Ecological Impact Of Fur Trade On American Culture

Ecological Impact Of Fur Trade On American Culture
When the Europeans visitors started coming to North America they hoped to find vast amounts of
gold and silver, but they found something else, which proved to be just as valuable as furs. The
ecological impact of the fur trade on the Indians of the North America demonstrates that the Indians
were not the beneficiaries, but the victims in fur trade with all the other Europeans countries which
affected them socially, environmentally and economically. French and the English fisherman in
1500's were the first to purchase fur from the Indians, in exchange the Indians received European
manufactured goods such as knives, guns and steel blades, for example according to the text
Indigenous Peoples of the Arctic, Subarctic, and Northwest Coast. Ed said, "That could be fitted to
traditional adzes to cut more efficiently than stone or shell blades, yet initially spurned axe and
hatchet blades because these required a drastic change in motor habits and coordination patterns."1
Many fishermen abandoned fishing and made voyages to North America only to trade fur. At this
time none of the Europeans nor Frenchmen resided in Canada or along the Northeast coast of North
America, they simply traded and went back ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
By the 1750's almost every Indian man in the Great Lakes region owned a rifle, and Indian women
relied almost completely on other utensils. Most Indians wear clothes manufactured in Europe rather
than leather or fur. During summer, they lived in small villages which often consisted of several
hundred people. In these villages, they gathered fish and grew crops for food. In the winter, these
villages would split up in to small hunting bands. Furthermore Indians started their hunts earlier in
the winter, and focused on animals which produced valuable pelts and they migrated farther way
from the villages.
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

The Aspect Of Faux Furs In The Fashion Industry
The Aspect of Faux Furs in the Fashion Industry
Faux (f–oh) – Made in imitation; Fake
Faux furs in the fashion industry is the only moral substitute against real furs. Furs in the fashion
industry, is it moral? This has been an alarming question for quite some time. In response, the
creation of Faux furs has taken the industry by storm. For years, the bearing of fur in fashion was
associated with wealth, luxury, and glamour. With this perception of status, comes the perception of
faux furs. Associated with cheap, knock–offs of furs; identified as "a cheap imitation for the mass
markets."– (Trew, 2012).
Faux furs have taken primary standpoint for use of fashion, and are a predominant political
statement in the industry. Designers are using faux fur in a proud statement against the fur industry.
Faux furs are being used as political protest statements, and have evolved into a creature of their
own from a life of being a tacky counterfeit. While faux fur has very recently created a strong
positive presence in fashion, it's debate has been dated back to the 19th century. PETA's campaign of
naked celebrities protested that 'they would rather go naked than wear fur'; while David Bailey's
Dumb Animals campaign for Greenpeace protested that 'It takes 40 dumb animals to make a fur
coat, but only one to wear them.' These campaigns were some of the most publicized and
controversial and took place in a controversial time for the great fur debate, the eighties and nineties.
The protest

Fur Is Dead Research Paper
The grade I recieved for this paper was an A+, just incase you were wondering....
"Fur is Dead"
Taking a look into a once strong industry, shocking facts are revealed. The fur industry brings in an
average of $1.5 billion in sales each year. Furs were considered a beautiful and feminine version of
clothing by many women, until the public became aware of the horrors that accompany the industry.
Activists have been a voice for animals tortured for their fur, making the public aware, and
diminishing the old view of fur. Approximately 3.5 million fur–bearing animals are killed each year
by trappers, and another 2.7 million are raised on fur 'farms'. (1)
The fur industry is a 'for–profit' venture, meaning methods that maximize production ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
This is a simple yet crude device, and has been banned in 63 countries, and four U.S states.(3) Greta
Nilsson exposes the inhumane trap in "Facts About Furs":
When an animal steps on the leghold trap spring, the trap's jaws slam down on the animal's limb. Dr.
Robert E. Cape explains that "if the trap is properly anchored, the captured animal will struggle to
get loose, mutilating the foot and causing deep, painful lacerations. Or the animal will attempt
escape by chewing or twisting off the trapped extremity. Ten to 12 hours after being captured, the
animal is still in pain." After a prolonged time, he explains, "will suffer from exhaustion, since they
expend such a great amount of energy in attempting to escape. With exhaustion, the animal suffers
from exposure, frostbite, shock, and eventually death.(4)
Not all animals suffer that long, some suffer for even longer periods, and face further torture. When
the trappers return (often days later) they, like the fur farms, use the cheapest methods possible to
kill the animals, and whatever method that won't damage the fur. The lucky few get shot, but the
cheaper more physical methods of death are most commonly used. Animals are beaten, stomped to
death, or the "Trapper's Method" of standing on the animal's chest and yanking their hind legs
out, crushing their lungs. (5) The animals used for fur get this treatment, animals that have no value
in

How Did Americans Acquire Beaver Fur?
Jean Nicolet, landed at Red Banks Green Bay, in 1634. His arrival would lead to the popular trade of
Beaver fur in Green Bay, Wisconsin. While, there were many types of fur that would be traded in
this area, such as otter, white–tailed deer, badger, fox, muskrat, and bear, beaver by far was the most
to be desired. The allure for beaver fur was that the fur was entirely water proof. Water proof fur
was the most preferred at this time as majority of people during this period would work outside, i.e.:
farmers, or transporter of goods. Native Americans, would hunt for the beaver, and trade the furs for
goods from the French. The trade would take place at the outpost, and the items traded for fur would
be metal knives or tomahawks, kettles, guns and ammo, wool blankets, alcohol, or porcelain beads.
Beads not being a necessity were not the most common item traded. Yet, considering they were a
luxury item, those that were able to obtain beads, and particular dark blue beads (as these ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In Europe, many of the beavers were facing extinction, endangerment, or just non–existence in the
region. Beaver fur was so strongly desired that they were over hunted in Europe which, left for very
few beavers to find or hunt in the region. While, in the America's and particularly in Wisconsin, the
beaver population was verily massive as fur trade was non–existent before European settlers (but
later on due to fur trade the beaver population would face endangerment). What made Green Bay,
such a great place to trade was the accessibility to transport from point A to point B. Considering,
that during this era, roads were not yet established, the best way to get around was by water. Green
Bay, offered an area surrounded by body of water, thus made the transport of fur trade much more
effective and

