SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 19
PSYC 3100: LAB-BASED STATISTICS 
7. PRESENTATION 
You are running with a temporary license 
GET 
FILE='D:2014.2015lab Based Statisticdone lab based questionnaireslab base spssLab 
Questionnaires.sav'. 
DATASET NAME DataSet0 WINDOW=FRONT. 
RECODE ItemB2 ItemB3 ItemB5 ItemB6 (1=4) (2=3) (3=2) (4=1). 
EXECUTE. 
COMPUTE Agreeableness=14 - ItemA1 + ItemA2 - ItemA3 + ItemA4 - ItemA5 + ItemA6 - ItemA7 + ItemA8 + 
ItemA9 + ItemA10. 
EXECUTE. 
COMPUTE ATW=ItemB1 + ItemB2 + ItemB3 + ItemB4 + ItemB5 + ItemB6 + ItemB7 + ItemB8 + ItemB9 + 
ItemB10. 
EXECUTE. 
RECODE Agreeableness (1 thru 13=1) (14 thru 26=2) (27 thru Highest=3) INTO AgreeablenessLevel. 
EXECUTE. 
RECODE ATW (1 thru 13=1) (14 thru 26=2) (Lowest thru 27=3) INTO ATWLevel. 
EXECUTE. 
FREQUENCIES VARIABLES=Agreeableness /STATISTICS=MINIMUM MAXIMUM SKEWNESS SESKEW KURTOSIS 
SEKURT/ORDER=ANALYSIS. 
FREQUENCIES VARIABLES=Agreeableness ATW ID Age Month Year Gender ItemA1 ItemA2 ItemA3 ItemA4 It 
emA5 ItemA6 ItemA7 ItemA8 ItemA9 ItemA10 ItemB1 ItemB2 ItemB3 ItemB4 ItemB5 ItemB6 ItemB7 ItemB8 It 
emB9 ItemB10 AgreeablenessLevel ATWLevel 
/STATISTICS=MINIMUM MAXIMUM 
/ORDER=ANALYSIS. 
Frequencies 
[DataSet1] D:2014.2015lab Based Statisticdone lab based questionnaireslab base spssLab Questionn 
aires.sav
PSYC 3100: LAB-BASED STATISTICS 
Statistics 
N Minimum Maximum 
Valid Missing 
Agreeableness 31 1 19 36 
Attitude Towards Woman 30 2 17 32 
Id of respondent 32 0 1 32 
Age of respondent 32 0 19 25 
Respondent's month of birthday 32 0 1 19 
Respondent's year of birthday 32 0 1989 2014 
Gender of respondent 32 0 1 2 
I feel little concern for others. 32 0 2 5 
I am interested in people. 32 0 2 5 
I do insult people. 31 1 1 4 
I sympathize with other' feeling. 32 0 3 5 
I am not interested in other people's problems. 32 0 1 5 
I have a soft heart. 32 0 2 5 
I am not really interested in others. 32 0 1 4 
I spend some of my time for others. 32 0 2 5 
I feel others' emotions. 32 0 2 5 
I make people feel at ease. 32 0 3 5 
Swearing and obscenity are more repulsive in the speech of a woman than 
of a man. 
31 1 1 4 
Under modern economic conditions with women being active outside the 
home, men should share in household task such as washing dishes and 
doing the laundry. 
32 0 1 4 
There should be a strict merit system in job appointment and promotion 
without regard to sex. 
32 0 1 4 
Women should worry less about their rights and more about becoming 
good wives and mothers. 
32 0 1 4 
Women earning as much as their dates should bear equally the expense 
when they go out together. 
32 0 1 4 
Women should assume their rightful place in business and all the 
professions along with men. 
32 0 1 4 
A woman should not expect to go to exactly the same places or to have 
quite the same freedom of action as a man. 
31 1 1 4
PSYC 3100: LAB-BASED STATISTICS 
In general, the father should have greater authority than the mother in the 
bringing up of children. 
32 0 1 4 
Women should be concerned with their duties of childbearing and house 
tending rather than with desires for professional or business careers. 
32 0 1 4 
The intellectual leadership of a community should be largely in the hands 
of men. 
32 0 1 4 
Agreeableness Level 31 1 2 3 
Attitudes towards Woman Level 30 2 2 3 
FREQUENCIES VARIABLES=ID Age Month Year Gender Agreeableness ATW 
/STATISTICS=MINIMUM MAXIMUM 
/ORDER=ANALYSIS. 
Frequencies 
[DataSet1] D:2014.2015lab Based Statisticdone lab based questionnaireslab base spssLab Questionn 
aires.sav 
Id of 
respondent 
Frequency Table 
Age of 
respondent 
Respondent's 
month of 
birthday 
Id of respondent 
Statistics 
Respondent's 
year of 
birthday 
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent 
Valid 1 1 3.1 3.1 3.1 
2 1 3.1 3.1 6.2 
3 1 3.1 3.1 9.4 
4 1 3.1 3.1 12.5 
5 1 3.1 3.1 15.6 
6 1 3.1 3.1 18.8 
Gender of 
respondent 
Agreeableness 
Attitude 
Towards 
Woman 
N Valid 32 32 32 32 32 31 30 
Missing 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 
Minimum 1 19 1 1989 1 19 17 
Maximum 32 25 19 2014 2 36 32
PSYC 3100: LAB-BASED STATISTICS 
7 1 3.1 3.1 21.9 
8 1 3.1 3.1 25.0 
9 1 3.1 3.1 28.1 
10 1 3.1 3.1 31.2 
11 1 3.1 3.1 34.4 
12 1 3.1 3.1 37.5 
13 1 3.1 3.1 40.6 
14 1 3.1 3.1 43.8 
15 1 3.1 3.1 46.9 
16 1 3.1 3.1 50.0 
17 1 3.1 3.1 53.1 
18 1 3.1 3.1 56.2 
19 1 3.1 3.1 59.4 
20 1 3.1 3.1 62.5 
21 1 3.1 3.1 65.6 
22 1 3.1 3.1 68.8 
23 1 3.1 3.1 71.9 
24 1 3.1 3.1 75.0 
25 1 3.1 3.1 78.1 
26 1 3.1 3.1 81.2 
27 1 3.1 3.1 84.4 
28 1 3.1 3.1 87.5 
29 1 3.1 3.1 90.6 
30 1 3.1 3.1 93.8 
31 1 3.1 3.1 96.9 
32 1 3.1 3.1 100.0 
Total 32 100.0 100.0
PSYC 3100: LAB-BASED STATISTICS 
Age of respondent 
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent 
Valid 19 1 3.1 3.1 3.1 
20 1 3.1 3.1 6.2 
21 7 21.9 21.9 28.1 
22 5 15.6 15.6 43.8 
23 14 43.8 43.8 87.5 
24 2 6.2 6.2 93.8 
25 2 6.2 6.2 100.0 
Total 32 100.0 100.0 
Respondent's month of birthday 
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent 
Valid January 2 6.2 6.2 6.2 
February 1 3.1 3.1 9.4 
March 3 9.4 9.4 18.8 
April 6 18.8 18.8 37.5 
May 3 9.4 9.4 46.9 
July 2 6.2 6.2 53.1 
August 8 25.0 25.0 78.1 
September 2 6.2 6.2 84.4 
October 1 3.1 3.1 87.5 
November 1 3.1 3.1 90.6 
December 2 6.2 6.2 96.9 
19 1 3.1 3.1 100.0 
Total 32 100.0 100.0
PSYC 3100: LAB-BASED STATISTICS 
Respondent's year of birthday 
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent 
Valid 1989 2 6.2 6.2 6.2 
1990 2 6.2 6.2 12.5 
1991 14 43.8 43.8 56.2 
1992 5 15.6 15.6 71.9 
1993 6 18.8 18.8 90.6 
1994 1 3.1 3.1 93.8 
1995 1 3.1 3.1 96.9 
2014 1 3.1 3.1 100.0 
Total 32 100.0 100.0 
Gender of respondent 
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent 
Valid Male 16 50.0 50.0 50.0 
Female 16 50.0 50.0 100.0 
Total 32 100.0 100.0 
Agreeableness 
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent 
Valid 19 1 3.1 3.2 3.2 
22 3 9.4 9.7 12.9 
23 2 6.2 6.5 19.4 
24 3 9.4 9.7 29.0 
25 3 9.4 9.7 38.7 
26 4 12.5 12.9 51.6 
27 4 12.5 12.9 64.5 
28 3 9.4 9.7 74.2 
29 1 3.1 3.2 77.4 
30 1 3.1 3.2 80.6 
31 2 6.2 6.5 87.1 
32 1 3.1 3.2 90.3 
33 1 3.1 3.2 93.5 
34 1 3.1 3.2 96.8
PSYC 3100: LAB-BASED STATISTICS 
36 1 3.1 3.2 100.0 
Total 31 96.9 100.0 
Missing 99 1 3.1 
Total 32 100.0 
Attitude Towards Woman 
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent 
Valid 17 1 3.1 3.3 3.3 
18 2 6.2 6.7 10.0 
19 2 6.2 6.7 16.7 
20 1 3.1 3.3 20.0 
21 1 3.1 3.3 23.3 
22 3 9.4 10.0 33.3 
23 3 9.4 10.0 43.3 
24 5 15.6 16.7 60.0 
25 2 6.2 6.7 66.7 
26 2 6.2 6.7 73.3 
27 2 6.2 6.7 80.0 
28 1 3.1 3.3 83.3 
29 2 6.2 6.7 90.0 
30 1 3.1 3.3 93.3 
31 1 3.1 3.3 96.7 
32 1 3.1 3.3 100.0 
