Cyrus Strengths

Cyrus Strengths
Persia began not as a mighty empire but as a group of people who migrated from Russia to modern
day Iran approximately one thousand years before Christ. Although Persia eventually engulfs other
cultures and accumulates a vast land mass area, it began as disconnected peoples who settled in
different areas of northern and southern Iran. This separation continued until the Medes of northern
Iran decided to push south menacing their neighbors. Persian King Cyrus not only fought back the
Medes, he seized their land and deemed it his first satrapie.
Acquiring a large area of land left Cyrus little choice; he had to ordain someone to govern parts of
his empire. Cyrus installed Satraps, wealthy, loyal governors, to help manage the far reaches of
Persia. According to the recording the Rise of the Persians, each Satrap was able to exert limited
control of his area but must also be accountable to the king (Zayac). This allowed Cyrus to regulate
his vast kingdom from afar. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Along with an immense military, Cyrus used cunning negotiation and diplomatic skills to help
expand Persia's reach. Professor Zayac elucidates that Cyrus saw how people fought back against
harsh and oppressive rule from the Assyrians and decided instead to cultivate a land of acceptance
(Rise of Persians). This new system allowed for other culture's traditions and religions to be freely
practiced, so long as mandatory laws were followed and taxes were paid. This kind of welcoming
atmosphere helped to smooth the way for the entrance of the Babylonians into the Persian
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Alexander The Great Research Paper
Alexander the Great crossed the Hellespont with his combined Macedonian and Greek forces and
stepped upon the shores of Anatolia. This is the first attack against the Persians on their land. The
battle began on May of 334 B.C. ("Battle of the Granicus"). The twenty day march consisted of
32,000 infantry and 5,100 cavalry. This battle was very significant because it is one of the earliest
battles on record that was won by cavalry strength and through coronation of infantry support.
Although Alexander was close to losing and dying, he managed to win through his battle tactics and
massive army. High command governors (satraps) made an army of 10,000 cavalry and 5,000
infantry. They were sent to the town of Zelea in the western part of Asia Minor. ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
He planned to burn crops, farms, and villages to deprive Alexander's army from food and supplies
and to avoid battle. Since Memnon was Greek, the satraps did not trust him and did not want to see
their land burnt. The satraps advised to stay and defend the province, like a defensive line. These
Persian satraps were confident in defeating Alexander. Alexander was a young king with little
potential. They did not take the attack seriously. Also, Persia thought they were superior because
they had a famous, well respected, and strongest cavalry in existence. This cavalry easily defeated
barbarian attacks. The Persian cavalry had two objectives in this battle. The first objective was to
lure Alexander towards a carefully chosen position. If Alexander did not move towards this position,
the Persians would be able to take advantage and flank him from behind, making him give up. This
means that all communication to the rest of Alexander's army would be cut off. The second
objective, was to hold off Alexander's infantry, while capitalizing their cavalry. In keeping with their
plan, the Persians advanced from Zelea to the nearby Granicus River. The Persian chose this river
because the river is a horrible place to fight, giving them an

What Are The Changes In Middle Eastern Civilization
Early civilizations in the Middle East began with the Sumerians in the Tigris– Euphrates delta. This
civilization evolved into the Persian Empire through many other groups of people. Civilizations of
the Middle East changed over time politically, socially, and culturally. The change occurred through
types of government, economic class, and religion. Middle Eastern government began with rule by
priests, but became a dynasty. Economic class began as a system based on how much property one
owned, and became based on bloodline. Religion started out polytheistic, but the idea of
monotheism grew more popular over time. The civilizations of the Middle East changed politically
through systems of government.
Governing bodies evolved throughout the time of ancient Middle Eastern civilization. When the
Sumerians settled in the Fertile Crescent, they divided into city–states. In each city–state, a
Sumerian priest controlled the daily lives of the people from a chief building called the Ziggurat.
Then in 3100 BCE, a leader named Menes launched Egypt's first dynasty. A dynasty ... Show more
At the time of the Sumerians, religion was polytheistic, meaning the people worshiped multiple
gods. They prayed and performed rituals in order to keep the gods happy. When the Persians
conquered an empire, monotheism was introduced through their religion of Zoroastrianism.
Zoroaster founded the ancient Persian religion that influenced modern day Christianity and Judaism.
God came down to Zoroaster many times through the leader of the good forces called Ahura Mazda.
Zoroaster tried to spread the message of Ahura Mazda but few listened. Scribes wrote down
everything Zoroaster said in the sacred text Zend–Avesta. Pleasing God or the gods remained an
important aspect of religion. However, religion changed through the idea of worshiping one God
and the establishment of sacred

Persian Empire Chapter Summaries
The Achaemenid Persian Empire (559– 330 B.C.) As we are introduced to the Great Persian Empire,
we find that Amy Chua's thesis talks about how tolerance was critical in allowing the Persians to not
only establish and prosper their world dominant empire, but to maintain it for over two centuries.
The thesis of the book, Day of Empire by Amy Chua, is about the "study of colossal power and the
conditions needed to maintain it". Not only this, but it discusses "the contest between ethnic "purity"
and ethnic pluralism". Amy Chua argues that The Achaemenid Persian Empire was "one of the first
hyper powers in world history, governing a territory larger than all the ancient empires, including
even Rome's." (Day of Empire pg. 4) Along with this, she argues that the Persian Empire was "one
of the most culturally diverse and religiously open empires in history." (Day of Empire pg. 4)
Therefore, the author argues that The Persian Empire is relevant when discussing large powerful
world authorities with a large size, long period of ruling, and ethnic tolerance it ... Show more
As the king Xerces started ruling, the beginning of the decline of tolerance and the Persian Empire
as a whole began. Although we do not have the exact facts from this late time period, historians have
studied Greek depictions of "increasing brutality and repression of the later Achaemenid kings,
provoking violent uprisings among the subject people." (Day of Empire pg. 21) The pivotal point of
failure occurred when Darius III took the power of the Empire. During this time, "growing
intolerance, unrest, and violence" (Day of Empire pg. 21) was happening amongst the subject
peoples. As more and more people were conquered, the Persian Empire had so many diverse people
that there was no unity amongst the Persian Empire. Soon, the whole empire came to a fall when
Alexander of Macedon began to conquer cities and replace the Persian

The Persian Government System
The government system of the ancient Persians is organized in a manner where there are 24 different
provinces, also known as satrapies. A governor called a "Satrap" would rule over one of these
satrapies. Satraps were appointed by the king to regulate the many duties governing a province
requires. Satraps would do things for their individual province such as enforce law and order, and
collect taxes and tributes. On top of that, they sometimes served alongside Persia`s army
commanders to protect the empire`s frontiers from enemy attack, so being a governor back in
ancient Persia was much more of a commitment than you may have thought. "The basic rule of
governance was based upon loyalty and obedience of each satrapy to the central power, or the king,
and compliance with tax laws." (Boundless World History, 2015) Persian government was a
monarchy system in which the kings had the final say in how things were done within the empire.
The Persian Kings demanded total ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Iranian prophet and reformer Zoroaster founded Zoroastrianism in the sixth century.
Zoroastrians do not worship Zoroaster, but instead believe that he is the prophet of their God. They
believe that through his teachings they may become closer with their God. The Zoroastrians only
believe in one God–Ahura Mazda. They believe he is compassionate, kind, all knowing, powerful,
present everywhere, unchanging, the source of all goodness and happiness, and the creator of life.
Many people make the mistake to believe that the Persians worship Ahura Mazda "The Fire God,"
but really they simply believe that fire is a symbol of their God`s light and wisdom. They do not
worship their God believing it to be a "Fire God." Zoroastrians traditionally pray several times day.
Although, they did focus more on the central ethics of "Good words, Good thoughts, and Good
deeds" because Zoroaster encouraged more focus on these rather than ritual

