Mass Surveillance Pros Cons Debate

Mass Surveillance Pros And Cons
The Mass Surveillance Problems Mass surveillance has been a huge controversy between the
government and society. The government uses advanced technology to perform mass surveillance on
the citizens. In No Place To Hide, Glenn Greenwald told society about the National Security Agency
(NSA) using mass surveillance on Americans without warrants. He encourages people to recover
their privacy rights back. Edward Snowden is the person who disclosed the NSA's secret
surveillance activity to Glenn Greenwald. Edward felt that Americans need to know they're being
watched without their permission. Edward states this is why it should be exposed to the public, so
they may know what is going on in the administration. Glenn Greenwald also gives an
understanding ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Greenwald has told us "that the desire for privacy is shared by us all as an essential, not ancillary,
part of what it means to be human"(172). Based on my research in The Guardian, there is a
development in a surveillance called "Optic Nerve". It is the collaboration of Government
Communications Headquarters(GCHQ) and NSA to save abundance of Yahoo webcam user's
pictures. It is to determine whether it is a potential terrorism target or not. In a six month period, it
saved more than 1.8 million of Yahoo user's data. In addition, the program saved one picture every
five minutes. Optic Nerve method is GCHQ having a big chain in the Internet cable, and later
transferring data to the NSA. When The Guardian told Yahoo, Yahoo's reaction was very upset
because it was defined as a huge violation of privacy. In my view, if the two countries have a trade,
it is truly acceptable but if they do this for the sake of people's privacy it is not forgivable. Also, it is
disrespectful for them to get pictures of individual's conversations. The NSA should not conduct
anymore surveillance because it is against human's freedom. As I know, the new advance of mass
surveillance is able to monitor your webcam as well. This illustrates that although the webcam is
considered as online surveillance, but it also is determined as the direct surveillance due to people
having face–to–face video
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

The Pros And Cons Of Mass Surveillance
In early June 2013, the Guardian newspaper reported that the US National Security Agency (NSA)
was collecting the telephone records of tens of millions of American citizens (Greenwald 27).
Edward Snowden was the source of the report. He is a computer expert, who used to work for the
CIA of the United States, but was turned into a whistleblower and exposed the U.S. government's
secret surveillance programs. The leaks by him show that the NSA and British intelligence agencies
have had a consistently evolving set of tools and methods for gleaning information from hard to
reach systems. Prior to this event, most U.S. citizens had not known that their government agencies
had been surveilling their private data. Law enforcement and intelligence agencies have used
surveillance so that they can glean information, detect or prevent crime and terrorism, and
investigate them after they took place. Surveillance is defined as manipulating close observations of
an individual or a group. As technology like smart phones and social network services develops, the
vast amount of information about individuals and their opinions has become readily available in the
Internet and associated digital devices. Most of them are unencrypted and can be easily exposed to
prying eyes. The reason why mass surveillance becomes the center of the controversy is ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The experts insisted that French intelligence maintains a database of suspected individuals like
terrorists that has more than 11,000 names on it (Zetter, "After Paris Attacks, ..."). Tracking
individuals and analyzing data in an appropriate way to discover who poses the greatest threat are
more than what the security services can regulate. In other words, the remark seems to be a familiar
refrain that government agencies say after every terrorist attack to justify their privacy

Examples Of Mass Surveillance In 1984 By George Orwell
The subject of mass surveillance tends to cause controversy between people living in a formed
society. In the article, "A Surveillance Society" written by William E. Thompson and Joseph V.
Hickey, the authors tackle the subject of mass surveillance with a sort of give–and–take neutral
stance, utilizing the pages to distribute information rather than form a stance on the subject matter.
Immediately drawing the imagery and ideas of George Orwell's fictional novel "1984", the authors
quickly debunk the horrific dystopian future resulting from an oppressive government that uses
mass surveillance to watch everything everyone is doing by stating the obvious fact that we do not
live in this type of society. This is later combated by speculative suspicion

Mass Surveillance Of The NSA
Mass Surveillance
The NSA (National Security Agency) was established by order of President Truman. The decision
followed the development in breaking German and Japanese codes during WWII that contributed to
allied victories and successful missions. The NSA was a means of continuing code–breaking work
of the post–war era (The NSA 2016). Henceforth, the agency's focus has shifted from individual
suspicion to a large systematic practice of collecting mass data. Pressure to reduce fear of attacks
has led the federal government to increase surveillance to combat terrorism. In the last decade, it has
become increasingly normal for civil liberties to be eroded and government agencies to spy on
citizens to collect and store their personal information. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Apple publically declined because it could permanently weaken the privacy of law abiding citizens
worldwide and open the flood gates to access a technology that is used by billions of people. A week
later, it was admitted that the FBI had hacked the phone themselves. In fact, they lied about the need
for a back door (Apple 2016). The government wants an easy way to access data on devices with
secure encryption. Creating a master key or "back door" to access millions of phones is not the same
as searching a single home of an alleged terrorist or criminal. In essence it is a breach in privacy
with far reaching implications.
It is important to realize that wanting to keep certain parts of your life private does not mean you are
doing anything wrong. On the NSA's website it says "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing
to fear". This reasoning creates a climate of oppression. "By surveilling everyone, you catch the
benign breaches of law and taboo. If the public are all guilty, the executive part of the government
can selectively enforce laws, essentially giving them both judicial and legislative powers, which
defeats the point of separation of powers. In the fourth amendment, it

Pros And Cons Of Mass Surveillance
The purpose of this paper is to summarize two cons and two pro essays. This paper will cover the
different ideas about mass surveillance in the United States. Surveillance is when someone is being
closely observed. There are people who are against being watched and heard all the time. Others
believe that this action an be helpful for the American population. The individuals who disagree
with mass surveillance look at the aspect that this is a violation of their privacy and they observe the
cost of the technology needed. The group of people who are in favor of this action believe mass
surveillance can help prevent terrorism and crimes.
Throughout the years one started to hear more and more about the mass surveillance in the United
States. When people heard they were being watched they were unhappy. An example of this is seen
in the essay written by George Danezis and Bettina Wittneben named, "The Economics of Mass
Surveillance and the Questionable Value of Anonymous Communications." They state that their
examination on surveillance, "allowed them to draw interesting policy conclusions from published
interception figures, and get a better estimate of the amount of privacy invasion and the actual
volume of surveillance taking place." In other words their conclusion wasn't good. Their privacy
was getting invaded. They knew, "that if one member of a space is under surveillance all
relationships associated with that space become known to an observer." An example of this is