Total 30 93.8 100.0 
Missing 99 2 6.2 
Total 32 100.0 
FREQUENCIES VARIABLES=ID Age Month Year Gender Agreeableness ATW 
/STATISTICS=MINIMUM MAXIMUM 
/ORDER=ANALYSIS. 
Frequencies 
[DataSet1] D:2014.2015lab Based Statisticdone lab based questionnaireslab base spssLab Questionn 
aires.sav
PSYC 3100: LAB-BASED STATISTICS 
Statistics 
Id of 
respondent 
Age of 
respondent 
Respondent's 
month of 
birthday 
Respondent's 
year of 
birthday 
Gender of 
respondent 
Agreeableness 
Attitude 
Towards 
Woman 
N Valid 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 
Missing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 
Minimum 1 9 1 1989 1 19 17 
Maximum 32 25 12 1995 2 36 32 
Frequency Table 
Id of respondent 
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent 
Valid 1 1 3.1 3.1 3.1 
2 1 3.1 3.1 6.2 
3 1 3.1 3.1 9.4 
4 1 3.1 3.1 12.5 
5 1 3.1 3.1 15.6 
6 1 3.1 3.1 18.8 
7 1 3.1 3.1 21.9 
8 1 3.1 3.1 25.0 
9 1 3.1 3.1 28.1 
10 1 3.1 3.1 31.2 
11 1 3.1 3.1 34.4 
12 1 3.1 3.1 37.5 
13 1 3.1 3.1 40.6 
14 1 3.1 3.1 43.8 
15 1 3.1 3.1 46.9 
16 1 3.1 3.1 50.0 
17 1 3.1 3.1 53.1 
18 1 3.1 3.1 56.2 
19 1 3.1 3.1 59.4 
20 1 3.1 3.1 62.5 
21 1 3.1 3.1 65.6
PSYC 3100: LAB-BASED STATISTICS 
22 1 3.1 3.1 68.8 
23 1 3.1 3.1 71.9 
24 1 3.1 3.1 75.0 
25 1 3.1 3.1 78.1 
26 1 3.1 3.1 81.2 
27 1 3.1 3.1 84.4 
28 1 3.1 3.1 87.5 
29 1 3.1 3.1 90.6 
30 1 3.1 3.1 93.8 
31 1 3.1 3.1 96.9 
32 1 3.1 3.1 100.0 
Total 32 100.0 100.0 
Age of respondent 
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent 
Valid 9 1 3.1 3.1 3.1 
20 1 3.1 3.1 6.2 
21 7 21.9 21.9 28.1 
22 5 15.6 15.6 43.8 
23 14 43.8 43.8 87.5 
24 2 6.2 6.2 93.8 
25 2 6.2 6.2 100.0 
Total 32 100.0 100.0 
Respondent's month of birthday 
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent 
Valid January 2 6.2 6.2 6.2 
February 1 3.1 3.1 9.4 
March 3 9.4 9.4 18.8 
April 6 18.8 18.8 37.5 
May 3 9.4 9.4 46.9 
July 2 6.2 6.2 53.1 
August 8 25.0 25.0 78.1 
September 3 9.4 9.4 87.5
PSYC 3100: LAB-BASED STATISTICS 
October 1 3.1 3.1 90.6 
November 1 3.1 3.1 93.8 
December 2 6.2 6.2 100.0 
Total 32 100.0 100.0 
Respondent's year of birthday 
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent 
Valid 1989 2 6.2 6.2 6.2 
1990 2 6.2 6.2 12.5 
1991 14 43.8 43.8 56.2 
1992 5 15.6 15.6 71.9 
1993 7 21.9 21.9 93.8 
1994 1 3.1 3.1 96.9 
1995 1 3.1 3.1 100.0 
Total 32 100.0 100.0 
Gender of respondent 
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent 
Valid Male 16 50.0 50.0 50.0 
Female 16 50.0 50.0 100.0 
Total 32 100.0 100.0 
Agreeableness 
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent 
Valid 19 1 3.1 3.1 3.1 
22 3 9.4 9.4 12.5 
23 2 6.2 6.2 18.8 
24 3 9.4 9.4 28.1 
25 3 9.4 9.4 37.5 
26 4 12.5 12.5 50.0 
27 5 15.6 15.6 65.6 
28 3 9.4 9.4 75.0 
29 1 3.1 3.1 78.1 
30 1 3.1 3.1 81.2
PSYC 3100: LAB-BASED STATISTICS 
31 2 6.2 6.2 87.5 
32 1 3.1 3.1 90.6 
33 1 3.1 3.1 93.8 
34 1 3.1 3.1 96.9 
36 1 3.1 3.1 100.0 
Total 32 100.0 100.0 
Attitude Towards Woman 
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent 
Valid 17 1 3.1 3.1 3.1 
18 2 6.2 6.2 9.4 
19 2 6.2 6.2 15.6 
20 1 3.1 3.1 18.8 
21 1 3.1 3.1 21.9 
22 3 9.4 9.4 31.2 
23 4 12.5 12.5 43.8 
24 6 18.8 18.8 62.5 
25 2 6.2 6.2 68.8 
26 2 6.2 6.2 75.0 
27 2 6.2 6.2 81.2 
28 1 3.1 3.1 84.4 
29 2 6.2 6.2 90.6 
30 1 3.1 3.1 93.8 
31 1 3.1 3.1 96.9 
32 1 3.1 3.1 100.0 
Total 32 100.0 100.0 
GRAPH 
/HISTOGRAM(NORMAL)=Agreeableness. 
Graph 
[DataSet1] D:2014.2015lab Based Statisticdone lab based questionnaireslab base spssLab Questionn 
aires.sav
PSYC 3100: LAB-BASED STATISTICS 
GRAPH 
/HISTOGRAM(NORMAL)=ATW. 
Graph 
[DataSet1] D:2014.2015lab Based Statisticdone lab based questionnaireslab base spssLab Questionn 
aires.sav
PSYC 3100: LAB-BASED STATISTICS 
PPLOT 
/VARIABLES=Agreeableness ATW 
/NOLOG 
/NOSTANDARDIZE 
/TYPE=P-P 
/FRACTION=BLOM 
/TIES=MEAN 
/DIST=NORMAL. 
PPlot 
[DataSet1] D:2014.2015lab Based Statisticdone lab based questionnaireslab base spssLab Questionn 
aires.sav 
Model Description 
Model Name MOD_1 
Series or Sequence 1 Agreeableness 
2 Attitude Towards Woman 
Transformation None 
Non-Seasonal Differencing 0 
Seasonal Differencing 0 
Length of Seasonal Period No periodicity 
Standardization Not applied 
Distribution Type Normal 
Location estimated 
Scale estimated 
Fractional Rank Estimation Method Blom's 
Rank Assigned to Ties Mean rank of tied values 
Applying the model specifications from MOD_1 
Case Processing Summary 
Agreeableness 
Attitude Towards 
Woman 
Series or Sequence Length 32 32 
Number of Missing Values in 
the Plot 
User-Missing 0 0 
System-Missing 0 0 
The cases are unweighted.
PSYC 3100: LAB-BASED STATISTICS 
Estimated Distribution Parameters 
Agreeableness 
Attitude Towards 
Woman 
Normal Distribution Location 26.78 24.03 
Scale 3.816 3.831 
The cases are unweighted. 
Agreeableness
PSYC 3100: LAB-BASED STATISTICS 
Attitude Towards Woman
PSYC 3100: LAB-BASED STATISTICS 
PPLOT 
/VARIABLES=Agreeableness ATW 
/NOLOG 
/NOSTANDARDIZE 
/TYPE=Q-Q 
/FRACTION=BLOM 
/TIES=MEAN 
/DIST=NORMAL. 
PPlot 
[DataSet1] D:2014.2015lab Based Statisticdone lab based questionnaireslab base spssLab Questionn 
aires.sav 
Model Description 
Model Name MOD_2 
Series or Sequence 1 Agreeableness 
2 Attitude Towards Woman 
Transformation None 
Non-Seasonal Differencing 0 
Seasonal Differencing 0 
Length of Seasonal Period No periodicity 
Standardization Not applied 
Distribution Type Normal 
Location estimated 
Scale estimated 
Fractional Rank Estimation Method Blom's 
Rank Assigned to Ties Mean rank of tied values 
Applying the model specifications from MOD_2 
Case Processing Summary 
Agreeableness 
Attitude Towards 
Woman 
Series or Sequence Length 32 32 
Number of Missing Values in 
the Plot 
User-Missing 0 0 
System-Missing 0 0 
The cases are unweighted.
PSYC 3100: LAB-BASED STATISTICS 
Estimated Distribution Parameters 
Agreeableness 
Attitude Towards 
Woman 
Normal Distribution Location 26.78 24.03 
Scale 3.816 3.831 
The cases are unweighted. 
Agreeableness
PSYC 3100: LAB-BASED STATISTICS 
Attitude Towards Woman 
DESCRIPTIVES VARIABLES=Agreeableness ATW 
/STATISTICS=MEAN STDDEV MIN MAX KURTOSIS SKEWNESS.
PSYC 3100: LAB-BASED STATISTICS 
Descriptives 
[DataSet1] D:2014.2015lab Based Statisticdone lab based questionnaireslab base spssLab Questionn 
aires.sav 
Descriptive Statistics 
N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation Skewness Kurtosis 
Statistic Statistic Statistic Statistic Statistic Statistic Std. Error Statistic Std. Error 
Agreeableness 32 19 36 26.78 3.816 .465 .414 .157 .809 
Attitude Towards Woman 32 17 32 24.03 3.831 .165 .414 -.389 .809 
Valid N (listwise) 32