How Did The Persian Kings Control And Govern The Various...
Griffin Bassman
Professor Frame
Ancient Near East History
12/5/14
How did the Persian kings control/govern the various parts of their realm? Consider at least three
different geographical areas
The origins of Cyrus the Great are rather unclear and highly disputed. Multiple accounts range from
him being the grandson of the Median King Astyages to being the son of a poor Persian family of a
disreputable clan. Although there can be no certainty, as with most everything from the ancient
world, it is widely believed that, by heredity, he became the sub–king of a Persian land called Persis,
under the rule of the Median king Astyages. (Cook 1983, 25–26) He quickly expanded his power by
unifying all of the Persian lands under ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
After conquering Media, Babylonia, and Egypt, for instance, Cyrus The Great and Cambyses II
would make a personal union with the peoples of these countries. They would crown themselves
according to the local customs, and created normal conditions for the development of the economy
and transit trade. They retained, with moderate altercations, the local political structures in these
countries, and offered the peoples a large degree of local self–government. These first two kings
proved to have not created a very well structured empire, however, which led to the multiple
uprisings from 523–521 BCE. (Gershevitch 1985, 502 – 504) From there, Darius I, the King who
proceeded Cambyses II, found a more stable balance by putting in place a more organized
administrative system that would not undergo any fundamental changes up until the demise of the
Achaemenid Empire.
The system that Darius I put in place split the empire up into roughly twenty "satrapies" that would
be governed by "satraps." The satraps were responsible for collecting the annual tribute set by the
king, drafting people to the army, and maintaining justice and security within their satrapy. The
satraps would also have an armed force at their disposal to keep everybody within their satrapy in
line. (Gershevitch 1985, 267) Inspectors would also periodically visit each satrapy to

How Did Alexander's Unable To Develop His Empire
Moreover, Hammond claims that local militias who wished to join Alexander's army became citizen
soldiers, illustrating that regardless of nationality, by fighting along Alexander would incorporate
one into his illustrious empire. Eventually, the army became a way that fused cultures and mixed
background together. The more territories the army conquered, the more Alexander's empire grew,
and by giving incentives to recruits such as incorporating them into the newly formed empire would
help Alexander's ultimate goal of conquest through Asia. The result of Alexander's ambition for
territorial expansion thus reflected upon the constant need for troops and also a reflection of how
diverse cultures and background were consequently integrated into Alexander's empire.
Equivalent to Alexander's integration of diverse cultural groups into his army, his decision to adopt
Persian culture and clothing, his marriage to Parysatis, Stateira, and Roxana further ... Show more
Alexander spent most of his life expanding territories and consolidating his rule over his diverse
cultural subjects. Alexander's conquest overshadowed any plans for unification and racial
integration/assimilation because little, or no, effort was spent in an amalgamation between Greeks
and non–Greeks. It is evident that the ruler included non–Greeks into his army and administration,
but he did so to secure his absolute dominance over his empire. He used the Iranians in the Indian
campaigns to fight native tribes. Persians and other non–Greek troops were used to replenish
increasing mutinous Greek troops that disagreed with his vision. Rather creating a policy fusion or
mixing Greeks and non–Greeks together to create a newly combined superpower, Alexander was
practical, and simply was reacting to the various challenges that arose during his

Byzantium and Sassanid Empire
In the early start of the post–classical era two empires existed that were among the first wave of
post–classical empires. They were the Byzantine Empire and the Persian Sassanid Empire. They
Byzantine Empire was known to be a continuation of the Roman Empire that lasted for one–
thousand years. Although this sounds like an achievement the one–thousand year Byzantine Empire
was not as great as it is expected to be. The Sassanid Empire that lied just east of the Byzantine
Empire, or in present day Iran was also a continuation of previous Persian Empires. During the
post–classical era in Eurasia the Byzantine's and the Sassanid's were two empires that shared
similarities and differences in their political institutions, social structures, dependence on trade and
their economy, and in their declination during the seventh century Common Era. The Byzantines
were a post–classical representation of the Romans while the Sassanid's were a continued empire
from late Persian Dynasties, and both of these continuation empires were comparable in political
structure, social structure, and their declination. The political institution of Byzantium was similar to
Political institution since both were centralized states, however both were not completely the same
since the Byzantine's copied the Romans and the Persians copied the previous dynasties of Persia.
The Byzantine Empire and the Persian Empire did not differ too much in their social structure, both
mainly represented a model for

Comparing The Achaemenid Empire And The Imperial Stability...
Throughout human civilization, it has been invariably true that the ideas and innovations belonging
to particular societies have been adopted by both concurrent and later cultures. This has culminated
in remarkably advanced societies, whose success can be attributed to that of their ancient
counterparts. Much of the prosperity of modern civilization can certainly be accredited to the
Achaemenid Empire, a pluralistic empire founded in 550 BCE. At its peak, it stretched from the
Indus River Valley to the eastern Mediterranean coast. Despite its diversity, the empire remained
politically and societally united throughout its existence. The two major Achaemenid emperors
responsible for the imperial stability and prosperity were Cyrus and ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
To retain the power that emperors would have, Cyrus instituted checks and balances in this political
system; though satraps technically governed the provinces, the emperor had the power to institute
legislation that applied to the entire empire (Farazmand). Furthermore, the emperor would have the
ability to appoint, and if necessary, remove satraps from their positions. This ensured the loyalty of
satraps, as emperors could monitor them. This system of checks and balances resulted in a
politically efficient empire, in the context of both legislation and appointing government officials.
This efficiency encouraged Greeks and Romans to use similar techniques to manage their
governmental systems, contributing to the stability of their respective empires. Romans and Greeks
were heavily influenced by Persian administrative policies, establishing a "satrapy system of local
governorship" (New World Encyclopedia Contributors). With the existence of administrative
divisions, Persians were given province–oriented legislation by their satraps. As a result, however, it
became harder for the general public to communicate directly with high–ranking Persian officials,
resulting in some bureaucratic flaws.
The Achaemenid Empire 's standardization of land and sea routes solidified their bureaucratic
system, inspiring Romans to do the same. The Persian Royal Road was constructed by Darius the
Great in the 5th century BCE. It is considered to be the first

The Narrasian Empire : The Success Of The Persian Empire
The question is not what empire was the most successful but how did they do it. An empire is a
kingdom is so powerful that they can conquer the kingdoms around them who have different
cultures and it becomes multi–ethnic. The Persian empire is said by many to be by far the most
successful. They are known for many different things including creating the road system and
shaping what we know today as the middle east. There are many different reasons the Persians were
able to grow to control so much land and be so large. The basis of the Persian empire's great success
was built on six major elements; Administration, communication, integration, religion, local culture
and lastly, their military. The element of administration comes from Darius I, he took control
eventually after Cyrus II who built the Persian empire, he was a brilliant conquer and he understood
how to run the empire. Darius, I he took over and made the Persian empire into a functioning
organization. He was well known for his love of bureaucracy. He created a set of laws for all of
Persia to abide by but he created a system of states within this with one of his people in charge of
each along with other locals. He allowed the states to create their own local laws, therefore it would
differ depending on what state you resided in. The best example to further explain this idea would
be the way that Jewish people had control on their local law even though they abided to Persia's
basic laws. This can also be connecting

