may be a few subject verb agreement errors or some missing punctuation.There are one or two confusing sentences, but the overall sentence and paragraph meanings are clear. There are a few minor punctuation errors such as comma splices or run-on sentences.435%1.40SpellingThe many misspelled words and incorrect words choices significantly interfere with the readability.Many typos, misspelled words, or the use of incorrect words making understanding difficult in a few places.Some misspelled words or the misuse of words such as confusing then/than. However, intent is still clear.A few misspelled words normally caught by spellcheckers are present but do not significantly interfere with the overall readability of the paper.435%1.40Order of Ideas & Length RequirementPaper has some good information ...

Assignment RubricUnit 6 assignment grading rubric. Instructors En.docx

ssuser562afc1

Rubric For The Evaluation Of “History of Judaism” Paper CRITERIA NEEDS IMPROVEMENT Minimum Points SATISFACTORY Medium Points EXCEPTIONAL Maximum Points CONTENT (6 Points) Write a 700- to 1,050-word paper that includes the following: · A summary of the life and importance of one key person in Jewish history · An explanation of one key event in the history of Judaism that is connected to that person · A description of any rituals, symbols, or sacred texts in Judaism associated with this event or person · An example of how this person's story helped to develop the ideas of Jewish ethics Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines. The writer does not demonstrate cursory understanding of subject matter, and the purpose of the paper is not stated. The objective, therefore, is not addressed and supporting materials are not correctly referenced. 0 to 2.4 points The writer demonstrates limited understanding of the subject matter in that theories are not well connected to a practical experience or appropriate examples, though the attempt to research the topic is evident, and materials are correctly referenced. 2.5 to 5.4 points The writer demonstrates an understanding of the subject matter by clearly stating the objective of the paper and links theories to practical experience. The paper includes relevant material that is correctly referenced, and this material fulfills the objective of the paper. 5.5 to 7 points Comments on Content ? of 7 points You have fulfilled all/most/some of the objectives of the assignment with this ___ word paper about _____________. You had a section on … ORGANIZATION ( 2 Points) Paragraphs do not focus around a central point, and concepts are disjointedly introduced or poorly defended (i.e., stream of consciousness). The writer struggles with limited vocabulary and has difficulty conveying meaning such that only the broadest, most general messages are presented. There is no introduction or conclusion. 0 to .5 points Topics/content could be organized in a more logical manner. Transitions from one idea to the next are often disconnected and uneven. The introduction does not give clear direction and the conclusion does not communicate what was learned. Some words, transitional phrases, and conjunctions are overused. Ideas may be overstated, and sentences with limited contribution to the subject are included. .6 to 1 points The writer focuses on ideas and concepts within paragraphs, and sentences are well-connected and meaningful. Each topic logically follows the objective. The introduction clearly states the objective or ideas leading to the purpose of the paper, and a conclusion draws the ideas together. The reading audience is correctly identified, demonstrated by appropriate language usage (i.e., avoiding jargon and simplifying complex concepts appropriately). Writing is concise, in active voice, and avoids awkward transitions and overuse of conjunctions. 1.1 to 1.5 points Comments on Organization ...

Rubric For The Evaluation Of History of Judaism” PaperCRITERIA.docx

SUBHI7

Number of pages: 12 Deadline: 42 Hours Instructions: This assignment includes several different sections and number of pages for each. I've given specific details in the attachment All instructions/details/guidelines, as outlined and given in the other document, must be followed and adhered to Paper written must meet all the requirements and parts given/outlined in the other document Choose a grade level and social studies topic with supporting standards and plan a lesson to present in the classroom. Include grade-level appropriate activities that encourage active student engagement. Address the following in your lesson plan: 1. Multiple intelligences 2. Authentic literature 3. Depth of Knowledge 4. Assessment of objective- Use three formative assessments during the lesson and one summative assessment at the end. Teach your social studies lesson to a classroom of students. In an essay of 1,000-1,250-words, reflect on the lesson and content. Cite at least four references from educational journals and academic websites to support your teaching strategies. 1 Unsatisfactory 0.00% 2 Less Than Satisfactory 65.00% 3 Satisfactory 75.00% 4 Good 85.00% 5 Excellent 100.00% 70.0 %Content 25.0 %Lesson Plan The lesson plan is missing many of the required components. The activities are missing, weak, or incomplete. Activities and assessments are not grade appropriate. The lesson plan consists of most of the required components. Attention to detail is minimal, underdeveloped, or inappropriate for teaching. Activities and assessments are mostly grade appropriate. The lesson plan consists of all the required components. Activities and assessments are appropriate for grade level and encourage participation. All lesson plan components are addressed. The thinking skills and activities are thoughtfully developed and provide meaningful practice with familiar text. The activities are fun, interactive, and creative. All lesson components are addressed. Exceptionally organized activities that create multiple and meaningful opportunities to practice. Activities are engaging. 45.0 %Reflection Essay Content is incomplete and omits most of the requirements stated in the assignment’s criteria. Major points are irrelevant to the assignment. No outside sources were used to support major points. Content is incomplete or omits some requirements stated in the assignment’s criteria. Major points are not clear and/or persuasive. No outside sources were used to support major points. Content addresses most of the issues stated in the assignment’s criteria. Major points are addressed. Research is evident. Content is comprehensive, accurate, and definitions are clearly stated. Major points are stated clearly and are supported. Research is adequate, up-to-date, relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment’s criteria. At least two relevant academic sources were cited. Content is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive; definitions are clearly stated..

Number of pages 12 Deadline 42 HoursInstructions This ass.docx

hopeaustin33688

Graduate Writing RubricPUS AssignmentRubricGraduate WritingEXE.docx

shericehewat

Rubric.docx

logen3

Rubrics research paper and presentation rubric for the final p

ssusere73ce3

Similar to 1 2Organization and StyleCriterionUnsatisfact.docx (17)