Green Revolution Essay

The Green Revolution Essay
The green revolution is generally used to explain the application of modern, western–type farming
techniques to less economically developed countries. The Green Revolution
====================
The green revolution is generally used to explain the application of modern, western–type farming
techniques to less economically developed countries. To implement The Green Revolution change
needs to occur in three main areas, Biochemical, MechanicalandSocial. Each of these three changes
need three innovations and each causes three main consequences. To implement Biochemical change
there needs to be use of Hybrid seed selection causing increased yields of wheat, rice and maize.
Fertilizers are used to increase yield and...show more content...
The Green Revolutionbegan in Mexico, when after world war two the country had major problems
with food shortages. New hybrids of wheat and maize were developed, these new varieties were
dwarf plants capable of withstanding strong wind, heavy rain and disease, which had been the major
cause of the food shortages. When this project started they had no intention of trying to transform the
agriculture of other third world countries but, when the yields of wheat and maize increased by three
and two times respectively, the seeds were taken to the Indian subcontinent.
In 1964, farmers in India were short of food, lacked a balanced diet and had an extremely low
standard of living. The government had two choices either redistributes the land or improve the
technology used by the farmer. They chose the latter and the green revolution began.
Eighteen thousand tones of Mexican HYV wheat seeds were imported as well as large amounts of
fertilizers. Tractors were imported to replace water buffalo. Communications were improved and
there was some land consolidation.
Later new rice varieties were developed in the Philippines, most famously the IR–8 variety which is
famous for increasing yields six fold in its first harvest. Since then further improvements have
decreased the growing season required, allowing for extra rice craps to be grown, and made strains
tolerant to a less than optimum
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

The Green Revolution During The 1960's
During the 1960s, there was a "sharp increase" in crop production which came to be known as the
Green Revolution. This increase in crop yields was due to the advancements in plant breeding and
the use of modern agricultural techniques. The Green Revolution intended to increase the food
supply in order to reduce the risk of famine (intended outcome 1), and with the surplus they were
able to export the excess (intended outcome 2). However, there were also some unintended
outcomes. Two of these were salinization, and the artificial fertilizers that were used harmed the

The Green Revolution Essay
Broad Topic: The Green Revolution
Narrowed Topic: Pesticides and the Green Revolution: The impact on the environment and counter–
measures. The green revolution technology phenomenon started in Mexico over sixty years ago. The
technology which is still relevant today has, forever changed the way agriculture is conducted
worldwide. According to Wilson (2005), green revolution technology "involved using high–yielding
varieties (HYV) of seeds, pesticides and fertilizers in addition to irrigation" (para. 4). The
technology was used mainly to boost the production of wheat and rice, so that developing countries
could keep up with the growing demand of their rising population. The process has led to significant
increase in...show more content...
One of the most worrying concerns for farmers associated with green revolution farming is
probably the health risk, associated with prolonged exposure to pesticides. Wilson (2005) cited
Wilson and Tisdell (2001), calls our readers' attention to the fact that "insecticides are the most
frequently used pesticides and are known to be toxic to humans, wildlife and the environment"
(para.6). Toxic residue adds up over the years and can lead to long term and short term, chronic
illnesses and life long complications and is even known to cause death. Furthermore, farmers who
get ill from exposure to pesticides often suffer from, headaches, skin rashes, nausea, twitching of
muscles, chest pains and a host of other illnesses. This has led to various stakeholders amplifying
the need, for a new approach to pesticides usage. Shaebecoff (1983) highlighted the challenges of
enforcing safety regulations in regards to the use and banning of pesticides, while Tillman (1998)
called for the need of high–intensity agriculture with fewer environmental costs. However,
established pesticide regulatory levels for intentional and unintentional presence of pesticides, are
often not enforce, and where there are enforcement, fines for breaches are usually negligible.
Regulations or not, it is imperative that farmers take some ownership of their own health, and
employ every precautionary