Ap World History Chapter 25 Summary
1. A man named Cyrus overthrew the Persian monarch and became the forefather of the Achaemenid
Persian Empire. He united the Persian tribes and conquered Lydia, as well as Mesopotamia later on
in his rule.
2. The third ruler of the Persian Empire was known as Darius I. He was the creator of the twenty
provinces, in addition to starting the assembly of Persepolis and bestowing government titles to
Persians, rather than to Medes.
3. A ruler of one of the twenty provinces in the Persian Empire was known as a satrap. One of their
main jobs was to collect tribute for the central government and satraps kept their government
position within their family.
4. The Persepolis is a collection of palaces constructed by Darius I and his son Xerxes. Many
celebrations and ceremonies were held ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Zoroastrianism is a type of religion that Darius I and his successors most likely followed. It
originated in ancient Iran, and the single god of goodness named Ahuramazda was believed to be in
a constant struggle against evil.
6. A Greek city–state was known as a polis. Some factors that determined a polis was the acropolis
and agora.
7. Hoplites were created because of the tension between each polis. Hoplites are men armed with
shields and spears who kept in tight formation in order to break the formation of the rival army.
8. The increasing middle class in Greece encouraged the creation of tyrants. They were people who
snatched and retained authority in defiance of the standard political customs. They often weakened
the elite and were backed by the emerging middle class.
9. The government type known as democracy is the system in which all qualifying citizens have
identical political rights, freedoms, and securities. In ancient Greece, only free adult males could be
qualified as citizens.
10. The term sacrifice is defined as giving an important gift to a god or goddess. Sacrifice was
normally performed in order to try and receive a benefit of create a closer relationship with the

Who Is Daniel's Anachrony?
Time – Story World Chronological Order
In time order the most striking feature of the narrative is that the narrative has three anachrony. The
story's anachrony occurs in Daniel 6:10, 1, and 14. In the story anachrony in Daniel 6: 10, Daniel
prayed to God. It is an internal heterodiegetic repeating analepsis. The temporal setting "three times"
introduces the first analepsis "Daniel got down on his knees, prayed, and gave thanks to his God."
This explains Daniel's rebellion against the decree of Darius but his faithfulness to God and
subsequently why God delivered him from the lions. The purpose of this anachrony is for story–
telling drama, to place in the giving of Darius power over power right next to his inability to save
Daniel and his casting of Daniel into the lion's den and to reiterate the consequences or results of
being faithful and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Probably the purpose of this anachrony is for the story telling drama, to place the thought and
actions of Darius next to the surprise and dismay discovery of the deliverance by Daniel by his God.
So, all these analepsis have the characteristics of uniting the story in dramatized way.
Prolepsis occurs in Daniel 6: 14 where the narrator says that Darius set his mind on rescuing without
any reference in the narrative of Darius activities warranting him that he was really ready to deliver
Daniel. This is a mixed homodiegetic completing prolepsis. It serves to interpret Darius actions in
the narrative which point in advance that he is a limited in his powers.
According to Fokkelman, "the narrator is not obliged to provide indications of narrated time, but he
is quite capable of it." The narrator of the story tells us explicitly that Daniel prayed to God, and
Daniel was delivered and his God exalted which serves as an important point of

Under Emperor Darius I: The Persian Empire
Persia was very successful and enduring. Under Emperor Darius I, the Persian Empire grew to be
one of the largest empires ever seen. Although the various lands conquered by Persia played a part
in this, the unity between the people of Persia also contributed to its achievements. NED EFHFH
Emperor Darius I established a bureaucracy, allowing multiple people to possess power. Under his
rule, the empire was divided into twenty different provinces, more commonly known in that time
period as satrapies. Each satrapy was ruled by a satrap, who implemented law and order and
collected taxes. The twenty different satrapies ensured that no region became powerful enough to
overthrow the emperor. Because Persia was such a huge empire, satraps made it easier

Cyrus the Great
Cyrus the Great Builds the Persian Empire by Governing With Toleration and Kindness
The greatest leaders in history often leave behind some sort of legacy. Cyrus the Great was the
founder of the Persian Empire around 500 B.C., which was the largest empire of its time (Cyrus II,
the Great). The empire stretched from ancient Iran, and grew to include an area reaching from
Greece to India (Persian Empire). Cyrus' reign saw some of the first contacts between Persia and
Greece, and helped Persia gain the political power that had once been held by the people of
Mesopotamia (Cyrus, the Great). Cyrus the Great proved to be an effective leader who developed a
strong military that was stationed strategically throughout the empire to stop ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
Persia took over the Medes' kingdom, thus beginning the rise in power of the Persian Empire. Cyrus
established a new capital at Pasargadae to commemorate his victory (Cyrus II, the Great). Cyrus was
very ambitious, so he continued to work on increasing his empire. In 547 B.C. he went to war
against the wealthy King Croesus of Lydia and defeated him at the Battle of Ptyerum. He went on to
capture the Greek city states along the coast of Anatolia. At this point Cyrus' empire was 3,000 miles
wide, but Cyrus was most interested in capturing Babylon because of the power and importance it
represented. In 540 B.C., Cyrus set his sights on Babylon, which had been his ally up to that time.
The people of Babylon were unhappy with King Nabonidus because he did not honor the God
Marduk (Pettman). Without warning, the King left for Arabia, and in his ten–year absence left his
son Belshazzar in charge. King Nabonidus eventually returned to Babylon in 543 B.C. and brought
all of the gods from the surrounding area into Babylon. Then, in the spring of 539 B.C., he tried to
win back his people's favor by celebrating the New Year's rite, but failed to do so (Cyrus II, The
Great). The people of Babylon were ready for a new ruler. The Persians finally attacked while
Babylon was celebrating a festival that was known for its'

Cyrus The Great Research Paper
Cyrus the Great
The life of Cyrus the Great is characterized by his major advancement for human rights, his policies
of politics, and his building projects. First, though, here is a little backroad information. Cyrus the
Great was born around 580 B.C. in Persis, Iran. His name "Cyrus" is the Greek version of
"Khûrvaš", means "sun–like"; "khûr" is a noun and means "sun", while "–vaš", is a suffix for
likeness. He is actually the first leader to be referred as "The Great". Some believe that Cyrus the
Great was a part of a prophecy(Sorat, "Cyrus"). King Astyages, the last emperor of the Median
dynastic empire, which was from 728–550BCE. Astyages was told in a dream that his grandson, the
baby Cyrus, would overthrow him. To not let that happen, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
Even though Cyrus never conquered Egypt, he did conquer the territories on the Egyptian borders.
Cyrus founded the empire as a multi–state empire governed by four capital states: Pasargadae,
Babylon, Susa, and Ecbatana. When he acquired or conquered the territories, he gave a measure of
political independence, and they were ruled by satraps. Satraps are governors, who are usually local,
take full responsibility for the administration, legislation, and cultural activities of each province. He
appointed governor, or satrap, to represent him in each province(Cyrus the Great). Cyrus was also
on the greatest political leaders all time due to the fact that he fought against cruel and mean rulers
but was careful not to become an expansionist only wanting power. In his history of ruling, he
accomplished and worked towards the goals are democracy, freedom of expression, freedom of
choice, freedom of religion, cultural toleration, political feedback mechanism, open trade policy, and
open communications among people in this globe. His ultimate goal was total awareness of other
people. His ethical government is a means of achieving that goal by raising man to a higher state of
total awareness(Cyrus the Great). Cyrus was clearly a leader of great military ability and was a great
character of his rule. The Babylonians, for instance, and even more notably the Assyrians, had