More Related Content

Viewers also liked

Performance Evaluation { By SHINU }
Performance Evaluation  { By SHINU }Performance Evaluation  { By SHINU }
Performance Evaluation { By SHINU }Shinu Mathew
 
Aging Innovation Week (Taiwan) 銀浪新創力國際論壇-- 美國燈塔山村 By Laura Connors (英文版)
Aging Innovation Week (Taiwan)  銀浪新創力國際論壇-- 美國燈塔山村 By Laura Connors (英文版)Aging Innovation Week (Taiwan)  銀浪新創力國際論壇-- 美國燈塔山村 By Laura Connors (英文版)
Aging Innovation Week (Taiwan) 銀浪新創力國際論壇-- 美國燈塔山村 By Laura Connors (英文版)Silver Linings Global 銀享全球
 
Aging Innovation Week (Taiwan) 銀浪新創力國際論壇 -- 香港長者安居協會 by Timothy Ma (馬錦華)
Aging Innovation Week (Taiwan) 銀浪新創力國際論壇 -- 香港長者安居協會 by Timothy Ma (馬錦華)Aging Innovation Week (Taiwan) 銀浪新創力國際論壇 -- 香港長者安居協會 by Timothy Ma (馬錦華)
Aging Innovation Week (Taiwan) 銀浪新創力國際論壇 -- 香港長者安居協會 by Timothy Ma (馬錦華)Silver Linings Global 銀享全球
 
Aging Innovation Week (Taiwan) 銀浪新創力國際論壇--丹麥人才培育 by Liisa Bassett(中文版)
Aging Innovation Week (Taiwan) 銀浪新創力國際論壇--丹麥人才培育 by Liisa Bassett(中文版)Aging Innovation Week (Taiwan) 銀浪新創力國際論壇--丹麥人才培育 by Liisa Bassett(中文版)
Aging Innovation Week (Taiwan) 銀浪新創力國際論壇--丹麥人才培育 by Liisa Bassett(中文版)Silver Linings Global 銀享全球
 
Aging Innovation Week (Taiwan) 銀浪新創力國際國際論壇--開場專題演講 by Joyce Yen Feng 馮燕
Aging Innovation Week (Taiwan) 銀浪新創力國際國際論壇--開場專題演講 by Joyce Yen Feng 馮燕Aging Innovation Week (Taiwan) 銀浪新創力國際國際論壇--開場專題演講 by Joyce Yen Feng 馮燕
Aging Innovation Week (Taiwan) 銀浪新創力國際國際論壇--開場專題演講 by Joyce Yen Feng 馮燕Silver Linings Global 銀享全球
 
Aging Innovation Week (Taiwan) 銀浪新創力國際論壇-美國燈塔山村 by Laura Connors(中文版)
Aging Innovation Week (Taiwan)  銀浪新創力國際論壇-美國燈塔山村 by Laura Connors(中文版)Aging Innovation Week (Taiwan)  銀浪新創力國際論壇-美國燈塔山村 by Laura Connors(中文版)
Aging Innovation Week (Taiwan) 銀浪新創力國際論壇-美國燈塔山村 by Laura Connors(中文版)Silver Linings Global 銀享全球
 