American Fur Trading Company and John Jacob Astor
The American Fur Company and John Jacob Astor
I. Introduction "Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely (Lord Acton). John
Jacob Astor was a man that had absolute power during his era and used his power and wealth to
benefit himself and not the "social fabric of society". Astor lived during the time of a post–
revolutionary America which allowed him to build a monopolist empire with little restraint from
government or society. Starting out in American as a young German immigrant, John Jacob Astor
became involved in the fur trading business "without ever having set a trap" (Stokesbury) and
eventually built a fur trading company that extended across the United States and into Canada and
made him the richest man in ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He was the "personification of monopoly, determined to rule or ruin," wrote historian Hiram Martin
Chittenden in 1903. "And he was thoroughly hated even by those who respected his power"
(Crossen). The issue arises should one person be able to control that much power and isn't held
accountable for the use of that power to society? One complicated issue of the American Fur
Company reign was its impact on the expansion of the United States westward. It strongly
influenced the history of the west, not only making way for permanent settlements but by also
opening the Great Lakes commercial fishing, steamboat transportation, and trade in that area
(Stokesbury). But was the benefit derived from this westward expansion justified by the "extraction"
that took place against its stakeholders or those it affected? Is injustice every justified?
III. Analysis of Issues Astor, in his desire for more money and greater profit, completely disregarded
the needs of the people his actions affected. This lack of social responsibility was the American Fur
Company's worst offense. His was constantly looking for ways to improve his financial bottom line.
Whatever means were needed to increase his company's hold on the American fur trading industry
was permissible. When Astor learned that President George Washington was having the government
set up fur–trading posts "to be run with benevolent policies", which would require goods

All Fur Motif
Written by Jacob and Wilhelm Grimm, "All Fur" is essentially a tale about a young woman's efforts
to escape her incestuous father. Of the many seemingly impossible tasks the girl demands her father
to accomplish, obtaining a cloak made from a thousand animal furs appears to be the most unlikely.
However, the king is able to present his daughter with this cloak, thereby creating the motif of
disguise. Originally a means for escaping her wicked father, the fur cloak becomes a means for All
Fur to escape her identity, effectively representing a chosen buffer between herself and the sexual
desires of men. This hideous, repulsive disguise ironically leads All Fur to achieving the attractive
state of being free from the patriarchy.
Prior to receiving the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
She is no longer a beautiful girl with dresses and jewels to match. Instead, the princess is referred to
as "furry creature" (Grimm 48). All Fur has declined in status once again by earning the title of
creature. The word has a simple definition: "an animal, distinct from a human being." All Fur has
descended from otherworldly princess to a repulsive human to a being separated from humans
altogether. Her furry appearance coupled with her new nickname create an identity of invisibility, an
identity that ensures she will never be noticed by a man in any sexual manner.
All Fur's attendance at the first ball was widely noticed and appreciated due to the loss of her
disguise. Immediately after removing her fur cloak, All Fur is described by the king as "nothing less
than a royal princess" (Grimm 48). Recognizing the effects of her true identity, All Fur disappears in
order to assume her safe, invisible identity. She "runs" back to her tiny closet and undresses
"quickly," both words signifying a certain amount of haste and desperation to return to being an
unnoticeable furry

American Fur Trade
There are a plethora of news sites, organizations, and establishments, all within the American fur
trade, that enjoy deceiving the general public with claims of a humane and safe fur trade. While
these claims seem to hold credibility, they fall flat once challenged with heavy evidence of cruelty
and peril. The fur trade should be outright banned from the United States as it excludes humane
methods of euthanasia, utilizes wretched methods of confinement, and as it acts as an extreme health
hazard. Trappers, farmers, retail stores, and any individual who accommodates this cruelty, fails to
take into consideration the lives of millions of animals, as well as their own health.
Although the evidence against statements of humane treatment and euthanasia ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
Because of the fact that fur sheared from a dead animal will rot, manufacturers fight off decay
through the application of a slew of chemicals that are designed to prevent decomposition. The main
processing chemicals used are formaldehyde and chromium which are both linked to cancers, such
as leukemia. In addition, the Environmental Protection Agency, or EPA, in the United States, has
"previously fined six fur processing plants for causing high levels of pollution and for using solvents
in fur dressing that "may cause respiratory problems..." (Hoskins, Tansy. "Is the Fur Trade
Sustainable?" The Guardian. Guardian News and Media, 29 Oct. 2013. Web. 20 Mar. 2016.). Even
more unacceptable is the fact that fur production is unregulated. This leads to the incorrect labeling
of fur clothing which essentially leaves consumers ignorant about the severe chemicals that are
exposed. This horrid fashion statement not only threatens animals, even those that existed in
tremendous numbers, with extinction, but also threatens consumers with respiratory issues and
cancer. Essentially, both humans and animals encounter ultimate death as it has been found that fur
clothing contains carcinogens, which is any substance that is directly involved in causing cancer.
Altogether, it is more than apparent that the hazardous fur trade causes a greater amount of harm
than good.

Essay The Fur Trade Period in the Indian Territory
The Fur Trade Period in the Indian Territory
Images of rough faced, Grizzly Bear fighting, firewater drinking, yarn spinning, frontiersmen form
in the minds eye. Wild men for wild times! To a degree this image is true, but the fur trade was more
than wild men. The fur trade was a business, conducted by businessmen. The wilder men living on
the frontier chose trapping. Fashion created the fur trade as businessmen sought to satisfy the tastes
of designers and customers back east and in Europe, where furs and hides were necessities for
fashionable clothing and accessories. Fashions also affected the Indians who sought, silver,
vermillion, glass beads, and clothe from traders. Each group depended on the other to supply the
resources. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In 1824, due to escalating conflicts between Osages and eastern tribes, the government constructed
Ft. Gibson at the mouth of the Neosho on the Arkansas River, thus adding government settlers or
merchants to the mix of traders and changing trade practices in the area forever. "Should peace be
restored, the different tribes would turn their attention altogether to hunting, consequently the
Arkansas River would become as valuable highway as the Mississippi and Missouri for the
transportation of furs and other articles of Indian trade," A.P. Chouteau.
As the Civilized Tribes were being relocated, the U.S. army sent expeditions west. While preparing
for one such expedition, Washington Irving in his journal "A Tour of the Prairies" recounts the scene
at Chouteau's trading post as;" a few log houses on the banks of the river, surrounded by a group of
Osages simple in garb and aspect, a party of Creeks quite oriental in their appearance, a sprinkling
of trappers, hunters, half–breeds, Creoles, Negroes, and other rabble of nondescript beings between
civilized and savage life".
The fur trade also took place along the Red River. Here no one trader dominated like the Chouteau
family of the three forks area. Independent traders established posts along the Red River to trade
with the Kiowas and Comanches and the Choctaws and Chickasaws. Josiah Doaks began a small
post near the junction of the Kiamichi and Red Rivers in 1821.

