On The Duty Of Civil Disobedience Rhetorical Analysis

On The Duty Of Civil Disobedience Rhetorical Analysis
An Expedient Government When America was founded and started to colonize, the people needed to create a government system. They established a
government that included many political positions and the three branches of government: legislative, executive, and judicial. Throughout history, the
government has changed and adapted to the political status of the country and the world. In the Declaration of Independence, written by Thomas
Jefferson, he states the purpose of government was: "To secure these rights [to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness] governments are instituted
among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed." However, Henry David Thoreau does not agree with everything Jefferson
states. In Thoreau's essay, On The Duty ofCivil Disobedience, he contradicts ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He is very persuasive and creditable in his work by proving his observations. The government is expedient because it is necessary for law and order.
On the other hand, it is not expedient. It is not fair and equal to the minority because they are focused to adapt to the new laws and beliefs the
politicians enforce. Thoreau understands the dangers and threats of a government that does not allow people to think for themselves. He believes that
people should follow their own consciences rather than do what they are told. Thoreau opposes the government because it chose to fight Mexico in the
Mexican–American War and support slavery for the South's commerce and agriculture. Thoreau believes this is inhumane and completely wrong. As a
result, he did not pay his taxes. Thoreau found the government to be abused and corrupt by the politicians in power. They use the power for their own
personal gain instead of benefiting the majority of the people. Thoreau strongly opposed the corrupt, unreliable, selfish government throughout his
essay, On The Duty of Civil
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Civil Disobedience Dbq
Throughout history, people's opinion on how the government should govern has shifted back and forth. Some men think that it should be all ruling and
powerful, while others think that it should have a very menial role in society. One of the men that thought it should have a menial role in society was
Henry David Thoreau and he made that evident in his document called Civil Disobedience. Thoreau believed he was simply asking for a "better
government" but in reality he was stirring up the thoughts of many others. Thoreau's opinions are presented in a clear, strong, powerful, convincing and
intelligent manner, One of Thoreau's strong, powerful opinions is that the purpose of government is to actually govern as little as possible and let the
people ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The word expedient in this context means suitable for achieving a particular end, something that is a means to an end. All governments are
expedient by the fact that the government helps inspire self ruling and independent people that doesn't have to rely solely on the government. All
governments are practical in a sense by; they tax in order to keep their nation afloat, they keep their nation safe by have laws and they do their best
to chose a suitable person to lead the nation in the right direction. All governments are also not expedient because they act impulsive and immoral.
For example, war, they may think that at the moment it is the best decision for their nation, but it may end up being very detrimental and harmful to
the land and the people. Another example is slavery, at the time, for some odd reason, the government thought it was acceptable for people to own
slaves and mistreat them, when in all actuality it was never okay and it was always immoral. Thoreau believes that the government has been "abused
and perverted" because the people had the power and ability to get things/jobs done on their own, but yet they still chose to go through the
government in hopes that it would be unbiased and fair. But, in reality the government is just as biased and corrupt as the people were. All of the
people in government positions had their own opinion and sometimes they would get greedy and selfish so they would vote for what was best for
them, even if it isn't best for the rest of the nations people. Which is why Thoreau believed the government was "abused and

Thoreau And Roger Williams Comparison Essay
Roger Williams and Henry Thoreau both have their own, unique ideas of freedom. In some ways, their ideas can be fairly similar. However, they
can also be very different. Whether it's the way they execute how to make an idea become reality, or the way they think about certain problems in
general. Williams and Thoreau may have similar ideas, however, they are still two very different people. One idea that can be compared is that they
both see the need for people to rely on each other to keep everything in order. However, the reasons behind them wanting this communication isn't
similar at all. Williams believed that people had to accept religious freedom, or else society would fail. He states that if people can't accept each other,
then nobody... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In Williams eyes, these actions should lead Thoreau on the path to prison.
Another major idea Williams has is that everyone should contribute and uphold the law. In the reading, Williams states:
"If any of the seamen refuse to perform their services, or passengers to pass their freight; If any refuse to help, in person or purse, towards the
common charges or defense; If any refuse to obey the common laws and orders of the ship, concerning their common peace or preservation; – I say, I
never denied, but in such cases, whatever is pretended, the commander or commanders may judge, resist, compel, and punish such transgressors,
according to their deserts and

Rhetorical Analysis Thoreau
From a rhetorical standpoint, what makes Thoreau's speech effective–what strategies and rhetorical appeals emphasize his points or make his argument
convincing? Thoreau's speech effective because throughout the essay Thoreau uses literary technique and Rhetoric devices to convey messages to his
audience. In particularly he includes William Paley thoughts on government to prove his points: therefore Thoreau uses ethos in his essay reveals some
sort of authority. On the other hand, he uses literary devices such as irony because Thoreau mentions that government governs least is the best
government however later in the paragraph he also mentions that government doesn't governs at all is the best government.
Identify the key features of Thoreau's writing style (his sentence structure, diction, tone, use of figurative language). Which do you like and which
frustrated you? Metaphor: He uses "machine" to describes citizen, who are continuously listening to the government without questioning them and they
are like machine because they do not stop they are continuously working. Tone: Incredulous because Thoreau criticizes the government throughout the
essay and he is unwilling to believe in government system. Diction: The word "wood" and "stone" have a negative connotation the words are implying
that citizens are turn into a objects and they are not alive. For example, machine listen to people without questioning likewise citizen are listening to
government without questioning them.
What, from your own analysis, is Thoreau's MAIN point? There is a flaws in our government system therefore we must government system. In order to
reform government system people should stop accepting government decision, instead of accepting government decision they should disobey the law.
Also, his purpose is to point out his audience that citizens are machines they accept everything government told them to do therefore he is criticizing
them and he believes they are responsible for the flaws in the government system. Therefore, he likes people who are go against government like him.
With which arguments of Thoreau do you agree? The current government system is flawed

Primitivism In Canada
(2025)An Analysis of the Multicultural Identity of Aboriginal Peoples and the Stereotypical Myth of Primitivism in Canadian Society
This Canadian study will define the multicultural identity of The First Peoples and the stereotypical myth of primitivism in the 21st century. In modern
Canadian society, the myth of aboriginal peoples is often based on the stereotype of primitive historical examples of identity that make them inferior to
"modern" European society. These societal traits tend to diminish the identity of aboriginals in order to maintain the superiority of European culture and
society that has been dominant in Canadian governmental policies and social stereotypes related to primitivism. More importantly, Canadian
aboriginals had ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In this context, the conflict between aboriginal and white communities in Canada has become a more diversified and complex form of social interaction.
At the governmental level, the rights of indigenous peoples has been suspect, since the white hegemonic Anglophile and Francophile governments have
refused the same rights to aboriginals than those in the white communities, These are important ways to understand how government responses to
aboriginal stereotypes are devolving in favor of these broader cultural identities for aboriginal people in