The House Of Lords Report On Surveillance, Privacy And The...
The house of lords report on surveillance, privacy and the constitution is mainly centered on the
subject of the government and high ranking officials storing mass amounts of data related to the
general public. One of the issues that it touches on is how easy it is for the UK to become a
"surveillance society". By this they mean the usage of CCTV and data storing getting so routine that
the government will know where everyone is at all times. This is a key concern for many people as
there are ethical issues associated with it and the idea that everyone should have the right to a certain
degree of privacy in their life.
The report also mentions various different events that have occurred in the 21st century in which a
device which stores huge amounts of personal date regarding members of the public, sometimes
even children, has been lost or stolen. The main reasoning behind the government proposals is war
against terrorism and the idea that if you have everyone's personal information and whereabouts it
will be far easier to prevent a terrorist attack or catch the perpetrator. However, there is a huge
opposition to these said proposals.
The report puts forward some questions about how mass surveillance is affecting our country, and
where to draw the line when it comes to watching our population. The main aim of this article is to
shed the light on how far the government is taking public surveillance so that people can know
exactly how private their lives are, and make a

A Report On The Snowden Leaks Essay
2.2 The Snowden Leaks
2.2.1 History
The government has a responsibility to protect its citizens from terrorism. Since 9/11, this threat has
been constantly growing and the government has taken steps to respond to this threat. The first of
these steps was to increase resources dedicated to identify and prosecute known and suspect
terrorists and would be terrorists to try and gain more information about possible attacks, and serve
justice to those guilty of terrorism. The next step was to restructure existing anti–terror organizations
(such as the FBI) and to develop new tools, mostly in the form of legislation, to help combat this
growing threat. However, while implementing these measures, the government also made efforts to
protect the rights and privacy of Americans
(https://www.justice.gov/archive/opa/pr/2008/September/08–nsd–807.html : Justice Department,
2008).
However, recent terrorist strikes such as the San Bernardino attack have been carried out following
the widespread availability of encrypted devices for consumers which makes it harder for the
government to collect information regarding these attacks from first hand evidence without support
from the companies involved in creating these products. This cooperation between the government
and the tech companies was undermined by the leak of documents detailing mass surveillance of
millions of people both inside and outside of America by the National Security Agency which led to
companies feeling "manhandled by

What Is Mass Surveillance?
What is mass surveillance? Mass surveillance is the collection of electronic data (e.g. e–mails or
phone call metadata) in bulk, which means the data is being collected from many people at once
instead of targeting individuals and performing surveillance on them. There are multiple methods
for performing mass surveillance, but the two that are generally used by the U.S. are "upstream
collection" and querying the data from telecom (communications) providers such as AT&T under
the USA Freedom Act; before the passage of the USA Freedom Act, the NSA (The National Security
Agency) would collect the metadata of phone calls itself, store them, and cross check them (under
Section 215 of the Patriot Act) with other intelligence information using "X–Keyscore" to make
connections related to individuals of interest; it can still do the same, but it must first request the
data from the provider using a secret warrant granted by the FISA, which is meant to be issued only
after a specific reason is given as traditional warrants would also require, but it grants the NSA a
renewal for a general warrant every 90 days that has and will continue to enable it to collect large
amounts of call metadata without giving specific reasoning; essentially, whereas before the NSA
would request, collect, and store information itself so that it could be queried later, it now queries
the information directly from the telecom providers. Upstream surveillance is the "collection of
communications on fiber

Mass Surveillance Ethics : Richard E. Morris
Mass Surveillance Ethics
Richard E. Morris
Excelsior College
Surveillance is, in the simplest terms, monitoring or observing an individual or group. Derived from
a French term meaning "looking upon," it includes not only visual observation but also behavior
analysis. Prominent examples of surveillance include cameras, wiretaps, GPS tracking, and packet
sniffing.
Observation is often seen as an expression of control. Just as being stared at for an extended period
can make you uneasy and even hostile, constant surveillance can have the same effect. Additionally,
surveillance is often conducted secretly and under the auspice of some authority.
The technological capabilities available in the present day take surveillance to unprecedented ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This state of affairs would continue until 1898, when Valdemar Poulsen introduced magnetic wire
recording with the invention of the telegraphone. During World War II, both the Allies and the Axis
used magnetic tape to conduct surveillance on their enemies, and on their own citizens. Prior to the
war, most legislation and court decisions had limited the ability of the United States government to
wiretap its own citizens. With the onset of hostilities, however, the issue of national security began
to weigh heavily on legislators. This use of domestic wiretapping was never dialed back, even
increasing during the Cold War era as the FBI monitored the communications of suspected
Communist sympathizers such as Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Now, as computers have become
seemingly ubiquitous and essential to our daily lives, the methods of computer surveillance become
increasingly diverse. Packet sniffers, keyloggers, and encryption backdoors are the most prevalent
tools in the most recent evolution of electronic surveillance.
The USA PATRIOT Act (Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools
Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism) was sweeping legislation enacted in the wake of the
terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. The Act increased the capability of law enforcement
agencies to combat terrorism by granting agencies the authority to

Essay On Real Cost Of Mass Surveillance
The Real Cost of Mass Surveillance
How would you feel if you knew you were being watched? How would you feel if every action you
took online was being observed? How would you feel if you were being surveilled as if you were a
criminal? Although mass surveillance is meant to find criminal activity and stop those responsible, it
has a much bigger impact on the lives of innocent people such as limiting free speech on the internet
through fear. Furthermore, it invades people's privacy and the power that mass surveillance gives the
government can be abused. On top of that achieves all of these negative effects at a very high price.
Anonymity on the internet encourages free speech. If that is taken away the government watches
everybody's actions, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The resources to surveil everyone online can not come cheap especially if the government has the
means to intercept phone calls. Lauren Razavi's article on the costs of mass surveillance shows that
the total cost would be estimated at £11.1billion over ten years. With sectors of the NHS being
privatised and poverty plaguing the UK that £11.1 billion could be used much more effectively and
compared to fixing those issues, mass surveillance is a waste of money. Also, if we are to spend this
much money on something, do we really want to spend it on having our rights taken away? The
downsides of mass surveillance are already enough to put people against mass surveillance but on
top of that the costs could raise even more issues.
The effectiveness of mass surveillance is also very questionable. If we want to make huge sacrifices,
then we should have a good reason for it. An article written by the New York times' Editorial board
shows how Paris was using surveillance. However even though those responsible for the Paris
attacks were being surveilled, the mass surveillance program failed to prevent the attacks from
happening. This raises big questions on if mass surveillance really works. If the government was
aware of the terrorists responsible for the attacks but did not act, then it is obvious that mass
surveillance is completely