Today, the fashion industry is pumping out thousands of...
Today, the fashion industry is pumping out thousands of fur coats for prospective buyers. The
attempt of masking the true price of retrieving that fur by glamorizing coats is beyond most buyer's
attention. Some people know that animals go through pain when their fur is taken for the purpose of
fashion, but most people do not understand the extent of the mutilation they go through. To be sure
the fur is fresh and neat, certain animals are sometimes skinned alive. Fur farming is not only
inhumane, but it also has a negative effect on nature. Fur farming is bad for the environment, brutal
to animals and the animals are also inhumanely killed. According to psychological theory, the
humanistic view claims that every person has good in them. ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
To catch the animals, the farmers use a device called a leg–hold trap. "A study in Wheeler Nation
Wildlife Refuge discovered that 26% of animals would actually attempt to bite of their limbs in
order to escape one of these traps in the hopes of survival" ("Ranch Fur Cruelties"). The fact that
animals are willing to chew of their body parts in order to escape means that the leg–hold trap must
be painful towards the animals, which means it is an inhumane way of capturing an animal. Fur
farming has been around for many years, but not always for the poor purpose of fashion. Although
there are countless disadvantages with fur farming, many individuals are blinded by the glamour of
the fur fashion industry to see that. One of the most crucial issues is how badly fur farming effects
the environment which is almost always a victim of a human's doing.
Effecting the environment has been a common issue that seems to keep resurfacing all over the
world. While raw animal fur pelts may be biodegradable, the fur industry conveniently neglects to
mention the fact that all of the animal skins used to make fur go through a tanning process ('Nothing
Humane about Fur Farms"). Tanning is a process that uses environmentally damaging toxins such as
formaldehydes and strong acids. These chemicals are a danger to the atmosphere, helping destroy
the environment which is already being damaged by other human–made things such as carbon
dioxide from cars or grime from nuclear plants. The

The Role of Native and Métis Women in the Western Fur Trade
Final Research Paper The Role of Native and Métis Women In the Western Fur Trade Over time, the
power that Native women held with in their tribe has unfortunately digressed. During the age of
exploration Native women have played key roles in the western fur trade. Native women assisted the
fur traders by being liaison between the Europeans and Natives. This role was fundamental in
strengthening trade increasing the economic stability of the post. They acted as guides for the
European traders who often found themselves in dangerous and unfamiliar territory. Finally, they
provided an intimate relationship for the European traders, and played a pragmatic role as a
domesticated wife. However in order to fully understand the magnitude of the ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
Before the Europeans came to Canada, Natives had their own culture, traditions and norms. These
differences were obvious to the Europeans who sailed to Canada, their interactions with the Native
peoples proved these vast differences. One major difference noted was that the Iroquois organized
their societies on different lines than did the patrilineal western Europeans. Iroquois women "by
virtue of her functions as wife and mother, exercised an influence but little short of despotic, not
only in the wigwam but also around the council fire." "She indeed possessed and exercised all civil
and political power and authority. The country, the land, the fields with their harvests and fruits
belonged to her ... her plans and wishes modeled the policy and inspired the decisions of council."
The Europeans were astounded by this way of life. The women have great power here. A man may
promise you something, and if he does not keep his promise, he thinks he is sufficiently excused
when he tells you that his wife did not wish to do it. I told him then that he was not the master, and
that in France women do not rule their husbands . As well accounts from traders who explored the
Northwest coast have written about the strong roles women played in trade transactions with these
unfamiliar men. On one account an Englishman who was visiting and having an experience in
trading at Nootka Sounds. [A senior trader under the East India Company], named James Strange
jotted

Fur Trade History
Throughout the 18th and 19th centuries, the fur trade and fur trading industry was at its height.
There were many fur trade companies in most civilized regions of North America.One major
compnents of the fur trade was the hunters or trappers, which many of were Native Americans.
Since Europeans came to America, there had been constant interactions with Native Americans, both
peaceful and violent. Native Americans, Europeans and American settlers could benefit from one
another, leading to an extensive style of interactions of any kind. These topics are thoroughly
discussed in Michael Punke's, The Revenant, and Shirley Christian's, Before Lewis and Clark. In
both novels, settlers endure hardships with Native–Americans, and in some instances agreements ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
There were various regulated or government activities involving Indians. First of all, multiple
regulations were put on trading, trading areas and who could trade with who. For example. the
Spanish governor of the Louisiana Territory gave the Osage trade monopoly to Manuel Lisa in 1802,
cancelling the monopoly with the Chouteau's (Christian, 103). Trade was regulated, and certain
companies or people had certain tribes or places to trap, hunt or trade. People and or their companies
could also be banned from trading with the Indians. Another way the government was involved with
interactions, was by bringing leaders from certain tribes to Washington D.C., a way to impress the
Indians and to show them the different and exciting ways and materials of the white man (Christian,
116). This helped the Indians become more trusting and open about the views and decisions of the
government and executives. The Government or leaders of certain territories could create or decide
on trade agreements. treaties, and what to do in the case of a large conflict. These officials could
dictate or create groups of me to hunt, trade and meet with Indians. One of the largest government
regulated orders was the Lewis and Clark Expedition of the Louisiana Territory. Native–Americans,
Whites and Europeans interacted because or through the regulation of officials or government

Fur Elise Research Paper
Fur Elise, German for For Elise, is unquestionably one of Beethoven's achievements. Not only is it a
masterpiece, but it's a mystery piece. To know Beethoven, one would say the genius was
revolutionary, a true extremist. However, he was a troubled man, a musical brainiac who lost his
hearing late in life. With this said, Beethoven never heard his last pieces, including Bagatelle. Later,
Bagatelle was given its nickname, Fur Elise. Why? Well, that's the mystery. Some scholars believe
Fur Elise or For Elise is actually For Therese. Therese von Brunswick [Therese Malfatti?] was the
woman thought to have stolen Beethoven's heart. The gossip is a] Beethoven proposed to Therese
and she acknowledged his love but later changed her mind, or b]

Similarities Between The Fur Trade Economy And A Modern...
An Analysis of the similarities and differences between the Fur Trade economy and a modern
oligopoly.
The North American fur trade started in the 1500's as the result of early, sporadic contact and trade
between aboriginal societies and European fishing crews located off the banks of Newfoundland and
the St. Lawrence region. Animal pelts, which were harvested by the natives, were exchanged for
European goods such as weapons, tools and textiles. The beaver, whose inner coat was used to make
the fashionable felt hat in Europe, was the principal and most valuable pelt that was traded. "By
1600, not only was the felt hat popular, but changing fashion led to widened brims and thus an
increase in the amount of beaver fur required per item ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In essence, the fur trade market was divided amongst these two trading posts. Throughout the
1700's, both the British and French, vigorously competed with each other for control of the fur trade.
The structure and behavior of both entities resemble the characteristics of firms in oligopolistic
competition. In this essay, the structural and behavioral characteristics of firms in the fur trade shall
be compared and contrasted to the structural and behavioral characteristics exhibited by modern
oligopolies.
In oligopolistic competition, the market is dominated by a few large firms that produce
differentiated or identical goods. For example, the Canadian market for internet service providers is
dominated by Rogers communications, Bell Canada, Telus and Shaw communications. The idea is
that although there may exist other smaller ISP's in Canada, majority of the market share is
controlled by these four companies. The fur trade was structured in a similar fashion with the market
being dominated by primarily two firms, the Hudson's Bay Company and the Northwest Company.
Thus, the fur trade mainly functioned as a duopoly (the most basic form of oligopoly where the
market for a particular product is dominated by only two firms) until the merger of the two
companies in 1821. Furthermore, oligopolies are characterized as having high barriers to entry that
make it difficult for