Snowden And The United States
Unless you were hiding beneath a rock in 2014, you saw the nation's reaction to the release of classified NSA documents by the infamous whistleblower
Edward Snowden. Snowden, who worked as the lead technologist for Dell, managed their accounts with the Central Intelligence Agency. It was in this
position that Snowden began to notice some classified documents that didn't make sense. These documents contained information on the National
Security Agency illegally spying on their own citizens. It was at this time in 2012 that Snowden began downloading some of these files for himself. It is
estimated that he downloaded somewhere between 50,000 and 200,000 files on the espionage efforts of the United States (Borrough, Ellison, Andrews,
2014). Now, Snowden needed to get the files out to the people. He attempted to contact a few media outlets around the world who would not go
through the trouble to follow his strict encryption methods. Snowden eventually contacted documentarian Laura Poitras, who had recently written an
article on a separate whistleblower that caught Snowden's attention. Poitras states in an interview with Salon.com that, "...he'd contacted me because
my border harassment meant that I'd been a person who had been selected. To be selected –and he went through a whole litany of things – means that
everything you do, every friend you have, every purchase you make, every street you cross means you're being watched" (Carmon, 2013). This connect
lead to Snowden being

Better Government : Civil Disobedience, By Henry David...
Better Government Henry David Thoreau, wrote an assay about "Civil Disobedience" in 1849. Thoreau a man whit strong believes about
government been needed for the people, but needed to be modified. The writer states that, "government is best which governs least" the best
government is the one who rules a nation by putting innocent people to risk to keep them safe. For example, the Mexican war, a war that a
president set as one of his four goals throughout his presidency. Thoreau, decided to spend a night on jail instead of paying his poll taxes, taxes
that till this day is hard to understand why people pay taxes everyday and at the end of the year there is more taxes taking out of citizen grand total
earn. Thoreau claims, "not at once no government, but at once a better government" people need rules, laws and protection. People need government,
a government that cares for each and one of them as a human being. What the government needs is less wars, better government, and reduce taxes, so
citizens can make a decent living. The government only cares for the people while the government tries to achieve its goal, once the goal is archived,
the people are forgotten. As a member of a society people's opinion should have more value and be more consider of what citizens want and need from
their government. Government speeches and promises for the families of the recruits to go fight for the nation are highly

Henry David Thoreau 's Civil Disobedience And Machiavelli
On March 13, 1964, Kitty Genovese was on her way back to her home in Queens, New York. Sometime before her home, she was attacked and
stabbed by a serial killer. Despite thirty eight witnesses supposedly on scene, no one attempted to contact the police until the attacker was gone. This
situation is a great example of a phenomenon called the bystander effect, which basically states that the more witnesses to a crime or major event, the
less likely somebody will help. Basically, everyone believes someone else will be the first to provide assistance. The same applies to society, especially
in the institution of politics. United States, a democratic society, allows all their citizens to vote. However, despite a system which enables the citizen to
be independent, ironically it may sometimes encourage conformity. Both Henry David Thoreau, famous for his discussions on a subject that is a title of
his essay Civil Disobedience and Machiavelli, author of The Qualities of the Prince, notice a pattern of conformity in society. When a major voting
decision is not supported by a majority, people will often wait rather than advertise and fruitfully support their cause. Believing that their cause can
only succeed if the majority is supportive, they wait until their chance is best to propose change. Machiavelli takes note of this behavior and writes a
"manifesto" for a would–be prince to remain in charge and popular within the society. Thoreau's speech about the factors leading to an

Analysis Of The Taker's Holocaust: Ishmael By Daniel Quinn
The Taker's Holocaust American author, Daniel Quinn in his novel, Ishmael, questions the path of humanity and the grim effects of the rise of man on
the surrounding world by analyzing the extent of damage that has been caused by mankind conquering the community of life and not participating as
an equal. He utilizes irony and allusions through the beginning till the end of his novel to illuminate to the readers that when mother culture ceases to
be heard, inspiration will be present for the takers to stop enacting a story in which captives of a civilizational system in which the world was
conquered and destroyed for the takers to live exempted from the community of life. Quinn begins his novel by examining the inherent irony of the
creation myth and alluding to the event which inspired humans to adopt their story and hold it commonplace within their hearts. Quinn, through the
the dialogue shared between the pupil and Ishmael when they candidly discussed the origin of man, uses a great sense of situational irony to capture
his readers when dissecting the Taker's myth: "'Everyone in your culture knows this... Man is the climax of the whole cosmic drama of creation.' 'Yes.'
...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Did the entire cosmic process of creation come to an end three million years ago, right here on little planet with the appearance of man? ... 'Did
evolution come to a screeching halt just because man had arrived?' 'No, of course not'" (Quinn,

Cultural Primitivism in William Faulkner's "The Bear" Essay
Cultural Primitivism in William Faulkner's "The Bear"
Author(s): Kenneth LaBudde
Source: American Quarterly, Vol. 2, No. 4 (Winter, 1950), pp. 322
–328
Published by: The Johns Hopkins University Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3031223 .
Accessed: 11/11/2013 07:10
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies
/terms.jsp .
JSTOR is a not–for–profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital
archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
When Ike comes close to him,Old Ben takes on the stance of a human being.When Ike rescuedthe ratter,Old Ben "loomed and toweredover himlike a
thunderclap." the accountof the closing
In
in on the bear we are told that "it caught the dog in both arms, almostloverlike, and theyboth went down." A momentlater after
Boon jumped astrideOld Ben "the bear surgederect,raisingwith the man and dog too,and turnedand stillcarrying man and the the dog it took two or
threesteps towardthe woods on its hind feetas a man wouldhave walked
Primitive
people observedthe sagaciousqualities,the omnivorous habits,and the wide range of facial and bodilyexpression emoof tional behaviorin the bear.
They were struckby seeing the bear rise on his hind legs and sit up against a tree just as if he were a man. The fact that a bear, unlikeotheranimals,walks
on the sole of his foot with the heel touchingthe groundand leaves a footprintof heel,toe, and arch like that of a human being had a great impacton the
mind of primitive man. Perhaps these unique qualities help explain the importance
Old Ben had forFaulkner's char'Bear Ceremonialismin the Northern Hemisphere (Philadelphia, 1926) 184. Unless

Thoreau's Essay On Government
Thoreau begins his essay stating "That government is best which governs not at all". It keeps its strength, but loses its integrity over time. Governments
force themselves onto men and sometimes themselves for their own benefit. People have accomplished much on their own and would have done more
if it weren't for the government. It is an immoral means to an end that does not keep the county free. Trade and commerce would never be able to
avoid what legislators throw at them. Thoreau requests a better government. If the people are the ones with power, the majority are the ones who will
rule. There would be no justice in a government where the majority rule.why does a man have a conscience if it is to be resigned to lawmakers?
Thoreau's only

