SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 56
Mann – Whitney U test
• It is a non-parametric statistical method that
compares two groups that are independent of
sample data.
• It is used to test the null hypothesis that the
two samples have similar median or whether
observations in one sample are likely to have
larger values than those in other sample
• The parametric equivalent of Mann-Whitney
U test is t- test of unrelated sample
Assumption
• The two samples are random
• Two samples are independent of each other
• Measurement is of ordinal type thus
observations are arranged in ranks
Steps to perform
• The null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis
are identified.
• The significance level [alpha] related with null
hypothesis is stated. Usually alpha is set at 5%
and therefore, the confidence level is 95 %
• All of the observations are arranged in terms
of magnitude.
• The Ra denotes the sum of the ranks in group
a
• The Rb denotes the sum of ranks in group b
• U statistics is determined by
Verify Ua + Ub = nanb
• Evaluate U = min [ Ua,Ub]
• The obtained value is smaller of the two
statistics
• Using table of critics evaluate the possibility of
obtaining value of U or lower
• The critical value is compared with the
obtained value.
• The results are then interpreted to draw
conclusion.
Perform the Mann-Whitney U test
Treatment A Treatment B
3 9
4 7
2 5
6 10
2 6
5 8
Why Mann-Whitney U test
• Student t test I s preferred for this data but
• Data are not normal
• Sample size is small
Obsevations Arranged in order
1 2
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 5
7 6
8 6
9 7
10 8
11 9
12 10
There is no difference between the
rank of each treatment
Rank observation
1.5 2
1.5 2
3 3
4 4
5.5 5
5.5 5
7.5 6
7.5 6
9 7
10 8
11 9
12 10
TA Rank a Tb Rank b
3 3 9 11
4 4 7 9
2 1.5 5 5.5
6 7.5 10 12
2 1.5 6 7.5
5 5.5 8 10
Sum of Ra 23 Sum of Rb 55
Cross check
• Ua= 23- 6[6+1]/2
• = 23- 42/2
• = 23-21
• = 2
• Ub = 55- 6[ 6+1]/2
• = 55-21
• = 34
We have to choose lowest value
hence U= 2
• Use u table= critical value
• N1=6 n2=6
• U critics from table = 5
• We should get the calculated value as equal to
or greater than table value.
• Here we got lesser value than table value
hence null hypothesis is rejected.
Wilcoxon Rank sum test
• It is non-parametric dependent samples t test
that can be performed on ranked or ordinal
data.
• Mann-Whitney Wilcoxon test
• It is used to test null hypothesis
• It is used to assess whether the distribution of
observations obtained between two separate
groups on a dependent variable are
systematically different from one another.
• It is used to evaluate the populations that are
equally distributed or not
• A population is set of similar items or data
obtained from experiment
• Rank basically two types of rank given Ra large
and Rb small.
It can be used in the place of
• One sample t test
• Paired t test
• For ordered categorical data where a
numerical scale is in appropriate but where it
is possible to rank the observations
General way to perform test
• State the null hypothesis Ho and the
alternative hypothesis H1
• Define alpha level
• Define decision rule
• Calculate Z statistics
• Calculate results
• Make conclusion
For paired data
• State the null hypothesis
• Calculate each paired difference
• Rank di ignoring signs [ assign rank 1 to the
smallest , rank 2 to the next etc ]
• Designate each rank along with its sign. Based
on the sign of di
• Calculate W+ the sum of the ranks of positive
di and W- the sum of the ranks of the negative
di.
• [W+] + [W-] = n [n+1]2
Problem
Group A p1 Group B p2
41 66
56 43
64 72
42 62
50 55
70 80
44 74
57 75
63 77
78
N1=9 N2=10
Group s = P1 + P2 Group Rank
41 A 1
42 A 2
43 B 3
44 A 4
50 A 5
55 B 6
56 A 7
57 A 8
62 B 9
63
64
A
A
10
11
66 B 12
70 A 13
72 B 14
Group s = P1 + P2 Group Rank
74 B 15
75 B 16
77 B 17
78 B 18
80 B 19
Group A Rank sum
Group s = P1 + P2 Group Rank
41 A 1
42 A 2
44 A 4
50 A 5
56 A 7
57 A 8
63
64
A
A
10
11
70 A 13
SUM OF Rank a 61
Group B Rank sum
Group s = P1 + P2 Group Rank
43 B 3
55 B 6
62 B 9
66 B 12
72 B 14
74 B 15
75 B 16
77 B 17
78 B 18
80 B 19
Sum of Group B 129
Small Rank sum is chosen: 61
• μr=n1 [n1+ n2 + 1] /2
• μr= 9 [ 9+ 10+1 ] /2
• μr= 9 [20]/2 = 180/2 = 90
• σr =
Krushal –Wallis H-test
• H test
• Non parametric statistical procedure used for
comparing more than two independent
sample
• Parametric equivalent to this test is one way
ANOVA
• H test is for non-normally distributed data.
Krushal –Wallis H-test
• It is a generalization of the Mann- Whitney
test which is a test for determining whether