Performance Evaluation By MBA. Shinu
Performance Evaluation  By MBA. ShinuPerformance Evaluation  By MBA. Shinu
Performance Evaluation By MBA. ShinuShinu Mathew
 
Aging Innovation Week (Taiwan) 銀浪新創力國際論壇--日本茶話本鋪 by 藤田英明 (丸長郎室長代)
Aging Innovation Week (Taiwan) 銀浪新創力國際論壇--日本茶話本鋪  by 藤田英明 (丸長郎室長代)Aging Innovation Week (Taiwan) 銀浪新創力國際論壇--日本茶話本鋪  by 藤田英明 (丸長郎室長代)
Aging Innovation Week (Taiwan) 銀浪新創力國際論壇--日本茶話本鋪 by 藤田英明 (丸長郎室長代)Silver Linings Global 銀享全球
 

Viewers also liked (9)

Performance Evaluation { By SHINU }
Performance Evaluation  { By SHINU }Performance Evaluation  { By SHINU }
Performance Evaluation { By SHINU }
 
Aging Innovation Week (Taiwan) 銀浪新創力國際論壇-- 美國燈塔山村 By Laura Connors (英文版)
Aging Innovation Week (Taiwan)  銀浪新創力國際論壇-- 美國燈塔山村 By Laura Connors (英文版)Aging Innovation Week (Taiwan)  銀浪新創力國際論壇-- 美國燈塔山村 By Laura Connors (英文版)
Aging Innovation Week (Taiwan) 銀浪新創力國際論壇-- 美國燈塔山村 By Laura Connors (英文版)
 
Aging Innovation Week (Taiwan) 銀浪新創力國際論壇 -- 香港長者安居協會 by Timothy Ma (馬錦華)
Aging Innovation Week (Taiwan) 銀浪新創力國際論壇 -- 香港長者安居協會 by Timothy Ma (馬錦華)Aging Innovation Week (Taiwan) 銀浪新創力國際論壇 -- 香港長者安居協會 by Timothy Ma (馬錦華)
Aging Innovation Week (Taiwan) 銀浪新創力國際論壇 -- 香港長者安居協會 by Timothy Ma (馬錦華)
 
Aging Innovation Week (Taiwan) 銀浪新創力國際論壇--丹麥人才培育 by Liisa Bassett(中文版)
Aging Innovation Week (Taiwan) 銀浪新創力國際論壇--丹麥人才培育 by Liisa Bassett(中文版)Aging Innovation Week (Taiwan) 銀浪新創力國際論壇--丹麥人才培育 by Liisa Bassett(中文版)
Aging Innovation Week (Taiwan) 銀浪新創力國際論壇--丹麥人才培育 by Liisa Bassett(中文版)
 
Aging Innovation Week (Taiwan) 銀浪新創力國際國際論壇--開場專題演講 by Joyce Yen Feng 馮燕
Aging Innovation Week (Taiwan) 銀浪新創力國際國際論壇--開場專題演講 by Joyce Yen Feng 馮燕Aging Innovation Week (Taiwan) 銀浪新創力國際國際論壇--開場專題演講 by Joyce Yen Feng 馮燕
Aging Innovation Week (Taiwan) 銀浪新創力國際國際論壇--開場專題演講 by Joyce Yen Feng 馮燕
 
Aging Innovation Week (Taiwan) 銀浪新創力國際論壇-美國燈塔山村 by Laura Connors(中文版)
Aging Innovation Week (Taiwan)  銀浪新創力國際論壇-美國燈塔山村 by Laura Connors(中文版)Aging Innovation Week (Taiwan)  銀浪新創力國際論壇-美國燈塔山村 by Laura Connors(中文版)
Aging Innovation Week (Taiwan) 銀浪新創力國際論壇-美國燈塔山村 by Laura Connors(中文版)
 
Performance Evaluation By MBA. Shinu
Performance Evaluation  By MBA. ShinuPerformance Evaluation  By MBA. Shinu
Performance Evaluation By MBA. Shinu
 
銀享小聚 March 2015 (SLG Gathering 03312015)
銀享小聚 March 2015 (SLG Gathering 03312015)銀享小聚 March 2015 (SLG Gathering 03312015)
銀享小聚 March 2015 (SLG Gathering 03312015)
 
Aging Innovation Week (Taiwan) 銀浪新創力國際論壇--日本茶話本鋪 by 藤田英明 (丸長郎室長代)
Aging Innovation Week (Taiwan) 銀浪新創力國際論壇--日本茶話本鋪  by 藤田英明 (丸長郎室長代)Aging Innovation Week (Taiwan) 銀浪新創力國際論壇--日本茶話本鋪  by 藤田英明 (丸長郎室長代)
Aging Innovation Week (Taiwan) 銀浪新創力國際論壇--日本茶話本鋪 by 藤田英明 (丸長郎室長代)
 

Similar to e-Portfolio for Lab-Based Statistics (PSYC 3100) part 2 (7.presentation)

Math final
Math finalMath final
Math finalJy Chong
 
Math final project (fnbe0814)
Math final project (fnbe0814)Math final project (fnbe0814)
Math final project (fnbe0814)Jy Chong
 
AP Statistics - Confidence Intervals with Means - One Sample
AP Statistics - Confidence Intervals with Means - One SampleAP Statistics - Confidence Intervals with Means - One Sample
AP Statistics - Confidence Intervals with Means - One SampleFrances Coronel
 
ALLL Webinar | CECL Methodologies Series Kick Off
ALLL Webinar | CECL Methodologies Series Kick OffALLL Webinar | CECL Methodologies Series Kick Off
ALLL Webinar | CECL Methodologies Series Kick OffLibby Bierman
 
Renee Hutchings SPSS wk 81. Compute the mean, median mode, s.docx
Renee Hutchings SPSS wk 81. Compute the mean, median mode, s.docxRenee Hutchings SPSS wk 81. Compute the mean, median mode, s.docx
Renee Hutchings SPSS wk 81. Compute the mean, median mode, s.docxdebishakespeare
 
Properties of Normal Distribution
Properties of Normal DistributionProperties of Normal Distribution
Properties of Normal DistributionDr. Lokesh Gupta
 
S.M.A.R.T Final Presentation 2016
S.M.A.R.T Final Presentation 2016S.M.A.R.T Final Presentation 2016
S.M.A.R.T Final Presentation 2016Alana Alston
 
wealth age region37 50 M24 88 U14 64 A13 63 U13 66 .docx
wealth age region37 50 M24 88 U14 64 A13 63 U13 66 .docxwealth age region37 50 M24 88 U14 64 A13 63 U13 66 .docx
wealth age region37 50 M24 88 U14 64 A13 63 U13 66 .docxmelbruce90096
 
DFC Evaluation 2012-03-22
DFC Evaluation 2012-03-22DFC Evaluation 2012-03-22
DFC Evaluation 2012-03-22J Valdez
 
Metrics and Measurement Work Sampling Project
Metrics and Measurement Work Sampling ProjectMetrics and Measurement Work Sampling Project
Metrics and Measurement Work Sampling ProjectDivyang Choudhary
 
A study of graduate & post graduate students regarding their career plans
A study of graduate & post graduate students regarding their career plansA study of graduate & post graduate students regarding their career plans
A study of graduate & post graduate students regarding their career plansVaibhav Vaidya
 
Making Big Data relevant: Importance of Data Visualization and Analytics
Making Big Data relevant: Importance of Data Visualization and AnalyticsMaking Big Data relevant: Importance of Data Visualization and Analytics
Making Big Data relevant: Importance of Data Visualization and AnalyticsGramener
 
