The Controversial Source Of Nuclear Power

The Controversial Source of Nuclear Power
Nuclear Power is widely regarded as a viable choice in enabling sustainable development, especially
when renewable energy sources remain in their growing stage of development and distribution.
Nuclear Power has many benefits compared to f of However, nuclear power also remains one of the
most controversial sources of energy. The debates on it are mainly based along the lines of
environmental, safety and security.
History
Since 1939 when Hahn and Strassman found that fission released energy and neutrons to help
uranium nuclei to be a self–sustaining chain reaction that would lead to an enormous release of
energy (WNA), harassing nuclear fission become an important part in creating a nuclear bomb. The
government had control over all nuclear research and began the Manhattan Project. "In June 1942
the US Army took over process development, engineering design, procurement of materials and site
selection for pilot plants for four methods of making fissionable material" (WNA). Until after World
War II nuclear reactors were harnessing nuclear power for other reasons than for electricity. After
World War II the idea of using nuclear energy for good, rather than for war was a reason not to keep
all nuclear research controlled by military organizations. Electricity was generated for the first time
by a nuclear reactor on December 20, 1951 near Arco, Idaho.
Nuclear power uses Uranium. Mining is the only way to obtain Uranium–238 which is the naturally
occurring isotope
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Argumentative Essay On Nuclear Power
Global demand and consumption of energy is at an all time high; the world needs a safe, efficient,
clean, and high producing source of energy production. The solution is something we already use
for energy production, Nuclear power. From the beginning of nuclear energy there has been
concerns over the safety of the power plants and its impact on the environment. With climate change
and more accurate information on nuclear power the tide is shifting in its favor. This paper will
explore the positives of nuclear power, political change on nuclear power, safety of the energy
source and new technologies associated with the nuclear power process. Most importantly are the
risks associated with nuclear power worth it? Research suggests that nuclear power is safer now
more than ever and has less of an impact on the environment than coal or oil. Public support and
misconceptions over the years have been up and down due to political agendas and those who are
misinformed about nuclear power. Individuals who are involved in the energy field are in favor of
nuclear power and building more plants with newer technology. Nuclear energy has been around
longer than people think. In 1934 Physicist Enrico Fermi experiments in Rome showing that
Neutrons can split many kind s of atoms. In 1946 the Atomic Energy Commission was created to
explore peaceful uses of energy and nuclear energy development. In 1951 an experimental Breeder
reactor produced the first electric power from nuclear energy in

Nuclear Power: Cons Essay
Nuclear Power: Cons
Since the days of Franklin and his kite flying experiments, electricity has been a topic of interest for
many people and nations. Nuclear power has been a great advance in the field of electrical
production in the last fifty years, with it's clean, efficient and cheap production, it has gained a large
share of the world's power supply. However with the wealth of safer alternative sources of
electricity, the dangers involved with nuclear reactors to humans (ie. cancer) and past disasters such
as Chernobyl there are well based reasons not to pursue this energy source. New sources such as
fusion power, new studies concerning the health of nuclear by–products and scares of nuclear
accidents ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Using a thousand pounds of a substance to supply a 1000–megawatt power station for a year, such
figures will cause plummeting electricity prices and make fission plants far too expensive.
However, prices and efficiency are useless if the safety factor is abandoned. All three topics are
dealt with in fusion, that is why it is such a miracle. In fact, a meltdown in a fusion reactor is
impossible, which cannot be said for fission. "Compared with fission reactors the absence of
such fission products as radioactive iodine and cesium from the fusion cycle reduces the potential
hazard by more then a thousand–fold." (Dean, 84) This is accomplished because in a fission
reactor the fuel is formed in a solid form which must be cooled by water, and if water is unavailable
then a meltdown may occur. In a fusion reactor the fuel is a hot gas rather then a solid. Because of
this even with a complete loss of cooling the gas would cool as it hits the cold walls of the reactor
chamber. With future resources, some proven like solar others experimental such as fusion, there is a
wealth of possible energy sources.
However, new sources of energy will not reduce the risk of horrific fission disasters such as those at
Chernobyl or Three Mile Island. Past disasters such as Three Mile Island are well– based reasons to
reconsider nuclear technology. At the Chernobyl power station at 1:00

Essay Nuclear Power
Nuclear Power In a world of ever increasing population there is a need to find a way to provide
electricity for the world. There many different ways that electricity can be produced but some of the
options are better suited for the Central Valley than others. The debate over Nuclear power has been
growing for years and it is now time to create a more reliable power source for the Central Valley.
Nuclear power should be considered to be a reliable source of power for the central valleys growing
population. Nuclear power has been around for many decades and has provided reliable power to
the American people. The first reactor that was used to provide electricity was on December 20
1951(US). From that point on the industry has expanded ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
This is an easy and effective way to create electricity and can be used reliably without much cause
for concern. As seen in the diagram above the reactor in a nuclear facility is located inside of a
building. That building is created from reinforced cement and is made to hold the fuel in case of an
emergency.
The opponents of nuclear power claim that nuclear power is not safe and it puts the general
population at risk of radiation. They point towards the Chernobyl accident as reason that nuclear
power should not be allowed. The Chernobyl accident happened in 1986 in the Ukraine and was
devastating (Chernobyl). The accident occurred during a test and "By the time that the operator
moved to shut down the reactor, the reactor was in an extremely unstable condition (Chernobyl).
The result was the explosion of the reactor and the release of radioactive material into the
environment. Yet another example opponents point to would be the Three Mile Island nuclear power
plant failure. At the plant "equipment malfunctions, design–related problems and worker errors – led
to a partial meltdown of the TMI 2 reactor core" (backgrounder). This accident was the worst in the
United States and caused a review of nuclear power plants safety.
Opponents argue that another accident will happen and they do not want to go through another
accident like Three Mile Island or Chernobyl. Greenpeace has said that the use of nuclear power
would "result in a

Nuclear Power Plants
In 1942, Enrico Fermi successfully sustained a nuclear fission reaction and created the world's first
functional reactor. What his experiments, and those of earlier scientists like Otto Hahn and Fritz
Strassman, showed was that by splitting the nucleus of heavy radioactive elements (like uranium
and cadmium), energy is released, and the reaction could be designed to generate a sustained energy
source (Schlager & Weisblatt, 2006). Subsequent experiments illuminated the promise of nuclear
energy as a reliable alternative to coal, and scientists and economists praised it as the future of
energy. While nuclear power remains the most efficient form of energy (Nei.org, 2013), its early
proponents failed to take into account the potentially devastating effects of a power plant
overloading and exposing radioactive waste to nearby populations, and catastrophic events like the
Chernobyl and Fukushima disasters have substantially undermined the promise of Nuclear Energy.
The question of whether nuclear power will become the standard of energy production remains a
hotly debated topic among economists and environmentalists alike. The economic costs of nuclear
energy are vast, ranging from government oversights and barriers to entry, to variable human capital
costs and fiercely competitive substitutes. By analyzing the economics of the establishment of a
nuclear power plant, we can get closer to answering the question of whether nuclear power will
become the true future of energy. In the