the two samples selected are taken from the
same population.
• The p values in both the Krushal –Wallis and
the Mann-Whitney tests are equal
• It is used for samples to evaluate their degree
of association.
Description of sample
• 3 independently drawn sample.
• Data in each sample should be more than 5
• Both distribution and population have same
shape
• Data must be ranked
• Samples must be independent
• K independent sample k> 3 or K=3
Characteristics
• Test statistics is applied when data is not normally
distributed
• Test uses k samples of data.
• Test can be used for one nominal and one ranked
variable
• Significance level is denoted with α
• Data is ranked and df is n-1
• The rank of each sample is calculated
• Average rank is applied in case if there is tie
Problem
• Null hypothesis
• K independent sample drawn from population
which are identically distributed.
• Alternative hypothesis
• K independent sample drawn from population
which are not identically distributed.
Notation
Sampl1 obseravtion
1 Xxx Xxx Xxx Xxx Xxx
2 Xxx Xxx Xxx Xxx Xxx Xxx xxx
3 Xxx Xxx Xxx xxx Xxx Xxx Xxx Xxx
K Xxx Xxx Xxx Xxx Xxx Xxx xxx
Observation more than five
K =3 or K>3
Procedure
• Define null H0 and alternative H1 hypothesis.
• Rank the sample observations in the
combined series.
• Compute Ti sum of ranks
• Apply chi square variate with K-1 degree of
freedom
• K = number of sample
• Conclusion
• Take the table value from Chi 2 [k-1][α]
• If calculated H value > Chi 2 [k-1][α]
• We reject H0
Use krushal wallis H test at 5 % level of
significance if three methods are
equally effective
Method
1
99 64 101 85 79 88 97 95 90 100
Method
2
83 102 125 61 91 96 94 89 93 75
Method
3
89 98 56 105 87 90 87 101 76 89
Step I
• Null hypotheis
• H0 : μ a = μ b = μc
• Three methods are equally effective
• Alternative hypothesis H1= at least two of the
μ are different
• Three methods are not equally effective
• n1+n2+n3=30
Step II
Met
hod
1
99 64 101 85 79 88 97 95 90 100 T1
Rank 24 3 26.5 8 6 11 22 20 15.5 25 161
Met
hod
2
83 102 125 61 91 96 94 89 93 75 T2
Rank 7 28 30 2 17 21 19 13 18 4 159
Met
hod
3
89 98 56 105 87 90 87 101 76 89 T3
Rank 13 23 1 29 9.5 15.5 9.5 26.5 5 13 145
n1 10 n2 10 n3 10
Compute statistics H
Compute statistics H
• Df = K-1 =3-1=2
• Table value = 5.99
• Calculated value is 0.196
• Since the calculated H value
• 0.196 < 5.99
• We fail to reject H0
• All the teaching methods are equal
Friedman test
• It is a non parametric test developed and
implemented by Milton Friedman.
• It is used for finding differences in treatments
across multiple attempts by comparing three
or more dependent samples.
• It is an alternative to ANOVA when the
assumption of normality is not met
Friedman test
• The test is calculated using ranks of data
instead of unprocessed data
• It is used to test for differences between
groups when the dependent variable being
measured is ordinal.
• It can also be used for continuous data that
has marked as deviations from normality with
repeated measures.
• It is a repeated measures of ANOVA that can
be performed on the ordinal data.
Descriptions and requirements
• Dependent variable should be measured at the
ordinal or continuous level
• Data comes from a single group measured on at
least three different occasions.
• Random sampling method must be used
• All of the pairs are independent.
• Observations are ranked within blocks with no
ties
• Samples need not be normally distributed.
Problem ordinal data is given .is there
a difference between weeks 1,2,3
using alpha as 0.05
week1 Week 2 Week 3
27 20 34
2 8 31
4 14 3
18 36 23
7 21 30
9 22 6
Steps
• Define null and alternative hypothesis.
• State alpha
• Calculate degree of freedom
• State decision rule
• Calculate the statistic
• State result
• conclusion
Step 1
• Null hypothesis
• H0 there is no difference between three
conditions.
• Alternative hypotheis
• H1 there is a difference between three
conditions
Step 2
• State alpha
• 0.05
Step3
• Degree of freedom’
• df=K-1
• K = no of groups
• =3-1=2
• df=2
Step 4
• Decision rule – chi square table
Chi square is greater than 5.991 than you can
reject the null hypothesis
Step 5Rank the value
Week 1 Week 2 Week 3
2 1 3
1 2 3
2 3 1
1 3 2
1 2 3
2 3 1
R=9 R=14 R=13
Step 6 Calculation of statistics
Step 7.state result
• If chi square is greater than 5.991 than reject
the null hypothesis.
• Calculated chi square value is 2.33
• Calculated value is lesser than table value
hence fail to reject null hypotheis.
• Hence there is no difference among the three
group.
All non parametric test