Theme Of The Dictators By Pablo Neruda
In Pablo Neruda's poetry it was evident that symbolism was utilized to strengthen his main theme
throughout his poems, some being "The Dictators", "Hunger in the South", "The Beggars", and "To
the foot from its child", and within these poems the main theme would be shown to be the unfair
distribution of power and wealth in the Chilean society. In the poem "The Dictators" Neruda focuses
on the leaders of the country and comparing their work to the work of those who lived in poverty.
Neruda sets a base for these four poems where they're all centered on the same idea, such as the one
in "The Dictators", comparing those who were part of the upper class, and how they affected the
lives of others. Neruda as a poet found many effective ways to emphasize his opinions and views
within his own community, which is why many people who did not agree with his views found
Neruda to be dangerous and too influential over the public in Chile. Over time as Neruda wrote
more poems, a pattern had been shown through his work. Symbolism was the one of the many
effective ways that Neruda chose to expose the reality of the society, the difference of symbolism to
the other ways was that symbolism forced the reader to think deeper about certain topics and that
would soon make them realize the brutality of what was Chile. "An odor stayed in the cane fields:/
carrion, blood, and a nausea/ of harrowing petals./ Between coconut palms lay the graves, a stilled/
strangulation, a festering surfeit of

How Did The Persian Empire Grow Throughout The Achaemenid...
In order for something to grow, it needs roots. The roots will soon develop and continue to grow. In
relation to this statement, the Achaemenid Empire, in which lasted from 550–330 BC, began as
Cyrus II, otherwise known as Cyrus the Great, had continued to conquer lands and grow his empire.
By doing so, Cyrus II created the most extensive empire that has been dated throughout history.
However, in order for the empire to last, it needed to continue to develop in ways that would benefit
the livelihoods of the people. Based on this, the Achaemenid Empire prospered because the Persians
had created a stable government, in which organized the empire, contributing to the success of the
empire. Likewise, the Achaemenid Empire flourished due to its social class system, which
maintained order throughout the empire, along with the completion of tasks that needed to be
fulfilled in the empire. Furthermore, the Achaemenid Empire continued to thrive and prosper, due to
the myriad amounts of infrastructure that the Persians were able to create and utilize. The Persian
government needed to continually maintain stability throughout the empire, as the empire steadily
grew in populations and territory. This conveys how the Persian Empire grew in diversity. In order
to do so, Persian authority both created an official language and culture, and divided the Empire into
provinces, otherwise known as satrapies. The use of satrapies began during the rule of Darius I, who
established 20

Neolithic Revolution
People have evolved from hunting and gathering to a settled civilization. The transition from a
lifestyle of hunting and gathering to a settlement of civilization was called the Neolithic revolution.
During and after the Neolithic revolution, many factors such as geography, religious beliefs, and
government structures contributed to the success of the land's civilization. Many of those empires
had similarities and differences between the features. Ethiopia and Persia were some of the earliest
civilizations. Ethiopia and Persia had an advantageous geographic location that led to trade and
resources that were used as a source of wealth but had major differences in the government
structures. Before we go into the depth of empire's important ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Ethiopia was divided into semi–independent kingdoms. Each kingdom had its own ruler and the
head of these separate kingdoms was called the "King of Kings" (Clarke 65). Ethiopia was a
uniquely African empire that incorporated much from the outside and yet developed a distinctive
culture of its own in the influence of its government and people (Clarke 67). Ethiopia was isolated
from the rest of the world for fifteen centuries because the Muslims conquered Egypt and cut off
Ethiopia's access to the Red Sea (Clarke 69). Thus, Ethiopia became a feudal kingdom. During this
isolation, "the government was able to keep Ethiopia as a land of wealthy nobility, intricate religious
ceremonies, and elaborate court rituals" (Clarke 69). Unlike Ethiopia, Persian government of the
Achaemenid Empire depended on a balance between central initiative and local administration. The
Achaemenids appointed "governors to serve as agents of the central administration and oversee
affairs in the various regions" (Bentley, Ziegler 169). The administration and taxation were governed
by the satraps. Most of the satraps were Persians, but the government recruited local officials to fill
almost all administrative posts below the level of the satrap. Thus, there was a possibility of the
local official to ally with the local groups and be an independent

The World Of Ancient Persia
In the sixth century B.C, the land that we now call Iran was the center of the largest empire in the
world. The kings of Ancient Persia( such as Cyrus the Great) were the leaders of a great civilization
that made amazing advances in laws, goverment and communication. Founded in 550 B.C by King
Cyrus the Great, the Persian Empire spanned from Egypt in the west to Turkey in the north, and
through Mesopotamia to the Indus River in the east. Unlike most empires at that time, the Persian
kings were benovelent rulers, and allowed a diverse variety of diffrent people with diffrent ethnic
backgrounds. The Persian empire was split into three diffrent empires with three diffrent time
periods but the first empire was called the Achaemenid Empire. It ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The two struggled for control and that humans were frew to chose between good and evil. At death
the humans willl be judged and good deeds will be rewarded and the bad deeds will be punished. In
the book of Daniel, which takes place at the Persian court, the ideas of Heaven and Hell and of
Satan as a force always opposed to God first appear in the Bible. Both of these ideas have become
central to Christianity and Islam as well as Judaism.However others who came from diffrent ethnic
backgrounds were free to live according to their culture and practice their religions as long as they
followed and accepted Persian rule. During the Achaemenid Empire, there was no limit to the kings
power. He could do anything he wanted and the only thing that could stop him was rebellion from
his people. But the king wanted to control his people and protect the weak, so the empire began to
have satrapes. A satrap was usually part of the royal family and carried out the laws of the
goverment and did deeds such as collecting taxes, keeping the roads safe, putting down rebels and
criminals, and enforcing peace. Satraps were also judges of criminal and civil cases in their legion.
At times of war, satraps could act as military commanders. However most satraps were not
trustworthy and in order to keep watch of what they were doing the king sent royal clerks that were
secret spies and they watched the satraps and reported back to the king. King Darius assigned about
20–30 satraps in his

