This is Part 2 of a 2 Part presentation.
Part 1 - Presents the reality we face teaching in the 21st Century (view at http://bit.ly/WIW56k.)
Part 2 - The Multiple uses of clickers
Note: some fonts and image alignment has changed during the upload!
Abstract: Successfully preparing the students of today for the world of tomorrow requires a new approach to teaching. This presentation includes a visit to the origins of the classroom, teaching in the industrial revolution and then presents the reality we face teaching in the 21st Century.
Clickers are an effective teaching tool that help facilitate pedagogical best practices, allowing lecturers to deliver instruction and assessment simultaneously, enhance learning while students actively participate in your lessons without fear of humiliation.
The workshop will cover some of the pedagogical literature and learning theories that clicker technology supports, offer a practical demonstration of peer instruction and demonstration some practical tips on how to effectively use and benefit from clickers in your lectures.
3. 1. Using clickers
a) Classroom Environment benefits
b) Learning benefits
c) Assessment benefits
d) Learning Goals
e) How people learn
2. Pedagogical literature and learning theories
a) Peer Instruction
3. Classroom Strategies with clickers
a) Writing Clicker Questions
b) Bloom’s Taxonomy
c) Clicker question goals
d) Teaching Choices
e) Common Pitfalls
4. How to get started
5. Purchase Models
6. Product Offering
7. References and Resources
7. http://larrycuban.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/large_lecture-hall.jpg
30%
Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, Vol. 9, No. 1, January 2009, pp. 13 - 26.
An empirical study of personal response technology for improving attendance and learning in a large class
Amy Shapiro
8. http://larrycuban.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/large_lecture-hall.jpg
70%
‘LEARNING BY REMOTE CONTROL’: EXPLORING THE USE OF AN AUDIENCE RESPONSE SYSTEM AS A VEHICLE FOR CONTENT DELIVERY
Jeremy B. Williams - Brisbane Graduate School of Business - Queensland University of Technology, AUSTRALIA (2003)
13. 1. Kay RH and LeSage A. Examining the benefits and challenges of using audience response
systems: a review of the literature. Computers and Education. 2009; 53:819-27. http://prayas2k12.com/main/events.php?id=7
14. http://africa360degrees.co.za/
1. Kay RH and LeSage A. Examining the benefits and challenges of using audience response
systems: a review of the literature. Computers and Education. 2009; 53:819-27.
15. http://asiasociety.org/files/teacher_0.jpg
1. Kay RH and LeSage A. Examining the benefits and challenges of using audience response
systems: a review of the literature. Computers and Education. 2009; 53:819-27.
16. http://www.5hue.com/
1. Kay RH and LeSage A. Examining the benefits and challenges of using audience response
systems: a review of the literature. Computers and Education. 2009; 53:819-27.
18. 1. Kay RH and LeSage A. Examining the benefits and challenges of using audience response
systems: a review of the literature. Computers and Education. 2009; 53:819-27.
19.
20. 1. Kay RH and LeSage A. Examining the benefits and challenges of using audience response
systems: a review of the literature. Computers and Education. 2009; 53:819-27.
http://onlinelearninginsights.wordpress.com/2012/04/03/good-bad-and-ugly-student-comments-on-group-work-in-e-learning/
21. http://www.edutopia.org/healthier-testing-made-easy
1. Kay RH and LeSage A. Examining the benefits and challenges of using audience response
systems: a review of the literature. Computers and Education. 2009; 53:819-27.
22.
23.
24. * Reflect – the key abilities, attitudes, and items of mastery
* Help – “know what they need to know”
* Measurable – not vague
Ways of Using TEFA - Ian D. Beatty, Scientific Reasoning Research Institute, University of Massachusetts Amherst
25. Should…
* Nourish – intellectual curiosity
* Encourage – independent learning
* Aid development – for more complex thinking
* Increase knowledge – content retention and understanding
Ways of Using TEFA - Ian D. Beatty, Scientific Reasoning Research Institute, University of Massachusetts Amherst
26.
27. Kathy Perkins, Director of the PhET Interactive Simulations Project
and Director of Colorado Universities’ Science Education Initiative
28. Kathy Perkins, Director of the PhET Interactive Simulations Project
and Director of Colorado Universities’ Science Education Initiative
29. Kathy Perkins, Director of the PhET Interactive Simulations Project
and Director of Colorado Universities’ Science Education Initiative
30. Remember!
Students
must do
their
own
learning;
we cannot
do the
http://www.thecultureconcept.com/circle/national-year-reading-2012-creating-the-future-of-
Stephanie Chasteen (PhD) learning never to young to learn
31.