Negative Effects Of The Green Revolution
The Green Revolution, which spanned across the mid 20th century from about the 1930s to the
1960s, encompassed a time when mass production, agricultural advances and the speed at which
livestock were raised drove the production of food to a level which had never been seen before
(Simmons). During these three or four decades, the production of food skyrocketed for multiple
reasons such as advancements in how livestock was raised, pesticides, fertilizers and artificial
selection (Simmons). Although there were some negative effects of the Green Revolution, such as
the loss of polycultural production or a decreased quality of food, there were far more positive
effects upon the world and its people, such as an increased availability of food, the decline of world
hunger, an eventual increase in world population and general world stability (Simmons). The Green
Revolution was brought upon by a combination of advances, one of these being the application of
mass production and fordism to the production of crops. Before crops were produced on a large
scale, most crops production were polycultural, or on a small scale, but with diverse types of food
(Simmons). After the Green Revolution, crops were produced monoculturally, meaning only stable
foods were produced, but on a far larger scale with the same type of plant spanning across large
areas of land (Simmons). Although monocultural production seems as if it can always produce more
food, there are some risks involved. For instance, if

The Pros And Cons Of The Green Revolution
Introduction: The Green Revolution was a research and development initiative aimed to increase the
number of crop yields from the years between 1930–1960 and the subsequent years following them
which resulted in the adaptation of various technologies leading to the invention of high–yielding
varieties of seeds, fertilizers, pesticides and new irrigation methods. It has facilitated socio–economic
changes which have helped in preventing natural calamities due to the ever–increasing world
population and has provided people with an option of self–sustaining and reduced poverty. The
Green Revolution was a joint venture between the Ford Foundation and the Rockefeller Foundation
while Dr. Norman Borlaug, the father of the Green Revolution has been...show more content...
These credit institutions mortgaged lands to farmers which in turn proved beneficial for these
institutions as they could acquire these farms if the farmer was unable to the pay the loan
(Ponting, 2007). One of the major advantages of the Green Revolution was that it increased the
use of machinery on the farmlands (Bruce Koppel, 1987). Conclusion: Thus, it can be clearly said
that the Green Revolution replaced, "one way of life with another within a short span of two
decades." due to its massive agricultural developments (Parayil, 1992). It was a major achievement
when it was implemented in the developing countries as it gave them a sense of food security after
the end of the World War–2. It got many people out of poverty and hunger and while this was
focussed on, it also dropped down the prices for food, increased migration, generated employment
and the increased economy as well. Agriculture research still needs new research to tackle the
upcoming problems related to increasing yields to feed the ever–growing population and growth of
food for the developing countries. Add to that, globalization and trade will make food prices less
liable to local food produce and agriculture will not be as important for people

The Revolt Against the Revolution
Throughout the world, the effects of the Green Revolution can be seen in the dramatic increases in
crop production of multiple developing countries. This has in turn, allowed these developing
nations to be able to feed their populations, but at a cost. As discussed in lectures the Green
Revolution has its benefits, but also has its cons that many have expressed concern about. Some of
these concerns are why opponents reject the Green Revolution as they state it is more harmful than
any benefits it brings. In the US News article "The Toxic Consequences of the Green Revolution", a
group of these rejectors are shown to be farmers from the small Indian state of Punjab who state that
the usage of Green Revolution...show more content...
The controversies that arose with the Green Revolution pesticide and fertilizer techniques of the
2008 article are rising again in this 2016 article, only the perpetrator has changed from the
chemical usages of the Green Revolution to the side effects of GM seeds in India. The GM seeds
that are covered in the 2016 article are cotton seeds that have been modified to reduce the need of
pesticides and increase yield such that India is expected to become the largest producer of cotton
surpassing China. These GM seeds seemingly fixed the overuse of chemical that was required in
2008 as the article from then said they might, but that was only a temporary fix. These seeds still
contain the same financial and debt problems that came with the Green Revolution. Even more
worrisome is the fact that the pesticide usage reduction that the cotton GM seeds began to be less
effective. Pest became resistant to the pesticide strand of cotton to such an extend that pesticide
use have increased to almost twice of what it was in 2008 when the 2008 article stated the worries
of the Punjab farmers. These worries still exist as with increase use of these pesticide chemicals, so
will there be an increase in the health worries of 2008, such that they may be even