Analysis Of Going Native By Abigail Solomon Godeau
The violent clash of patriarchal Europe with the Americas and other parts of the world during the colonial period directly caused a degree of cross
cultural diffusion that is evident within art. During this period of immense change, european artists sought to innovate and take a modern approach to
their work, breaking away from the established mold. Abigail Solomon–Godeau write of one such artist from this period, Paul Gauguin, not only for his
experimentation into expressionism but for the relation to which he viewed the native people of Tahiti, regarding them from a primitivist lens,
appropriating much of their culture, and the sexualization of women.
Going Native by Abigail Solomon–Godeau deals primarily with Paul Gauguin, a late nineteenth century artist generally known for pioneering the
expressionist movement, and the extent to which his works, both conceptually and literally, fetishize the indigenous peoples of Tahiti. One excerpt in
particular that clearly expresses this notion would be Solomon–Godeau's reference to La Jeune Nee by Helene Cixous, in which she [Cixous] states
"the body of strangeness must not disappear, but its strength must be tamed, it must be returned to the master"; through this line, the parallel that
Solomon–Godeau establishes becomes quite apparent, that there exists a commonality between Gauguin's perception as well as the characteristic form
in which women and natives were depicted during the time period. Solomon–Godeau goes on to explain

Paul Gauguin And Henri Matisse
"Primitivism" was a cultural attitude that arose in Europe during the late 19th and 20th century in opposition to the increasingly decadent and
materialistic European culture. Rather than an artistic movement, "primitivism" is a European conception of foreign civilizations and lands as
"simple", less developed, and naive. This is an important distinction to make, because "primitivism" was defined in the eyes of the Europeans who saw
foreign civilizations as unsophisticated, indicating that the concept of "primitivism" is heavily biased in the view of the Europeans. Paul Gauguin and
Henri Matisse were two artists that were highly influenced by the concept of "primitivism," and some similarity can be depicted in their works such as
the use of female nudes, vivid colors, and artistic techniques. However, their definition and methods of achieving "primitivism" differ heavily, due to
the fact that the vagueness of "primitivism" allows it to be a self–defined concept. These similarities and differences can be seen through the two works
of art The Spirit of the Dead Watching by Paul Gauguin, and The Blue Nude by Henri Matisse, and the way they depict women in each of the pieces.
The first important similarity between the two pieces is the obvious use of the reclining female nude. The female figure was a popular subject matter
for the primitivists of this time, because society viewed women to be more "natural" than men, who were more "civilized." Society assumed that
women's

Ishmael Character Analysis
Daniel Quinn is the author that wrote the 1992 book, Ishmael, An Adventure of the Mind and Spirit. His book is quite interesting and thought
provoking, as it eludes to many bigger lessons about how life is the way it is. In one of these lessons, he makes the assumption that "Takers", or
people who killed and ruined "Leaver" cultures, are at the heart of many global problems. He does this through the character Ishmael, who is a gorilla
that somehow has the capability to telepathically communicate thoughts. Throughout most of the book, Ishmael and a character who is supposed to
symbolize the reader, criticize the actions of Takers, and shame the people of this category. However, what Ishmael fails to realize is that not all sides
of the argument... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Both define the relationship between thinking and being. Still, each see the world in a way that is important for development, growth, and expansion.
Instead, if we think about ourselves as a process, than no version of our self is better than another. Sensory information is meaningless, it's what we do
with the information that matters. The Takers are people who make value of this information– they adapt. If the terms, idealists and materialists were
replaced with the terms "Takers" and "Leavers", their definitions would remain true. Meaning, Takers already fit attributes of Idealists and Leavers
fit the mold of a materialists. Neither of them is correct or incorrect, they just both do things a little differently. Which means that there is no true
solidarity of what a "Taker" and a "Leaver" is since those two terms are useless, there is only human and subgroups of types of human thinkers and
doers. According to metaphysic definitions, people don't actually see things for what they really are, a person can't, so these types of labels Ishmael
creates are essentially pointless. The brain changes things because it has been previously rewired based off of survival. So we all technically have
characteristics of whatever Ishmael considers to be a

The Human Killer : The Characteristics Of A Serial Killer
For many years, psychologists have studied the difference between nature versus nurture and why people have the personality traits that they do. A
common study on this topic is usually on identical twins. This is because these twins have the exact same DNA. Within these studies, the scientists
learn that traits come from both heritable characteristics and from their environment. In 2000, a professor at the University of Wisconsin preformed
a study on the brain scans of five hundred people, in which half of the people were considered prone to violence. The study found that the brain
images of those who had been convicted of a murder with aggressive or antisocial disorders showed distinct brain activity compared to those who
were considered normal (Serial Killers: Nature vs. Nurture, n.d.). In cases with serial killers or with people related to violence, the studies tend to show
that their personality and desire to kill come from mainly there DNA and nature, rather than their past. The Unabomber contradicts these stereotypes of a
serial killer through the influence of his past and his motives for his bombs. Because of his family's standards, Theodore Kaczynski resulted in
becoming an outsider to his peers. Ted grew up in the time period around World War II, which influenced many of his family's beliefs. Due to the many
bombings during this time, a fear of technology spread through their community. Since age five, Ted was aware of his unusual intellectual family. On
many

Other Scenarios of Roderick NashВґs Essay Island Civiliation
"It is a vision, a dream, if you prefer, like Martin Luther King's, and it means clustering on a planetary scale." (Nash) In Historian Roderick Nash's
essay entitled "Island Civilization: A vision for Human Occupancy of Earth in the Fourth Millennium," Nash not only proposes the ideology of Island
Civilization but also challenges readers to be informed of the rights of nature. Gaining insight on the options of preservation and nature from
masterminds like John Muir, Henry David Thoreau, and Wallace Stegner. Nash devises a plan of action for Earth during the fourth millennium.
Realizing the illustrate of our worlds "wilderness" Nash educates on the ways in which the natural world will evolve one thousand years from now. In
the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
As other studies have shown, humans cannot go for more than 10 minuets without using technology. To remove ourselves of all the advanced
technology on our age, should simply not happen. Most people would probably not comply with the guidelines of the future primitive. Nash's final
and perhaps most far fetched idea is "Island Civilization." He explains taking human civilization away from the large majority of land and
containing it into small portions of land, thus removing our presence from the majority of the planets soil to preserve e the wilderness. Nash's ideas
of air cities and underwater cities seem almost impossible. What really seems impossible is that Earth has about 7.2 billion people, and is rapidly
growing. Somehow decreasing the birthrate with Nash's idea, "Limiting (either politically and ethically or biologically with a chip implanted at birth)
every woman to the use of one egg for reproduction would in a century bring things back into the balance that Island Civilization demands." Nash
fantasizes about the ideas of no war, no border disputes, and the return of great creatures such as matadors and saber–toothed tigers. One look at human
history reveals that our very nature is to expand and desire more for ourselves, than extinct creatures have appropriately earned the title of extinct. "Of
course a change like this one involves compromises with human

