FYS Grading Rubric for Writing Assignment A 95 B .docx
•Download as DOCX, PDF•
0 likes•2 views
This rubric outlines the grading criteria for a writing assignment on a scale of A to F. It evaluates papers based on their focus and main idea, organization at the overall and paragraph level, content, research and citation, sentence structure and details, grammar and mechanics. An A paper will have a clear purpose and main idea, well-planned organization with smooth transitions, exceptionally well-presented content supported by specific evidence, well-integrated research cited according to APA style, varied sentence patterns, specific examples and details, and excellent grammar. A C paper will have some awareness of purpose, vague main idea, weak organization, underdeveloped content with generalized evidence, sources that support some claims but are not well integrated, and patterns
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
Writing Assignment RubricA (15)B (13)C (11)DF (8)Scor.docx
Writing Assignment Rubric
A (15)
B (13)
C (11)
D/F (8)
Score
Focus:
Purpose
Purpose is clear
Shows awareness of purpose
Shows limited awareness of purpose
No awareness
Main idea
Clearly presents the main idea and supports it throughout the paper.
There is a main idea supported throughout most of the paper.
The vague sense of the main idea weakly supported throughout the paper.
No main idea
Organization: Overall
Well-planned and well thought out. Includes title, introduction, statement of main idea, transitions and conclusion.
Good overall organization includes the main organizational tools.
There is a sense of organization, although some of the organizational tools are used weakly or missing
No sense of organization
Content
Exceptionally well-presented and argued; ideas are detailed, well developed, supported with specific evidence &
facts, as well as examples and specific details.
Well-presented and argued; ideas are detailed, developed and supported with evidence and details, mostly specific.
Content is sound and solid; ideas are present but not particularly developed or supported; some evidence, but usually of a generalized nature.
Content is not sound
Research (if assignment includes a research component)
Sources are exceptionally well-integrated, and they support claims argued in the paper very effectively. Quotations and Works Cited conform to APA style sheet.
Sources are well integrated and support the paper’s claims. There may be occasional errors, but the sources and Works Cited conform to APA style sheet.
Sources support some claims made in the paper but might not be integrated well within the paper’s argument. There may be a few errors in APA style.
The paper does not use adequate research or if it does, the sources are not integrated well. They are not cited correctly according to APA style, nor listed correctly on the Works
Cited page.
Grammar &
Mechanics
Excellent grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation.
A few errors in grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation, but not many.
Shows a pattern of errors in spelling, grammar, syntax and/or punctuation. It could also be a sign of a lack of proof-reading.
Continuous errors
APA
Guidelines
Uses APA guidelines accurately and consistently to cite sources and formatting
Uses APA
guidelines with minor violations to cite sources and formatting
Reflects incomplete knowledge of APA guidelines
It does not use APA guidelines.
Total
APA Reference
Research Question
Type of Study
Research Design
Sample, Sample Size, and How Selected
Instruments Used, Reliability and Validity, Data Collection Methods
Results (including statistical analysis
Consistent with other Literature)
Limitations
...
1 2Organization and StyleCriterionUnsatisfact.docx
1
2
Organization and Style
Criterion
Unsatisfactory
Satisfactory
Major points are stated clearly, are supported by specific details, examples or analysis, and are organized logically
Little organization for major points. Examples are not given, details are not provided, or analysis is missing.
Paper is well-organized. Most points are well-supported with details and examples.
Introduction provides sufficient background on the topic and previews major points
No introduction, or no clear preview of major points, or no background along with major points.
Provides background and previews major points well.
The conclusion is logical, flows from the body of the paper, and reviews major points.
No conclusion or conclusion introduces new materials instead of summarizing what has been presented.
Conclusion summarizes major points and makes clear recommendations or takes a position.
Paper meets assignment guidelines for length
Assignment is considerably shorter or longer than required.
Exceed max of 10% directly quoted material.
Assignment is within guidelines.
Paragraph transitions are present and logical and maintain the flow throughout the paper.
Paper does not flow clearly, or is disorganized.
Overuse of bullets or lists.
Most paragraph transitions are well done. Section and subsection headings help define the flow.
Tone is appropriate to the content and assignment.
Uses inappropriate voice or presents information from a biased viewpoint. Does not distinguish between facts and opinions.
Uses appropriate “voice” for the assignment, and presents information in a factual and professional manner.
Sentences are complete, clear and concise.
Frequent use of sentence fragments, run-on sentences, or awkward phrasing.
No sentence fragments or run-on sentences.
Sentences are well-constructed with consistently strong, varied sentences.
Uses passive voice frequently, tends to have simple sentences and phrases.
Good use of active voice, with well-written, interesting sentences.
Sentence transitions are present and maintain the flow of thought.
Sentences frequently unconnected with rough transitions.
Over use of bulleted lists.
Sentences flow well.
Mechanics (APA, Spelling & Grammar)
Criterion
Unsatisfactory
Satisfactory
The paper, including the title page, reference page, tables and appendices follow APA guidelines for format
Nothing follows APA format. References are missing information.
Margins, title page, reference pages, etc. all follow APA format.
Citations of original works within the body of the paper follow APA guidelines
Incorrect or missing citations. Block quotes are not handled correctly. Required information is not all present.
Text citations are correct. Block quotes are properly indented and formatted. All information is present.
Paper is written in MS Word
Paper is not compatible with MS Word
Paper is compatible with MS Word and submitted in Word Format
The paper is laid out with effective use of headings, font styles, and whit ...
ENG-106 Rubric Definition Argument Criteria Value1 Unsati
ENG-106 Rubric: Definition Argument
Criteria
% Value
1: Unsatisfactory
2: Less Than Satisfactory
3: Satisfactory
4: Good
5: Excellent
% Scaling
0%
65%
75%
85%
100%
Content & Ideas – 40%
Definition Argument Content and Ideas Should:
Include an effective title.
Provide a thesis that centers specifically on an argument of definition.
Establish clear criteria related to the definition in question.
Match one or more cases to the established criteria.
Use evidence appropriate for definitional arguments.
40%
Does not have title, and has missing or indiscernible thesis statement and minimal evidence to support main ideas. Argument includes elements of reasoning by definition, but does not center on a definition argument. Student does not use outside sources.
Title may not suggest subject and does not spark interest. Thesis statement and/or the controlling idea are not clearly stated. Argument includes elements of a definitional argument, but does not use strategies (especially the criteria-match structure) very well. Ideas are underdeveloped and clichéd. They do not support the thesis. Evidence from outside sources can be irrelevant.
Title suggests subject but does not spark interest. Thesis statement identifies the main point the author is trying to make. Most of content relates to thesis statement, but lacks sufficient support through appropriate strategies. Argument centers specifically on a definitional argument, but may not effectively uses strategies that support it, including matching criteria for definition arguments Cited evidence sometimes does not justify ideas.
Title suggests subject but does not necessarily spark interest. Thesis statement clearly identifies the main point the author is trying to make. Argument centers specifically on a definitional argument and uses strategies that support it, including matching criteria for definition arguments. Most of the content supports thesis, and cited evidence usually justifies ideas.
Title suggests subject and sparks interest. With a clear, controlling idea, thesis statement effectively identifies the main point the student is trying to make. Content supports thesis well. Argument centers specifically on a definitional argument and effectively uses strategies that support it, including matching criteria for definition arguments Specific, cited evidence justifies ideas and enriches the essay.
Organization – 12%
Organization
12%
No apparent organization present. Ineffective introduction does not invite readers or explain the subject. The reader cannot find the thesis statement. Underdeveloped paragraphs lack focus and topic sentences. No conclusion present.
No apparent organization present. Introduction explains subject, but does not engage readers. Thesis is difficult to find. Underdeveloped paragraphs lack focus and topic sentences. Weak conclusion offered.
Organization is clear, but with minor errors. Introduction explains subject, but does not adequately engage readers. Thesis may be m ...
Top of FormBenchmark Assignment - Analysis of a Theoretical Fram.docx
Top of Form
Benchmark Assignment - Analysis of a Theoretical Framework for Leadership
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
74.00%
3
Satisfactory
79.00%
4
Good
87.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
20.0 %Selection of Book About a Leader Who Chose Leadership as a Vocation
Does not select a book about a leader or provide an explanation as to why that person chose leadership as a vocation.
Selection of a book about a leader as well as explanation of why that person chose leadership as a vocation is incomplete or insufficient. Evidence to justify conclusions is vague or irrelevant. Subject knowledge is unclear or inconsistent.
Presents an elemental selection of a book about a leader as well as explanation of why that person chose leadership as a vocation. Some subject knowledge is evident.
Presents a selection of a book about a leader as well as explanation of why that person chose leadership as a vocation. Detailed examples and evidence are included. Subject knowledge is competent.
Presents a thorough and fully-developed selection of a book about a leader as well as explanation of why that person chose leadership as a vocation. Offers detailed evidence that justifies conclusions about the selection and explanation. Includes relevant examples and applicable insight. Demonstrates comprehensive subject knowledge and understanding.
25.0 %Theoretical Framework, Style, and Leadership Traits present in the Work 2.1: Analyze theories of leadership and motivation in order to inspire followership.
Does not examine the theoretical framework, style, and leadership traits that present in the selected work as well as how the individual has adopted leadership as their vocation.
Examination of the theoretical framework, style, and leadership traits that present in the selected work as well as how the individual has adopted leadership as their vocation is incomplete or insufficient. Evidence to justify conclusions is vague and/or irrelevant. Subject knowledge is unclear and/or inconsistent.
Presents an elemental examination of the theoretical framework, style, and leadership traits that present in the selected work as well as how the individual has adopted leadership as their vocation. Some subject knowledge is evident.
Presents an examination of the theoretical framework, style, and leadership traits that present in the selected work as well as how the individual has adopted leadership as their vocation. Detailed examples and evidence are included. Subject knowledge is competent.
Presents a thorough and fully-developed examination of the theoretical framework, style, and leadership traits that present in the selected work as well as how the individual has adopted leadership as their vocation. Offers detailed evidence that justifies conclusions about the examination. Includes relevant examples and applicable insight. Demonstrates comprehensive subject knowledge and understanding.
25.0 %Qualities and Shortcomings of the Selected Leader
Does not ...
1Unsatisfactory0.002Less Than Satisfactory65.003Sa.docx
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less Than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
75.0 %Content
20.0 %Legal and Ethical Implications: Reflection Regarding Students
Does not reflect on the information from specific articles.
Reflects on the information from specific articles, but reflection lacks depth of insight.
Reflection indicates legal and ethical implications for classroom management as it relates to students.
Implications are adequately described and an opinion is expressed.
Implications are described clearly with anecdotes.
20.0 %Legal and Ethical Implications: Reflection Regarding Parents
Does not reflect on the information from specific articles.
Reflects on the information from specific articles, but reflection lacks depth of insight.
Reflection indicates legal and ethical implications for classroom management as it relates to parents.
Implications are adequately described and an opinion is expressed.
Implications are described clearly with anecdotes.
15.0 %Legal and Ethical Implications: Reflection Regarding Teachers
Does not reflect on the information from specific articles.
Reflects on the information from specific articles, but reflection lacks depth of insight.
Reflection indicates legal and ethical implications for classroom management as it relates to teachers.
Implications are adequately described and an opinion is expressed.
Implications are described clearly with anecdotes.
20.0 %Informing Personal Classroom Management System
Does not include ways in which this informs a personal classroom management system.
Analysis of the implications of legal and ethical issues regarding the rights of students, teachers and parents for classroom management is sketchy and lacks depth of insight.
Essay contains an analysis of how legal and ethical issues regarding the rights of students, teachers and parents inform a personal classroom management system.
Analysis is clear and concisely presented.
Analysis draws specific conclusions about how these implications affect the student's personal classroom management system.
15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
5.0 %Argument Logic and Construction
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is in part or wholly incoherent.
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic.
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose.
Argument is strong, showing logical progressions. Firm control of the technique of argumentation is evident. Smooth progression of claims
The argument presents a clear, convincing and persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner.
5.0 %Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.)
Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction,.
ENG-106 Rubric Proposal EssayCriteria Value1 Unsatisfacto.docx
ENG-106 Rubric: Proposal Essay
Criteria
% Value
1: Unsatisfactory
2: Less Than Satisfactory
3: Satisfactory
4: Good
5: Excellent
% Scaling
0%
65%
75%
85%
100%
Content & Ideas – 40%
Proposal
Content and Ideas Should:
Include an effective title.
Use a thesis that centers on a proposal argument.
Give a problem presence.
Develop the proposal argument by using claim-type strategies that support proposals (categorical, ethical, and/or cause and effect claims).
Present specific evidence to supplement supporting arguments.
40%
Does not have title, and has missing or indiscernible thesis statement and minimal evidence to support main ideas. The writer gives the problem no presence. Argument includes elements of a proposal, but the argument does not center on the proposal. The writer does not use strategies that support proposal arguments.
Title may not suggest subject and does not spark interest. Thesis statement and/or the controlling idea are not clearly stated. The writer gives the problem little presence. Argument includes elements of proposals, but the argument does not center on a proposal and/or the writer does not use strategies that support proposal arguments very well. Ideas are underdeveloped and clichéd. They do not support the thesis. Evidence from outside sources can be irrelevant.
Title suggests subject but does not spark interest. Thesis statement identifies the main point the author is trying to make. The writer gives the problem some presence, though the problem could be explained more forcefully. Most of content relates to thesis statement, but lacks sufficient support through appropriate strategies for making proposal arguments (categorical, ethical, and/or cause and effect claims). Argument may not center specifically on a proposal. Cited evidence sometimes does not justify ideas.
Title suggests subject but does not necessarily spark interest. Thesis statement clearly identifies the main point the author is trying to make. The writer gives the problem presence. Argument centers specifically on a proposal and uses strategies that support it (categorical, ethical, and/or cause and effect claims). Most of the content supports thesis, and cited evidence usually justifies ideas.
Title suggests subject and sparks interest. With a clear, controlling idea, thesis statement effectively identifies the main proposal the student is trying to make. The student gives the problem full presence. Content supports thesis well by effectively using strategies that support proposals as necessary (categorical, ethical, and/or cause and effect claims). Specific, cited evidence justifies ideas and enriches the essay.
Organization – 12%
Organization
12%
No apparent organization present. The piece does not explain that a problem exists, provide a solution, and/or justify the solution. Ineffective introduction does not invite readers or explain the subject. The reader cannot find the thesis statement. Underdeveloped paragraphs lack focus and topic sent ...
Recommended
Writing Assignment RubricA (15)B (13)C (11)DF (8)Scor.docx
Writing Assignment Rubric
A (15)
B (13)
C (11)
D/F (8)
Score
Focus:
Purpose
Purpose is clear
Shows awareness of purpose
Shows limited awareness of purpose
No awareness
Main idea
Clearly presents the main idea and supports it throughout the paper.
There is a main idea supported throughout most of the paper.
The vague sense of the main idea weakly supported throughout the paper.
No main idea
Organization: Overall
Well-planned and well thought out. Includes title, introduction, statement of main idea, transitions and conclusion.
Good overall organization includes the main organizational tools.
There is a sense of organization, although some of the organizational tools are used weakly or missing
No sense of organization
Content
Exceptionally well-presented and argued; ideas are detailed, well developed, supported with specific evidence &
facts, as well as examples and specific details.
Well-presented and argued; ideas are detailed, developed and supported with evidence and details, mostly specific.
Content is sound and solid; ideas are present but not particularly developed or supported; some evidence, but usually of a generalized nature.
Content is not sound
Research (if assignment includes a research component)
Sources are exceptionally well-integrated, and they support claims argued in the paper very effectively. Quotations and Works Cited conform to APA style sheet.
Sources are well integrated and support the paper’s claims. There may be occasional errors, but the sources and Works Cited conform to APA style sheet.
Sources support some claims made in the paper but might not be integrated well within the paper’s argument. There may be a few errors in APA style.
The paper does not use adequate research or if it does, the sources are not integrated well. They are not cited correctly according to APA style, nor listed correctly on the Works
Cited page.
Grammar &
Mechanics
Excellent grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation.
A few errors in grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation, but not many.
Shows a pattern of errors in spelling, grammar, syntax and/or punctuation. It could also be a sign of a lack of proof-reading.
Continuous errors
APA
Guidelines
Uses APA guidelines accurately and consistently to cite sources and formatting
Uses APA
guidelines with minor violations to cite sources and formatting
Reflects incomplete knowledge of APA guidelines
It does not use APA guidelines.
Total
APA Reference
Research Question
Type of Study
Research Design
Sample, Sample Size, and How Selected
Instruments Used, Reliability and Validity, Data Collection Methods
Results (including statistical analysis
Consistent with other Literature)
Limitations
...
1 2Organization and StyleCriterionUnsatisfact.docx
1
2
Organization and Style
Criterion
Unsatisfactory
Satisfactory
Major points are stated clearly, are supported by specific details, examples or analysis, and are organized logically
Little organization for major points. Examples are not given, details are not provided, or analysis is missing.
Paper is well-organized. Most points are well-supported with details and examples.
Introduction provides sufficient background on the topic and previews major points
No introduction, or no clear preview of major points, or no background along with major points.
Provides background and previews major points well.
The conclusion is logical, flows from the body of the paper, and reviews major points.
No conclusion or conclusion introduces new materials instead of summarizing what has been presented.
Conclusion summarizes major points and makes clear recommendations or takes a position.
Paper meets assignment guidelines for length
Assignment is considerably shorter or longer than required.
Exceed max of 10% directly quoted material.
Assignment is within guidelines.
Paragraph transitions are present and logical and maintain the flow throughout the paper.
Paper does not flow clearly, or is disorganized.
Overuse of bullets or lists.
Most paragraph transitions are well done. Section and subsection headings help define the flow.
Tone is appropriate to the content and assignment.
Uses inappropriate voice or presents information from a biased viewpoint. Does not distinguish between facts and opinions.
Uses appropriate “voice” for the assignment, and presents information in a factual and professional manner.
Sentences are complete, clear and concise.
Frequent use of sentence fragments, run-on sentences, or awkward phrasing.
No sentence fragments or run-on sentences.
Sentences are well-constructed with consistently strong, varied sentences.
Uses passive voice frequently, tends to have simple sentences and phrases.
Good use of active voice, with well-written, interesting sentences.
Sentence transitions are present and maintain the flow of thought.
Sentences frequently unconnected with rough transitions.
Over use of bulleted lists.
Sentences flow well.