Mass Surveillance and Its Role in Promoting National Security
Americans like to know things. With the most complex of information available with a simple
Google search and breaking news updates instantly accessible via smart phones, the United States
has adopted a culture that demands to know what is going on. That being said, it is no wonder
Americans were outranged upon discovering their government had been discreetly monitoring their
activity. The spark that ignited the controversy of mass surveillance initially arose in early 2013,
when former CIA {Central Intelligence Agency} and NSA {National Security Agency} employee
Edward Snowden "leaked information about the United States government's highly classified mass
surveillance programs" to journalists from several major publications, including the Washington
Post and the Guardian (Edward Snowden).
The result was an uproar of accusations aimed at the executive branch and the NSA, declaring these
data sweeps "unconstitutional" and "useless" (End The Phone Data Sweeps) because of their
supposed invasion of privacy and lack of pertinent results. Despite these claims, it is clear that the
protection of national security is undoubtedly worth the sacrifice of personal privacy by the people
of the Untied States.
Because all US citizens are protected by the Constitution, many have turned to the authority of the
Bill of Rights in attempt to prove data sweeps unconstitutional. But can Amendment IV really be
used as evidence in a case against mass surveillance? Not particularly. The

Argumentative Essay On Mass Surveillance
Imagine a country that applies surveillance tools to monitor its citizens' daily activities, including
what they are doing, where they are visiting, and who they are contacting. Probably no one would
like to stay in such place where their privacy is intruded by those in power. However, for Americans,
their privacy confronts growing threats from the government's mass surveillance that is often
justified in the name of homeland security. The issue flared when Apple rejected the FBI's order to
create a hacking software to unlimitedly crack the iPhone from a killer who attacked at the Inland
Regional Center in San Bernardino, California on December 2, 2015. The powerful encryption
software the government required Apple to craft is a master key that could be used to open not only
one iPhone but every ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Although Apple has not created such tool, the development of technology in the modern society has
already expanded the government's ability to profile any given person under surveillance by
gathering and analyzing his/her private data. The severe consequence of mass surveillance is that
many innocent individuals have been wrongfully profiled and interrogated. Once their private
information is gathered by the government, it can be shared and used widely for unstated purpose
without the public knowing. Although government's surveillant activities, in many cases, keep
civilians' lives safer through the eliminating terrorists and criminals, it puts their safety in danger in
another way that they deprive individuals of their right to privacy, making their private information
expose to the risks of being distorted and secondary use by the authorities without their consents and
creating a power imbalance between civilians and the

Mass Surveillance Analysis
When Edward Snowden leaked a large cache of classified NSA documents to the press in 2012 he
fanned the flames of an already suspicious public by revealing an astonishing amount of information
about the United States government's mass surveillance operations in our country, and around the
globe. These revelations weren't quite as surprising to many experts in the field of cryptography and
internet security, especially in the post 9/11 era, as the unprecedented amount of power granted to
the federal government in the wake of those attacks, in the form of the Patriot Act, has given rise to
warrantless wiretapping and blanket surveillance tactics that are used in the fight against domestic
terrorism. However, government surveillance dates back ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
These findings aim to better inform the reader of what constitutes true privacy in a surveillance, and
raise concerns about violations to our constitutional right to privacy and security in the digital age.
This work will also aim to identify the common methods that are used by Internet Service Providers
to protect their customers' personal information, and the lengths at which law enforcement and
government intelligence agencies will go through to compromise that protection and

Is 9/11 Necessary
The focus of our intelligence agencies to gather as much data as possible is completely wrong and
has had lethal consequences, from 9/11 to 7/7 to Paris, Brussels and Nice. You don't need all the data
about everybody in the world to discover and react to threats. If you do try to gather such vast
volumes of data, you flood your analysts, decision makers and police with garbage. They need the
right data and they need it in time. The only way to get there is by upfront filtering for targets, which
can be done through metadata – information about the sender, recipient and receiver of an email or
phone call. That, in turn, has a nice side–effect: it gives privacy to more than 99% of people who are
not known targets or demonstrating behaviour that ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
FRIEDRICH MOSER, A GOOD AMERICAN computerweekly.com 8–14 November 2016 20
Home News Artificial intelligence is on the march to replace traditional IT administrators How
Swedish bank prepared robot Amelia to provide customer services Finance firm Capital One invests
in talent to develop its IT workforce Editor's comment Buyer's guide to object storage A Good
American: a personal take on mass surveillance Eight tips to beat Oracle licence audits Downtime
and therefore it was impossible to guarantee their communication would not be caught up in the data
dragnet – really? ThinThread did exactly that as early as 1998. Commercial products, such as Narus,
used by NSA and various other countries have been doing it since 2002. Mass surveillance has led to
a complete power overreach of the executive branch over all other branches of government.
"Knowledge is power" has never been more true. Making my documentary A Good American was
an

What Is Edward Snowden Unethical
How would you feel if someone watched everything that you did online? After the Oklahoma City
Bombing in 1996, and the September 11 attacks, the federal government significantly expanded
counterterrorism and domestic surveillance law enforcement tools in order to prevent terrorism. In
1996, the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act was passed, which increased domestic
surveillance tools by law enforcement. In 2001, the federal government passed the USA PATRIOT
act, that expanded the authority and power of the intelligence community and law enforcement in
order to respond to domestic and international acts of terrorism. This also created the Department of
Homeland Security, that controls all almost all of the government agencies that are responsible for
preventing and responding to domestic terrorism. In 2013, Edward Snowden released many
classified ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Collecting data on everyone without a warrant or reasonable is assuming that everyone is guilty,
which is just wrong. The American justice system was built on innocent until proven guilty, and it is
unethical to force millions of Americans to give up their right to privacy just because of
unreasonable government suspicion. In the article "Edward Snowden", by Tim J. Watts, he discusses
Edward Snowden and what he has released about National Security Agency's surveillance of online
activity. In the article, he discusses some programs that the NSA has been using in order to collect
data; he says, "Internet companies, including Facebook, Google, Yahoo, Microsoft, and Apple, were
said to have allowed the NSA access to their servers, including the content of user's personal
communications. Other programs included surveillance of foreign embassies and mobile phone
usage in other countries." He is saying that the NSA is using companies to collect data on people's
personal conversations and messages. The NSA has absolutely no right to collect such personal
information about