Nuclear. What was the first thing that came to mind when you read the word Nuclear, Nuclear
missiles, Radiation, Everything bad in this world? I bet you didn't think of a revolutionary power
source that could help some of the world's problems like Power, Carbon emissions, Clean water,
Jobs and local economy. Nuclear energy is a very argued topic with People on both sides have come
to the table with very legit and convincing argument. Nuclear power plants and nuclear power is one
of or the best green energy sources for working to get of fossil fuel for the following reasons.
Nuclear power plants and nuclear power plants are one of the cheapest forms of green energy,
Nuclear power plants have the technology to burn most of the nuclear waste the plant creates,
Nuclear power plants are one of the most condense forms of fuel of all the power plants, And
nuclear power can be harnessed to do many other things
Nuclear power plants are one of the cheapest energy creators for how much energy the power plants
creates. In terms of energy Kilowatt hour is a unit of measurement for electricity. A kilowatt hour is
1000 watts an hour. Knowing that we can now I can show you how much coal and oil is to make.
For coal the cost to make a Kilowatt hour is more than a 2.07 dollars. And oil comes in at a 3.18 .
And natural gas is 3.52. Nuclear powers price is less than one cent which is significantly lower than
the competitors prices. Nuclear power is a cheap and can put out more clean and

Nuclear energy is a positive source of energy. These power plants are a great means of providing
energy to the whole world. In America alone, there are 61 nuclear power plants giving birth to 99
nuclear reactors. There has been an only major nuclear accident in the United States at Three Mile
Island in Pennsylvania. Throughout the world, there have only been two other nuclear disasters, at
Chernobyl, Ukraine in 1986 and at Fukushima, Japan in 2011.
Countries everywhere rely on nuclear energy to power their electricity, but many people are scared
these huge reactors. Should they be? Nuclear power plants are safe with the correct safety
precautions and designs put into place and they are the most proficient means of producing energy.
To put it bluntly, we need nuclear energy from these power plants and as far as technology goes
nuclear power plants are the best ways of producing this energy. Despite a few negatives the
positives of using nuclear energy greatly outweigh the negatives.
There is always a hazard when releasing radioactive materials from generating electricity with
nuclear power. However, engineers and scientist have developed designs and operations in order to
try and prevent any accidents and avoid major consequences to the public. Out of the three major
nuclear reactor incidents only one released immense radioactivity. Incidents that could occur in
nuclear power plants are low and continue to decrease. Much of this evidence points to the fact that
nuclear

The Fear and the Need for Nuclear Power
ïµ Introduction
Despite the fear of nuclear disasters and proliferation of nuclear weapons, the 435 nuclear power
reactors around the world produce approximately 16 percent of the world's electricity and 19 percent
of electricity in the United States (WIT, 2013). In a world increasingly affected by global warming,
with increasing energy consumption, it is important to acknowledge that nuclear power is a safe,
clean, reliable, and sustainable source of energy, unlike our presumptions. This paper analyzes
potential risks and benefits of nuclear power as a fuel source and why the United States should
continue nuclear power production.
ïµ How Nuclear Power Works
Natural uranium undergoes the steps of mining and milling, conversion, enrichment, and fabrication
to convert it from ore to fuel pellets. Uranium isotopes are enriched, separating the fissionable
uranium from the unfissionable, and a fuel fabricator presses it into fuel rods (WIT, 2013). The
atoms in uranium fuel are split apart to release heat energy, which makes steam and drives a turbine
to produce electricity. Used nuclear fuel is stored in a deep pool of water afterward (WIT, 2013).
Ther two types of commercial nuclear power plants are boiling water reactors and pressurized water
reactors. Out of the 100 reactors in the United States, 65 are pressurized water reactors and 35 are
boiling water reactors (IEA). Boiling water reactors heat the water in the reactor vessel directly into
steam while pressurized water

The Effects Of Nuclear Power On America
Nuclear Power in America
On Wednesday, March 28, 1979, around 4 a.m., there was a failure in the water pumps at the Three
Mile Island in Middletown, Pennsylvania. This led to a partial meltdown of a nuclear power plant.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Department of Health, Education and Welfare
(now Health and Human Services), the Department of Energy, and the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania all conducted particular studies of the radiological consequences of the accident.
Approximately two million people were estimated to have received an average of one millirem of
radiation, and there was a maximum dose to a person who was at the site of 100 millirem
("Backgrounder"). To put this into perspective, an exposure from a single chest X–ray is two to six
millirem ("Doses"). However, this put fear into the minds of politicians and others all across the
country. What the people do not know, though, is nuclear is better. Instead of using fossil–fuels and
wind power, America ought to switch to nuclear energy to power the country because it is safer,
cleaner, less expensive, and more reliable than the current ways of producing energy
The United States (U.S.) gets 84% of its total energy from oil, coal, and natural gas, all of which are
fossil fuels ("Fossil Fuels.") And in 2008, 49% of U.S. electricity came from just coal. This is
largely due to the abundant supply of coal in the U.S., and it is a relatively inexpensive energy
source. However, what are the costs of

Nuclear Power : The Chernobyl Disaster
The Chernobyl Disaster "After Chernobyl, thousands and thousands of people, if not millions, were
given a death penalty and had to pay the price..." (Wladimir Klitschko). On April 26, 1986, the
Chernobyl Power Station in Pripyat, Ukraine, was running low power tests when the reactor
overheated leading to an explosion and radiation releasing into the atmosphere. Despite this being
one of the most serious nuclear disasters in world history, causing great harm to the earth and life
around it, we now know more about the dangers of nuclear energy than ever before. It is very
important that we continue to strengthen our regulations to make nuclear energy a safe, reliable
energy source. After the intense battle of World War II, the Allied ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The pressure from the nuclear arms race affected both the US and USSR causing them to
miscalculate their nuclear reactor designs. In March 28, 1979, the US endured one of their biggest
nuclear power plant accidents in US history, Three Mile Island. The accident that occurred in
Middletown, Pennsylvania, was the result of a malfunction in Unit 2 reactor's cooling system. After
this event, the US realized that they needed to strengthen regulations and improve the safety of
nuclear energy. Unlike the US, the Soviet Union was more focused on passing up their opponent
rather than focusing on the safety of nuclear energy. In 1970, the Soviet Union started to build a
nuclear power plant 80 miles north of Kiev, Ukraine in a town called Chernobyl. After the launch of
Chernobyl, 3 km away, a new town called Pripyat was built to house the employees who operated
the new power plant. Sixteen years later, as Chernobyl was midway through of constructing their
5th reactor, the 4th reactor endured an explosion which led to the spread of large amounts of
radiation into the atmosphere as a result of poorly engineered designs. The Soviet Union used an
unusual designed reactor called, RBMK also known as LWGR (Light Water Graphite Reactor). The
Soviet–designed RBMK (reaktor bolshoy moshchnosty kanalny, high–power channel reactor) was a
pressurized water–cooled reactor with individual fuel channels and used