32. # Learning Theory Researcher(s) Suggested Application Features
1
Immediate Epstein Immediate Feedback Assessment Technique Chart with Correct Answer Indicator/ Participant
Feedback promotes learning and corrects inaccurate first responses Monitor / Individual Reports
2 Engagement Prensky Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Fastest Responder / Priority Ranking or Ranking Wizard
Greene Spacing effects in memory: Evidence for a two-
3 Spacing Effect Continue Prior Session / Essay Slide
process account
Mazur Peer Instruction: Ten Years of Experience and Repoll / Comparative Linking/ Comparative Linking
4 Peer Instruction Reports
Results
Bruff Teaching with classroom response systems: Creating On the Fly Slides / Conditional Branching /Moment to
5 Agile Teaching active learning environments Moment
Keller Use of the ARCS Motivation Model in Courseware Countdown Timer/Response Grids /Leader
6 Motivation Boards/Gaming Slides / Point Values
Design
Assessment FOR Point Values / TurningPoint AnyWhere–Live Charts
7 Stiggins Putting testing in perspective: It’s for learning
Learning Anonymous Polling /Review Only/Comparative Linking
8
Positive Reid Practicing effective instruction: The Exemplary Center Correct Answer Indicator /Fastest Responders/Leader
Reinforcement for Reading Instruction approach Boards /Point Values
Game Based Team Slides Fastest Responder Wager Leader Boards
9 Dede Immersive Interfaces for Engagement and Learning Speed Scoring TPAW with Digital Games Team Scoring
Learning Reports
Bonwell and Eison Active learning: Creating excitement in “Need Help” answer choice /On the Fly
10 Active Learning Questions/Custom / Text Message/Feedback
the classroom
Demographic Comparison Data Slicing /Convert to
11 Learning Styles Keefe Learning Style Theory and Practice
Picture Slide Chart Colors–Correct/Incorrect /Answer
Now/ Video/Audio files with question slides
12
Socratic Hake Socratic pedagogy in the introductory physics lab
Custom Standards List / Conditional Branching
Questioning Continue Prior Session
36. “Teachers found that they could teach the material more
efficiently using question-driven instruction. They found that they
had a deeper understanding of students' difficulties, allowing
them to tune their instruction more efficiently. Plus, in later
units, students' grasp of the underlying material helps them
progress through the units more quickly.”
Stephanie Chasteen (PhD)
Science Teaching Fellow at Science
Education Initiative, University of
Colorado at Boulder
Independent Business
Owner, sciencegeekgirl enterprises
37. Instructor Poses
Question (< 1min)
Students Answer
Independently
(1-3 min)
Most correct Most incorrect Equal split
Briefly discuss Back track Discuss in pairs
(< 1min) (5 min+) Revote (1-5 min)
Instructor lead
Class wide discussion
Revote (2-15 min)
94. I want to get
• Jump right in –
STARTED!
• Consider borrowing a set of clickers to try out in a few class sessions
• Don’t grade clicker questions in the beginning, this way if you have
technical difficulties students grades are not at risk and students
will not be concerned.
• Start with simple questions, then move
up the Blooms Taxonomy towards more
conceptual questions, then look
to introduce Peer Instruction.
95. Purchase
Models
• ‘Teaching with Technology’
department purchases and loans
clickers to lecturers
• Departments budget and
purchase
96. Purchase
Models
• Some Universities ‘rent’ their
clickers to students
• Deposit paid ( 50% refundable)
• Funds to purchase more
97. Purchase
Models
• Bookstore model
• (not yet available in South Africa)
• Clickers are provided with a
textbook
• Clicker content included for lecture
100. Clicker Devices
ResponseCard® NXT ResponseCard® RF LCD ResponseCard® RF ResponseWare
Offers advanced Durable radio frequency ResponseCard RF Allows students to
capabilities such as device offers students an clickers are respond via web
cell phone style text engaging and easy-to-use lightweight and browsers on any web
entry for short solution. LCD screen compact in size. enabled device including
answer and essay provides visual The durable clicker Android™, iPhone®, Black
questions as well as confirmation of selected has been rigorously Berry®, and laptops or
self-paced test mode responses, channel tested in classroom tablets to immediately
for individual setting and battery life. environments. transfer their selection to
assessment. polling applications.
104. Polling Hardware
Poll without a Computer or Projector
ResponseCard AnyWhere
Display student results anywhere, anytime.
105. Presenter Tools
Remain Agile while Polling
PresenterWare
Provides instructors remote
control of polling software
through mobile devices.
PresenterCard
Radio frequency hardware device
that interacts with polling software.