Fur Farm Ethical Issues
To finally decide if fur is morally ethical it is necessary to look deeper into the process of creating
the pelts. Fur farming is the easiest and most popular way to "produce" the fur skins, which are later
used to create garments, trims and accessories in fashion. The main and most important furbearers
kept on farms are minks and foxes. According to Linzey "around 50 million mink (Mustela vison)
and 7 million foxes (mostly Arctic fox, Alopex lagopus) are bred each year to meet the world
demand for their skins" (2009: 97). When hearing the term "fur farm" most of the people would
imagine a warm and friendly environment where animals are kept healthy, well fed and happy, but
the reality of it seems to be different. The facilities at fur farms reminding more of a prison cells. For
their entire lives the animals are kept in small, wired cages which are preventing them from doing
any of their natural activities such as making nests, running or swimming. Furthermore, living in a
small cage in such conditions causes many of the animals to go insane. Their frustration due to
anxiety and the inability to meet their basic requirements often leads to self–harming by for instance
biting their own skin, tail or feet, and in some cases even cannibalizing their own cage–mates.
Studies show that majority of these animals develop behavioural ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
At age of only seven months, the offspring is being killed in November. "A typical mink cage
measures 70 centimetres long by 40 wide and 45 high, and a cage for two Arctic foxes would
typically measure 110 centimetres square" (Linzey, 2009: 98). The killing is usually performed by
using drastic and shocking methods such as gassing, poisoning with strychnine or neck breaking.
Another popular and painful method is by using electrocution whilst animals have clamps attached
to their mouths and anuses. All that is due to keeping the fur

Kiss Of The Fur Queen Analysis
In Tomson Highway's novel Kiss of the Fur Queen the opening passage transports the reader to the
harsh, cold, and intense struggle of the caribou hunter, Abraham Okimasis during a championship
husky sled race. Any race often proves to be physically and mentally exhausting for a person.
Highway utilizes a fantastic variety of literary devices to dramatize Okimasis' physical and
emotional experience through his last leg of the race by creating a powerfully intense atmosphere
through the effective use of descriptive imagery, passionate diction, repetition of words, and a tone
of desperation. To begin with, the author utilizes descriptive vivid imagery to awaken the reader's
sensory perception, and it helps the reader to realistically envision ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
These devices hook the reader and allow them to use their senses to experience the adventure within
the passage. The physical and emotional experience of Okimasis becomes vivid to the reader and
captivates their attention to the end of the finish

Women In the Fur Trade
Aboriginal women had occupied an essential position in the fur trade of the North American region
from its birth during the 17th and 18th centuries. Even though this is true, the role of women,
especially those of the Native American society, has been ignored a great deal in the entire history of
fur trade. Contrary to the belief that the whole fur trade activity was only male–dominated, it very
much depended upon Native women and their participation and labor in order to ensure survival as
well as economic success. This paper will attempt to illuminate how Native women played the role
as important producers when it comes to fur trade of the American Plains and, of course, the
Canadian region. This paper will also deal with the two ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The fur traders could not help but learn many different and essential survival skills, and other skills
in general, from their God–given Aboriginal wives. These women paved the way for the knowledge
of which plants could be edible, held the important and amazing knowledge of medicinal properties
of certain plants, acted as pack mules, tanned the furs and hides for clothing and were the mothers of
the new nation: the Métis. Miller 4 The fur traders learned skills such as the language and the
customs of the people whom their wives' derived from. If a woman, for instance, from a group of
Aboriginal Peoples married a trader, she frequently acted as a peacemaker and interpreter among her
own people as well as the traders. The women tried to help their husbands have conversations and
communicate well with Aboriginal Peoples. And this improved their overall trading relationship.
Marriage à la façon du pays, or "according to the customs of the country," was a bond which unified
the European American and Canadian fur traders and Native tribes, with many of them having to
pay a "bride price" for the daughters of the very top tribal leaders. There were two important, yet
basic, features to forming a marriage such as this. The first feature was to make sure that there is
secure consent of the woman's relations. It seemed as though the woman's wishes were respected.
And there is plenty of evidence pointing to the fact that Aboriginal women sought to marry fur

How The Fur Trade Changed Western Part Of Canadian History
For about two hundred years, fur trade has been the core force in shaping western part of Canadian
history since the establishment of the Hudson's Bay Company in 1670. For almost all the time,
women and non–whites were usually dismissed in Canadian historical records due to the idea of
patriarchy and racialization. Sometimes because their works were mostly unpaid, their contributions
were easily ignored. Most of scholars have considered that the fur trade was a male–dominated
activity. Therefore, although Aboriginal and Metis women played a role as instrumental as men in
the fur trade between Europeans and First Nations, their functions have often been ignored.
However, it must be admitted that the fur trade success cannot be accomplished without the
participation of Native and Metis females.
Firstly, intermarriages which also can be called a la facon du pays between First Nation women and
males who were French Canadians, British, American and Indian employees of the fur trade
companies was crucial in the fur trade. The traders from various trade companies usually stayed
with Aboriginal ladies for a long time in a "visiting" and "guiding" relationship at the beginning of
the fur trade. Since there were only very limited number of white ladies in the colonies, the male
European traders started to marry with Indian girls because these men needed women for both
sexual and spiritual requirements. However, their marriages served to bring huge
profits for everyone,

Canadian Fur Trade During The Canadian Economy
The Canadian fur trade played a key role in the development of Canada as a country in many ways,
largely because of the growing need for furs by women overseas. The fur trade acted as the early
foundation of the Canadian economy. The trade increased international trade and consequence acted
as a driver of extending the exploration of the vast Canadian wilderness – much further than would
otherwise have occurred. Concurrently, one of the more important outcomes of the fur trade was that
it acted as the catalyst increasing the relationship between the European and First Nations People.
Often overlooked in Canadian history, for their role in the fur trade, are the First Nation women,
who were key contributors to the expansion and success of fur trading. Many of the European fur
traders upon arriving on Canadian soil ended up having sexual relationships with First Nation
women; often leading to marriage. While such marriages were to be expected in remote locations
there were additional incentives for the men since the marriage to First Nation women brought many
other benefits to the fur traders: for example, women possessed a skill set and knowledge of the land
which was unknown to the traders; the woman could act as a mediator and translator between the fur
traders and the First Nations tribes; and in many cases the marriages enabled the expansion of their
trading territories through new First Nations partners.
In a more fulsome analysis, these marriages had an immense economic