Could Anarchy Work? Essay
There it is, the "A" word; Anarchy. The word that may frighten some or the word would make some think it's just mindless chaos and destruction. In
this paper I will provide some information on Anarchy. Anarchy has multiple definitions by many dictionaries. Anarchy, according to the Webster
dictionary's definitions, means: A. absence of government. B a state of lawlessness or political disorder due to absence of government authIrity. C. a
utopian society of individuals who enjoy complete freedom without government. The opinion of whether anarchy could work or not is lead up to
what a person thinks of it. Is it a state of disorder like definition B states? Is it just a neutral absence of government like definition A says? Or is it a
utopian... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
–Communist (the form of anarchy Jared Smith is hell–bent on saying is ideal.) would get rid of money, private property, and markets. Everyone would
be completely equal. –Syndicalism is the idea of no class systems and that everything would be traded from person to person. Anarcho–Pacifism:
–Completely removes the idea of violence. –Would follow closely to the ideas of Gandhi. Symbol of Anarcho–Pacifism. Religious: –Typically,
Religious Anarchists would stick to their religion's teaching and follow them. –Many are doubtful this would work because of the idea of answering to
authorities in the various religons. Green: –Green Anarchy has 2 categories: Naturism and Primitivism. –Has its focus on the environment. –Naturism
tries to separate from the normal world; there are even "eco–villages" –Naturists are often nudists and vegetarian. –Primitivism believes we should go
back to the unindustrialized ways of life and basically live as we did during the hunter–gatherer stage of humanity. Philosophical: –Philosophical
Anarchists believe in following what one believes to be a moral way of life and that we do not need to follow the commands and laws of the
government because they lack ethical authority. –Some believe that a minimal state would be necessary but as little as possible. Others refuse this idea
because of the

The Better Angels Of Our Nature
Today, in a social media ridden world where there's no communication gap, allows news from around the world to be delivered to us in matter of
seconds. Almost every day we hear about a shocking act of violence, whether it's a terrorist bombing, a senseless rape or a gruesome murder. These
tragedies makes us wonder, "What is the world coming to?" However, we forget to realize that in fact today's world is much more peaceful
compared to how dangerous life was thousands of years ago. As pinker stated, "Brutality was once woven into the fabric of daily existence" (2).
Therefore, in order to understand the violence we witness today, it's important to acknowledge how bad the world was in the past. In this paper, just as
pinker did in his book "The Better Angels of our Nature", I will also argue that violence has decreased tremendously over the centuries by using
numerous evidence and statistical data. The Pacification process, Civilizing process, and other sanctions throughout millenniums are just some of the
changes that resulted in the decline of violence throughout history.
In his book "The Better Angels of our Nature", Pinker uses works from Homeric Greece, evidence from The Old Testament, andearly modern Europe
to support his claim that after a millennia of bloody violence, human kind is entering a peaceful existence. In order allow readers to understand the
violence we witness today, Pinker begins by examining the origins of violence; He uses Chimpanzees who has the traits

Daniel Quinn's Ishmael
In his novel Ishmael, Daniel Quinn discusses the destruction and salvation of the world. By way of a newspaper ad, an unnamed narrator meets a
telepathic gorilla, named Ishmael, who had put up the ad to find a pupil with a desire to save the world. Spurred by his benefactor's obsession with
Nazi Germany, Ishmael imparts on the narrator what he knows best: captivity (Quinn 24). Ishmael claims humans of what are considered civilized
cultures are captives of a story that keeps the world captive. This large group, Ishmael calls "Takers," while everyone else–usually hunter–gatherers of
"primitive" cultures–Ishmael calls "Leavers" (Quinn 39). In order to save the world, Ishmael believes Takers need to be freed from the story they are ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Although it could be argued that they were Leavers by not exterminating their competition, they could have instead been hunter–gatherer Takers
believing all large mammals were something to be conquered and owned as agricultural Takers view the soil of the world.
Despite this romanticization of the hunter–gatherer lifestyle, however, Ishmael isn't urging people to become hunter–gatherers to save the world.
Ishmael says settlement–and, by extent, agriculture–is a biological adaptation, which can compete with other adaptations and, thus, is "subject to the
laws of competition" (Quinn 135). If hunter–gatherer Takers can exist, agricultural Leavers could too, or as Ishmael bluntly puts it, "The Leaver
lifestyle isn't about hunting and gathering, it's about letting the rest of the community live" (Quinn 250). As Leaver groups typically find a lifestyle
that suits them, Takers could invent a new lifestyle to avoid the destruction of the world.
As societies of today become more aware of their impact on the world, I feel we begin to work towards belonging to the world rather than ruling the
world–we become less self–centered. There are individuals beside Daniel Quinn who warn about the destruction of the world. In 2007, Al Gore and
others won the Nobel Peace Prize for "their efforts to bring the impending environmental, social, and political catastrophes of global warming to the
public's attention"

Hunter-Gatherers
Observing the past through our modern lens makes it near impossible to objectively judge the decisions of our ancient ancestors. Hindsight bias plays a
large role in clouding our ability to see what may have been. Was adopting agriculture a successful decision? Would humans have been better off
remaining hunter–gatherers? Both arguments have valid points. However, the more time I spend pondering these questions, the greater I start to lean
towards the former. Before delving too deep, it's best to look at the foundation of this entire premises; yes, hunter gatherers lived more comfortable and
heathier lives than ancient farmers, but was their lifestyle truly better? After all, humans have been hunter–gatherers for much of our existence.... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
However, even if they had the time, the nomadic lifestyle of hunter–gatherers severely limited their abilities. Because early humans were able to
permanently reside at a single location, they were able to create tools that would have been impossible to move around nomadically. Such tools were
used to improve techniques and create more advanced tools. Take metalworking for example, the production of iron and bronze requires a capable
furnace, something that is extremely difficult to haul from location to location. Without iron we would have never developed steel. Without both of
these the industrial revolution would not have been possible, and without the industrial revolution modern levels of technology wouldn't exist. Arguing
that our lives are better off without these technologies seems shortsighted. Yes, these technologies have negatives, which I plan on further addressing,
but it's also important to look at the good. Even if you live in a developing country today, much of the world has access to better medical technology
than a hunter–gatherer could have ever dreamed of. Diseases and injuries that would have devastated hunter–gatherers are now treatable. How can we
say that such a lifestyle would be better when many would never get a chance to live