Edward Snowden's Whistleblower Questions And Answers
Whistleblower Questions
Edward Snowden was a former NSA contractor who leaked documents to reporter Glenn
Greenwald. These documents revealed "detailed secret NSA programs and capabilities that have
been and continue to be used to collect and store personal communications both within the US and
abroad". His document leaks led to many people to question their security. They have led to
numerous investigations into the surveillance the U.S. is doing and violations of human rights to
privacy and freedom of information. Nineteen proposals for reformation are pending in the U.S.
Mark Fainaru–Wada and Steve Fainaru both published a book discussing the brain damage that is an
effect of constant head–on collisions that occurs in the sport. They shouldn't be considered
whistleblowers as much as Edward Snowden should. They both released information that could
potentially hurt the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
I knew head trauma and concussions was an issue in the NFL, but I was unaware of how it affected
the players. Also, it shined a light on how the NFL is almost completely money orientated. If they
weren't worried about the money the league gets, they would've allowed the doctors researching the
brains of the players who died because of the results of their injuries. Dr. Ira Casson, kept denying
the fact that the sport of football causing life–altering diseases, which further proved that money is a
leading factor in most, if not all, of their decisions.
Based on author, David Halberstam's quote that " Sport is a window on a changing society", I have
learned that high in rank companies, and leagues make many of their decisions based on money and
how it can help and hurt their company. Sports are a great example of this thinking because of how
public it is and many of the business decisions they make can be viewed by anyone. The American
society is changing a lot and it can be seen greatly through

Mass Surveillance and the Panopticon Analysis Essay
In Michael Foucault's "Discipline and Punish", the late eighteen century English philosopher Jeremy
Bentham's model of Panopticon was illustrated as a metaphor for the contemporary technologies of
mass surveillance. Originally derived from the measures to control "abnormal beings" against the
spreading of a plague, the Panopticon is an architecture designed to induce power with a permanent
sense of visibility. With a tower in the center, surrounded by cells, the prisoners can be monitored
and watched at any given time from the central tower. The goal of this architectural plan was to strip
away any privacy and therefore create fear induced self–regulation amongst the prisoners, with an
unverifiable gaze – The prisoners can never ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Just a gaze. An inspecting gaze, a gaze which each individual under its weight will end by
interiorising to the point that he is his own overseer, each individual thus exercising this surveillance
over, and against, himself. A superb formula: power exercised continuously and for what turns out to
be a minimal cost. (Foucault) " Despite the dehumanizing effect of Panopticon as an disciplinary
mechanism based on constant observation and examination with every movement supervised and all
events recorded. The Panopticon system as one of the most effective and economic models of
exercising power and control over an constantly increasing population, soon became a formula,
wide spread throughout our society. Along with the growing ethnology and capitalist economy,
various methods of Panopticon through mass surveillance soon earned it's place in numerous
regimes, becoming one of the most infinitely expandable Panopticon of the contemporary society.
Schools, factories, hospitals and prisons today resemble each other, they are fit into the format of a
panopticon structure, examining pupils, workers, patients and prisoners at any given time. When we
enter a building, make a phone call, purchase with a credit card, or visit a website, we are being
watched, if not recorded, analyzed. The increasing use of surveillance by commercial and
government entities caused the technology to become omnipresent in our lives. With the name of

Analysis Of George Orwell 's ' 1984 '
Privacy is an important issue, especially in the United States where the NSA looms over the internet,
tracking your every move. Privacy is what allows you to maintain your own individualism, what
makes you a person and especially your freedom. A growing debate concerning Orwell's 1984
relevancy is quickly on the rise. Orwell's fear of a totalitarian society led him to write this book as
he lived during the totalitarian movement in Russia. The fear of a totalitarian society spreading
sparked his fear and wrote this book to make people understand that it is not beneficial to society. I
feel that with the the National Security Agency in the United States, the issue and relevancy of 1984
has never been higher. The public is discovering on a daily basis that the NSA has much more
control than previously thought. Despite the fact that 1984 was published in 1949, it is still very
much a relevant topic today as the United States gradually turns into the level of surveillance that
Orwell had predicted in his novel. I believe 1984 is a crucial text for high schoolers to read, it is
more relevant today than it ever was in the past. With the internet, we are constantly revealing
details of our lives to the government and major corporations. One instance is the case with social
media. We voluntarily put information to companies such as Facebook and Twitter, taking our
personal data and selling it to advertisers. Some may argue the content we share about ourselves
online are voluntary

Person Of Interest Satire
Do you like the NSA spicing on you 24/7 without you even knowing? If you answer no, then Person
of Interest is a must watch show. Person of Interest, created by J.J. Abrams and Jonathan Nolan, is
about Harold Finch (a software genius) and John Reese (an ex–CIA agent) trying to stop the U.S.
government or possibly other governments from spicing on the American people. The TV show is
grounded in reality, the overarching story expands to new heights, and it is not afraid to kill off
important characters and bring in new ones. The television show is not terrified to change up its
formula to better suit its solution. It's not an out of this world idea, a super computer that predicts
people in very deadly life threating situations. In the "pilot" of Person of Interest, the tone is set
resulting in a very much–grounded reality. Everything that happens on the show does probably exist
or in a few years will. They use surveillance cameras that Finch hacks into. Reese with his
background training follows people that are in trouble. It predicts the future and if no one puts a stop
to it then the word ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Unlike most shows that are afraid to even think about harming one of their main characters, this
television show is not. In the episode "The Crossing" one of the main characters, Detective Joss
Carter, was taken off the board for good. In most shows we can predict what is going to happen
before it does but on this episode there were reasons for John Reese and Detective Fusco to be killed
off. Rees had his number come up, meaning he might be the one to be taken off. Fusco was in a very
deathly situation where he probably would not make it out. Neither was, until the very gut–
wrenching end, Carter was the one that met her end. After her big story arc was over and we thought
she was safe, that is when the writers of the show decided to shock the audience and end her