The American Fur Company Case Analysis Essay
The American Fur Company
Sarah Julien
Business and Society
MGMT 363
9/27/10
INTRODUCTION
The American Fur Company was a relentless monopoly operating in the climatic era of the fur trade.
It was established by John Jacob Astor in 1808. The company was created at a time that was
favorable to its expansion; it even grew to have a more powerful presence than the federal
government over vast areas. This case study analysis will evaluate John Astor in terms of his
motives, managerial ability, and ethics. This case study would also delve into a brief history of the
fur trade in America and its impact on society.
DISCUSSION
A Brief History of the American Fur Industry.
Anyone who has ever observed a fur ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Fur Industry's Effect on Society
The fur trading industry played a major role in the development of the United States and Canada for
more than 300 years. The fur trade began in the 1500's as an exchange between Indians and
Europeans. The Indians traded furs for such goods as tools and weapons. Beaver fur, which was
used in Europe to make felt hats, became the most valuable of these furs. The fur trade prospered
until the mid–1800, when fur–bearing animals became scarce and silk hats became more popular
than felt hats made with beaver. Traders and trappers explored much of North America in search of
fur. They built trading posts in the wilderness, and settlements grew up around many of these posts.
Some of these settlements later became such major cities as Detroit, New Orleans, and St. Louis in
the United States; and Edmonton, Montreal, Quebec, and Winnipeg in Canada.
Also as a result of the Fur trade, the beaver population depleted, Indian trappers became debilitated,
tribal cultures buckled under the pressure of new economic motives, tools and values. Consequently,
since production fell within an area, the traders moved and settlers moved in developing farms and
towns. The Indians in that area were either killed or moved by the government.

The Evolving Canadian Fur Trade History
''The Evolving Canadian Fur Trade History''
Shayne Lloyd
History 1121
Thompson River University
August, 24 2016
''The Evolving Canadian Fur Trade History''
Canada is known for the vast landscape diverse in natural resources that are found with in its
boarders stretching from coast to coast. The fur trade in Canada has a unique and colorful evolving
history. The geography of Canada with its thousands of lakes and wide spread landscape began as a
pristine environment to harvest furs. Early shore–based fishing exploitations off the Grand Banks
could have been causes for the initiation of the North American fur trade. Europeans were attracted
by the superb quality of the furs in the possession of the natives they encountered and saw the
potential for marketing such furs in Europe where stock of good quality fur was becoming
increasingly limited. Native people in what is now Canada, were interested in trading their furs for
European goods not accessible or known by the Native people. Foreign items that the Natives
sought out were metal implements, clothing, blankets and horses. Across the ocean a change in
men's headwear fashion in western Europe in the late 16th century motivated and drove the North
American fur trade as a major business opportunity for European nations. As part of their uniform
Swedish military officers fashioned a wide brimmed felt hat that inspired European men to wear a
similar style of hat, this type of hat became a big demand in

The Scene Of A Fur Coat Catwalk Show
The ad starts off with a short drumroll with lively and catchy background music, indicating an
upcoming important event, which is a fur coat catwalk show. Beautiful women start modelling on
the catwalk on by one. The scene shows audience and models alternatively. Once the first model
starts to walk, cameras of the reporters have not stopped flashing. Audience whistle and applaud as
models walk in front of them, who are showing off the fur coat on their bodies seductively.
The scene transfers to multiple audience's face, capturing especially their unconscious actions, like
biting their lips with hungry eyes, eyes following every movement of the models. consecutively
showing female audiences' jealousy, admiration and love towards the models wearing fur, with their
eyes stick to every movement of the fur–coat model. Moreover, the scene captures one of the male
audience expression of appreciation, towards these fur coat models. In a wide angle, all of the
audiences cannot take their eyes off these models.
The music suddenly turns minor, contrasting to an elegant turn around of one of the models.
Suddenly there is a splash of blood on an audience's face. Her face immediately turned sour, and
painful. More drops of blood are then seen on the catwalk, and on more audience's faces. They are
frightened and shocked as more blood is splashed on their faces. The background music turns to
compact sound of the animal jungle. Audience fearfully look at their blood–covered hands and back

The Trade Of The Fur Industry
Many people who wear fur are not aware with the sad reality behind its production. Fur is associated
with glamor and wealth. However, the truth is entirely different. Annually, millions of animals are
brutally killed for their skin in the name of fashion. Coats, accessories, hats, scarves, and other fancy
items are made from these innocent beings. They live their entire life in tiny cages, often with
diseases, and at the end – beaten, skinned alive and thrown onto a pile. It may sound terrifying, but
this practice happens on a daily basis. Before buying fur, people should be well–informed that their
trendy items come from cruel, needless, and bad for the environment industry. The main countries
that produce farm fur are China, Canada, United States, Russia, and various Eastern European
countries. China is the major fur's exporter. The fur industry is the only industry that is unregulated
by the federal government. Animals raised for fur in farms include minks, foxes, chinchillas, rabbits,
dogs, and cats. Also, there are beautiful wild animals such as raccoons, wolves, coyotes, and more
who are locked in steel–jaw traps while free in nature and then forced to live in cages their whole
lives. According to PETA Organization, "Animals who are trapped in the wild can suffer for days
from blood loss, shock, dehydration, frostbite, gangrene, and attacks by predators. They may be
caught in steel–jaw traps that slam down on their legs, often cutting to the bone. That

Fur Trade History
The fur trade industry is responsible for a great deal of the growth of North America into the
Canadian frontier we recognize today, particularly during the early contact period between European
settlers and Aboriginal groups that were living off the land prior to their arrival. Not only was it one
of the first major economic industries, the fur trade also played an extremely significant role in
shaping Canadian geography as we recognize it today. The competition between the Hudson's Bay
Company and the Northwest Company for access to furs, which was provided to them primarily by
Aboriginal people from various regions of the continent, each causing development by an increasing
need to establish trading posts deeper into the Canadian interior. ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
It is important to realize that women were real people leading real lives, and therefore have their
own histories, which they want to be acknowledged and respected.12 Women played very
significant roles in the development of industry itself, particularly (though not exclusively limited
to) the trade. Marriages between Europeans and aboriginal women, who were often the daughters of
traders, were used to strengthen trade relations. The result of these relationships was the birth of a
people who would be called the Métis. While the roles of women were more difficult to trace due to
ill–kept records "in the region around the Great Lakes, native and Métis women... at and around the
French posts" had several significant roles in their communities.13 Their participation in trade
culture spanned a very wide range, including activities like "spinning, supervision of market and
domestic gardening, managing livestock, keeping farm account books, and work as herbalists,
midwives, healers, miners, traders."14 England's dynamic, industrializing economy helped assure
that all of these occupations that were common during the seventeenth and early eighteenth
centuries. The trade industry subverted the gender imbalance and sexual division of labour due to
the disruption caused by the European trade. The trade

Examples Of Fur Trapping In The Oregon Country
The Fur Trapping Era in the Oregon Country occurred from the 1800s to the 1840s. Fur trading and
trapping was important because it brought an abundance of wealth to the Oregon Country. The
reasons for this are that it initiated fur trading between white fur trappers and Native Americans, it
caused many people to immigrate to the Oregon Country, bringing their money with them, and it
initiated the establishment of many fur trading forts. However, fur trapping in the modern era is not
considered ethical. For starters, The Fur Trapping Era in the Oregon Country initiated fur trading
between white fur trappers and traders and Native Americans. For example, "The fur trade in the
United States, and especially the Pacific Northwest would have been ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
For example, "They (The Rocky Mountain Fur Company mountain men) discovered the best routes,
passes, settlement sites, and natural resources (Lambert,162)." This was very important, because
with this additional knowledge, it was easy to make permanent settlements and trails. Another
example is, "...explorers and trappers explored and documented the region for their companies...
(Lambert, 153)." Mapping was very important at this time, because there were many spots in the
Oregon Country that hadn't been mapped or explored at all. With more space mapped out, explorers
could also estimate if the area was profitable for future fur trading. A final example is, "...the North
West Fur Company, routinely employed explorers to chart regions unfamiliar to whites (Lambert,
152)." Each fur company was racing to chart more land, where more furs could be