Shays Rebellion Dbq
Since when is fighting for what you believe in a bad thing? To summarize, Shays' rebellion was caused because taxes were raised by 1000%, the
farmers were jailed since they couldn't pay, and 1,500 farmers stole weapons in which 4 were killed by local militia during the process. Although many
people believe that the Shays' supporters were rebels, nevertheless they were freedom fighters because they were fighting for their rights, being
unlawfully punished, and the police were abusing their power.
To begin, the farmers were fighting for their rights. According to Document C, "what country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned
from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance?" (Jefferson). Thomas Jefferson explained that it is normal for people to protest if
they think something is wrong. In this case, the farmers didn't like that they were being punished because they couldn't afford to pay the high taxes, so
they started speaking up. But instead of pacifying the farmers, they were being ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Document A says "The Riot Act gives unlimited power to justices of the peace, sheriffs, Deputy
–Sheriffs, and police officers and makes it impossible to
bring them to court. Yet their actions may be motivated by revenge hatred, and envy." (Gray) In other words, the law enforcement could do whatever
they wanted and not be punished. This kind of power was easily abused to meet the personal interest of an officer and could've been used to make
unfair choices.
The supporters of Shays' Rebellion were doing what was right and letting the government know that they didn't like the immensely high taxes that were
in place. They fought for their rights, were illegitimately jailed, and the law enforcement misused their authority. Even if the odds were against them,
the farmers still took action and protested. These signs of bravery and courage show that the protesters were not rebels, but freedom

Heart Of Darkness : Primitivism Vs Civilization
Heart Of Darkness: Primitivism VS Civilization; as seen by Joesph Conrad As a piece of post–colonialism text, Joesph Conrad's Heart of Darkness
provides an insight on the difference between primitivism and civilization, as seen by the author. Three main symbols help solidify the book's point
that the difference between civilization and primitivism isn't just black and white, and that the "gray area" exists within ourselves. These symbols
being the comparison of Brussels to "whited sepulchers", the Fog, and the Ivory itself. In Heart of Darkness, it can be inferred that the Native Africans
are supposed to represent the primitive savages and the white Europeans are supposed to represent the civilized men. However, what we hear from
Marlow's tale is that the white Europeans were the ones acting like savages, whereas the "savages", such as the cannibals, acted more respectable,
even though these cannibals were exactly that: cannibals who ate human flesh. However, Marlow was surprised to find that they were able to
control their urges aboard the ship and seemed to operate on a code. He will eventually realize the darkness that exists within all man. The first part
of this book is being told from the perspective of not only Marlow telling his tales to the crew, but also by the reactions of the crew. The tale is told in
first–person plural; describing what the four members of Marlow's audience thinks and feels about his story. This unanimity and anonymity with the
reactions

Reacting To An Unfair Government In Henry David Thoreau's...
Reacting to an Unfair Government Without a job, without a source of income, without a way to provide oneself with the necessities, how would one
survive in life? It is stated in Henry David Thoreau's essay, "Resistance to Civil Government," that the reaction to an unfair government is to remove
oneself from office if the government violates the moral human law and rebel/revolutionize against the government. This is clear in the following
quote, "All machines have their friction; ...But when the friction comes to have its machine, and oppression and robbery are organized, I say, let us
not have such a machine any longer. In other words, when ...a nation which has undertaken to be the refuge of liberty are slaves, and a whole country
is unjustly overrun and conquered by a foreign army, ..., I think that it is not too soon for honest men to rebel and revolutionize." However, rebelling
could result in losing a government position which is leaving an occupation and that leads to serious consequences for the person involved. This
thought stemmed from Thoreau after he was jailed for not paying taxes to the state. Thoreau did not support the Mexican–American war and disliked
the fact that the government supported slavery. Since he broke the law, he was forced to stay overnight in jail. Thoreau believed if the law violated the
human conscience, then one should follow his conscience over the law. "Why has every man a conscience, then? I think that we should be men

Henry David Thoreau And The Role Of Government Essay
Miguel, Cruz
Melissa, Carr
LIT 2020
17 May 2016
Thoreau and the Role of Government
America has always been a supposedly democratic country, where all men were considered to be equal. This idea was put forth by the Declaration of
Independence and other founding documents, and can be seen idealized in the poems of Walt Whitman and the writings of other American authors of
the 19th century. However, the government's focus on equality and civic engagement was not always carried out faithfully. In his essay "Civil
Disobedience," Henry David Thoreau contends that people ought not to allow governments to overrule their hearts, and argues that they have an
obligation to empower the proper rule of a country instead of quietly surrendering to unjust practices.
The country of the United States of America was founded in response to the unfair government of King George II, whose English parliament, and the
governors and authorities who represented him in the colonies, created and enforced policies which benefited themselves while damaging the
livelihoods and the lifestyles of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This is similar to the motives of the writers of the Declaration, who took strong action to create their ideal form of government. Thoreau develops the
theme of the individual's civic responsibility to stand up to bad government throughout his essay, and he points to the existence of slavery and the
Mexican–American war (389), among other things, as examples of how bad the American government has become. After describing his own small
act of rebellion by refusing to pay poll tax and being put in jail for it (402), Thoreau argues that it is only by being "free" in thought and imagination
(410), and by "the seasonable experience and effectual complaints of the people" (412) that American government can achieve

You Mean Anarchism IsnвЂ™t All About Chaos? Essay
You Mean Anarchism Isn't All About Chaos? Social activist Lucy Parsons once said, "Anarchism has but one infallible, unchangeable motto,
"Freedom." Freedom to discover any truth, freedom to develop, to live naturally and fully." Anarchism then, is being able to live and not be ruled by
a government, but instead to live by one's own means in order to increase the good for oneself and others who share the common belief. Human
beings are capable of making the decisions. Instead of being ruled by one, anarchists live by agreement on decisions that will work for everyone. Like
anarchism, conservatism, liberalism, and libertarianism, have different views as to how one should be governed or ruled. Conservatism is the belief that
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
One should not base their relationships off of what a church or law says, one should do what they feel is right. Why should others have a right to
choose whether you can be with someone you love or not? It is an unjust way to treat others who love the exact same way that everyone else does.
What some people don't understand is that not everyone is alike. We all have different tastes in clothing, music, or books, but also whom we date.
Unlike the other stances, anarchism includes the belief that one should be in whatever kind of relationship they choose to be in and that it should not
be limited or restricted by "higher power" or what is said to be morally correct. In her essay, Highleyman states, "Anarchists generally want to get
government out of the business of approving personal relationships, rather than extending such approval to same–sex relationships" (9). Through this
she says that rather than waiting for the government to pass laws that say its okay to marry if you are gay, anarchists would rather have the government
just mind their own business and not worry about a man marrying a man or a woman marrying another woman. Therefore, anarchy creates a better
society through acceptance and not tolerance. Much like the progression of same–sex marriage acceptance, technological advancements have also
dramatically increased within a small period of time. According to anarchistic belief, not all

