CHAMP report update - December 2, 2015

1. CHAMP Leadership Team
December 2, 2015

2. Overview
• Questions for the group. What have you liked,
not liked?
• Project highlights
• Strategies to accomplish outcomes
• Status update: 9 project outcomes
• What do you want to see the consortium
accomplish in this last push?

3. Questions for the group
• What else do you want to see this consortium accomplish?
• What changes can we make internally to do a better job
with the project?
• How can we get your current employees into training
through PLA?
• We want people in internships, what can we do to increase
this use?
• How could we build apprenticeships out of this project?
• Is soft skills training working? Do people who go through
the programs seem better.
• Challenged in filling night classes. When we try to do
incumbent worker training employers don’t want people to
take off work. And employees don’t want to give up nights
and weekends when they don’t see the pay off.

4. Highlights to date
• 285 Courses developed in 102 programs at
consortium colleges
• 203 Non-duplicated courses developed as open
educational resources (OER)
• 143 courses published to open educational
resources (OER) to share
• 10 transfer and articulation agreements signed.
15 in progress.
• Prior Learning Assessment (PLA) policy developed
and adopted. # colleges and # staff attended
training on implementation

5. More highlights
• Navigators work highlighted nationally
through evaluation for successful strategies
working with students
• MOOC’s have enrolled 6933 students. 3270 in
math, 493 in PLA, 2340 in employability and
830 in Web Accessibility.
• MfgWorksCO website at
www.MfgWorksCO.com

6. Strategies to accomplish outcomes
• Redesign Credit for Prior Learning
• Develop curriculum to align with NIMS
• Increase transfer and articulation agreements
• Navigators improve retention & employment
• Develop hybrid and online courses
• Develop 3 MOOC's
• Build portfolio template for manufacturing
• Develop employment skills for CHAMP participants
• Build interactive career map
• Create internships and coordinate employer outreach

7. Some Outstanding Work
• 13 courses align with NIMS standards at FRCC
• CWDC sponsored manufacturing sectors
partnerships – mini grants for expansion
• 65 courses from LCC, PPCC and FRCC
published at the start of the project to OER
making them leader colleges
• LCC integration of hybrid learning in career
education
• 95 internship opportunities created. 46 at
MSU the most in the consortium!

8. Plans we’re started on
• PLA dashboard tool
• Increase transfer and articulation agreements
• Integrate navigator work with 1165 case
managers
• Support for the manufacturing sectors
initiatives

9. Required Project Outcomes
1. Total unique participants served
2. Total number of participants completing a TACT funded program
3. Total number still retained in their program or other TACT funded
program
4. Total number of participants completing credit hours
5. total number of participants earning credentials
6. Total number of participants enrolled in further education after TACT
program completion
7. Total number of unemployed participants employed after TACT
funded program completion
8. Total number of participants from 7 retained in employment after
TACT program completion
9. Total number of those employed at enrollment who receive a wage
increase post enrollment

10. Overall Consortium
CHAMP Goal Year 1 and Year 2 Actual % to goal
1 1785 2274 127%
2 1130 681 60%
3 799 1033 129%
4 1309 1840 141%
5 1030 783 76%
6 411 234 57%
7 805 83 10%
8 661 27 4%
9 766 688 90%

11. Spending
• Half way through the project, expect half of
the budget to be spent.

12. Questions for the group
• What else do you want to see this consortium accomplish?
• What changes can we make internally to do a better job
with the project?
• How can we get your current employees into training
through PLA?
• We want people in internships, what can we do to increase
this use?
• How could we build apprenticeships out of this project?
• Is soft skills training working? Do people who go through
the programs seem better.
• Challenged in filling night classes. When we try to do
incumbent worker training employers don’t want people to
take off work. And employees don’t want to give up nights
and weekends when they don’t see the pay off.