More Related Content

What's hot

designing the methodology.pptx
designing the methodology.pptxdesigning the methodology.pptx
designing the methodology.pptx
SreeLatha98
 
Friedman test Stat
Friedman test Stat Friedman test Stat
Friedman test Stat
Kate Malda
 
Nonparametric tests
Nonparametric testsNonparametric tests
Nonparametric tests
Arun Kumar
 
Factorial design
Factorial designFactorial design
Factorial design
Gaurav Kr
 

What's hot (20)

designing the methodology.pptx
designing the methodology.pptxdesigning the methodology.pptx
designing the methodology.pptx
 
Factorial Design.pptx
Factorial Design.pptxFactorial Design.pptx
Factorial Design.pptx
 
Friedman test Stat
Friedman test Stat Friedman test Stat
Friedman test Stat
 
Testing of hypothesis
Testing of hypothesisTesting of hypothesis
Testing of hypothesis
 
Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test
Wilcoxon Rank-Sum TestWilcoxon Rank-Sum Test
Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test
 
Introduction to Research - Biostatistics and Research methodology 8th Sem Uni...
Introduction to Research - Biostatistics and Research methodology 8th Sem Uni...Introduction to Research - Biostatistics and Research methodology 8th Sem Uni...
Introduction to Research - Biostatistics and Research methodology 8th Sem Uni...
 
Unit 2 Regression- BSRM.pdf
Unit 2 Regression- BSRM.pdfUnit 2 Regression- BSRM.pdf
Unit 2 Regression- BSRM.pdf
 
Simple & Multiple Regression Analysis
Simple & Multiple Regression AnalysisSimple & Multiple Regression Analysis
Simple & Multiple Regression Analysis
 
basic information resource.pptx
basic information resource.pptxbasic information resource.pptx
basic information resource.pptx
 
wilcoxon signed rank test
wilcoxon signed rank testwilcoxon signed rank test
wilcoxon signed rank test
 
DATA GRAPHICS 8th Sem.pdf
DATA GRAPHICS 8th Sem.pdfDATA GRAPHICS 8th Sem.pdf
DATA GRAPHICS 8th Sem.pdf
 
Graphs(Biostatistics and Research Methodology) B.pharmacy(8th sem.)
Graphs(Biostatistics and Research Methodology) B.pharmacy(8th sem.)Graphs(Biostatistics and Research Methodology) B.pharmacy(8th sem.)
Graphs(Biostatistics and Research Methodology) B.pharmacy(8th sem.)
 