Alexander the Great administration
Alexander governs his administration using techniques of Macedonian and Persian's. The Persian
satrap in Asia enabled Alexander to govern a large amount of territory. In India, he replaced hostile
rulers with rulers loyal to him and increased their territory. He used the Macedonia practice of
founding cities to encourage loyalty with the natives. While he allowed the Persians and Indians to
move up in his administration, he primarily used Macedonians.
Alexander took the throne of Macedonia after the assassination of his father. To secure his position
as King, he moved quickly to establish himself. Upon Philip's death, he had not settled the Greek
city–states leaving them in a state of confusion. His death brought forth internal and ... Show more
In Susa, he appointed Abulites (Persian) as satrap of Susa and appointed his companion Mazars
garrison commander. (A 173) Mazaeus, who had been satrap of Syria under Darius and commander
of the Persians at the battle of Gaugamela, was made satrap and allowed to produce coinage. (B
173) However, Apollodorus of Amphipolis commanded the garrison and Asclepiodorus collected the
taxes (Arr. 3.16.4). To cover all possibilities Alexander left Nicias and Amphipolitan with garrisons.
(B174) The garrisons were Alexander's watchdogs and looked out for Macedonian interest. In this
he created a checks and balances system. Alexander showed that qualified Persians were able to
compete with his Macedonians for leading positions in his administration in Asia.
Alexander changed his standard approach to the organization of his administration in Egypt.
Alexander did not follow the Persian system. Rather, he divided the territory into four sections
watering down its concentration of power. The division between civil and military was to provide
security and prevent any one person from using the mass wealth to challenge his empire. (Hammond
161) Alexander appointed Doloaspis an Egyptian as governor and two of his companion's
commanded garrisons in Memphis and Pelusium. Lycidas a Greek commanded the mercenaries.
(Arrian 3.5) Eugnostus a companion was Secretary of foreign troops, and "of Aeschylus and
Ephippus of Chalcis to superintend the work of the two latter men" (Arrian 3.5)
In India,

Persia And China Similarities
Ancient Persia and China had many similarities and various differences in how they both ruled their
empires. Most of these similarities and differences come from their political and military practices.
They both also share some similarities in their religions. Persia and China have many of the same
techniques in governing their empire, military techniques, and religious practices, while also
distinguishing themselves from one another under mongol rule. One thing both of these ancient
empires had in common was how they ruled their empires. Both of them separated their civilizations
into districts or sections. In Persia the territory was put into twenty–three satrapies, which was an
administrative and taxation district governed by a satrap.

Greco-Persian Wars Research Paper
Have you ever wondered if one event could change history? How big would the change be? The fall
of Persia, was a turning point in history after the Greco–Persian Wars. After the death of Darius, his
son Xerxes ruled until 465 B.C. Xerxes was a cruel but weak king who was also defeated by the
Greeks in the Persian Wars. During Xerxes' reign, the Persian Empire declined. Would the outcome
of the Greco–Persians Wars change the decline of the Persian Empire? The Greco–Persian Wars led
to the rise of the Athenian power. In the wake of the Persian retreat, Athens grew more powerful
against Persia, after the death of Xerxes the Persian Empire lacked that strong hand they needed
against Athens. "The league was no longer an alliance of equal city–states fighting Persia. It had
become a group of city–states controlled by Athens." As stated in the 'Discovering Our Past: A
History of the World' textbook by McGraw–Hill. Revolts and unruly satraps caused serious
economic problems for the empire. Persian taxes became heavier and more oppressive, which led to
economic depression and revolts, which in turn led to more repression, heavier taxes ... Show more
a force of 10, 000 Greek mercenaries, led by Cyrus (a royal prince) survived only to find themselves
stranded in the heart of Persia. In order to get home, they marched and fought their way through a
good part of the Persian Empire. This exploit, known as the March of the Ten Thousand, exposed
the weakness of the Persian Empire. This encouraged Alexander the Great to invade Persia, which
he conquered in a remarkably short time and with a remarkably small army. As stated in the
'Discovering Our Past: A History of the World' textbook by McGraw–Hill, "As Persia weakened, it
became open to outside attacks. In the 300s b.c., Persia could not resist the invasion of an army led
by a young and powerful ruler named Alexander. The Persian Empire ended, and a new Greek
empire emerged that extended beyond even Persia's

Alexander's Vast Accomplishments as a Conquerer
The first matter to consider is what constitutes "greatness". There are no set standards no checklist,
to apply to a person, to determine it they are "great." The simplest way that I could conceive to
decide whether this title should apply to Alexander was to determine if he was, in some way,
superior to the rulers that came before or after his reign. The most obvious place for me to start my
consideration is with Alexander's vast accomplishments as a conquerer. Alexander inherited an
impressive military from his father and a stable kingdom; he also followed his father's plans to
invade Asia. Does this detract from his own accomplishments with the Macedonian army? I would
argue that it does not. It does not matter how large ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Alexander understood truths about society that other's of his time either did not grasp or care to
entertain. He knew to separate battles and keep destruction from the cities. This served a few
purposes. Alexander could award the riches of the conquered lands to his soldier and this gave the
conquered people a reason to respect him. This highlights what is probably the most genius aspect of
Alexander's military prowess; he knew how to separate military strategy from political aims on the
battlefield, but how to exploit his military prowess for his political gain. Alexander's battlefield
skills are exalted in much of the writings that we have, yet it is his uncanny ability to know how far
to push the violence in battle, or when to back down that truly represents his greatness. Alexander
was brilliant in the management of war – he knew which areas to attack, where to lead the battle,
and when to pull back; he was able to determine how best to direct the wars that he waged.
Alexander was able to use his excellent battlefield skills in conjunction with his outmatched
management style to literally pushed the limits of the Macedonian empire to the ends of the known
world. He exhausted his men and resources; faced down mutiny with within his own ranks, twice;
fought off more than one disease, and yet he continued time and again to be successful. Not only did
Alexander achieve a massive empire, he did so in just

Compare And Contrast Persia And China
Comparison of Government in Persia and China After the rise and fall of the earliest civilizations,
some of the very first ancient empires started to emerge over many centuries before the birth of
Christ. Although there are many things that characterize these empires uniquely from each other,
there are still resemblances between them. Despite the fact that both Persia and China were great
empires in two different regions, their governing methods coincide in the systems of organization
and basic infrastructures; but they differed greatly in the beliefs of both the government and people.
As both empires had considerable amounts of land that they ruled over, the method of organizing
their lands held great importance to effectively ruling each empire. First off in Persia, we see King
Darius's acumen in organization through the division of his land into 20 provinces. King Darius
assigns a governor called a satrap, a military commander, and a tax collector to each province to
allow self–governing as long as each province paid their taxes and tributes and remained loyal to the
king. Similarly, during the Qin Dynasty in ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In the Persian Empire, King Darius introduced the usage of standardized currency and the Royal
Road; and Shi Huangdi of the Chinese Empire initiated a centralization program for a highway
system and standardization of measurements, including money. In these two similarities, we see the
reason behind the long–lasting and strong control the two empires had, as both currency and road
systems encouraged trade to flourish–consequently bringing prosperity and peace. Having
consolidated the foundations of an empire, people prospered and grew content under the rule of
powerful kings such as Darius in Persia and Shi Huangdi in China. However, even with such
similarities, there are a two critical differences the two empires

Advantages And Disadvantages Of Athens Democracy
Portfolio paper A Democracy is said to work better and have better outcomes, but a Monarchy was
said to be the most common use of government. However , monarchy of the new times is not
characterized in terms of unlimited political power anymore as it has transformed to a more citizen–
friendly government. A Monarchy is a political system ruled by one individual who usually
increases his role through inheritance. Although the Athens were ruled by a monarchy until the
seventh century B.C.E. it had fallen under the control of its aristocrats."They possessed the best land
and controlled political and religious life by means of a council of nobles, assisted by a board of
nine archons." (Spielvogel 58) Near the end of the seventh century they faced political problems
because of economic issues. Many Athenian farmers wounded up being bought into slavery. These
farmers weren't able to repay loans their aristocrat neighbors loaned to them,"pledging themselves
as collateral." Many cried over and over again asking for no debt and to give the land to the poor.
This seemed like the start of a civil war. This changed the government to a democracy. (Spielvogel
58) Athens had many strengths that contributed to its growth as an economy. For one, It had formed
a cohesive polis, an assembly of political, social, or religious events at a central point where
everyone gets together. Cyrus the Great ruled the largest Empire of his day. He

