2. Fig. 1. Designed model of Grid-Tied PV
phase VSI the dc-link voltage is controlled for interconnection
with grid. The internal loop controls the real (Id) and reactive
(Iq) components of utility grid current as depicted in Figure 2.
Though, the external loop is for maintaining the dc-link
voltage to +/- 250V through two split capacitors as total
reference dc line voltage is maintained to 500V. Moreover,
the reactive current component i.e. Iq is kept equal to zero to
achieve unity power factor. The external or current controller
outputs in the d-q frame i.e. Vd and Vq are converted into
three modulated waveforms, then these modulated signals are
used by pulse width modulation (PWM) generator. The overall
parameters of the proposed model are given by Table I.
The designer given parameters of PV module used by
proposed system are voltage and current at maximum power
point (Vmp, Imp), short-circuit current (Isc), no-load voltage
(Voc) and temperature coefficient. For a specific temperature
of PV cell Imp, Vmp, Isc and Voc are adjusted by changing
saturation current of diode (Isat), small resistance in series
(Rse), high resistance in parallel (Rpr) and photo-generated
current (Iph) for a single PV module while considering quality
factor (Qd) of diode for a semiconductor.
Equation (1) below gives the diode characteristics of PV
module:
Ic = Iph −
Isat
exp
V + IcRse
VT
− 1
+
V + IcRse
Rpr
(1)
Here, Ic is the Output current (A) of PV cell, Isat is the
Diode’s reverse saturation current equal to 5.261e − 09 A, Ipt
is the Insulation current = 5.956A, Rse = 0.0832 ohms, Rpr =
8191 ohms, and VT is the Thermal voltage derived by equation
(2) below:
VT =
KT
qQdNprNse
(2)
Here, K is the Boltzmann constant (1.3805 × 10−23
j/k), T
is the Absolute Temperature = 25 °C, Qd is the Quality factor
of the diode= 1.252, q is the Electronic charge (1.602×10−19
C), Npr is the Number of strings in parallel = 66, and Nse
are the cells in series/string= 5.
III. CONTROL AND FRT STRATEGY
In the recent decade, different types inverter control schemes
have been presented due the various Grid-Tied PV inverter
topologies. The control scheme block in PVS is responsible to
handle the electrical variable such as real and reactive current,
synchronism of the grid, maintain power factor to unity and
positive sequence. The newly designed strategy here is the
proportional-controller (PI) in combination with bridge-type
fault-current limiter (BFCL). The designed strategy can take
care of PVS during both normal and abnormal conditions.
A. Proportional-Controller (PI)
The control scheme i.e. PI, for grid connected VSI is
illustrated by Figure 2. The external loop gives current outputs
Authorized licensed use limited to: NUST School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (SEECS). Downloaded on August 29,2022 at 10:56:45 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
3. Fig. 2. Control scheme for the Grid-Tied VSI
as Id component and Iq component of current in synchronous
d-q frame. Due to simple control and measurements d-q
frame is used instead of natural frame. However, the external
controller‘s one output i.e. Iq is set to zero to obtain unity
power factor. Considering the internal loop which is also
known as current control loop gives output voltage in the form
of d-q as Vd and Vq. These signals are then converted in three
modulating waveforms that are further used by pulse-width-
modulation generator.
B. Fault Ride Through (FRT) Scheme
All over the world a large amount of money is being in-
vested for installation and reliable operation of power systems.
So, every possible effort is carrying out to protect the power
system during any abnormal condition. Therefore, different
FRT schemes are designed to minimize the amplitude of fault
current and enhance voltage during any abnormal situations
for the reliable and stable operation of the system. This article
presents a new and efficient FRT scheme as BFCL to restrict
the LVRT capability of the PVS within grid requirements.
Additionally, the behavior of the conventionally used crow-
bar scheme is carried out under comparison to justify the
efficient response of our proposed BFCL scheme.
1) Crowbar Scheme: The conventionally used crowbar cir-
cuit includes pure resistance in the path of fault current [11].
The crowbar strategy consists two power electronic switches
that operates on the basis fault detection mechanism as by
Figure 3. Only one switch will be on at a time i.e. with fault
or without fault switch depending of the system condition, is it
a fault or not? When the fault detection mechanism senses any
fault so instantly the ”with fault switch” is triggered to include
resistance the fault current and simultaneously ”without fault
switch” goes off. These two switches are electronic DIAC
switches used to conduct for both positive and negative half
cycles of AC signal.