Animal Fur In The 1800's
During the 1800's, there was a noticeable spike in demand for animal fur's, pelt's, and hide's.
Especially in distant countries such as Spain and England. People believed that wearing the fur's or
having them around the house, such as rugs or throws was a sign of their wealth. Due to this sudden
high demand, men began noticing they could generate a significant amount of money by opening
businesses and selling the animal fur's, hide's, and pelt's as well as, other supplies for trapping and
other jobs. In 1833, three business partners decided they wanted to take a chance and open a fur
trading post as well. However, not only was this trading post for selling goods, it would also become
headquarters for an Army unit. In an open area now known as La Junta, Colorado, the three business
partners, brothers William and Charles Bent, and Ceran St. Vrain opened their first trading post,
naming it Bent's Fort. Bent's fort quickly became a very popular and successful trading post in
Colorado selling animal fur's and, other goods as well as, housing an Army unit. ... Show more
Vrain. William and George Bent were brothers. The eldest of the two brothers, Charles Bent was
born in 1799 on November 11th in what was Charleston, Virginia although, today it is known as
Charleston, West Virginia.1 The younger brother William Bent was born in 1809 on May 23rd in St.
Louis, Missouri.2 In 1827 the two brothers traveled the Missouri River on a trading excursion.
Following two years later in 1829 traveling with a group of people, the Bent brothers went on
another journey along the Santa Fe Trail trading American goods.3 Sometime during this excursion
is when the brothers met Ceran St.

Fur Trade Research Paper
By 1670 the fur trade had changed the village selection location to be closer to profitable furs . By
slightly moving the villages from the water ways and into the forest to be closer to the animals with
more profitable furs they could get more furs and their fore better trade goods.. Some tribes still
stayed close to the water ways because of the high value of beavers. Village population were
anywhere from 100 to 500 people3at this time. Sault Ste Marie was still a center of trade and a place
of refuge for the Potawatomi . The Potawatomi had moved north to get away from the Iroquois.
They would move further west into modern day Wisconsin by Green Bay. The Potawatomi who
lived near Green Bay grew Indian corn, fished, gathered acorns, berries ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Since the French had scared of the Iroquois many tribes started to return to their lands near Forts St.
Joseph. In 1691 for example there were Potawatomi living near Fort St. Joseph . The Potawatomi
had a strong relationship with the French and later the British. Because of their relation to the
French they trade with them a lot they even had a village on the opposites shore from Fort St.
joseph. The Potawatomi that has been scared of by the Iroquois by 1695 they stared to return back to
western Michigan . Which means the Potawatomi have almost gone full circle with leaving
southwest Michigan and returning 40 years later. Which shows that Potawatomi might not have
been forced out of the area so much by the Iroquois but maybe they have a 40–year migration
period. That would allow food to build back up in the areas they have villages. Since in the 1640's–
1650's the Potawatomi were living in southwest Michigan. By the 1670's they were at Sault Ste.
Marie and at the same time had villages in the Green Bay area. The Potawatomi fought with the
French in the French and Indian War. After the French left and the British took over the Potawatomi
did not trust them at first. Which can be seen in their actions during Pontiac's

American Fur Company
Michael Gallagher Case 1
Dr. Gardner 9/16/14
1.) Astor was an extremely greedy and selfish individual who took advantage of the indigenous
culture– the Native Americans. Astor saw the potential of the fur industry. He was a man who came
from a culture that already knew how to initiate business. His previous knowledge of business and
the Native American's ignorance allowed him to become very successful. His motives only
displayed his self–interest and possessed no regards for the Native Americans. His motives were
clear and the ethics behind his motives were even clearer. Astor had no ethics behind his
monopolized company. He not only became the largest fur company but he was the only fur ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
There were no regulations, no environmental protection, and no protection against individuals
especially the Native Americans. Astor and the American Fur Company took advantage of no
government interference and adopted an exploitive operation that preyed on an inferior culture.
Viewing what happened to the Native Americans brought to light that protection agencies needed to
be installed to make sure the future capitalistic society does not make the same

How Did The Fur Trade Affect The Cree Indian Culture
In the 1800s the fur trade had a great impact on the lifestyle of the Cree Indians, both economically
and culturally. The fur trade helped the Natives make an income and obtain goods they could not get
before. However great the impact of the fur trading was on their economy, the decline in fur bearing
animals had a devastating effect on their culture. It can therefore be said that although the fur trade
had a positive short term impact on the Cree Indian's economy, in the long term, the cultural ways of
living that were adapted and lost impacted them negatively.
Early contact of the Europeans with the Cree allowed for the establishment of trading patterns.
Europeans discovered that the soft fur was ideal for processing into felt to decorate ... Show more
In addition to losing material such as ammunition and firearms that would have simplified their
hunting and fishing methods, the Europeans imposed their beliefs and ways of life onto the natives.
They imposed their religious beliefs on the Cree, gradually converting them to Christianity (Vance).
Also, because of alcoholism and diseases unknown to the Cree, the people were left with no
remedies to the illnesses, devastating the people in different ways. In addition to all that was brought
from the Europeans through the fur trade, the introduction to different farming and hunting manners
led them to alter their own way of life (Vance). The connection that was established between the
Cree and the Europeans impacted where the Cree decided to live and even "how they exploited the
resources on which the trade and their survival was founded" (Carlos, Lewis). This is important
because it demonstrates how the fur trade altered the Cree's lifestyle. This led to the Cree's slowly
forgetting how to hunt for their own food in their own ways. It becomes clear from the above, that
the Cree culture and their traditional lifestyle started to slowly fade away and tat the European way
of living introduce during the fur trade became more

The Fur Trade : An Important Part Of The Political And...
The fur trade began, as early 17th to 19th centuries; it was an important part of the political and
economic development of North America. It offered a source of income and motivated searching of
the continent that was significant to many early colonial industries. There were five countries
involved in the Fur Trade in North America. These were England, Portugal, Holland, Spain and
France. But by the late 17th century there were only France and England. As the market of beaver
pelts in Europe grew, the fur trade became a more profitable trade than fishing and farming. The
native peoples became involved in a global market because of the fur trade; they were the key to the
development and continuation of the North America. According to R. M Maclver, the fur trade was a
primary industry whose growth was a vital factor in the expansion of Canada. In 1578, when
Europeans began navigating to Canada to explore and to fish, they found out that North American
was a land that is rich in fur–bearing animals. North American became known of a new source of
wealth because of the quality and quantity of beaver and other furs. This research paper studies the
nature of the fur trade, the initiation of a cooperation between the English and French to the
Aboriginal people, and the role of women in fur trade; the ecological ethnics, and how the fur trade
affects and change the Native way of life. The ecological impact of the fur trade on the Aboriginal of
North America demonstrates that the

