SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 12
ITEM ANALYSIS
Dr. Rajasree
Lecturer in General Education
K.U.C.T.E,Aryad,Alappuzha
ITEM ANALYSIS
 Item analysis is a statistical technique which is
used for selecting and rejecting the items of
the test on the basis of their difficulty value and
discriminating power
 Item analysis is done for obtaining: Difficulty
value (D.V) Discriminative power (D.P)
OBJECTIVES OF ITEM ANALYSIS:
To select appropriate items for the final draft
To obtain the information about the difficulty value(D.V) of all the
items
 To provide discriminatory power (D.I) to differentiate between
capable and less capable examinees for the items
To provide modification to be made in some of the items
To prepare the final draft properly ( easy to difficult items
STEPS OF ITEM ANAYSIS:
Arrange the scores in descending order
Separate two sub groups of the test papers
Take 27% of the scores out of the highest scores and 27% of the
scores falling at bottom
Count the number of right answer in highest group (R.H) and count
the no of right answer in lowest group (R.L)
Count the non-response (N.R) examinees
Difficulty value (D.V):
“ The difficulty value of an item is defined as the proportion or
percentage of the examinees who have answered the item correctly” -
J.P. Guilford
The formula for difficulty value (D.V )
D.V = (R.H + R.L)/ (N.H + N.L)
R.H – rightly answered in highest group, R.L - rightly answered in
lowest group N.H – no of examinees in highest group, N.L - no of
examinees in lowest group
In case non-response examinees available means, The formula for
difficulty value (D.V)
D.V = (R.H + R.L)/ [(N.H + N.L)- N.R]
R.H – rightly answered in highest group
R.L - rightly answered in lowest group
N.H – no of examinees in highest group
N.L - no of examinees in lowest group
N.R – no of non-response examinees
Discrimination index (D.I):
“ Index of discrimination is that ability of an item on the basis of
which the discrimination is made between superiors and inferiors ” –
Blood and Budd (1972)
Types of discrimination index (D.I):
 Zero discrimination or No discrimination
 Positive discrimination
 Negative discrimination
Zero discrimination or No discrimination :
Zero discrimination or No discrimination: The item of the test is answered
correctly or know the answer by all the examinee’s An item is not answered
correctly by any of the examinee
Positive discrimination index:
Positive discrimination index :An item is correctly answered by superiors and
is not answered correctly by inferiors. The discriminative power range from
+1 to -1.
Negative discrimination index:
Negative discrimination index :An item is correctly answered by inferiors and
is not answered correctly by superiors.
The formula for discrimination index(D.I)
D.I = (R.H - R.L)/ (N.H or N.L)
R.H – rightly answered in highest group
R.L - rightly answered in lowest group
N.H – no of examinees in highest group
N.L - no of examinees in lowest group
General guidelines for discriminating index (D.I)
According to Ebel , D.I Item Evaluation
≥0.40 -Very good items
 0.30 - 0.39 Reasonably good but subject to improvement
 0.20 – 0.29 Marginal items , need improvement
<0.19 Poor items . Rejected or revised
D.V Item Evaluation
0.20 – 0.30 Most difficult
0.30 - 0.40 Difficult
0.40 – 0.60 Moderate difficult
0.60 – 0.70 Easy
0.70 – 0.80 Most easy
Relationship between difficulty value and discrimination power
 Both (D.V & D.I) are complementary not contradictory to each other
Both should be considered in selecting good items
 If an item has negatively discriminate or zero discrimination, is to be
rejected whatever be the difficulty value
THANK YOU

More Related Content

What's hot

Item and Distracter Analysis
Item and Distracter AnalysisItem and Distracter Analysis
Item and Distracter Analysis
Sue Quirante
 
Lesson 4 analysis of test results
Lesson 4 analysis of test resultsLesson 4 analysis of test results
Lesson 4 analysis of test results
Carlo Magno
 
Selection types of objective test
Selection types of objective testSelection types of objective test
Selection types of objective test
enylisac25
 