106. LMS & Registration
1. Learning Management Systems
2. Seamlessly pull rosters and import/export into today's
most popular LMS.
• Easy to maintain
• Secure
107. Distance Learning
1. RemotePoll
2. Simultaneously poll students in multiple
classrooms through the Internet to gather and
display results from all locations for complete
analysis.
3. ResponseWare
4. Allow students to respond via web browsers on
any web enabled device to immediately transfer
their selection to polling applications.
108. References
1. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, Vol. 9, No. 1, January 2009, pp.
13 - 26. An empirical study of personal response technology for improving
attendance and learning in a large class Amy Shapiro
2. ‘LEARNING BY REMOTE CONTROL’: EXPLORING THE USE OF AN AUDIENCE
RESPONSE SYSTEM AS A VEHICLE FOR CONTENT DELIVERY Jeremy B. Williams -
Brisbane Graduate School of Business - Queensland University of
Technology, AUSTRALIA (2003)
3. Hall et al. (2005) Student Response System in High Enrollment Courses Kay RH and
LeSage A. Examining the benefits and challenges of using audience response
systems: a review of the literature. Computers and Education. 2009; 53:819-27.
University of Missouri - Rolla
4. Student Response Systems: Interactivity in a Classroom Environment Harold M.
Horowitz, Ph.D., Program Director Educational Technology IBM Corporate Education
Center, Thornwood, New York 10594
5. Kathy Perkins, Director of the PhET Interactive Simulations Project and Director of
Colorado Universities’ Science Education Initiative
6. Ways of Using TEFA - Ian D. Beatty, Scientific Reasoning Research
Institute, University of Massachusetts Amherst
109. Great books on clickers
1. Peer Instruction (Eric Mazur)
2. Teaching with Classroom Response Systems (Derek Bruff)
3. Clickers in the Classroom (Douglas Duncan)
4. Clickers in Chemistry (Margaret Asirvatham)
111. Thanks for listening!
David Wilson
Office: 086 110 6365
Web: www.participate.co.za
Blog: www.clickers.co.za
Facebook –www.facebook.com/ParticipateSA
Twitter - @participateSA
Twitter personal – @davew_sa
Editor's Notes
Due to the interactive nature of using clickers and active involvement in the lesson
Quality of learning: Qualitative difference when learning with ARS (e.g., better explanations, thinking about important concepts, resolving misconceptions)
SHOULD describe how a student should be different at the end of a courseReflect the key abilities, attitudes, and items of mastery that a student should (strive to) attainShould be measurable ( not vague, watch terminology)Help students “know what they need to know” in a course.THEY SHOULD*nourishment of intellectual curiosity, * encouragement of independent learners,*development of people able to engage in the more complex thinking processes* knowledge of content* NB Instructor behaviour is aligned with this in the teaching techniques
THEY SHOULD*nourishment of intellectual curiosity, * encouragement of independent learners,*development of people able to engage in the more complex thinking processes* knowledge of content* NB Instructor behaviour is aligned with this in the teaching techniques
Motivation depends on students’ background, and can be changed.How to motivate?
Students need to actively construct an understanding.Construction requires feedback. How to promote active learning?How to provide feedback?
How to find out and connect to what they already know?
Think pair share!
Many instructors see value in structuring a class session into a sequence of activities as a way to help students maintain their attention helps students pay attentionhelp focus their attention in productive ways on particular tasks. gather information from students in order to determine the direction of a class sessiongiving all students a voice in determining that direction.
fun help students maintain attention and engagement with course activities. Fun helps instructors establish a useful rapport with their students. Some students find competition motivating.
Anonymity uncovers student perspectives that might not be clear through other meansStudents are able to determine what they understand, what they do not understand, and how they are learning.Instructors learn a lot about what their students understand more frequently through clicker questions that can be acted on before major assessments are assigned. collect information from all students in a classroom quickly, easily, and simultaneously.
conduct background knowledge probes at the beginning of class sessions Points grades for attendance
These levels expect deeper conceptual understandingQuestion creation exceriseUse the Bloom’s Taxonomy worksheet to rate the Bloom’s level of your questionSwap your question with a neighbor. Do you agree on the Bloom’s level of your question?Can you think of a way to “Bloomify up” the level of your question?
Type “ConcepTests” into google This brings up listings of question collections in numerous fields.