Factorial design \Optimization Techniques
Factorial design \Optimization TechniquesFactorial design \Optimization Techniques
Factorial design \Optimization Techniques
 
2.3  Daily defined doses.pptx
2.3  Daily defined doses.pptx2.3  Daily defined doses.pptx
2.3  Daily defined doses.pptx
 
The mann whitney u test
The mann whitney u testThe mann whitney u test
The mann whitney u test
 
Wilcoxon signed rank test
Wilcoxon signed rank testWilcoxon signed rank test
Wilcoxon signed rank test
 
Biostat 8th semester B.Pharm-Introduction Ravinandan A P.pdf
Biostat 8th semester B.Pharm-Introduction Ravinandan A P.pdfBiostat 8th semester B.Pharm-Introduction Ravinandan A P.pdf
Biostat 8th semester B.Pharm-Introduction Ravinandan A P.pdf
 
Nonparametric tests
Nonparametric testsNonparametric tests
Nonparametric tests
 
Factorial design
Factorial designFactorial design
Factorial design
 
Design of Experiments (Pharma)
Design of Experiments (Pharma)Design of Experiments (Pharma)
Design of Experiments (Pharma)
 

Similar to All non parametric test

allnonparametrictest-210427031923.pptx
allnonparametrictest-210427031923.pptxallnonparametrictest-210427031923.pptx
allnonparametrictest-210427031923.pptx
SoujanyaLk1
 
NON-PARAMETRIC TESTS.pptx
NON-PARAMETRIC TESTS.pptxNON-PARAMETRIC TESTS.pptx
NON-PARAMETRIC TESTS.pptx
DrLasya
 
T12 non-parametric tests
T12 non-parametric testsT12 non-parametric tests
T12 non-parametric tests
kompellark
 

Similar to All non parametric test (20)

allnonparametrictest-210427031923.pptx
allnonparametrictest-210427031923.pptxallnonparametrictest-210427031923.pptx
allnonparametrictest-210427031923.pptx
 
Non parametric-tests
Non parametric-testsNon parametric-tests
Non parametric-tests
 
Non-parametric analysis: Wilcoxon, Kruskal Wallis & Spearman
Non-parametric analysis: Wilcoxon, Kruskal Wallis & SpearmanNon-parametric analysis: Wilcoxon, Kruskal Wallis & Spearman
Non-parametric analysis: Wilcoxon, Kruskal Wallis & Spearman
 
UNIT 5.pptx
UNIT 5.pptxUNIT 5.pptx
UNIT 5.pptx
 
NON-PARAMETRIC TESTS.pptx
NON-PARAMETRIC TESTS.pptxNON-PARAMETRIC TESTS.pptx
NON-PARAMETRIC TESTS.pptx
 
T12 non-parametric tests
T12 non-parametric testsT12 non-parametric tests
T12 non-parametric tests
 
non parametric test.pptx
non parametric test.pptxnon parametric test.pptx
non parametric test.pptx
 
Non parametric test
Non parametric testNon parametric test
Non parametric test
 
non parametric statistics
non parametric statisticsnon parametric statistics
non parametric statistics
 
Hypothesis Testing.pptx
Hypothesis Testing.pptxHypothesis Testing.pptx
Hypothesis Testing.pptx
 
Stats - Intro to Quantitative
Stats -  Intro to Quantitative Stats -  Intro to Quantitative
Stats - Intro to Quantitative
 
t distribution, paired and unpaired t-test
t distribution, paired and unpaired t-testt distribution, paired and unpaired t-test
t distribution, paired and unpaired t-test
 
Hypothsis testing
Hypothsis testingHypothsis testing
Hypothsis testing
 
Kruskal Wallis test, Friedman test, Spearman Correlation
Kruskal Wallis test, Friedman test, Spearman CorrelationKruskal Wallis test, Friedman test, Spearman Correlation
Kruskal Wallis test, Friedman test, Spearman Correlation
 
Non parametrics tests
Non parametrics testsNon parametrics tests
Non parametrics tests
 
Presentation non parametric
Presentation non parametricPresentation non parametric
Presentation non parametric
 
hypothesis teesting
 hypothesis teesting hypothesis teesting
hypothesis teesting
 
biostat__final_ppt_unit_3.pptx
biostat__final_ppt_unit_3.pptxbiostat__final_ppt_unit_3.pptx
biostat__final_ppt_unit_3.pptx
 
Normality
NormalityNormality
Normality
 
Nonparametric Statistics
Nonparametric StatisticsNonparametric Statistics
Nonparametric Statistics
 

