SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 12
Splitting the wavefunctions of two particles in two boxes* OUTLINE 1. Introduction:         a QM problem; Probability of finding 2 particles(both bosonic or fermionic) in the box after splitting and merging; similar to EPR  paradox. 2. Where Do The Particles End up?        Y  ←-> Y~ ;  ground state(g) and excited state(e); Yg ←-> Y+,  Ye ←-> Y-               A. Bosons:  can be  gg , ee and ge               B. Fermions:  can be  ge only 3. Discussion: the correct answer from 4 choices 4. Distinguishing Y+ and Y-: a way to find relative phase between w.f.s. 5. Conclusion:  A better way to understand is to use the second      quantization formulation. .  :  * S.J. van Enk, Dept. of Physics, Oregon Center for Optics and Institute for Theoretical Sciences    University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon.    AJP,77,140(2009)
What is EPR paradox?* ,[object Object]
 the interaction is turned off,
 systems I and  II remain correlated(coherent or entangled).
 measurement of observable  A on I is done
If measurement of observable B on I is done:
What if I and II are far apart? Measuring A or B on I  changes II instantly.
EPR paradox: QM is either  incomplete  or action at a distance(no causality)is   	possible*A. Einstein, B. Podolski and N. Rosen, PRV,47,777(1935)
EPR paradox type experiment Dozens of experiments after 1970  support QM predictions. In the following: ,[object Object]
No non-local effect or entanglement involved
This is a local  effect problem
Can be solved with QM using 1st quantization and 2nd quantization methods.,[object Object]

More Related Content

Viewers also liked

G:\Marketing\Tapping Into Global Markets
G:\Marketing\Tapping Into Global MarketsG:\Marketing\Tapping Into Global Markets
G:\Marketing\Tapping Into Global Markets
yashminlumbao
 
Samantha chase, zim williams, retius clark gov final
Samantha chase, zim williams, retius clark gov finalSamantha chase, zim williams, retius clark gov final
Samantha chase, zim williams, retius clark gov final
Samantha Chase
 
v50 10 multiple type questions ch21
v50 10 multiple type questions ch21v50 10 multiple type questions ch21
v50 10 multiple type questions ch21
yashminlumbao
 
Why LinkUp is Different
Why LinkUp is DifferentWhy LinkUp is Different
Why LinkUp is Different
LinkUp
 
Entanglement of formation
Entanglement of formationEntanglement of formation
Entanglement of formation
wtyru1989
 
Bound entanglement is not rare
Bound entanglement is not rareBound entanglement is not rare
Bound entanglement is not rare
wtyru1989
 
Continuous variable quantum entanglement and its applications
Continuous variable quantum entanglement and its applicationsContinuous variable quantum entanglement and its applications
Continuous variable quantum entanglement and its applications
wtyru1989
 
Security of continuous variable quantum key distribution against general attacks
Security of continuous variable quantum key distribution against general attacksSecurity of continuous variable quantum key distribution against general attacks
Security of continuous variable quantum key distribution against general attacks
wtyru1989
 
10 step by step marketing plan selecta ice cream
10 step by step marketing plan selecta ice cream10 step by step marketing plan selecta ice cream
10 step by step marketing plan selecta ice cream
yashminlumbao
 

Viewers also liked (16)

Warp Propulsion System by Quantum Entanglement - INFLATIONARY GEOMETRY
Warp Propulsion System by Quantum Entanglement - INFLATIONARY GEOMETRYWarp Propulsion System by Quantum Entanglement - INFLATIONARY GEOMETRY
Warp Propulsion System by Quantum Entanglement - INFLATIONARY GEOMETRY
 
G:\Marketing\Tapping Into Global Markets
G:\Marketing\Tapping Into Global MarketsG:\Marketing\Tapping Into Global Markets
G:\Marketing\Tapping Into Global Markets
 
Samantha chase, zim williams, retius clark gov final
Samantha chase, zim williams, retius clark gov finalSamantha chase, zim williams, retius clark gov final
Samantha chase, zim williams, retius clark gov final
 
v50 10 multiple type questions ch21
v50 10 multiple type questions ch21v50 10 multiple type questions ch21
v50 10 multiple type questions ch21
 
Browsing and Recomposition Policies to Minimize Temporal Error When Utilizing...
Browsing and Recomposition Policies to Minimize Temporal Error When Utilizing...Browsing and Recomposition Policies to Minimize Temporal Error When Utilizing...
Browsing and Recomposition Policies to Minimize Temporal Error When Utilizing...
 