Nuclear Power And Nuclear Energy
On September 26th, Doctor Robert McTaggart came in and spoke to us about nuclear energy.
Nuclear energy uses the heat produced from nuclear transformations and reactions to power turbines
which create energy. A majority of the time, nuclear plants run off the fission of one of three
elements: Uranium 235, Uranium 233, or Plutonium 239. Something else that Dr. McTaggart said
that really stuck with me was that fissile isotopes like U–235 give off more energy than is put into
the system. Currently in the US, nuclear power makes up 8.3% of our country's total energy and all
of the energy produced goes towards the electric power sector, where it makes up 22% of the total
amount of electric power.
Some advantages to the use of nuclear energy are that it has a carbon footprint of zero, it creates
constant energy, and it has a low operating cost. With no incidents, nuclear power is very
environmentally friendly, with no emissions and lots of power capacity. It is also very efficient
because most of the time, the energy that is harvested out of nuclear fission is greater than the
energy put in. The same thing cannot be said for any other resource, renewable or not. Once they are
built, nuclear plants have a very low operating cost, making them economical after they are built.
Some disadvantages to nuclear power are waste issues, high cost of building a power plant, and
terrible ramifications is safety precautions are not met. The waste issues associated with nuclear
energy are not

The Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Power
Statement of intent – That Nuclear power is a great way to produce power and is not as bad as it is
said to be. This will be directed teens and young adults looking for a quick read in a small
informative magazine. The following piece of writing is about how nuclear energy is a good source
of power. This is important because of the growing population and the need for electricity. I am
writing this for teens and young adults as just a small informative. Splitting the atom is a
dangerous practice that can cause widespread destruction but when used properly it is the best
source of energy possible. Not only does this method create huge amounts of energy for the amount
of fuel required, but is also incredibly environmentally friendly with a very low impact. Nuclear
energy is not as dangerous as most people believe it is. You can disagree and say nuclear power
is dangerous but times have changed. Modern reactors and containment facilities are far safer and
more advanced now. Out of the thirty–three countries operating nuclear power plants, there have
only been three major accidents. These were Fukushima, Chernobyl and Three Mile Island. Only the
Chernobyl accident in 1986 had fatalities. In fact it had the only fatalities caused by a commercial
nuclear disaster. The reactors used at Chernobyl were the very flawed and poorly designed Soviet
reactor which were designed at the birth of the nuclear age. They were unable to cool themselves in
an emergency shutdown or stop of the

The City Is The Nuclear Power Plant
The day began like any other. A city full of life woke up to continue its normal routine. Early
morning sunlight glinted off of surroundings along the horizon. Shiny cars crawled through the
streets. Pedestrians exited their homes and walked along the sidewalks. Bright, luscious green trees
and colorful gardens lined the streets. Children crossed the roads to get to their favorite
playgrounds. Teenagers headed to the beaches that bordered a lake in the center of town. Massive
concrete flats, serving as apartment buildings, created grids throughout the city. As usual, workers
constructed new buildings for an ever growing community. A giant Ferris wheel, one of the city's
most iconic landmarks, towered over the fairgrounds in the distance. Statues stood in the many
public squares that occupied space between buildings. One of the most noticeable features of the
city is the nuclear power plant, centrally located near the middle of the metropolis. The town of
Pripyat, Ukraine, home to almost fifty–thousand people, was developing into a model city. Little did
the citizens know that their lives were about to change. In the case of the Chernobyl nuclear reactor
accident in 1986, the calamity came as a complete and utter shock to the people involved. Far too
often, this is also the case for individuals involved in other disasters. Lives are built for the purpose
of moving forward, and one unfortunate mishap can send them spiraling in the opposite direction.
Problematic factors that

Nuclear Energy : The Future Of Power
Nuclear Energy: The Future of Power
Energy runs the world. From cell phones to cars to computers, every technological advancement of
the last millennium is dependent on one basic fundamental: the need for energy. However, within
the last century, a global energy crisis has shocked the earth. Current power production methods
pollute the environment, tearing ecosystems apart and destroying species. A clean, renewable, and
powerful energy source is needed to survive. Nuclear energy is this source. The field of nuclear
power is a modern, rising newcomer; however, nuclear energy is not as prominent within the energy
industry as it must be. To truly stamp in change, the U.S government must grant more funds towards
nuclear research and nuclear energy production must increase. Nuclear energy is the ultimate power
source because it boasts only a minimal impact on the environment, leaves little waste, and is safe
for humans.
Nuclear Energy: The Modern Power Source
Nuclear energy stems from the splitting of a uranium atom, which releases a powerful, hidden
energy. The energy produces steam, which in turn drives a turbine connected to an electricity
generator, and thus creates power (Landau NP).
Despite the long–held myth that nuclear energy production causes its surroundings to wither away
into a radioactive wasteland, nuclear energy actually has a very minimal impact on the environment
around it. Unlike fossil fuel plants, nuclear power plants do not directly emit harmful

After the invention of the atomic bomb in WWII, nuclear power has since then been manipulated
and harnessed for energy purposes, with the first nuclear power plants built in the 1950s. The first
wave of support for nuclear energy as a viable and sustainable source that could lead to energy
independence occurred around the early 1970s. After Three Mile Island and Chernobyl occurred in
1979 and 1986, respectively, public support for nuclear energy fell. Concerns of global climate
change and pollution lifted the public opinion once again until the Fukushima incident (Moniz). In
fairly recent years, the search for a cleaner, more sustainable source of energy has been on the
agenda of global leaders as the demand for energy increases. The need for energy independence for
many nations has also raised support for nuclear energy, combined with the finite supply of fossil
fuels, much of which is not an abundant resource in certain areas of the world. Though having been
in existence and in use since the 1950s, nuclear energy is still a highly debated form of energy today
largely due to the dangers it may pose as demonstrated with the events of Three Mile Island,
Chernobyl, and Fukushima. As the global issues of climate change, pollution, and fossil fuel
depletion arise, the need for a sustainable energy source is high on the agenda of many countries;
nuclear energy is an option to consider. Though there are many other options of renewable and
nonrenewable sources of energy, nuclear