More from gopinathannsriramachandraeduin

More from gopinathannsriramachandraeduin (20)

Air pollution
Air pollutionAir pollution
Air pollution
 
What happens to pollutants in the atmosphere
What happens to pollutants in the atmosphereWhat happens to pollutants in the atmosphere
What happens to pollutants in the atmosphere
 
Water pollution
Water pollutionWater pollution
Water pollution
 
Solid waste management
Solid waste managementSolid waste management
Solid waste management
 
Soil pollution
Soil pollutionSoil pollution
Soil pollution
 
Nuclear hazards
Nuclear hazardsNuclear hazards
Nuclear hazards
 
Noise pollution
Noise pollutionNoise pollution
Noise pollution
 
Marine pollution
Marine pollutionMarine pollution
Marine pollution
 
Structure of atmosphere
Structure of atmosphereStructure of atmosphere
Structure of atmosphere
 
Five primary pollutants air pollution
Five primary pollutants air pollutionFive primary pollutants air pollution
Five primary pollutants air pollution
 
Air pollution
Air pollutionAir pollution
Air pollution
 
Types of plagiarism
Types of plagiarismTypes of plagiarism
Types of plagiarism
 
Plagiarism
PlagiarismPlagiarism
Plagiarism
 
Designing the methodology
Designing the methodologyDesigning the methodology
Designing the methodology
 
Experimental design techniques
Experimental design techniquesExperimental design techniques
Experimental design techniques
 
Report writing
Report writingReport writing
Report writing
 
Observational study design
Observational study designObservational study design
Observational study design
 
Graphs17052021
Graphs17052021Graphs17052021
Graphs17052021
 
Measure of dispersion 10321
Measure of dispersion 10321Measure of dispersion 10321
Measure of dispersion 10321
 
Need for research and research design
Need for research and research designNeed for research and research design
Need for research and research design
 

Recently uploaded

The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptxThe basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
heathfieldcps1
 
Call Girls in Uttam Nagar (delhi) call me [🔝9953056974🔝] escort service 24X7
Call Girls in  Uttam Nagar (delhi) call me [🔝9953056974🔝] escort service 24X7Call Girls in  Uttam Nagar (delhi) call me [🔝9953056974🔝] escort service 24X7
Call Girls in Uttam Nagar (delhi) call me [🔝9953056974🔝] escort service 24X7
9953056974 Low Rate Call Girls In Saket, Delhi NCR
 
Spellings Wk 4 and Wk 5 for Grade 4 at CAPS
Spellings Wk 4 and Wk 5 for Grade 4 at CAPSSpellings Wk 4 and Wk 5 for Grade 4 at CAPS
Spellings Wk 4 and Wk 5 for Grade 4 at CAPS
AnaAcapella
 

Recently uploaded (20)

How to Create and Manage Wizard in Odoo 17
How to Create and Manage Wizard in Odoo 17How to Create and Manage Wizard in Odoo 17
How to Create and Manage Wizard in Odoo 17
 
How to Manage Global Discount in Odoo 17 POS
How to Manage Global Discount in Odoo 17 POSHow to Manage Global Discount in Odoo 17 POS
How to Manage Global Discount in Odoo 17 POS
 
Single or Multiple melodic lines structure
Single or Multiple melodic lines structureSingle or Multiple melodic lines structure
Single or Multiple melodic lines structure
 
Towards a code of practice for AI in AT.pptx
Towards a code of practice for AI in AT.pptxTowards a code of practice for AI in AT.pptx
Towards a code of practice for AI in AT.pptx
 
Wellbeing inclusion and digital dystopias.pptx
Wellbeing inclusion and digital dystopias.pptxWellbeing inclusion and digital dystopias.pptx
Wellbeing inclusion and digital dystopias.pptx
 
Philosophy of china and it's charactistics
Philosophy of china and it's charactisticsPhilosophy of china and it's charactistics
Philosophy of china and it's charactistics
 
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptxThe basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
 
How to Manage Call for Tendor in Odoo 17
How to Manage Call for Tendor in Odoo 17How to Manage Call for Tendor in Odoo 17
How to Manage Call for Tendor in Odoo 17
 