Sratistik data latihan analisis
Sratistik data latihan analisisSratistik data latihan analisis
Sratistik data latihan analisiskhanifsyafii
 
Cs in Naser Medical Complx- Gaza - Palestine
Cs in Naser Medical Complx- Gaza - PalestineCs in Naser Medical Complx- Gaza - Palestine
Cs in Naser Medical Complx- Gaza - PalestineWaled Abohatab
 

Similar to e-Portfolio for Lab-Based Statistics (PSYC 3100) part 2 (7.presentation) (20)

Math final
Math finalMath final
Math final
 
Math final project (fnbe0814)
Math final project (fnbe0814)Math final project (fnbe0814)
Math final project (fnbe0814)
 
AP Statistics - Confidence Intervals with Means - One Sample
AP Statistics - Confidence Intervals with Means - One SampleAP Statistics - Confidence Intervals with Means - One Sample
AP Statistics - Confidence Intervals with Means - One Sample
 
ALLL Webinar | CECL Methodologies Series Kick Off
ALLL Webinar | CECL Methodologies Series Kick OffALLL Webinar | CECL Methodologies Series Kick Off
ALLL Webinar | CECL Methodologies Series Kick Off
 
Business Research
Business ResearchBusiness Research
Business Research
 
Renee Hutchings SPSS wk 81. Compute the mean, median mode, s.docx
Renee Hutchings SPSS wk 81. Compute the mean, median mode, s.docxRenee Hutchings SPSS wk 81. Compute the mean, median mode, s.docx
Renee Hutchings SPSS wk 81. Compute the mean, median mode, s.docx
 
Phase 1 survey results, F.R.E.E. global survey (Oct 2017, experiencer.org)
Phase 1 survey results, F.R.E.E. global survey (Oct 2017, experiencer.org)Phase 1 survey results, F.R.E.E. global survey (Oct 2017, experiencer.org)
Phase 1 survey results, F.R.E.E. global survey (Oct 2017, experiencer.org)
 
Properties of Normal Distribution
Properties of Normal DistributionProperties of Normal Distribution
Properties of Normal Distribution
 
Frequency table
Frequency tableFrequency table
Frequency table
 
S.M.A.R.T Final Presentation 2016
S.M.A.R.T Final Presentation 2016S.M.A.R.T Final Presentation 2016
S.M.A.R.T Final Presentation 2016
 
wealth age region37 50 M24 88 U14 64 A13 63 U13 66 .docx
wealth age region37 50 M24 88 U14 64 A13 63 U13 66 .docxwealth age region37 50 M24 88 U14 64 A13 63 U13 66 .docx
wealth age region37 50 M24 88 U14 64 A13 63 U13 66 .docx
 
statistik
statistikstatistik
statistik
 
DFC Evaluation 2012-03-22
DFC Evaluation 2012-03-22DFC Evaluation 2012-03-22
DFC Evaluation 2012-03-22
 
Metrics and Measurement Work Sampling Project
Metrics and Measurement Work Sampling ProjectMetrics and Measurement Work Sampling Project
Metrics and Measurement Work Sampling Project
 
Descriptive statistics by abdul ghafoor sajjad
Descriptive statistics by abdul ghafoor sajjadDescriptive statistics by abdul ghafoor sajjad
Descriptive statistics by abdul ghafoor sajjad
 
A study of graduate & post graduate students regarding their career plans
A study of graduate & post graduate students regarding their career plansA study of graduate & post graduate students regarding their career plans
A study of graduate & post graduate students regarding their career plans
 
Frequencies kepira
Frequencies kepiraFrequencies kepira
Frequencies kepira
 
Making Big Data relevant: Importance of Data Visualization and Analytics
Making Big Data relevant: Importance of Data Visualization and AnalyticsMaking Big Data relevant: Importance of Data Visualization and Analytics
Making Big Data relevant: Importance of Data Visualization and Analytics
 
Sratistik data latihan analisis
Sratistik data latihan analisisSratistik data latihan analisis
Sratistik data latihan analisis
 
Cs in Naser Medical Complx- Gaza - Palestine
Cs in Naser Medical Complx- Gaza - PalestineCs in Naser Medical Complx- Gaza - Palestine
Cs in Naser Medical Complx- Gaza - Palestine
 

Recently uploaded

Hierarchy of management that covers different levels of management
Hierarchy of management that covers different levels of managementHierarchy of management that covers different levels of management
Hierarchy of management that covers different levels of managementmkooblal
 
Types of Journalistic Writing Grade 8.pptx
Types of Journalistic Writing Grade 8.pptxTypes of Journalistic Writing Grade 8.pptx
Types of Journalistic Writing Grade 8.pptxEyham Joco
 
Like-prefer-love -hate+verb+ing & silent letters & citizenship text.pdf
Like-prefer-love -hate+verb+ing & silent letters & citizenship text.pdfLike-prefer-love -hate+verb+ing & silent letters & citizenship text.pdf
Like-prefer-love -hate+verb+ing & silent letters & citizenship text.pdfMr Bounab Samir
 
POINT- BIOCHEMISTRY SEM 2 ENZYMES UNIT 5.pptx
POINT- BIOCHEMISTRY SEM 2 ENZYMES UNIT 5.pptxPOINT- BIOCHEMISTRY SEM 2 ENZYMES UNIT 5.pptx
POINT- BIOCHEMISTRY SEM 2 ENZYMES UNIT 5.pptxSayali Powar
 
Capitol Tech U Doctoral Presentation - April 2024.pptx
Capitol Tech U Doctoral Presentation - April 2024.pptxCapitol Tech U Doctoral Presentation - April 2024.pptx
Capitol Tech U Doctoral Presentation - April 2024.pptxCapitolTechU
 
Framing an Appropriate Research Question 6b9b26d93da94caf993c038d9efcdedb.pdf
Framing an Appropriate Research Question 6b9b26d93da94caf993c038d9efcdedb.pdfFraming an Appropriate Research Question 6b9b26d93da94caf993c038d9efcdedb.pdf
Framing an Appropriate Research Question 6b9b26d93da94caf993c038d9efcdedb.pdfUjwalaBharambe
 
AmericanHighSchoolsprezentacijaoskolama.
AmericanHighSchoolsprezentacijaoskolama.AmericanHighSchoolsprezentacijaoskolama.
AmericanHighSchoolsprezentacijaoskolama.arsicmarija21
 
CELL CYCLE Division Science 8 quarter IV.pptx
CELL CYCLE Division Science 8 quarter IV.pptxCELL CYCLE Division Science 8 quarter IV.pptx
CELL CYCLE Division Science 8 quarter IV.pptxJiesonDelaCerna
 
What is Model Inheritance in Odoo 17 ERP
What is Model Inheritance in Odoo 17 ERPWhat is Model Inheritance in Odoo 17 ERP
What is Model Inheritance in Odoo 17 ERPCeline George
 
“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...
“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...
“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...Marc Dusseiller Dusjagr
 
Final demo Grade 9 for demo Plan dessert.pptx
Final demo Grade 9 for demo Plan dessert.pptxFinal demo Grade 9 for demo Plan dessert.pptx
Final demo Grade 9 for demo Plan dessert.pptxAvyJaneVismanos
 
18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdf
18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdf18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdf
18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdfssuser54595a
 
DATA STRUCTURE AND ALGORITHM for beginners
DATA STRUCTURE AND ALGORITHM for beginnersDATA STRUCTURE AND ALGORITHM for beginners
DATA STRUCTURE AND ALGORITHM for beginnersSabitha Banu
 