The Persian Empire: The Five Steps To Civilization Model
The five steps to civilization model occur in the following order: sedentary farmers, surplus of food
and technology, division of labor, urbanization (the only necessary requirement for a group of
people to become a civilization, and culture.
The Persian Empire was one of the first major empires in the ancient world. This empire spanned
from Egypt in the west to Turkey in the north, and through Mesopotamia to the Indus River in the
east. It was established by Cyrus the Great in the 6th century BC.
Sedentary Farmers: The Persians originated as agrarian villagers, nomadic horse and sheep breeders
during the Bronze Age in central Asia south of the Ural Mountains and settled the Fertile Crescent.
They depended on rain fed agriculture. The crops that the Persians grew include wheat, barely,
chickpea, garden pea, cantaloupe, pomegranates, onions, spinach, pistachio ... Show more content
An example of technology used in agriculture is the sakia. This device was used in irrigation. The
sakia or The Persian Wheel was a mechanical device used to raise water from wells or pits. It
consists of buckets fastened to a rope belt about the wheel. Draught animals such as bullocks,
buffaloes or camels operated this device. The Persians also had qanats, which are slanted,
underground canals that transfer water by using gravity.
Division of Labor: There were different positions in the Persian Empire. This includes positions
such as priests, rulers, and soldiers. The Persians differed from other empires due to not having any
slaves. Slavery was banned within the empire. There were also farmers, laborers, merchants, and
landlords.
Urbanization: An example of urbanization in the Persian Empire is Persepolis. The city was also
known as Parsa. The construction of Persepolis began at the site in 518 BCE under the rule of King
Darius the Great. Darius made Parsa the new capital of the Persian

The Rise And Development Of Ancient Persia
Ancient Persia also known as the Achaemenid Empire is known to be one of the greatest empires in
ancient history. It was viewed as the first "humane, equal and religiously tolerant empire." It was
made up of several different languages, races, religions and cultures. The empire would become
large enough to stretch through three continents. The rise and development of Persia revolved
around the rule of Cyrus the Great and Darius the Great. Cyrus was a military and political genius
that would go on to rule the largest empire in the ancient world. Ancient Persia began to rise in 550
BC when Cyrus the Great defeated Medes and the Median Empire and united the Medes and
Persians. Cyrus than began the creation of the Persian Empire and became its first ruler. From then
on, the Persian army, under the rule of Cyrus the Great and his successors, started many wars and
became one of the largest and most powerful ancient empires. His first successor would be his son
Cambyses II who would rule for a short time. Under his rule the Persian empire soon became
powerful enough to easily take over Egypt and Mesopotamia which is why they have some things in
common. The beginning of the the rise of this great empire starts in 539 BC when Babylon is
conquered. Babylon was at the time viewed as the "ancient world's capital of scholarships and
science." So, this was great victory for Cyrus the Great and the Persian empire as a whole. "In
Babylon, the people were tired of internal conflict and the

Who Is Darius The Great Dbq
IEP10 #36 Rebecca Darius the Great Imagine frequent warfare is ongoing in your country, and
everyday hundreds of thousands of people are dying. This is what happened in Persia, the largest
empire ever established around 500 BCE. No leaders could govern the entire empire, but there was
one person out of many who reinstated order in Persia. His name was Darius I. Darius created a
permanent army composed of paid soldiers, and brought political stability to Persia through the
division of land into regions and the development of the Royal Roads. The emperor before Darius
was Cambyses II, who was described as a despot and an aberrant man. In 522 BC, he suddenly died
on his way back home from Egypt, which left the Persian Empire without a leader. Therefore,
people began the revolution for their discontent about the government. Wars continued to spread,
and Darius won the people by his strong army. The core of his army was called Ten Thousand
Immortals. All of the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
"So Darius son of Hystaspes was made king, and the whole of Asia, which Cyrus first and
Cambyses after him had conquered, was subject to him, except the Arabians; these did not yield as
of slaves to the Persians, but were united to them by friendship, having given Cambyses passage
into Egypt, which the Persians could not enter without the consent of the Arabians." Herodotus once
wrote. To establish better control, he divided the empire into regions. He divided Persia into 20
areas. Governors called satraps governed the regions in Darius's name. Though the satraps had local
authority, they still had to obey his rules. To assure that all the satraps were loyal, Darius sent
officials called King's Eyes and King's Ears to observe the satraps. If governors received negative
reports, they would get punished or replaced. In this way, Darius ruled the entire empire perfectly
and ensure that none of the regions became too

Persian Empire Dbq Essay
The Persian Empire overtook the weakening Babylonian empire under the rule of Cyrus and then
expanded under his successors. The Persian Empire was unique in its ruling over the people that it
had conquered, especially under the rule of Cyrus and Darius.1 In order to ensure that the empire
would continue to flourish, in spite of its expansion and increasing size, the Persian rulers integrated
the local cultures and peoples, which benefitted both the Empire and those they conquered.2
Although they were a conquered people, the Mesopotamian people, including and maybe especially
Babylon, profited and prospered economically and culturally and enjoyed greater privileges
politically then they could have hoped for under the ruler ship of other conquerors. ... Show more
Babylon especially benefitted in this regard. Aramaic, which was the language of Babylon, became
the language used for business and government.14 Babylon also saw itself flourish culturally as it
became known as a center for art, mathematics, and astronomy.15 Additionally, religious practices
were allowed to continue, including such events as the Jews being allowed to rebuild the temple in
Jerusalem.16 Cyrus left behind evidence of this religious tolerance in the form of the Cyrus
Cylinder. On this cylinder, written in Babylonian cuneiform between 539–538 B.C., Cyrus had
written "the gods who dwelt there I returned to their home and let them move into an eternal
dwelling. All their people I collected and brought them back to their homes" on line 32 of the
cylinder. Many scholars have taken as evidence of Cyrus allowance of other religion practices and
of peoples to return.17 Furthermore, others believe this is an historical reference to Cyrus allowing
the Jews to rebuild the temple and that this was during the same period that they returned to
Jerusalem, as the text also references the return of people to their homes.18 There are additional
references of Cyrus making offerings to the multiple gods that were worshipped at the time and
restoring shrines that had previously been destroyed.19 This tolerance of

Compare And Contrast Political And Persian Political System
There are precious few similarities between the political systems of the two civilizations; in fact
they were basically opposite of each other. The Persian Empire had been ruled by a King from a
central location; but the size of the Empire was so large that he wasn't able to effectively rule alone.
He got a number of governors called Satraps to rule in his stead in different provinces. The Satraps
were almost always Persian, but he did let the local officials to be chosen from local people with
local language and customs. To keep insurrections or treason from happening, he employed a secret
police system known as the "eyes and ears of the King" that gave him information of events in the
far reaches of his Empire. The Greek poleis were each