Jamworks pilot and AI at Jisc (20/03/2024)
Jamworks pilot and AI at Jisc (20/03/2024)Jamworks pilot and AI at Jisc (20/03/2024)
Jamworks pilot and AI at Jisc (20/03/2024)
 
Exploring_the_Narrative_Style_of_Amitav_Ghoshs_Gun_Island.pptx
Exploring_the_Narrative_Style_of_Amitav_Ghoshs_Gun_Island.pptxExploring_the_Narrative_Style_of_Amitav_Ghoshs_Gun_Island.pptx
Exploring_the_Narrative_Style_of_Amitav_Ghoshs_Gun_Island.pptx
 
Graduate Outcomes Presentation Slides - English
Graduate Outcomes Presentation Slides - EnglishGraduate Outcomes Presentation Slides - English
Graduate Outcomes Presentation Slides - English
 
Call Girls in Uttam Nagar (delhi) call me [🔝9953056974🔝] escort service 24X7
Call Girls in  Uttam Nagar (delhi) call me [🔝9953056974🔝] escort service 24X7Call Girls in  Uttam Nagar (delhi) call me [🔝9953056974🔝] escort service 24X7
Call Girls in Uttam Nagar (delhi) call me [🔝9953056974🔝] escort service 24X7
 
dusjagr & nano talk on open tools for agriculture research and learning
dusjagr & nano talk on open tools for agriculture research and learningdusjagr & nano talk on open tools for agriculture research and learning
dusjagr & nano talk on open tools for agriculture research and learning
 
OSCM Unit 2_Operations Processes & Systems
OSCM Unit 2_Operations Processes & SystemsOSCM Unit 2_Operations Processes & Systems
OSCM Unit 2_Operations Processes & Systems
 
AIM of Education-Teachers Training-2024.ppt
AIM of Education-Teachers Training-2024.pptAIM of Education-Teachers Training-2024.ppt
AIM of Education-Teachers Training-2024.ppt
 
How to setup Pycharm environment for Odoo 17.pptx
How to setup Pycharm environment for Odoo 17.pptxHow to setup Pycharm environment for Odoo 17.pptx
How to setup Pycharm environment for Odoo 17.pptx
 
General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual Proper...
General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual  Proper...General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual  Proper...
General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual Proper...
 
How to Add a Tool Tip to a Field in Odoo 17
How to Add a Tool Tip to a Field in Odoo 17How to Add a Tool Tip to a Field in Odoo 17
How to Add a Tool Tip to a Field in Odoo 17
 
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
 
Spellings Wk 4 and Wk 5 for Grade 4 at CAPS
Spellings Wk 4 and Wk 5 for Grade 4 at CAPSSpellings Wk 4 and Wk 5 for Grade 4 at CAPS
Spellings Wk 4 and Wk 5 for Grade 4 at CAPS
 