Causes Of The Green Revolution
The Green Revolution occurred around the 1940s, this was right after WWII had ended so many
countries were not doing so well economically and this affected their agricultural abilities. During
this time new technologies, to speed up the process of growing food, were introduced. Things such
as fertilizers, pesticides, and modern irrigation systems were implementing into farming around the
world. The Green Revolution was caused by the lack of enough food to support the growing global
population , particularly in less developed countries, and the threat that this posed on the surrounding
more prosperous countries. It yielded results, helping to feed many starving people in the world, but
consequently it appeared to ruin some farmlands. Natural farming in years to come and negatively
affected certain groups of people.
The green revolution was caused, for the most part, by the lack of a substantial food supply for the
world population. As Dr. Norman Borlaug said, there were billions of people in the world who were
constantly plagued with hunger. They did not have the proper conditions or nutrient rich soil that are
necessary for growing enough crops to sustain themselves. Dr. Borlaug was involved in the research
for the Green Revolution, he predicted that unless the methods of the Green Revolution were "fully
implemented", then the results would not suffice, and the starving population would remain hungry.
(Doc 2). President Truman expressed similar sentiments about the world

The Green Revolution
In the Industrial Revolution big core countries developed quickly due to their wide use of coal and
them implementing its uses to improve their everyday life. Due to the use of coal factories could
produce more and more finished products which brought down the overall price of goods which
made things more affordable to everyone. The Green Revolution brought many advancements
towards societies in developing countries for many reasons. The new science advancements being
made in agriculture along with investment from other countries and private companies led to the
economic growth of the country. Overall, these advancements lead to the Green Revolution being a
big success in developing countries. Although, many people will argue that the Green Revolution
wasn't a success in the developing countries and negatively affected the economic status and
environmental safety of the country. Many people say that the green revolution only benefited the
rich people, who are in charge, by getting them richer and the poor laborers only getting poorer. They
also bring up that the run–off from the pesticides used to artificially make the crops went into the
rivers and polluted the clean drinking water for the lower–class people leading to many new diseases
spreading. However, science advancements in the field of agriculture and the overall economic
growth of the whole country helped the Green Revolution be a success. The world was struggling
with a need for a mass production of food to

Introduction
The development of modern crop varieties for developing countries began in a concerted fashion in
the late 1950s. Food prices rose after World War 2 due to rapidly increasing population and the
reduced availability of land in many countries. The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United
Nations coordinated wheat and rice breeding schemes. They key break–through was the
development of short, fertilizer–responsive rice and wheat varieties. These varieties were resistant to
disease and insects and were used as model plant types for breeders to adapt to local conditions.
The first users of the wheat and rice varieties were in India, Malaysia and Pakistan in 1965
(Evenson, 2003). They produced spectacular increases in yield...show more content...
However in South Asia, the poorest areas that relied on rain–fed agriculture were also negatively
affected by the Green Revolution, suffering widening interregional disparities and an incidence of
poverty that still remains high. According to Pingali (2012) the new technologies bypassed the poor
for a number of reasons such as inequitable land distribution with insecure ownership and tenancy
rights; poorly developed input, credit, and output markets and policies that discriminated against
smallholders, such as subsidies for mechanization or crop and scale bias in research and extension.
Environmental Effects
The availability of cereal varieties with multiple resistance to diseases and insects reduced the need
for application of agrochemicals thereby enhancing environmental quality in farming communities.
However intensive agriculture during the Green Revolution brought significant land and water
problems relating to soil degradation over exploitation of ground water and soil pollution due to
the uses of high doses of pesticides and fertilizers. According to Singh (2000) about 60% of the
geographical area in India faces soil degradation which threatens food security for the future.
The Future
In the 1990s, the rate of growth in food–grain production has been lower than the rate of growth in
population (Khush, 1999). If this trend is not reversed, serious food shortages will occur