Nuclear Power Argumentative Essay
From the electricity that kept my home warm and powered the lights at school to providing
employment to both my parents for the past 30 years, nuclear power has been at the center of my
life growing up. In Wadsworth, Texas, the South Texas Project Nuclear Operating Company has
been a way a life thousands of people by providing nearly 1200 jobs and providing carbon–free
electricity for over 2 million people. However, this is just one example in just one state in the United
States. According to the Nuclear Energy Institute, 11 percent of the world's energy comes from
nuclear power plants and for 13 countries it provides more than 25 percent of their country's energy.
However, even though nuclear power has made its mark as a global competitor in the realm of green
energy, incidents such as 3 Mile Island, Chernobyl, and Fukushima have created a global sense of
uneasiness. On top of this underlying fear, the huge building costs of new nuclear plants has lead to
a stunt in the growth of nuclear energy even though operation costs for nuclear energy at
$0.0219/kW is less than that of coal ($0.023/KW) and almost half that of gas ($0.0451/kW) (IER).
Even though nuclear energy has had some setbacks, it is still safer (short–term and long–term) than
the carbon–producing alternatives. The question at hand is whether we should take an utilitarian
perspective by giving more serious consideration to the long–term effects of the carbon–emitting
energy sources and whether we can overcome our

Nuclear Power And Nuclear Energy Essay
When clean and renewable sources of energy are discussed, the focus is usually centered around
energy productions like solar and wind. But an important source of energy is often overlooked,
nuclear energy. The viability of nuclear power plants has been a topic of debate since their
inception, with many both for and against it. Many countries are broadly opposed to nuclear energy
with poor public opinion resulting in the decommissioning of nuclear power plants in their country.
With the potential dangers of nuclear energy and the historical disasters that have accompanied it,
many are resistant to continuing its development. For my paper I will be addressing why even with
historical catastrophes, forgoing nuclear energy would be a mistake.
In comparing different forms of energy, a comparison must be made between nuclear and coal. It is
already widely known that the burning of coal in factories has a negative impact on the environment
and is one of, if not the most, destructive. But what is not widely known is that coal plants emit
more radiation into the environment than nuclear power plants. In fact, coal plants release 100 times
more radiation than nuclear power plants (Hvistendahl). This is because within coal are trace
amounts of the two radioactive elements uranium and thorium. When coal is burned it produces fly
ash, which concentrates the uranium and thorium at up to 10 times their original levels
(Hvistendahl).
But the negatives of coal don't need to be addressed

Persuasive Essay On Nuclear Power
Although nuclear power cost the least for the amount of power it makes, it is still very expensive. To
make nuclear power you have to build a nuclear power plant. To build a nuclear power you need
millions of dollars. Not only that, you have to also run the nuclear power plant. To run a nuclear
power plant you need to either mine the uranium and then refine yourself, or buy the uranium from
another company. Once you have done this you need to run everything in the power plant, which
cost money, and then pay your workers. Also when creating nuclear energy you create radioactive
waste which need to be stored far away somewhere, under surveillance, to make sure that it does not
ruin the environment. The owner of exelon, the one who owns Three Mile Island, said that they
have lost around 800 million dollars in recent years. If exelon decided to change their mind they
would end up losing even more money and eventually have to shut down. People may argue that
this is unfair to the workers but it's not. If exelon does shut down three mile island all the people
working there will lose their jobs, but exelon would probably do something about that. Exelon is a
fairly large company and owns many different power plants in other states. If a worker was willing
to move they would be fine, but if they didn't exelon could offer them a severance package. A
severance package is a package in which the worker receives pay and benefits from their
employment after they leave. Environmental

Nuclear Energy And Nuclear Power
New energy sources are invested in every year to produce heat and electricity for the citizens of the
United States. However, nuclear power is becoming a much more urgent discussion topic. Nuclear
power, or the use of nuclear fission to generate heat and electricity, contributes to nearly 20% of the
electricity generated and used in America. According to the Department of Energy, the United States
has invested 60 years of their time into nuclear power! But why have we done so? Well, the
production of nuclear energy helps produce reliable, low–carbon energy, and supports national
defense activities. Additionally, the Department of Energy also works to advance nuclear power as a
resource capable of making magnificent contributions in ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
According to Science Daily, these programs may have a link back to the development of the atomic
weapons in 1945. Due to this link, the atomic weapons have remained classified until the 1958
Atoms for Peace Conference in Geneva. Iter.org stated that 5,000 scientists, government officials,
and observers from both the east and the west had come to the old League of Nations building and
the nearby exhibition hall that had been constructed especially for the first nuclear world fair to bear
witness to revelation of nuclear research. In fact, it was stated that the Atoms for Peace conference,
or the Second United Nations for International Conference on the Peaceful Uses of Atomic Weapons
was recorded as the largest international gathering to ever focus on the potential of taming nuclear
weapons for peaceful purposes.
On the other hand, fission is the process where an atom splits into two parts, either through natural
decay or when stimulating within a lab, it releases energy. Due to the bombardment by other
subatomic particles known as neutrinos or radioactive decay, the nucleus is able to split. The
resulting pieces have less united mass than the original nucleus. Furthermore, the missing mass is
converted into nuclear energy. Unlike fusion energy, fission energy has a much different origination.
In 1938, Otto Hahn and Fritz Strassman, a pair of German physicists bombarded a uranium atom
with

Nuclear Power Is A Technology
Your document is pasted below. If you have any questions, please use the contact form on the
website, as replies to this email address cannot be retrieved.
––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
Nuclear Power
Nuclear power is a technology that has enormous benefits for humankind. As the demand for energy
is only continuing to grow, it has become important to develop energy technology that has good
yield and minimal negative side effects. After the harnessing of the atom for use in nuclear weapons,
the knowledge of how to exploit the atom became incorporated in nuclear power plants (Corradini
1). These use uranium fuel in a process that releases tremendous amounts of energy to be captured,
but also that creates minimal waste and other byproducts. Despite these, the benefits of nuclear
energy outweigh any disadvantages, as seen by its high energy output, reliability, and minimal
environmental impact when compared to energy sources such as fossil fuels. Due in large part to its
high energy output, nuclear power is a feasible and practical technology for meeting the world's
energy needs. For example, global energy demand has been continually increasing, with a 66%
growth between 1980 and 2007; this demand is expected to increase by 40% by 2030 (World–
Nuclear.org). As a testament to nuclear power's utility as an energy source, it currently provides a
large amount of global electricity: nuclear power met 20% of the global demand of electricity as of