Mass Electronic Surveillance is an Invasion of Privacy Essay
Introduction
Privacy is central to our understanding of freedom of expression and thus on a larger scale
democracy. Mass surveillance is an invasion of common man's privacy. Recent development in the
way in which technology can invade privacy has heightened the need for greater protection freedom
of expression. However, a major problem in this area is that the public are not provided with
adequate information to act against such invasion of their rights. To date, there has been little
agreement to what extent mass surveillance should be allowed in the name of providing security to
the citizen of the country and to what extent privacy of the citizens of other countries should be
respected.
This essay seeks to remedy these problems by ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Mass surveillance has been used a tool to keep people's behaviour under control. Knowledge gives
power and someone will definitely have a greater advantage over you if they know everything about
you. Mass surveillance can be used to control the flow of opinion and suppress the opposition of all
forms.
There are two approaches to study mass surveillance one is Panoptic and other non –Panoptic
approach. Foucault uses philosopher Jeremy Bentham concept of 'Panoptic prison for describing
surveillance has been widely recognized, where all the prisoners have no clue when they are under
surveillance, hence they behave as if they constantly under surveillance which ultimately disciplined
and reform them.' Thus to some extent mass surveillance can act as a way to discipline people and
keep them under control. Some authors approach surveillance in non–panoptic way where
surveillance has positive aspects like protection and security and where everyone has an opportunity
to surveil (Allmer. T, 2012:128). But non – Panoptic approach does not take into account
asymmetric power relations and repressive aspects of society into consideration (Allmer. T, 2012:
135). So this essay will use panoptic approach to study mass surveillance. As human being we all
indulge in some kind of surveillance like 'social surveillance' (Joinson 2008, Tokunaga 2011). An
average

Mass Surveillance Controversy
Before the technological age, there were thousands of years in which the only way to record an
image was to painstakingly spend countless hours painting it onto a canvas. Now, we have the
ability to record video, in amazingly high definition, with a camera lense that is remarkably small.
With the boom that technology has had, we have not been able to keep up with the laws that
surround it. One such controversy, is the use of mass surveillance. We have been unable to decide if
it is ethical to breach everyone's right to privacy in the name of supposedly preventing crime. After a
careful analysis of the benefits and liabilities that mass surveillance brings, it was found that mass
surveillance is a breach of people's right to privacy, and is impractical in preventing crime. ... Show
Those boxes allow you to see what others are up to, and others to see what you are up to. Brin seems
to forget that the government needs his accountability matrix as well, and is particularly fond of box
number two (tools that prevent [citizens] from seeing what [the government is] up to). Their access
to box number two is needed, lest we allow criminals access to sensitive information. He goes on to
say, "Two millennia ago Juvenal posed the riddle, 'Who shall watch the watchman?' There is just one
answer. We all will" (Brin 475) implying that we would be the ones to make sure the government is
just with it's usage of the mass surveillance systems. Much like we made sure it was just in it's
dealing with the segregation of African Americans, and made sure that everything was 'separate but
equal'. We are unable to trust the government, as well as its citizens, to make sure that mass
surveillance is used justly. We should prevent the pyromaniac form starting fires by not allowing
them

Pros And Cons Of STOP Mass Surveillance
STOP MASS SURVEILLANCE!
"I think this mass surveillance by the NSA was never about terrorism: It's all about
economic spying & social control. It's about POWER. (Ziad K. Abdelnour) The National
Security Agency (NSA) is responsible for protecting the United States national security systems and
to produce foreign signals intelligence information. Some of their tactics have been considered
controversial and have been criticized by organizations like the American Civil Liberties Union
(ACLU). The ACLU organization protects rights. The ACLU works," to defend and preserve the
individual rights and liberties guaranteed by the Constitution and laws of the U.S." ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
The NSA has weakened the security of our internet. But overall the NSA has alot of bad efeccts on
the USA. The NSA technology surveillance is extraordinarily costly which is constantly driving
America in to more debt. They spend at least 1.2 million building cloud computing computers.
James R. Clapper, Director of National Intelligence lied about the NSA surveillance programs. He
was questioned about the NSA collecting data on millions of Americans and he denied it. In brief
this is significant because American Citizens should know what the NSA is really

Mass Surveillance Pros And Cons
"Knowledge is power. Information is power. The secreting or hoarding of knowledge or information
may be an act of tyranny camouflaged as humility." – Robin Morgan With all the atrocities
unfolding around us from the rise of ISIL to the recent Parliament Hill Shootings in Ottawa, it is
easy for us to think – on impulse – that we need to do more to keep ourselves safe. It is easy for spy
agencies to operate on the belief that they need to collect more of our information to fulfill their
responsibilities. Indeed, the American NSA, the British GCHQ and many other intelligence agencies
around the world have created mass surveillance apparatuses with unprecedented sizes and levels of
sophistication. Unfortunately, mass surveillance is a step in the wrong direction. Though well–
intentioned, these programs are principally unjustified, and have detrimental ramifications. Mass
surveillance (also known bulk surveillance) is the "close observation of an entire population, or a
substantial fraction of the population" (USLegal). Examples of bulk surveillance technologies
include, but are not limited to: the use of street cameras, the use of surveillance drones, the creation
of biometric identification databases, the collection of phone records, and the monitoring of internet
traffic. Of course, some surveillance is quite necessary in any civilized society. Side affirmative
supports the use of traditional, targeted surveillance techniques as opposed to the indiscriminate
collection of

Political Dispute Over Mass Surveillance Technology
Political Dispute Over Mass Surveillance Technology
As American citizens we want to live in a country where privacy and protection can live in harmony.
This is the political dispute surrounding mass surveillance technology, because the reality is that
perfect harmony isn't possible at this time. Social groups in conflict over this issue are divided into
two categories; government agencies such as the FBI, CIA, and most prominently the NSA versus
civil society groups like American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), and Electronic Frontier
Foundation (EFF), as well as powerful people like Edward Snowden, and technology companies
including Microsoft, Apple, Twitter, and Google (Nakashima 2015).
These sides are clear. Which is understandable. Those government agencies were founded on the
notion of protecting us, and that is a standard that as Americans we have come to expect. The
September 11th attacks shook up that standard, bringing surveillance technology to the forefront of
concern. The benefits these agencies uphold are deep–rooted in the ideals of keeping citizens safe.
In an article published in The New York Post, Representative Vito Fossella (R) argues that the
Patriot Act needs renewal to avoid turning "back the homeland–security clock to Sept. 10, 2001"
(Fossella 2006). The fear of another national security breach such as Sept. 11th is what drives the
pro side of the mass surveillance technology debate. From their perspective, surveillance technology
is extremely

