WSN Security Research Directions

1,257 views

Published on

Published in: Technology, News & Politics
0 Comments
1 Like
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total views
1,257
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
422
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
1
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

WSN Security Research Directions

  1. 1. Security in Infrastructure Wireless Sensor Networks Emil  Lupu   Imperial  College  London  
  2. 2. Security  in  WSN  is  difficult  because…   •  Nodes  are  physically   accessible   •  Scale  is  unprecedended   •  Resources  are  limited   •  Opera?on  is  una@ended  
  3. 3. There  is  a  large  disconnect  between   research  and  applica?on   •  A  large  body  of  work  on  security  in  sensor   networks.     –  …  a  cursory  search  on  Google  scholar  gives  34,400   hits  since  2009   •  Yet  security  remains  largely  ignored  in   reported  deployments    
  4. 4. Research  is  oPen  based  on     assump?ons  such  as  …     •  Random  choice  of  a@ack  targets     •  Nodes  are  placed…:  in  a  grid,  uniformly  and   densely,  in  a  tree  with  a  single  sink,  in  pre-­‐ decided  groups.     •  Sensors  can  do…:  RSA  crypto,  puzzles,  Java,   homomorphic  crypto,  game  theory….  as  well   as  their  tasks.     •  All  nodes  are  coopera?ve  and  trustworthy,   faults  always  occur  randomly.    
  5. 5. Three  Guiding  Principles   •  Link  studies  to  context  of  use   •  Leverage  rela?onship  with  physical   phenomena.     •  Security  as  part  of  resilient  design  
  6. 6. Link  studies  to  context  of  use   •  •  •  •  •  •  Threat  Model   Physical  Security   Sensed  informa?on   Topology   Node  capabili?es   Security  objec?ves  
  7. 7. Leverage  rela?onship  to  physical   phenomena   •  Key  genera?on  and   distribu?on.   •  Distance  bounding.   •  Observability  of   associa?on.   •  A@esta?on.   •  Verifica?on  of  correct   behaviour  
  8. 8. Security  as  part  of  resilient  design   •  Is  it  a  fault  or  a   compromise?   •  Redundancy  drives   anomaly  detec?on,   trust,  recovery   •  Adapta?on  vs  security   •  Resource  limita?ons  
  9. 9. Research  Themes   •  Designing  solu?ons  in  concrete  se^ngs.     •  Establishing  confidence  in  the  correct  and   secure  opera?on  of  devices.     •  Measuring  the  “health”  of  the  network  from   within  itself.     •  Data  quality  and  trustworthiness  assurance.    
  10. 10. Designing  solu?ons  in  concrete   se^ngs   •  Key  management  for  the   context  of  use   •  Evaluate  and  improve   exis?ng  algorithms  e.g.,   applicability,  scaleability   •  Mi?ga?on  and  recovery   through  reconfigura?on  
  11. 11. Establishing  confidence  in  the  correct   and  secure  opera?on  of  devices       •  Measuring  device  integrity.   •  A@esta?on  techniques   –  SoPware,  hardware,  physical   •  Behavioural  fingerprin?ng  and   valida?on.   •  Reputa?on.  
  12. 12. Measuring  the  health  of  the  network   from  within  itself   •  For  a  sensor,  a  network,  a  city.     •  Assurances  and  Mechanisms   •  Capability  of  restart/recovery/ response/degraded  opera?on   •  Coordina?on/Topology/ Redundancy   •  Effect  of  adapta?on  on   security  and  resilience  
  13. 13. •  Learning  to  dis?nguish   between  normal  behaviour,   failures  and  security.   •  Recognising  security  events   in  constantly  evolving   networks.   •  A@ack  characterisa?on   •  Compromise  epidemiology  
  14. 14. Data  Quality  and  Trustworthiness   Assurance   •  Data  protec?on  and  provenance   •  In-­‐network  Data  Aggrega?on   •  How  to  accept  data  degrada?on  to  maintain   overall  system  goals.     •  Understand  and  mi?gate  against  data   deteriora?on  effects  e.g.  node  compromise   failures,  fouling   •  Data  usage  control  
  15. 15. Polygonia  Interroga?onis  

×