Nuclear Power Is The Best Source Of Power Essay
Mickey Eovine
O'Sullivan
1st
January 22, 2016
Nuclear Power
Just about every part of today's society involves energy of some sorts. But as our society progresses,
the need for better, more efficient power sources must be addressed. Out of all of the choices, the
most popular to date is nuclear power. Nuclear power is a growing industry that is getting mixed
reviews from various sources. But which side is right? Is nuclear power the future? Or is it just
another problem the world will have to deal with? The answer is simple. Nuclear Energy is the
future and will power almost the entire world one day. Nuclear power is the best source of power
because it produces lots of power, it produces clean energy, it is cheap, and it is sustainable. Before
that though, a bit of history about nuclear energy. In 1789, Uranium was discovered by a German
chemist named Martin Klaproth. Later on in 1902 Ernest Rutherford, discovered how radioactivity
as a spontaneous event emits an alpha or beta particle from the nucleus that creates a different
element. In 1919 he wanted a better understanding of atoms, so he fired alpha particles from a
radium source into nitrogen and found that nuclear rearrangement was occurring, with formation of
oxygen. Niels Bohr also did work to help better understand the work of atoms in the 1940s (Perera).
Nuclear fission (the process that generates nuclear power) was discovered by Lisa Meitner and Otto
Frisch. They were studying a puzzling result

The Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Power
TMI has provided electricity since 1979. The Exelon Corporation might shut down the plant. There
are many pros to nuclear power and many cons. I think we should keep the plant open. Here's why,
if we close the plant, employees will lose their jobs. Also, nuclear energy is clean energy. If we close
TMI down, then it would take years to build a new kind of energy source. You wouldn't like it if you
lost your job, would you? No, because that would be terrible. Think what would happen if you lost
your job. They wouldn't make money for a while, till you found another job. Finding another job
quickly might be hard. What if you are the only parent and you don't have a husband/wife to make
money for your family while you look for another job. In addition, if you shut down the plant, then
there would still be waste still left behind. Who knows what that would do to our
economy/environment. If you just let the waste sit there, it could eventually run off into the water
and kill organisms living there. Also, it could soak into the ground and kill organisms there and
demolish plants that are growing there or could possibly grow there. As you see, waste that just sits
there will just ruin things. So why not make the waste a little more environmentally friendly and
keep it stored in the perfectly fine power plant. 19.5% of electricity is nuclear. If you take that away
from people, they will not be happy. People use it because it is clean energy. When you take that
away, you are left with other resources that will pollute the air when used. Also, 38.8% of electricity
is coal. Coal is not very environmentally friendly. Keeping TMI open, would give people a reason to
use clean energy, nuclear energy. Some people might not want to keep it open. Some reasons are
that it's too expensive and it could be dangerous. People are worried that there will be a dangerous
accident and everyone near TMI will have to move and evacuate. Since the time TMI has started
producing energy, we have made many safety precautions and have never had a deadly accident
before. Exelon Corporation has been keeping the citizens of the PA safe from the nuclear
energy/waste, so there is no need to worry. TMI isn't making enough money to run the

Providing nearly two–thirds of America's energy, nuclear power is stated to be the cleanest, most
reliable sources of energy known to man. Nuclear power, although a high–maintenance system, has
many beneficial characteristics that help support the idea that nuclear energy has the capability of
supporting Earth's future generations with power. Nuclear power is a healthier alternative to the
environment as it produces no greenhouse gases and uses no nonrenewable resources to produce its
power. Although there are many benefits to nuclear energy, the power plants of which the power is
produced in must be run in an orderly function– with consequences of mistreatment leading to
disastrous situations with the potential affecting many. Despite the fact mishandling nuclear power
can lead to catastrophe, nuclear power has many benefits on the environment due to the idea fact
that nuclear power does not create any greenhouse gases, and uses no nonrenewable resources to
create its energy.
Nuclear energy can be a brilliant alternative to nonrenewable resources however, it can lead to a
disaster of epic proportions when something goes wrong. Nuclear energy relies largely on human
interactions within the plant, which has been proven to lead to complications with drastic
consequences. In 1986 the world's largest nuclear power incident took place at the Chernobyl
nuclear power plant as "the result of a flawed reactor design that was operated with inadequately
trained personnel." ("Chernobyl

Nuclear Power And The Chernobyl Accident
Since the first commercial plant in the 1950s, the nuclear energy sector has increased steadily. From
generating 684 billion kilowatt hours worldwide in 1980, nuclear power accounted for 2,345 billion
KWh in 2012 (World Bank, n.d.). While the Chernobyl accident in 1986 did not trigger any decline
in the global nuclear–generated power in the following years, the Fukushima accident in 2011 did. A
drop of almost 200 billion KWh from 2011 to 2012 put a hold on the previously roughly constant
numbers. This decline is already visible in the 2011 data, as Japan immediately ordered a shut–down
of all their 50 reactors, the last one in 2012 (Hong, Bradshaw, & Brook, May 2013). Today 31
countries operate 438 commercial nuclear power plants (IAEA – PRIS, 2015a). The following table
shows the operating and under construction reactors in the world, including their current percent
share in their total electricity generation.
Country Operational Reactors Reactors under construction Nuclear electricity generated in 2014 (in
% of total) No. of units Net capacity (MW) No. of units Net capacity (MW)
Argentina 3 1627 1 25 4.1
Armenia 1 375 30.7
Belgium 7 5927 47.5
Brazil 2 1884 1 1245 2.9
Bulgaria 2 1926 31.8
Canada 19 13500 16.8
China 23 19007 26 25756 2.4
Czech Republic 6 3904 35.8
Finland 4 2752 1 1600 34.7
France 58 63130 1 1630 76.9
Germany 9 12074 15.8
Hungary 4 1889 53.6
India 21 5308 6 3907 3.5
Iran 1 915 1.5
Japan 48 42388 2 2650 0.0
Korea, Republic of 23 20717 5 6370 30.4