Increasing Security During Modern Society
Increased Security In Modern Society
How do you think the families of victims of mass shootings feel when they get the news that their
child was killed. Think back to probably the worst school shooting shook the country when 26
people were killed at Sandy Hook Elementary School and 20 out of the 26 were children. Then more
mass shootings have occurred and terrorist attacks. There clearly needs to be an increase of security
in modern society. Security in modern society should be increased by the use of metal detectors, gun
laws, and surveillance for the people.
First of all there have been too many terror attacks, school shootings, and mass shootings in modern
society. Too many people have been killed. In 2016 study by the FBI the number of mass shootings
in 2016 was 3, and 60 people were killed combined (qtd. in Willingham). A really bad mass shooting
was the Orlando night club shooting. In a report with Sky News the shooters father Seddique
Mateen stated " That club should have had good security." This shows that the security needed to be
stronger and if they did catch him before his act 49 people would not be dead. This problem needs to
stop.
There are many causes that have an effect on mass shootings and school shootings precisely. When
the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting occurred, investigators found several video games in
the shooters home. Those games were the following: "Grand Theft Auto, Doom and Left 4 Dead"
(Good 1). The craziest thing that investigators

NSA Mass Surveillance
The integrity of one's communications and privacy of online activities is the largest casualty of the
National Security Agency's (NSA) surveillance over digital lives. Years since September 11, 2009,
the NSA's mass surveillance has greatly expanded due to the heightened concern that new
technology can be used by terrorists to plan and execute a terrorist attack. In today's age of
technology, there are easier ways of accessing information and communication as well as new ways
of hacking and gathering personal information. The new surveillance programs and regulations are
enabled by the Patriot Act and post 9/11 paranoia, but it has been over fourteen years since the
incident. After whistleblower, Edward Snowden, it was revealed that the government's mass
surveillance went beyond what many considered acceptable. It can be predicted that unless the U.S
Government reins in NSA mass surveillance, the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Amendment states that "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers,
and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall
issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation" (Bill of Rights). The amendment's
intention was to create a constitutional defense for Americans and limit the intimidating power of
law enforcement. It established and protected the people's privacy by recognizing their rights by
restricting activities that are "unreasonable" or not authorized by a warrant based upon probable
cause. The amendment still remains as vitally important today as when it was enacted by balancing
the interests of the government with that of the people's right to be free of unreasonable conduct.
Though during post 9/11, the context of the amendment was utilized in a different way than the
Founding Fathers

Edward Snowden: Mass Surveillance In Research
2013, Edward Snowden leaks NSA documentation revealing that both the USA and the UK have
undertaken what could be deemed to be unlawful programmes of mass surveillance. Issues like this
are of great significance to me due to how it compromises Human Rights and Civil Liberties. It
makes me wonder, where do you draw the line between impeding Human Rights and ensuring
security? Through my history studies, I have acquired skills such as critical analysis, the portrayal of
opinions alongside facts and undertaking referenced research. These skills prove invaluable in the
judicial system and have allowed me to appreciate the need for a rounded skill set in order to study
law. Whilst reading ahead of my Government and Politics A Level, I have come across many
fascinating current affairs and have actively been reading around these topics, recently ... Show
What intrigued me most here was the emphasis placed on "The Rule of Law" and after further
attending more sessions, I began to grasp the concept more securely. I then further took part in a
mitigation plea workshop at the Inner Temple to learn more about the principle of "The Rule of
Law" as well as developing my ability to read between the lines and interpret facts to favour my side
of the argument after taking part in many Australasian styles of debates. After making an effort to
attend a Q&A session hosted at the Bar, I gained greater insight into what it takes to enter the
profession but has also led me to develop a greater level of independence in proactively pursuing a
career as a barrister as well as identifying the more challenging aspects of the career. I hope to
further develop as a more rounded person during my gap year whilst being on my voluntary
conscription in the Finnish military; aiming to enhance my management and communicational

Nsa 's Surveillance On U.s. Spy Programme
The NSA is an agency that started surveillance on U.S. citizens and people around the world after
9/11 occurred to ensure the nation's security. The goal of the NSA is to ultimately protect citizens of
the U.S. and to keep a massive terrorist event from occurring in the country again. The NSA
collected numerous amounts of data on people to find any type of threat that could lead to the
distress of the country, but citizens were not aware of this surveillance. The NSA's secret was
eventually exposed and left not only U.S. citizens, but countries around the world outraged. As
mentioned in the article, Edward Snowden: Leaks That Exposed US Spy Programme, by BBC
News, "The scandal broke in early June 2013 when the Guardian newspaper ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
The problem is that the NSA clearly has the resources and ability to place surveillance on people, so
even though there is some reform, it is still unknown as to what they are doing in secret. The NSA
and the government seem to be making changes from the outside, but on the inside they can still
continue to get information as they please because of the access they already have in place. Edward
Snowden was a man who worked for the NSA and exposed all of the information that the NSA was
accessing from U.S. citizens and those people around the world. Through his actions Snowden did
break the law, "He has been charged with theft of government property, unauthorized
communication of national defense information and willful communication of classified
communications intelligence" (BBC News). Even though Snowden knew he would be charged for
his actions, he still wanted to do the right thing and expose to the people what the NSA was doing.
Snowden was looking at the information that was being collected and realized it was not necessary
to keep Americans safe. Instead, collecting this information was abruptly digging into their lives and
going against their rights as human beings. When this information was exposed, the citizens wanted
the government and the NSA to ultimately change what exactly they were accessing and how they
were accessing it. This event that Snowden

National Security Agency Values
We all value our privacy, and we all know that privacy can conflict with other important social
values. However, in this increasingly digital and technological world, we are more susceptible than
ever to government intrusion of our digital communications and data. This came to light in June
2013, when former National Security Agency (NSA) employee Edward Snowden revealed
thousands of classified documents detailing the intrusive mass surveillance and bulk data collection
of the NSA to journalists and subsequently the American public. As a result, widespread distrust and
questioning of the American government's data–collection programs grew among American citizens
and bipartisan leaders who were also subject to the surveillance apparatus of the ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
Hardline conservatives like Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell opposed the Freedom Act as
they defended mass surveillance as a crucial means of counterterrorism and maintaining national
security. They also thought that the act would make the U.S. vulnerable to more terrorist attacks, as
it would slow down the ability of the NSA and other agencies to lawfully acquire information
necessary to counterterrorism efforts. Although also against the Freedom Act, liberals like Bernie
Sanders opposed the act for different reasons. Strong privacy supporters like Sanders denounced the
act for not doing enough for privacy rights and argued that it would have been a better alternative to
have allowed the Patriot Act and Section 215 to sunset and expire in order for a more effective
reform bill to be passed into