Why Did the Achaemenid Empire Fall? Essay
Why did the Achaemenid Empire Fall?
Throughout time there have been a number of Persian Empires, but none of them can compare to the
great Achaemenid Empire, which ruled between 550 to 330BC. The Achaemenid Empire is known
as the largest empire in Ancient history which stretched out approximately 8 million km² at the
height of its power. So how does an Empire so large and with such great power collapse? Was it
struggle for power, which every new king had to suffer after the death of Darius the Great? Or was it
because of corruption of the ministers and Satraps that made the empire decline. Maybe it could
have been the invading Greek forces lead by Phillip the II of Macedon and his son Alexander the
Great or are all these to blame? ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
For the next few years he would lay siege and conquer many cities and countries and gains control
of a vast majority of Asia Minor and Egypt. After Alexander had conquered Babylon he set his
sights on Persia. He took Susa, one of the capitals and Persepolis the ceremonial capital. Alexander
had set his sights on taking Darius III and pursed him into Media then Parthia. In the year 330BC,
Darius was taken prisoner by the Bactrian Satrap Bessus who had Darius stabbed as Alexander
approached, He declared himself the new king under the name of Artaxerxes V. Alexander gave
Darius a proper burial next to his Achaemenid ancestors and proclaims himself the rightful
successor. Though Bessus proclaims himself as King of the Empire, he had no relations to anyone of
the royal family, therefore it is generally accepted that the death of Darius the III marked the end of
Achaemenid Empire. Much of the remaining Empire falls to Alexander or gains independence for
themselves. Alexander succeeded in conquering the Achaemenid Empire because of his great
tactical prowess on the battlefield making him and his army a formidable enemy for the generals of
the Empire. He conquers many cities and state swiftly, many were willing to submit after seeing
what they had done to other armies. In conquering the cities he began to merge Greek language,
Greek Culture and Greek population with these conquered areas making the original culture of
Persia decline.
After the rule of King Darius the I (known

Write An Essay On The Persians Battle
The Battle The Persians staged a preemptive defensive posture in the plains of Gaugamela. The
recently manicured landscape was ideal for the implementation of the scythed chariots. They were
placed up front with a tiny group of fighters. There were a left and right wing of mixed fighters from
throughout the land. The front forces led the attack followed shortly by an element that expanded to
attack the left flank of the Macedonians. Darius was at the center, engulfed by his finest fighters, a
Persian King tradition. On the right were Greek mercenaries and the Persian Horse Guards with the
famous Immortals at the right and center. The Macedonians were divided into two groups,
Alexander directly commanding the right, and Parmenion on the left. Alexander fought with his
chosen elite element and light cavalry. Parmenion's orders were to maneuver in the left quadrant,
while his commanding officer delivered the calculated blow from the right. From there it moved the
Phalanx, which was placed on a double line. The ratio increased from that of Issus at 2:1 to 5:1, and
eclipsing the Phalanx front by over a mile. The rear formation of mercenaries is to attack any
opposition that followed. Alexander's reassessed plan consisted of engaging Darius' right flanks
creating a gap in order to conduct a strategic strike in the center. His plan ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Another factor was the manicured plains Darius prepared for his chariot operations. The further
Alexander moved disabled the chances of an effective attack. Darius ordered the chariots forward.
Alexander's men mastered a new technique to deny the devastating Persian scythes chariots attack.
They formed an "E" formation encircling the chariots while driving sarissas (a long spear of
approximately 4.30 meters) into the advancing vehicles neutralizing the incumbent

Political and Economic Persian and Greek Comparison Essays
Persia and Greece were beautiful and prosperous empires and where the most influential of their
time. In this essay I will talk about the two main empires' political structures and their economy and
I will also state similarities and differences between the two empires. The two empires' political
structures might have varied greatly but their economies were very similar. Even though they had
differences and had major battles they were still the ideal empires of their time. The Persians had a
very good government. Before Persia became known as the largest empire in the world in its time
period they were not unified. It wasn't until 522 B.C. that the Persian Empire became unified.
Emperor Darius accomplished the real unification of this ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
Therefore replacing barter with the exchange of money. Greece was a very high–class civilization,
where the government was based on city–states. Perhaps their greatest invention of all was the form
of government they came up with, which we still use today–democracy. However these Greek
democracies are nothing like our democracy today. The probably most well known ruler of Greece
was Alexander the Great. He was the leader of Macedonia, the city–state that took control over
Greece, and he eventually gained control over Greece as a whole. Alexander the Great was probably
the best leader of all time in Greece. He conquered new lands, but he was the first person to adopt
the new land's customs, instead of forcing his customs on the new territory. This is why many of the
civilizations he conquered actually were glad he took them over. He also encouraged his soldiers to
marry the women from the new territories to show cultural involvement. The Greek economy was
based off of agriculture. They were also colonized to somewhat like the states we have in America.
Their main crops and trade products were grapes, olives, and wine. The Greek commerce and trade
by sea is what made all of the Greek city–states as wealthy and important as they were. The Greeks
were often called "The Masters of the Mediterranean" because of their skillful seafaring.
The Greek and Persian civilization had a lot of similarities and

Intrusion In The Awakening
Intrusion
In the story, the narrator is somewhat intrusive giving a logical clue in verse 10 and presenting every
action in the verse in a pause which slows the actions and activities in the verse. Another intrusion is
presented in verse 28. The narrator interrupts the narrative with background information or
comments to the implied reader. The narrator appears more covert, giving more information to the
character Darius as Cyrus the Persian. The narrator then impresses upon the implied reader the
identity or other reference to Darius.
Distance
Concerning distance the narrator reports both the actions of the characters and their thoughts. The
internal thoughts of the characters, particularly Darius and the administrations and satraps are
reported on, while that of Daniel is not reported on. We are only presented with exaltation of God
with prior intention. The internal reasoning of characters is declared though the rehearsal of the
action not shown by the narrator. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
However, it is not difficult to determine. The story seems to turn things upside down. It focalizes
with short introduction about the activities or powers of Darius by showing that Darius appoints
Daniel as one of the three administrators to oversee the kingdom and then planned to set him over
all the other administrators. The narrative then moves inward toward tableau statements and then
outward as the story defocalizes. Darius seems to be receptive and willing to be worshipped king.
The administrators and satraps on the other hand seems to be crafty planned to eliminate Daniel and
succeed by praying on the intelligence of Darius. Daniel is presented as an innocent man and a man
prayerful and faithful to God. God then uses the opportunity in bringing deliverance to Daniel. God
is presented as the hero. There is good and there is evil and there is a clear portrayal that God rescue
His faithful and loyal servants. He is to be

