hello,  I need a report of 7 pages about the turbines. You can define basically what turbines  is , you also can exaplain how it works. you can explain how useful it is.after you write the 7 pages, you should add some images in the report. if you are not comfortable writting about Turbines, you can write about the transmission and I have a sample report on that. the report should have that: Abstract Introduction System design Subsystem design Modeling and analysis Performance, predictions, prototype experiment Risk assessment Summary, recommendations and lessons learned Appendices. this is the rubric. Sample Technical Report Rubric Criteria Distinguished Proficient Basic Unacceptable Abstract Proper length, clear, concise summary of material that includes key details. Proper length and clarity, provides a clear summary of the material to follow. Word limit not exceeded, communicates some details but may be unclear. May not fall under word limit. Fails to communicate the important details.  Introduction The relevance and importance of the report is made clear. Intended audience is clear from the content; organization of the report is conveyed in a readable manner. Some relevance and importance is conveyed, but this may be slightly unclear, or lacking in insight or originality Report organization is conveyed but in a somewhat rote manner. Relevance may be unclear due to vague terms. Not insightful or original Provides little on the report organization. Little or no reference to the topic or its relevance; audience unclear. Content (System Design) Robust content containing clear, referenced description of data acquisition methods, data sets and their analysis. Equations are clearly presented and necessary Results significant and (including discussion of uncertainty) insightful and referenced substantiated discussion. All elements of report content are present, but some are less developed. Equations are clearly presented and necessary Some aspects of the data and analysis may be less clear Some discussion is engaging some is not. All elements of report content are present, but one or more are poorly-developed. Some equations are either missing or not necessary; formatting has minor inconsistencies. Data, analysis, and results sections are reasonably complete but presented in less than insightful manner. One or more of the key report elements is/are missing.  Data are incompletely presented and analytical techniques are unclear. Discussion is non-engaging and straightforward. Organization Ideas, methods, data and results are presented logically. Paragraphs have solid topic sentences. Transitions link paragraphs and sections.  It is easy to follow the line reasoning. Subheadings are used throughout the paper allowing the reader to reader moves easily through the text.  The ideas are arranged logically to support the central purpose. Transitions usually link paragraphs. For the most part, the reader can follow the line of reasoning. Subheadi.

1. hello,
I need a report of 7 pages about the turbines. You can define
basically what turbines is , you also can exaplain how it works.
you can explain how useful it is.after you write the 7 pages, you
should add some images in the report.
if you are not comfortable writting about Turbines, you can
write about the transmission and I have a sample report on that.
the report should have that:
Abstract
Introduction
System design
Subsystem design
Modeling and analysis
Performance, predictions, prototype experiment
Risk assessment
Summary, recommendations and lessons learned
Appendices.
this is the rubric.
Sample Technical Report Rubric
Criteria
Distinguished
Proficient
Basic
Unacceptable
Abstract
Proper length, clear, concise summary of material that includes
key details.
Proper length and clarity, provides a clear summary of the

2. material to follow.
Word limit not exceeded, communicates some details but may
be unclear.
May not fall under word limit. Fails to communicate the
important details.
Introduction
The relevance and importance of the report is made clear.
Intended audience is clear from the content; organization of the
report is conveyed in a readable manner.
Some relevance and importance is conveyed, but this may be
slightly unclear, or lacking in insight or originality
Report organization is conveyed but in a somewhat rote manner.
Relevance may be unclear due to vague terms.
Not insightful or original
Provides little on the report organization.
Little or no reference to the topic or its relevance; audience
unclear.
Content
(System Design)
Robust content containing clear, referenced description of data
acquisition methods, data sets and their analysis.
Equations are clearly presented and necessary
Results significant and (including discussion of uncertainty)
insightful and referenced substantiated discussion.
All elements of report content are present, but some are less
developed.
Equations are clearly presented and necessary
Some aspects of the data and analysis may be less clear
Some discussion is engaging some is not.
All elements of report content are present, but one or more are
poorly-developed.
Some equations are either missing or not necessary; formatting
has minor inconsistencies.
Data, analysis, and results sections are reasonably complete but
presented in less than insightful manner.