Item analysis and validation
Item analysis and validationItem analysis and validation
Item analysis and validation
KEnkenken Tan
 

What's hot (20)

Item analysis report
Item analysis report Item analysis report
Item analysis report
 
Item analysis ppt
Item analysis pptItem analysis ppt
Item analysis ppt
 
Quantitative Item Analysis
Quantitative Item Analysis Quantitative Item Analysis
Quantitative Item Analysis
 
Item analysis
Item analysisItem analysis
Item analysis
 
Item analysis
Item analysisItem analysis
Item analysis
 
Test interpretation
Test interpretationTest interpretation
Test interpretation
 
Item and Distracter Analysis
Item and Distracter AnalysisItem and Distracter Analysis
Item and Distracter Analysis
 
Item analysis and validation
Item analysis and validation Item analysis and validation
Item analysis and validation
 
Qualitative Analysis of Test Items
Qualitative Analysis of Test ItemsQualitative Analysis of Test Items
Qualitative Analysis of Test Items
 
Lesson 4 analysis of test results
Lesson 4 analysis of test resultsLesson 4 analysis of test results
Lesson 4 analysis of test results
 
New item analysis
New item analysisNew item analysis
New item analysis
 
Item analysis
Item analysis Item analysis
Item analysis
 
Selection types of objective test
Selection types of objective testSelection types of objective test
Selection types of objective test
 
Percentile and percentile rank
Percentile and percentile rankPercentile and percentile rank
Percentile and percentile rank
 
Basic Concepts of Teaching, Evaluation, Measurement, And Tests.
Basic Concepts of Teaching, Evaluation, Measurement, And Tests.Basic Concepts of Teaching, Evaluation, Measurement, And Tests.
Basic Concepts of Teaching, Evaluation, Measurement, And Tests.
 
Item analysis
Item analysisItem analysis
Item analysis
 
Item analysis and validation
Item analysis and validationItem analysis and validation
Item analysis and validation
 
Tools and techniques of guidance
Tools and techniques of guidance Tools and techniques of guidance
Tools and techniques of guidance
 
Interpretation of test Scores
Interpretation of test ScoresInterpretation of test Scores
Interpretation of test Scores
 
Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory
Classical Test Theory and Item Response TheoryClassical Test Theory and Item Response Theory
Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory
 

Viewers also liked

Metrics, Logs, Transaction Traces, Anomaly Detection at Scale
Metrics, Logs, Transaction Traces, Anomaly Detection at ScaleMetrics, Logs, Transaction Traces, Anomaly Detection at Scale
Metrics, Logs, Transaction Traces, Anomaly Detection at Scale
Sematext Group, Inc.
 
Game Over - HTML5 Games
Game Over - HTML5 GamesGame Over - HTML5 Games
Game Over - HTML5 Games
Guido Garcia
 
Cedar Ridge Weekly Report
Cedar Ridge Weekly ReportCedar Ridge Weekly Report
Cedar Ridge Weekly Report
clstutts
 
Creating a personal narrative
Creating a personal narrativeCreating a personal narrative
Creating a personal narrative
Emily Kissner
 
Incident Command: The far side of the edge
Incident Command: The far side of the edgeIncident Command: The far side of the edge
Incident Command: The far side of the edge
Fastly
 
Ahg microsoft stream_insight_queries
Ahg microsoft stream_insight_queriesAhg microsoft stream_insight_queries
Ahg microsoft stream_insight_queries
Steve Xu
 

Viewers also liked (20)

Metrics, Logs, Transaction Traces, Anomaly Detection at Scale
Metrics, Logs, Transaction Traces, Anomaly Detection at ScaleMetrics, Logs, Transaction Traces, Anomaly Detection at Scale
Metrics, Logs, Transaction Traces, Anomaly Detection at Scale
 
Introduction to ICS/SCADA security
Introduction to ICS/SCADA securityIntroduction to ICS/SCADA security
Introduction to ICS/SCADA security
 
vodQA Pune - Innovations in Testing - Agenda
vodQA Pune - Innovations in Testing - AgendavodQA Pune - Innovations in Testing - Agenda
vodQA Pune - Innovations in Testing - Agenda
 