Green Revolution Pros And Cons
World population has been increased significantly, while Earth resources are limited and food
sources are in danger. In this regard scholars predicted that world's population would be reached
around 10 billion by 2050 and certainly food requirement would be increased more than 70%
(Dyson, 2016).These statistical data imply that food sources are increased arithmetically, while
population are enhanced geometrically, whereas there should be a balance between population and
food supply (Brownell, 2008).To overcome food shortage, some attempts have been done around
half century ago which led to green revolution. This paper, aims to have a look on this
phenomenon, introduce it and assess pros and cons of it. In this essay, initially, we have a quick
look on nature and evolution of green revolution. Secondly, pros and cons of this phenomenon would
be discussed and then more holistic solutions for improving this process would be introduced as a
real green revolution. Finally, whole materials would be concluded. Worth to mention that one
advantage...show more content...
In this regard, studies show that famine has been reduced 20% in this period (Brownell, 2008), food
supply raised 12–13% between 1960 and 1990, whereas without the new technologies food
production were decreased around 20% and price was increased 35–65%. The other research in Asia
shows that with 1% increase in production, the numbers of poor people decrease by 0.48% (Pingali,
2012). Furthermore, green revolution has had a great influence on labor's life and provided
opportunities for them to improve their life. In fact, this revolution has affected labors in some terms
such as employment and wage. As I noted above, green revolution has increased productivity, so
bulk density of generated plants enhance the need for extra labors for fertilizing, transplantation and
weeding (Das,

Green Revolution
[pic]
The world's worst recorded food disaster occurred in 1943 in British–ruled India. Known as the
Bengal Famine, an estimated 4 million people died of hunger that year in eastern India (which
included today's Bangladesh). Initially, this catastrophe was attributed to an acute shortfall in food
production in the area. However, Indian economist Amartya Sen (recipient of the Nobel Prize for
Economics, 1998) has established that while food shortage was a contributor to the problem, a
more potent factor was the result of hysteria related to World War II, which made food supply a low
priority for the British rulers.
When the British left India in 1947, India continued to be haunted by memories of the Bengal...show
more content...
By the 1990s, almost 75% of the area under rice cultivation in Aisa was growing these new
varieties. The same was true for almost half of the wheat planted in Africa and more than half of
that in Latin America and Asia, and more than 50% of the world's corn as well. Overall, a very
large percentage of farmers in the developing world were using Green Revolution seeds, with the
greatest use found in Asia, followed by Latin America.
NEW
WHAT IS IT?
в™¦
"The Green Revolution is the development and introduction of high–yielding varieties (HYVs) of
rice and wheat into many
LEDCs."– GCSE Geography
Revision Guide.
в™¦
It aimed for three thins, which
HISTORY
The Green Revolution originally began in India.
Back in 1943, in eastern India where
Britain was still ruling, the world's worst record of food disaster occurred– the
Bengal Famine, where approximately 4 million people starved to death. As this was during the
World War 2, food shortage in India was the least of the
Britain's problems.
So, when they left in 1947, India's main priority was food production as they were still suffering
from the pain that the Bengal Famine caused and this is how the Green Revolution began. It spread
from 1969 to 1978, which
WHERE DID IT AFFECT GLOBALLY?
в™¦

In Punjab and Haryana in northern India, yields of rice and wheat tripled
в™¦
Crop