3. One or more of the key report elements is/are missing.
Data are incompletely presented and analytical techniques are
unclear.
Discussion is non-engaging and straightforward.
Organization
Ideas, methods, data and results are presented logically.
Paragraphs have solid topic sentences.
Transitions link paragraphs and sections. It is easy to follow
the line reasoning.
Subheadings are used throughout the paper allowing the reader
to reader moves easily through the text.
The ideas are arranged logically to support the central purpose.
Transitions usually link paragraphs.
For the most part, the reader can follow the line of reasoning.
Subheadings are used throughout the paper to guide the reader
without undue confusion.
In general, ideas are arranged logically, but sometimes ideas
fail to make sense together.
The reader is fairly clear about what writer intends.
While subheadings are used, the content beneath them does not
follow.
Many paragraphs without topic sentences.
Ideas are not logically organized.
Frequently, ideas fail to make sense together. The reader cannot
identify a line of reasoning.
Subheadings not used. Few or no topic sentences.
Tone for an engineering report
Consistently professional and appropriate.
Generally professional and appropriate, with occasional lapses.
Some professional or appropriate aspects but generally
unprofessional.
Not professional or appropriate.
Sentence

4. Structure
Sentences are well-phrased and varied in length and type.
They flow smoothly from one to another with no run on
sentences or comma splices.
Sentences are correct with minor variety in length and structure.
The flow from sentence to sentence is generally smooth
although some run on sentences are present.
Some sentences are awkwardly constructed so that the reader is
occasionally distracted.
Multiple run-on sentences are present Sentence structure is
monotonous.
Errors in sentence structure are frequent enough to be a major
distraction to the reader.
Run on sentences and fragments are common.
Word Choice
Word choice is consistently precise and accurate.
The writer uses the active voice as much as possible.
Word choice is generally good, with occasional lapses to the
passive voice.
Unnecessary words are occasionally used.
Word choice is merely adequate, and the range of words is
limited.
Some words are used Inappropriately or unnecessarily.
Many words are used inappropriately, confusing the reader.
It is difficult for the reader to understand what the writer is
trying to express.
Grammar,
Spelling,
Writing
Mechanics
The writing is nearly error-free.

5. There are occasional errors, but no major distraction or obscure
meaning.
Several grammatical errors, to the point that
reader is distracted by them.
Pattern of ungrammatical writing, with sufficient
errors that meaning is obscured.
Conclusion
The writer makes succinct and precise conclusions based on the
review of literature.
Suggestions for future work offered.
Some of the conclusions, however, are not supported.
Suggestions for future work offered.
Some of the conclusions, however, are not supported
Weak or trite suggestions for future work.
There is little or no indication that the writer tried to synthesize
the information or draw conclusions based on the literature
No suggestions for future work.
Reference Quality
In-depth research demonstrated.
References are primarily peer reviewed professional journals or
other approved sources such as agency reports and textbooks.
Several relevant secondary sources, revealing adequate research
.
Although most of the references are professionally legitimate, a
few are questionable (e.g., trade books, internet sources,
popular magazines)
.
D
isplays minimal effort in selecting quality sources.
Many of the references are from sources that are not peer

6. reviewed.
Several relevant secondary sources.
Some facts not referenced.
There are virtually no sources that are professionally reliable.
Over-reliance on tertiary sources; spotty documentation of facts
in text.
Citation Format
Approved format is used correctly and consistently in the paper
and on the reference section.
Approved format is used with minor errors. Some formatting
problems exists.
There are multiple errors formatting, and one or more missing
citations or references in the bibliography which are not cited in
the text.
Format of the document is unrecognizable as an approved
format, and numerous missing references or errors
.