Life of Simplicity
James A Life of Simplicity We are always taught while growing up that we must always aim for the stars, that life can always get better, if and only
if you aim big. We are taught that a great life can only be achieved through material and monetary means. That your self worth is only equal to what
you own. The aim of society is no longer to be free and live a life of comfort but to be a part of the bigger picture and feed the machine. Henry David
Thoreau expresses his concern on these issues in detail in his works Walden and "Civil Disobedience". Life should be led with simplicity. This is
Thoreau's mantra as he began his two–year experience of minimalist living. Thoreau is explicit that life should not be so difficult and so ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
As the protests grew so did the action against them. The local police were given riot gear and threw tear gas in the streets. Reporters were arrested
when they tried to report on this issue. Tanks were eventually brought in and the officers removed they're name badges in a final act of separating
themselves from their actions. This is not a government that is protecting the people or keeping them free but keeping them in line. As Thoreau
said, " [The Government] does not keep the country free. It does not settle the West. It does not educate. The character inherent in the American
people has done all that has been accomplished, and it would have one somewhat more, if the government had not sometimes got in its way." The
beginning of this passage really nails the issue with part of America's government currently. It is not about freedom or educating as the passage
states later. If it were about either of those others would not berate us for questioning the government's moves. If it were about freedom would
have more access to certain things that are considered to be a luxury. We would be able to do what we wanted (within reason) if that were true.
The ideas of a simple life and a government that actually serves the people are two of Henry David Thoreau's largest issues. He wrote extensively on
how he lived a truly simple life and how rewarding it was. He lead a life to be somewhat envied. How many of us could just give up everything we
have now and just

##ticism And Primitivism In William Faulkner's The Bear
While studying in Africa, ecologist and geographer Jared Diamond raised the question, "why does the white man have so much cargo?" Cargo, in this
sense simply refers to property, wealth, and anything else that a man may seek to accumulate in his lifetime. While it may not seem apparent, William
Faulkner seeks to answer a similar question in his novel The Bear. The question is complex, and the answer is not easy, but what is consistent between
both of these two great mind's theories is that everything in nature roots back to Primitivism, specifically anarcho–primitivism. Faulkner uses his novel
to define Primitivism in his own way, while also delivering a captivating while meaningful story and leading the reader to question the norms of a
changing society. Throughout the novel, Isaac, the protagonist, seems to have something different about him, something that connects him to the
world more than most people. He understands animals, the wilderness, people, and eventually the value of human life. Isaac's progression through the
story is fundamentally based up his inclination to exhibit primitive instincts, not in the sense of Neanderthals, but in thee sense of respecting where he
came from, and what he owes to the world. Faulkner ends the story by making sure that Isaac has become fully aware of his purpose on earth, his role
in the world, and the fundamentals of Primitivism. He realizes that he comes from a dark past, sinful ancestors, and a period of great change, and that

The BrпїЅcke Studios : A Testing Ground For Primitivism...
Lloyd's chapter, "The BrГјcke Studios: A Testing Ground for Primitivism", in her book, German Expressionism: Primitivism and Modernity, discusses
the influence of Primitivism artefacts used as decorative items and their cultural influence on the studios of the die BrГјcke movement. Lloyd asserts in
her writings, that the work of the die BrГјcke were inspired by the primitivizing, bohemian interior design fashioned by the artists inside their individual
studios. The non–European art that attracted the BrГјcke artists' attention first of all–the Palau beams and Ajanta temple paintings–were in both cases
related to decorative environments, and thus relevant for their own studio spaces, rather than random or arbitrary stylistic models . Shortly thereafter,
Lloyd contradicts her earlier statements when she states the studios in the Friederichstadt neighborhood of Dresden that the BrГјcke artists' shared
were in a working–class neighborhood, agreeing with other art historians' claims that the reason it was chosen was because it appealed to their
anti–bourgeois sensibilities. Further reading exposes what I believe Lloyd was really trying to tell her audience, although the BrГјcke artists were
antibourgeois, they were decorating their studios in a bourgeois, bohemian style to give their work, of how they thought, a worldly, and thusly, a more
educated artist would decorate their atelier. Lloyd supports this when she supports Bleyl as he describes Kirchner's studio in the fall of 1907. Bleyl's
memoirs, although not completely reliable with regard to dating, support this theory as he suggests that there were no decorations in Kirchner's atelier
when he left die BrГјcke in the autumn of 1907, but that when they met again the was decorated in a very bohemian style. Lloyd shares with us that
although these BrГјcke artists were using Primitivism to influence their style, the underlying factor was because it was what they were currently
exposed to with the rest of the population during the German colonization of Africa. Lloyd explains they were almost unwitting imposters as they were
not well–educated, having never traveled farther than Dresden or Berlin. Her comments about Kirchner supports his antibourgeois attitudes, but his

Henry David Thoreau And John Steinbeck's The Grapes Of Wrath
The government when functioning correctly and properly, can achieve great things. But the definition of a properly functioning government is highly
debated and pitted against many theories and concepts. Two of these ideas are discussed by Henry David Thoreau and John Steinbeck. John Steinbeck,
in his novel 'The Grapes of Wrath,' discusses several themes of family,government, and the community. Thoreau examines the role of the government
and the individual and how they are related, yet separate. These two pioneers share many of the same ideas and understandings. Steinbeck and Thoreau
both address the concept of self–government, injustice, and the basis of constitutions. One prominent aspect of Thoreau's essay and Chapter 17 in
'Grapes ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The migrant families in the camp form their own government and thus, their own laws and constitutions. The laws are quite varied but, include
many factors of society. The leaders of these societies come up with the basic rights of the individual, family, and community. These rights led to
rules because to maintain rights, there are rules to be kept. "And as the [migrants] moved westward, rules became laws" and they found a basis of
their constitution (Steinbeck 131). Thoreau believes that "unjust laws exist" especially when the government creates them (Thoreau 6). They are
ostensibly going to be unjust if the government creates them because the government officials do not take into account the wishes of the people.
Some may argue that the people's needs in laws can be detrimental but Thoreau, and Steinbeck, argue that this is critical, if not completely necessary,
for better rights and laws. Moreover, the migrants seemed to have worked out their rules and their "worlds improved so that the people could be safe
in their worlds; and the form was so fixed that a family acting in the rules knew it was safe in the rules" (Steinbeck 132). They appear to be in a better
place than when they were stuck without anywhere to go. Thus, if rules and constitutions were to include the needs and necessities of a community,
they would not be considered