Fluentd at HKOScon
Fluentd at HKOSconFluentd at HKOScon
Fluentd at HKOScon
 
Santo Rosario Completo
Santo Rosario CompletoSanto Rosario Completo
Santo Rosario Completo
 
Powerupcloud - Corporate Deck
Powerupcloud - Corporate DeckPowerupcloud - Corporate Deck
Powerupcloud - Corporate Deck
 
CF Summit: Skilling Up
CF Summit: Skilling UpCF Summit: Skilling Up
CF Summit: Skilling Up
 
Game Over - HTML5 Games
Game Over - HTML5 GamesGame Over - HTML5 Games
Game Over - HTML5 Games
 
Tic’s y enfermería
Tic’s y enfermeríaTic’s y enfermería
Tic’s y enfermería
 
Open Development
Open DevelopmentOpen Development
Open Development
 
Tech Chat – What's New in Sumo Logic
Tech Chat – What's New in Sumo LogicTech Chat – What's New in Sumo Logic
Tech Chat – What's New in Sumo Logic
 
Cedar Ridge Weekly Report
Cedar Ridge Weekly ReportCedar Ridge Weekly Report
Cedar Ridge Weekly Report
 
IBM Bluemix OpenWhisk: IBM Seminar 2016, Tokyo, Japan: The Future of Cloud Pr...
IBM Bluemix OpenWhisk: IBM Seminar 2016, Tokyo, Japan: The Future of Cloud Pr...IBM Bluemix OpenWhisk: IBM Seminar 2016, Tokyo, Japan: The Future of Cloud Pr...
IBM Bluemix OpenWhisk: IBM Seminar 2016, Tokyo, Japan: The Future of Cloud Pr...
 
Creating a personal narrative
Creating a personal narrativeCreating a personal narrative
Creating a personal narrative
 
JavaOne 2017 - Choosing a NoSQL API and Database to Avoid Tombstones and Drag...
JavaOne 2017 - Choosing a NoSQL API and Database to Avoid Tombstones and Drag...JavaOne 2017 - Choosing a NoSQL API and Database to Avoid Tombstones and Drag...
JavaOne 2017 - Choosing a NoSQL API and Database to Avoid Tombstones and Drag...
 
An Introduction to event sourcing and CQRS
An Introduction to event sourcing and CQRSAn Introduction to event sourcing and CQRS
An Introduction to event sourcing and CQRS
 
Incident Command: The far side of the edge
Incident Command: The far side of the edgeIncident Command: The far side of the edge
Incident Command: The far side of the edge
 
Joomladagen 2015 Joomla Performance
Joomladagen 2015 Joomla PerformanceJoomladagen 2015 Joomla Performance
Joomladagen 2015 Joomla Performance
 
SIG-NOC Tools Survey
SIG-NOC Tools SurveySIG-NOC Tools Survey
SIG-NOC Tools Survey
 
Ahg microsoft stream_insight_queries
Ahg microsoft stream_insight_queriesAhg microsoft stream_insight_queries
Ahg microsoft stream_insight_queries
 

Similar to Item analysis

Item Development and Analysis WorksheetStudent Name.docx
Item Development and Analysis WorksheetStudent Name.docxItem Development and Analysis WorksheetStudent Name.docx
Item Development and Analysis WorksheetStudent Name.docx
sleeperfindley
 
item analysis.pptx education pnc item analysis
item analysis.pptx education pnc item analysisitem analysis.pptx education pnc item analysis
item analysis.pptx education pnc item analysis
swatisheth8
 
Analyzing and Using Test Item Data
Analyzing and Using Test Item DataAnalyzing and Using Test Item Data
Analyzing and Using Test Item Data
jasper gaboc
 

Similar to Item analysis (19)