Mechanics (APA, Spelling & Grammar)
Criterion
Unsatisfactory
Satisfactory
The paper, including the title page, reference page, tables and appendices follow APA guidelines for format
Nothing follows APA format. References are missing information.
Margins, title page, reference pages, etc. all follow APA format.
Citations of original works within the body of the paper follow APA guidelines
Incorrect or missing citations. Block quotes are not handled correctly. Required information is not all present.
Text citations are correct. Block quotes are properly indented and formatted. All information is present.
Paper is written in MS Word
Paper is not compatible with MS Word
Paper is compatible with MS Word and submitted in Word Format
The paper is laid out with effective use of headings, font styles, and whit ...
ENG-106 Rubric Definition Argument Criteria Value1 Unsati
ENG-106 Rubric: Definition Argument
Criteria
% Value
1: Unsatisfactory
2: Less Than Satisfactory
3: Satisfactory
4: Good
5: Excellent
% Scaling
0%
65%
75%
85%
100%
Content & Ideas – 40%
Definition Argument Content and Ideas Should:
Include an effective title.
Provide a thesis that centers specifically on an argument of definition.
Establish clear criteria related to the definition in question.
Match one or more cases to the established criteria.
Use evidence appropriate for definitional arguments.
40%
Does not have title, and has missing or indiscernible thesis statement and minimal evidence to support main ideas. Argument includes elements of reasoning by definition, but does not center on a definition argument. Student does not use outside sources.
Title may not suggest subject and does not spark interest. Thesis statement and/or the controlling idea are not clearly stated. Argument includes elements of a definitional argument, but does not use strategies (especially the criteria-match structure) very well. Ideas are underdeveloped and clichéd. They do not support the thesis. Evidence from outside sources can be irrelevant.
Title suggests subject but does not spark interest. Thesis statement identifies the main point the author is trying to make. Most of content relates to thesis statement, but lacks sufficient support through appropriate strategies. Argument centers specifically on a definitional argument, but may not effectively uses strategies that support it, including matching criteria for definition arguments Cited evidence sometimes does not justify ideas.
Title suggests subject but does not necessarily spark interest. Thesis statement clearly identifies the main point the author is trying to make. Argument centers specifically on a definitional argument and uses strategies that support it, including matching criteria for definition arguments. Most of the content supports thesis, and cited evidence usually justifies ideas.
Title suggests subject and sparks interest. With a clear, controlling idea, thesis statement effectively identifies the main point the student is trying to make. Content supports thesis well. Argument centers specifically on a definitional argument and effectively uses strategies that support it, including matching criteria for definition arguments Specific, cited evidence justifies ideas and enriches the essay.
Organization – 12%
Organization
12%
No apparent organization present. Ineffective introduction does not invite readers or explain the subject. The reader cannot find the thesis statement. Underdeveloped paragraphs lack focus and topic sentences. No conclusion present.
No apparent organization present. Introduction explains subject, but does not engage readers. Thesis is difficult to find. Underdeveloped paragraphs lack focus and topic sentences. Weak conclusion offered.
Organization is clear, but with minor errors. Introduction explains subject, but does not adequately engage readers. Thesis may be m ...
Top of FormBenchmark Assignment - Analysis of a Theoretical Fram.docx
Top of Form
Benchmark Assignment - Analysis of a Theoretical Framework for Leadership
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
74.00%
3
Satisfactory
79.00%
4
Good
87.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
20.0 %Selection of Book About a Leader Who Chose Leadership as a Vocation
Does not select a book about a leader or provide an explanation as to why that person chose leadership as a vocation.
Selection of a book about a leader as well as explanation of why that person chose leadership as a vocation is incomplete or insufficient. Evidence to justify conclusions is vague or irrelevant. Subject knowledge is unclear or inconsistent.
Presents an elemental selection of a book about a leader as well as explanation of why that person chose leadership as a vocation. Some subject knowledge is evident.
Presents a selection of a book about a leader as well as explanation of why that person chose leadership as a vocation. Detailed examples and evidence are included. Subject knowledge is competent.
Presents a thorough and fully-developed selection of a book about a leader as well as explanation of why that person chose leadership as a vocation. Offers detailed evidence that justifies conclusions about the selection and explanation. Includes relevant examples and applicable insight. Demonstrates comprehensive subject knowledge and understanding.
25.0 %Theoretical Framework, Style, and Leadership Traits present in the Work 2.1: Analyze theories of leadership and motivation in order to inspire followership.
Does not examine the theoretical framework, style, and leadership traits that present in the selected work as well as how the individual has adopted leadership as their vocation.
Examination of the theoretical framework, style, and leadership traits that present in the selected work as well as how the individual has adopted leadership as their vocation is incomplete or insufficient. Evidence to justify conclusions is vague and/or irrelevant. Subject knowledge is unclear and/or inconsistent.
Presents an elemental examination of the theoretical framework, style, and leadership traits that present in the selected work as well as how the individual has adopted leadership as their vocation. Some subject knowledge is evident.
Presents an examination of the theoretical framework, style, and leadership traits that present in the selected work as well as how the individual has adopted leadership as their vocation. Detailed examples and evidence are included. Subject knowledge is competent.
Presents a thorough and fully-developed examination of the theoretical framework, style, and leadership traits that present in the selected work as well as how the individual has adopted leadership as their vocation. Offers detailed evidence that justifies conclusions about the examination. Includes relevant examples and applicable insight. Demonstrates comprehensive subject knowledge and understanding.
25.0 %Qualities and Shortcomings of the Selected Leader
Does not ...
1Unsatisfactory0.002Less Than Satisfactory65.003Sa.docx
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less Than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
75.0 %Content
20.0 %Legal and Ethical Implications: Reflection Regarding Students
Does not reflect on the information from specific articles.
Reflects on the information from specific articles, but reflection lacks depth of insight.
Reflection indicates legal and ethical implications for classroom management as it relates to students.
Implications are adequately described and an opinion is expressed.
Implications are described clearly with anecdotes.
20.0 %Legal and Ethical Implications: Reflection Regarding Parents
Does not reflect on the information from specific articles.
Reflects on the information from specific articles, but reflection lacks depth of insight.
Reflection indicates legal and ethical implications for classroom management as it relates to parents.
Implications are adequately described and an opinion is expressed.
Implications are described clearly with anecdotes.
15.0 %Legal and Ethical Implications: Reflection Regarding Teachers
Does not reflect on the information from specific articles.
Reflects on the information from specific articles, but reflection lacks depth of insight.
Reflection indicates legal and ethical implications for classroom management as it relates to teachers.
Implications are adequately described and an opinion is expressed.
Implications are described clearly with anecdotes.
20.0 %Informing Personal Classroom Management System
Does not include ways in which this informs a personal classroom management system.
Analysis of the implications of legal and ethical issues regarding the rights of students, teachers and parents for classroom management is sketchy and lacks depth of insight.
Essay contains an analysis of how legal and ethical issues regarding the rights of students, teachers and parents inform a personal classroom management system.
Analysis is clear and concisely presented.
Analysis draws specific conclusions about how these implications affect the student's personal classroom management system.
15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
5.0 %Argument Logic and Construction
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is in part or wholly incoherent.
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic.
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose.
Argument is strong, showing logical progressions. Firm control of the technique of argumentation is evident. Smooth progression of claims
The argument presents a clear, convincing and persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner.
5.0 %Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.)
Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction,.
ENG-106 Rubric Proposal EssayCriteria Value1 Unsatisfacto.docx
ENG-106 Rubric: Proposal Essay
Criteria
% Value
1: Unsatisfactory
2: Less Than Satisfactory
3: Satisfactory
4: Good
5: Excellent
% Scaling
0%
65%
75%
85%
100%
Content & Ideas – 40%
Proposal
Content and Ideas Should:
Include an effective title.
Use a thesis that centers on a proposal argument.
Give a problem presence.
Develop the proposal argument by using claim-type strategies that support proposals (categorical, ethical, and/or cause and effect claims).
Present specific evidence to supplement supporting arguments.
40%
Does not have title, and has missing or indiscernible thesis statement and minimal evidence to support main ideas. The writer gives the problem no presence. Argument includes elements of a proposal, but the argument does not center on the proposal. The writer does not use strategies that support proposal arguments.
Title may not suggest subject and does not spark interest. Thesis statement and/or the controlling idea are not clearly stated. The writer gives the problem little presence. Argument includes elements of proposals, but the argument does not center on a proposal and/or the writer does not use strategies that support proposal arguments very well. Ideas are underdeveloped and clichéd. They do not support the thesis. Evidence from outside sources can be irrelevant.
Title suggests subject but does not spark interest. Thesis statement identifies the main point the author is trying to make. The writer gives the problem some presence, though the problem could be explained more forcefully. Most of content relates to thesis statement, but lacks sufficient support through appropriate strategies for making proposal arguments (categorical, ethical, and/or cause and effect claims). Argument may not center specifically on a proposal. Cited evidence sometimes does not justify ideas.
Title suggests subject but does not necessarily spark interest. Thesis statement clearly identifies the main point the author is trying to make. The writer gives the problem presence. Argument centers specifically on a proposal and uses strategies that support it (categorical, ethical, and/or cause and effect claims). Most of the content supports thesis, and cited evidence usually justifies ideas.
Title suggests subject and sparks interest. With a clear, controlling idea, thesis statement effectively identifies the main proposal the student is trying to make. The student gives the problem full presence. Content supports thesis well by effectively using strategies that support proposals as necessary (categorical, ethical, and/or cause and effect claims). Specific, cited evidence justifies ideas and enriches the essay.
Organization – 12%
Organization
12%
No apparent organization present. The piece does not explain that a problem exists, provide a solution, and/or justify the solution. Ineffective introduction does not invite readers or explain the subject. The reader cannot find the thesis statement. Underdeveloped paragraphs lack focus and topic sent ...
Assignment RubricUnit 6 assignment grading rubric. Instructors En.docx
Assignment RubricUnit 6 assignment grading rubric. Instructors: Enter total available points in cell H2, and values between 0 and 4 in the yellow cells in the Score column. Total available points =100Content RubricIntroductoryEmergentPracticedProficient/MasteredScoreWeightFinal Score0 - 1.92 - 2.93 - 3.94Content QualitySubmission does not address most of the assignment requirements and/or indicates no understanding of critical concepts.Includes some of the assignment requirements. Opinions and ideas may indicate misconceptions or little understanding of some critical concepts.Includes all assignment requirements with minor errors/omissions, supports opinions and ideas creatively, clearly, and correctly. Displays understanding of most critical concepts.Includes all assignment requirements, supports opinions and ideas creatively, clearly, and correctly with details and examples where appropriate. Displays complete understanding of critical concepts.90%0.00ResourcesDoes not include any resources (0) or sources utilized are not relevant and credible sources of information(1).Not all sources utilized are relevant and/or credible and/or does not meet the required number of sources.Supports many opinions and ideas with relevant and credible sources of information; meets the required number and types of resources.Supports opinions and ideas with relevant and credible sources of information; meets or exceeds the required number and types of resources.10%0.00Content Score0Writing Deduction RubricIntroductoryEmergentPracticedProficient/MasteredScoreWeightFinal Score0-1234Grammar & PunctuationThe overall meaning of the paper is difficult to understand. Sentence structure, subject verb agreement errors, missing prepositions, and missing punctuation make finding meaning difficult.Several confusing sentences or 1 to 2 confusing paragraphs make understanding parts of the paper difficult, but the overall paper meaning is clear. Many subject verb agreement errors, run-on sentences, etc. cause confusion.A few confusing sentences make it difficult to understand a small portion of the paper. However, the overall meaning of a paragraph and the paper are intact. There may be a few subject verb agreement errors or some missing punctuation.There are one or two confusing sentences, but the overall sentence and paragraph meanings are clear. There are a few minor punctuation errors such as comma splices or run-on sentences.435%1.40SpellingThe many misspelled words and incorrect words choices significantly interfere with the readability.Many typos, misspelled words, or the use of incorrect words making understanding difficult in a few places.Some misspelled words or the misuse of words such as confusing then/than. However, intent is still clear.A few misspelled words normally caught by spellcheckers are present but do not significantly interfere with the overall readability of the paper.435%1.40Order of Ideas & Length RequirementPaper has some good information ...
ENG-106 Rubric Cause and Effect Argument Criteria Value1 .docx
ENG-106 Rubric: Cause and Effect Argument
Criteria
% Value
1: Unsatisfactory
2: Less Than Satisfactory
3: Satisfactory
4: Good
5: Excellent
% Scaling
0%
65%
75%
85%
100%
Content & Ideas – 40%
Cause and Effect Content and Ideas Should:
Include an effective title.
Present a thesis that centers specifically on a problem of cause and effect.
Use cause and effect chains and inductive reasoning to support the cause and effect argument established in the thesis.
Cite evidence that supports the cause and effect chains and inductive reasoning.
40%
Does not have title, and has missing or indiscernible thesis statement and minimal evidence to support main ideas. Argument includes elements of cause/effect, but the argument does not center on causes or consequences. The student does not use strategies that support cause and effect arguments.
Title may not suggest subject and does not spark interest. Thesis statement and/or the controlling idea are not clearly stated. Argument includes elements of cause/effect, but the argument does not center on causes or consequences and/or the writer does not use strategies that support cause and effect arguments very well. Ideas are underdeveloped and clichéd. They do not support the thesis. Evidence from outside sources can be irrelevant.
Title suggests subject but does not spark interest. Thesis statement identifies the main point the author is trying to make. Most of content relates to thesis statement, but lacks sufficient support through appropriate strategies. Argument may not center specifically on cause/effect or use strategies that support cause and effect arguments effectively. Cited evidence sometimes does not justify ideas.
Title suggests subject but does not necessarily spark interest. Thesis statement clearly identifies the main point the author is trying to make. Argument centers specifically on cause/effect and uses strategies that support cause and effect arguments (cause and effect chains and inductive reasoning). Most of the content supports thesis, and cited evidence usually justifies ideas.
Title suggests subject and sparks interest. With a clear, controlling idea, thesis statement effectively identifies the main point the student is trying to make. Content supports thesis well. Argument centers specifically on cause/effect and effectively uses strategies that support cause and effect arguments (cause and effect chains and inductive reasoning). Specific, cited evidence justifies ideas and enriches the essay.
Organization – 12%
Organization
12%
No apparent organization present. Ineffective introduction does not invite readers or explain the subject. The reader cannot find the thesis statement. Underdeveloped paragraphs lack focus and topic sentences. No conclusion present.
No apparent organization present. Introduction explains subject, but does not engage readers. Thesis is difficult to find. Underdeveloped paragraphs lack focus and topic sentences. Weak conclusion offered.
Organization is cl ...
ENG-106 Rubric Definition Argument Criteria Value1 Unsati.docx
ENG-106 Rubric: Definition Argument
Criteria
% Value
1: Unsatisfactory
2: Less Than Satisfactory
3: Satisfactory
4: Good
5: Excellent
% Scaling
0%
65%
75%
85%
100%
Content & Ideas – 40%
Definition Argument Content and Ideas Should:
Include an effective title.
Provide a thesis that centers specifically on an argument of definition.
Establish clear criteria related to the definition in question.
Match one or more cases to the established criteria.
Use evidence appropriate for definitional arguments.
40%
Does not have title, and has missing or indiscernible thesis statement and minimal evidence to support main ideas. Argument includes elements of reasoning by definition, but does not center on a definition argument. Student does not use outside sources.
Title may not suggest subject and does not spark interest. Thesis statement and/or the controlling idea are not clearly stated. Argument includes elements of a definitional argument, but does not use strategies (especially the criteria-match structure) very well. Ideas are underdeveloped and clichéd. They do not support the thesis. Evidence from outside sources can be irrelevant.
Title suggests subject but does not spark interest. Thesis statement identifies the main point the author is trying to make. Most of content relates to thesis statement, but lacks sufficient support through appropriate strategies. Argument centers specifically on a definitional argument, but may not effectively uses strategies that support it, including matching criteria for definition arguments Cited evidence sometimes does not justify ideas.
Title suggests subject but does not necessarily spark interest. Thesis statement clearly identifies the main point the author is trying to make. Argument centers specifically on a definitional argument and uses strategies that support it, including matching criteria for definition arguments. Most of the content supports thesis, and cited evidence usually justifies ideas.
Title suggests subject and sparks interest. With a clear, controlling idea, thesis statement effectively identifies the main point the student is trying to make. Content supports thesis well. Argument centers specifically on a definitional argument and effectively uses strategies that support it, including matching criteria for definition arguments Specific, cited evidence justifies ideas and enriches the essay.
Organization – 12%
Organization
12%
No apparent organization present. Ineffective introduction does not invite readers or explain the subject. The reader cannot find the thesis statement. Underdeveloped paragraphs lack focus and topic sentences. No conclusion present.
No apparent organization present. Introduction explains subject, but does not engage readers. Thesis is difficult to find. Underdeveloped paragraphs lack focus and topic sentences. Weak conclusion offered.
Organization is clear, but with minor errors. Introduction explains subject, but does not adequately engage readers. Thesis may be m ...
Top of FormBenchmark - Research Critique Part 1 1Unsatisfa.docx
Top of Form
Benchmark - Research Critique Part 1
1
Unsatisfactory 0%-71%
71.00%
2
Less Than Satisfactory 72%-75%
75.00%
3
Satisfactory 76%-83%
79.00%
4
Good 84%-89%
89.00%
5
Excellent 90% - 100%
100.00%
80.0 %Content
20.0 %Research problem and purpose
Does not mention research problem or purpose of study.
There are some inaccuracies in describing the research problem.
The research problem and purpose are present and mostly accurate.
The research problem and purpose are described with reference to nursing.
The problem and purpose of the study are clearly articulated, and their importance to nursing addressed.
20.0 %Research objective, questions or hypotheses
Does not mention objections, research question (s) or hypotheses.
There are some inaccuracies describing the research objective, questions or hypotheses.
The research objective, questions or hypotheses are present and mostly accurate.
The research objective, question or hypotheses are described and related to study methods.
Research question is clearly and accurately described and is congruent with research purpose, method, and worldview of researcher.
20.0 %Literature Review
Does not mention literature review.
There are some inaccuracies describing the literature review.
The literature review elements are discussed and support the purpose of the study.
The literature review and how it supports the purpose of the study are described.
The literature review critique is thorough and clear, and supports the purpose and research question.
20.0 %Frame of Reference (qualitative)
Does not mention frame of reference
There are some inaccuracies describing frame of reference.
The frame of reference elements are present and mostly accurate.
The frame of reference is described.
The frame of reference is thorough, clear, and accurately described using research terminology.