A Brief Look at the Green Revolution
Seeking a prosperous farming lifestyle takes effort and ambition to achieve. Plowing farmland and
planting seeds by hand are examples of what farmers cope with on the fields. These tasks are time
consuming, labor intensive and not rewarding. To make matters worse, harvesting crops rarely gives
farmers anything in return, which makes their work frustrating. Farmers who sacrifice their labor to
a non–rewarding job is a serious issue in agriculture. Fortunate enough, an American scientist named
"Norman Borlaug" found a solution to the problem by developing a movement termed the "Green
Revolution" (Briney, 2008). Starting in the 1960s, this movement encouraged nations around the
world to use "high yielding seeds and chemical infused fertilizers" to increase their productivity on
farms, thus leading to a more rewarding lifestyle (Curran, 2013). Together, these materials made up
the American way of farming, and the results made significant changes to agriculture. Farmers who
adopted the American farming methods of the Green Revolution experienced immediate results from
their farmlands. For example, during the 1960s, farmers from India participated in the Green
Revolution by abandoning their traditional farming methods in exchange for American farming
methods (Zwerdling, 2009). No longer were Indian farmers using "cow dung" as compost and
growing usual crops such as "beans and vegetables" (Zwerdling, 2009). Instead, they used artificial
fertilizers and high yielding seeds, such

Causes And Effects Of The Green Revolution
When people discuss the Green Revolution they are talking about the quick adoption of new
technologies and the introduction of new scientifically bred crop varieties. The Green Revolution
took place due to inadequate amounts of food, depleted land, and economic poverty. Many changes
occurred as a result, some being positive and some being negative. A positive effect of the Green
Revolution was an increased amount of food being available for the population. However, the
reduced availability of nutritious crops, water shortages, and increased tensions and conflicts
deterred some gains of the movement. Because of this, the Green Revolution was more harmful than
helpful. There were many major issues around the world that brought around the start of the Green
Revolution. One major cause was the inadequate amount of food in relation to the population. In
Doc. 1, a graph is provided that compares the wheat yielded in Mexico and India from 1950–2010.
From 1950–1970, the graph shows that Mexico's crops yielded low amounts of wheat. For India,
the graph shows that the crops yielded low amounts of wheat from 1965–1985 which was after the
Green Revolution began. The purpose of this graph was to provide the statistics on wheat yielded
and how it changed over the decades. The intended audience of this graph was the scientists who
wanted to see the progression before and after the revolution. This graph is significant to the topic
because it shows that the low amount of wheat yielded

Positive Effects Of The Green Revolution
The term Green Revolution was first used in 1968 when people realized that a revolution in
agriculture was taking place. In this revolution many technology transfer initiatives were created
which led to a drastic increase of production worldwide as well as innovative ideas that created
large supplies of food very quickly. Incorporating technological ideas such as mechanization,
which led to the massive increase of production of food at the expense of creating larger but fewer
farms, is what really gave headway to the mass production of food. With the creation of so much
food there needed to be advancements in the way we grew our food such as synthetic fertilizers,
pesticides, and GMOs. With these technological changes in the way food was farmed and
produced many people were able to benefit from the outcomes of the Green Revolution. The food
was able to be made and sold so cheaply that the revolution, to some degree, helped alleviate world
hunger by providing people with food that diversified their diet. However, with these changes in
agriculture came changes in the socio economy. Many small farms went into debt and lost their
land while the wealthier farms were able to grow the amount of land they had, thereby giving rise
to new ways of farming, like monoculture farming. Overall, the Green Revolution changed the
world in both positive and negative ways. By using new and old technologies to create a system
where food could be made cheaply and at large quantities, we see many

Ap World History Green Revolution
The Green Revolution had a positive, negative, or possibly both consequences on the way human
beings have evolutionized through out the years. Each of these documents specifically proves that
whether good or bad the different societies have been able to incorporate a little from what the
Green Revolution has left them into their daily lives. The Green Revolution on one–side has ignited
the revolution for new ideas and traditions. On the other side the Green Revolution has become a
form of destructing the true and only roots for most farmers. Documents 2, 3, 5, and 6 all show that
the Green Revolution caused a form of prosperity. Document 2 proves that as the Green Revolution
increased the population as well as food supply from 1950 to...show more content...
Document 10 proves that other civilizations such as the Mayans and the indigenous people were
negatively affected by the Green Revolution; as a cause of the Green Revolution the consequence
was that their seeds got contaminated meaning that a little big part from where they were from
were lost and so as firm they stood they were not able to defend them. The Guatemalan National
Committee of Indigenous people point of view expressed in this document is of interest because
it is a voice of very frustration and doubt and so would like the way the lower social classes are
treated to improve. Document 7 and 9 are both examples of the perspectives in which the Green
Revolution made both a positive effect and a negative effect. In the positive perspective of
Document 7 the Green Revolution as a cause was a major impact on the technology and so as a
consequence it brought multiple social benefits. The negative perspective of the Document 7 is
that women were forced to work and so also take on responsibilities that men usually do. The
source of this document posse a unique point of view because it shows the way women's role has
increased little by little. The positive perspective of Document 9 is that the Green Revolution caused
aspirations and as a consequence changed the way life was lived. The negative perspective of
Document 9 is that the green Revolution caused peasants to