Item Analysis
Item Analysis Item Analysis
Item Analysis
 
Item analysis by Shabbir Sohal
Item analysis by Shabbir SohalItem analysis by Shabbir Sohal
Item analysis by Shabbir Sohal
 
educatiinar.pptx
educatiinar.pptxeducatiinar.pptx
educatiinar.pptx
 
item analysics
item analysicsitem analysics
item analysics
 
Item Analysis.pptx
Item Analysis.pptxItem Analysis.pptx
Item Analysis.pptx
 
Item Development and Analysis WorksheetStudent Name.docx
Item Development and Analysis WorksheetStudent Name.docxItem Development and Analysis WorksheetStudent Name.docx
Item Development and Analysis WorksheetStudent Name.docx
 
Language Assessement
Language AssessementLanguage Assessement
Language Assessement
 
Item Analysis
Item AnalysisItem Analysis
Item Analysis
 
Item analysis2
Item analysis2Item analysis2
Item analysis2
 
item analysis.pptx education pnc item analysis
item analysis.pptx education pnc item analysisitem analysis.pptx education pnc item analysis
item analysis.pptx education pnc item analysis
 
Analyzing and Using Test Item Data
Analyzing and Using Test Item DataAnalyzing and Using Test Item Data
Analyzing and Using Test Item Data
 
Improving the test items
Improving the test itemsImproving the test items
Improving the test items
 
Item Analysis
Item AnalysisItem Analysis
Item Analysis
 
Administering, analyzing, and improving the test or assessment
Administering, analyzing, and improving the test or assessmentAdministering, analyzing, and improving the test or assessment
Administering, analyzing, and improving the test or assessment
 
TEST ITEM ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 2022.ppt
TEST ITEM ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 2022.pptTEST ITEM ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 2022.ppt
TEST ITEM ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 2022.ppt
 
CHAPTER 6 Assessment of Learning 1
CHAPTER 6 Assessment of Learning 1CHAPTER 6 Assessment of Learning 1
CHAPTER 6 Assessment of Learning 1
 
13-itemanalysis-161127124647.pptx
13-itemanalysis-161127124647.pptx13-itemanalysis-161127124647.pptx
13-itemanalysis-161127124647.pptx
 
assessment and evaluation in math8(finals).pptx
assessment and evaluation in math8(finals).pptxassessment and evaluation in math8(finals).pptx
assessment and evaluation in math8(finals).pptx
 
ITEM ANALYSIS.pptx
ITEM ANALYSIS.pptxITEM ANALYSIS.pptx
ITEM ANALYSIS.pptx
 

More from Bimel Kottarathil (20)

Pulmonary neoplasm final
Pulmonary neoplasm    finalPulmonary neoplasm    final
Pulmonary neoplasm final
 
Peptic ulcer disease final
Peptic ulcer disease final Peptic ulcer disease final
Peptic ulcer disease final
 
Rabies
RabiesRabies
Rabies
 
Infections of the urinary tract final
Infections of the urinary tract finalInfections of the urinary tract final
Infections of the urinary tract final
 
Collins
CollinsCollins
Collins
 
Steps of curriculum development
Steps of curriculum developmentSteps of curriculum development
Steps of curriculum development
 
Hepatitis management
Hepatitis managementHepatitis management
Hepatitis management
 
Chronic renal failure
Chronic renal failureChronic renal failure
Chronic renal failure
 
Poisoning (toxicology)
Poisoning    (toxicology)Poisoning    (toxicology)
Poisoning (toxicology)
 
Systemic lupus erythematosis.
Systemic lupus erythematosis.Systemic lupus erythematosis.
Systemic lupus erythematosis.
 