Nuclear Energy : Nuclear Power
Countries have different availabilities of types of energy and in order to reach its energy
requirements a country needs to use an energy mix to meet its energy needs. An energy mix could
be composed of fossil fuels such as coal oil and gas renewable resources such as hydro geothermal
and solar or even nuclear energy. In Japans energy mix in 2013 only 1% was nuclear energy
however a plan has been set so that by 2030 20% to 22% of japans nuclear mix would be nuclear
energy (World–nuclear–news.org, 2015). In Korea's energy mix from 2014 13% of Korea's energy
mix is nuclear energy and Korea also has a goal to increase its nuclear power usage by 2035 to go
up to 29% (Eia.gov, 2015). This means that Korea and Japan both want to increase the ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
As well as this it could also be said that nuclear power plant cost more to run as when they've
expired they have to be renewed which also costs a lot of money. I believe that Japan and Korea
should use nuclear energy as they energy mix as nuclear energy has become more safe and stable
and there are increased amounts of checks. It is unfair to put more of a strain on certain countries for
not having their own source of energy therefore nuclear energy should be used as part of the energy
mix with the consent of the citizens in both countries.
Nuclear energy has been a big part in Japan & Korea's energy mix as it enables both countries to
become more independent with their source of energy as they no longer have to rely on imported
energy such as oil from other countries. By using nuclear energy Japan and Korea have a constant
supply of energy for the country so they no longer have to think about the risks such as an energy
shortage or increased amount in importing different sources of energy. This means that through the
use of nuclear energy or higher amounts of nuclear energy usage Japan and Korea will have a more
sufficient supply of energy to use within their country. (Min and Chung, 2013 p.1)
Nuclear energy would benefit Japans

Nuclear Power Essay example
Since the end of the last century, the development of modern technology and science has played a
significant role as measure to resolve energy crisis and global warming issues which resulted in life
sustaining remedies and causes of mass destruction. However, many scientists agree that the earth's
fossil fuel supplies are dramatically depleting and this challenge will be a meaningful hurdle for
future generations. Therefore, many countries may need to find new productive energy sources in
order to tackle this problem. Many proponents of nuclear power suggest that the benefits of nuclear
power could be capable of alleviating climate change crisis due to its cost–effective and capability
to supply the world's energy needs. In contrary, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This essay will argue that nuclear power will not be a sustainable energy source of 21st century for
three main reasons. These include high cost of generating nuclear power, health effects of radiation
and long–term impact of radioactive waste on the environment as well as present its disadvantages
and compare it to renewable energy sources of solar power and wind power.
Public perception on nuclear energy is much influenced by subjective impressions mostly formed
through sensational and dramatic news of mass media or anti–nuclear groups. However, nuclear
experts, those who have more relevant knowledge and information about nuclear energy, may have
reasonable opinion based on scientific facts or inferences. Thus their opinion and consensus should
be examined and taken into account during the process of nuclear energy policy formulation. For the
purpose of eliciting experts' opinion, the web–based on–line survey system (eBOSS) was
developed. Using the survey system, experts' views on nuclear energy were tallied, analyzed and
compared with the public's. Based on the survey results, the paper suggests some recommendations
about the future direction of the public information program in Korea.
First of all, it would appear that the obvious drawback of nuclear power is its high economic cost
such as the coat of building a nuclear reactor

With the ever increasing population, [energy demand, and the need for alternative resources
continues to increase.] Nuclear energy comes up as a strong contender by being clean, sustainable,
and more consistent moreover than others in the renewables category. Even though those in the
energy industry argue that the use of nuclear plants provides a stable source of power in a clean and
renewable matter, in areas where other resources are available, the potential threat of nuclear
meltdowns outweigh the positive benefits of nuclear energy as cleanups cost billions because of
decontamination and unusable land so the number of nuclear power plants should be restricted so
the risk of national and worldwide economic damage is minimized. Advocates of nuclear energy
argue that the use of nuclear power plants provides a clean and consistent source of energy. Laurel
Sheppard (2008) is, a writer and editor with a Bachelor of Science in ceramic engineering from
Ohio State University., Iin her cover story, "Is Nuclear Power the Answer to U.S. Energy Needs?"
for the American Ceramic Society Bulletin, she recognizes a significant advantage of nuclear energy
"is that it emits no air pollutants or greenhouse gases." It is true that not releasing greenhouse gases
is a huge plus for nuclear energy as a resource, especially during modern times with climate change
issues. However, nuclear energy comes with its own set of environmental impacts. Aside from the
destructive environmental impact from

The Power of Nuclear Engery
Atoms for Peace One of the biggest issues we face in the 21st century is how we can produce energy
for our rapidly growing energy needs effectively. There are many sources we can obtain energy
from to fulfill our needs such as coal, oil, natural gas, nuclear and alternatives like wind, solar,
geothermal, hydroelectric, and biofuels but all of these sources have their negatives. Whether it's the
cost of a project, the negative environmental affects, or even the appearance of certain facility.
Nuclear energy can be the greatest and most beneficial energy source for the United States. There is
no doubt energy is an important resource. We use energy in every aspect of our lives. In the year
2010 the whole world used a total of 511 quadrillion British thermal units of energy and of the 511
quadrillion "The United States' primary energy consumption was nearly 98 quadrillion Btu, nearly
19% of world total primary energy consumption" (U.S. Energy Information Admin.). To put things
into perspective 1 quadrillion Btu equals 45 million tons of coal or about 172 million barrels of
crude oil. So the United Sates would have used 4.4 billion tons of coal or about 17 billion barrels of
crude oil in 2010 alone. As population grows the demand for "energy consumption will grow by 56
percent between 2010 and 2040" (U.S. E.I.A.). With demand expected to grow that much within the
next 30 years, it is essential we build a sturdy foundation to prepare us for the future. Like all energy
source

Nuclear Plant : The Environmental Effects Of Nuclear Power...
Chernobyl, Three Mile Island, and the Fukushima Daiichi plant are a few of the many nuclear
power plants around the world. At some point in time, these three plants have been more dangerous
than predicted. The radioactive gases these plants contain have detrimental effects to the body and
the environment. In contrast, while the radiation is contained, nuclear power plants are healthy for
the environment. Nuclear power plants are considered to be environmentally friendly because they
produce the least amount of greenhouse gases. However, even though these power plants are better
for nature, they can also damage it. Nuclear power plants are a hazard to all living organisms on
earth and should no longer be in use. They are unsafe because they can have a meltdown, crack, or
the reactors could explode, which will release radiation. The radiation leak can do damage to people
and their habitat located nearby. Abolishing nuclear power plants will prevent potential catastrophes
in the future. Nuclear power plant's radioactive gases can cause numerous fatalities and damage to
the surrounding communities, which can be deemed uninhabitable if radiation were to be leaked.
One way a radiation leak can happen is if they crack due to aging structures or the fractures can be
caused by natural events such as earthquakes, tsunamis, and tornadoes. In March of 2011 the
Fukushima Daiichi plant was cracked by the massive earthquakes and tsunamis that occurred in
Japan. The radiation affected