15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
5.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
5.0 %Paragraph Development and Transitions
Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. Organization is disjointed.
Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident.
Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each o ...
Collaborate Summary RubricCollaborate Summary RubricCriteria0 Poin.docx
Collaborate Summary RubricCollaborate Summary RubricCriteria0 Points - Unacceptable1 Point - Needs Improvement2 Points - Satisfactory3 Points - ExemplaryContent of SummaryDid not provide summarySummary provided less than acceptable evidence that session recording was watched in its entirety. Summary provided satisfactory evidence that session recording was watched in its entirety. Summary proved the student watched and paid attention to the entire session recording. PresentationDid not provide summarySummary not presented in essay form (e.g. bullet lists)Summary provided in essay form, but did not meet 2 page, double spaced, in 11 or 12 point font requirement, or summary was not submitted through Blackboard or not composed in Microsoft Word.Summary met 2 page, double spaced, in 11 or 12 point font requirement. Submitted through the assignment link and composed in Microsoft Word.Clarity & MechanicsDid not provide summary
Summary presented in an unorganized or somewhat unorganized manner, with some clarity and/or grammatical or spelling errors.Summary presented in an organized manner with minor clarity and grammatical or spelling errors.Summary presented in a clear, concise manner and formatted in an easy to read style with no grammatical or spelling errors. Total # of Possible Points: 9
Discussion Board RubricDiscussion Board RubricCriteria0 Points - Unacceptable1 Point - Needs Improvement2 Points - Satisfactory3 Points - ExcellentInitial Posting Timing & Relevance Zero posts or does not meet instructor timeline and requirements.Superficial thought. Adressed limited aspects relevant to the prompt and does not demonstrate understaning of key concepts.
Met partial elements of instructor timeline and requirementsThoughts were well developed and addressed basic aspects relevant to the prompt and demonstrated base knowledge of concepts.
Mostly met instructor timeline and requirements.Thoughts were well developed and fully addressed all aspects relevant to the prompt. Demonstrated excellent integration of key comcepts. Met or exceeded instructor timeline and requirements.Reply Postings Timeline & RelevanceZero replies, or replies not relevant to discussion topicsReplies were limited in relevance or did not enrich discussion (e.g. agrees or disagrees) or met partial elements of instructor timeline and requirements.Elaborated on posts with further comment or observation, relevant to topic. Mostly met instructor timeline and requirements.Demonstrated analysis of others' posts, included meaningful comments. Offered thoughtful insight. Met or exceeded instructor timeline and requirements.Clarity & Mechanics & ReferenceZero posts, or posted unorganized content that may contain multiple grammatical or spelling errors or may be inappropriate. Did not meet instructor requirements for references and citations.Communicated in a somewhat unorganized manner, with some errors in clarity and/or grammatical or spelling errors. Partically met instructor requ ...
Evaluate your improvements made and weaknesses that still persist .docx
Evaluate your improvements made and weaknesses that still persist in your writing style. Discuss the following elements of writing style:
Type your response in a word file. Include your full name (Jada Nelson), your professor’s name (Professor Hope), the course number (ENG1105) and the word count in the upper left-hand corner, Double-space your draft.
a. Paragraphs and transitions: providing one main point per paragraph instead of mixing ideas, using strong topic sentences and smooth transitions.
(The information to use)
Paragraphs for the most parts have been good but I've struggled with transitioning to a new paragraph. Otherwise, I don't really mix ideas when I have a certain topic in mind for a paragraph.
b. Sentences: using sentence-combining skills and different types of sentences for effect.
(The information to use)
This has been somewhat rocky for me just because of the word requirements. I've been trying my best at it but I have let a few sentences slide just so I've been able to reach the word requirements.
c. Word choice: carefully choosing the best words, using appropriate diction.
(The information to use)
I feel like my wording has been good most of the course except for the second essay (proposal essay). I'm not really sure why I struggled so much with the essay. For the most part my word choice has been decent.
Write in complete sentences, and provide specific examples to illustrate your discussion. The essay must be between 500-750 words.
Write 5 paragraphs please.
Paragraph 1:
Introduction
Paragraph 2:
A. Paragraphs and transitions: providing one main point per paragraph instead of mixing ideas, using strong topic sentences and smooth transitions.
Paragraph 3:
B. Sentences: using sentence-combining skills and different types of sentences for effect.
Paragraph 4:
C Word choice: carefully choosing the best words, using appropriate diction.
Paragraph 5:
Conclusion
NOOOOOOOOOO PLAGIARISM!!!!!!!!!!!!
· APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to the current APA style and formatting. See
Evidence and APA.
· Number of resources: Minimum of 6 scholarly sources. Distinguished submissions will likely exceed this number.
· Length of paper: 6–8 typed, double-spaced pages. Additionally, a title page and references page.
· Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.
[removed]
Undergraduate Pathways ENG1105
ESSAY EXAM RUBRIC QUESTION #____ Name:______________________
CONTENT “A” PAPER “B” PAPER “C” PAPER “D/F” PAPER
Addressing Type
of Essay Question
Accurately identifies the essay
terms being used in the question;
designs answer that specifically
addresses the question; precisely
and lucidly discusses the subject
under the terms for examination
Definite recognition the essay terms
being used in the question; designs an
answer which addresses the terms;
correctly discusses the subject under
the terms for examin.
Number of pages 12 Deadline 42 HoursInstructions This ass.docx
Number of pages: 12
Deadline: 42 Hours
Instructions: This assignment includes several different sections and number of pages for each. I've given specific details in the attachment
All instructions/details/guidelines, as outlined and given in the other document, must be followed and adhered to
Paper written must meet all the requirements and parts given/outlined in the other document
Choose a grade level and social studies topic with supporting standards and plan a lesson to present in the classroom. Include grade-level appropriate activities that encourage active student engagement.
Address the following in your lesson plan:
1. Multiple intelligences
2. Authentic literature
3. Depth of Knowledge
4. Assessment of objective- Use three formative assessments during the lesson and one summative assessment at the end.
Teach your social studies lesson to a classroom of students.
In an essay of 1,000-1,250-words, reflect on the lesson and content.
Cite at least four references from educational journals and academic websites to support your teaching strategies.
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less Than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
25.0 %Lesson Plan
The lesson plan is missing many of the required components. The activities are missing, weak, or incomplete. Activities and assessments are not grade appropriate.
The lesson plan consists of most of the required components. Attention to detail is minimal, underdeveloped, or inappropriate for teaching. Activities and assessments are mostly grade appropriate.
The lesson plan consists of all the required components. Activities and assessments are appropriate for grade level and encourage participation.
All lesson plan components are addressed. The thinking skills and activities are thoughtfully developed and provide meaningful practice with familiar text. The activities are fun, interactive, and creative.
All lesson components are addressed. Exceptionally organized activities that create multiple and meaningful opportunities to practice. Activities are engaging.
45.0 %Reflection Essay
Content is incomplete and omits most of the requirements stated in the assignment’s criteria. Major points are irrelevant to the assignment. No outside sources were used to support major points.
Content is incomplete or omits some requirements stated in the assignment’s criteria. Major points are not clear and/or persuasive. No outside sources were used to support major points.
Content addresses most of the issues stated in the assignment’s criteria. Major points are addressed. Research is evident.
Content is comprehensive, accurate, and definitions are clearly stated. Major points are stated clearly and are supported. Research is adequate, up-to-date, relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment’s criteria. At least two relevant academic sources were cited.
Content is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive; definitions are clearly stated..
Masters Level Grading Rubric For Assessment of Report1-4 Scal
Masters Level Grading Rubric For Assessment of Report
1-4 Scale
Weight
Student Score
1
2
3
4
Percentage Score
0 to 59
59-68
69-71
72-75
76-79
80-84
85-89
90-100
Grades
F
C
B-
B
B+
A-
A
A+
Mastery Level
Beginning
Developing
Competent
Mastery
Standard Level
Below Standard
Approaching Standard
At Standard
Exceeds Standard
Subject Matter
50
Problem, Background
Problem statement is poorly crafted or missing or is misstated
Problem statement is not well-crafted but is acceptable
Problem statement is reasonably well-crafted and is specific to the issue
Problem statement is well-crafted, specific and represents a novel outlook on the issue
Discussion of Findings
Discussion is incorrect
correct, missing many of the pros with little or no discussion of negatives
Discussion is inadequately
correct, missing some of the pros and most or all of the cons
Discussion is correct, taking into account most of the pros and cons and represents a solid level of research
Discussion is complete and correct, taking into account pros and cons and represents a full level of research with novel conclusions
Managerial Recommendation
Recommendations are not supported
and demonstrat little or no understanding of problem or the consequences of implementation
Recommendations are inadequately supported
and do not represent reasonable understanding of problem or the consequences of implementation, with alternate solution available
Recommendations are adequately supported and represents reasonable understanding of problem, some of the consequences of implementation and may have and alternate solution available
Recommendations are fully supported and represents superior understanding of problem, consequences of implementation and has alternate solutions available
Professionalism
Student unable or nearly unable to work independently
and did not successfully meet project deadlines needing constant feedback/help, unresponsive to written/verbal feedback
Student had problems working independently
and had problems successfully meeting project deadlines needing significant feedback/help, not fully responsive to written/verbal feedback
Student worked mostly independently and met most project deadlines needing some feedback/help, mostly responsive to written/verbal feedback
Student worked independently and met all project deadlines striking an exceptional balance between working independently but asking for necessary feedback/help while exceptionally responsive to written/verbal feedback
References
References are not appropriate to the subject matter or are missing
References are not fully
appropriate to the subject matter
References are timely and appropriate to the subject matter
References represent a complete literature survey are timely and appropriate to the subject matter
Tables/Charts
Tables, charts and other media
poorly support the presentation of the material of the report or are not present when they would be of value
Tables, charts and o ...
Masters Level Grading Rubric For Assessment of Report1-4 Scal
Masters Level Grading Rubric For Assessment of Report
1-4 Scale
Weight
Student Score
1
2
3
4
Percentage Score
0 to 59
59-68
69-71
72-75
76-79
80-84
85-89
90-100
Grades
F
C
B-
B
B+
A-
A
A+
Mastery Level
Beginning
Developing
Competent
Mastery
Standard Level
Below Standard
Approaching Standard
At Standard
Exceeds Standard
Subject Matter
50
Problem, Background
Problem statement is poorly crafted or missing or is misstated
Problem statement is not well-crafted but is acceptable
Problem statement is reasonably well-crafted and is specific to the issue
Problem statement is well-crafted, specific and represents a novel outlook on the issue
Discussion of Findings
Discussion is incorrect
correct, missing many of the pros with little or no discussion of negatives
Discussion is inadequately
correct, missing some of the pros and most or all of the cons
Discussion is correct, taking into account most of the pros and cons and represents a solid level of research
Discussion is complete and correct, taking into account pros and cons and represents a full level of research with novel conclusions
Managerial Recommendation
Recommendations are not supported
and demonstrat little or no understanding of problem or the consequences of implementation
Recommendations are inadequately supported
and do not represent reasonable understanding of problem or the consequences of implementation, with alternate solution available
Recommendations are adequately supported and represents reasonable understanding of problem, some of the consequences of implementation and may have and alternate solution available
Recommendations are fully supported and represents superior understanding of problem, consequences of implementation and has alternate solutions available
Professionalism
Student unable or nearly unable to work independently
and did not successfully meet project deadlines needing constant feedback/help, unresponsive to written/verbal feedback
Student had problems working independently
and had problems successfully meeting project deadlines needing significant feedback/help, not fully responsive to written/verbal feedback
Student worked mostly independently and met most project deadlines needing some feedback/help, mostly responsive to written/verbal feedback
Student worked independently and met all project deadlines striking an exceptional balance between working independently but asking for necessary feedback/help while exceptionally responsive to written/verbal feedback
References
References are not appropriate to the subject matter or are missing
References are not fully
appropriate to the subject matter
References are timely and appropriate to the subject matter
References represent a complete literature survey are timely and appropriate to the subject matter
Tables/Charts
Tables, charts and other media
poorly support the presentation of the material of the report or are not present when they would be of value
Tables, charts and o ...
CategoryExceeds Standard AMeets Standard BBelow Standard .docx
Category
Exceeds Standard: A
Meets Standard: B
Below Standard: C
Does not meet Standard: F
Reflect personal learning in concert experience
Shows great depth of knowledge and learning, reveals feelings and thoughts, abstract ideas reflected through use of specific details.
Relates learning with research and project, personal and general reflections included, uses concrete language.
Does not go deeply into the reflection of learning, generalizations and limited insight, uses some detail.
Little or no explanation or reflection on learning, no or few details to support reflection.
Evidence
All claims and statements are backed up with concrete evidence
Most claims and statements are backed up with concrete evidence
Claims are vaguely backed up with evidence
Little or no evidence presented
Voice
Writing appropriate and engaging for audience
Writing appropriate for audience
Writing unclear for audience
Writing unsuitable for audience
Organization- Structural Development of the Idea
Writer demonstrates logical and subtle sequencing of ideas through well- developed paragraphs; transitions are used to enhance organization. Includes engaging introduction and conclusion
Paragraph development present but not perfected. Introduction and Conclusion present
Hazy organization; organization of ideas not fully developed. Introduction and conclusion vague, dull.
No evidence of structure or organization, conclusion or introduction.
Mechanics
No errors in punctuation, capitalization and spelling. No contractions
Almost no errors in punctuation, capitalization and spelling. Some contractions.
Many errors in punctuation, capitalization and spelling. Many contractions.
Numerous and distracting errors in punctuation, capitalization and spelling. Numerous Contractions.
Usage
No errors in sentence structure, flow and word usage
Few errors in sentence structure, flow and word usage
Many errors in sentence structure, flow and word usage
Numerous and distracting errors in sentence structure and word usage.
Appearance
Creative and attractive title; clear font and formatting; header with name, date; bibliography/citation list (if needed)
Title; clear font and formatting; header with name, date; bibliography/citation list (if needed)
One to two elements missing
Multiple elements missing
Ability to incorporate feedback (if constructive feedback is received)
Constructive feedback successfully incorporated into revised paper
Constructive feedback mostly successfully incorporated into revised paper
Constructive feedback largely ignored
Constructive feedback completely ignored
Academic Honesty
No plagiarism or collusion with other students appears. Citations are properly formatted in MLA or APA style.
Plagiarism of any kind: AUTOMATIC FAILURE OF ASSIGNMENT
...
Strategic Management Course The report should includ.docx
Strategic Management Course
The report should include the following elements in clear specific points:
1. State organization’s vision, mission and goals/objectives. Critically analyze the vision and mission as discussed in the class
2. Identify targeted market segment and customers or people the organization provide services/product to.
3. What type of products and/or services does the organization provide?
4. What is the philosophy in producing the above goods and/or services?
5. Using the Analysis matrices perform a stage-wise analysis by creating metrices for the organization.
6. From the above mentioned metrices analysis, critically identify which competitive or business strategy is considered in order
to reach your vision and goals?
Must include a PowerPoint presentation and written report, which includes:
(1) An official cover-page/slide.
(2) Introduction identifying the chosen topic and its importance (Executive Summery).
(3) A background of the chosen organization/business, and its industry.
(4) Discussion of the main 6 points mentioned above. The arguments should be based on what you have learnt in the course.
(5) Include a Conclusion which provides the organization’s way forward strategy.
General guidelines:
1- The written report should be between 2000-4000 words max.
2- Use both primary and secondary sources to collect data and information to build your report & presentation.
3- The PowerPoint presentation should take no longer than 15 mins, followed by 10 mins for questions.
4- Make sure to include visual aids such as graphs, tables, diagrams and/or pictures to highlight your points clearly, both in the
report and in the PowerPoint presentation.
5- Writing Guidelines: Paper size: A4, Line Spacing: 1.15, Margins: Normal all sides, Font: Times New Roman, Font Size: 12
for text and 14 for heading.
6- Your report and slides should be grammatically correct, well punctuated, clear, concise, neatly presented, and easy to read.
Literature Review Rubric Name: ___________________________ Date: ___________________ Score: __________________
Category Exceeds Standard Meets Standard Nearly Meets Standard Does not meet standard
Title Page Title, Your name, Course
Name, Date,
Instructor’s name,
Institution
All relevant parts of the
title page are included.
The title is appropriate but
is not be very concise
Some needed elements
are missing.
The title page is either
missing or contains
inaccuracies. The title
page does not follow APA
style.
Introduction Clearly and concisely
describes topic and its
importance, why the topic
was chosen, and questions
to be answered.
Describes topic and its
importance; fails to
describe key questions
Introduction describes the
topic and its importance
ambiguously.
Introduction is incomplete
and/or nonfocused. Does
not adequately convey
topic.
Review of Literature Succinctly summarizes .
PSYC 221Book Report Grading RubricStudent _____________.docx
PSYC 221
Book Report Grading Rubric
Student: _______________________________
20
17.8
15.8
13.8
11.8
0
Structure and Organization
Clear introduction and strong subject evidence; clear and appropriate transitions; appropriate paragraphing; logical, strong conclusion rising from content.
Generally clear
introduction and focused; generally clear and appropriate transitions; mostly appropriate paragraphing; adequate conclusion – relates to content but lacks objectivity or is vague.
Adequate introduction; unclear; adequate transitions; reader can follow what is being said, but the paper’s overall organization is choppy; adequate paragraphs; conclusion is simplistic.
Weak introduction; weak transitions; main points can be ascertained, but difficult to follow what is being said; weak and long paragraphing; conclusion repeats introduction .
Weak introduction and does not draw reader’s interest; little or no transitions; organization is disjointed and haphazard; paragraphs are weak; lacks conclusion.
No assignment was turned in.
Content
Assignment parameters (length 6–7 pages, subject, objectives) are observed;
focus is clear and coherent (good sense of audience); obvious understanding of subject; orderly development; conclusion/reflection are clearly supported and/or illustrated
Assignment parameters (length 4–5 pages, subject, objectives) are observed; focus is generally clear and coherent (general sense of audience); good understanding of subject; adequate development; orderly, but stiff, choppy progression of evidence
Assignment parameters (length 2–3 pages, subject, objectives) not clearly observed; mostly focused (some sense of audience); thoughts randomly organized and presented; conclusions/reflection weakly supported and/or illustrated
Inadequate or minimal observance of assignment length, subject and objectives; weakly focused (little sense of audience); unclear progression of ideas; conclusions/reflection weakly supported and/or illustrated
Inadequate length; objectives of assignment not met; unfocused; little or no sense of audience; serious and persistent errors in organization and structure; lacks understanding of subject; disorganized; does not prove point, if one can be discerned
No assignment was turned in.