Persuasive Essay On Surveillance
In modern Western societies the notion that surveillance is spreading while privacy is eroding is
very well alive. Throughout history it has never been easier to access information about a specific
person or groups of people then it is now. With technology available to almost everyone in modern
society the ability to track, view, and gather information is greater than it has ever been. Many
municipalities, companies, and even private home owners have implemented Closed Circuit
Television in order to surveil people within the area they choose. Applications on phones,
Computers, and Smart televisions are all things people use daily that surveil and track you, anything
you send or view through technology can potentially be recorded for others to see. A person's entire
day can be tracked by simply following their footprints through technology, this means that "flying
under the radar" is almost impossible unless you never leave your home and do not use any sort of
technology. A big factor in collecting and storing data that surveillance technologies capture has
come as a result of the Internet. Its worldwide availability has made people more educated through
the sharing of knowledge, however, we have also given up a great deal of our privacy because of it.
There are many myths surrounding surveillance, we are told that it is limited in scope, normal,
necessary, effective, and fair, however, if we start to understand and study surveillance we will end
up with a much different

Mass Surveillance In America
The Chicago state government's decision of closing over 61 school buildings and 54 public schools,
mostly attended by children of color from low–income families is an example of the contemporary
practice of "Newspeak" – making as may as 30,000 youths uneducated. Of the 61 schools closed, 49
served elementary school students, 90 percent of whom are African American.
As a result, kids from poor families become less educated, making them more likely to commit
crimes, and as more black Americans become violent, illegal massive incarceration becomes more
likely to happen. By 2004, 13.5 percent of the black men in their twenties were in jail or prison. As
Michelle Alexander, professor of law at Ohio State University points out that "mass incarceration ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Whether they are the stories of the massive surveillance, or the stories of 30,000 American students
whose public schools were closed, they all present striking resemblance to George Orwell's
dystopian society in 1984. The matters of privacy, equality, and political engagement and
participation that are foundational to any functioning democracy has been compromised by the new
authoritarianism in the United States. At heart of these authoritarian control is anti–intellectualism,
civic illiteracy, and a static social norm conditioned to comply with the violations of privacy and the
privatization of public

Essay On Mass Surveillance
"Mass Surveillance
In May of 2013 Edward Snowden leaked NSA documents revealing that the organization had been,
warrantlessly spying on U.S. citizens, via the internet. (Britannica) The information leaked showed
that the NSA had been tapping phones and monitoring citizenâ€™s text messages, emails and social
media. (NPR) Snowden has said that he brought these documents to light, not to discredit the
governmentâ€™s method, but to expose itâ€™s methods. Snowden wanted to allow the people of
the United States to decide for themselves. (Britannica)
In the wake of 9/11 the U.S. began to implement these types of operations, and until 2013, the
people of the U.S. had no knowledge of it. The government justifies mass surveillance by claiming
that it is used for counter terrorism. (NPR) The government claims that the NSA has been able to
stop around 50 terrorists attacks, before they happened. This statistic isnâ€™t easy to analyse,
because the attacks the government claims ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
(NPR) The 4th amendment protects U.S. citizens from unwarranted search and seizures and
warrants would only be issued if there was probable cause. (Cornell) While the 9th amendment
ensured the rights of citizens, that werenâ€™t explicitly stated in the Bill of Rights. (Cornell) This is
where the legality of mass surveillance gets messy, because the law is supposed to uphold the
Constitution, but the patriot act violates the 4th and arguably the 9th amendment. (Cornell) The
people are what makes a democracy a democracy, without the people there are only the politicians,
and they canâ€™t be expected to make the right decisions if the people who voted for them are not
keeping them in check. The government has a reasonable paranoia of terrorism, but if this nation is
to live in fear, under mass surveillance, then that is not freedom. It violates the very principles this
country was founded

Mass Surveillance : A Questionable Activity Essay
Mass Surveillance: A Questionable Activity
On September 11, 2001 people's eyes from all over the world were witnessing one of the most
dramatic events that was broadcast live. This major terrorist attack was followed by many, and lead
our governments to take drastic measures to prevent as much as possible this kind of situation to
happen again. Privacy did not become the first priority for the authorities, safety was. When Edward
Snowden released through media classified National Security Agency's documents regarding global
surveillance among citizens, he opened a debate over mass surveillance and its legitimacy, which is
still ongoing. Even though it can be used for the greater good, mass surveillance clearly leads to
some issues that have both a significant impact on the population and the government.
Proponent point out that global surveillance is necessary for assuring safety of a country. In the
actual climate of tension and insecurity, as a result of terrorism, it is important for our countries to
apply the best strategy to defend themselves. In fact, recent events have showed that many terrorist
attacks were thwarted because authorities were able to track potential terrorists' activities. No later
than last September, a 23–year–old woman, followed by two others, was arrested after trying to
commit a bombing near the cathedral Notre Dame de Paris (Chrisafis). Nevertheless, authorizing
mass surveillance among the population appears to go against the international

The Threat Of Cyber Security
Safety or Freedom In the last decade, technology has evolved dramatically. Even to the point in
which is indispensable in our lives. As the world becomes more and more interconnected through
technology, the amount of information that is stored in servers all around the world continues to
grow. At the same time, governments, businesses, organizations, military groups, and terrorist
groups are constantly developing new technology in order to achieve a competitive advantage over
the rest of the world. The technology of today is much more advanced, powerful, and dangerous
than the technology from ten years ago, even to the point in which a single cyber–attack can cause
the death of millions of people. For that reason, cyber security has ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
There are different types of attacks that could result in different outcomes. Terrorists groups are one
of the most dangerous because technology is facilitating their work. These groups use technology
like smart phones, computers, and other technology to communicate from remote locations and
organize and conduct attacks in different parts of the world, including the United States. In order for
the intelligence services of the United States to protect the country from these types of attacks and
function effectively, they need to implement operations in secret.
One of the most controversial secret activity of the last decade is the national security agency's
surveillance program. The surveillance program was authorized by President Busch right after the
September 11th 2001 terrorist's attacks. For many years, the national security agency collected and
monitored vast amounts of communications data, mainly phone records, from the people living in
the United Sates. One of the main issues of this program is that it violates the privacy of the people.
"news reports have asserted that the NSA has conducted warrantless spying on the phone and e–mail
communications of thousands of people inside the U.S., and has been secretly collecting the phone
call records of millions of Americans, using data provided by major telecommunications companies,
including AT&T" (Zetter). The way the national security