Patagonia: Leading a Green Revolution Essay
Case Study Four
Patagonia: Leading a Green Revolution
1) Patagonia has a history of putting sustainability ahead of profits. Based on what you learned about
Patagonia's ideals, how do you think the company determines what possible ventures will be both
business practical and environmentally friendly?
Patagonia determines how its possible ventures will be both business practical and environmentally
friendly by turning their company into a eco friendly environment. It clearly states this in their
mission statement. " Build the best product, cause no unnecessary harm, use business to inspire and
implement solutions to the environmental crisis" Their main focus is going "green" to help the
environment but also using business as a...show more content...
He has had the company set an online library in which documents are posted. An example being "
the footprint chronicles," a guideline in which employees are shown how to make rational decisions.
Even after Yvon is gone employees should continue to do this so that when someone new is hired
they understand exactly what the company is about and how to handle different situations they may
encounter in this business. Yvon is also very big on giving back to the environment. The company
will donate 10 percent of pre– tax profits to environmental causes. This is something the company
should keep doing down the road to keep their mission statement alive about being environmentally
friendly. By adapting to Yvon Chouinard's ideals, they will become a permanent part of Patagiona.
3) Identify the stakeholders using figure 4.10.
The four main Stakeholder that stood out to me for Patagonia is employees, customers,
communities and owners. Patagonia focus on giving back to its employees by allowing them to
leave work in order to do what they love, helping the environment. The company allows its
employees to leave work to volunteer for causes they believe in and these employees will still
receive full pay. The company believes that customers deserve the best quality that they can get. No
matter how expensive the material may be, Patagonia always comes through by

The Green Revolution had many causes and consequences from 1945 to the present. One cause of
the Green Revolution would be the growth of mechanization and population. Another cause would
be poor land conditions and the high rate of famine. Consequences of the Green Revolution would be
competition, reduced genetic diversity, water shortages, and changes in lifestyle. The growth of
industrialization and of the population were one cause of the Green Revolution. According to the
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2005, wheat yields in Mexico increased
about 3,500 yields per hectare of wheat, and about 2,400 yields in India, from the year 1950 to
2010. During these years, mechanization continued and made it easier to...show more content...
They competed especially with Punjab, and left it filled with discontent and violence. Around 1879,
a newsletter published that the Green Revolution created limited women's wage–earning
opportunities through mechanization, thus causing competition for women. (Doc. 5, Doc. 7, Doc.8)
Dr. Vandana Shiva stated that the Green Revolution had lead to reduced genetic diversity. The
Guatemalan National Coordinating Committee of Indigenous Peasants said that the diversity of the
native seeds was the heritage of the indigenous people at the service of all humanity, but the
revolution sterilized and contaminated the seeds. They were upset to see the loss of their seeds.
(Doc. 8, Doc. 10) Dr. Vandana Shiva also stated that the Green Revolution also caused water
shortages. There was times of severe drought and the revolution only caused conflicts over
diminishing water sources. Intensive irrigation led to large–scale storage systems, centralizing
control over water supplies and leading to local and interstate water conflicts. (Doc. 10) One of the
social consequences of the Green Revolution was changes in lifestyle. The Human Development
Report, issued by the government of the State of Punjab, India in 2004, states that one important
social consequence of the Green Revolution was the disappearance of caste rigidities and the
emergence of the middle and rich peasants as the dominant peasantry in the state. The traditional
"extended family" was gradually replaced with