Why LinkUp is Different
Why LinkUp is DifferentWhy LinkUp is Different
Why LinkUp is Different
 
Evaluating Sliding and Sticky Target Policies by Measuring Temporal Drift in ...
Evaluating Sliding and Sticky Target Policies by Measuring Temporal Drift in ...Evaluating Sliding and Sticky Target Policies by Measuring Temporal Drift in ...
Evaluating Sliding and Sticky Target Policies by Measuring Temporal Drift in ...
 
Entanglement of formation
Entanglement of formationEntanglement of formation
Entanglement of formation
 
Bound entanglement is not rare
Bound entanglement is not rareBound entanglement is not rare
Bound entanglement is not rare
 
Report city bank
Report city bankReport city bank
Report city bank
 
Continuous variable quantum entanglement and its applications
Continuous variable quantum entanglement and its applicationsContinuous variable quantum entanglement and its applications
Continuous variable quantum entanglement and its applications
 
Security of continuous variable quantum key distribution against general attacks
Security of continuous variable quantum key distribution against general attacksSecurity of continuous variable quantum key distribution against general attacks
Security of continuous variable quantum key distribution against general attacks
 
Multi-particle Entanglement in Quantum States and Evolutions
Multi-particle Entanglement in Quantum States and EvolutionsMulti-particle Entanglement in Quantum States and Evolutions
Multi-particle Entanglement in Quantum States and Evolutions
 
Quantum Entanglement
Quantum EntanglementQuantum Entanglement
Quantum Entanglement
 
Quantum Entanglement - Cryptography and Communication
Quantum Entanglement - Cryptography and CommunicationQuantum Entanglement - Cryptography and Communication
Quantum Entanglement - Cryptography and Communication
 
10 step by step marketing plan selecta ice cream
10 step by step marketing plan selecta ice cream10 step by step marketing plan selecta ice cream
10 step by step marketing plan selecta ice cream
 

Similar to Report

Magnetic monopoles and group theory.
Magnetic monopoles and group theory.Magnetic monopoles and group theory.
Magnetic monopoles and group theory.
Renata Queiroz
 
4 The Atom & Electronic Configuration
4 The Atom & Electronic Configuration4 The Atom & Electronic Configuration
4 The Atom & Electronic Configuration
janetra
 

Similar to Report (20)

Jordan-Lie algebra of single-spin chiral fields
Jordan-Lie algebra of single-spin chiral fieldsJordan-Lie algebra of single-spin chiral fields
Jordan-Lie algebra of single-spin chiral fields
 
Molecular orbital theory, 11(3)
Molecular orbital theory, 11(3)Molecular orbital theory, 11(3)
Molecular orbital theory, 11(3)
 
Dark matter
Dark matterDark matter
Dark matter
 
Quantum entanglement
Quantum entanglementQuantum entanglement
Quantum entanglement
 
Semiconductor ch.3 part iii statistical mechanics
Semiconductor ch.3 part iii statistical mechanicsSemiconductor ch.3 part iii statistical mechanics
Semiconductor ch.3 part iii statistical mechanics
 
Hartree fock theory
Hartree fock theoryHartree fock theory
Hartree fock theory
 
Hartree fock theory
Hartree fock theoryHartree fock theory
Hartree fock theory
 
PhysRevLett.80.3891.pdf
PhysRevLett.80.3891.pdfPhysRevLett.80.3891.pdf
PhysRevLett.80.3891.pdf
 
Chapter4 Powerpoint
Chapter4 PowerpointChapter4 Powerpoint
Chapter4 Powerpoint
 
Complex Dynamics and Statistics in Hamiltonian 1-D Lattices - Tassos Bountis
Complex Dynamics and Statistics  in Hamiltonian 1-D Lattices - Tassos Bountis Complex Dynamics and Statistics  in Hamiltonian 1-D Lattices - Tassos Bountis
Complex Dynamics and Statistics in Hamiltonian 1-D Lattices - Tassos Bountis
 
Subatomic particles.pptx
Subatomic particles.pptxSubatomic particles.pptx
Subatomic particles.pptx
 
Lecture 7
Lecture 7Lecture 7
Lecture 7
 
E27
E27E27
E27
 
What happens if measure the electron spin twice?
What happens if measure the electron spin twice?What happens if measure the electron spin twice?
What happens if measure the electron spin twice?
 
