1. MANAGING THE SEAPORT IN THEMANAGING THE SEAPORT IN THE
ERA OF LOCAL AUTONOMYERA OF LOCAL AUTONOMY
(WITHIN THE CORRIDOR OF LAW 32
YEAR 2004 CONCERNING LOCAL
GOVERNMENT
BY:
DR.MADE SUWANDI
Director of Local Government Function
Directorate General of Regional Autonomy
MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS

2. MANAGING THE SEAPORT IN THEMANAGING THE SEAPORT IN THE
ERA OF LOCAL AUTONOMYERA OF LOCAL AUTONOMY
(WITHIN THE CORRIDOR OF LAW 32
YEAR 2004 CONCERNING LOCAL
GOVERNMENT
BY:
DR.MADE SUWANDI
Director of Local Government Function
Directorate General of Regional Autonomy
MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS

3. THE AUTHORITY UPON SEAPORTTHE AUTHORITY UPON SEAPORT
1. UNDER LAW 32/2004 THERE ARE THREE CRITERIA
IS SET TO DETERMINE THE AUTHORITY TO
MANAGE SEAPORT; EXTERNALITY,
ACCOUNTABILITY AND EFFICIENCY
2. INTERNATIONAL AND NATIONAL SEAPORT: THE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
3. REGIONAL SEAPORT; PROVINCE
4. LOCAL SEAPORT; CITY OR DISTRICT

4. DISTRIBUTION OF GOVERNMENT
AUTHORITY
DEKONSENTRASI
PEMERINTAH
ADMINISTRATIF /
WILAYAH
• KANWIL/KANDEP
• KEPALA WILAYAH
• DLL
PEMERINTAH
PUSAT
DELEGASI
• OTORITA
• BUMN
• NUSAKAMBANGAN
• DLL
DAERAH OTONOM
PROPINSI
KABUPATEN/
KOTA
DESENTRALISASI
PRIVATISASI
• SWASTA MURNI
• BOT
• BOO
• BOL
• DLL

5. WHETHER LOCAL GOVERNMENT ISWHETHER LOCAL GOVERNMENT IS
ALLOWED TO MANAGE NATIONAL ORALLOWED TO MANAGE NATIONAL OR
INTERNATIONAL SEAPORTINTERNATIONAL SEAPORT
1. YES….. PROVIDED:
2. THE LG SHOULD GET THE APPROVAL FROM THE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT (MINISTRY OF
COMMUNICATION) SINCE IT IS THE AUTHORITY
OF CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
3. THE LG SHOULD FOLLOW NORMS, STANDARD
AND PROCEDURES SET BY THE CENTRE
INCLUDING CONVENTIONS SET BY THE IMO
4. THE LG HAS THE MANAGEMENT ABILITY TO
MANAGE THE SEAPORT ACCORDING TO
STANDARDS SET BY THE CENTRAL GOVT

6. LOCAL GOVERNMENTLOCAL GOVERNMENT
RELATIONS WITH PT.PELINDORELATIONS WITH PT.PELINDO
1. PT.PELINDO IS A STATE OWNED COMPANY
2. IT IS TREATED AS A PRIVATE COMPANY UNDER
LAW 1/1995
3. SINCE IT OPERATES IN THE TERRITORY OF LG,
IT SHOULD OBEY LOCAL REGULATIONS SET BY
THE LG UNDER LAW 32/2004
4. PT.PELINDO SHOULD GET LICENSES FROM THE
LG WHEN IT ESTABLISHES BUILDINGS,
ADVERTASIMENTS, RESTAURANTS, PARKING
LOTS, AND OTHER LOCAL FACILITIES WHICH
CAUSE LOCAL EXTERNALITIES

7. HOW THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENTHOW THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
HANDLES THE SEAPORTHANDLES THE SEAPORT
1. THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT MAY ESTABLISH
AN IMPLEMENTATION UNIT (UPT) TO HANDLE
THE PORT
2. THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT MAY ASSIGN THE
GOVERNOR TO HANDLE IT UNDER THE
PRINCIPLE OF DECONCENTRATION
3. THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT MAY ASSIGN THE
PROVINCE OR THE DISTRICT OR CITY TO
HANDLE IT UNDER THE PRINCIPLE OF
COADMINISTRATION (TUGAS PEMBANTUAN)

8. HANDLING NATIONAL ANDHANDLING NATIONAL AND
INTERNATIONAL SEAPORTSINTERNATIONAL SEAPORTS
1. TODAY IS THE ERA OF REFORMATION
2. DEMOCRACY IS THE MAIN AGENDA OF REFORMATION
AND THE REGIONAL AUTONOMY IS THE REFLECTION OF
DEMOCRACY
3. THOUGH THE NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL PORTS
BECOME THE AUTHORITY OF CENTRAL GOVERNMENT TO
HANDLE; IT WOULD BE WISER IF THE LOCAL
GOVERNMENT IS GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY TO HANDLE
THEM UNDER THE PRINCIPLE OF DECONCENTRATION OR
COADMINISTRATION
4. EMPOWER AND SUPERVISE THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT IN
HANDLING THE SEAPORTS
5. PRIORITIES SHOULD BE GIVEN TO BIG CITIES