13. Other questions and comments?

14. Aims Outcomes
• Total unique participants served
• Total number of participants completing a TACT funded program
• Total number still retained in their program or other TACT funded program
• Total number of participants completing credit hours
• Total number of participants earning credentials
• Total number of participants enrolled in further education after TACT
program completion
• Total number of unemployed participants employed after TACT funded
program completion
• Total number of participants from 7 retained in employment after TACT
program completion
• Total number of those employed at enrollment who receive a wage
increase post enrollment

15. CCD Outcomes
1. Total unique participants served
2. Total number of participants completing a TACT funded program
3. Total number still retained in their program or other TACT funded
program
4. Total number of participants completing credit hours
5. Total number of participants earning credentials
6. Total number of participants enrolled in further education after TACT
program completion
7. Total number of unemployed participants employed after TACT funded
program completion
8. Total number of participants from 7 retained in employment after TACT
program completion
9. Total number of those employed at enrollment who receive a wage
increase post enrollment

16. EGTC Outcomes
1. Total unique participants served
2. Total number of participants completing a TACT funded program
3. Total number still retained in their program or other TACT funded
program
4. Total number of participants completing credit hours
5. total number of participants earning credentials
6. Total number of participants enrolled in further education after TACT
program completion
7. Total number of unemployed participants employed after TACT funded
program completion
8. Total number of participants from 7 retained in employment after TACT
program completion
9. Total number of those employed at enrollment who receive a wage
increase post enrollment

17. FRCC Outcomes
1. Total unique participants served
2. Total number of participants completing a TACT funded program
3. Total number still retained in their program or other TACT funded
program
4. Total number of participants completing credit hours
5. Total number of participants earning credentials
6. Total number of participants enrolled in further education after TACT
program completion
7. Total number of unemployed participants employed after TACT funded
program completion
8. Total number of participants from 7 retained in employment after TACT
program completion
9. Total number of those employed at enrollment who receive a wage
increase post enrollment

18. LCC Outcomes
1. Total unique participants served
2. Total number of participants completing a TACT funded program
3. Total number still retained in their program or other TACT funded
program
4. Total number of participants completing credit hours
5. total number of participants earning credentials
6. Total number of participants enrolled in further education after TACT
program completion
7. Total number of unemployed participants employed after TACT funded
program completion
8. Total number of participants from 7 retained in employment after TACT
program completion
9. Total number of those employed at enrollment who receive a wage
increase post enrollment

19. MSU Outcomes
1. Total unique participants served
2. Total number of participants completing a TACT funded program
3. Total number still retained in their program or other TACT funded
program
4. Total number of participants completing credit hours
5. Total number of participants earning credentials
6. Total number of participants enrolled in further education after TACT
program completion
7. Total number of unemployed participants employed after TACT funded
program completion
8. Total number of participants from 7 retained in employment after TACT
program completion
9. Total number of those employed at enrollment who receive a wage
increase post enrollment

20. PPCC Outcomes
1. Total unique participants served
2. Total number of participants completing a TACT funded program
3. Total number still retained in their program or other TACT funded
program
4. Total number of participants completing credit hours
5. Total number of participants earning credentials
6. Total number of participants enrolled in further education after TACT
program completion
7. Total number of unemployed participants employed after TACT funded
program completion
8. Total number of participants from 7 retained in employment after TACT
program completion
9. Total number of those employed at enrollment who receive a wage
increase post enrollment

21. PCC Outcomes
1. Total unique participants served
2. Total number of participants completing a TACT funded program
3. Total number still retained in their program or other TACT funded
program
4. Total number of participants completing credit hours
5. Total number of participants earning credentials
6. Total number of participants enrolled in further education after TACT
program completion
7. Total number of unemployed participants employed after TACT funded
program completion
8. Total number of participants from 7 retained in employment after TACT
program completion
9. Total number of those employed at enrollment who receive a wage
increase post enrollment

22. RRCC Outcomes
1. Total unique participants served
2. Total number of participants completing a TACT funded program
3. Total number still retained in their program or other TACT funded
program
4. Total number of participants completing credit hours
5. Total number of participants earning credentials
6. Total number of participants enrolled in further education after TACT
program completion
7. Total number of unemployed participants employed after TACT funded
program completion
8. Total number of participants from 7 retained in employment after TACT
program completion
9. Total number of those employed at enrollment who receive a wage
increase post enrollment

23. CC BY Attribution
Workforce Development presentation by Brenda M. Perea is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution
4.0 International License. Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at CCCS.edu/CHAMP.
This workforce solution was funded by a grant awarded by the U.S. Department of Labor’s Employment and
Training Administration. The solution was created by the grantee and does not necessarily reflect the official
position of the U.S. Department of Labor. The Department of Labor makes no guarantees, warranties, or
assurances of any kind, express or implied, with respect to such information, including any information on
linked sites, and including, but not limited to accuracy of the information or its completeness, timeliness,
usefulness, adequacy, continued availability or ownership.