Mass Surveillance Research Paper
Mass surveillance in Muslim neighborhoods in the United States.
What is your thesis?
The United States government agencies like the FBI and NSA have invested lots of time, effort, and
money towards the security of its citizens and the prevention of terrorism since the attacks on the
World Trade Center on September of 2001. The efforts have not prevented any major terrorist
attacks since then; the efforts have been unsuccessful. These agencies have relied on discriminatory
profiling of individuals based on their religion and place of origin; allowing for the association of
Islam and people of Arab decent with terrorism–related crimes. The decision of monitoring a whole
group of people should be based on crime rates rather then race and religion. ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
Presidential Candidate Ted Cruz said law enforcement should be empowered to "patrol and secure
Muslim neighborhoods before they become radicalized.""
How is the problem or issue best resolved?
No security apparitions can prevent a guy from building a bomb in his basement. Tapping into many
people's phones is not the same as searching one person's house. Targeted surveillance is already
used in many other countries. To take full advantage of this existing potential, we need better
international cooperation and more effective security and foreign policies and better application of
our present laws instead of creating new and stricter ones that undermine our freedom. Let us not,
out of fear, destroy what we are most proud of, democracy and our fundamental rights and liberties.
must be authorized by duly enacted laws or properly authorized executive orders;
must be directed exclusively at protecting national security interests of the United States or our
allies;
must not be directed at illicit or illegitimate ends, such as the theft of trade secrets or obtaining
commercial gain for domestic

The Government 's Support For Mass Surveillance Of Its...
Research Question:
Does the proposed 'Investigatory Powers Bill' go far enough to reconcile the current threats to
privacy generated by RIPA 2000 in relation to the bulk interception of communications of UK
citizens?
Principal Issues That This Question Raises, and Brief Description of The Substantive Content:
Chapter 1: Why does the UK Government need to intercept the private communications of its
citizens, and why did it enact the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (RIPA) 2000 for the
purpose of doing so?
This introductory chapter will explore the reasoning behind the UK Government's support for mass
surveillance of its citizens. It is evident that communications technology can be exploited for
nefarious purposes. The principal reasons for the introduction of RIPA 2000 can be found within the
act itself, these are; upholding national security, preventing or detecting serious crime, and to ensure
the nation's economic well–being. These driving factors shall be explored further to see how they
shaped RIPA 2000. Additionally, This chapter will consider how the meaning of the term 'national
security' has been extended in the 21st Century, and how this helped to facilitate the enactment of
RIPA 2000.
Chapter 2: What are the failings of RIPA 2000 in relation to the way in which allows for
communications to be intercepted? Has the recent development of this legislative framework
worsened the issues?
This chapter shall evaluate the principal failings of RIPA 2000 and the

Mass Surveillance Essay
Introduction to Mass Surveillance Throughout the history of the United States, the government has
spied on its citizens by using NSA's surveillance program. Under the program, the National Security
Agency was monitoring calls, emails, facebook posts, text messages, and internet activities used by
people all over the world; in order to fight terrorism, prevent social unrest, and to protect the
national security. While there are many different opinions on mass surveillance. NSA is breaking our
First–Amendment right to freedom of speech in addition to our Fourth–Amendment rights,
privileged communications. Background Statement These are the significant cases, statutes and
executive orders that give rise to the present issue. 1919 – The United ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
People engage self censorship when the government watch people through CCTV, read e–mails, and
monitor phone conversations. Mass surveillance is limiting the right to freedom of speech because
the government is watching and hearing what they say. People are afraid and don't say what they
would usually say. The case Unitarian Church Group v. NSA, plaintiff complaints on how
government collection of telephone records is unconstitutional and it violates the First Amendment
rights of association. The coalition is represented by EFF. NSA uses a program called the
Associational Tracking Program and it is an electronic surveillance program that collects and
acquires telephone communications information for all telephone calls transiting the networks of all
major American telecommunication companies, including Verizon, AT&T, and Sprint. Every day,
the Associational Tracking Program collects information about millions of telephone calls made by
millions of Americans. This includes information about all calls made within the United States,
including local telephone calls, as well as communications between the United States and

The Importance Of Mass Surveillance
Mass surveillance is a highly controversial topic. On one hand, it could be argued that mass
surveillance exists for the greater good of humanity. With mass surveillance, there is always
someone watching or someone capable of watching which could instil the feeling of safety for some.
For, if something bad should happen, there would be evidence for such an event. This concept
makes sense when you imagine 'good' people behind the screen, using surveillance for the selfless
act of making sure others are safe and unharmed. However, what happens when ulterior motives
come into play? Mass surveillance can, and often does become corrupt. In Cory Doctorow's Down
and Out in the Magic Kingdom, mass surveillance, mixed with social status being dependent on how
others perceive you combined to make a society that can never really be themselves. While in
Charles Stross's Concrete Jungle, mass surveillance takes on a sinister function, as it is used hurt
people, rather than protect them. Mass surveillance, even with the greatest of intentions, usually end
up accomplishing the complete opposite of what it was originally intended to do. In both of these
novels, mass surveillance, designed to protect people end up hindering and hurting them in the end.
Cory Doctorow's Down and Out in the Magic Kingdom, as you could infer from the title, is set in
Disney World. Disney World in the novel is much like Disney World in the present day in terms of
surveillance of the park. The problem with mass

Mass Surveillance And The Invasion Of Privacy
The mass surveillance and the invasion of privacy has been on a steady incline since the 1980s. No
one knows for sure how many closed–circuit television cameras have be are installed, but estimates
range from 3.2 to 4.2 million. ("Right of Privacy"). Not only has mass surveillance increased but
also the amount of terror attacks have also increased around the world. The protection of a nation's
citizens is the most crucial and is highly important for a nation's success. Although privacy should
never be taken away, terror attacks and domestic violence can be avoided if government had access
to emails, phones, and documents; therefore, surveillance of individuals suspected of foreign or
domestic terrorists is necessary. Tuesday, September 11, 2001, a terrorist attack in the U.S. killed
2,996 people. On October 26, 2001, the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing
Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001(USA PATRIOT act)
became a law. Therefore, the government does not need a warrant to surveillance anyone suspected
as a terrorist. Most of the law enforcement tools the act allowed were already legal surveillance
methods used to investigate organized crime and drug trafficking; the Patriot Act expanded their use
to terrorism cases and made them easier to implement. The act also improved information sharing
between intelligence agencies and allowed authorities to apprehend suspected terrorists quicker
("Civil Rights"). Furthermore, the

Mass Surveillance Pros Cons Debate

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Christina Santos

More from Christina Santos (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Mass Surveillance Pros Cons Debate