Nuclear Power Is A Technology
Nuclear Power
environmental impact when compared to energy sources such as fossil fuels.
Due in large part to its high energy output, nuclear power is a feasible and practical technology for
meeting the world's energy needs. For example, global energy demand has been continually
increasing, with a 66% growth between 1980 and 2007; this demand is expected to increase by 40%
by 2030 (World–Nuclear.org). As a testament to nuclear power's utility as an energy source, it
currently provides a large amount of global electricity: nuclear power met 20% of the global
demand of electricity as of 2008 (Abu–Khader). This power generation is spread across 30 countries
and is a result of 436 nuclear power plants (Adamantiades). The 20% figure also represents the
United States' dependence on nuclear power for generating

Nuclear Energy : Nuclear Power Plants
For the past 50 years, the United States has been using nuclear energy as one of it's main non–
renewable energy sources. The source of nuclear energy comes from nuclear power plants, which
efficiently generates large quantities of energy and has low greenhouse gas emissions, compared to
traditional coal power plants. Currently, there are 61 nuclear power plants operating in the U.S. and
using nuclear power plants as a main energy source has always been a controversial problem within
U.S. society. By the time nuclear power plants bring people convenience, they bring more
disadvantages instead. Nuclear electric power generation uses thermal energy that is created by
nuclear fission, which is similar to thermal electricity power generation in coal power plants.
Compared to coal power plants, nuclear power plants have extremely low greenhouse gas
emissions; such emissions are the main factors in the increasing climate change today. The public
and the government both want to decrease our greenhouse gas emissions, so nuclear energy would
be the best option in that sense. But replacing all coal power plants is unrealistic, so more nuclear
power plants have arose to solve this issue. Secondly, scientists and researchers have already
invested time and money in the nuclear generation technology needed to make power plants. With
the knowledge of nuclear technology, we are able to generate more efficiently with methods in
nuclear power plant development. A main advantage of nuclear

Nuclear Power Essay
Nuclear Power
As our population increases, so will our demand for electricity. Air conditioners, computers,
televisions, microwaves, and many other appliances have become necessities for Americans. All
methods of producing electricity have drawbacks. As the earth becomes warmer, we must look for
ways to decrease our use of fossil fuels. There are several ways to produce electricity without
releasing air pollution. The most feasible method at this time is nuclear energy. Nuclear energy
presents a safe, clean, and inexpensive alternative to other methods of producing electricity. Nuclear
waste can either be reprocessed or disposed of safely, provided certain precautions are taken.
Radiation
Properties
In order to understand the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Another example is x–rays, which have become a valuable medical diagnostic tool. However,
overexposure to x–rays can increase a person's cancer risk or even cause immediate death (Taylor,
1996).
Average annual exposure from various sources
The average American's exposure to radiation (82%) comes primarily from natural sources. Fifty–
five percent comes from radon, which is given off by radium, a component of soil and rock.
Americans receive a smaller percentage of radiation from other terrestrial sources, such as uranium
in the soil, and from cosmic rays. Eleven percent of natural radiation exposure is internal, primarily
from radioactive potassium in our bodies. Eighteen percent of American's radiation exposure comes
from man–made sources such as x–rays, nuclear medicine, and consumer products, much of which
is the necessary byproduct of beneficial products and procedures. Americans receive only 0.1% of
their total radiation exposure from nuclear energy production. This figure includes exposure from
mining, milling, reactor operation, transportation, and waste storage. Interestingly, Americans
receive 0.5% of their total radiation exposure from the radioisotopes released into the atmosphere
from coal–fired power plants. We actually receive five times as much radiation from coal–fired
power plants as we do from nuclear power plants (Taylor,

Nuclear Power Essay
environmental impact when compared to energy sources such as ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
In addition to this, the usage of nuclear power is expected to expand in the future. In order to keep
up with the aforementioned rising global energy demand, electricity generated via nuclear power is,
by 2030, projected to increase by 29% from the 2.7 trillion kilowatt–hours of energy generated in
2006 (Adamantiades). This increase will be footed by the creation of new nuclear power plants all
around the world. For example, the United Nations has been approached by "more than 40
developing countries, ranging from the Gulf to Latin America," about beginning nuclear energy
programs. As well, 21 new reactors are under construction and 150 are being planned in Asia.
Further plans exist or are being discussed to increase the nuclear energy output of countries such as
Brazil, Argentina, and Mexico (Adamantiades). Overall, the high output of nuclear energy is
providing and will continue to provide a practical energy source which can fill the global energy
demand. Another primary component of nuclear power's appeal is its high energy density; that is,
the fuel used for nuclear power can generally produce more electricity than can be produced by an
equivalent amount of fuel in a different power plant technology. For example, coal–fired plants,
which meet the most of the global energy demand, are capable of generating 0.35 megawatt–days of
electricity for every metric ton of coal burned. By

Nuclear power is harnessed from the energy retained inside of an atom's nucleus. This energy bindes
the atom together and, when released, can be used to produce electricity. In order for this energy to
be released, however, it must be subjected to either nuclear fusion, the combination of several atoms
to form one larger atom, or to nuclear fission, the division of larger atoms into several smaller
atoms. Nuclear power plants, first introduced in 1954, use this second method in the production of
electricity. Inside of a nuclear power plant, uranium atoms are split and their nuclear energy
released, creating the heat necessary to produce the steam that powers turbine generators and create
electricity. Nuclear energy is often referred to as a "clean" energy source because, unlike fossil fuels,
its production does not result in the generation of greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide,
methane, sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen oxides. Many endorse the use of nuclear energy because it is
efficient, providing large amounts of energy in exchange for small amounts of fuel, reliable, as it
can be produced almost all day and night, year round, and affordable, costing about 2.4 cents per
kilowatt–hour in 2012 compared to fossil fuels, which cost about 3.27 cents per kilowatt–hour in
2012. However, the use of nuclear power also has several significant disadvantages. Its main
downside lies in the threats nuclear power plants present in the forms of radioactive waste and
nuclear meltdowns.