Alexander's Great Accomplishments
Alexander`s military expertise was introduced when he commanded the left wing in the Battle of
Chaeronea in 338 B.C.E. In 336, in the result of Philip II death Alexander inherited his title of king
of Macedon. After titled king Alexander got rid of all threats to his throne. When chosen king of
Macedon he did not acquire command of the Corinthian League immediately. Athens and southern
Greek states planned to lead the league under Demosthenes. Instantly showing leader–like qualities
the League entrusted Alexander with absolute powers to campaign against Persia. He lacked wealth,
so needed the riches of Persia to be able to maintain the force assembled by Philip. They crossed
Asia Minor and sacked cities to gain wealth. After he freed a Greek ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
At Arbela, Alexander encountered the Persians, this was the Battle of Gaugamela. At the end, the
Persian army fell, and into the Kurdish mountains Alexander followed Darius. As they pursued
Darius they found Babylonia, Alexander then decided to desert the chase. He probed the all the
riches of the land Darius ditched. Later, Alexander defeated the superb palace of Susa and took their
riches. Next, he departed to the capital of the Persian Empire, Persepolis. Alexander believed
Persepolis was their worst enemy among the cities of Asia. Also, they were the wealthiest city.
Alexander sacked and burned the city to stop its uprising, and as a consequence for the demolition
of Athens. Then he went to Darius's last capital, Ecbatana, where he left the Macedonian general in
command of the seized valuables. Alexander set out in search for Darius. Darius and his eastern
satraps have ran off past the Caspian Gates. The satraps had assassinated Darius when Alexander got
to them, he demanded a royal funeral. As Darius's inheritor and avenger, Alexander according to
Persian principles, maltreated them. He became the Persian king, started to dress in Persian royal
clothing and embraced the Persian court ceremonials. Like anywhere else, he placed officials in his
management. But, he retained his place of the head of the Corinthian League with regard to the
Greek ambassadors. Alexander professed that he was the King of Asia and

Ancient Iran Social Structure Essay
Ancient Iran, 1000–486 BCE
Key Points
Location
Irrigation, irrigation channels
Objects of trade Medes
Cyrus
Social Structure
Cambyses
Darius I
Define satrap & duty
The royal court
Define Persepolis & use
Zoroastrianism
Susa Notes About Key Points
Links western Asia with southern and central Asia. Surrounded by mountain ranges, a desert, and
bodies of water.
Irrigation allowed people to move down from mountains into valleys...leading to agriculture.
Underground irrigation channels prevented evaporation
Mineral resources–Copper, tin, iron, gold, silver. Crafted goods–textiles, carpets
First to achieve complex level of political organization. Influenced by Mesopotamia. Extended ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Access to raw materials and markets abroad. Building stone (fine marble), clay
Surrounded by: medt. Sea, atl. Ocean, alps, Syrian and sahara desert.
Grain (barley), olive trees, grapevines
Timber–northern Aegean, gold–anatolia, copper–cyprus, tin–west medt., grain–black sea, Egypt, &
sicily
After destruction of mycenaean palace–states, poverty struck and Greece was isolated from rest of

world
Created first true alphabet; influenced by Phoenicia
Farming replaced herding, and families were able to work on previously unused land. Developing
skills in other areas(crafts)
(city–state), consists of urban center and rural territory it controls. Ex)Athens offered refuge in an
emergency open area where citizens came together to participate in government heavily armored
Greek infantrymen who fought in close packed phalanx formation expanding population–many
communities sent people abroad to establish independent colonies. Some left voluntarily, some
where threatened their life if returned.–this spread Greek culture to many places term Greeks used
for someone who seized and held power in violation of the normal procedures and traditions of the
community.
Allowed for more rapid exchanges of goods, better record keeping, and storage of wealth.
Stimulated

Alexander The Great: Alexandros III Macedonon
Alexander, commonly known as "Alexandros III Philippou Makedonon" and "Alexander the Great"
lived from 356–323 B.C. was the son of Phillip II of Macedon and Olympias. The combination of
his bravery and negotiation skills paved the way for his success and numerous victories. His
conquests and interactions with people throughout his life left a mark on the everyday world we live
in today. Alexander's first conquest was in Persia in 334 B.C. He invaded Persia with a large army
filled with dedicated men in hopes of obtaining money and restoring Greek cities that had been
dominated by the Persians. He knew his chance of victory was higher since the Persian empire was
starting to grow weak. He also wanted victory in honor of his late father who ... Show more content
Surprisingly, he did not have to fight for Marathus and Aradus because the cities willing gave
themselves to be ruled under his power. While trying to conquer Tyre, he endured many barriers
which frustrated Alexander. They did not allow him on the island and the people of the islands hid
themselves from him in an act of rebellion. Alexander then built a land bridge to have access to the
island. The people revolted and tried to fight his army with fail. Alexander was victorious again in
July of 332. He raided the island violently and punished the people for not being obedient by selling
them into slavery. Alexander conquered Eygpt and was welcomed as their ruler by the Persian satrap
and people of Eygpt in November 332. He was viewed in a pharaoh–like way, and he was presented
a crown to illustrate the power he now had in the region. He spent the winter of 332–331 in Eygpt.
During that time, he discovered the city Alexandria and his supposed origins. Alexandria was
located by the Nile and grew to be a successful and well respected city. Alexander also claimed to be
the son of Zeus. He told his followers that a well–known oracle told

The Priest And The Great King By Lisbeth S. Fried
The Priest and the Great King by Lisbeth S. Fried faces the question as to how the Persians dealt
with the Jews after the absorption of Judea from the conquest of Babylon. The texts from Hebrew
sources suggested the Persian had a sense of reverence for the Jews which was unlike the others.
Attempting to use sources other than the Tanach is difficult as there is not much in the way of
Persian sources concerning the Jews and Judea but there is some.
The province of Judea was called Yehud under Persian rule, and may have been called such under
Babylonian rule. The primary source of Persian kindness to the Jews was found in the proclamation
made by Cyrus. While there is a Persian record of the decree, the actual language is different than
how it is shown in the Tanach. The Cyrus cylinder does not suggest Yehud was singled out as being
freed from slavery nor were they singled out as being permitted to rebuild temples which were
destroyed under Babylonian rule .
All of this opens the door for Frieds's main question, how did Yehud's government change from the
time of conquest under Babylon to the arrival of Alexander the Great. Was it due to some autonomy
given by the king or was it in spite of rules placed by the king, was this change unique; was there a
change at all? The physical damage was minimal, but the psychological damage caused by the
destruction of the temple and the exile of the priests, royal family, and other like individuals was
significant. After Babylon was

Persian Empire Research Paper
The ancient world was a time of great civilisations and greater rulers, and today it is those of Greece
and Rome that are remembered. But they were not alone in their military conquests and vast
empires; there were many equal to, or perhaps even greater, than them, and it is important not to
overlook the achievements of these peoples who have helped to shape history. The Persian Empire is
one such of these civilisations, rising to prominence in the mid sixth century BCE and enduring for
two hundred years, a small amount of time in which it conquered an impressive amount of territory.
At its height, it controlled a huge swathe of land centred in modern–day Iran, stretching as far north
as the Russian border, as far south as Egypt, and as far ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The efficiency of the Persian Empire's rule over a large area inhabited by people of various different
cultures and traditions was one of its most significant achievements. To maintain order, the empire
was split into approximately twenty areas known as satrapies, each ruled by a satrap, generally a
local of the area. This governmental system enabled large–scale taxation to take place, as each
satrap collected money from his area and sent it back to the emperor, something which would have
been near impossible without these regional leaders; collection of tax provided a constant flow of
money to fund the Persian Empire and its operations. Persia also maintained cohesion in its empire
through implementation of a common language for use in all government documents, the
development of standardised weights and official coinage, and the introduction of a single set of
laws to govern the empire in its entirety. Perhaps the most notable achievement of the Persians was
the Royal Road, a highway built by Darius I that allowed prompt communication and intelligence
gathering, and stretched approximately three thousand kilometres across the Persian Empire. With
fresh messengers and horses waiting at stations along this road, a message could be delivered in
seven days where it might formerly have taken three months. The organisation of the Empire meant
that it remained unified and connected with the

Cyrus Strengths

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Brooke Curtis

More from Brooke Curtis (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Cyrus Strengths