Examples Of Primitivism In Savage Acts
"Primitivism: belief in the superiority of nonindustrial society to that of the present" –Webster dictionary. Is it simply a harmless first thought that
when thinking of a culture deemed "less than" or is it a dangerous forethought that has hand in the colonizing of peoples and cultures. Primitivism has a
long history that is intertwined with racism and prejudice. In the movie Savage Acts: Wars, Fairs, and Empires when America's President Mckinley
refused to acknowledge the Philippines as it's own independent republic because "the people were incapable of surviving alone". This thinking was
lead by the belief that because the Philippines was smaller and "less advanced" than America, that they needed to be possessed by a larger country
for their own good. The same President did the same thing in Hawai'i annexing their island for "their own good" despite the continuous objections
by the people. The thinking that these small and simple peoples needed to be saved and fixed or upgraded is an extremely dangerous mindset. In
this same film another act of racial primitivism is shown when addressing the 1893 World's Fair where it showed a series of racial/cultural groups
through the lens primitivism. It showed people as extremely simple, wearing minimalist clothing, and through the stereotypes of white perspective and
when black and indigenous americans tried to speak up and decide what they wanted to show the world they were shut down. Leaving only the one
sided view of people of

The Pros And Cons Of Democracy In Cyberspace
One can appreciate the modern technology and how it simplified life, but fail to use it to the full extent. Throughout these past decades, technology has
brought both advantages and disadvantages to the humankind. One of the disadvantages deals with government involvement, giving them the access to
information and the power to make sure they have everything under control which leaves its users with limitation and undemocratic. The good news is
this situation only leads to certain measure leaving the users with freedom. Freedom giving people a chance to express themselves, even though they
fail to see the immunity they own. Democracy tends to be part of the technological system as well, most users use it to ensure democratization is all
around the world by including its part of communication. Democratization theory is that Cyberspace provides a various amount of internet sources for
people to access, whether it is to communicate or share moments with one another. "Democracy in Cyberspace: What Technology Can and Cannot Do
for Us," is a text written by Ian Bremmer, sharing evidence–based information sources that point out the real deal of internet and it's reflection towards
its users. One's experience of freedom is determined by the amount that is given to them, including their dependence on one another, as well as,
providing the chance to define technologist's neutrality. Advanced developments have occurred a lot throughout these years for the sake of technology.

An Exotic Forest By Henri Rousseau
Woman Walking in an Exotic Forest (1905), created by French artist, Henri Rousseau, is a painting that depicts a woman positioned in the center
foreground of the piece, fashioned in lightly coloured attire of the early 20th century. A vibrant forest surrounds the woman to make up the middle and
background of the painting, and consists of tall blue flowers, grasses, and trees that carry large orange fruit. Through this specific content, and the
stylistic elements of the piece, the painting comes to illustrate the challenges and turmoil of the transition to Modernity – the quality or condition of
being modern (OED,1). This thematic component reveals itself through the tension between the periods of Modernity and Classicism, as seen through
the central image of the woman, the painting's scale, and colour palette, along with, the inclusion of Primitive elements in the style, and subject used.
As such, this methodology, in the form, and technique of the piece, communicates a larger complexity. Where Modernity refers to the state of being
modern, Classicism contrasts this notion as a movement that attempts to harken back to aesthetics, and themes of the "classic" eras, so as to root itself
in the past (OED, 3). This piece represents classical elements through the inclusion of the woman. For instance, the woman poses in a structured manner
with a hand on the hip much like the classic positions reflected in ancient Greek, and Roman statues, to suggest a regiment of tradition.

The Han And Roman Attitudes Towards Technology
Han and Roman Attitudes Towards Advancement The Han and Roman worlds were two of the largest and most complex early empires composed of
different cultures, political systems, languages, beliefs, and ways of living. However, they had a few similarities; one of which is the introduction of
various technologies during the first and second millennium. The Han in China and Romans in the Mediterranean experienced a time period of
expansion in which they began to develop technology such as metallurgy and water systems to aid in military conquests and practical purposes.
Although both Han and Roman had definite appreciation towards technology, the Han attitude towards technology was more glorifying in its
effectiveness and utility; while the roman attitude was less glorifying as they focused on technology to display their civilizations advancements, while
they neglected to glorify those who worked with tools. Han's attitude towards technology was appreciative, glorified technology when its is supported
by the government, and believed technology is essential for the empire. The Roman attitude includes inferiority of tools, aestheticism as main use of
technology, and less glorification and importance on technology. Hans appreciation towards technology is depicted in their usage to improve society by
making it run more efficiently. For instance, In document 3 & 4 the authors, both scholar and government official, convey the benefits of the mortar
and pestle; and water powered

Ishtar Gate Mosaics
Artist: Unknown Civilization: Babylonian Title: Ishtar Gate mosaics Walking through the Ishtar Gate with mosaics full of dangerous wild animals
that some people consider to be beasts will create fear, terror for me. Though, humans are considered to be the best prey and the most intelligent
creatures but, walking in between about 120 glazed bricks of wild animals, will make man feel inferior and scared of this animals. Since the Ishtar
gate is a pathway leading to a certain place, the purpose of these mosaics will be to give men walking through a greater sense of fear and powerless
of the place the Ishtar gate leads to. Artist: Unknown and Polykleitos Civilization: Greece and Roman Title: Anavysos Kouros and Spear bearer
(Doryphorous)... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Artist: Hironymus Bosech Civilization: Renaissance Title: Unknown 1)The Mouth House. This is a horrifying figure in the paint being from the fact
that in its mouth, humans are coming from it. To me, it looks like the men coming out from its mouth are escaping from the horrifying life they live
in. 2)The creature running after the sheep. Sheep symbolizes meekness and obedient. Between the Sheep and this scary creature is the Shepard who
is protecting the sheep from this wild beast. 3)The Owl .First of all, looking at any Owl is scary because of their big scary eyes, the Owl in this
painting eye is very large, and on top of the head, there is a rotten like substance on it which makes the Owl more scary Artist: Unknown Civilization:
Native Americans Title:

Primitivism Painting : 'Spirit Of The Dead Watching'
This art study will define the underlying principles of surrealism and female nudity that are found in the Primitivism painting entitled: "Spirit of the
Dead Watching" (1892) by Paul Gauguin and Wilfredo Lam's "Jungle (1944). Surrealism provides a psychoanalytical framework in which the mind
tends to repress the primal fears of the mind. The Freudian theory of the repression of the subconscious mind provides an example of the Primitivist
style Gauguin utilizes in the "spirit" painting, which defines the primal nudity of women that he releases through this depiction of a Tahitian woman,
named Teha'amana. This Tahitian woman, Gauguin's wife, is an example of a painting that releases the primal sexual instincts of the repressed mind,
yet it also defines the fears of the woman that lies in fear of the "spirit of the dead" that watches over her. Lam's depiction of four nude women in
"Jungle" also defines the pressed sexuality, which is released in this surrealist representation of the primal. Surrealism provides an analytical
framework in which Gauguin's depicts the primitive as a gateway to releasing his own desire to release sexual primitive desires through Teha'amana's
female identity. In essence, a historically–based surrealist/psychoanalytical examination of Primitivism will define the release of repressed sexuality in
Paul Gauguin's "Spirit of the Dead Watching" (1892) and Wilfredo Lam's "Jungle (1944). In a formal analysis, Gauguin's "Spirit of the Dead
Watching" is