Grammar and Mechanics
Sentence fluency coherent, unified, varied; sentence structure complete; correct spelling, punctuation, capitalization; varied diction, word choices
Sentence fluency correct, varied; Minor errors in structure (fragments, run-ons); correct spelling, punctuation, capitalization; limited diction, word choices
Relatively few errors in sentence fluency; multiple fragments/run-ons, poor spelling, punctuation, and capitalization; limited diction, uses trite words, slang, and contractions
Significant errors in sentence fluency and structure, spelling, punctuation and capitalization; diction weak or inappropriate
Serious and persistent errors in: sentence fluency, sentence structure, spelling, ...
A. InstructionsRemember the word argument” does not mean a fi.docx
A. Instructions
Remember the word “argument” does not mean a fight in a writing context. An academic argument is more like a thoughtful conversation between two people with differing viewpoints on a debatable issue. However, you are required to take a position on one side of the issue.
Your submission must include an APA style reference page following the essay. In your research, you will need 2-4 credible primary or secondary sources to use as support in your essay.
On a separate page, below your reference page, include thoughtful answers to the Think About Your Writing questions. References and Think About Your Writing questions are NOT included in the word count for this essay.
B. Think About Your Writing
Below your reference page, include answers to all of the following reflection questions.
1. What have you learned about how to present a strong argument? How could/will you apply this knowledge in your professional or everyday life (3-4 sentences)?Sophia says: Think about the specific skills and techniques that you used while developing and writing your essay. What tools will you take with you from this experience?
2. Consider the English Composition I course as a whole. What have you learned about yourself as a writer (5-6 sentences)?Sophia says: What did you learn that surprised you? Is there anything that you have struggled with in the past that you now feel more confident about?
C. Argumentative Essay Guidelines
Refer to the checklist below throughout the writing process. Do not submit your research essay until it meets these guidelines. Print this checklist!
Argumentative Topic and Thesis Statement
❒ Have you included a thesis that takes a clear, specific position on one side of a debatable issue?
· If you'd like to have your thesis statement reviewed prior to submitting your full essay, you may email your thesis to [email protected] with "Working Thesis" in the subject line.*Argument Development
❒ Are all of the details relevant to the purpose of your essay?
❒ Is the argument supported using rhetorical appeals and source material?
❒ Is your essay 4-6 pages (approximately 1000-1500 words)? If not, which details do you need to add or delete?Research
❒ Have you cited outside sources effectively using quotation, summary, or paraphrase?
❒ Are the sources incorporated smoothly, providing the reader with signal phrases and context for the source information?
❒ Have you referenced a range of 2-4 credible sources?
❒ Have you included an APA style reference page below your essay?Organization and Flow
❒ Is there an introduction, conclusion, adequate body paragraphs, and a counterargument?
❒ Is the argument presented in a logical order and easy for the reader to follow?
❒ Are there transitions within and between paragraphs?Style
❒ Are the word choices accurate and effective?
❒ Are the sentence structures varied?Conventions and Formatting
❒ Have you properly cited your sources according to APA style guidelines?
❒ Have you double-checked for ...
WarningYou do not have permissions to perform this activityA.docx
Warning
You do not have permissions to perform this activity
Assignment
Week 10 | Diversity in the Health Care Organization
Details:
1) Providers must learn new tools to eliminate disparities, build trust with patients, and understand how international biases and pre-established stereotypes affect quality of care. Write a paper (1,000-1,250 words) that identifies and defines various tools and measurements that can be used to measure the effectiveness of diversity programs and policies established by the organization.
2) Address how each of the following must be considered when considering how to implement an environment of diversity:
a) Government regulations.
b) Social pressures.
c) Industry and company ethical codes.
d) Tension between personal standards and the goals of the organization.
3) Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
4) This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
Top of Form
Please Note: Assignment will not be submitted to the faculty member until the "Submit" button under "Final Submission" is clicked.
New Attempt
Bottom of Form
Title
Attached Documents
Turnitin Report
Similarity Index
Final Submission
Click 'New Attempt' to start assignment or attach documents
Error Details
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
Top of Form
Apply Rubrics
Addressing Diversity
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
100.0 %Content
40.0 %In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
Does not demonstrate understanding of the issues surrounding diversity, including the implications. Does not demonstrate critical thinking and analysis of the situation, and does not develop effective answers to the questions, with rationale.
Demonstrates only minimal understanding diversity. Demonstrates only minimal abilities for critical thinking and analysis of the case study, and develops weak answers to the questions, with minimal rationale
Demonstrates knowledge of issues surrounding diversity, but has some slight misunderstanding of the implications. Provides a basic idea of critical thinking and analysis for the questions, answers, and rationale. Does not include examples or descriptions.
Demonstrates acceptable knowledge of the issues surrounding diversity (in your own words). Develops an acceptable response and rationale for it. Utilizes some examples.
Demonstrates thorough knowledge of the issues surrounding diversity and their implications. Clearly answers the questions and develops a very strong rationale. Introduces appropri.
ENG130 – Literature and Composition Unit 4 Assignment .docx
ENG130 – Literature and Composition
Unit 4 Assignment
Essay ENG 130:
Developing an Argument
Due: 11:59 PM EST Sunday of Unit 4.
Length and format: 2-3 pages. The title page and reference page are also required, but they
should not be factored into the 2-3 page length of the essay. It should also be double
spaced, written in Times New Roman, and in 12 point font. Essay should conform to APA
formatting and citation style.
Instructions:
By definition, faith is believing in something without actually requiring concrete proof.
Conformity is abiding by certain rules, laws, and other societal norms. A person who
conforms often must follow specific rules.
The authors of both “Salvation” and “The Five Glorious Mysteries” create stories that deal
with the themes of faith and conformity. However, the characters’ words and actions do not
actually always add up to their viewpoint on faith and conformity. What does it mean to
speak one way but act in another manner? Select one of the essays from this unit, and form
an argument about what the author is trying to say about actions vs. words.
The requirements for Essay 4 are:
• Describe the effectiveness of the author’s argument.
o Select textual evidence from the essay to support your position.
• Analyze the examples used in the author’s essay.
o Develop topics that act to prove your argument.
o Support your argument with specific textual evidence.
• Include an APA title page.
• Use the objective voice, avoiding personal pronouns such as “I,” “you,” “we,” etc.
• Use APA format for in-text citations and References when using outside sources and
textual evidence.
Students: Be sure to read the criteria, by which your paper/project will be
evaluated, before you write, and again after you write.
Argument Rubric
0-4 5-10 11-15 16-20
Meets
Assignment
Requirements
Few assignment
requirements are
met.
Some
assignment
requirements
are met.
Most
assignment
requirements
are met.
Many to all
assignment
requirements
are fully met.
Thesis
Statement
(Controlling
Idea)
Thesis is
confusing, vague
or unclear.
Thesis is loosely
related to the
paper or not
present.
Thesis is
attempted with
little relation to
the overall topic.
Some
supporting
details missing.
Thesis is
present and
relates to the
majority of the
paper.
Thesis is
organized and
focused on the
paper. It
includes all
main points and
uses active
voice to state
the position.
Introduction Background
details are a
random
collection of
information,
unclear, or not
related to the
topic. There may
be no clear
introduction and
background
details.
Introduction
attempted
explains the
background, but
may lack detail.
Introduction
explains the
background,
including an
overview of the
essay’s main
points.
Introduction
uses interesting
anecdotes,
questions, or
other
information to
build interest.
Many to a ...
Explain how firms can benefit from forecastingexchange rates .docx
Explain how firms can benefit from forecasting
exchange rates
Describe the common techniques used for
forecasting
Explain how forecasting performance can be
evaluated
explain how interval forecasts can be applied
APA format, minimum 3 sources
Paper will be a minimum of 650 and a maximum of 900 words.
(This includes title section, content, and references…in other
words the entire paper)
.
•POL201 •Discussions •Week 5 - DiscussionVoter and Voter Tu.docx
• POL201 • Discussions • Week 5 - Discussion
Voter and Voter Turnout
Prepare: Prior to completing this discussion question, review Chapters 10, 11, and 12 in American Government and review Week Five Instructor Guidance. Also read the following articles: How Voter ID Laws Are Being Used to Disenfranchise Minorities and the Poor (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site., Fraught with Fraud (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site., and Proof at the Polls (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
Reflect: The U.S. has one of the lowest voter turnout rates among modern democratic political systems. One study ranks the U.S. 120th on a list of 169 nations compared on voter turnout (Pintor, Gratschew, & Sullivan, 2002). During the last decade, many initiatives have been undertaken to increase voter participation, yet concerns about the possibility of election fraud have also increased. Additionally, some political interests feel threatened by the increase in turnout among some traditionally low-turnout ethnic minorities. Several states have recently passed legislation imposing new registration and identification requirements. This has sparked debate about whether these are tactics intended to suppress turnout or to prevent fraud. Think about the media’s role in the election process and how both mass media and social media can impact the election process.
Write: In your initial post, summarize recent developments in several states enacting voter ID laws. Analyze and describe the pros and cons on both sides of the debate about these laws. Is voter fraud a major problem for our democracy or are some groups trying to make it harder for some segments of society to vote? What impact has the media (mass and social) had in influencing public opinion regarding voter ID laws? Draw your own conclusion about the debate over voter ID laws and justify your conclusions with facts and persuasive reasoning. Fully respond to all parts of the prompt and write your response in your own words. Your initial post must be at least 300 words. Support your position with at least two of the assigned resources required for this discussion, and/or peer reviewed scholarly sources obtained through the AU Library databases. Include APA in-text citations (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. in the body of your post and full citations on the references list (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. at the end. Support your position with APA citations from two or more of the assigned resources required for this discussion. Please be sure that you demonstrate understanding of these resources, integrate them into your argument, and cite them properly.
.
More Related Content
Similar to FYS Grading Rubric for Writing Assignment A 95 B .docx
Assignment RubricUnit 6 assignment grading rubric. Instructors En.docx
Assignment RubricUnit 6 assignment grading rubric. Instructors: Enter total available points in cell H2, and values between 0 and 4 in the yellow cells in the Score column. Total available points =100Content RubricIntroductoryEmergentPracticedProficient/MasteredScoreWeightFinal Score0 - 1.92 - 2.93 - 3.94Content QualitySubmission does not address most of the assignment requirements and/or indicates no understanding of critical concepts.Includes some of the assignment requirements. Opinions and ideas may indicate misconceptions or little understanding of some critical concepts.Includes all assignment requirements with minor errors/omissions, supports opinions and ideas creatively, clearly, and correctly. Displays understanding of most critical concepts.Includes all assignment requirements, supports opinions and ideas creatively, clearly, and correctly with details and examples where appropriate. Displays complete understanding of critical concepts.90%0.00ResourcesDoes not include any resources (0) or sources utilized are not relevant and credible sources of information(1).Not all sources utilized are relevant and/or credible and/or does not meet the required number of sources.Supports many opinions and ideas with relevant and credible sources of information; meets the required number and types of resources.Supports opinions and ideas with relevant and credible sources of information; meets or exceeds the required number and types of resources.10%0.00Content Score0Writing Deduction RubricIntroductoryEmergentPracticedProficient/MasteredScoreWeightFinal Score0-1234Grammar & PunctuationThe overall meaning of the paper is difficult to understand. Sentence structure, subject verb agreement errors, missing prepositions, and missing punctuation make finding meaning difficult.Several confusing sentences or 1 to 2 confusing paragraphs make understanding parts of the paper difficult, but the overall paper meaning is clear. Many subject verb agreement errors, run-on sentences, etc. cause confusion.A few confusing sentences make it difficult to understand a small portion of the paper. However, the overall meaning of a paragraph and the paper are intact. There may be a few subject verb agreement errors or some missing punctuation.There are one or two confusing sentences, but the overall sentence and paragraph meanings are clear. There are a few minor punctuation errors such as comma splices or run-on sentences.435%1.40SpellingThe many misspelled words and incorrect words choices significantly interfere with the readability.Many typos, misspelled words, or the use of incorrect words making understanding difficult in a few places.Some misspelled words or the misuse of words such as confusing then/than. However, intent is still clear.A few misspelled words normally caught by spellcheckers are present but do not significantly interfere with the overall readability of the paper.435%1.40Order of Ideas & Length RequirementPaper has some good information ...
ENG-106 Rubric Cause and Effect Argument Criteria Value1 .docx
ENG-106 Rubric: Cause and Effect Argument
Criteria
% Value
1: Unsatisfactory
2: Less Than Satisfactory
3: Satisfactory
4: Good
5: Excellent
% Scaling
0%
65%
75%
85%
100%
Content & Ideas – 40%
Cause and Effect Content and Ideas Should:
Include an effective title.
Present a thesis that centers specifically on a problem of cause and effect.
Use cause and effect chains and inductive reasoning to support the cause and effect argument established in the thesis.
Cite evidence that supports the cause and effect chains and inductive reasoning.
40%
Does not have title, and has missing or indiscernible thesis statement and minimal evidence to support main ideas. Argument includes elements of cause/effect, but the argument does not center on causes or consequences. The student does not use strategies that support cause and effect arguments.
Title may not suggest subject and does not spark interest. Thesis statement and/or the controlling idea are not clearly stated. Argument includes elements of cause/effect, but the argument does not center on causes or consequences and/or the writer does not use strategies that support cause and effect arguments very well. Ideas are underdeveloped and clichéd. They do not support the thesis. Evidence from outside sources can be irrelevant.
Title suggests subject but does not spark interest. Thesis statement identifies the main point the author is trying to make. Most of content relates to thesis statement, but lacks sufficient support through appropriate strategies. Argument may not center specifically on cause/effect or use strategies that support cause and effect arguments effectively. Cited evidence sometimes does not justify ideas.
Title suggests subject but does not necessarily spark interest. Thesis statement clearly identifies the main point the author is trying to make. Argument centers specifically on cause/effect and uses strategies that support cause and effect arguments (cause and effect chains and inductive reasoning). Most of the content supports thesis, and cited evidence usually justifies ideas.
Title suggests subject and sparks interest. With a clear, controlling idea, thesis statement effectively identifies the main point the student is trying to make. Content supports thesis well. Argument centers specifically on cause/effect and effectively uses strategies that support cause and effect arguments (cause and effect chains and inductive reasoning). Specific, cited evidence justifies ideas and enriches the essay.
Organization – 12%
Organization
12%
No apparent organization present. Ineffective introduction does not invite readers or explain the subject. The reader cannot find the thesis statement. Underdeveloped paragraphs lack focus and topic sentences. No conclusion present.
No apparent organization present. Introduction explains subject, but does not engage readers. Thesis is difficult to find. Underdeveloped paragraphs lack focus and topic sentences. Weak conclusion offered.
Organization is cl ...
ENG-106 Rubric Definition Argument Criteria Value1 Unsati.docx
ENG-106 Rubric: Definition Argument
Criteria
% Value
1: Unsatisfactory
2: Less Than Satisfactory
3: Satisfactory
4: Good
5: Excellent
% Scaling
0%
65%
75%
85%
100%
Content & Ideas – 40%
Definition Argument Content and Ideas Should:
Include an effective title.
Provide a thesis that centers specifically on an argument of definition.
Establish clear criteria related to the definition in question.
Match one or more cases to the established criteria.
Use evidence appropriate for definitional arguments.
40%
Does not have title, and has missing or indiscernible thesis statement and minimal evidence to support main ideas. Argument includes elements of reasoning by definition, but does not center on a definition argument. Student does not use outside sources.
Title may not suggest subject and does not spark interest. Thesis statement and/or the controlling idea are not clearly stated. Argument includes elements of a definitional argument, but does not use strategies (especially the criteria-match structure) very well. Ideas are underdeveloped and clichéd. They do not support the thesis. Evidence from outside sources can be irrelevant.
Title suggests subject but does not spark interest. Thesis statement identifies the main point the author is trying to make. Most of content relates to thesis statement, but lacks sufficient support through appropriate strategies. Argument centers specifically on a definitional argument, but may not effectively uses strategies that support it, including matching criteria for definition arguments Cited evidence sometimes does not justify ideas.
Title suggests subject but does not necessarily spark interest. Thesis statement clearly identifies the main point the author is trying to make. Argument centers specifically on a definitional argument and uses strategies that support it, including matching criteria for definition arguments. Most of the content supports thesis, and cited evidence usually justifies ideas.
Title suggests subject and sparks interest. With a clear, controlling idea, thesis statement effectively identifies the main point the student is trying to make. Content supports thesis well. Argument centers specifically on a definitional argument and effectively uses strategies that support it, including matching criteria for definition arguments Specific, cited evidence justifies ideas and enriches the essay.
Organization – 12%
Organization
12%
No apparent organization present. Ineffective introduction does not invite readers or explain the subject. The reader cannot find the thesis statement. Underdeveloped paragraphs lack focus and topic sentences. No conclusion present.
No apparent organization present. Introduction explains subject, but does not engage readers. Thesis is difficult to find. Underdeveloped paragraphs lack focus and topic sentences. Weak conclusion offered.
Organization is clear, but with minor errors. Introduction explains subject, but does not adequately engage readers. Thesis may be m ...
Top of FormBenchmark - Research Critique Part 1 1Unsatisfa.docx
Top of Form
Benchmark - Research Critique Part 1
1
Unsatisfactory 0%-71%
71.00%
2
Less Than Satisfactory 72%-75%
75.00%
3
Satisfactory 76%-83%
79.00%
4
Good 84%-89%
89.00%
5
Excellent 90% - 100%
100.00%
80.0 %Content
20.0 %Research problem and purpose
Does not mention research problem or purpose of study.
There are some inaccuracies in describing the research problem.
The research problem and purpose are present and mostly accurate.
The research problem and purpose are described with reference to nursing.
The problem and purpose of the study are clearly articulated, and their importance to nursing addressed.
20.0 %Research objective, questions or hypotheses
Does not mention objections, research question (s) or hypotheses.
There are some inaccuracies describing the research objective, questions or hypotheses.
The research objective, questions or hypotheses are present and mostly accurate.
The research objective, question or hypotheses are described and related to study methods.
Research question is clearly and accurately described and is congruent with research purpose, method, and worldview of researcher.
20.0 %Literature Review
Does not mention literature review.
There are some inaccuracies describing the literature review.
The literature review elements are discussed and support the purpose of the study.
The literature review and how it supports the purpose of the study are described.
The literature review critique is thorough and clear, and supports the purpose and research question.