Crayon Activity Handout For the Crayon A
Crayon Activity Handout For the Crayon ACrayon Activity Handout For the Crayon A
Crayon Activity Handout For the Crayon AUnboundStockton
 
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptxEmployee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptxNirmalaLoungPoorunde1
 
Blooming Together_ Growing a Community Garden Worksheet.docx
Blooming Together_ Growing a Community Garden Worksheet.docxBlooming Together_ Growing a Community Garden Worksheet.docx
Blooming Together_ Growing a Community Garden Worksheet.docxUnboundStockton
 
Earth Day Presentation wow hello nice great
Earth Day Presentation wow hello nice greatEarth Day Presentation wow hello nice great
Earth Day Presentation wow hello nice greatYousafMalik24
 
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptx
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptxECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptx
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptxiammrhaywood
 
Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17
Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17
Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17Celine George
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Hierarchy of management that covers different levels of management
Hierarchy of management that covers different levels of managementHierarchy of management that covers different levels of management
Hierarchy of management that covers different levels of management
 
Types of Journalistic Writing Grade 8.pptx
Types of Journalistic Writing Grade 8.pptxTypes of Journalistic Writing Grade 8.pptx
Types of Journalistic Writing Grade 8.pptx
 
Like-prefer-love -hate+verb+ing & silent letters & citizenship text.pdf
Like-prefer-love -hate+verb+ing & silent letters & citizenship text.pdfLike-prefer-love -hate+verb+ing & silent letters & citizenship text.pdf
Like-prefer-love -hate+verb+ing & silent letters & citizenship text.pdf
 
POINT- BIOCHEMISTRY SEM 2 ENZYMES UNIT 5.pptx
POINT- BIOCHEMISTRY SEM 2 ENZYMES UNIT 5.pptxPOINT- BIOCHEMISTRY SEM 2 ENZYMES UNIT 5.pptx
POINT- BIOCHEMISTRY SEM 2 ENZYMES UNIT 5.pptx
 
Capitol Tech U Doctoral Presentation - April 2024.pptx
Capitol Tech U Doctoral Presentation - April 2024.pptxCapitol Tech U Doctoral Presentation - April 2024.pptx
Capitol Tech U Doctoral Presentation - April 2024.pptx
 
Framing an Appropriate Research Question 6b9b26d93da94caf993c038d9efcdedb.pdf
Framing an Appropriate Research Question 6b9b26d93da94caf993c038d9efcdedb.pdfFraming an Appropriate Research Question 6b9b26d93da94caf993c038d9efcdedb.pdf
Framing an Appropriate Research Question 6b9b26d93da94caf993c038d9efcdedb.pdf
 
AmericanHighSchoolsprezentacijaoskolama.
AmericanHighSchoolsprezentacijaoskolama.AmericanHighSchoolsprezentacijaoskolama.
AmericanHighSchoolsprezentacijaoskolama.
 
CELL CYCLE Division Science 8 quarter IV.pptx
CELL CYCLE Division Science 8 quarter IV.pptxCELL CYCLE Division Science 8 quarter IV.pptx
CELL CYCLE Division Science 8 quarter IV.pptx
 
What is Model Inheritance in Odoo 17 ERP
What is Model Inheritance in Odoo 17 ERPWhat is Model Inheritance in Odoo 17 ERP
What is Model Inheritance in Odoo 17 ERP
 
“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...
“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...
“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...
 
Final demo Grade 9 for demo Plan dessert.pptx
Final demo Grade 9 for demo Plan dessert.pptxFinal demo Grade 9 for demo Plan dessert.pptx
Final demo Grade 9 for demo Plan dessert.pptx
 
18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdf
18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdf18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdf
18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdf
 
DATA STRUCTURE AND ALGORITHM for beginners
DATA STRUCTURE AND ALGORITHM for beginnersDATA STRUCTURE AND ALGORITHM for beginners
DATA STRUCTURE AND ALGORITHM for beginners
 
Crayon Activity Handout For the Crayon A
Crayon Activity Handout For the Crayon ACrayon Activity Handout For the Crayon A
Crayon Activity Handout For the Crayon A
 
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptxEmployee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
 
Blooming Together_ Growing a Community Garden Worksheet.docx
Blooming Together_ Growing a Community Garden Worksheet.docxBlooming Together_ Growing a Community Garden Worksheet.docx
Blooming Together_ Growing a Community Garden Worksheet.docx
 
Earth Day Presentation wow hello nice great
Earth Day Presentation wow hello nice greatEarth Day Presentation wow hello nice great
Earth Day Presentation wow hello nice great
 
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptx
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptxECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptx
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptx
 
Model Call Girl in Tilak Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
Model Call Girl in Tilak Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝Model Call Girl in Tilak Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
Model Call Girl in Tilak Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
 
Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17
Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17
Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17
 

e-Portfolio for Lab-Based Statistics (PSYC 3100) part 2 (7.presentation)