Pulmonary neoplasm
Pulmonary neoplasmPulmonary neoplasm
Pulmonary neoplasm
 
Infections of the urinary tract
Infections of the urinary tract Infections of the urinary tract
Infections of the urinary tract
 
Peptic ulcer disease
Peptic ulcer diseasePeptic ulcer disease
Peptic ulcer disease
 
Workshop on ospe and osce
Workshop on ospe and osceWorkshop on ospe and osce
Workshop on ospe and osce
 
Summative evaluation 06.03.2014
Summative evaluation   06.03.2014Summative evaluation   06.03.2014
Summative evaluation 06.03.2014
 
Sociometry
SociometrySociometry
Sociometry
 
Presentation1 new copy
Presentation1 new   copyPresentation1 new   copy
Presentation1 new copy
 
Formative evaluation
Formative evaluationFormative evaluation
Formative evaluation
 
Evaluation strategies conference final
Evaluation strategies conference finalEvaluation strategies conference final
Evaluation strategies conference final
 
A seminar on quantitave data analysis
A seminar on quantitave data analysisA seminar on quantitave data analysis
A seminar on quantitave data analysis
 

Item analysis

  • 1. ITEM ANALYSIS Dr. Rajasree Lecturer in General Education K.U.C.T.E,Aryad,Alappuzha
  • 2. ITEM ANALYSIS  Item analysis is a statistical technique which is used for selecting and rejecting the items of the test on the basis of their difficulty value and discriminating power  Item analysis is done for obtaining: Difficulty value (D.V) Discriminative power (D.P)
  • 3. OBJECTIVES OF ITEM ANALYSIS: To select appropriate items for the final draft To obtain the information about the difficulty value(D.V) of all the items  To provide discriminatory power (D.I) to differentiate between capable and less capable examinees for the items To provide modification to be made in some of the items To prepare the final draft properly ( easy to difficult items
  • 4. STEPS OF ITEM ANAYSIS: Arrange the scores in descending order Separate two sub groups of the test papers Take 27% of the scores out of the highest scores and 27% of the scores falling at bottom Count the number of right answer in highest group (R.H) and count the no of right answer in lowest group (R.L) Count the non-response (N.R) examinees
  • 5. Difficulty value (D.V): “ The difficulty value of an item is defined as the proportion or percentage of the examinees who have answered the item correctly” - J.P. Guilford The formula for difficulty value (D.V ) D.V = (R.H + R.L)/ (N.H + N.L) R.H – rightly answered in highest group, R.L - rightly answered in lowest group N.H – no of examinees in highest group, N.L - no of examinees in lowest group
  • 6. In case non-response examinees available means, The formula for difficulty value (D.V) D.V = (R.H + R.L)/ [(N.H + N.L)- N.R] R.H – rightly answered in highest group R.L - rightly answered in lowest group N.H – no of examinees in highest group N.L - no of examinees in lowest group N.R – no of non-response examinees
  • 7. Discrimination index (D.I): “ Index of discrimination is that ability of an item on the basis of which the discrimination is made between superiors and inferiors ” – Blood and Budd (1972) Types of discrimination index (D.I):  Zero discrimination or No discrimination  Positive discrimination  Negative discrimination
  • 8. Zero discrimination or No discrimination : Zero discrimination or No discrimination: The item of the test is answered correctly or know the answer by all the examinee’s An item is not answered correctly by any of the examinee Positive discrimination index: Positive discrimination index :An item is correctly answered by superiors and is not answered correctly by inferiors. The discriminative power range from +1 to -1. Negative discrimination index: Negative discrimination index :An item is correctly answered by inferiors and is not answered correctly by superiors.
  • 9. The formula for discrimination index(D.I) D.I = (R.H - R.L)/ (N.H or N.L) R.H – rightly answered in highest group R.L - rightly answered in lowest group N.H – no of examinees in highest group N.L - no of examinees in lowest group
  • 10. General guidelines for discriminating index (D.I) According to Ebel , D.I Item Evaluation ≥0.40 -Very good items  0.30 - 0.39 Reasonably good but subject to improvement  0.20 – 0.29 Marginal items , need improvement <0.19 Poor items . Rejected or revised
  • 11. D.V Item Evaluation 0.20 – 0.30 Most difficult 0.30 - 0.40 Difficult 0.40 – 0.60 Moderate difficult 0.60 – 0.70 Easy 0.70 – 0.80 Most easy Relationship between difficulty value and discrimination power  Both (D.V & D.I) are complementary not contradictory to each other Both should be considered in selecting good items  If an item has negatively discriminate or zero discrimination, is to be rejected whatever be the difficulty value