20.0 %Frame of Reference (qualitative)
Does not mention frame of reference
There are some inaccuracies describing frame of reference.
The frame of reference elements are present and mostly accurate.
The frame of reference is described.
The frame of reference is thorough, clear, and accurately described using research terminology.
15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
5.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
5.0 %Paragraph Development and Transitions
Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. Organization is disjointed.
Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident.
Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each o ...
Collaborate Summary RubricCollaborate Summary RubricCriteria0 Poin.docx
Collaborate Summary RubricCollaborate Summary RubricCriteria0 Points - Unacceptable1 Point - Needs Improvement2 Points - Satisfactory3 Points - ExemplaryContent of SummaryDid not provide summarySummary provided less than acceptable evidence that session recording was watched in its entirety. Summary provided satisfactory evidence that session recording was watched in its entirety. Summary proved the student watched and paid attention to the entire session recording. PresentationDid not provide summarySummary not presented in essay form (e.g. bullet lists)Summary provided in essay form, but did not meet 2 page, double spaced, in 11 or 12 point font requirement, or summary was not submitted through Blackboard or not composed in Microsoft Word.Summary met 2 page, double spaced, in 11 or 12 point font requirement. Submitted through the assignment link and composed in Microsoft Word.Clarity & MechanicsDid not provide summary
Summary presented in an unorganized or somewhat unorganized manner, with some clarity and/or grammatical or spelling errors.Summary presented in an organized manner with minor clarity and grammatical or spelling errors.Summary presented in a clear, concise manner and formatted in an easy to read style with no grammatical or spelling errors. Total # of Possible Points: 9
Discussion Board RubricDiscussion Board RubricCriteria0 Points - Unacceptable1 Point - Needs Improvement2 Points - Satisfactory3 Points - ExcellentInitial Posting Timing & Relevance Zero posts or does not meet instructor timeline and requirements.Superficial thought. Adressed limited aspects relevant to the prompt and does not demonstrate understaning of key concepts.
Met partial elements of instructor timeline and requirementsThoughts were well developed and addressed basic aspects relevant to the prompt and demonstrated base knowledge of concepts.
Mostly met instructor timeline and requirements.Thoughts were well developed and fully addressed all aspects relevant to the prompt. Demonstrated excellent integration of key comcepts. Met or exceeded instructor timeline and requirements.Reply Postings Timeline & RelevanceZero replies, or replies not relevant to discussion topicsReplies were limited in relevance or did not enrich discussion (e.g. agrees or disagrees) or met partial elements of instructor timeline and requirements.Elaborated on posts with further comment or observation, relevant to topic. Mostly met instructor timeline and requirements.Demonstrated analysis of others' posts, included meaningful comments. Offered thoughtful insight. Met or exceeded instructor timeline and requirements.Clarity & Mechanics & ReferenceZero posts, or posted unorganized content that may contain multiple grammatical or spelling errors or may be inappropriate. Did not meet instructor requirements for references and citations.Communicated in a somewhat unorganized manner, with some errors in clarity and/or grammatical or spelling errors. Partically met instructor requ ...
Evaluate your improvements made and weaknesses that still persist .docx
Evaluate your improvements made and weaknesses that still persist in your writing style. Discuss the following elements of writing style:
Type your response in a word file. Include your full name (Jada Nelson), your professor’s name (Professor Hope), the course number (ENG1105) and the word count in the upper left-hand corner, Double-space your draft.
a. Paragraphs and transitions: providing one main point per paragraph instead of mixing ideas, using strong topic sentences and smooth transitions.
(The information to use)
Paragraphs for the most parts have been good but I've struggled with transitioning to a new paragraph. Otherwise, I don't really mix ideas when I have a certain topic in mind for a paragraph.
b. Sentences: using sentence-combining skills and different types of sentences for effect.
(The information to use)
This has been somewhat rocky for me just because of the word requirements. I've been trying my best at it but I have let a few sentences slide just so I've been able to reach the word requirements.
c. Word choice: carefully choosing the best words, using appropriate diction.
(The information to use)
I feel like my wording has been good most of the course except for the second essay (proposal essay). I'm not really sure why I struggled so much with the essay. For the most part my word choice has been decent.
Write in complete sentences, and provide specific examples to illustrate your discussion. The essay must be between 500-750 words.
Write 5 paragraphs please.
Paragraph 1:
Introduction
Paragraph 2:
A. Paragraphs and transitions: providing one main point per paragraph instead of mixing ideas, using strong topic sentences and smooth transitions.
Paragraph 3:
B. Sentences: using sentence-combining skills and different types of sentences for effect.
Paragraph 4:
C Word choice: carefully choosing the best words, using appropriate diction.
Paragraph 5:
Conclusion
NOOOOOOOOOO PLAGIARISM!!!!!!!!!!!!
· APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to the current APA style and formatting. See
Evidence and APA.
· Number of resources: Minimum of 6 scholarly sources. Distinguished submissions will likely exceed this number.
· Length of paper: 6–8 typed, double-spaced pages. Additionally, a title page and references page.
· Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.
[removed]
Undergraduate Pathways ENG1105
ESSAY EXAM RUBRIC QUESTION #____ Name:______________________
CONTENT “A” PAPER “B” PAPER “C” PAPER “D/F” PAPER
Addressing Type
of Essay Question
Accurately identifies the essay
terms being used in the question;
designs answer that specifically
addresses the question; precisely
and lucidly discusses the subject
under the terms for examination
Definite recognition the essay terms
being used in the question; designs an
answer which addresses the terms;
correctly discusses the subject under
the terms for examin.
Number of pages 12 Deadline 42 HoursInstructions This ass.docx
Number of pages: 12
Deadline: 42 Hours
Instructions: This assignment includes several different sections and number of pages for each. I've given specific details in the attachment
All instructions/details/guidelines, as outlined and given in the other document, must be followed and adhered to
Paper written must meet all the requirements and parts given/outlined in the other document
Choose a grade level and social studies topic with supporting standards and plan a lesson to present in the classroom. Include grade-level appropriate activities that encourage active student engagement.
Address the following in your lesson plan:
1. Multiple intelligences
2. Authentic literature
3. Depth of Knowledge
4. Assessment of objective- Use three formative assessments during the lesson and one summative assessment at the end.
Teach your social studies lesson to a classroom of students.
In an essay of 1,000-1,250-words, reflect on the lesson and content.
Cite at least four references from educational journals and academic websites to support your teaching strategies.
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less Than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
25.0 %Lesson Plan
The lesson plan is missing many of the required components. The activities are missing, weak, or incomplete. Activities and assessments are not grade appropriate.
The lesson plan consists of most of the required components. Attention to detail is minimal, underdeveloped, or inappropriate for teaching. Activities and assessments are mostly grade appropriate.
The lesson plan consists of all the required components. Activities and assessments are appropriate for grade level and encourage participation.
All lesson plan components are addressed. The thinking skills and activities are thoughtfully developed and provide meaningful practice with familiar text. The activities are fun, interactive, and creative.
All lesson components are addressed. Exceptionally organized activities that create multiple and meaningful opportunities to practice. Activities are engaging.
45.0 %Reflection Essay
Content is incomplete and omits most of the requirements stated in the assignment’s criteria. Major points are irrelevant to the assignment. No outside sources were used to support major points.
Content is incomplete or omits some requirements stated in the assignment’s criteria. Major points are not clear and/or persuasive. No outside sources were used to support major points.
Content addresses most of the issues stated in the assignment’s criteria. Major points are addressed. Research is evident.
Content is comprehensive, accurate, and definitions are clearly stated. Major points are stated clearly and are supported. Research is adequate, up-to-date, relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment’s criteria. At least two relevant academic sources were cited.
Content is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive; definitions are clearly stated..
Masters Level Grading Rubric For Assessment of Report1-4 Scal
Masters Level Grading Rubric For Assessment of Report
1-4 Scale
Weight
Student Score
1
2
3
4
Percentage Score
0 to 59
59-68
69-71
72-75
76-79
80-84
85-89
90-100
Grades
F
C
B-
B
B+
A-
A
A+
Mastery Level
Beginning
Developing
Competent
Mastery
Standard Level
Below Standard
Approaching Standard
At Standard
Exceeds Standard
Subject Matter
50
Problem, Background
Problem statement is poorly crafted or missing or is misstated
Problem statement is not well-crafted but is acceptable
Problem statement is reasonably well-crafted and is specific to the issue
Problem statement is well-crafted, specific and represents a novel outlook on the issue
Discussion of Findings
Discussion is incorrect
correct, missing many of the pros with little or no discussion of negatives
Discussion is inadequately
correct, missing some of the pros and most or all of the cons
Discussion is correct, taking into account most of the pros and cons and represents a solid level of research
Discussion is complete and correct, taking into account pros and cons and represents a full level of research with novel conclusions
Managerial Recommendation
Recommendations are not supported
and demonstrat little or no understanding of problem or the consequences of implementation
Recommendations are inadequately supported
and do not represent reasonable understanding of problem or the consequences of implementation, with alternate solution available
Recommendations are adequately supported and represents reasonable understanding of problem, some of the consequences of implementation and may have and alternate solution available
Recommendations are fully supported and represents superior understanding of problem, consequences of implementation and has alternate solutions available
Professionalism
Student unable or nearly unable to work independently
and did not successfully meet project deadlines needing constant feedback/help, unresponsive to written/verbal feedback
Student had problems working independently
and had problems successfully meeting project deadlines needing significant feedback/help, not fully responsive to written/verbal feedback
Student worked mostly independently and met most project deadlines needing some feedback/help, mostly responsive to written/verbal feedback
Student worked independently and met all project deadlines striking an exceptional balance between working independently but asking for necessary feedback/help while exceptionally responsive to written/verbal feedback
References
References are not appropriate to the subject matter or are missing
References are not fully
appropriate to the subject matter
References are timely and appropriate to the subject matter
References represent a complete literature survey are timely and appropriate to the subject matter
Tables/Charts
Tables, charts and other media
poorly support the presentation of the material of the report or are not present when they would be of value
Tables, charts and o ...
Masters Level Grading Rubric For Assessment of Report1-4 Scal
Masters Level Grading Rubric For Assessment of Report
1-4 Scale
Weight
Student Score
1
2
3
4
Percentage Score
0 to 59
59-68
69-71
72-75
76-79
80-84
85-89
90-100
Grades
F
C
B-
B
B+
A-
A
A+
Mastery Level
Beginning
Developing
Competent
Mastery
Standard Level
Below Standard
Approaching Standard
At Standard
Exceeds Standard
Subject Matter
50
Problem, Background
Problem statement is poorly crafted or missing or is misstated
Problem statement is not well-crafted but is acceptable
Problem statement is reasonably well-crafted and is specific to the issue
Problem statement is well-crafted, specific and represents a novel outlook on the issue
Discussion of Findings
Discussion is incorrect
correct, missing many of the pros with little or no discussion of negatives
Discussion is inadequately
correct, missing some of the pros and most or all of the cons
Discussion is correct, taking into account most of the pros and cons and represents a solid level of research
Discussion is complete and correct, taking into account pros and cons and represents a full level of research with novel conclusions
Managerial Recommendation
Recommendations are not supported
and demonstrat little or no understanding of problem or the consequences of implementation
Recommendations are inadequately supported
and do not represent reasonable understanding of problem or the consequences of implementation, with alternate solution available
Recommendations are adequately supported and represents reasonable understanding of problem, some of the consequences of implementation and may have and alternate solution available
Recommendations are fully supported and represents superior understanding of problem, consequences of implementation and has alternate solutions available
Professionalism
Student unable or nearly unable to work independently
and did not successfully meet project deadlines needing constant feedback/help, unresponsive to written/verbal feedback
Student had problems working independently
and had problems successfully meeting project deadlines needing significant feedback/help, not fully responsive to written/verbal feedback
Student worked mostly independently and met most project deadlines needing some feedback/help, mostly responsive to written/verbal feedback
Student worked independently and met all project deadlines striking an exceptional balance between working independently but asking for necessary feedback/help while exceptionally responsive to written/verbal feedback
References
References are not appropriate to the subject matter or are missing
References are not fully
appropriate to the subject matter
References are timely and appropriate to the subject matter
References represent a complete literature survey are timely and appropriate to the subject matter
Tables/Charts
Tables, charts and other media
poorly support the presentation of the material of the report or are not present when they would be of value
Tables, charts and o ...
CategoryExceeds Standard AMeets Standard BBelow Standard .docx
Category
Exceeds Standard: A
Meets Standard: B
Below Standard: C
Does not meet Standard: F
Reflect personal learning in concert experience
Shows great depth of knowledge and learning, reveals feelings and thoughts, abstract ideas reflected through use of specific details.
Relates learning with research and project, personal and general reflections included, uses concrete language.
Does not go deeply into the reflection of learning, generalizations and limited insight, uses some detail.
Little or no explanation or reflection on learning, no or few details to support reflection.
Evidence
All claims and statements are backed up with concrete evidence
Most claims and statements are backed up with concrete evidence
Claims are vaguely backed up with evidence
Little or no evidence presented
Voice
Writing appropriate and engaging for audience
Writing appropriate for audience
Writing unclear for audience
Writing unsuitable for audience
Organization- Structural Development of the Idea
Writer demonstrates logical and subtle sequencing of ideas through well- developed paragraphs; transitions are used to enhance organization. Includes engaging introduction and conclusion
Paragraph development present but not perfected. Introduction and Conclusion present
Hazy organization; organization of ideas not fully developed. Introduction and conclusion vague, dull.
No evidence of structure or organization, conclusion or introduction.
Mechanics
No errors in punctuation, capitalization and spelling. No contractions
Almost no errors in punctuation, capitalization and spelling. Some contractions.
Many errors in punctuation, capitalization and spelling. Many contractions.
Numerous and distracting errors in punctuation, capitalization and spelling. Numerous Contractions.
Usage
No errors in sentence structure, flow and word usage
Few errors in sentence structure, flow and word usage
Many errors in sentence structure, flow and word usage
Numerous and distracting errors in sentence structure and word usage.
Appearance
Creative and attractive title; clear font and formatting; header with name, date; bibliography/citation list (if needed)
Title; clear font and formatting; header with name, date; bibliography/citation list (if needed)
One to two elements missing
Multiple elements missing
Ability to incorporate feedback (if constructive feedback is received)
Constructive feedback successfully incorporated into revised paper
Constructive feedback mostly successfully incorporated into revised paper
Constructive feedback largely ignored
Constructive feedback completely ignored
Academic Honesty
No plagiarism or collusion with other students appears. Citations are properly formatted in MLA or APA style.
Plagiarism of any kind: AUTOMATIC FAILURE OF ASSIGNMENT
...
Strategic Management Course The report should includ.docx
Strategic Management Course
The report should include the following elements in clear specific points:
1. State organization’s vision, mission and goals/objectives. Critically analyze the vision and mission as discussed in the class
2. Identify targeted market segment and customers or people the organization provide services/product to.
3. What type of products and/or services does the organization provide?
4. What is the philosophy in producing the above goods and/or services?
5. Using the Analysis matrices perform a stage-wise analysis by creating metrices for the organization.
6. From the above mentioned metrices analysis, critically identify which competitive or business strategy is considered in order
to reach your vision and goals?
Must include a PowerPoint presentation and written report, which includes:
(1) An official cover-page/slide.
(2) Introduction identifying the chosen topic and its importance (Executive Summery).
(3) A background of the chosen organization/business, and its industry.
(4) Discussion of the main 6 points mentioned above. The arguments should be based on what you have learnt in the course.
(5) Include a Conclusion which provides the organization’s way forward strategy.
General guidelines:
1- The written report should be between 2000-4000 words max.
2- Use both primary and secondary sources to collect data and information to build your report & presentation.
3- The PowerPoint presentation should take no longer than 15 mins, followed by 10 mins for questions.
4- Make sure to include visual aids such as graphs, tables, diagrams and/or pictures to highlight your points clearly, both in the
report and in the PowerPoint presentation.
5- Writing Guidelines: Paper size: A4, Line Spacing: 1.15, Margins: Normal all sides, Font: Times New Roman, Font Size: 12
for text and 14 for heading.
6- Your report and slides should be grammatically correct, well punctuated, clear, concise, neatly presented, and easy to read.
Literature Review Rubric Name: ___________________________ Date: ___________________ Score: __________________
Category Exceeds Standard Meets Standard Nearly Meets Standard Does not meet standard
Title Page Title, Your name, Course
Name, Date,
Instructor’s name,
Institution
All relevant parts of the
title page are included.
The title is appropriate but
is not be very concise
Some needed elements
are missing.
The title page is either
missing or contains
inaccuracies. The title
page does not follow APA
style.
Introduction Clearly and concisely
describes topic and its
importance, why the topic
was chosen, and questions
to be answered.
Describes topic and its
importance; fails to
describe key questions
Introduction describes the
topic and its importance
ambiguously.
Introduction is incomplete
and/or nonfocused. Does
not adequately convey
topic.
Review of Literature Succinctly summarizes .
PSYC 221Book Report Grading RubricStudent _____________.docx
PSYC 221
Book Report Grading Rubric
Student: _______________________________
20
17.8
15.8
13.8
11.8
0
Structure and Organization
Clear introduction and strong subject evidence; clear and appropriate transitions; appropriate paragraphing; logical, strong conclusion rising from content.
Generally clear
introduction and focused; generally clear and appropriate transitions; mostly appropriate paragraphing; adequate conclusion – relates to content but lacks objectivity or is vague.
Adequate introduction; unclear; adequate transitions; reader can follow what is being said, but the paper’s overall organization is choppy; adequate paragraphs; conclusion is simplistic.
Weak introduction; weak transitions; main points can be ascertained, but difficult to follow what is being said; weak and long paragraphing; conclusion repeats introduction .
Weak introduction and does not draw reader’s interest; little or no transitions; organization is disjointed and haphazard; paragraphs are weak; lacks conclusion.
No assignment was turned in.
Content
Assignment parameters (length 6–7 pages, subject, objectives) are observed;
focus is clear and coherent (good sense of audience); obvious understanding of subject; orderly development; conclusion/reflection are clearly supported and/or illustrated
Assignment parameters (length 4–5 pages, subject, objectives) are observed; focus is generally clear and coherent (general sense of audience); good understanding of subject; adequate development; orderly, but stiff, choppy progression of evidence
Assignment parameters (length 2–3 pages, subject, objectives) not clearly observed; mostly focused (some sense of audience); thoughts randomly organized and presented; conclusions/reflection weakly supported and/or illustrated
Inadequate or minimal observance of assignment length, subject and objectives; weakly focused (little sense of audience); unclear progression of ideas; conclusions/reflection weakly supported and/or illustrated
Inadequate length; objectives of assignment not met; unfocused; little or no sense of audience; serious and persistent errors in organization and structure; lacks understanding of subject; disorganized; does not prove point, if one can be discerned
No assignment was turned in.