The Effects Of Nuclear Power On The World
Attention Step
I. [Attention Getter] The average global temperature has increased by more than 2oF
over the last century and the years 2005 and 2010 are tied for the warmest years on
II. [Credibility] Growing up as kid, I never thought that the world we live in was ever
A. Then, once I started going to college, I was immediately got exposed to the
B. With the knowledge I gained from my classes and from my work experience at a
danger that our world faces due to the effect of global warming caused by the use
nuclear power plant , as well as the research I have done for this speech, I am
aware of the immediate attention that global warming requires and how the use of
nuclear power to produce electricity is more preferable than coal power plants.
Engineering on May 2015 and I will start working at Palo Verde Nuclear
Generating Station on June 2015.
C. I will be graduating with Bachelor of Science in Nuclear and Mechanical
III. [Topic Justification] The probability of you or someone you know to use electricity
on a daily basis is very high.
A. Electricity is used by many people for different purposes that can range from as
B. My audience survey revealed that 100% of the people who took the survey agreed
C. Most people have little knowledge about nuclear power and how it can help

IV. [Preview] Today I want to persuade you to support the use nuclear power to produce
A. First, the use of coal is causing global warming throughout the world.
B.

Koodankulam Nuclear Power Plant
KOODANKULAM NUCLEAR POWER PLANT
Koodankulam Nuclear Power Plant is a nuclear power station currently under construction in
Koodankulam in the Tirunelveli district of the southern Indian state of Tamil Nadu. Project
investment cost to India was estimated to be US$ 3.5 billion in a 2001 agreement.
History
An Inter–Governmental Agreement on the project was signed on November 20, 1988 by Prime
Minister Rajiv Gandhi and Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev. The project remained in limbo for
10 years due to political and economic upheaval in Russia after the post–1991 Soviet breakup, and
also due to objections of the United States on the grounds that the agreement does not meet the 1992
terms of the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG).[2]
There are ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
However, the present Tamilnadu government have defended the Koodankulam project
INDIAN REACTORS ARE SAFE, SAYS SCIENTIST–'INDIAN NUKE POWER PLANTS SAFE'
Bangalore: Japan's killer earthquake that caused a nuclear reactor to shut down and a radiation scare
are unlikely to negatively impact India's ambitious nuclear power programme, says a nuclear
scientist and former official of the atomic energy regulatory board (AERB)"I honestly am not
worried about the Japanese incident casting a 'scientific' shadow in India," K.S. Parthasarathi, who
was until recently the secretary of AERB, told IANS. "I know the country will stand it."
The committee was set up in the wake of the nuclear disaster in Japan, triggered by an earthquake
and a tsunami simultaneously hitting the Fukushima nuclear power plant on March 11, 2011 The
committee, appointed by the Atomic Energy Regulatory Board (AERB) of India in March, put out
the a bare–bones report earlier this month. The final detailed report is still under AERB review. He
said the Kudankuam site was in a very low seismic category zone and that the

Nuclear Power : The Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Plants
TMI has been providing electricity since 1979. The Exelon Corporation might shut down the plant.
There are many pros to nuclear power and many cons. I think we should keep the plant open. Here's
why, if we close the plant, employees will lose their jobs. Also, nuclear energy is clean energy. If we
close TMI down, then it would take years to build a new kind of energy source. You wouldn't like it
if you lost your job, would you? No, because that would be terrible. Think what would happen if
you lost your job. They wouldn't make money for a while, till you found another job. Finding
another job quickly might be hard. What if you are the only parent and you don't have a
husband/wife to make money for your family while you look for another job. In addition, if you
shutdown the plant, then there would still be waste still left behind. Who know what that would do
to our economy/environment. If you just let the waste sit there, it could eventually run off into the
water and kill organisms living there. Also, it could soak into the ground and kill organisms there
and demolish plants that are growing there or could possibly grow there. As you see, waste that just
sits there will just ruin things. So why not make the waste a little more environmentally friendly and
keep it stored in the perfectly fine power plant. 19.5% of electricity is nuclear. If you take that away
from people, they will not be happy. People use it because it is clean energy. When you take that
away, you are

"Even when nuclear energy is produced without incident, the science itself creates vast quantities of
toxic waste, which is impossible to discard" (Dupea, n. pag.). Because of the fact that there is no
way to safely dispose of nuclear energy and waste, many issues have arose. There are many more
safe and more reliable sources and ways to produce energy that involves less risks. Countries need
to eliminate the use of nuclear energy due to the problems it causes. Some of the largest issues with
nuclear energy are the building process of nuclear power plants is expensive and time consuming,
there are many safety concerns and the potential risks to people and the environment. Due to the fact
that nuclear power plants have extra building components for safety, they take a long time to build
and it is very expensive. It is not worth the issues it can cause. The structure of nuclear power plants
require extra precautions due to the environmental risks. As Alex Rich states, "The method by which
nuclear plants create power is no different from coal or oil plants. Due to the danger of radiation
poisoning, the infrastructure of nuclear plants is quite different from other types of power plants
incorporating concrete radiation shields enclosed by steel containment fields" (n. pag.). Since they
have to take these extra precautions to ensure safety, the structure costs more to build. As Michael
Bloch states, nuclear power plants can take decades to build and it's by all means a short

Nuclear Energy And Nuclear Power
"In March 2011, an earthquake and tsunami hit Japan causing a nuclear accident at three Fukushima
Daiichi reactors. The accident caused three nuclear meltdowns and the release of radioactive
materials" ("Nuclear Energy"). This accident is the exact type of incident that often holds people
back from an environmentally friendly energy source. This article goes on to say that everybody in
the area was evacuated and deaths were only results of the natural disasters and not the nuclear leak.
Additionally, accidents have occurred in many other companies that do not use nuclear power, yet
they have had higher death totals. Along with these points, nuclear energy has many positive
aspects. For example, nuclear energy use has benefitted ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
As global warming becomes an even greater problem and efficient sources of energy are hard to
find, nuclear energy has increased in popularity. For example, "Global climate change and depleting
stores of fossil fuels have brought the need for new energy sources to the international stage. US
president Barack Obama publicly supported the creation of new nuclear power plants in the United
States as an alternative to fossil fuels" ("Nuclear Energy"). Also, as the years go by, nuclear energy
is becoming a source that unites many nations around the world. For example, last year the global
community came together in Paris, France, where leaders and representatives from almost every
nation discussed the problem of global warming and what the world can do to slow this increasingly
dangerous issue. The main goal was to knock down the net of carbon emissions released into the
atmosphere to zero. Although many thought that this would be impossible, after much discussion
they realized that it would not be too difficult by using nuclear energy. This plan has proven to be
effective by both France's and Sweden's dramatic drop in carbon emissions by using nuclear energy
(Newsela Staff). Therefore, with global warming increasing, and there being a lack of alternative
energy sources to which to turn, nuclear power is becoming increasingly popular globally due to its
many benefits

The Controversial Source Of Nuclear Power

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Erica Smith

More from Erica Smith (10)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

The Controversial Source Of Nuclear Power