  • 1. PSYC 3100: LAB-BASED STATISTICS 7. PRESENTATION You are running with a temporary license GET FILE='D:2014.2015lab Based Statisticdone lab based questionnaireslab base spssLab Questionnaires.sav'. DATASET NAME DataSet0 WINDOW=FRONT. RECODE ItemB2 ItemB3 ItemB5 ItemB6 (1=4) (2=3) (3=2) (4=1). EXECUTE. COMPUTE Agreeableness=14 - ItemA1 + ItemA2 - ItemA3 + ItemA4 - ItemA5 + ItemA6 - ItemA7 + ItemA8 + ItemA9 + ItemA10. EXECUTE. COMPUTE ATW=ItemB1 + ItemB2 + ItemB3 + ItemB4 + ItemB5 + ItemB6 + ItemB7 + ItemB8 + ItemB9 + ItemB10. EXECUTE. RECODE Agreeableness (1 thru 13=1) (14 thru 26=2) (27 thru Highest=3) INTO AgreeablenessLevel. EXECUTE. RECODE ATW (1 thru 13=1) (14 thru 26=2) (Lowest thru 27=3) INTO ATWLevel. EXECUTE. FREQUENCIES VARIABLES=Agreeableness /STATISTICS=MINIMUM MAXIMUM SKEWNESS SESKEW KURTOSIS SEKURT/ORDER=ANALYSIS. FREQUENCIES VARIABLES=Agreeableness ATW ID Age Month Year Gender ItemA1 ItemA2 ItemA3 ItemA4 It emA5 ItemA6 ItemA7 ItemA8 ItemA9 ItemA10 ItemB1 ItemB2 ItemB3 ItemB4 ItemB5 ItemB6 ItemB7 ItemB8 It emB9 ItemB10 AgreeablenessLevel ATWLevel /STATISTICS=MINIMUM MAXIMUM /ORDER=ANALYSIS. Frequencies [DataSet1] D:2014.2015lab Based Statisticdone lab based questionnaireslab base spssLab Questionn aires.sav
  • 2. PSYC 3100: LAB-BASED STATISTICS Statistics N Minimum Maximum Valid Missing Agreeableness 31 1 19 36 Attitude Towards Woman 30 2 17 32 Id of respondent 32 0 1 32 Age of respondent 32 0 19 25 Respondent's month of birthday 32 0 1 19 Respondent's year of birthday 32 0 1989 2014 Gender of respondent 32 0 1 2 I feel little concern for others. 32 0 2 5 I am interested in people. 32 0 2 5 I do insult people. 31 1 1 4 I sympathize with other' feeling. 32 0 3 5 I am not interested in other people's problems. 32 0 1 5 I have a soft heart. 32 0 2 5 I am not really interested in others. 32 0 1 4 I spend some of my time for others. 32 0 2 5 I feel others' emotions. 32 0 2 5 I make people feel at ease. 32 0 3 5 Swearing and obscenity are more repulsive in the speech of a woman than of a man. 31 1 1 4 Under modern economic conditions with women being active outside the home, men should share in household task such as washing dishes and doing the laundry. 32 0 1 4 There should be a strict merit system in job appointment and promotion without regard to sex. 32 0 1 4 Women should worry less about their rights and more about becoming good wives and mothers. 32 0 1 4 Women earning as much as their dates should bear equally the expense when they go out together. 32 0 1 4 Women should assume their rightful place in business and all the professions along with men. 32 0 1 4 A woman should not expect to go to exactly the same places or to have quite the same freedom of action as a man. 31 1 1 4
  • 3. PSYC 3100: LAB-BASED STATISTICS In general, the father should have greater authority than the mother in the bringing up of children. 32 0 1 4 Women should be concerned with their duties of childbearing and house tending rather than with desires for professional or business careers. 32 0 1 4 The intellectual leadership of a community should be largely in the hands of men. 32 0 1 4 Agreeableness Level 31 1 2 3 Attitudes towards Woman Level 30 2 2 3 FREQUENCIES VARIABLES=ID Age Month Year Gender Agreeableness ATW /STATISTICS=MINIMUM MAXIMUM /ORDER=ANALYSIS. Frequencies [DataSet1] D:2014.2015lab Based Statisticdone lab based questionnaireslab base spssLab Questionn aires.sav Id of respondent Frequency Table Age of respondent Respondent's month of birthday Id of respondent Statistics Respondent's year of birthday Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 1 3.1 3.1 3.1 2 1 3.1 3.1 6.2 3 1 3.1 3.1 9.4 4 1 3.1 3.1 12.5 5 1 3.1 3.1 15.6 6 1 3.1 3.1 18.8 Gender of respondent Agreeableness Attitude Towards Woman N Valid 32 32 32 32 32 31 30 Missing 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 Minimum 1 19 1 1989 1 19 17 Maximum 32 25 19 2014 2 36 32
  • 4. PSYC 3100: LAB-BASED STATISTICS 7 1 3.1 3.1 21.9 8 1 3.1 3.1 25.0 9 1 3.1 3.1 28.1 10 1 3.1 3.1 31.2 11 1 3.1 3.1 34.4 12 1 3.1 3.1 37.5 13 1 3.1 3.1 40.6 14 1 3.1 3.1 43.8 15 1 3.1 3.1 46.9 16 1 3.1 3.1 50.0 17 1 3.1 3.1 53.1 18 1 3.1 3.1 56.2 19 1 3.1 3.1 59.4 20 1 3.1 3.1 62.5 21 1 3.1 3.1 65.6 22 1 3.1 3.1 68.8 23 1 3.1 3.1 71.9 24 1 3.1 3.1 75.0 25 1 3.1 3.1 78.1 26 1 3.1 3.1 81.2 27 1 3.1 3.1 84.4 28 1 3.1 3.1 87.5 29 1 3.1 3.1 90.6 30 1 3.1 3.1 93.8 31 1 3.1 3.1 96.9 32 1 3.1 3.1 100.0 Total 32 100.0 100.0
  • 5. PSYC 3100: LAB-BASED STATISTICS Age of respondent Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 19 1 3.1 3.1 3.1 20 1 3.1 3.1 6.2 21 7 21.9 21.9 28.1 22 5 15.6 15.6 43.8 23 14 43.8 43.8 87.5 24 2 6.2 6.2 93.8 25 2 6.2 6.2 100.0 Total 32 100.0 100.0 Respondent's month of birthday Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid January 2 6.2 6.2 6.2 February 1 3.1 3.1 9.4 March 3 9.4 9.4 18.8 April 6 18.8 18.8 37.5 May 3 9.4 9.4 46.9 July 2 6.2 6.2 53.1 August 8 25.0 25.0 78.1 September 2 6.2 6.2 84.4 October 1 3.1 3.1 87.5 November 1 3.1 3.1 90.6 December 2 6.2 6.2 96.9 19 1 3.1 3.1 100.0 Total 32 100.0 100.0
  • 6. PSYC 3100: LAB-BASED STATISTICS Respondent's year of birthday Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1989 2 6.2 6.2 6.2 1990 2 6.2 6.2 12.5 1991 14 43.8 43.8 56.2 1992 5 15.6 15.6 71.9 1993 6 18.8 18.8 90.6 1994 1 3.1 3.1 93.8 1995 1 3.1 3.1 96.9 2014 1 3.1 3.1 100.0 Total 32 100.0 100.0 Gender of respondent Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Male 16 50.0 50.0 50.0 Female 16 50.0 50.0 100.0 Total 32 100.0 100.0 Agreeableness Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 19 1 3.1 3.2 3.2 22 3 9.4 9.7 12.9 23 2 6.2 6.5 19.4 24 3 9.4 9.7 29.0 25 3 9.4 9.7 38.7 26 4 12.5 12.9 51.6 27 4 12.5 12.9 64.5 28 3 9.4 9.7 74.2 29 1 3.1 3.2 77.4 30 1 3.1 3.2 80.6 31 2 6.2 6.5 87.1 32 1 3.1 3.2 90.3 33 1 3.1 3.2 93.5 34 1 3.1 3.2 96.8
  • 7. PSYC 3100: LAB-BASED STATISTICS 36 1 3.1 3.2 100.0 Total 31 96.9 100.0 Missing 99 1 3.1 Total 32 100.0 Attitude Towards Woman Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 17 1 3.1 3.3 3.3 18 2 6.2 6.7 10.0 19 2 6.2 6.7 16.7 20 1 3.1 3.3 20.0 21 1 3.1 3.3 23.3 22 3 9.4 10.0 33.3 23 3 9.4 10.0 43.3 24 5 15.6 16.7 60.0 25 2 6.2 6.7 66.7 26 2 6.2 6.7 73.3 27 2 6.2 6.7 80.0 28 1 3.1 3.3 83.3 29 2 6.2 6.7 90.0 30 1 3.1 3.3 93.3 31 1 3.1 3.3 96.7 32 1 3.1 3.3 100.0 Total 30 93.8 100.0 Missing 99 2 6.2 Total 32 100.0 FREQUENCIES VARIABLES=ID Age Month Year Gender Agreeableness ATW /STATISTICS=MINIMUM MAXIMUM /ORDER=ANALYSIS. Frequencies [DataSet1] D:2014.2015lab Based Statisticdone lab based questionnaireslab base spssLab Questionn aires.sav