Grammar and Mechanics
Sentence fluency coherent, unified, varied; sentence structure complete; correct spelling, punctuation, capitalization; varied diction, word choices
Sentence fluency correct, varied; Minor errors in structure (fragments, run-ons); correct spelling, punctuation, capitalization; limited diction, word choices
Relatively few errors in sentence fluency; multiple fragments/run-ons, poor spelling, punctuation, and capitalization; limited diction, uses trite words, slang, and contractions
Significant errors in sentence fluency and structure, spelling, punctuation and capitalization; diction weak or inappropriate
Serious and persistent errors in: sentence fluency, sentence structure, spelling, ...
A. InstructionsRemember the word argument” does not mean a fi.docx
A. Instructions
Remember the word “argument” does not mean a fight in a writing context. An academic argument is more like a thoughtful conversation between two people with differing viewpoints on a debatable issue. However, you are required to take a position on one side of the issue.
Your submission must include an APA style reference page following the essay. In your research, you will need 2-4 credible primary or secondary sources to use as support in your essay.
On a separate page, below your reference page, include thoughtful answers to the Think About Your Writing questions. References and Think About Your Writing questions are NOT included in the word count for this essay.
B. Think About Your Writing
Below your reference page, include answers to all of the following reflection questions.
1. What have you learned about how to present a strong argument? How could/will you apply this knowledge in your professional or everyday life (3-4 sentences)?Sophia says: Think about the specific skills and techniques that you used while developing and writing your essay. What tools will you take with you from this experience?
2. Consider the English Composition I course as a whole. What have you learned about yourself as a writer (5-6 sentences)?Sophia says: What did you learn that surprised you? Is there anything that you have struggled with in the past that you now feel more confident about?
C. Argumentative Essay Guidelines
Refer to the checklist below throughout the writing process. Do not submit your research essay until it meets these guidelines. Print this checklist!
Argumentative Topic and Thesis Statement
❒ Have you included a thesis that takes a clear, specific position on one side of a debatable issue?
· If you'd like to have your thesis statement reviewed prior to submitting your full essay, you may email your thesis to [email protected] with "Working Thesis" in the subject line.*Argument Development
❒ Are all of the details relevant to the purpose of your essay?
❒ Is the argument supported using rhetorical appeals and source material?
❒ Is your essay 4-6 pages (approximately 1000-1500 words)? If not, which details do you need to add or delete?Research
❒ Have you cited outside sources effectively using quotation, summary, or paraphrase?
❒ Are the sources incorporated smoothly, providing the reader with signal phrases and context for the source information?
❒ Have you referenced a range of 2-4 credible sources?
❒ Have you included an APA style reference page below your essay?Organization and Flow
❒ Is there an introduction, conclusion, adequate body paragraphs, and a counterargument?
❒ Is the argument presented in a logical order and easy for the reader to follow?
❒ Are there transitions within and between paragraphs?Style
❒ Are the word choices accurate and effective?
❒ Are the sentence structures varied?Conventions and Formatting
❒ Have you properly cited your sources according to APA style guidelines?
❒ Have you double-checked for ...
WarningYou do not have permissions to perform this activityA.docx
Warning
You do not have permissions to perform this activity
Assignment
Week 10 | Diversity in the Health Care Organization
Details:
1) Providers must learn new tools to eliminate disparities, build trust with patients, and understand how international biases and pre-established stereotypes affect quality of care. Write a paper (1,000-1,250 words) that identifies and defines various tools and measurements that can be used to measure the effectiveness of diversity programs and policies established by the organization.
2) Address how each of the following must be considered when considering how to implement an environment of diversity:
a) Government regulations.
b) Social pressures.
c) Industry and company ethical codes.
d) Tension between personal standards and the goals of the organization.
3) Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
4) This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
Top of Form
Please Note: Assignment will not be submitted to the faculty member until the "Submit" button under "Final Submission" is clicked.
New Attempt
Bottom of Form
Title
Attached Documents
Turnitin Report
Similarity Index
Final Submission
Click 'New Attempt' to start assignment or attach documents
Error Details
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
Top of Form
Apply Rubrics
Addressing Diversity
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
100.0 %Content
40.0 %In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
Does not demonstrate understanding of the issues surrounding diversity, including the implications. Does not demonstrate critical thinking and analysis of the situation, and does not develop effective answers to the questions, with rationale.
Demonstrates only minimal understanding diversity. Demonstrates only minimal abilities for critical thinking and analysis of the case study, and develops weak answers to the questions, with minimal rationale
Demonstrates knowledge of issues surrounding diversity, but has some slight misunderstanding of the implications. Provides a basic idea of critical thinking and analysis for the questions, answers, and rationale. Does not include examples or descriptions.
Demonstrates acceptable knowledge of the issues surrounding diversity (in your own words). Develops an acceptable response and rationale for it. Utilizes some examples.
Demonstrates thorough knowledge of the issues surrounding diversity and their implications. Clearly answers the questions and develops a very strong rationale. Introduces appropri.
ENG130 – Literature and Composition Unit 4 Assignment .docx
ENG130 – Literature and Composition
Unit 4 Assignment
Essay ENG 130:
Developing an Argument
Due: 11:59 PM EST Sunday of Unit 4.
Length and format: 2-3 pages. The title page and reference page are also required, but they
should not be factored into the 2-3 page length of the essay. It should also be double
spaced, written in Times New Roman, and in 12 point font. Essay should conform to APA
formatting and citation style.
Instructions:
By definition, faith is believing in something without actually requiring concrete proof.
Conformity is abiding by certain rules, laws, and other societal norms. A person who
conforms often must follow specific rules.
The authors of both “Salvation” and “The Five Glorious Mysteries” create stories that deal
with the themes of faith and conformity. However, the characters’ words and actions do not
actually always add up to their viewpoint on faith and conformity. What does it mean to
speak one way but act in another manner? Select one of the essays from this unit, and form
an argument about what the author is trying to say about actions vs. words.
The requirements for Essay 4 are:
• Describe the effectiveness of the author’s argument.
o Select textual evidence from the essay to support your position.
• Analyze the examples used in the author’s essay.
o Develop topics that act to prove your argument.
o Support your argument with specific textual evidence.
• Include an APA title page.
• Use the objective voice, avoiding personal pronouns such as “I,” “you,” “we,” etc.
• Use APA format for in-text citations and References when using outside sources and
textual evidence.
Students: Be sure to read the criteria, by which your paper/project will be
evaluated, before you write, and again after you write.
Argument Rubric
0-4 5-10 11-15 16-20
Meets
Assignment
Requirements
Few assignment
requirements are
met.
Some
assignment
requirements
are met.
Most
assignment
requirements
are met.
Many to all
assignment
requirements
are fully met.
Thesis
Statement
(Controlling
Idea)
Thesis is
confusing, vague
or unclear.
Thesis is loosely
related to the
paper or not
present.
Thesis is
attempted with
little relation to
the overall topic.
Some
supporting
details missing.
Thesis is
present and
relates to the
majority of the
paper.
Thesis is
organized and
focused on the
paper. It
includes all
main points and
uses active
voice to state
the position.
Introduction Background
details are a
random
collection of
information,
unclear, or not
related to the
topic. There may
be no clear
introduction and
background
details.
Introduction
attempted
explains the
background, but
may lack detail.
Introduction
explains the
background,
including an
overview of the
essay’s main
points.
Introduction
uses interesting
anecdotes,
questions, or
other
information to
build interest.
Many to a ...
Similar to FYS Grading Rubric for Writing Assignment A 95 B .docx (20)
Assignment RubricUnit 6 assignment grading rubric. Instructors En.docx
Assignment RubricUnit 6 assignment grading rubric. Instructors En.docx
ENG-106 Rubric Cause and Effect Argument Criteria Value1 .docx
ENG-106 Rubric Cause and Effect Argument Criteria Value1 .docx
ENG-106 Rubric Definition Argument Criteria Value1 Unsati.docx
ENG-106 Rubric Definition Argument Criteria Value1 Unsati.docx
Top of FormBenchmark - Research Critique Part 1 1Unsatisfa.docx
Top of FormBenchmark - Research Critique Part 1 1Unsatisfa.docx
Collaborate Summary RubricCollaborate Summary RubricCriteria0 Poin.docx
Collaborate Summary RubricCollaborate Summary RubricCriteria0 Poin.docx
Evaluate your improvements made and weaknesses that still persist .docx
Evaluate your improvements made and weaknesses that still persist .docx
Number of pages 12 Deadline 42 HoursInstructions This ass.docx
Number of pages 12 Deadline 42 HoursInstructions This ass.docx
Masters Level Grading Rubric For Assessment of Report1-4 Scal
Masters Level Grading Rubric For Assessment of Report1-4 Scal
Masters Level Grading Rubric For Assessment of Report1-4 Scal
Masters Level Grading Rubric For Assessment of Report1-4 Scal
CategoryExceeds Standard AMeets Standard BBelow Standard .docx
CategoryExceeds Standard AMeets Standard BBelow Standard .docx
Strategic Management Course The report should includ.docx
Strategic Management Course The report should includ.docx
PSYC 221Book Report Grading RubricStudent _____________.docx
PSYC 221Book Report Grading RubricStudent _____________.docx
A. InstructionsRemember the word argument” does not mean a fi.docx
A. InstructionsRemember the word argument” does not mean a fi.docx
WarningYou do not have permissions to perform this activityA.docx
WarningYou do not have permissions to perform this activityA.docx
ENG130 – Literature and Composition Unit 4 Assignment .docx
ENG130 – Literature and Composition Unit 4 Assignment .docx
More from hanneloremccaffery
Explain how firms can benefit from forecastingexchange rates .docx
Explain how firms can benefit from forecasting
exchange rates
Describe the common techniques used for
forecasting
Explain how forecasting performance can be
evaluated
explain how interval forecasts can be applied
APA format, minimum 3 sources
Paper will be a minimum of 650 and a maximum of 900 words.
(This includes title section, content, and references…in other
words the entire paper)
.
•POL201 •Discussions •Week 5 - DiscussionVoter and Voter Tu.docx
• POL201 • Discussions • Week 5 - Discussion
Voter and Voter Turnout
Prepare: Prior to completing this discussion question, review Chapters 10, 11, and 12 in American Government and review Week Five Instructor Guidance. Also read the following articles: How Voter ID Laws Are Being Used to Disenfranchise Minorities and the Poor (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site., Fraught with Fraud (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site., and Proof at the Polls (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
Reflect: The U.S. has one of the lowest voter turnout rates among modern democratic political systems. One study ranks the U.S. 120th on a list of 169 nations compared on voter turnout (Pintor, Gratschew, & Sullivan, 2002). During the last decade, many initiatives have been undertaken to increase voter participation, yet concerns about the possibility of election fraud have also increased. Additionally, some political interests feel threatened by the increase in turnout among some traditionally low-turnout ethnic minorities. Several states have recently passed legislation imposing new registration and identification requirements. This has sparked debate about whether these are tactics intended to suppress turnout or to prevent fraud. Think about the media’s role in the election process and how both mass media and social media can impact the election process.
Write: In your initial post, summarize recent developments in several states enacting voter ID laws. Analyze and describe the pros and cons on both sides of the debate about these laws. Is voter fraud a major problem for our democracy or are some groups trying to make it harder for some segments of society to vote? What impact has the media (mass and social) had in influencing public opinion regarding voter ID laws? Draw your own conclusion about the debate over voter ID laws and justify your conclusions with facts and persuasive reasoning. Fully respond to all parts of the prompt and write your response in your own words. Your initial post must be at least 300 words. Support your position with at least two of the assigned resources required for this discussion, and/or peer reviewed scholarly sources obtained through the AU Library databases. Include APA in-text citations (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. in the body of your post and full citations on the references list (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. at the end. Support your position with APA citations from two or more of the assigned resources required for this discussion. Please be sure that you demonstrate understanding of these resources, integrate them into your argument, and cite them properly.
.
•No less than 4 pages causal argument researched essay •In.docx
•
No less than 4 pages causal argument researched essay
•
Includes an interview with an expert from a university
•
Includes survey question with students concerning the topic
•
Includes arguments from official sources from the library
.
•Focus on two or three things in the Mesopotamian andor Ovids ac.docx
•Focus on two or three things in the Mesopotamian and/or Ovid's account of creation that differ from Genesis. How do they differ? What is the significance of these differences?
•Focus on two or three things in the Mesopotamian and/or
Ovid's account of the flood that differ from Genesis. How do they differ? What is the significance of these differences
.
•Langbein, L. (2012). Public program evaluation A statistical guide.docx
•Langbein, L. (2012). Public program evaluation: A statistical guide (2nd ed.). Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe. ◦Chapter 7, “Designing Useful Surveys for Evaluation” (pp. 209–238)
•McDavid, J. C., Huse, I., & Hawthorn, L. R. L. (2013). Program evaluation and performance measurement: An introduction to practice (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. ◦Chapter 4, “Measurement for Program Evaluation and Performance Monitoring” (pp. 145–185)
•Geddes, B. (1990). How the cases you choose affect the answers you get: Selection bias in comparative politics. Political Analysis, 2(1), 131–150. Retrieved from http://www.uky.edu/~clthyn2/PS671/Geddes_1990PA.pdf
•Levitt, S., & List, J. (2009). Was there really a Hawthorne effect at the Hawthorne plant? An analysis of the original illumination experiments. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w15016.pdf
•Urban Institute. (2014). Outcome indicators project. Retrieved from http://www.urban.org/center/cnp/projects/outcomeindicators.cfm
•Bamberger, M. (2010). Reconstructuring baseline data for impact evaluation and results measurement. Retrieved from http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTPOVERTY/Resources/335642-1276521901256/premnoteME4.pdf
•Parnaby, P. (2006). Evaluation through surveys [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://www.idea.org/blog/2006/04/01/evaluation-through-surveys/
•Rutgers, New Jersey Agricultural Experiment Station. (2014). Developing a survey instrument. Retrieved from http://njaes.rutgers.edu/evaluation/resources/survey-instrument.asp
•MEASURE Evaluation. (n.d.). Secondary analysis of data. Retrieved February 24, 2015, from http://www.cpc.unc.edu/measure/our-work/secondary-analysis/secondary-analysis-of-data
•Zeitlin, A. (2014). Sampling and sample size [PowerPoint slides]. Retrieved from http://www.povertyactionlab.org/sites/default/files/2.%20Sampling%20and%20Sample%20Size_AFZ3.pdf
Now that you have thought through a logical model or framework for your Final Project, it is time to develop preliminary input, output, and outcome indicators. For this Assignment, use the guidelines from the Urban Institute resource and consult relevant Optional Resources from this week.
Submit a 2- to 3-page paper which describes your input, output, and outcome program indicators, including the following:
•Describe the variables and the data you will be using.
•Provide a realistic discussion of the availability of research data.
•Provide an analysis of intended data collection strategies.
◦If a sample or sample survey will be used, discuss the sampling frame or the sampling strategy you intend to use.
.
•Chapter 10 Do you think it is possible for an outsider to accura.docx
•Chapter 10: Do you think it is possible for an outsider to accurately discern about the underlying cultural values of an organization by analyzing symbols, ceremonies, dress, or other observable aspects of culture in comparison to an insider with several years of work experience? Select a percentage (e.g., 10%, 70%, etc.) and explain your reasoning.
•Chapter 11: A noted organization theorist once said, "Pressure for change originates in the environment. Pressure for stability originates within the organization." Do you agree?
•Chapter 12: If managers frequently use experience and intuition to make complex, non-programmed decisions, how do they apply evidence-based management (which seems to suggest that managers should rely on facts and data)?
•Chapter 13: In a rapidly changing organization, are decisions more likely to be made using the rational or political model of organization?
•What biblical implications should be included/addressed?
•How can/should a biblical worldview be applied?
Group Discussion Board Forum Thread Grading Rubric
Criteria
Points Possible
Points Earned
Thread
0 to 30 points
All questions associated with Part 1 are provided in a thread.
At least 4 peer-reviewed references are included in the thread.
The thread is 1200 words.
The thread is posted by the stated deadline.
Spelling and grammar are correct.
Sentences are complete, clear, and concise.
Total
.
· Bakit Di gaanong kaganda ang pagturo sa UST sa panahon.docx
·
Bakit
Di gaanong kaganda ang pagturo sa UST sa panahon ni Jose Rizal
·
bakit
Merong diskriminasyon; minamaliit ang mga Pilipinosa panahon ni Jose Rizal
·
bakit
Galit sa kay Jose Rizal ang mga Dominikano dahil sa pagtatatag ng Companerismo (Fraternity)
·
bakit
Gustong gamutin ni Jose Rizal ang ina niya
.
·YOUR INDIVIDUAL PAPER IS ARGUMENTATIVE OR POSITIONAL(Heal.docx
·
YOUR INDIVIDUAL PAPER IS ARGUMENTATIVE OR POSITIONAL
(Healthcare Information Technology)
THIS is NOT and information paper so please read this carefully
Individual Writing Assignment
This Individual Writing Assignment is worth 20 points, and it is due at the end of Week 5.
The purposes of this assignment are to a) help you effectively use research resources through library data bases and search engines to complete course requirements; b) improve your critical thinking skills, and c) develop your effectiveness in writing about topics relevant to course objectives and healthcare information systems. The paper explores, in greater detail than the required readings and class discussion, any healthcare information system topic identified in the course text or syllabus. Your job is to select a current issue in healthcare information systems, provide the necessary background and your position, along with a conclusion and future direction. I encourage you to select a subject in which you have interest and approach this assignment as a potential publishable work.
Position Paper
Your final paper is 15 pages double-spaced (excluding the executive summary, footnotes, and references) with a 10 or 12 point font. Tables, graphics, and diagrams must be placed in the paper as attachments. They do not count in the page length. This is a guide to help you organize your content and what is expected in each section. The page counts are suggested, however, where they have a limit, that must be adhered to.