2) Bridge-Type Fault-Current Limiters (BFCL) Scheme:
The fault variables are optimized to approximately nominal
values with minimum ripples through BFCL scheme.
Fig. 3. Crowbar Scheme
Fig. 4. BFCL Scheme
Authorized licensed use limited to: NUST School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (SEECS). Downloaded on August 29,2022 at 10:56:45 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
4. The BFCL scheme is the combination of two ways i.e. shunt
path and bridge path [12]. The bridge path is followed by
current in normal i.e. without fault condition, which is com-
prised of four bridge diodes (D1 to D4) responsible to pass the
positive and negative cycle of alternating variables. The small
dc reactor (Ldc) comes in shunt with a freewheeling diode
(Df ) are then connected in series with a semiconductor switch,
as shown by Figure 4. A negligible amount of resistance is
added in series as inheritance resistance of the inductor i.e.
(Rdc). Moreover, the shunt path is a branch of resistance (Rsh)
in series with inductance (Lsh). This path is used by the power
flow during abnormal conditions, which is the in shunt with
the normal path (bridge path) [13], [14].
IV. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The environment used for application of 100-kW Grid-Tied
photovoltaic system is Matlab/Simulink. The behavior of fault
variables for the PV system is simulated and investigated for
designed PI controller and BFCL as FRT scheme. The effects
of fault variables are analyzed at two different locations i.e. at
PCC and at 5-km of from PCC. Additionally, for verification
of the proposed FRT scheme, a comparative analysis is also
carried out with conventionally adopted FRT scheme i.e.
crowbar.
A. Unbalance Faults at PCC
Unbalance faults are put at 0.1s and cleared at 0.25s at
PCC. Performance of the designed scheme in comparison with
conventionally adopted schemes is elaborated below.
The dc-link voltage behavior during the single phase-to-
ground (P-G) and phase-to-phase (P-P) faults are shown by
Figure 5. The newly designed BFCL in coordination with PI
as inverter controller (PI+BFCL) gives a robust and optimized
performance throughout the fault time. The proposed strategy
gives less spikes during fault occurring and clearing time.
It also results in a minimum overshoot and undershoot as
compared to crowbar-based approaches. Although, the double
phase fault results in severe rise as compared to a single-phase
to ground fault. However, the behavior of the proposed scheme
gives robustness for the phase to phase fault. Moreover, at
the start of simulations, PI+BFCL results with low transients,
comparatively.
The inverter‘s real (Id) and reactive (Iq) current compo-
nent responses in the dc frame i.e., d-q frame is depicted
by Figure 6. During both unbalanced faults, the proposed
designed approach authenticates the minimum oscillations and
low surges in currents. This is because of the inductive effect
of proposed BFCL as compared to the pure resistance-based
crowbar. Although, during phase-phase fault proposed scheme
shows an optimum response as, it is a severe fault compared
to P-G fault. Moreover, as mentioned before, the reactive (Iq)
component is kept at zero for the sake of unity power factor
achievement. However, the distortions in Iq component of
current with proposed PI+BFCL, which shows little spikes for
both P-G and P-P faults, as by in Figure (c) and (f).
(a)
(b)
Fig. 5. DC-link voltage behavior for P-G (a) and P-P (b) at PCC.
B. Unbalance Faults at 5-km Distance
The simulated variables at distance of 5-km from PCC are
less more affected than the fault type. The little variations with
respect to distance are because of the inclusion of 5-km extra
line resistance. A negligible rise in voltage and a decrease in
currents are resulted even though the overall behavior is the
same as in PCC. However, for convenience, Dc-link voltage
and reactive current behavior during the P-G and P-P faults
at the 5-km from PCC is given by Figure 7. Which give
negligible variations during fault due to the line impedance.
V. CONCLUSION
This paper concentrates on the improvement of LVRT
capability of the Grid-Tied PV system, referred to the existing
grid codes. The designed BFCL in combination with PI
control (PI+BFCL) is affectively tested and compared with a
conventionally using crowbar circuitry. A prominent response
is achieved at both locations i.e. at PCC and at 5-km away
from PCC. Additionally, it is observed that the parameters of
grid connected three-phase PVS are less affected with respect
to fault distance and more with respect to fault type.
The designed scheme authenticates robust, smooth and a
fault tolerant behavior of PVS under both normal and fault
conditions. Soon, the designed strategy will be experimentally
validated by using the Delfino Texas Instrument or DSP
(TMS3200F28335) control boards.