All non parametric test

  • 2. • It is a non-parametric statistical method that compares two groups that are independent of sample data. • It is used to test the null hypothesis that the two samples have similar median or whether observations in one sample are likely to have larger values than those in other sample • The parametric equivalent of Mann-Whitney U test is t- test of unrelated sample
  • 3. Assumption • The two samples are random • Two samples are independent of each other • Measurement is of ordinal type thus observations are arranged in ranks
  • 4. Steps to perform • The null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis are identified. • The significance level [alpha] related with null hypothesis is stated. Usually alpha is set at 5% and therefore, the confidence level is 95 % • All of the observations are arranged in terms of magnitude.
  • 5. • The Ra denotes the sum of the ranks in group a • The Rb denotes the sum of ranks in group b • U statistics is determined by Verify Ua + Ub = nanb
  • 6. • Evaluate U = min [ Ua,Ub] • The obtained value is smaller of the two statistics • Using table of critics evaluate the possibility of obtaining value of U or lower • The critical value is compared with the obtained value. • The results are then interpreted to draw conclusion.
  • 7. Perform the Mann-Whitney U test Treatment A Treatment B 3 9 4 7 2 5 6 10 2 6 5 8
  • 8. Why Mann-Whitney U test • Student t test I s preferred for this data but • Data are not normal • Sample size is small
  • 9. Obsevations Arranged in order 1 2 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 5 7 6 8 6 9 7 10 8 11 9 12 10
  • 10. There is no difference between the rank of each treatment Rank observation 1.5 2 1.5 2 3 3 4 4 5.5 5 5.5 5 7.5 6 7.5 6 9 7 10 8 11 9 12 10
  • 11. TA Rank a Tb Rank b 3 3 9 11 4 4 7 9 2 1.5 5 5.5 6 7.5 10 12 2 1.5 6 7.5 5 5.5 8 10 Sum of Ra 23 Sum of Rb 55
  • 13. • Ua= 23- 6[6+1]/2 • = 23- 42/2 • = 23-21 • = 2 • Ub = 55- 6[ 6+1]/2 • = 55-21 • = 34
  • 14. We have to choose lowest value hence U= 2 • Use u table= critical value • N1=6 n2=6 • U critics from table = 5 • We should get the calculated value as equal to or greater than table value. • Here we got lesser value than table value hence null hypothesis is rejected.
  • 15. Wilcoxon Rank sum test • It is non-parametric dependent samples t test that can be performed on ranked or ordinal data. • Mann-Whitney Wilcoxon test • It is used to test null hypothesis • It is used to assess whether the distribution of observations obtained between two separate groups on a dependent variable are systematically different from one another.
  • 16. • It is used to evaluate the populations that are equally distributed or not • A population is set of similar items or data obtained from experiment • Rank basically two types of rank given Ra large and Rb small.
  • 17. It can be used in the place of • One sample t test • Paired t test • For ordered categorical data where a numerical scale is in appropriate but where it is possible to rank the observations
  • 18. General way to perform test • State the null hypothesis Ho and the alternative hypothesis H1 • Define alpha level • Define decision rule • Calculate Z statistics • Calculate results • Make conclusion
  • 19. For paired data • State the null hypothesis • Calculate each paired difference • Rank di ignoring signs [ assign rank 1 to the smallest , rank 2 to the next etc ] • Designate each rank along with its sign. Based on the sign of di
  • 20. • Calculate W+ the sum of the ranks of positive di and W- the sum of the ranks of the negative di. • [W+] + [W-] = n [n+1]2
  • 21. Problem Group A p1 Group B p2 41 66 56 43 64 72 42 62 50 55 70 80 44 74 57 75 63 77 78 N1=9 N2=10
  • 22. Group s = P1 + P2 Group Rank 41 A 1 42 A 2 43 B 3 44 A 4 50 A 5 55 B 6 56 A 7 57 A 8 62 B 9 63 64 A A 10 11 66 B 12 70 A 13 72 B 14
  • 23. Group s = P1 + P2 Group Rank 74 B 15 75 B 16 77 B 17 78 B 18 80 B 19
  • 24. Group A Rank sum Group s = P1 + P2 Group Rank 41 A 1 42 A 2 44 A 4 50 A 5 56 A 7 57 A 8 63 64 A A 10 11 70 A 13 SUM OF Rank a 61
  • 25. Group B Rank sum Group s = P1 + P2 Group Rank 43 B 3 55 B 6 62 B 9 66 B 12 72 B 14 74 B 15 75 B 16 77 B 17 78 B 18 80 B 19 Sum of Group B 129
  • 26. Small Rank sum is chosen: 61 • μr=n1 [n1+ n2 + 1] /2 • μr= 9 [ 9+ 10+1 ] /2 • μr= 9 [20]/2 = 180/2 = 90 • σr =
  • 27.
  • 28.
  • 29. Krushal –Wallis H-test • H test • Non parametric statistical procedure used for comparing more than two independent sample • Parametric equivalent to this test is one way ANOVA • H test is for non-normally distributed data.