  • 8. PSYC 3100: LAB-BASED STATISTICS Statistics Id of respondent Age of respondent Respondent's month of birthday Respondent's year of birthday Gender of respondent Agreeableness Attitude Towards Woman N Valid 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 Missing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Minimum 1 9 1 1989 1 19 17 Maximum 32 25 12 1995 2 36 32 Frequency Table Id of respondent Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 1 3.1 3.1 3.1 2 1 3.1 3.1 6.2 3 1 3.1 3.1 9.4 4 1 3.1 3.1 12.5 5 1 3.1 3.1 15.6 6 1 3.1 3.1 18.8 7 1 3.1 3.1 21.9 8 1 3.1 3.1 25.0 9 1 3.1 3.1 28.1 10 1 3.1 3.1 31.2 11 1 3.1 3.1 34.4 12 1 3.1 3.1 37.5 13 1 3.1 3.1 40.6 14 1 3.1 3.1 43.8 15 1 3.1 3.1 46.9 16 1 3.1 3.1 50.0 17 1 3.1 3.1 53.1 18 1 3.1 3.1 56.2 19 1 3.1 3.1 59.4 20 1 3.1 3.1 62.5 21 1 3.1 3.1 65.6
  • 9. PSYC 3100: LAB-BASED STATISTICS 22 1 3.1 3.1 68.8 23 1 3.1 3.1 71.9 24 1 3.1 3.1 75.0 25 1 3.1 3.1 78.1 26 1 3.1 3.1 81.2 27 1 3.1 3.1 84.4 28 1 3.1 3.1 87.5 29 1 3.1 3.1 90.6 30 1 3.1 3.1 93.8 31 1 3.1 3.1 96.9 32 1 3.1 3.1 100.0 Total 32 100.0 100.0 Age of respondent Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 9 1 3.1 3.1 3.1 20 1 3.1 3.1 6.2 21 7 21.9 21.9 28.1 22 5 15.6 15.6 43.8 23 14 43.8 43.8 87.5 24 2 6.2 6.2 93.8 25 2 6.2 6.2 100.0 Total 32 100.0 100.0 Respondent's month of birthday Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid January 2 6.2 6.2 6.2 February 1 3.1 3.1 9.4 March 3 9.4 9.4 18.8 April 6 18.8 18.8 37.5 May 3 9.4 9.4 46.9 July 2 6.2 6.2 53.1 August 8 25.0 25.0 78.1 September 3 9.4 9.4 87.5
  • 10. PSYC 3100: LAB-BASED STATISTICS October 1 3.1 3.1 90.6 November 1 3.1 3.1 93.8 December 2 6.2 6.2 100.0 Total 32 100.0 100.0 Respondent's year of birthday Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1989 2 6.2 6.2 6.2 1990 2 6.2 6.2 12.5 1991 14 43.8 43.8 56.2 1992 5 15.6 15.6 71.9 1993 7 21.9 21.9 93.8 1994 1 3.1 3.1 96.9 1995 1 3.1 3.1 100.0 Total 32 100.0 100.0 Gender of respondent Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Male 16 50.0 50.0 50.0 Female 16 50.0 50.0 100.0 Total 32 100.0 100.0 Agreeableness Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 19 1 3.1 3.1 3.1 22 3 9.4 9.4 12.5 23 2 6.2 6.2 18.8 24 3 9.4 9.4 28.1 25 3 9.4 9.4 37.5 26 4 12.5 12.5 50.0 27 5 15.6 15.6 65.6 28 3 9.4 9.4 75.0 29 1 3.1 3.1 78.1 30 1 3.1 3.1 81.2
  • 11. PSYC 3100: LAB-BASED STATISTICS 31 2 6.2 6.2 87.5 32 1 3.1 3.1 90.6 33 1 3.1 3.1 93.8 34 1 3.1 3.1 96.9 36 1 3.1 3.1 100.0 Total 32 100.0 100.0 Attitude Towards Woman Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 17 1 3.1 3.1 3.1 18 2 6.2 6.2 9.4 19 2 6.2 6.2 15.6 20 1 3.1 3.1 18.8 21 1 3.1 3.1 21.9 22 3 9.4 9.4 31.2 23 4 12.5 12.5 43.8 24 6 18.8 18.8 62.5 25 2 6.2 6.2 68.8 26 2 6.2 6.2 75.0 27 2 6.2 6.2 81.2 28 1 3.1 3.1 84.4 29 2 6.2 6.2 90.6 30 1 3.1 3.1 93.8 31 1 3.1 3.1 96.9 32 1 3.1 3.1 100.0 Total 32 100.0 100.0 GRAPH /HISTOGRAM(NORMAL)=Agreeableness. Graph [DataSet1] D:2014.2015lab Based Statisticdone lab based questionnaireslab base spssLab Questionn aires.sav
  • 12. PSYC 3100: LAB-BASED STATISTICS GRAPH /HISTOGRAM(NORMAL)=ATW. Graph [DataSet1] D:2014.2015lab Based Statisticdone lab based questionnaireslab base spssLab Questionn aires.sav
  • 13. PSYC 3100: LAB-BASED STATISTICS PPLOT /VARIABLES=Agreeableness ATW /NOLOG /NOSTANDARDIZE /TYPE=P-P /FRACTION=BLOM /TIES=MEAN /DIST=NORMAL. PPlot [DataSet1] D:2014.2015lab Based Statisticdone lab based questionnaireslab base spssLab Questionn aires.sav Model Description Model Name MOD_1 Series or Sequence 1 Agreeableness 2 Attitude Towards Woman Transformation None Non-Seasonal Differencing 0 Seasonal Differencing 0 Length of Seasonal Period No periodicity Standardization Not applied Distribution Type Normal Location estimated Scale estimated Fractional Rank Estimation Method Blom's Rank Assigned to Ties Mean rank of tied values Applying the model specifications from MOD_1 Case Processing Summary Agreeableness Attitude Towards Woman Series or Sequence Length 32 32 Number of Missing Values in the Plot User-Missing 0 0 System-Missing 0 0 The cases are unweighted.
  • 14. PSYC 3100: LAB-BASED STATISTICS Estimated Distribution Parameters Agreeableness Attitude Towards Woman Normal Distribution Location 26.78 24.03 Scale 3.816 3.831 The cases are unweighted. Agreeableness
  • 15. PSYC 3100: LAB-BASED STATISTICS Attitude Towards Woman
  • 16. PSYC 3100: LAB-BASED STATISTICS PPLOT /VARIABLES=Agreeableness ATW /NOLOG /NOSTANDARDIZE /TYPE=Q-Q /FRACTION=BLOM /TIES=MEAN /DIST=NORMAL. PPlot [DataSet1] D:2014.2015lab Based Statisticdone lab based questionnaireslab base spssLab Questionn aires.sav Model Description Model Name MOD_2 Series or Sequence 1 Agreeableness 2 Attitude Towards Woman Transformation None Non-Seasonal Differencing 0 Seasonal Differencing 0 Length of Seasonal Period No periodicity Standardization Not applied Distribution Type Normal Location estimated Scale estimated Fractional Rank Estimation Method Blom's Rank Assigned to Ties Mean rank of tied values Applying the model specifications from MOD_2 Case Processing Summary Agreeableness Attitude Towards Woman Series or Sequence Length 32 32 Number of Missing Values in the Plot User-Missing 0 0 System-Missing 0 0 The cases are unweighted.
  • 17. PSYC 3100: LAB-BASED STATISTICS Estimated Distribution Parameters Agreeableness Attitude Towards Woman Normal Distribution Location 26.78 24.03 Scale 3.816 3.831 The cases are unweighted. Agreeableness
  • 18. PSYC 3100: LAB-BASED STATISTICS Attitude Towards Woman DESCRIPTIVES VARIABLES=Agreeableness ATW /STATISTICS=MEAN STDDEV MIN MAX KURTOSIS SKEWNESS.
  • 19. PSYC 3100: LAB-BASED STATISTICS Descriptives [DataSet1] D:2014.2015lab Based Statisticdone lab based questionnaireslab base spssLab Questionn aires.sav Descriptive Statistics N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation Skewness Kurtosis Statistic Statistic Statistic Statistic Statistic Statistic Std. Error Statistic Std. Error Agreeableness 32 19 36 26.78 3.816 .465 .414 .157 .809 Attitude Towards Woman 32 17 32 24.03 3.831 .165 .414 -.389 .809 Valid N (listwise) 32