9. CONDITIONS OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT TOCONDITIONS OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT TO
HANDLE SEAPORTSHANDLE SEAPORTS
1. CENTRAL GOVERNMENT SET NORMS, STANDARDS AND
PROCEDURES INCLUDING COMPETENCES IN HANDLING
THE SEAPORT
2. THE LGs WANT TO HANDLE SEAPORTS SHOULD MET THE
REQUIRED CONDITIONS
3. APPLY TIGHT SUPERVISION AND EMPOWER THE
CAPACITY OF LGs IN HANDLING THE PORTS
4. LGs HAVE NOT MET THE CONDITIONS SHOULD NOT BE
ALLOWED TO HANDLE PORTS AS IT MAY ENDANGER
NATIONAL CREDIBILITY IN IMO
5. DECENTRALISATION IN HANDLING THE PORTS WILL
EASE THE BURDEN OF THE CENTRE AND TEACHING THE
LGs TO HANDLE BIGGER PORTS

10. CONSEQUENCES OF LOCALCONSEQUENCES OF LOCAL
AUTONOMYAUTONOMY
1. THE NEED TO HARMONIZE LAW OF COMMUNICATION
AND LAW OF AUTONOMY
2. SINCE IT IS THE ERA OF REFORMATION; THE AUTONOMY
LAW BECOMES THE CORNERSTONE FOR THE SECTORAL
LAWS
3. THE MAIN DUTY OF CENTRAL GOVERNMENT WILL BE;
SETTING NORMS, STANDARDS, PROCEDURES, MONEV,
SUPERVISION AND FACILITATION INCLUDING
IMPLEMENTING GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS WITH
NATIONAL EXTERNALITIES
4. THE FUNCTIONS OF LGs WILL BE; IMPLEMENTING
GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS WITH LOCAL EXTERNALITIES
WITHIN THE CORRIDOR OF REGULATIONS SET BY THE
CENTRE

11. ANATOMI URUSAN PEMERINTAHAN
URUSAN PEMERINTAHAN
ABSOLUT
(Mutlak urusan Pusat)
CONCURRENT
(Urusan bersama
Pusat, Provinsi, dan Kab/Kota)
PILIHAN/OPTIONAL
(Sektor Unggulan)
WAJIB/OBLIGATORY
(Pelayanan Dasar)
SPM
(Standar Pelayanan Minimal)
- Hankam
- Moneter
- Yustisi
- Politik Luar Negeri
- Agama
Contoh: kesehatan,
pendidikan, lingkungan
hidup, pekerjaan umum,
dan perhubungan
Contoh: pertanian,
industri, perdagangan,
pariwisata, kelautan dsb

12. DISTRIBUSI URUSAN PEMERINTAHAN
ANTAR TINGKAT PEMERINTAHAN
Kriteria Distribusi Urusan Pmerintahan Antar Tingkat Pemerintahan :
1. Externalitas (Spill-over)
Siapa kena dampak, mereka yang berwenang mengurus
2. Akuntabilitas
Yang berwenang mengurus adalah tingkatan pemerintahan yang
paling dekat dengan dampak tersebut (sesuai prinsip demokrasi)
3. Efisiensi
 Otonomi Daerah harus mampu menciptakan pelayanan publik yang
efisien dan mencegah High Cost Economy
 Efisiensi dicapai melalui skala ekonomis (economic of scale)
pelayanan publik
 Skala ekonomis dapat dicapai melalui cakupan pelayanan
(catchment area) yang optimal

13. 1. Pusat: Berwenang membuat norma-norma,
standar, prosedur, Monev, supervisi, fasilitasi
dan urusan-urusan pemerintahan dengan
eksternalitas nasional.
2. Provinsi: Berwenang mengatur dan mengurus
urusan-urusan pemerintahan dengan
eksternalitas regional (lintas Kab/Kota)
3. Kab/Kota: Berwenang mengatur dan mengurus
urusan-urusan pemerintahan dengan
eksternalitas lokal (dalam satu Kab/Kota)
BAGIAN URUSAN PEMERINTAHAN YANG DILAKSANAKANBAGIAN URUSAN PEMERINTAHAN YANG DILAKSANAKAN
OLEH MASINGOLEH MASING--MASING TINGKATAN PEMERINTAHANMASING TINGKATAN PEMERINTAHAN
BERDASARKAN 3 KRITERIABERDASARKAN 3 KRITERIA

14. Hubungan Antar TingkatanHubungan Antar Tingkatan
PemerintahanPemerintahan
1. Adanya interkoneksi dan interdependensi antar tingkatan
Pemerintahan dalam mengatur dan mengurus urusannya.
Ada hubungan
interelasi dan
interdependensi
Contoh 1:
Urusan Pendidikan Dasar & SLTP 
Kab/Kota
Urusan Pendidikan Menengah oleh Provinsi
Urusan PT oleh Pemerintah Pusat
Contoh 2:
Jalan Kab/Kota oleh
Pemkab/Kota
Jalan Prov oleh Pemprov
Jalan negara oleh Pem. Pusat
Ada hubungan
interelasi dan
interdependensi

15. TERIMA KASIHTERIMA KASIH