Arguments Against Faux Fur
An analysis of the strengths and weaknesses found in the argument
Premise 1
Premise 1 argues that the animal fur industry should be stopped since faux fur is a better alternative
to animal fur. It claims that faux fur delivers the same benefits (it has an indistinguishable
appearance and provides greater warmth) with less environmental cost. The suppressed assumption
here is that environmental damage should be prevented where possible: this is a non–controversial
normative claim that does not require further support, and is, therefore, acceptable.
The first sub–premise, which asserts that "faux fur can replace animal fur in terms of human use" is
non–controversial and may be easily accepted. The second sub–premise, a causal argument that faux
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Premise 1 is unacceptable because the author fails to adequately compare the environmental impact
of the control (animal fur) and test (faux fur) groups, and is therefore unsuccessful in arguing that
faux fur is a superior alternative. Consequently, premise 1 holds a very weak inference as to why the
animal fur industry should be stopped. Premises 2 and 3 are unacceptable since they are linked, and
premise 2 lacks sufficient analysis of the test and control groups. Since the author does not compare
the levels of suffering between the test (fur industry animals) and control (non– fur industry
animals) groups, we are unable to conclude that suffering would be reduced or prevented by ending
the animal fur industry. Hence, premises 2 and 3 do not support the argument that the animal fur
industry should be stopped to prevent suffering. Lastly, Premise 4 is unacceptable because it
commits fallacies of relevance and vacuity: it does not argue why the industry should be stopped,
but instead proposes a method of stopping the industry. In these ways, the argument has a very weak
rational core. The author has attempted to conceal these logical flaws with rhetorical devices
including emotionally charged language and loaded descriptions. Ultimately, however, they have
committed multiple fallacies and further undermined their claims. For these reasons, the argument
should be

How Did The Fur Trade Affect American Culture
The standard history of the fur trade tended to consider the Aboriginal Canadians as monolithic and
treated them as completely subject to European dominance, economic and technological, from first
contact. They argued that exploitative dealings and reliance on European technology immediately
and inevitably led to the collapse of native societies. More recently historians, such as Bruce
Trigger, while examining the Hurons drew attention to different elements of Huron society and how
they responded to European influence over time. Other historians such as Abraham Rothstein have
examined the cultural rather than economic aspects of the fur trade and maintained that it was not
the exploitative relationship presented by the traditional view. Others ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
In addition to altering alliances, the basic destructive capacity of guns significantly altered the
nature of warfare between tribes, as described by a Saukamappee youth in comparing two battles,
the first of which predates the introduction of guns, in which he stated "on both sides several were
wounded, but none lay on the ground; and night put an end to the battle without a scalp being taken
on either side, and in those days such was the result, unless one party was more numerous than the
other." and continues to describe a battle after the introduction of guns : "the battle had begun about
Noon, and the Sun was not yet half down, when we perceived that some of them had crawled away
from their shields...The greater part of the enemy took flight, but some fought bravely and we lost
more than ten killed and many wounded; Part of us pursued, and killed a few, but the chase had soon
to be given over, for at the body of everything Snake Indian killed, there were five or six of us trying
to get his scalp or part of his clothing, his weapons, or something of his as a trophy of the battle."
(Friesen,38). Friesen characterized the pre–gun warfare as rather benign, stating that "Shields were
adequate to defend against arrows, offensive tactics were static

Informative Speech On Wearing Fur
Title : Wearing fur is wrong
Organisational Pattern : Monroe's Motivated Sequence
Visual Aid : Power point slides
General Purpose : To persuade
Specific Purpose : To persuade my audience that we do not need to wear fur as it is an unethical
fashion item.
Central Idea : Millions of animals are tortured for the furs on their back and therefore, we must
change the perspective of how people see fur as a fashion item.
Introduction
I. Imagine yourself stuck in a cramped, dirty, cold and dark cage.
II. You do not get any basic supplies like food, water and yet, you have to live in this filthy place for
the rest of your life.
III. For you, this is your home but suddenly, you have been dragged from your cage, endlessly
beaten until your last breathe and intensely painful skinned alive, followed by a sudden stabbing
electrocution through the anus.
IV. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Then, they tossed you like some garbage into a pile with others who suffered the same, exact fate
like you.
V. After doing ample research for this speech, it made me realize that how horrific the fur industry is
and for your information, this thing happens to animals like Angora rabbits, foxes and minxes every
single day just for the sake of fashion.
VI. Why should we care? It is not our skin that has been excoriate.
VII. Today, I hope to persuade each of you that it is not right to wear fur as it is brutal.
VIII. Since I have learnt about the condition of the animals that I have mentioned just now and the
production of fashion item such as fur coat, I think that this does not affect us emotionally on but
also mentally and physically.
(Transition: Let's look more closely at the reasons why fur is not appropriate for

What Was The True Identity Of Beethoven's Fur Elise?
Fur elise was written in April 27 1810 but was not published until 1865 well after beethoven's death
in 1827, and no distinct letters, or accounts from people at the time mention or state of an "elise" in
the composer's lifetime. This is now the reason for so much controversy because nobody knows who
elise is or why he named his piece that.
A theory was that there was a famous opera singer named elise who beethoven fell in love with and
therefore named his piece after her but the singer elise was not recorded famouse until years later
after the composer's death in April 27 1810.
Because the true identity of elise is still a mystery more and more theories are rising. During the
time beethoven was writing his piece the napoleonic wars were

Influence Of Fur Trade On American Culture
Chapter1.2
3.
In economic dimension, fur trade was profitable. It benefited not only Astor but also American at
that time. It exploited new and arid territories in American and stimulated the development of local
business. It created lots of employment opportunities.The fur was exported to European, China and
other countries which promoted international business.
In cultural dimension, fur trade influenced Indian and some tribes culture. During the trading with
the American fur company, they seduced Indians into drinking alcohol and getting a huge debt. New
trade goods made Indians to get new knowledge.
In technological dimension, thriving fur trade stimulated new technological innovation. Astor
introduced a steamboat, Yellowstone, which