What student learning goals do I have for the question? Consider…1. Mechanics (is it well written? Clear?)2. Depth (Is it trivial, or deep? What level ofBloom’s Taxonomy?)3. Goals (What is this question trying toaccomplish,pedagogically)
Content Goal: Does the question test an essential aspect of the material? Is it aligned with your learning goal?Cognitive Goal: How do students use the content to arrive at the answer? What does it mean to learn or “do” this subject?What are the cognitive processes involved? Are they comparing and contrasting phenomena, ranking, classifying, or performing a mathematical manipulation?Metacognitive Goal: Are students examining their own thinking?
What do I want my students to learn by asking this question?
How might this question be used to engage students with course content in small-group or classwide discussions or by creating a time for telling? Use questions that will prompt discussion.
What distribution of response do I expect to see from my students?What might I do if the actual distribution turns out very differently?
Look for answer choices for potential clicker questions in student responses to open-ended questions, ones asked on assignments in previous courses, on homework questions, or during class. This can lead to answer choices that better match common student misconceptions and perspectives.Don’t make them too easy.
Use a variety of types of clicker questions. experimenting with different kinds of questions can help instructors use clickers in ways that engage students and meet course learning goals Experiment with asking on-the-fly clicker questions Often a classwide discussion leads to spontaneous clicker questions; other times rhetorical questions can be turned into productive clicker questions.
spend a least some time on each of the answer choices – right and wrong ones. Students often appreciate hearing their instructor’s perspective on the answer choices they selected
Find other instructors who teach with classroom response systems and share experiences.
Provides feedback to teacher about student knowledge status
About new ideas, concepts and knowledge
Prepare for new knowledge and understanding
Give students a voice (i.e., survey on their opinions/preferences)
• Are often focused on conceptual understanding• Deal with important ideas in class• Have common student mistakes (consider answers from past exams orquizzes) as the wrong answers.• Result in a lot of discussion and debate among the students.• Require analysis and reasoning (not simple memorization).
• Are often focused on conceptual understanding• Deal with important ideas in class• Have common student mistakes (consider answers from past exams orquizzes) as the wrong answers.• Result in a lot of discussion and debate among the students.• Require analysis and reasoning (not simple memorization).
Given that having students respond to and discuss clicker questions takes class time, do instructors using clickers find it difficult to include as much content in their courses as they would without clickers? o Some instructors find it difficult to include as much content in their courses when they begin using clickers but are satisfied with the trade-off. They believe that if students’ misconceptions are not addressed, subsequent course material will not make sense to students, so class time spent resolving those misconceptions through clicker questions is well spent. Other instructors are satisfied with covering less material because they believe that teaching methods that actively engage students with course material are more effective in the long term than less engaging methods that allow for more time-efficient coverage of content.
Grading clicker questions on accuracy can give students who correctly answer critical thinking questions the false sense that they have mastered those questions, when in fact it is often quite possible to answer such questions correctly without fully understanding all the reasons for and against the answer choices. Grading clicker questions on accuracy increases the pressure students feel to master course material. Some instructors want their students to feel this pressure, since it can motivate them to seriously engage with course material as it is being presented during class. Other dislike creating high-pressure classroom environments and prefer to grade clicker questions on effort, not accuracy.
How long should students be given to submit their answers to a clicker question? When should an instructor call time and end voting?
immediately after gives the students rapid feedback on their learning and can add a bit of dramatic flair Askstudents to write down reasons that the answers they did not choose are incorrectsome students disengage when they learn the correct answer sometimes without fully understandingDelay showing to generate small-group or classwide discussion
First timers should test the system as thoroughly Limit use to start withHave a backup plan in mindmalfunctioning clickers – have sparesConsider on-the-fly questions
First timers should test the system as thoroughly Limit use to start withHave a backup plan in mindmalfunctioning clickers – have sparesConsider on-the-fly questions
Question Idea – confusion meter?I’m bored – speed upI’m with youSlow down a littleI’m totally lostQuestion Idea – Are you done?Click in with your progressStill workingAlmost doneFinished
"Wait-time" is the amount of time after an initial question has been posed before the teacher answers it him or herself; repeats, rephrases, or adds further information to the question; or accepts an answer from a student. More than just a few seconds are a necessary prerequisite for mental information-processing (Rowe, 1974).
By far the most common failing is to make questions that are too easy. In this situation, students often see the questions as simply a quiz to keep them awake, and they are annoyed that they had to spend money on clickers only for this purpose. easy questions may mislead students as to the difficulty of the questions they would expect to see on the exam
You should discuss how clickers will improve your communication with them, the well-established value to learning when students actively engaged in thinking about the subject and figuring out answers to questions, and how clickers make this much easier to achieve in a lecture setting.start with a “Why do you think we use clickers” clicker question in class, as shown below. Possible answers are all components of “active learning” and hopefully you will see a spread of answers.