Authorized licensed use limited to: NUST School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (SEECS). Downloaded on August 29,2022 at 10:56:45 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
5. (a) (b)
(c) (d)
(e) (f)
Fig. 6. Active (Id), reactive (Iq) currents in (a, b, c) and (d, e, f) during P-G and P-P fault, respectively.
TABLE I
MODEL PARAMETERS.
Parameters Values
Switching-frequency of inverter 2 kHz
Full -load current of grid 2.94 A
Algorithm used for MPPT Incremental conductance
Temperature 25°C
Sun irradiance for PV 1000 (W/m2)
PV power 100.6 kW
Full-Load current of PV 364 A
Operating-frequency 50 Hz
converter frequency 5 kHz
Link-voltage (Vdc) 500 V
Grid-voltage 20 KV
Choke-impedance (R, L) 2 × 10−3 ohm, 2.5 × 10−6 H
PV module output voltage 273 V (L-L, rms)
REFERENCES
[1] I. Öhrlund, ”Future Metal Demand from PV Cells and Wind Turbines
- Investigating the Potential Risk of Disabling a Shift to Renewable
Energy Systems,” STOA Unit, European Parliament, 2012.
[2] G. M.Masters, Renewable and Efficient Electric Power Systems, Wiley
Inter science, John Wiley, 2004.
[3] P. Mohanty, ”Control strategies for distributed generation based micro-
grids”, Ph.D Thesis, Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi,India, 2012.
[4] F. Iov, A. D. Hansen, P. E. Srensen, and N. A. Cutululis, ”Mapping
of grid faults and grid codes,” Tech. Rep., Ris National Laboratory,
Technical University of Denmark, 2007.
[5] E. ON GmbH, ”Grid CodeHigh and extra high voltage,” http://www.eon-
netz.com/.
Authorized licensed use limited to: NUST School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (SEECS). Downloaded on August 29,2022 at 10:56:45 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
6. (a) (b)
(c) (d)
Fig. 7. Dc-link voltage (a, c) and Iq current (b, d) during P-G and P-P fault at 5-km from PCC.
[6] M. Braun, G. Arnold, and H. Laukamp, ”Plugging into the Zeitgeist,”
IEEE Power and Energy Magazine, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 6376, 2009.
[7] Comitato Elettrotecnico Italiano, ”CEI0-21: Reference technical rules for
connecting users to the active and passive LV distribution companies of
electricity,” http://www.ceiweb.it/.
[8] M. Tsili and S. Papathanassiou, ”A review of grid code technical
requirements for wind farms,” IET Renew. Power Gener., vol. 3, no.
3, pp. 308 332, Sep. 2009.
[9] Cardenas, R. Pena, R. Alepuz, S. Asher, G. Overview of control system
for the operation of DFIGs in wind energy application. IEEE Trans. Ind.
Electron. 2013, 60, 27762798.
[10] I. V. Banu and M. Istrate, ”Modeling of maximum power point tracking
algorithm for PV systems,” Electrical and Power Engineering (EPE),
2012 International Conference and Exposition on, pp. 953-957, 2012.
[11] Islam, S.U.; Zeb, K.; Din, W.U ”A Novel Design of FRT Strategy and
Proportional Resonant Controller for Three Phase Grid connected PV
System”IEEE International Conference on Power Generation Systems
and Renewable Energy Technologies, pp 1-6, 2018.
[12] Naderi, S.B.; Jafari, M. Impact of bridge type fault current limiter on
power system transient stability. In Proceedings of the 7th International
Conference of Electronic Engineering, Bursa, Turkey, 4 December 2011;
pp. 14.
[13] Islam, S.U.; Zeb, K.; Din, W.U.; Khan, I.; Ishfaq, M..; Hussain, A.;
Busarello, T.D.C.; Kim, H.J. ”Design of Robust Fuzzy Logic Controller
Based on the Levenberg Marquardt Algorithm and Fault Ride Trough
Strategies for a Grid-Connected PV System”.Electronics2019,8, 429.
[14] Islam, S.U.; Zeb, K.; Din, W.U.; Khan, I.; Ishfaq, M.; Busarello, T.D.C.;
Kim, H.J. ”Design of a Proportional Resonant Controller with Resonant
Harmonic Compensator and Fault Ride Trough Strategies for a Grid-
connected Photovoltaic System.”Electronics2018, 7(12), 451.
Authorized licensed use limited to: NUST School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (SEECS). Downloaded on August 29,2022 at 10:56:45 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.