  • 30. Krushal –Wallis H-test • It is a generalization of the Mann- Whitney test which is a test for determining whether the two samples selected are taken from the same population. • The p values in both the Krushal –Wallis and the Mann-Whitney tests are equal • It is used for samples to evaluate their degree of association.
  • 31. Description of sample • 3 independently drawn sample. • Data in each sample should be more than 5 • Both distribution and population have same shape • Data must be ranked • Samples must be independent • K independent sample k> 3 or K=3
  • 32. Characteristics • Test statistics is applied when data is not normally distributed • Test uses k samples of data. • Test can be used for one nominal and one ranked variable • Significance level is denoted with α • Data is ranked and df is n-1 • The rank of each sample is calculated • Average rank is applied in case if there is tie
  • 33. Problem • Null hypothesis • K independent sample drawn from population which are identically distributed. • Alternative hypothesis • K independent sample drawn from population which are not identically distributed.
  • 34. Notation Sampl1 obseravtion 1 Xxx Xxx Xxx Xxx Xxx 2 Xxx Xxx Xxx Xxx Xxx Xxx xxx 3 Xxx Xxx Xxx xxx Xxx Xxx Xxx Xxx K Xxx Xxx Xxx Xxx Xxx Xxx xxx Observation more than five K =3 or K>3
  • 35. Procedure • Define null H0 and alternative H1 hypothesis. • Rank the sample observations in the combined series. • Compute Ti sum of ranks
  • 36. • Apply chi square variate with K-1 degree of freedom • K = number of sample • Conclusion • Take the table value from Chi 2 [k-1][α] • If calculated H value > Chi 2 [k-1][α] • We reject H0
  • 37. Use krushal wallis H test at 5 % level of significance if three methods are equally effective Method 1 99 64 101 85 79 88 97 95 90 100 Method 2 83 102 125 61 91 96 94 89 93 75 Method 3 89 98 56 105 87 90 87 101 76 89
  • 38. Step I • Null hypotheis • H0 : μ a = μ b = μc • Three methods are equally effective • Alternative hypothesis H1= at least two of the μ are different • Three methods are not equally effective • n1+n2+n3=30
  • 39. Step II Met hod 1 99 64 101 85 79 88 97 95 90 100 T1 Rank 24 3 26.5 8 6 11 22 20 15.5 25 161 Met hod 2 83 102 125 61 91 96 94 89 93 75 T2 Rank 7 28 30 2 17 21 19 13 18 4 159 Met hod 3 89 98 56 105 87 90 87 101 76 89 T3 Rank 13 23 1 29 9.5 15.5 9.5 26.5 5 13 145 n1 10 n2 10 n3 10
  • 42. • Df = K-1 =3-1=2 • Table value = 5.99 • Calculated value is 0.196 • Since the calculated H value • 0.196 < 5.99 • We fail to reject H0 • All the teaching methods are equal
  • 43. Friedman test • It is a non parametric test developed and implemented by Milton Friedman. • It is used for finding differences in treatments across multiple attempts by comparing three or more dependent samples. • It is an alternative to ANOVA when the assumption of normality is not met
  • 44. Friedman test • The test is calculated using ranks of data instead of unprocessed data • It is used to test for differences between groups when the dependent variable being measured is ordinal. • It can also be used for continuous data that has marked as deviations from normality with repeated measures.
  • 45. • It is a repeated measures of ANOVA that can be performed on the ordinal data.
  • 46. Descriptions and requirements • Dependent variable should be measured at the ordinal or continuous level • Data comes from a single group measured on at least three different occasions. • Random sampling method must be used • All of the pairs are independent. • Observations are ranked within blocks with no ties • Samples need not be normally distributed.
  • 47. Problem ordinal data is given .is there a difference between weeks 1,2,3 using alpha as 0.05 week1 Week 2 Week 3 27 20 34 2 8 31 4 14 3 18 36 23 7 21 30 9 22 6
  • 48. Steps • Define null and alternative hypothesis. • State alpha • Calculate degree of freedom • State decision rule • Calculate the statistic • State result • conclusion
  • 49. Step 1 • Null hypothesis • H0 there is no difference between three conditions. • Alternative hypotheis • H1 there is a difference between three conditions
  • 50. Step 2 • State alpha • 0.05
  • 51. Step3 • Degree of freedom’ • df=K-1 • K = no of groups • =3-1=2 • df=2
  • 52. Step 4 • Decision rule – chi square table Chi square is greater than 5.991 than you can reject the null hypothesis
  • 53. Step 5Rank the value Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 2 1 3 1 2 3 2 3 1 1 3 2 1 2 3 2 3 1 R=9 R=14 R=13
  • 54. Step 6 Calculation of statistics
  • 55. Step 7.state result • If chi square is greater than 5.991 than reject the null hypothesis. • Calculated chi square value is 2.33 • Calculated value is lesser than table value hence fail to reject null hypotheis. • Hence there is no difference among the three group.