Causes Of The Green Revolution
In the twentieth century improvements in crop yield and quality were achieved through the
breeding of plants which produced modern and efficient agriculture strategies. Yields have increased
throughout the last century and continues to increase each and every year. The Green Revolution
sounds like a great idea because it can solve world food problems. Wheat has been the main crop
behind the Green Revolution. Crops are threatened by thousands of diseases that make global food
supply vulnerable. Some of which are infectious and non–infectious and caused by factors like
mineral deficiency or pollutants. Another problem to come with the Green Revolution is that
growing plants is not necessarily "green". They require a lot of energy to make the product which
causes environmental damage. When you increase food supply in growing nations it can lead to
human overpopulation. When this occurs more people get hungry and when there is not enough
food supply people can starve. Question 2: Monoculture is growing the same crop year after year
in a large region. Monoculture became popular in the United States because of mechanization,
improvement of crop varieties, and chemicals used to fertilize crops. With a sophisticated
machinery a farmer could farm more land and create bigger farms. This not only allowed farmers to
save money but advanced machinery allowed them to grow a single crop more efficiently and hasty.
A huge risk with monoculture is that because they are all genetically

Pros And Cons Of The Green Revolution
Green Garage Blog
Pros and Cons
Cars В»
Living В»
Boats В»
Homes В»
Environment В»
Home Environment 14 Foremost Pros and Cons of the Green Revolution
14 Foremost Pros and Cons of the Green Revolution
Environment
Most farmers, these days, practice modern farming methods under Green Revolution, which is a
movement pushed by the government as an alternative solution to traditional agriculture. Its main
goal is to make planting and harvesting more effective and efficient, as well as to eliminate hunger
all over the world. It originated from manufacturers in the US when they discovered that it is
possible to create a fertilizer from petroleum that can be used on crops–the so–called petrochemical
fertilizer.
Under Green Revolution, machinery processes are being used in farming. This modern method is
seen as labor intensive, where farmers make use of tractors, instead of oxen and horses, to plow and
cultivate their lands, making the process faster and easier. It is a combination of controlling
chemicals in the soil, weeds and pests, mechanization of agriculture, and genetic adaptation of plants
to suit daily needs.
However, this method has become a subject of some debates on whether it really does good, rather
than bad, for all of us. So, let us take a look at some of the pros and cons of Green Revolution to
have a clear overview of the matter.
List of Pros of Green Revolution
1. Agricultural Operations of a Massive Scale.
Green Revolution has brought agriculture to a massive

Pros And Cons Of The Green Revolution
The Green Revolution was caused by a rapid increase in the world population that the agriculture
industry was not able to support, causing an escalating problem with the world's food supply. This
problem could be solved by the methods of the Green Revolution, which would utilize new
technology in order to improve farming. However, although these procedures helped correct the
food production, they also had many negative benefits for the people farming the land and the land
itself. For the latter half of the twentieth century, the US and USSR competed to push the influence
towards as many countries as possible globally. This rivalry created high tensions in many areas of
the world as the two powers tried to take control. Either country would even try to buy their way into
winning a country over through providing them with gifts of money or arms. In relation to the Green
Revolution, these gifts could be the technology to improve their agriculture or raw foods themselves.
By providing weaker countries with these favors, the US or USSR would expect something in
return, which would be the allegiance of these countries. Conversely however, the fear of exhausting
the limited amount of food was an emotion that united citizens around the globe. This fear would
motivate them to overlook their differences and disputes in order to try and create a plan that would
benefit the greatest number of people through improving agricultural processes. By working
together, the global issue of an

Green Revolution Essay

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to Green Revolution Essay

Similar to Green Revolution Essay (9)

More from Paper Writing Service Reviews

More from Paper Writing Service Reviews (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Green Revolution Essay