Electrons.ppt
Electrons.pptElectrons.ppt
Electrons.ppt
 
Magnetic monopoles and group theory.
Magnetic monopoles and group theory.Magnetic monopoles and group theory.
Magnetic monopoles and group theory.
 
Chapter_4.pptx .
Chapter_4.pptx                          .Chapter_4.pptx                          .
Chapter_4.pptx .
 
4 b5lecture62008
4 b5lecture620084 b5lecture62008
4 b5lecture62008
 
4 The Atom & Electronic Configuration
4 The Atom & Electronic Configuration4 The Atom & Electronic Configuration
4 The Atom & Electronic Configuration
 
Many-electron-atoms.ppt
Many-electron-atoms.pptMany-electron-atoms.ppt
Many-electron-atoms.ppt
 

Report

  • 1. Splitting the wavefunctions of two particles in two boxes* OUTLINE 1. Introduction: a QM problem; Probability of finding 2 particles(both bosonic or fermionic) in the box after splitting and merging; similar to EPR paradox. 2. Where Do The Particles End up? Y ←-> Y~ ; ground state(g) and excited state(e); Yg ←-> Y+, Ye ←-> Y- A. Bosons: can be gg , ee and ge B. Fermions: can be ge only 3. Discussion: the correct answer from 4 choices 4. Distinguishing Y+ and Y-: a way to find relative phase between w.f.s. 5. Conclusion: A better way to understand is to use the second quantization formulation. . : * S.J. van Enk, Dept. of Physics, Oregon Center for Optics and Institute for Theoretical Sciences University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon. AJP,77,140(2009)
  • 2.
  • 3. the interaction is turned off,
  • 4. systems I and II remain correlated(coherent or entangled).
  • 5. measurement of observable A on I is done
  • 6. If measurement of observable B on I is done:
  • 7. What if I and II are far apart? Measuring A or B on I changes II instantly.
  • 8. EPR paradox: QM is either incomplete or action at a distance(no causality)is possible*A. Einstein, B. Podolski and N. Rosen, PRV,47,777(1935)
  • 9.
  • 10. No non-local effect or entanglement involved
  • 11. This is a local effect problem
  • 12.
  • 13. Probability of 2 particles in WL and SR, Pws=? Particle 2 Note: 0<x1,x2<2L before splitting 0<x1,x2<L and L<x1,x2<2L after splitting
  • 14. For Classical distinguishable particles 25% 2 WS 25% 2 SW 50% 1 WS + 1 SW Pws =1/4
  • 15. Identical quantum particlesbosonic and fermionic? The answer is …… P = ¼ because only particle numbers are concerned, no other Q.#s Bosons together, P = ½ Fermions expells , P = 0 3. Exchange particles, same as color repainted, no actual change, P= 0 for B and F. 4. P=0 for Boson as in 3; P=1/2 for Fermion because minus sign of w.f.
  • 16. W.F. describing 2 particles in 2 boxes where S is symmetrization operator or anti-symmetrization operator. After splitting the boxes, w.f. is : Multiply terms, So, you can see P=1/4 is the correct answer!
  • 17. Yg Ye Y+ Y- However, excited state and ground state are degenerate after splitting the box. Take the 2nd term of Eq. (3) of the splitted boxes
  • 18.
  • 19.
  • 20. Can you tell actually which one it is?Prepare a 2nd box, say Y+. Then merge two halves on each side . We will have ……….
  • 21.
  • 22. We can tell which one,Y+ or Y-, is given to us if wemeasure the states of the 2 particles.
  • 23. conclusion Summary and some key points References