·
Cover Page:
APA Style (1 Page, not included in page count)
·
Table of Contents:
(not included in page count)
·
Executive Summary:
Bottom line up front (1 page, no more)
·
Introduction
: (1/2 to 1 page)
·
Background
: Information on the topic that provides context so readers can understand the background leading into your statement and analysis of the issue (up to 2 pages, no more)
·
Analysis of the issue
: This is the problem you see with the current state of your topic supported by evidence and literature that brings validity to the issue or problem you are stating exists. Then describe the factors contributing to the issue /problem broken down by (2-3 pages)
People
Processes
Technology
·
Position
: Now that the reader understands the problem broken down by people, process, and technology, provide a clear statement of what your position is on the issue and why. (1/2 to 1 page)
·
Rationale
: Now that the reader clearly understands your position and why you will detail your position with supporting evidence and literature to persuade the reader your position is the most valid. You should address opposing views with counter arguments here also. Your position should have evidence directly addressing the issues you stated above broken down by the same (3-4 pages)
People
Process
Technology
·
Recommendation
: Now that you have convinced the reader on your position being the best way forward, you need to provide 3-5 discrete recommen.
·Write a 750- to 1,Write a 750- to 1,200-word paper that.docx
·
Write
a 750- to 1,
Write
a 750- to 1,200-word paper that addresses the following:
Define religion.
Describe the theory of animism.
Explain the influence of religion on cultures.
Identify the seven major religions of the world.
Describe any four types of theism.
Format
your paper consistent with APA guidelines.
Include
a minimum of five references.
Limit
direct quotes to less than 10% of the total manuscript.
Criteria for grading
·
Introduction provides sufficient background on the topic and previews major points
·
Define religion
·
Describe the theory of animism
·
Explain the influence of religion on cultures (e.g., architecture, art, politics, social norms, etc.)
·
Identify the seven major religions of the world and provide one or two sentences about each
·
Describe any four types of theism (e.g., atheism, monotheism, ditheism, polytheism, pantheism, etc.) and provide an example of each
·
Conclusion
.
[Type here]Ok. This school makes me confused. The summary of t.docx
[Type here]
Ok. This school makes me confused. The summary of this week they posted like this:
SUMMARY:
This week introduced you to grand theories and middle-range theories that serve to articulate the voice of nursing within healthcare.
Here are the key points covered:
Grand theories are comparatively more abstract than middle-range theories since they are at a higher level of abstraction. Compared to grand theories, middle-range theories are made up of limited number of concepts that lend themselves to empirical testing. All theories help to explain human health behavior.
· Sister Callista Royï's adaptive model theory is built on the conceptual foundation of adaptation. It identifies the positive role that nursing plays in the promotion and enhancement of client adaptation to environments that facilitate the healing process.
· Leiningerï's culture care theory is pertinent in the current multicultural healthcare environment where nurses are exposed to diverse cultures.
· Penderï's health promotion and disease prevention theory can be called as a "direction setting exercise" for nursing professionals. It believes in fostering the spirit of health promotion and disease and risk reduction.
From the chapter, Models and Theories Focused on Nursing Goals and Functions, read the following:The Health Promotion Model: Nola J. Pender
From the chapter, Models and Theories Focused on a Systems Approach, read the following:
The Roy Adaptation Model
From the chapter, Models and Theories Focused on Culture, read the following:
Leininger's Cultural Care Diversity and Universality Theory and Model
SO, THAT IS WHY I ASSUMED THAT HAS TO BE ONE OF THEM (Pender, Roy Adaptaion or Leininger)
ANYWAY, I AM PUTTING INFORMATION TOGETHER.
Week 4 Chapter 17
Models and Theories Focused on Nursing Goals and Functions
The Health Promotion Model: Nola J. Pender
Background
Nola J. Pender was born in 1941 in Lansing, Michigan. She graduated in 1962 with a diploma in nursing. In 1964, Pender completed a bachelor’s of science in nursing at Michigan State University. By 1969, she had completed a doctor of philosophy in psychology and education. During this time in her career, Pender began looking at health and nursing in a broad way, including defining the goal of nursing care as optimal health.
In 1975, Pender published a model for preventive health behavior; her health promotion model first appeared in the first edition of the text Health Promotion in Nursing Practice in 1982. Pender’s health promotion model has its foundation in Albert Bandura’s (1977) social learning theory (which postulates that cognitive processes affect behavior change) and is influenced by Fishbein’s (1967) theory of reasoned action (which asserts that personal attitudes and social norms affect behavior).
Pender’s Health Promotion Model
McCullagh (2009) labeled Pender’s health promotion model as a middle-range integrative theory, and rightly so. Fawcett (2005) decisively presented the differenc.
© 2020 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplic.docx
© 2020 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Business Plan
• Provides a more specific and detailed
exploration of the venture’s goals and operations
with a clear path on how the venture will
succeed.
• A written document that details the proposed
venture:
• Describes the current status, expected needs, and
projected results of the new business.
• Demonstrates a clear picture of what the venture is,
where it is projected to go, and how the entrepreneur
proposes it will get there.
© 2020 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Benefits of a Business Plan (slide 1 of 2)
• For the Entrepreneur:
• Time, effort, research, and discipline to create a
formal plan forces the entrepreneur to view the
venture critically and objectively.
• Competitive, economic, and financial analyses
subject the venture to close scrutiny.
• For Outside Evaluators:
• Develops and examines operating strategies and
expected results.
• Provides a tool for use in communications with
outside financial sources.
© 2020 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Benefits of a Business Plan (slide 2 of 2)
• Specifically for the Financial Sources:
• Details the market potential and plans for securing a
share of that market.
• Shows the venture’s ability to service debt
or provide an adequate return on equity.
• Identifies critical risks and crucial events with
a discussion of contingency plans.
• Contains the necessary information for a thorough
business and financial evaluation.
• Assesses the entrepreneur’s managerial ability.
© 2020 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Developing a Well-Conceived Business Plan
• The Five-Minute Reading:
1. Determine the characteristics of the venture and its industry.
2. Determine the financial structure of the plan (amount of debt or
equity investment required).
3. Read the latest balance sheet (to determine liquidity, net worth,
and debt/equity).
4. Determine the quality of entrepreneurs in the venture
(sometimes the most important step).
5. Establish the unique feature in this venture (find out what is
different).
6. Read the entire plan lightly (this is when the entire package is
paged through for a casual look at graphs, charts, exhibits, and
other plan components).
© 2020 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Putting the Package Together
• Key Format Issues:
• Appearance
• Length
• The cover and title page
• The executive summary
• The table of contents
© 2020 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly access.
© 2016 Laureate Education, Inc. Page 1 of 3 RWRCOEL Prof.docx
© 2016 Laureate Education, Inc. Page 1 of 3
RWRCOEL Professional Dispositions
Professional Conduct
1. Ethical and Legal Conduct: The candidate demonstrates professionalism
as outlined by legal and ethical guidelines within the profession.
a. Demonstrates professional behavior as described in Walden’s Code of
Conduct
b. Demonstrates ethical behavior as described by professional codes of
ethics
2. Professional Obligations: The candidate meets professional obligations in
a responsible manner.
a. Maintains a strong record of attendance and punctuality, communicating in
advance the need for any absence or delay in meeting performance
expectations
b. Prepares for professional obligations and meets expected deadlines
© 2016 Laureate Education, Inc. Page 2 of 3
3. Professional Appearance and Demeanor: The candidate demonstrates
professional appearance and behaviors in the educational setting.
a. Maintains appropriate appearance through professional dress and
grooming
b. Approaches teaching and learning tasks with initiative, confidence, and
energy
c. Exhibits composure and self-control
d. Demonstrates flexibility in adapting to changing circumstances and
student needs
Professional Qualities
4. Professional Development/Growth: The candidate engages in ongoing
professional development and growth to improve professional practice.
a. Engages in continuous learning through participation in professional
development opportunities
b. Applies new ideas to professional practice based on existing data,
reflection, and intellectual curiosity
c. Engages in ongoing critical reflection of personal performance to improve
professional practice
5. Advocacy: The candidate advocates for fairness, equity, and social change
in the learning environment.
a. Displays empathy, fairness, persistence, problem-solving skills, and
appropriate risk-taking actions on behalf of others
b. Advocates for the social, emotional, physical, educational, behavioral, and
basic needs of others
c. Promotes positive social change to enhance educational opportunities and
promote student learning
6. Equity: The candidate demonstrates culturally responsive practices to
create an inclusive learning environment that is respectful of diverse
cultures, values, and beliefs of others.
a. Displays equitable treatment of others
i. Sets high expectations for all learners
© 2016 Laureate Education, Inc. Page 3 of 3
ii. Treats others with respect and dignity
iii. Recognizes individual differences in teaching and learning
b. Engages in culturally responsive practices in interactions with students,
families, colleagues, and communities
c. Creates learning environments that are inclusive; free of bias and
discrimination and respectful of diverse cultures, values, and beliefs
d. Engages families and other stakeholders in planning for individual success
Collabor.
© 2022 Post University, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Due Date.docx
© 2022 Post University, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
Due Date: Sunday at 11:59 pm EST
Points: 100
Overview:
Social histories are prepared to paint a comprehensive picture of a client’s situation and
relevant information. This information may come from referral sources, other providers,
and the client. For this assignment, you will be drafting a social history for your client,
Mr. Brown, from the Case Vignette.
Instructions:
Apply the information provided in the Case Vignette and prepare a social history that
addresses the following:
• Client information
• Presenting Problem
• Referral (Including source and reason)
• Medical History
• Personal/Family History
• Education
• Work History
• Personality and Habits
Requirements:
• Submit a Word document that includes a title page.
• Be sure to address each section fully. Each area of information can be broken
into sub-sections, listed with the appropriate heading.
• This is a professional report and should use formal language, complete
sentences, proper grammar and appropriate sentence structure.
Be sure to read the criteria below by which your work will be evaluated before
you write and again after you write.
Social History Assignment
HSV340 – Case Management
© 2022 Post University, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
Evaluation Rubric for Social History Assignment
CRITERIA Deficient Needs Improvement Proficient Exemplary
0 – 5 Points 6 – 7 points 8 – 9 points 10 points
Client
information
Section missing or
major details
missing.
Section addressed.
Some key details
missing.
Section addressed
in detail. Sub-
sections used with
headings when
appropriate. Minor
detail(s) missing.
Section addressed
in full detail. Sub-
sections used with
headings when
appropriate.
Presenting
Problem
Section missing or
major details
missing.
Section addressed.
Some key details
missing.
Section addressed
in detail. Sub-
sections used with
headings when
appropriate. Minor
detail(s) missing.
Section addressed
in full detail. Sub-
sections used with
headings when
appropriate.
Referral
(Including
source and
reason)
Section missing or
major details
missing.
Section addressed.
Some key details
missing.
Section addressed
in detail. Sub-
sections used with
headings when
appropriate. Minor
detail(s) missing.
Section addressed
in full detail. Sub-
sections used with
headings when
appropriate.
Medical History Section missing or
major details
missing.
Section addressed.
Some key details
missing.
Section addressed
in detail. Sub-
sections used with
headings when
appropriate. Minor
detail(s) missing.
Section addressed
in full detail. Sub-
sections used with
headings when
appropriate.
Personal/Family
History
Section missing or
major details
missing.
Section addressed.
Some key details
missing.
Section addressed
in detail. Sub-
sections used with
headings when
a.
{DiscriminationGENERAL DISCRIMINATI.docx
{
Discrimination
*
GENERAL DISCRIMINATION
+
RACIAL DISCRIMINATION
RELIGIOUS DISCRIMINATION
(on freedom of religion)
DISCRIMINATION ON SEXUAL ORIENTATION
(still weak protection)
GENDER DISCRIMINATION
(CEDAW)
TYPES OF DISCRIMINATION
NON-DISCRIMINATION in INT’L LAW
A. GENERAL DISCRIMINATION
Arts 1 & 2 Universal Declaration on Human Rights
Arts. 2 & 26 ICCPR
Art. 14 ECHR & Add. Protocol 12
B. RACIAL DISCRIMINATION
Int’l Convention against All Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD)
Art . 2: (1). Each State Party to the present Covenant undertakes to respect and to ensure to all individuals within its territory and subject to its jurisdiction the rights recognized in the present Covenant, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status.
(2). States to take the necessary steps to adopt laws and measures to give effect to art. 2;
(3). States to ensure effective remedy, determined by competent judicial, administrative or legislative authorities, or by any other competent authority and enforce such remedies.
Art. 26: non-discrimination before the law and equal protection by the law
ICCPR
*
Justification for differential treatment
General Comment 18 HRC
Not every differentiation of treatment will constitute discrimination:
if the criteria are reasonable and objective
and the aim is to achieve the purpose which is legitimate
ICCPR cont.
*
“Racial discrimination" shall mean any distinction, exclusion, restriction or preference based on race, colour, descent, or national or ethnic origin which has the purpose or effect of nullifying or impairing the recognition, enjoyment or exercise, on an equal footing, of human rights and fundamental freedoms in the political, economic, social, cultural or any other field of public life (art. 1)
States Parties particularly condemn racial segregation and apartheid and undertake to prevent, prohibit and eradicate all practices of this nature in territories under their jurisdiction (art. 3)
RACIAL DISCRIMINATION-
International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination
Direct discrimination: Indirect discrimination
Formal equality: Substantive equality
Discrimination in law: Discrimination in practice
Non-discrimination: negative protection
Equality: positive obligations -> special measures
Is there a hierarchy in the protection of discrimination?
Racial Discrimination (prohibition Jus Cogens);
gender based discrimination?
Religious-based discrimination??
Discrimination based on sexual orientation???
Discrimination (forms & grounds)
= Affirmative action/ positive action
Article 1.4 of ICERD:
Special measures taken for the sole purpose of securing adequate advancement of certain racial or ethnic groups or individuals requiring such protection as may be necessary in order to ensure such groups or in.
~UEER THEORY AND THE JEWISH QUESTI01 Daniel Boyarin, Da.docx
~UEER THEORY AND
TH'E JEWISH QUESTI01
Daniel Boyarin, Daniel Itzkovitz,
and Ann Pellegrini, Editors
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY PRESS
NEW YORK
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY PRESS
Publishers Since 1893
New York Chichester, Ulest Sussex
Copyright© 2003 Columbia University Press
All rights reserved
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Queer theory and the Jewish question I Daniel Boyarin,
Daniel Itzkovicz, and Ann Pellegrini, editors.
p. cm.-(Between meh-between women)
ISBN 0-231-11374-9 (cloth: alk. paper)-
ISBN 0-231-11375-7 (pbk.: olk. pape<)
1. Jewish gays. 2. Jewish lesbians. I. Boyarin,
Daniel. II. Itzkovitz, Daniel. III. Pellegrini, Ann
IV. Series.
HQ75.15.Q5 2003
305.892'4-dcll
2003048494
Casebound editions of Columbia University Press books
are printed on permanent and durable acid-free paper.
Printed in the United States of America
010987654321
p10987654321
Acknowledgments
Strange Bedfellows: An Introduction
Daniel Boyarin, Daniel ltzkovitz, and Ann Pellegrini
Category Crises: The Way of the Cross and the Jewish Star
Marjorie Garber
Epistemology of the Closet
Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick
Contents
ix
19
41
Queers Are Like Jews, Aren't They? Analogy and Alliance Politics 64
Janet R. Jakobsen
Freud, Bltiher, and the Secessio lnversa: Mannerbunde,
Homosexuality, and Freud's Theory of Cultural Formation
Jay Geller
Jew Boys, Queer Boys: Rhetorics of Antisemitism and
Homophobia in the Trial of Nathan "Babe" Leopoid Jr.
and Richard "Dickie" Loeb
Paul B. Franklin
Viva la Diva Citizenship: Post-Zionism and Gay Rights
Alisa Solomon
90
121
149
vii
Queers Are Like Jews, Aren't They? Analogy
and Alliance Politics
JANET R. JAKOBSEN
Queers are like Jews. Aren't they?
What does it mean to pose the Jewish question in relation to queer theo-
ry? Is there any one Jewish question? And does not the Jewish question also
pose the question of queer theory itself? What is the relationship berween
"Jewish" and "queee'? Does queer, after all, refer to the identity of those with
whom it is most commonly associated in the current milieu: homosexuals and
other sexual dissidents? Or does queer mean something, well, "different" than
that, different than a catch-all ca\egory with reference to sexuality? And if
queer refers to something else-to~ for example, that which is other, different,
odd, queer-what is its relation to the specific difference (queerness?)' of Jew-
ish? One can certainly imagine instances in which it would be quite queer to
be Jewish. But, if we simply take up the concept in this manner-that Jews
are the queers of this or that setting-does not all difference get colonized
into "queer"? And, doesn't the specter of sexual identity continue to haunt the
word queer, leaving sexuality as the fundamental difference? What if Jewish is
taken to mean something more than a specific difference? What of the impli-
cations of Jewishness beyond Jewish d.
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.Chapter Twelve.docx
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Chapter Twelve
Work: Occupational and Lifestyle Issues in Young and Middle Adulthood
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Introduction
What factors are attributed to job satisfaction?
What difficulties do middle-aged people face when they need to switch careers?
How do men and women differ regarding career choice?
How do parents juggle work and caring for children?
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
12.1 Occupational Selection and Development
Learning Objectives
How do people view work?
How do people choose their occupations?
What factors influence occupational development?
What is the relationship between job satisfaction and age?
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
The Meaning of Work, Part 1
Most people view work as a means for obtaining money and personal growth
Personal achievement is fulfilled through work based on whether or not meanings can be achieved
Developing self
Union with others
Expressing self
Serving others
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
The Meaning of Work, Part 2
Meaning-mission fit: the alignment between an executive’s personal intentions and the company’s mission
When aligned, executives care more about employees’ happiness, job satisfaction, and emotional well-being
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Occupational Choice Revisited, Part 1
Three theories on adults’ choice of work:
Career construction theory: people build careers through own actions that result from personal characteristics and the social context
Holland’s personality-type theory: people choose work based on the fit between their individual traits and occupational interests
Social cognitive career theory (SCCT): career choice is the result of the application of Bandura’s social cognitive theory, especially self-efficacy
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Occupational Choice Revisited, Part 2
Figure 12.1 The four-variable (paths 1–6) and six-variable (paths 1–13) versions of the SCCT
interest and choice models.
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Occupational Development, Part 1
Personal experiences affect people’s occupational goals
Goals may change due to changing interests, not having a good fit with the job, or the need for further education to advance
People with the talent and opportunity to achieve their goals often obtain them
Young adults usually modify career expectations at least once
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Occupational Development, Part 2
Millennials tend to change jobs more often than in other generations
However, they generally have the same level of satisfaction
Reality shock: what is learned in the classroom does not carry over to the real world, and does not represent all a person needs to know
Best addressed through internships and practicum experiences
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Occupational Development, Part 3
Mentor/executive coach: part teach.