Unjust Government
Raichal Chennemkara
UH ID: 1781323
When Protesting Against an Unjust Government Without a job, without a source of income, without a way to provide oneself with the necessities, how
would one survive in life? It is stated in Henry David Thoreau's book, "Resistance to Civil Government," that the appropriate reaction to an unjust
government is to remove oneself from office if the government violates the moral human law and rebel/revolutionize against that government. This is
clear in the following quote, "All machines have their friction; ...But when the friction comes to have its machine, and oppression and robbery are
organized, I say, let us not have such a machine any longer. In other words, when ...a nation which has undertaken to be the refuge of liberty are
slaves, and a whole country is unjustly overrun and conquered by a foreign army, ..., I think that it is not too soon for honest men to rebel and
revolutionize" (Thoreau 12). However, rebelling could result in losing a position occupation and leads to serious consequences for the person involved.
This thought stemmed from Thoreau after he was jailed for not paying taxes to the state. Thoreau did not support the Mexican–American war and
disliked the fact that the government supported slavery. Since he broke the law, he was forced to stay overnight in jail. Thoreau believed if the law
violated the human conscience, then one should follow his conscience over the law. "Why has every man a conscience,

Lord Of The Flies Decisions
In the novel Lord of the Flies by William Golding, young british boys are left stranded on an island, no way of escape other than hoping that a
passing ship will spy their smoke signal, after their plane crashed. At first they are ecstatic at the freedom of having no adults and relish the
opportunities they have on the island. Quickly, they realize that life on the island is not the all fun and games. The older kids, especially Ralph,
Jack and Piggy, make decisions and lead the way. The children form a group and implement a democracy with Ralph as leader, Piggy as advisor and
Jack as leader of the hunters. When Jack breaks off to create his own group with most of the older boys a deep divide forms. Ralph's group focusing on
being saved and... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
As proved in the last paragraph, the boys start of civilized they know what is right and wrong. It starts out with not taking responsibility for their
actions, the boys never say what they are doing is wrong and it needs to stop. When Robert is pretending to be the pig and gets hurt they all try to
make excuses and it escalates from there. Another small but important change is the hunters painting their faces. First, this allows them to catch pigs
which is the first step into killing and savage, Jack and Roger realize how much they enjoy asserting their dominance over other living beings and
causing pain. But it also allows them to become something else, cease to be civilized british boys and become savages, not having to own up for their
actions. A critical shift is when Jack dounces the rules, ""Bollocks to the rules! We're strong–we hunt! If there's a beast, we'll hunt it down!"(91). This
leads to all of the boys, expect Piggy and Ralph, dancing around, unable to be controlled by democracy or any form of government, out of control,
not doing violent acts, just out of control. One sad change is with Percival, as mentioned earlier he knew his whole name and address but when he
forgets his name at the end. Another vital shift is when Jack presents the group two choices, democracy, civilization, and rescue with Ralph or
savagery, chaos and hunting with Jack, none of the boys vote for Jack but follow him anyways. This illuminates that the boys know that following
Jack is bad and don't even tell Ralph that they are leaving but make a choice to leave anyways. This choice choses lack of accountability and chaos
over civilization. This represented by hunting versus keeping the fire. fire represents rescue and reaching a hand out to civilization, civilization is about
progress and fire was one of man's greatest inventions. While hunting is diving away from the

Henry David Thoreau's Resistance To Civil Government
Have you ever thought that the government had too much power, and didn't have the right people making the laws that everyone is expected to
abide by? There are many people, including myself, that feel like the leadership we have influencing us in government isn't quite up to par. Henry
David Thoreau was one of those people as well. Though Thoreau had different reasons for his belief than most do today, such as the war with Mexico
and slavery, his principles still stand strong in my opinion. In Resistance to Civil Government Thoreau starts off by telling us "That government is
best which governs least;" (945). During his writing he talks about how he doesn't feel that the government proves itself to be useful to the citizens. He
feels that the leaders of his states government have been elected because of majority and power, instead of their... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
Bankston's piece, "Thoreau's Case for Political Disengagement", both supports and disproves Thoreau's insight. He sees Thoreau's point of view,
and agrees with is way of peaceful protest. He even compares the works of Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr. to Thoreau, by establishing a
common ground in peacefulness and morality between them. On the other hand, however, he feels that the political quietism that Thoreau uses is
not strong enough or clearly justified. He expressibly makes his point with one statement during his essay; "As a member of a family and a
participant in a political order, my own conscience necessarily responds to the demands of my social position" (Bankston). For me, it is easy to see
where Bankston stands. He agrees that people should just not sit by and watch the government run the country into the ground, but he is also not
willing to make stand because it would be against the powerful majority. This concept is exactly what Thoreau was warning his readers about back
then, and it still appears to be heavily debated topic

Essay about Henry David Thoreau and the Patriot Act
Henry David Thoreau questioned how an unjust law should be handled, should it just be followed, should action be taken to fix the law while still
obeying it, or should it just be transgressed completely. The idea that one of these answers is correct is a fallacy, and a bad assumption. The
answer depends on the situation at hand. Any law that tramples on the rites of a person or a group of people is a law that should be ignored and
protested and actively broken. On the other hand a law that just lacks sense; is one that we could just live with or push to have fixed. The PATRIOT
Act is the perfect law to show how the lines of how to handle bad legislation easily blur. This is a law that allows the federal government to strip a
person... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
However, there are a handful of laws that are bad and make the choice of how to handle them clear. One such law is theConsumer Product Safety
Commission saying that the standards for product safety apply to resellers. This means if a person resells a toy containing lead paint, they are just as
liable as the company that originally sold the item and are subject to the same fine. This is a law that should just be ignored. Hopefully there aren't any
people brazen enough to push the issue, and try to get this enforced.
One thing Thoreau did not speak of directly but his question still covers are decisions government makes that aren't laws. When the government
gives billions of dollars to "bailout" a handful of people who have mismanaged their own funds; what do you do? It is not the whole population's
responsibility to take care of the few that can't seem to take care of themselves. This is another situation where the line gets blurry, there is no law to
break but the situation is perfect for being as loud as possible to make it clear that you do not approve. Government spending your money without
asking you how you feel about is just as much an injustice as anything else they may do. Weather it is a law that makes your day a little inconvenient,
an atrocity against the constitution, or the government making decisions without the consent of the people, care should be taken when determining
how to fix

On The Duty Of Civil Disobedience Rhetorical Analysis

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Cristina Franklin

More from Cristina Franklin (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

On The Duty Of Civil Disobedience Rhetorical Analysis