The Fur Trading Business Of British Columbia
The fur trading business in British Columbia was a struggle for power between the fur traders and
the first nations. Each side wanted to have bargaining power over the other in the tense situation.
However, it is clear that the fur traders held the upper hand in British Columbia in several different
matters. First of all, the fur traders held power of the first nations material culture, the natives began
to rely on the good fur traders were giving them. Secondly, the fur traders have a massive advantage
militarily over the first nations, allowing the fur traders to subjugate the first nations. Lastly, the fur
traders had control over Native tribes allowing them greater access to information. It is quite clear
that the first nations desired European goods, as they would consistently make concessions to
European fur traders. The new items that Europeans traded to the First Nations drastically changed
the First Nations traditional way of life, making way for European's cultural imperialism. The
introduction of metal tools would make Natives quality of life extremely better, metal tools helped
woodcarving and metal kettles made cooking easier. Natives eventually became reliant on these
imported items, especially gunpowder and ammunition. Conflict between tribes tended to be
decided by who had greater access to power and ammo. Thus, the tribes that refused to trade with
Europeans were left at the mercy of opposing tribes. Moreover, the guns that Europeans provided to

The Pros And Cons Of Fur
Wearing fur in Britain twenty ages ago would have been considered as an unlawful deed, where
people would criticize you and some would even assault you by throwing paint over you, but
recently the world has noticed a vast rise of the fur industry. Fur is a type of material used for
clothes taken from animals ranging from rabbits to seals and beyond, basically it's the skin of some
animals. Fur is widely used by a good number of people aimed to satisfy numerous different types
of uses, such as clothes, blankets and occasionally even for decoration like carpets and curtains.
Animal fur is provided by high–end and even normal stores, but in my opinion fur should not be
worn, for it represents the torture and suffering of innocent animals, as a ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Humanity has lost its heart, tolerating these immense criminal acts and massive massacres against
beautiful creatures around our Mother Earth has even cost us more than just our hearts. The fur
industry is one of the cruelest industries in the world, making an animal go through so much pain
and suffering just to be sold for a very cheap price in dozen, as humans our job is to protect these
poor animals by raising awareness against how much agony and torture animals go through, plus we
must encourage people to boycott any brand that uses fur. The most killed animal species for their
fur are Minks, secondly foxes and then Chinchillas. They're kept imprisoned and caged up in
unsanitary and crowded cages helplessly watching their kind being slaughtered mercilessly and then
thrown into a pile of murdered animals, what's worse is that they are in line for the mass slaughter of
either having their skin ripped off their bodies or being smashed against a wall and after that they
will be disposed of just like a piece of a gum wrapper, their death comes when the excruciating pain
becomes too much to

Question#02:
How did the environment of the American Fur Company change in the 1830's? What deep historical
forces are implicated in these changes?
The American Fur Company:
The American Fur Company was founded by John Jacob Astor in 1808. The company grew to
monopolize the fur trade in the United States by 1830, and became one of the largest businesses in
the country.
In early 1830's it seemed nothing could slow Astor. But this environment suddenly changed for fur
companies. Although the American Fur company was still competing with other Fur companies,
unfavorable trends were building that would bring it down.
Factors Effecting Fur Companies Environment: A. Demand for beaver start falling due to change in
fashion trend of beaver hat ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
By the Standards of Today:
By analyzing the treatment received by the stakeholders of the fur industry in the 19th century with
the modern world standards, we come to know that they were treated highly unethically.
As they crushed the competition and exploited the workers monopolize the markets so these all
thing are highly unethical according to the today's standards and there are proper laws regarding
these unethical activities and whoever performs such activities are charged with fines and
punishments.
Question#05: On balance, is the legacy of the American fur company and of the fur trade itself a
positive legacy? Or is the impact predominantly negative?
American Fur Company and the Fur trade itself is a sort of positive legacy with all its faults and
shortcomings. It was in fact the main actor in the global industry with enormous geopolitical power.
It marked the trails that were followed by the settlers. It is very true to say that American Fur
Company and the Fur trades were the pathfinder of the civilization. "Civilization which was slowly
mastering the opposition of nature and barbarism" the trading posts build by them were later
appeared thriving towns and cities. They were the pioneers of many business models like capitalism
applied in this modern world globally. The Fur business expanded because of the innovative and
critical thinking of its owner. Even with all such advantages and

Negative Effects Of The Fur Trade
The fur trade was damaging to most First Nations. The fur trade began with good intention and
benefited the First Nations people, however; it slowly began to negatively impact them. Due to the
fur trade, First Nations began fighting with each other, a decline in wildlife began and diseases
spread and killed many people. First Nations people began conflicts over trade goods and at times
this led to fighting. The wildlife killed for fur trade purposes were slowly going extinct and
impacted the First Nations profits. Another negative impact of the fur trade was small pox, which
killed many First Nations people.
Rivalries began to form between various First Nations. There was tension due to the fur trade, as
every First Nation was profiting differently, and trading with varying people and nations. "After
twenty years of initial contact, the fur trade begins to substantially affect relationships between First
Nations" (Stonechild, 2016). Competition was a major issue for First Nations. The fur trade was
their main source of conflict. ""While the French and English vied with each other for the trade of
the Indians inhabiting the Western interior, the various Indian groups competed with each other for
control of the carrying ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
There was a strong demand for furs and hide, which led to the decline of traded animal furs and
hides. "By 1850, buffalo herds were in noticeable decline in the southern Manitoba area because of
the American demand for robes and hides for factory conveyor belts" (Stonechild, 2016). This was
the beginning of a loss for many First Nations as their main source of trade was being negatively
impacted. "After 1821, the HBC tried to enforce conservation of animals by limiting the number of
furs that could be trapped in certain areas and by banning the use of steel traps" (Stonechild, 2016).
Along with the decline in wildlife, many First Nations began seeing the impacts of European

Fur Persuasive Speech
Topic: Wearing fur is not ethical
Opening/Attention:
While wearing fur clothing in cold weather as protection goes back to the stone age, the source for
this material came from the wild. Starting in the latter half of the 20th century, producers and
wearers of fur have been criticized by animal rights activists because of the perceived cruelty they
believe is involved in animal trapping and because of the availability of substitutes such as synthetic
fibers.
As fur is no longer necessity why should animals suffer to no purpose?
Spoken Link:
Emotion/Story:
No federal humane slaughter law protects animals in fur factory farms, and killing methods are
gruesome. Because fur farmers care only about preserving the quality of the fur, they ... Show more
b) In Canada, opposition to the annual seal hunt is viewed as an anti–fur issue, although the Humane
Society of the United States claims that its opposition is to "the largest slaughter of marine mammals
on Earth." In Canada, opposition to the annual seal hunt is viewed as an anti–fur issue, although the
Humane Society of the United States claims that its opposition is to "the largest slaughter of marine
mammals on Earth."
c)According to statistics, one–third of all fur sold in the U.S. comes from animals killed in steel–jaw
traps, which are legal in 43 states. These traps slam shut on an animal's limb, which causes
excruciating pain and leaves the animal stuck and starving, sometimes for days. The conibear trap
crushes an animal's neck by applying 90 pounds of pressure per square inch, leaving the animal to
suffer for another three to eight minutes while he or she slowly suffocates.
Spoken Link:
"Rebuttal":
a) Fur is naturally resilient and long–lasting.
b)Fur is renewable and sustainable

Ecological Impact Of Fur Trade On American Culture

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Barb Tillich

More from Barb Tillich (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Ecological Impact Of Fur Trade On American Culture