`HISTORY 252AEarly Modern Europe from 1500 to 1815Dr. Burton .docx
`HISTORY 252A
Early Modern Europe from 1500 to 1815
Dr. Burton Van Name Edwards (Van)
Tuesday – Thursday 3:30-4:45
Unistructure 247
Third Paper Assignment
Due Tuesday, December 13th
The third paper will be based on a book in the list at the end of the syllabus. These works are generally works of literature, with some concerned with philosophy or politics. The student’s task will be to show how the chosen work reflects or shows the influence of conditions and events in Europe that were operating at the time of the writing of the work. This is not a book report. I am not interested in plots or descriptions of the general argument of a given work. Instead, I am looking for an analysis of specific sections of the chosen work that may illuminate social and economic attitudes or contemporaneous conditions.
The paper should be 7-8 pages long.
You will be expected to give a 5-10 minute oral report based on your finding in the third paper. This oral report will be a significant part of your class participation grade.
.
^ Acadumy of Management Journal2001. Vol. 44. No. 2. 219-237.docx
^ Acadumy of Management Journal
2001. Vol. 44. No. 2. 219-237.
A SOCIAL CAPITAL THEORY OF CAREER SUCCESS
SCOTT E. SEIBERT
MARIA L. KRAIMER
•̂ ' ' ' Cleveland State University
ROBERT C. LIDEN
University of Illinois at Chicago
A model integrating competing theories of social capital with research on career
success was developed and tested in a sample of 448 employees with various occupa-
tions and organizations. Social capital was conceptualized in terms of network struc-
ture and social resources. Results of structural equation modeling showed that net-
work structure was related to social resources and that the effects of social resources
on career success were hilly mediated by three network benelits: access to information,
access to resources, and career sponsorship.
Organizational researchers have begun to de-
velop increasingly comprehensive models of career
success using demographic, human capital, work-
family, motivational, organizational, and industry
variables (e.g., Dreher & Ash, 1990; Judge & Bretz,
1994: Judge, Cable. Boudreau, & Bretz. 1995; Kirch-
meyer, 1998). Although this work has provided
considerable evidence regarding the determinants
of career outcomes, the roles of informal interper-
sonal behaviors have not been fully explored (Judge
& Bretz, 1994; Pfeffer, 1989). Popular advice for
getting ahead in one's career rarely fails to mention
the importance of networking for the achievement
of career goals (e.g., Bolles, 1992; Kanter, 1977).
Indeed, Luthans, Hodgetts, and Rosenkrantz (1988)
found that the most successful managers in their
study spent 70 percent more time engaged in net-
working activities and 10 percent more time en-
gaged in routine communication activities than
their less successful counterparts. Recent advances
in social capital theory (Coleman, 1990) have begun
to provide a finer-grained analysis of the ways in-
dividuals' social networks affect their careers in
organizations (Burt, 1992, 1997; Ibarra, 1995;
Podolny & Baron, 1997; Sparrowe & Popielarz,
1995). This theoretical perspective has the poten-
Data were collected and the manuscript was submitted
and processed while Scott E. Seibert was in the Manage-
ment Department at the University of Notre Dame and
Maria L. Kraimer was a graduate student at the Univer-
sity of Illinois at Chicago. Support for this project was
provided by the Management Department at the Univer-
sity of Notre Dame and the Alumni Office of the Univer-
sity of Notre Dame. The current investigation is part of a
larger study of career success.
tial to considerably enhance scholars' knowledge of
the role of social processes in career success.
The first purpose of the current study was to
integrate the current conceptualizations of social
capital as they pertain to career success. Tbree dif-
ferent theoretical approaches—weak tie theory
(Granovetter, 1973), structural hole theory (Burt,
1992), and social resource theory (Lin, 1990)—
focus on different network properties as r.
`Inclusiveness. The main.docx
`
Inclusiveness. The main difference that can distinguish a happy employee from disgruntled employee. As with all decisions that are made, there is always an audience that the decision will affect. When employees are privy and organizational decisions are inclusive to employees this can greatly increase their level of fulfillment. Whether or not the end user of the decision will be content with the outcome or not, there will always be critics. Which leads us to discuss key characteristics and the importance of involving employees in relative organizational decision making.
It is not uncommon to find that during strategic organizational planning that top-level management will include their employees to engage and provide their input on complex processes. Human capital, whether the organization is large or small, corporate ran or small business managed is key to an organization’s success. Employee satisfaction level drives productivity and is what increases revenue for the company. Happy employees equal happy customers.
What does it take to keep employees motivated? A critical and important element for employers to keep their employees happy and content is clear communication. It is critical that an organization’s objective and vision for future growth is communicated clearly throughout all levels. Top-level management must be skilled at delivering the company’s mission and values to every tier within their organization. Each tier within the organization with healthy communication should be able to open-mindedly accept the message and freely provide any feedback positive or negative without fear of repercussion. Keeping an open line of communication within an organization is key to building the foundation for success.
As we move away from the golden days of traditional office operations consisting of fax machines, telephones, paper, pencils, etc. and move towards a more technologically repertoire, we lose the personable face to face interaction with one another. We spend most of the day behind our computer screen at our desk. The need to sustain job satisfaction amongst employees could not be ever more present than now. To maintain the morale amongst employees, organizations should be able to keep them challenged and motivated. Take technology for example. If the increase of new technology isn’t daunting enough, consider the challenge to remain current with technology all the while maintaining a competitive advantage in the industry? Reach internally to our internal resource, human capital. Employees must be given the opportunity to share their knowledge, skills, and abilities. When empowered to provide input concerning highly visible organizational decisions, employee morale is boosted. Not only is this beneficial for employees but also the employer as they receive ideas and input that could possibly lead to the solution. Employee engagement boosts the overall welfare of the organization.
According to.
__MACOSXSujan Poster._CNA320 Poster Presentation rubric.pdf.docx
__MACOSX/Sujan Poster/._CNA320 Poster Presentation rubric.pdf
__MACOSX/Sujan Poster/._CNA320+Poster+Template (1).ppt
__MACOSX/Sujan Poster/._Helpful Hints for the Poster Presentation.docx
Sujan Poster/Poster Abstract - Aspiration pneumonia (1).docx
Title: Aspiration pneumonia: Best practice to avoid complications
Background
Aspiration pneumonia is a lung infection due to inhaled contents; this is a relevant topic because aspiration pneumonia is prevalent and accounts for up to 15% of all pneumonia cases and is particularly common in older people, and thus it is important for nurses to be aware of how to manage the condition particularly as the population is ageing so this will be of more concern (Kwong, Howden & Charles 2011).
Target Audience
The target audience for this presentation is experienced Registered Nurses and thus the presentation has been designed for this group.
Main Findings
Aspiration pneumonia is an infection within the lungs that occurs after a person aspirates either liquid, vomit or food into the larynx and lower respiratory tract; this can occur when an individual inhales their gastric or oral contents. Patients at risk include individuals who are elderly or those who have a marked disturbance of consciousness such as that resulting from a drug overdose, seizures, a massive cerebrospinal accident, dysphagia or dysphasia (Kwong, Howden & Charles 2011). Aspiration pneumonia can quickly develop into respiratory failure, abscess and empyema and this requires supportive care, which is the main form of therapy, however prophylactic antimicrobial therapy is also often prescribed (Joundi, Wong & Leis 2015). Best practice suggests suctioning, supplemental oxygen to keep O2 above 90%, septic shock therapy, management of hypotension and antibiotic therapy for 7-10 days. Sputum cultures should be taken so that antibiotics can be tailored appropriately (McAdams-Jones & Sundar 2012).
Implications for Practice
These findings are important for registered nurses to be aware of so that aspiration pneumonia can be managed appropriately and complications can be avoided, which could cause increased hospital stay and costs. Nurses need to be aware of the best practice recommendations such as oxygen supplementation, sit up while eating, provide thickened foods and drinks, dental care and about taking sputum cultures when managing aspiration pneumonia so that treatment can be tailored appropriately and recovery can occur quickly.
Feedback from marker (Teacher)
Thank you for your abstract.
You have just managed a pass grade, your work is very basic and you will need to engage with the basic practice literature to ensure you have a comprehensive understanding of this topic in your poster.
I am also unclear on your focus, is this about prevention of aspiration or management once it has occurred or both?
Kind regards Andrea
Sources of Evidence
Joundi, R, Wong, B & Leis, J 2015, "Antibiotics “Just-In-Ca.
More from hanneloremccaffery (20)
Explain how firms can benefit from forecastingexchange rates .docx
Explain how firms can benefit from forecastingexchange rates .docx
•POL201 •Discussions •Week 5 - DiscussionVoter and Voter Tu.docx
•POL201 •Discussions •Week 5 - DiscussionVoter and Voter Tu.docx
•No less than 4 pages causal argument researched essay •In.docx
•No less than 4 pages causal argument researched essay •In.docx
•Focus on two or three things in the Mesopotamian andor Ovids ac.docx
•Focus on two or three things in the Mesopotamian andor Ovids ac.docx
•Langbein, L. (2012). Public program evaluation A statistical guide.docx
•Langbein, L. (2012). Public program evaluation A statistical guide.docx
•Chapter 10 Do you think it is possible for an outsider to accura.docx
•Chapter 10 Do you think it is possible for an outsider to accura.docx
· Bakit Di gaanong kaganda ang pagturo sa UST sa panahon.docx
· Bakit Di gaanong kaganda ang pagturo sa UST sa panahon.docx
·YOUR INDIVIDUAL PAPER IS ARGUMENTATIVE OR POSITIONAL(Heal.docx
·YOUR INDIVIDUAL PAPER IS ARGUMENTATIVE OR POSITIONAL(Heal.docx
·Write a 750- to 1,Write a 750- to 1,200-word paper that.docx
·Write a 750- to 1,Write a 750- to 1,200-word paper that.docx
[Type here]Ok. This school makes me confused. The summary of t.docx
[Type here]Ok. This school makes me confused. The summary of t.docx
© 2020 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplic.docx
© 2020 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplic.docx
© 2016 Laureate Education, Inc. Page 1 of 3 RWRCOEL Prof.docx
© 2016 Laureate Education, Inc. Page 1 of 3 RWRCOEL Prof.docx
© 2022 Post University, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Due Date.docx
© 2022 Post University, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Due Date.docx
~UEER THEORY AND THE JEWISH QUESTI01 Daniel Boyarin, Da.docx
~UEER THEORY AND THE JEWISH QUESTI01 Daniel Boyarin, Da.docx
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.Chapter Twelve.docx
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.Chapter Twelve.docx
`HISTORY 252AEarly Modern Europe from 1500 to 1815Dr. Burton .docx
`HISTORY 252AEarly Modern Europe from 1500 to 1815Dr. Burton .docx
^ Acadumy of Management Journal2001. Vol. 44. No. 2. 219-237.docx
^ Acadumy of Management Journal2001. Vol. 44. No. 2. 219-237.docx
__MACOSXSujan Poster._CNA320 Poster Presentation rubric.pdf.docx
__MACOSXSujan Poster._CNA320 Poster Presentation rubric.pdf.docx
Recently uploaded
Sectors of the Indian Economy - Class 10 Study Notes pdf
The Indian economy is classified into different sectors to simplify the analysis and understanding of economic activities. For Class 10, it's essential to grasp the sectors of the Indian economy, understand their characteristics, and recognize their importance. This guide will provide detailed notes on the Sectors of the Indian Economy Class 10, using specific long-tail keywords to enhance comprehension.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
ESC Beyond Borders _From EU to You_ InfoPack general.pdf
ESC Beyond Borders _From EU to You_ InfoPack general.pdfFundacja Rozwoju Społeczeństwa Przedsiębiorczego
Wolontariat grupowyHow libraries can support authors with open access requirements for UKRI fund...
How libraries can support authors with open access requirements for UKRI funded books
Wednesday 22 May 2024, 14:00-15:00.
The Art Pastor's Guide to Sabbath | Steve Thomason
What is the purpose of the Sabbath Law in the Torah. It is interesting to compare how the context of the law shifts from Exodus to Deuteronomy. Who gets to rest, and why?
Polish students' mobility in the Czech Republic
Polish students mobility to the Czech Republic within eTwinning project "Medieval adventures with Marco Polo"
How to Split Bills in the Odoo 17 POS Module
Bills have a main role in point of sale procedure. It will help to track sales, handling payments and giving receipts to customers. Bill splitting also has an important role in POS. For example, If some friends come together for dinner and if they want to divide the bill then it is possible by POS bill splitting. This slide will show how to split bills in odoo 17 POS.
special B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdf
Instagram:-
https://instagram.com/special_education_needs_01?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y=
WhatsApp:-
https://chat.whatsapp.com/JVakNIYlSV94x7bwunO3Dc
YouTube:-
https://youtube.com/@special_education_needs
Teligram :- https://t.me/special_education_needs
Slide Shere :-
https://www.slideshare.net/shabnambano20?utm_campaign=profiletracking&utm_medium=sssite&utm_source=ssslideview
Operation Blue Star - Saka Neela Tara
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
GIÁO ÁN DẠY THÊM (KẾ HOẠCH BÀI BUỔI 2) - TIẾNG ANH 8 GLOBAL SUCCESS (2 CỘT) N...
GIÁO ÁN DẠY THÊM (KẾ HOẠCH BÀI BUỔI 2) - TIẾNG ANH 8 GLOBAL SUCCESS (2 CỘT) N...Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
https://app.box.com/s/4hfk1xwgxnova7f4dm37birdzflj806wHow to Create Map Views in the Odoo 17 ERP
The map views are useful for providing a geographical representation of data. They allow users to visualize and analyze the data in a more intuitive manner.
Template Jadual Bertugas Kelas (Boleh Edit)
Jadual Bertugas kelas dalam bentuk softcopy PowerPoint. Cikgu boleh download >> edit >> print >> laminate. Semoga bermanfaat.
The geography of Taylor Swift - some ideas
Geographical themes connected with Taylor Swift's ERAS tour - coming to the UK in June 2024
Ethnobotany and Ethnopharmacology ......
Ethnobotany and Ethnopharmacology:
Ethnobotany in herbal drug evaluation,
Impact of Ethnobotany in traditional medicine,
New development in herbals,
Bio-prospecting tools for drug discovery,
Role of Ethnopharmacology in drug evaluation,
Reverse Pharmacology.
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH ANSWERS.
Students, digital devices and success - Andreas Schleicher - 27 May 2024..pptx
Andreas Schleicher presents at the OECD webinar ‘Digital devices in schools: detrimental distraction or secret to success?’ on 27 May 2024. The presentation was based on findings from PISA 2022 results and the webinar helped launch the PISA in Focus ‘Managing screen time: How to protect and equip students against distraction’ https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/managing-screen-time_7c225af4-en and the OECD Education Policy Perspective ‘Students, digital devices and success’ can be found here - https://oe.cd/il/5yV
Recently uploaded (20)
Sectors of the Indian Economy - Class 10 Study Notes pdf
Sectors of the Indian Economy - Class 10 Study Notes pdf
ESC Beyond Borders _From EU to You_ InfoPack general.pdf
ESC Beyond Borders _From EU to You_ InfoPack general.pdf
How libraries can support authors with open access requirements for UKRI fund...
How libraries can support authors with open access requirements for UKRI fund...
The Art Pastor's Guide to Sabbath | Steve Thomason
The Art Pastor's Guide to Sabbath | Steve Thomason
GIÁO ÁN DẠY THÊM (KẾ HOẠCH BÀI BUỔI 2) - TIẾNG ANH 8 GLOBAL SUCCESS (2 CỘT) N...
GIÁO ÁN DẠY THÊM (KẾ HOẠCH BÀI BUỔI 2) - TIẾNG ANH 8 GLOBAL SUCCESS (2 CỘT) N...
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
Students, digital devices and success - Andreas Schleicher - 27 May 2024..pptx
Students, digital devices and success - Andreas Schleicher - 27 May 2024..pptx
FYS Grading Rubric for Writing Assignment A 95 B .docx
- 1. FYS Grading Rubric for Writing Assignment A 95% B 85% C 75% D/F 0% Focus: Purpose Purpose is clear Shows awareness of purpose Shows limited awareness of purpose No awareness Main idea Clearly presents a main idea and supports it throughout the paper. There is a main idea supported throughout most of the paper. Vague sense of a main idea, weakly supported throughout the paper. No main idea Organization: Overall Well-planned and well-thought out. Includes title, introduction, statement of main idea, transitions and conclusion. Good overall organization,
- 2. includes the main organizational tools. There is a sense of organization, although some of the organizational tools are used weakly or missing No sense of organization Organization: Paragraphs All paragraphs have clear ideas, are supported with examples and have smooth transitions. Most paragraphs have clear ideas, are supported with some examples and have transitions. Some paragraphs have clear ideas, support from examples may be missing and transitions are weak. Para. lack clear ideas Content Exceptionally well-presented and argued; ideas are detailed, well- developed, supported with specific evidence & facts, as well as examples and specific details. Well-presented and argued; ideas are detailed, developed and
- 3. supported with evidence and details, mostly specific. Content is sound and solid; ideas are present but not particularly developed or supported; some evidence, but usually of a generalized nature. Content is not sound Research Sources are exceptionally well- integrated and they support claims argued in the paper very effectively. Quotations and Works Cited conform to APA style sheet. Sources are well integrated and support the paper’s claims. There may be occasional errors, but the sources and Works Cited conform to APA style sheet. Sources support some claims made in the paper, but might not be integrated well within the paper’s argument. There may be a few errors in APA style. The paper does not use adequate research or if it does, the sources are not integrated well. They are not cited correctly according to APA style, nor listed correctly on the Works Cited page.
- 4. Style: Sentence structure Sentences are clear and varied in pattern, from simple to complex, with excellent use of punctuation. Sentences are clear but may lack variation; a few may be awkward and there may be a few punctuation errors. Sentences are generally clear but may have awkward structure or unclear content; there may be patterns of punctuation errors. Sentences aren’t clear Style: Details and Examples Large amounts of specific examples and detailed descriptions. Some use of specific examples and detailed descriptions. May have extended examples that go on for too long. Little use of specific examples
- 5. and details; mostly generalized examples and little description. No use of examples Grammar & Mechanics Excellent grammar, spelling, syntax and punctuation. A few errors in grammar, spelling, syntax and punctuation, but not many. Shows a pattern of errors in spelling, grammar, syntax and/or punctuation. Could also be a sign of lack of proof-reading. Continuous errors